151. The Impact of Microvascular Resistance Reserve on the Outcome of Patients With STEMI.
- Author
-
Tsai TY, Aldujeli A, Haq A, Knokneris A, Briedis K, Hughes D, Unikas R, Renkens M, Revaiah PC, Tobe A, Miyashita K, Sharif F, Garg S, Onuma Y, and Serruys PW
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Time Factors, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Coronary Vessels physiopathology, Coronary Vessels diagnostic imaging, Risk Assessment, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction physiopathology, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction therapy, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction mortality, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnosis, Microcirculation, Vascular Resistance, Predictive Value of Tests, Coronary Circulation, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects, Thermodilution, Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology, Coronary Artery Disease therapy, Coronary Artery Disease mortality, Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis
- Abstract
Background: Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) can characterize coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD); however, its prognostic impact in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients remains undefined., Objectives: This study sought to investigate the prevalence of CMD in STEMI patients and to elucidate the prognostic performance of MRR., Methods: This prospective cohort study enrolled 210 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent successful revascularization and returned at 3 months for coronary physiology assessments with bolus thermodilution. The prevalence of CMD (MRR <3) and the association between MRR and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) at 12 months were investigated., Results: The median age of patients was 65 years, and 59.5% were men. At the 3-month follow-up, 56 patients (27%) had CMD (MRR <3.0). The number of MACCEs at 12 months was higher in patients with vs without CMD (48.2% vs 11.0%; P < 0.001). MRR was independently associated with 12-month MACCEs (HR: 0.45 per unit increase; 95% CI: 0.31-0.67; P < 0.001) and with stroke, heart failure, and poorer recovery in left ventricular systolic function. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for predicting MACCEs at 12 months with fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve (CFR), the index of microvascular resistance (IMR), and MRR were 0.609, 0.762, 0.781, and 0.743, respectively. The prognostic performance of CFR, IMR, and MRR were all comparable., Conclusions: The novel parameter MRR is a prognostic marker of MACCEs in STEMI patients with a comparable performance to CFR and IMR. (Impact of TMAO Serum Levels on Hyperemic IMR in STEMI Patients [TAMIR]; NCT05406297)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The study was sponsored by the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Dr Aldujeli recently held shares in Pfizer Inc. Dr Unikas is the President of the National Interventional Cardiology Association of Lithuania. Dr Tobe has received research grants from the Fukuda Foundation for Medical Technology. Dr Miyashita has received research grants from OrbusNeich Medical K.K. outside the submitted work. Dr Sharif has received grants from SFI Infrastructure 17/RI/5353. Dr Garg has received consulting fees from Biosensors outside the submitted work. Dr Serruys has received consulting fees from SMT, Novartis, Xeltis, Merillife, and Philips outside the submitted work. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF