601. Changes in cerebrospinal fluid pressure and spinal cord perfusion pressure prior to cross-clamping of the thoracic aorta in humans.
- Author
-
Grum DF and Svensson LG
- Subjects
- Anesthesia, Intravenous, Central Venous Pressure drug effects, Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure physiology, Constriction, Drainage, Heart Rate drug effects, Humans, Injections, Spinal, Papaverine administration & dosage, Papaverine therapeutic use, Paraplegia prevention & control, Pulmonary Wedge Pressure drug effects, Regional Blood Flow drug effects, Spinal Cord drug effects, Spinal Cord physiology, Time Factors, Aorta, Thoracic surgery, Blood Pressure drug effects, Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure drug effects, Fentanyl pharmacology, Isoflurane pharmacology, Mannitol pharmacology, Nitroprusside pharmacology, Spinal Cord blood supply
- Abstract
Little is known about what influences cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) during anesthesia prior to aortic cross-clamping (AXC). Therefore, this study measured the effect of anesthetic induction, of various drugs administered during the course of surgery prior to AXC, and of hemodynamic changes on CSFP, and calculated spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP = mean arterial pressure [MAP] - CSFP) in 11 patients undergoing surgery on the descending thoracic aorta. A lumbar drainage catheter was placed to facilitate drainage of CSF and to measure CSFP. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl, 50 micrograms/kg, and midazolam, 1 mg, using a pancuronium-metocurine mixture for neuromuscular blockade. Data were collected prior to and after (1) anesthetic induction, (2) mannitol to augment diuresis, (3) sequential use of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and isoflurane (ISO) to lower MAP by 20%, (4) drainage of spinal fluid, (5) intrathecal injection of papaverine (IP), and (6) AXC. Statistical comparisons of recorded data were made using the least squares mean method and Friedman test. Linear regression was used to test for correlation between CSFP and hemodynamics. Anesthetic induction affected neither hemodynamics nor CSFP. Mannitol significantly increased heart rate, central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), cardiac output (CO), and CSFP (P less than 0.05). SNP or ISO altered neither CVP, PCWP, CO, nor CSFP, which remained elevated at the postmannitol infusion level. ISO, unlike SNP, caused a significant decrease in SCPP (P less than 0.005). Subsequent drainage of 20 mL of CSF improved SCPP (P less than 0.05). IP did not have any effect on hemodynamics or CSFP. CSFP showed a strong correlation with CVP (r = 0.86).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
- Published
- 1991
- Full Text
- View/download PDF