Search

The composition of wine varietal volatiles (terpenes, norisoprenoids, etc.), expressions of distinctive vine genetic characteristics, was determined in some southern Italian wines. The aim was to tentatively identify specific quality and shelf-life molecular tracers, among compounds related to the grapevine biodiversity, and to observe their modifications under different storage conditions. During the shelf-life of bottled Fiano wine samples, high temperatures produced an increase of terpene interconversion and degradation. p-Cymene and some terpenyl oxides (linalool oxide and limonene oxide) were also produced which appeared as shelf-life molecular markers. In Aglianico wine samples, some terpene compounds (α-pinene, β-myrcene, 3-carene, 4-carene, limonene and linalool) acted as possible process markers during the ageing step. In autochthonous Ischia varieties, terpene compounds also acted as suitable indicators of geographical origin. The data obtained showed that some volatile compounds could be potential analytical tools for checking, saving and improving the quality of typical wines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Little research has investigated how sex may affect the prognosis of patients with chronic heart failure (HF). The present study was aimed at exploring sex-specific differences in prognosis in a cohort of patients with chronic HF, categorized according to severity of left ventricular dysfunction (HFrEF, HFmrEF and HFpEF), right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and ischemic (IHD) or nonischemic (no-IHD) etiology., Methods: This retrospective analysis included 1640 HF patients of whom 24% were females, 759 patients had IHD, 1110 patients had HFrEF, 147 patients had HFmrEF and 383 patients had HFpEF. The median follow-up period was 63 months (25th-75th 27-93)., Results: In the no-IHD group, no statistically significant sex differences emerged regarding survival, regardless of age and severity of cardiac dysfunction. In contrast, in the IHD group, females had a significantly lower event rate than males in the age group between 65 and 79 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.18; P  < 0.01]; in addition, a lower event rate was observed in females compared with males among patients with HFrEF (HR 0.47; 95% CI: 0.88-0.25; P  < 0.01), among patients without RV dysfunction (HR 0.58; 95% CI: 1.02-0.33; P  = 0.048) and among patients without diabetes (HR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.84-0.23; P  < 0.01)., Conclusion: In nonischemic patients there was no difference between males and females in terms of survival whereas in patients with ischemic etiology survival was better in females among elderly patients, in HFrEF patients, in the absence of RV dysfunction and in the absence of diabetes., (Copyright © 2024 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Risk stratification has gained an increasing role in predicting outcomes and guiding the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The most predictive prognostic factors are three noninvasive parameters (World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walk distance and natriuretic peptides) that are included in all currently validated risk stratification tools. However, suffering from limitations mainly related to reduced specificity of PAH severity, these variables may not always be adequate in isolation for guiding individualised treatment decisions. Moreover, with effective combination treatment regimens and emerging PAH therapies, markers associated with pulmonary vascular remodelling are expected to become of increasing relevance in guiding the treatment of patients with PAH. While reaching a low mortality risk, assessed with a validated risk tool, remains an important treatment goal, preliminary data suggest that invasive haemodynamics and cardiac imaging may add incremental value in guiding treatment decisions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: F. Dardi reports consultancy fees from Janssen and Chiesi Farmaceutici, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen. A. Boucly reports grants from Acceleron, Janssen and MSD, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, Merck, AOP Orphan, Ferrer and AstraZeneca, and support for attending meetings from Janssen, MSD, Ferrer and AOP Orphan. R. Benza reports consultancy fees from Cereno, Gossamer and United Therapeutics, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with Altavant. R. Frantz reports grants from NHLBI and Gossamer Bio, royalties or licences from UpToDate, consultancy fees from Gossamer Bio, Insmed, Merck and Liquidia, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with Aerovate Pharmaceuticals, leadership role with Pulmonary Hypertension Association Scientific Leadership Council, and stock (or stock options) with Merck. V. Mercurio reports consultancy fees from MSD, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, and support for attending meetings from Janssen and MSD. H. Olschewski reports consultancy fees from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Janssen, MSD, Chiesi, GSK, Inventiva, Ferrer, Menarini and Sanofi, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Springer, Medupdate and Mondial, support for attending meetings from Boehringer, Menarini and MSD, participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with Aerovate, Bayer, Pfizer and IQVIA, receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from Boehringer, and the following financial (or non-financial) interests: Deputy Director, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Lung Vascular Research, Graz. G. Rådegran reports grants from Nordic Infucare, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen, MSD, Nodic Infucare and Orpha Care/AOP Health, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with Janssen, MSD and Orpha Care/AOP Health. L.J. Rubin reports consultancy fees from Gossamer and SoniVie, payment for expert testimony from Sandoz, and is a member of the Organizing and Founders Committees, WSPH. M.M. Hoeper reports consultancy fees from Acceleron, Actelion, AOP Health, Bayer, Ferrer, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Keros and MSD, and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from Actelion, AOP Health, Bayer, Ferrer, Janssen and MSD., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: V.M. has received honoraria or consultation fees from MSD, outside of the submitted work. C.G.T. has received honoraria or consultation fees from VivaLyfe, Univers Formazione, Solaris, Summeet, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, and Myocardial Solutions, and funding from Amgen and MSD, outside the submitted work, and is listed as an inventor of two patents related to heart failure.

