Search

Background: The pulmonary phenotype in cystic fibrosis (CF) is variable; thus, environmental and genetic factors likely contribute to clinical heterogeneity. We hypothesized that genetically determined ABO histo-blood group antigen (ABH) differences in glycosylation may lead to differences in microbial binding by airway mucus, and thus predispose to early lung infection and more severe lung disease in a subset of patients with CF. Methods and Principal Findings: Clinical information and DNA was collected on >800 patients with the ΔF508/ΔF508 genotype. Patients in the most severe and mildest quartiles for lung phenotype were enrolled. Blood samples underwent lymphocyte transformation and DNA extraction using standard methods. PCR and sequencing were performed using standard techniques to identify the 9 SNPs required to determine ABO blood type, and to identify the four SNPs that account for 90-95% of Lewis status in Caucasians. Allele identification of the one nonsynonymous SNP in FUT2 that accounts for >95% of the incidence of nonsecretor phenotype in Caucasians was completed using an ABI Taqman assay. The overall prevalence of ABO types, and of FUT2 (secretor) and FUT 3 (Lewis) alleles was consistent with that found in the Caucasian population. There was no difference in distribution of ABH type in the severe versus mild patients, or the age of onset of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in the severe or mild groups. Multivariate analyses of other clinical phenotypes, including gender, asthma, and meconium ileus demonstrated no differences between groups based on ABH type. Conclusions and Significance: Polymorphisms in the genes encoding ABO blood type, secretor or Lewis genotypes were not shown to associate with severity of CF lung disease, or age of onset of P. aeruginosa infection, nor was there any association with other clinical phenotypes in a group of 808 patients homozygous for the ΔF508 mutation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators are available to the majority of people with CF in the United States; little is known about pregnancy outcomes with modulator use. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the impact of CFTR modulators on maternal outcomes. Does pregnancy differentially affect outcomes in female individuals with CF with and without CFTR modulator exposure? Data on pregnancies from 2010 to 2021 were collected from 11 US adult CF centers. Multivariable longitudinal regression analysis was performed to assess whether changes in percent predicted FEV 1 (ppFEV 1), BMI, pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence differed from prior to, during, and following pregnancy according to CFTR modulator use while adjusting for confounders. Infant outcomes are also described based on maternal modulator use. Among 307 pregnancies, mean age at conception was 28.5 years (range, 17-42 years), before pregnancy ppFEV 1 was 74.2, and BMI was 22.3 kg/m2. A total of 114 pregnancies (37.1%) had CFTR modulator exposure during pregnancy (77 with highly effective modulator therapy [HEMT] and 37 with other modulators). The adjusted mean change in ppFEV 1 from before pregnancy to during pregnancy was –2.36 (95% CI, –3.56 to –1.16) in the unexposed group and 2.60 (95% CI, 0.23 to 4.97) in the HEMT group, with no significant change from during pregnancy to 1 year after pregnancy. There was an overall decline in ppFEV 1 from before pregnancy to after pregnancy in the no modulator group (–2.56; 95% CI, –3.62 to –1.49) that was not observed in the HEMT group (1.10; 95% CI, –1.13 to 3.34). PEx decreased from before pregnancy to after pregnancy in the HEMT group, and BMI increased from before pregnancy to during pregnancy in all groups but with no significant change after pregnancy. Missing infant outcomes data precluded firm conclusions. We observed superior pregnancy and after pregnancy pulmonary outcomes in individuals who used HEMT, including a preservation of ppFEV 1 , compared with those unexposed to HEMT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Applications for CFTR modulators were submitted 103 days later in the EU than in the US. • The US ecosystem was faster in reviewing and approving CFTR modulators than the EU. • Differential approval timings refer to the different approaches to evidence by regulators. • The EU regulatory decision-making is more linked with national healthcare systems. • Changes in the EU pharma legislation aim to foster the review and approval of medicines. The objective of this study was to assess the differential times of submission and approval of CFTR modulators in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). By collecting publicly available data from the websites of the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, we quantified differential times in submission, review duration, and approvals of initial marketing authorization and variation of indications of CFTR modulators in the US and the EU by December 31, 2023. Applications regarding marketing of 4 CFTR modulators were submitted 103 (SD ±143) days later in the EU than in the US: 31 (SD ±39) days later for initial approval, and 124 (SD ±155) days for supplemental indications. The regulatory review process was completed in 181 days [IQR, 179 - 182] in the US and 325 days [IQR, 276 - 382] in the EU: 167 days [IQR, 102 - 232] in the US and 346 days [IQR, 302 - 400] in the EU for first approvals, 181 days [IQR, 181 - 182] in the US and 324 days [IQR, 264 - 382] in the EU for supplemental indication approvals. CFTR modulators were approved 267 (SD 143) days later in the EU than in the US: 220 (SD ±76) days for initial approval and 280 (SD ±157) days for supplemental indications. We found significant differences in times of submission and for approval of CFTR modulators between the US and EU, whereby initial approvals and subsequent indication approvals were always first granted in the US [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Many people with cystic fibrosis report olfactory problems when queried. • Olfactory quality of life impairment is prevalent in certain people with CF. • Improving olfactory dysfunction is an important problem for many people with CF. • Many people with CF are enthusiastic about participating in olfactory research. Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is prevalent in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF) and can negatively impact quality-of-life (QOL). This study evaluated perceptions of OD, investigated how OD impacts QOL, and assessed willingness to participate in OD research among the CF community. A 21-question survey was distributed through the CF Foundation's Community Voice program in 2023. The survey included questions on olfaction and interest in research. The Brief Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (BQOD), a validated person-reported outcome measure to assess QOL, was included. Seventy-six responses were received. Overall, 91% (69/76) reported olfactory problems. Mean BQOD score was 5.0 (standard deviation=4.8), indicating olfactory QOL impairment was present. Ninety-five percent (72/76) reported research on OD is worthwhile and were willing to participate in research. Among PwCF, OD and olfactory-specific QOL impairments are prevalent. There is strong interest and willingness to participate in OD research among the CF community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is commonly complicated by chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Despite highly effective management options, CRS in people with CF (PwCF+CRS) may be refractory to medical therapy, eventually requiring endoscopic sinus surgery. The impact of sinus surgery on pulmonary, quality of life (QOL), and other outcomes in PwCF+CRS in the expanding era of highly effective modulator therapy has not been fully elucidated. This study aims to determine if endoscopic sinus surgery can offer superior outcomes for PwCF+CRS when compared to continued medical treatment of CRS. Methods and analysis: This multi-institutional, observational, prospective cohort study will enroll 150 adults with PwCF+CRS across nine US CF Centers who failed initial medical therapy for CRS and elected to pursue either endoscopic sinus surgery or continue medical treatment. To determine if sinus surgery outperforms continued medical therapy in different outcomes, we will assess changes in pulmonary, CF-specific QOL, CRS-specific QOL, sleep quality, depression, headache, cognition, olfaction, productivity loss, and health utility value after treatment. The influence of highly effective modulator therapy on these outcomes will also be evaluated. This study will provide crucial insights into the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery for PwCF+CRS and aid with development of future treatment pathways and guidelines. Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by each institution's internal review board, and study enrollment began August 2019. Results will be disseminated in conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration: This study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04469439). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Iron deficiency is a common comorbidity in cystic fibrosis, despite CFTR modulators. • Highly-effective modulator therapy is associated with improved iron deficiency labs. • CFTR modulator therapy is associated with improved hemoglobin. • Sex differences exist in iron deficiency in cystic fibrosis. Iron deficiency (ID) is a common extrapulmonary manifestation in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies, particularly highly-effective modulator therapy (HEMT), have drastically improved health status in a majority of people with CF. We hypothesize that CFTR modulator use is associated with improved markers of ID. In a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 4 United States CF centers 2012–2022, the association between modulator therapies and ID laboratory outcomes was estimated using multivariable linear mixed effects models overall and by key subgroups. Summary statistics describe the prevalence and trends of ID, defined a priori as transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20 % or serum iron <60 μg/dL (<10.7 μmol/L). A total of 568 patients with 2571 person-years of follow-up were included in analyses. Compared to off modulator therapy, HEMT was associated with +8.4 % TSAT (95 % confidence interval [CI], +6.3–10.6 %; p < 0.0001) and +34.4 μg/dL serum iron (95 % CI, +26.7–42.1 μg/dL; p < 0.0001) overall; +5.4 % TSAT (95 % CI, +2.8–8.0 %; p = 0.0001) and +22.1 μg/dL serum iron (95 % CI, +13.5–30.8 μg/dL; p < 0.0001) in females; and +11.4 % TSAT (95 % CI, +7.9–14.8 %; p < 0.0001) and +46.0 μg/dL serum iron (95 % CI, +33.3–58.8 μg/dL; p < 0.0001) in males. Ferritin was not different in those taking modulator therapy relative to off modulator therapy. Hemoglobin was overall higher with use of modulator therapy. The prevalence of ID was high throughout the study period (32.8 % in those treated with HEMT). ID remains a prevalent comorbidity in CF, despite availability of HEMT. Modulator use, particularly of HEMT, is associated with improved markers for ID (TSAT, serum iron) and anemia (hemoglobin). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• First evaluation of acebilustat in a large, 48-week clinical trial. • Acebilustat was safe and well tolerated. • No significant benefit for spirometry or pulmonary exacerbations. • A beneficial trend in exacerbations for subjects with higher lung function and/or CFTR modulator use. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by neutrophilic inflammation in the airways. Leukotriene B4 (LTB 4) is a neutrophil chemoattractant and has been implicated in CF pathogenesis. Acebilustat, a novel, synthetic, small-molecule leukotriene A4 hydrolase inhibitor, reduces LTB 4 production. We report findings from a randomized placebo-controlled trial of acebilustat in adult subjects with mild-to-moderate lung disease. Subjects were randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily acebilustat 50 mg, 100 mg or placebo for 48 weeks, concomitantly with their current therapeutic regimen. Subjects were stratified by use of concomitant CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, baseline percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV 1) 50-75 and >75, and number of pulmonary exacerbations in the past year (1 or >1). Primary endpoints were the change from baseline in ppFEV 1 and safety. Secondary endpoints included the rate of pulmonary exacerbations. Overall, 199 subjects were randomized and dosed (acebilustat 50 mg, n=67; acebilustat 100 mg, n=66; placebo, n=66). Baseline demographics and disease profile were well balanced among treatment groups. Acebilustat had no statistically significant effect on the primary endpoint of change in ppFEV 1 at week 48 or the secondary endpoint pulmonary exacerbations. There was a trend towards reduced pulmonary exacerbations in subjects receiving acebilustat in pre-specified populations with ppFEV 1 >75 (35% rate reduction) and those on concomitant CFTR modulator therapy (20% rate reduction). Acebilustat was well tolerated. Acebilustat did not improve lung function. A trend towards reduced pulmonary exacerbations in subjects with an earlier stage of lung disease suggests a potential effect in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is an important and emerging area of research in cystic fibrosis (CF). • This report summarizes CF community priorities related to SRH research topics and workshop discussions of an expert panel in this area. • Further research is needed on sex hormones and CF, optimizing SRH care provision, and fertility and assisted reproductive technology. To address sexual and reproductive health (SRH) concerns among people with cystic fibrosis(PwCF), the CF Foundation created the Sexual Health, Reproduction, and Gender Research (SHARING) Working Group. This report summarizes CF community SRH research priorities and workshop discussions/future study planning. Pre-workshop, we distributed a community prioritization survey on CF SRH research/care. During the workshop, we used results and reviewed existing research to establish research priorities and design studies to address identified knowledge gaps. A total of 303 respondents (85 % PwCF, 15 % caregivers) completed the survey. Highly-rated SRH topics were: 1) effects of CF modulator therapy on sex hormones; 2) effects of sex hormones on CF; 3) fertility; 4) pregnancy; and 5) SRH/mental health. Twenty-four workshop participants established the need for further research on sex hormones and