Search

The article discusses the role of vitamin D in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in metabolomics for genomics.

Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is the most severe form of alcohol-related liver disease. The natural course of alcohol-related liver disease is influenced by heavy alcohol consumption and abstinence periods. Differentiating between AH and decompensated cirrhosis (DC) could be extremely challenging in clinical practice due to clinical and bioclinical similarities. The severity of AH is made on bioclinical grounds, the severe form necessitating corticotherapy treatment. Liver biopsy is still the standard of care for establishing the diagnosis in atypical presentations. The pathogenesis of AH is an interplay between gene expression, cytokine dysregulation, the immune system and the gut microbiota. Non-invasive tests are increasingly and widely used for the purpose of early diagnosis and reliable prognostication. The non-invasive tests are emerging in concordance with disease pathogenesis. In this review, we describe the non-invasive tools that can distinguish AH from DC. We outline the available cut-offs and their performance in diagnosis and prognosis, as well as in assessing the treatment response to corticotherapy. Promising circulating biomarkers like keratin 18, microRNAs and sphingolipids will be in the review.

Purpose:  Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is responsible for most of the complications in patients with cirrhosis. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is currently used to evaluate CSPH. Bi-dimensional shear wave elastography from General Electric (2D-SWE.GE) has not yet been validated for the diagnosis of PHT. Our aims were to test whether 2D-SWE.GE-LS is able to evaluate CSPH, to determine the reliability criteria of the method and to compare its accuracy with that of VCTE-LS in this clinical setting., Materials and Methods:  Patients with chronic liver disease referred to hepatic catheterization (HVPG) were consecutively enrolled. HVPG and LS by both VCTE and 2D-SWE.GE were performed on the same day. The diagnostic performance of each LS method was compared against HVPG and between each other., Results:  2D-SWE.GE-LS was possible in 123/127 (96.90 %) patients. The ability to record at least 5 LS measurements by 2D-SWE.GE and IQR < 30 % were the only features associated with reliable results. 2D-SWE.GE-LS was highly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.704; p < 0.0001), especially if HVPG < 10 mmHg and was significantly higher in patients with CSPH (15.52 vs. 8.14 kPa; p < 0.0001). For a cut-off value of 11.3 kPa, the AUROC of 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was 0.91, which was not inferior to VCTE-LS (0.92; p = 0.79). The diagnostic accuracy of LS by 2D-SWE.GE-LS to detect CSPH was similar with the one of VCTE-LS (83.74 % vs. 85.37 %; p = 0.238). The diagnostic accuracy was not enhanced by using different cut-off values which enhanced the sensitivity or the specificity. However, in the subgroup of compensated patients with alcoholic liver disease, 2D-SWE.GE-LS classified CSPH better than VCTE-LS (93.33 % vs. 85.71 %, p = 0.039)., Conclusion:  2D-SWE.GE-LS has good accuracy, not inferior to VCTE-LS, for the diagnosis of CSPH., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bacterial infections impair prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. Presepsin and, more recently, resistin are promising markers of infection and sepsis in patients without cirrhosis., Aims: The aim of our study was to assess the performance of presepsin and resistin as early markers of infection compared with C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), and their prognostic relevance in patients with decompensated cirrhosis., Methods: One hundred and fourteen consecutive patients with decompensated cirrhosis were enrolled and followed-up for 28 days. Diagnostic performances of CRP, PCT, presepsin and resistin were assessed., Results: Fifty-three (46.5%) patients had bacterial infections of which 30 (56%) had sepsis. Presepsin and resistin had similar performance as CRP and PCT for the diagnosis of infection (best cut-off of 1444 pg/ml and 20 ng/ml, respectively) and sepsis. Presepsin (HR = 5.5; 95%CI: 2.36-13.21, p < 0.0001) and the ≥500 pg/ml increase of presepsin at 48 h (HR = 9.24; 95%CI: 3.66-23.27, p < 0.008) were independently associated with 28-day mortality., Conclusions: Presepsin and resistin have similar