Background: Right ventricular (RV) imaging has not a definite role in risk stratification of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients. We tested the hypothesis that echocardiography-derived phenotypes, depicting different degrees of RV remodeling and dysfunction, may provide additional prognostic information to current risk stratification tools., Methods: Consecutive incident PAH patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed between January 2005 and December 2021, underwent clinical assessment, right heart catheterization, standard echocardiography. Simple echocardiographic variables were combined in order to define a priori four phenotypes representing different degrees of RV dilatation and RV-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling: Phenotype 1 with mildy dilated right ventricle and preserved RV-PA coupling (n = 152 patients); phenotype 2 with mildly dilated right ventricle and poor RV-PA coupling (n = 143 patients); phenotype 3 with severely dilated right ventricle and preserved RV-PA coupling (n = 201 patients); phenotype 4 with severely dilated right ventricle and poor RV-PA coupling, with or without severe tricuspid regurgitation (n = 519 patients). Risk stratification was based on the European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) 3-strata model and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-Term PAH disease Management (REVEAL) 2.0 score., Results: These phenotypes were present in all risk groups. Notably, regardless of the ESC/ERS risk stratum assigned to the patient, phenotype 4 was associated with a 2-fold increase of the odds of death (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6-2.8, p < 0.001), while phenotype 1 was associated with a 71% reduction in the odds of dying (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.18-0.47, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Echocardiography-derived phenotypes describing RV remodeling and dysfunction may provide prognostic information which is independent of and additional to the clinically defined risk in incident PAH patients., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The present study gathers mineralogical and isotopic geochemical data of 45 soil samples collected from the La Guardiense and Cantina di Solopaca wineries (Southern Italy) in order to provide useful information for the geotraceability of Falanghina white wine terroir . Mineralogical analyses show the ubiquitous presence of quartz, frequent and moderate contents of feldspars and phyllosilicates (i.e., illite/mica, kaolinite, and smectite). Rhizosphere soils from La Guardiense vineyards show a strontium isotope signature ( 87 Sr/ 86 Sr) ranging from 0.708604 to 0.711234 (average 0.710334; 1σ = 0.000943; n = 7) for the total fraction and a narrower range (from 0.706907 to 0.708807; average 0.708120; 1σ = 0.000641; n = 7) for the bioavailable one. For the rhizosphere soils collected from the vineyards of Cantina di Solopaca winery, 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios range from 0.708268 to 0.712413 (average 0.710145; 1σ = 0.001622; n = 8) and from 0.707968 to 0.709157 (average 0.708384; 1σ = 0.000409; n = 8) for the total and the bioavailable fraction, respectively. Actually, the bioavailable Sr fraction shows a narrower range of 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios compared to that of the total fraction, making the former more suitable for any study of wine traceability., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: Right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and pulmonary hypertension have been recognized as two important prognostic features in patients with left side heart failure. Current literature does not distinguish between right heart failure (RHF) and RVD, and the two terms are used indiscriminately to describe pulmonary hypertension and RVD as well as clinical sign of RHF. Therefore, the right ventricle (RV) adaptation across the whole spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) values has been poorly investigated., Methods: This is a multicenter observational prospective study endorsed by the Italian Society of Cardiology aiming to analyze the concordance between the signs and symptoms of RHF and echocardiographic features of RVD. The protocol will assess patients affected by chronic heart failure in stable condition regardless of the LVEF threshold by clinical, laboratory, and detailed echocardiographic study. During the follow-up period, patients will be observed by direct check-up visit and/or virtual visits every 6 months for a mean period of 3 years. All clinical laboratory and echocardiographic data will be recorded in a web platform system accessible for all centers included in the study., Results: The main study goals are: to investigate the concordance and discordance between clinical signs of RHF and RVD measured by ultrasonographic examination; to evaluate prognostic impact (in terms of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization) of RVD and RHF during a mean follow-up period of 3 years; to investigate the prevalence of different right ventricular maladaptation (isolated right ventricular dilatation, isolated pulmonary hypertension, combined pattern) and the related prognostic impact., Conclusions: With this protocol, we would investigate the three main RVD patterns according to heart failure types and stages; we would clarify different RVD and pulmonary hypertension severity according to the heart failure types. Additionally, by a serial multiparametric analysis of RV, we would provide a better definition of RVD stage and how much is it related with clinical signs of RHF (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06002321)., (Copyright © 2024 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), treatment with sacubitril-valsartan (S/V) may reverse left ventricular remodeling (rLVR). Whether this effect is superior to that induced by other renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors is not well known., Methods: HFrEF patients treated with S/V (n = 795) were compared, by propensity score matching, with a historical cohort of 831 HFrEF patients (non-S/V group) treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (RAS inhibitors). All patients were also treated with beta-blockers and shared the same protocol with repeat echocardiogram 8-12 months after starting therapy. The difference-in-difference (DiD) analysis was used to evaluate the impact of S/V on CR indices between the two groups., Results: After propensity score matching, compared to non-S/V group (n = 354), S/V group (n = 354) showed a relative greater reduction in end-diastolic and end-systolic volume index (ESVI), and greater increase in ejection fraction (DiD estimator =  + 5.42 mL/m 2 , P = 0.0005; + 4.68 mL/m 2 , P = 0.0009, and + 1.76%, P = 0.002, respectively). Reverse LVR (reduction in ESVI ≥ 15% from baseline) was more prevalent in S/V than in non-S/V group (34% vs 26%, P = 0.017), while adverse LVR (aLVR, increase in ESVI at follow-up ≥ 15%) was more frequent in non-S/V than in S/V (16% vs 7%, P < 0.001). The beneficial effect of S/V on CR over other RAS inhibitors was appreciable across a wide range of patient's age and baseline end-diastolic volume index, but it tended to attenuate in more dilated left ventricles (P for interaction = NS for both)., Conclusion: In HFrEF patients treated with beta-blockers, sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a relative greater benefit in LV reverse remodeling indices than other RAS inhibitors., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare subtype of group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH) diseases, characterized by high pulmonary artery pressure leading to right ventricular dysfunction and potential life-threatening consequences. PAH involves complex mechanisms: vasoconstriction, vascular remodeling, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrosis, RV remodeling, cellular hypoxia, metabolic imbalance, and thrombosis. These mechanisms are mediated by several pathways, involving molecules like nitric oxide and prostacyclin. PAH diagnosis requires clinical evaluation and right heart catheterization, confirming a value of mPAP ≥ 20 mmHg at rest and often elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Even if an early and accurate diagnosis is crucial, PAH still lacks effective biomarkers to assist in its diagnosis and prognosis. Biomarkers could contribute to arousing clinical suspicion and serve for prognosis prediction, risk stratification, and dynamic monitoring in patients with PAH. The aim of the present review is to report the main novelties on new possible biomarkers for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring of PAH.

