51. Public Discussion Affects Question Asking at Academic Conferences.
- Author
-
Telis N, Glassberg EC, Pritchard JK, and Gunter C
- Subjects
- Congresses as Topic organization & administration, Female, Humans, Male, Research Personnel statistics & numerical data, Sex Factors, Societies, Scientific organization & administration, Communication, Congresses as Topic statistics & numerical data, Natural Science Disciplines standards, Public Opinion, Research Personnel psychology, Societies, Scientific statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Women are under-represented in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Despite the recent emphasis on diversity in STEM, our understanding of what drives differences between women and men scientists remains limited. This, in turn, limits our ability to intervene to level the playing field. To quantify the representation and participation of women and men at academic meetings in human genetics, we developed high-throughput and crowd-sourced approaches focused on question-asking behavior. Question asking is one voluntary and self-initiated scientific activity we can measure. Here we report that women ask fewer questions than expected regardless of their representation in talk audiences. We present evidence that external barriers affect the representation of women in STEM. However, differences in question-asking behavior suggest that internal factors also impact women's participation. We then examine the effects of specific interventions and show that wide public discussion of the relative under-participation of women in question-and-answer sessions alters question-asking behavior. We suggest that engaging the community in such projects promotes visibility of diversity issues at academic meetings and allows for efficient data collection that can be used to further explore and understand differences in conference participation., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF