51. Minimally Invasive Redo Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a Multicentric Registry (SURD-IR)
- Author
-
Gianluca Martinelli, Kevin Phan, Emmanuel Villa, Utz Kappert, Thierry Folliguet, Marco Di Eusanio, Giuseppe Santarpino, Bart Meuris, Alberto Albertini, Paolo Berretta, Malak Shrestha, Carlo Savini, Kevin Teoh, Thierry Carrel, Antonio Miceli, Carmelo Mignosa, Martin Andreas, Theodor Fischlein, Martin Misfeld, Marco Solinas, and Tristan D. Yan
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Regurgitation (circulation) ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Prosthesis Design ,Prosthesis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Postoperative Complications ,Aortic valve replacement ,Intensive care ,medicine ,Humans ,Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ,Thoracotomy ,Registries ,610 Medicine & health ,Dialysis ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation ,business.industry ,Incidence ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,medicine.disease ,Cardiac surgery ,Surgery ,Europe ,Treatment Outcome ,030228 respiratory system ,Heart Valve Prosthesis ,Cohort ,Female ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND Reoperation for aortic valve replacement can be challenging and is usually associated with an increased risk for complications and mortality. The study aim was to report the results of a multicenter cohort of patients who underwent minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement with a sutureless or rapid-deployment prosthesis. METHODS From 2007 to 2018 data from 3651 patients were retrospectively collected from the Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry. Of them, 63 patients who had previously undergone cardiac surgery represented the study population. In-hospital clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were recorded. RESULTS Mean age of the selected 63 patients was 75.3 ± 7.8 years and logistic EuroSCORE 10.1. Surgery was performed by ministernotomy in 43 patients (68.3%) and by anterior right thoracotomy in 20 (31.7%); 31 patients (49.2%) received the Perceval valve (Livanova PLC, London, UK) and 32 (50.8%) the Intuity valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Mean cross-clamp time was 57.8 ± 23.2 minutes and cardiopulmonary bypass time 95.0 ± 34.3 minutes. Neither conversion to full sternotomy nor in-hospital deaths occurred. Postoperative events were ischemic cerebral events in 3 patients (4.8%), need for pacemaker implantation in 2 (3.6%), bleeding requiring reoperation in 5 (8.9%), and dialysis in 1 (1.6%). Median intensive care unit stay was 1 day, and median length of hospital stay was 10 days. On echocardiographic evaluation 1 patient showed a significant postoperative aortic regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement with a sutureless or rapid-deployment prosthesis is a safe and feasible treatment strategy, resulting in fast recovery and improved postoperative outcome with no mortality and an acceptable complication rate.
- Published
- 2019