Heart failure (HF) has become a subject of continuous interest since it was declared a new pandemic in 1997 because of the exponential increase in hospitalizations for HF in the latest years. HF is the final state to which all heart diseases of different etiologies lead if not adequately treated. It is highly prevalent worldwide, with a progressive increase with age, reaching a prevalence of 10% in subjects over the age of 65 years. During the last two decades, it was possible to see that the prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was increasing while that of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was decreasing. HFpEF is typically characterized by concentric remodeling of the left ventricle (LV) with impaired diastolic function and increased filling pressures. Over the years, also the prevalence of insulin resistance (IR)/hyperinsulinemia (Hyperins) in the general adult population has progressively increased, primarily due to lifestyle changes, particularly in developed and developing countries, with a range that globally ranges between 15.5% and 46.5%. Notably, over 50% of patients with HF also have IR/Hyperins, and the percentage is even higher in those with HFpEF. In the scientific literature, it has been well highlighted that the increased circulating levels of insulin, associated with conditions of insulin resistance, are responsible for progressive cardiovascular alterations over the years that could stimulate the development and/or the worsening of HFpEF. The aim of this manuscript was to review the scientific literature that supports a pathophysiologic connection between IR/Hyperins and HFpEF to stimulate the scientific community toward the identification of hyperinsulinemia associated with insulin resistance as an independent cardiovascular risk factor in the development and worsening of HF, believing that its adequate screening in the general population and an appropriate treatment could reduce the prevalence of HFpEF and improve its progression.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) associated with left heart failure (LHF) (PH-LHF) is one of the most common causes of PH. It directly contributes to symptoms and reduced functional capacity and negatively affects right heart function, ultimately leading to a poor prognosis. There are no specific treatments for PH-LHF, despite the high number of drugs tested so far. This scientific document addresses the main knowledge gaps in PH-LHF with emphasis on pathophysiology and clinical trials. Key identified issues include better understanding of the role of pulmonary venous versus arteriolar remodelling, multidimensional phenotyping to recognize patient subgroups positioned to respond to different therapies, and conduct of rigorous pre-clinical studies combining small and large animal models. Advancements in these areas are expected to better inform the design of clinical trials and extend treatment options beyond those effective in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Enrichment strategies, endpoint assessments, and thorough haemodynamic studies, both at rest and during exercise, are proposed to play primary roles to optimize early-stage development of candidate therapies for PH-LHF., (© 2024 European Society of Cardiology.)

Cardiovascular mortality is still excessively high, despite the considerable progress made in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Although many cardiovascular risk factors (such as arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, etc.), identified in the general population, are being promptly treated, to date little consideration is given to a cardiovascular risk factor which we believe has largely demonstrated in the scientific literature of the last three decades that, if neglected, can produce a series of relevant negative effects on the cardiovascular system: insulin resistance (IR)/hyperinsulinemia (Hyperins). This risk factor is still not sufficently sought in the general population and, consequently, is not treated promptly, as it should be, to avoid its negative impact on the cardiovascular system. IR's prevalence is constantly growing worldwide, and it is estimated to have reached a prevalence of 51% of the general population in developed and developing countries, and Hyperins is a constant and strong feature of IR. This article aims to stimulate the scientific community towards IR/Hyperins as relevant cardiovascular risk factor, since it is still neglected. The scientific literature analyzed and used to for this article was found on PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, etc, using the following keywords: insulin, insulin signaling, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia, cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular system, cardiovascular diseases. We selected studies that explored the association between IR/Hyperins and the cardiovascular system, and those that discussed the possibilities of screening and treatment of IR/Hyperins., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision., (© 2024 Fazio, Mercurio, Tibullo, Fazio and Affuso.)