diagnostic performances to CRP and PCT for bacterial infection in decompensated cirrhosis. Presepsin and Δ presepsin ≥500 pg/ml have also a prognostic relevance for 28-day mortality., (Copyright © 2019 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Both liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) are widely used to non-invasively assess liver fibrosis and portal hypertension, respectively. We aimed to identify the impact of disease etiology, namely the localization of inflammation (portal vs. lobular), on the SS/LS ratio., Methods: In this multicenter study, LS and SS were prospectively assessed in 411 patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) using FibroScan® (Echosens, Paris); changes in these parameters were also studied in response to treatment (alcohol withdrawal, HCV therapy). LS and spleen length (SL) were further analyzed in a retrospective cohort of 449 patients with long-term data on decompensation/death., Results: Both, SS and SL were significantly higher in HCV compared to ALD (42.0 vs. 32.6 kPa, p≪ 0.0001, 15.6 vs. 11.9 cm, p≪ 0.0001) despite a lower mean LS in HCV. Consequently, the SS to LS ratio and the SL to LS ratio were significantly higher in HCV (3.8 vs. 1.72 and 1.46 vs. 0.86, p≪ 0.0001) through all fibrosis stages. Notably, SL linearly increased with SS and the relation between SS and SL was identical in HCV and ALD. In contrast, livers were much larger in ALD at comparable LS. After treatment, LS significantly decreased in both diseases without significant changes to the SS/LS ratio. In the prognostic cohort, patients with ALD had higher LS values (30.5 vs. 21.3 kPa) and predominantly presented with jaundice (65.2%); liver failure was the major cause of death ( p≪ 0.01). In contrast, in HCV, spleens were larger (17.6 vs. 12.1 cm) while variceal bleeding was the major cause of decompensation (73.2%) and death ( p≪ 0.001)., Conclusion: Both SS/LS and SL/LS ratios are significantly higher in patients with portal HCV compared to lobular ALD. Thus, combined LS and SS or SL measurements provide additional information about disease etiology and disease-specific complications., Lay Summary: Herein, we show that patients with hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) have higher spleen stiffness and portal pressure than patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), within the same fibrosis stage and matched to liver stiffness. Thus, the spleen stiffness to liver stiffness ratio is significantly higher in patients with HCV compared to ALD. Additionally, patients with HCV more commonly progress to portal hypertension-related complications ( e.g. variceal bleeding), while patients with ALD more commonly progress to liver failure ( e.g. jaundice). The spleen stiffness to liver stiffness ratio is a useful tool to confirm disease etiology and predict disease-specific complications., (Crown Copyright © 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).)

Esophageal varices (EVs) are among the most severe complications of cirrhosis, with a prevalence of 50% to 60% among cirrhotic patients. International guidelines therefore recommend that cirrhotic patients should be screened for the presence of EVs. The main objective of this study was to introduce a new spleen-dedicated FibroScan (Echosens, Paris, France) examination and to assess its performance in detecting large EVs (grade 2 and 3). This novel examination has been validated in simulation and phantom studies and has been used in a population of patients with chronic liver disease. The study described here suggests that the novel spleen-dedicated FibroScan examination performs better than the standard FibroScan for the detection of large EVs (area under the curve = 0.70 for the standard examination and 0.79 [p <0.01] for the spleen examination), but further clinical studies are needed to investigate the role of spleen stiffness in the management of cirrhotic patients., (Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) can safely avoid screening endoscopy with a platelet count >150 × 10 9 cells/L and a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) <20 kPa (Baveno VI criteria). However, the total number of avoided endoscopies using this rule is relatively low. We aimed at expanding the Baveno VI criteria and validating them in additional cohorts. Patients from the Anticipate cohort (499 patients with cACLD of different etiologies) were used to study the performance of different thresholds of platelets and LSM for the identification of patients at very low risk (<5%) of having varices needing treatment (VNT). The new criteria (Expanded-Baveno VI) were validated in two additional cohorts from London (309 patients) and Barcelona (117 patients). The performance of the new criteria by etiology of cACLD was also assessed. The best new expanded classification rule was platelet count >110 × 10 9 cells/L and LSM <25 kPa. This was validated in the two additional cohorts. Overall, the Expanded-Baveno VI criteria would potentially spare 367 (40%) endoscopies (21% with Baveno VI criteria) with a risk of missing VNT of 1.6% (95% confidence interval, 0.7%-3.5%) in patients within the criteria and 0.6% (95% confidence interval, 0.3%-1.4%) in the overall population of 925 patients evaluated. The Expanded-Baveno VI criteria performed well in patients with cACLD with hepatitis C virus and alcoholic and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis., Conclusion: The new Expanded-Baveno VI criteria spare more endoscopies than the original criteria with a minimal risk of missing VNT in most of the main etiologies of cACLD. (Hepatology 2017;66:1980-1988)., (© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: The diagnostic performance of biochemical scores and artificial neural network models for portal hypertension and cirrhosis is not well established., Aims: To assess diagnostic accuracy of six serum scores, artificial neural networks and liver stiffness measured by transient elastography, for diagnosing cirrhosis, clinically significant portal hypertension and oesophageal varices., Methods: 202 consecutive compensated patients requiring liver biopsy and hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement were included. Several serum tests (alone and combined into scores) and liver stiffness were measured. Artificial neural networks containing or not liver stiffness as input variable were also created., Results: The best non-invasive method for diagnosing cirrhosis, portal hypertension and oesophageal varices was liver stiffness (C-statistics=0.93, 0.94, and 0.90, respectively). Among serum tests/scores the best for diagnosing cirrhosis and portal hypertension and oesophageal varices were, respectively, Fibrosis-4, and Lok score. Artificial neural networks including liver stiffness had high diagnostic performance for cirrhosis, portal hypertension and oesophageal varices (accuracy>80%), but were not statistically superior to liver stiffness alone., Conclusions: Liver stiffness was the best non-invasive method to assess the presence of cirrhosis, portal hypertension and oesophageal varices. The use of artificial neural networks integrating different non-invasive tests did not increase the diagnostic accuracy of liver stiffness alone., (Copyright © 2015 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: Transient elastography (TE) is a noninvasive method for predicting liver fibrosis, mainly validated in patients with viral hepatitis. Information is still limited concerning its performance in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) patients. We aimed to assess the value of TE in the prediction of fibrosis stage in NASH as well as the factors determining the discordance between the TE-predicted and the biopsy-proven fibrosis stage in these patients., Methods: Liver biopsy and TE were performed on 72 consecutive NASH patients. Fibrosis, lobular inflammation, ballooning and steatosis were evaluated (Brunt system)., Results: Liver stiffness (LS) values ranged from 2.80 to 16.90 kPa. In the univariate analysis, LS was correlated with fibrosis (r=0.661; p<0.0001), steatosis (r=0.435, p<0.0001), ballooning (r=0.385; p=0.001) and lobular inflammation (r=0.364; p=0.002). In multivariate analysis, only fibrosis significantly correlated with LS (p<0.0001). The median (and range) LS values (kPa) according to the fibrosis stages were: 4.90 (2.80-7.30) for F0; 6.15 (4.80-12.50) for F1; 6.90 (3.30-16.90) for F2 and 14.00 (10.70-14.10) for F3, with significant difference between stages, except for F1-F2 (p=0.249). Cut off values were calculated for predicting each fibrosis stage: 5.3 kPa (AUROC=0.879) for F1; 6.8 kPa (AUROC=0.789) for F2; and 10.4 kPa (AUROC=0.978) for F3. Patients with false-positive results had a significantly higher ALT level than those with concordant results (p=0.039)., Conclusion: In NASH patients, TE allows a reliable assessment and prediction of liver fibrosis, especially in advanced stages. Steatosis, ballooning and inflammation do not influence liver stiffness.