Heart failure (HF) is a progressive condition with a clinical picture resulting from reduced cardiac output (CO) and/or elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressures (LVFP). The original Diamond-Forrester classification, based on haemodynamic data reflecting CO and pulmonary congestion, was introduced to grade severity, manage, and risk stratify advanced HF patients, providing evidence that survival progressively worsened for those classified as warm/dry, cold/dry, warm/wet, and cold/wet. Invasive haemodynamic evaluation in critically ill patients has been replaced by non-invasive haemodynamic phenotype profiling using echocardiography. Decreased CO is not infrequent among ambulatory HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, ranging from 23 to 45%. The Diamond-Forrester classification may be used in combination with the evaluation of natriuretic peptides (NPs) in ambulatory HF patients to pursue the goal of early identification of those at high risk of adverse events and personalise therapy to antagonise neurohormonal systems, reduce congestion, and preserve tissue/renal perfusion. The most benefit of the Guideline-directed medical treatment is to be expected in stable patients with the warm/dry profile, who more often respond with LV reverse remodelling, while more selective individualised treatments guided by echocardiography and NPs are necessary for patients with persisting congestion and/or tissue/renal hypoperfusion (cold/dry, warm/wet, and cold/wet phenotypes) to achieve stabilization and to avoid further neurohormonal activation, as a result of inappropriate use of vasodilating or negative chronotropic drugs, thus pursuing the therapeutic objectives. Therefore, tracking the haemodynamic status over time by clinical, imaging, and laboratory indicators helps implement therapy by individualising drug regimens and interventions according to patients' phenotypes even in an ambulatory setting., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

In recent years, important advances have been made in the field of Cardio-Oncology. The 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology proposed a baseline cardiovascular risk stratification for cancer patients and preventive strategies in patients at high and very-high risk of cardiotoxicity. Cardiovascular toxic effects of anti-cancer drugs are being extensively studied; surveillance programs have been proposed, based on the baseline cardiovascular risk. On the other hand, there is little data on Cardio-Oncological management of patients at high and very-high cardiovascular risk with previous cardiovascular diseases. For example, little is known about management of cancer patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), patients with a recent myocardial infarction or other cardiovascular diseases; when to resume anti-cancer drugs after a cardiovascular toxic event. Collaboration between Cardiologists and Oncologists and multidisciplinary team evaluations are certainly essential to decide the best therapeutic strategy for cancer patients, to treat cancer while saving the heart. Therefore, in the present review, we attempt to provide a useful guide to clinicians in treating patients with high and very-high risk of cardiotoxicity by enucleating main questions and answering them based on the evidence available as well as expert opinion and our clinical experience., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest CGT reports honoraria or consultation fees from VivaLyfe, Univers Formazione, Solaris, Summeet, Astra Zeneca, Myocardial Solutions, Medtronic; funding from Amgen and MSD, outside the submitted work; and is listed as an inventor of two patents related to heart failure., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Serum biomarkers represent a reproducible, sensitive, minimally invasive and inexpensive method to explore possible adverse cardiovascular effects of antineoplastic treatments. They are useful tools in risk stratification, the early detection of cardiotoxicity and the follow-up and prognostic assessment of cancer patients. In this literature review, we aim at describing the current state of knowledge on the meaning and the usefulness of cardiovascular biomarkers in patients with cancer; analyzing the intricate relationship between cancer and cardiovascular disease (especially HF) and how this affects cardiovascular and tumor biomarkers; exploring the role of cardiovascular biomarkers in the risk stratification and in the identification of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity; and providing a summary of the novel potential biomarkers in this clinical setting.

This manuscript on real-world evidence (RWE) in pulmonary hypertension (PH) incorporates the broad experience of members of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative Real-World Evidence Working Group. We aim to strengthen the research community's understanding of RWE in PH to facilitate clinical research advances and ultimately improve patient care. Herein, we review real-world data (RWD) sources, discuss challenges and opportunities when using RWD sources to study PH populations, and identify resources needed to support the generation of meaningful RWE for the global PH community., Competing Interests: Boucly reports consulting fees from AOP Orphan; payment, honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AOP Orphan, MSD, and Janssen; and support for attending meetings/travel from MSD and Janssen. Moles reports grants or contracts from Acceleron Pharma, Janssen, and CVS Caremark; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee, or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for Gossamer Bio. Elwing reports grants or contracts from United Therapeutics Corporation, Gossamer Bio, Bayer, Acceleron/Merck, Altavant, Aerovate, Tenax, Pharmosa, Actelion/Janssen, Arena, Lung, Liquidia, and Phase Bio; consulting fees for United Therapeutics Corporation; support for attending meetings and/or travel for United Therapeutics, Altavant, Aerovate, Bayer, Gossamer Bio, Liquida, Acceleron/Merck, Janssen/Actelion, and Insmed; and other financial or nonfinancial interests from Bayer as a grant reviewer. Jose reports grants or contracts from Team Phenomenal Hope Charity, Francis Family Foundation, United Therapeutics, and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson. Alves Jr. reports payment or honoraria from Bayer and Janssen; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen. Minty reports consulting fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals and Orpyx Medical Technologies; and stock or stock options from Orpyx Medical Technologies. Weatherald reports grants or contracts from Janssen, Bayer, Merck, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, and the Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada; consulting fees from Janssen and Merck; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen and Merck; payment for expert testimony from Sprigings Intellectual Property Law; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Janssen; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Janssen, Acceleron, and Université Laval; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, from the Pulmonary Hypertension Association of Canada. Mathai reports grants or contracts from NIH/NHLBI (HL125175) and DOD (W81XWH‐20‐1‐0768); consulting fees from Actelion/Janssen, Aerovate, Merck, United Therapeutics Corporation, and Theravance; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from Bayer. Sahay reports grants or contracts from United Therapeutics Corporation, Janssen, Bayer, Merck, Liquidia, and Gossamer; consulting fees from Merck, Liquidia, and Gossamer; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from United Therapeutics Corporation (received by hospital rather than self); patents planned, issued, or pending with Janssen; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with GSK, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Janssen. Pulido reports grants or contracts from Janssen, MSD, and United Therapeutics; consulting fees from Janssen, Bayer, Gossamer, and MSD; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Bayer, Janssen, and Pfizer. Badagliacca reports grants or contracts from United Therapeutics Corporation, Ferrer, and Janssen; consulting fees from MSD, United Therapeutics Corporation, Ferrer, Janssen, and AOP; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from MSD, United Therapeutics Corporation, Ferrer, Janssen, and AOP; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from MSD, United Therapeutics Corporation, Ferrer, Janssen, and AOP. Cirulis reports grants or contracts from Entelligence (now ATS); and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, with ATS Web Committee Co‐Director and ATS Program Committee. Gerges reports grants or contracts from AOP Health; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from AOP Health, Actelion/Janssen, and Ferrer; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from AOP Health, Actelion/Janssen, Ferrer, Daiichi Sankyo, and MSD. Gillmeyer reports grants or contracts from Parker B. Francis Fellowship Award, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Award, and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (BU‐CTSI Grant Number 1UL1TR001430); and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, for the American Thoracic Society Program Committee (unpaid). Hobohm reports consulting fees for Janssen, Boston Consulting, and MSD. Lau reports grants or contracts from Janssen and GSK; consulting fees for Janssen; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Janssen. Morland reports grants or contracts from United Therapeutics Corporation; leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, from the PVRI Innovative Drug Development Initiative (unpaid); and stock or stock options from United Therapeutics Corporation. Nikkho reports grants or contracts from Bayer AG; and leadership or fiduciary role in other board, society, committee or advocacy group, paid or unpaid, from the PVRI Innovative Drug Development Initiative (unpaid). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2023 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Sulfanylbenzamide thioesters are molecules with anti-HIV activity that disrupt zinc coordination in the viral protein NCp7. These molecules are useful as topical microbicides; however, they are too unstable to be used systemically. In this article, a nitroimidazole prodrug was used to protect the sulfanylbenzamide to convey blood stability and oral bioavailability to the molecule. Studies on the molecule called nipamovir were performed to assess the rate of prodrug cleavage, antiviral activity, mechanism of metabolism, and in vivo pharmacokinetics in several different species. An efficient and inexpensive synthesis of nipamovir is also described. The results indicate that nipamovir could be further developed as a new type of drug to treat HIV infection., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing financial interest., (Not subject to U.S. Copyright. Published 2023 by American Chemical Society.)

This opinion article highlights the potential alterations caused by insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia on the cardiovascular system and their negative impact on heart failure (HF), and describes the potential benefits of an early screening with consequent prompt treatment. HF is the final event of several different cardiovascular diseases. Its incidence has been increasing over the last decades because of increased survival from ischemic heart disease thanks to improvements in its treatment (including myocardial revascularization interventions) and the increase in life span. In particular, incidence of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is significantly increasing, and patients with HFpEF often are also affected by diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance (IR), with a prevalence > 45%. Concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling and diastolic dysfunction are the main structural abnormalities that characterize HFpEF. It is well documented in the literature that IR with chronic hyperinsulinemia, besides causing type 2 diabetes mellitus, can cause numerous cardiovascular alterations, including endothelial dysfunction and increased wall thicknesses of the left ventricle with concentric remodeling and diastolic dysfunction. Therefore, it is conceivable that IR might play a major role in the pathophysiology and the progressive worsening of HF. To date, several substances have been shown to reduce IR/hyperinsulinemia and have beneficial clinical effects in patients with HF, including SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, and berberine. For this reason, an early screening of IR could be advisable in subjects at risk and in patients with heart failure, to promptly intervene with appropriate therapy. Future studies aimed at comparing the efficacy of the substances used both alone and in association are needed.

Competing Interests: CT reports honoraria or consultation fees from VivaLyfe, Univers Formazione, Solaris, Summeet, Astra Zeneca, Myocardial Solutions; funding from Amgen and MSD, outside the submitted work; and is listed as an inventor of two patents related to HF. GV reports research support from AstraZeneca International. LF reports support from Lilly. TT reports support from Novartis BMS, Pfizer, Amgen, Merck, Sanofi, MSD. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer AG declared past co-authorships with the authors CGT, VM, AC, GV, and, RM to the handling editor. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Objectives: An increasing number of COVID-19 patients were treated with continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP). To evaluate the clinical effects of personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to standard fixed PEEP in COVID-19 patients requiring CPAP., Methods: This is a single center, prospective, randomized clinical study. Sixty-three COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and bilateral pneumonia were randomized in two Groups: Group A received CPAP with fixed PEEP of 10 cm H 2 O, Group B performed the "PEEP trial", that consists in the evaluation of best PEEP defined as the PEEP value that precedes the echographic appearance of "lung pulse" determining a PaO 2 /FiO 2 increase. Primary outcome was composite in-hospital mortality + intubation, secondary outcome was the percentage increase of PaO 2 /FiO 2 . As safety indicator, the incidence of pneumothorax was collected., Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in Group A and 31 in Group B . The two groups were comparable for clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters. The primary outcome occurred in 36 (57.1 %) patients: 23 (71.8 %) in Group A and 13 (41.9 %) in Group B (p<0.01). Mortality was higher in Group A (53.1 vs. 19.3 %, p<0.01), while intubation rate was comparable between groups. Group B showed a higher PaO 2 /FiO 2 increase than Group A (34.9 vs. 13.1 %, p<0.01). Five cases of pneumothorax were reported in Group A , none in Group B ., Conclusions: Lung ultrasound-guided PEEP trial is associated with lower mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with CPAP. Identifying the best PEEP is useful to increase oxygenation and reduce the incidence of complications., (© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Right heart failure (RHF) is a clinical syndrome in which symptoms and signs are caused by dysfunction and/or overload of the right heart structures, predominantly the right ventricle (RV), resulting in systemic venous hypertension, peripheral oedema and finally, the impaired ability of the right heart to provide tissue perfusion. Pathogenesis of RHF includes the incompetence of the right heart to maintain systemic venous pressure sufficiently low to guarantee an optimal venous return and to preserve renal function. Virtually, all myocardial diseases involving the left heart may be responsible for RHF. This may result from coronary artery disease, hypertension, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathies and myocarditis. The most prominent clinical signs of RHF comprise swelling of the neck veins with an elevation of jugular venous pressure and ankle oedema. As the situation worsens, fluid accumulation becomes generalised with extensive oedema of the legs, congestive hepatomegaly and eventually ascites. Diagnosis of RHF requires the presence of signs of elevated right atrial and venous pressures, including dilation of neck veins, with at least one of the following criteria: (1) compromised RV function; (2) pulmonary hypertension; (3) peripheral oedema and congestive hepatomegaly. Early recognition of RHF and identifying the underlying aetiology as well as triggering factors are crucial to treating patients and possibly reversing the clinical manifestations effectively and improving prognosis., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

A strong, bidirectional relationship exists between diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) and DM is responsible of the activation of several molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms that may, on the long term, damage the heart. However, the prognostic role of DM in the context of chronic and acute HF is still not yet defined and there are several gaps of evidence in the literature on this topic. These gaps are related to the wide phenotypic heterogeneity of patients with chronic and acute HF and to the concept that not all diabetic patients are the same, but there is the necessity to better characterize the disease and each single patient, also considering the role of other possible comorbidities. The aim of the present review is to summarize the pathophysiological mechanisms subtending the negative effect of DM in HF and analyze the available data exploring the prognostic impact of such comorbidity in both chronic and acute HF., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)