CF, optimizing SRH care provision, and fertility/ART. SRH is an important and emerging area in CF and thoughtful consideration of community perspectives can ensure that future research is relevant and responsive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Highly effective modulator treatment (HEMT) may be indicated in complex settings. • People with native CF lung disease are likely to benefit from initiation of HEMT. • Benefits and harms of HEMT after lung transplant are uncertain and should be studied. • In pregnancy, maternal risks and benefits weigh against uncertain risks to the fetus. • Cost of HEMT may limit access despite biologic plausibility of clinical benefit. The last decade has seen development of oral, small molecule therapies that address the basic cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein defect. Highly effective modulator treatment (HEMT) that is efficacious for a large majority of people living with cystic fibrosis (CF) promises to change the landscape of this chronic life-limiting disease. Some people living with CF have a CFTR genotype that renders them eligible for HEMT, but also have comorbidities that excluded them from the original Phase III clinical trials that led to US Food and Drug Administration approval. The purpose of this review is to address the use of HEMT in challenging situations, including initiation for those with advanced CF lung disease, and use after solid organ transplant, during pregnancy, and for individuals with CFTR-related disorders without a definitive diagnosis of CF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As their long-term prognosis improves, women with CF are increasingly choosing to have children, but the safety of CFTR modulators in pregnancy and breastfeeding is currently unknown. A survey was sent to lead clinicians of adult CF centres in Europe, the United Kingdom (UK), United States of America (USA), Australia and Israel requesting anonymised data on pregnancy outcomes in women using CFTR modulators before and during pregnancy and lactation. We identified 64 pregnancies in 61 women taking IVA (n = 31), LUM/IVA (n = 26) or TEZ/IVA (n = 7), resulting in 60 live births. In 44 pregnancies, CFTR modulators were either continued throughout pregnancy or temporarily stopped and then restarted. Two maternal complications were deemed related to CFTR modulator therapy; cessation of modulator therapy resulted in clinical decline in 9 women prompting resumption of therapy during pregnancy. No modulator-related complications were reported in infants exposed in utero and/or during breastfeeding. CFTR modulators were reported to be generally well tolerated in pregnancy and breastfeeding, with only 2 maternal complications that were deemed related to CFTR modulator therapy. Women stopping CFTR modulators in pregnancy may experience a decline in clinical status and in the cases identified in this survey, restarting therapy led to a clinical improvement. Current experience remains limited and longer-term prospective follow-up is required to exclude delayed adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Multidisciplinary cystic fibrosis (CF) clinicians believe the CF team has a primary role in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care of males with CF (MwCF). • Pediatric clinicians are significantly less likely to deem SRH topics important, conduct annual SRH discussions with MwCF, and report comfort in their SRH skills compared to adult colleagues. • CF clinicians endorse many key barriers and potential facilitators to optimizing SRH care for MwCF. Males with cystic fibrosis (MwCF) have unique sexual and reproductive health (SRH) concerns. This study investigates multidisciplinary CF clinician perspectives related to SRH for MwCF in the current era of CF care. We surveyed multidisciplinary clinicians exploring attitudes, practices, and preferences toward male CF SRH care. We compared responses across groups by population served (pediatric vs. adult vs. both pediatric and adult MwCF) using chi square/Fisher's exact tests. A total of 297 clinicians completed the survey (41 % pediatric, 36 % adult, 23 % both; 27 % physicians, 24 % social workers, 11 % nurses, 41 % other). Nearly all (98 %) believed the CF team had a role in SRH care with 75 % believing they should be primarily responsible. Pediatric clinicians were less likely to deem SRH topics important and less likely to report annual discussions compared to adult colleagues (all p <0.05). Pediatric clinicians reported less comfort in their SRH knowledge than adult colleagues (p <0.001) and in their ability to provide SRH care (p <0.05). Common barriers endorsed by respondents included lack of SRH knowledge (75 %) and presence of family/partners in exam room (64 %). A majority rated SRH screening tools (91 %), partnerships with SRH specialists (90 %), clinician training (83 %), and management algorithms (83 %) as potential facilitators. Multidisciplinary CF clinicians perceive SRH for MwCF as important but report suboptimal SRH discussions. Pediatric clinicians report significantly less comfort and skill in discussing and managing male SRH. Identified barriers and facilitators should be used to improve SRH care for MwCF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• HEMT improves multiple measures of sinusitis through 2 years of therapy in adults. • Sinus CT scans analyzed via machine learning methods and sinus symptoms improved. • Health utility increased and productivity loss decreased with 24 months of HEMT. • HEMT initiated in adulthood did not fully resolve chronic rhinosinusitis in adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Approximately 1/10 of orphan designations reached the marketing approval. • CFTR-based designations increased over time, while those symptomatic-based decreased. • Determinants of successful drug development for designations targeting CFTR. • Positive outcomes from large enterprises with experience in orphan drugs. In the United States (US) and in Europe, cystic fibrosis (CF) qualifies as a rare disease , thus positioning the field to benefit from regulatory incentives provided by orphan drug designation (ODD) to boost pharmaceutical research and development. In this study, we analyzed the pool of products for the treatment of CF that received such incentives from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Medicines Agency (EMA) over the past two decades. We describe the characteristics and trends in ODDs over time and explore factors that might be determinants of successful drug development. We collected the products that received the ODD from the registries of the FDA and the EMA from 2000 to 2021, characterizing their nature, development stage, and type of sponsor. We categorized the study drugs according to the therapeutic target addressed and described trends of drug development over the study period. A logistic regression analysis was done to assess how ODD characteristics were associated with the approval for market authorization. From 2000–2021, 107 ODDs were collectively granted by the FDA and the EMA for products developed for the treatment of CF. Although the trends of the number of ODDs granted remained stable over time, those targeting the CF basic protein defect increased from 6 out of 54 (11.1%) in the first half of the study period up to 20 out of 54 (37.7%) in the second half, while those treating symptoms decreased from 48/54 (88.9%) to 33/53 (62.3%). Overall, 10 products obtained marketing approval: 7 in both the US and Europe, 3 only in Europe. All the approved ODDs were chemical products for chronic use. No statistically significant difference was found across the examinated variables, but we observed possible drivers of successful drug development for ODDs targeting CFTR, as well as for those with active substances previously marketed, and for those developed by large companies and companies with experience in developing orphan drugs. By contrast, our findings suggest that financial issues most hamper the development of ODDs sponsored by small-medium enterprises. Although ODDs for treating infection and other CF sequelae accounted for the majority, we observed a shift of ODDs toward mechanism-based products over the study period. In line with other rare diseases, we found that approximately 1/10 ODDs for CF reached the status of marketing approval. Advances in disease genetics paved the way for a shift in CF drug development; however, we described how the convergence of pharmaceutical technology, the financial environment, and the regulatory ecosystem played a crucial role in successful marketing authorization in CF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Women with cystic fibrosis (wwCF) age ≥25 years have significantly different sexual and reproductive health (SRH) experiences than non-CF peers. • Most wwCF view their CF doctor as their main physician and almost half report no primary care provider (PCP). • WwCF report suboptimal SRH care compared to their preferences. • There is an urgent need to improve access to and delivery of SRH care for wwCF of all ages. • Innovative partnerships and initiatives may benefit SRH care and improve outcomes for wwCF. As survival and health improve in people with cystic fibrosis (CF), more women with CF (wwCF) are considering their sexual and reproductive health (SRH). This study compared SRH experiences, behaviors, and care utilization of wwCF to the general population and defined CF-impacted considerations and care preferences. We surveyed wwCF aged ≥25 years regarding SRH and compared results to the US National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG; n = 4357) and friend controls(n = 123). We used descriptive statistics and chi-squared/Fisher's exact testing and linear regression for comparisons. A total of 460 wwCF (mean age 36.1 years) completed the survey. WwCF were less likely to report current contraceptive use (43%vs76% NSFG, p <0.001;60% friends, p = 0.005). Nearly 25% of wwCF reported worsened CF symptoms during their menstrual cycles, 50% experienced urinary incontinence, and 80% vulvovaginal candidiasis. WwCF were significantly less likely to be parents (46%vs62% friends, p = 0.015) and to have experienced pregnancy (37%vs78% NSFG, p <0.001;58% friends, p = 0.002). More wwCF required medical assistance to conceive (29%vs12% NSFG, p <0.001 and 5% friends, p <0.001). Eighty-four percent of wwCF view their CF doctor as their main physician and 41% report no primary care provider (vs19% friends; p <0.001). WwCF report suboptimal rates of contraceptive and preconception counseling/care and are less likely to have received HPV vaccination (42%vs55%friends, p = 0.02). Despite desiring SRH conversations with their CF team, <50% report discussing SRH topics. WwCF have significantly different SRH experiences than non-CF peers. They report suboptimal SRH care compared to their preferences highlighting an urgent need to encourage SRH counseling/care in the CF model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• People with CF are living longer, healthier lives; more are considering parenthood. • There is a major knowledge gap regarding the health impacts of parenthood in CF. • We used UK CF registry data to evaluate parenthood's impact on health outcomes. • In the year after the birth of a child, parents' lung function and BMI decreased. • Prospective studies of parenthood in CF in the modern therapeutic era are needed. People with cystic fibrosis (CF) are living longer, healthier lives. A growing number are considering parenthood. There is a substantial knowledge gap regarding the health impacts of parenthood on people with CF. Using data from the United Kingdom CF registry from 2015 to 2019, we evaluated the impact of having a child on percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1), body mass index (BMI), and pulmonary exacerbations via multivariable longitudinal data analysis adjusting for age and sex in the year before a person with CF became a parent to the first year following parenthood. We examined whether changes from pre- to post-parenthood differed by sex or CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator use. Among 296 people with CF who became parents, we found a significant decrease in ppFEV1, (adjusted mean difference -3.19, CI: -4.31, -2.07; p <0.01) and BMI (adjusted mean difference -0.28, CI: -0.51, -0.05; p <0.02) and a significant increase in pulmonary exacerbations (adjusted rate ratio 1.3, CI: 1.13, 1.49; p <0.01) in the year following the birth of a child compared to the year prior. Further analysis showed that CFTR modulator use mitigated parenthood impacts on ppFEV1, but not on BMI and pulmonary exacerbations. Females experienced significantly worse impacts on BMI from pre- to post-parenthood compared to males. Parenthood adversely impacts short-term health outcomes for people with CF and CFTR modulator use mitigates such effects. To better understand the impact of the widespread use of highly effective CFTR modulators, longer-term, prospective parenthood studies are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• More women with CF desire to have a child and there is an increasing number of annual pregnancies in women with CF. • Pre-pregnancy health can impact maternal and fetal outcomes. Optimizing lung function, body mass index and glucose control are critical. • Highly effective CFTR modulator therapy is improving health in people with CF and potentially increasing fertility. • Discussions surrounding the risks and benefits of continuing medications is critical in women with CF considering pregnancy. • Outcomes in women with CF who experience pregnancy are overall good. Prospective multi-center studies are needed for more granular data. Cystic fibrosis (CF) was historically a disease largely afflicting children. Due to therapeutic advancements, there are now more adults with CF than children. In the past decade, medications including Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) modulators became available that treat the underlying cause of CF and are dramatically improving lung function as well as quality and quantity of life for people with CF. As a result, more women with CF are becoming pregnant. We gathered a panel of experts in CF care, family planning, high risk obstetrics, nutrition, genetics and women with CF to review current literature on pregnancies and to provide care recommendations for this unique population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• People with cystic fibrosis and sinus disease have impaired olfactory function. • These individuals have inflammation of the olfactory cleft on computed tomography. • Olfactory quality of life deficits were not prominently reported by people with CF. • Six months of CFTR modulator therapy did not lead to improvements in olfaction. • Future study will evaluate olfactory changes with greater duration of CFTR therapy. Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) improves pulmonary health and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF), however its impact on olfaction has not been investigated. Olfactory dysfunction impairs quality-of-life (QOL). This study evaluated the impact of ETI on multiple olfactory metrics. Adult PwCF/CRS with CF transmembrane conductance regulator genotype F508del/F508del or F508del/minimal function who clinically initiated ETI participated in a prospective, observational study. Endpoints included changes after 6 months of ETI in quantitative olfactory function (Smell Identification Test, SIT), olfactory QOL (Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders, QOD) and percent olfactory cleft opacification (%OCO), representing superior nasal cavity inflammation where afferent olfactory neurons are concentrated. 30 PwCF/CRS met inclusion criteria; 25 completed the study. Mean ETI adherence was 93%. At baseline, participants were hyposmic (mean SIT 31.3), had significant %OCO (mean 65.6%), yet reported non-impaired olfactory QOL (mean QOD 6.1). At follow-up, mean SIT worsened mildly (p=0.009), mean %OCO remained stable (p=0.46), and mean QOD improved modestly (p=0.008). No outcomes were impacted by prior modulator use, genotype, nasal polyps, or CF-related diabetes. Prior sinus surgery was associated with QOD improvement (p=0.04). Increased (worse) baseline QOD scores and %OCO were associated with greater improvements (p<0.003), but not SIT (p=0.44). ETI was not associated with improvement in quantitative olfaction or olfactory cleft opacification after 6 months. PwCF/CRS have hyposmia but do not report impairment in olfactory QOL. Further study to investigate mechanisms explaining olfactory dysfunction and whether olfaction improves with greater duration of ETI or in younger age groups is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To examine contraceptive use, pregnancy intention and the association of hormonal contraceptive type with adverse health outcomes among women with cystic fibrosis (CF).Study Design: We recruited 150 women with CF, ages 18-49 from three adult CF programs to complete an online survey regarding their pregnancy and contraceptive use history. Survey findings were merged with retrospective clinical information from the CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR). We used descriptive analyses to report contraceptive method and pregnancy frequencies, and logistic regression to examine the association between contraceptive method type and adverse health outcomes.Results: Combined hormonal contraceptives were the most commonly used methods (42%), followed by condoms (34%), and long-acting reversible contraceptives methods (27%). Thirty-three percent (n = 50) reported ever being pregnant, half of whom reported having at least one unplanned pregnancy. We found no significant association for mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection among progestin-only (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 0.07-32.2) and estrogen-containing hormonal contraceptive users (aOR 3.9, 95 % CI 0.20-76.5). Risk of osteoporosis was elevated among women with CF who used depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate compared to non-users (OR 5.36, 95% CI 1.00-29.12).Conclusions: Both contraceptive use and unplanned pregnancy among women with CF are common. Associations between hormonal contraceptive use and adverse pulmonary or bone outcomes among women with CF are inconclusive due to the study s small sample size. Larger studies are warranted.Implications: Women with CF should be informed about the risks and benefits of contraceptives in the context of their disease. CFFPR data capturing contraceptive method use may be the most efficient way to elucidate the association of hormonal contraceptives on disease in women with CF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and olfactory dysfunction (OD) are prevalent disease complications in people with cystic fibrosis. These understudied comorbidities significantly impact quality of life. The impact of highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) in young children with cystic fibrosis (YCwCF) on these disease complications is unknown. This proposed study aims to characterise CRS and OD in YCwCF and assess the efficacy of HEMT in improving sinus and olfactory health in this young age group., Methods: This six-centre, prospective, observational study will enrol 80 YCwCF aged 2-8 years. Patients are divided into two groups: those receiving HEMT and those not on HEMT based on clinical indication. Both groups undergo sinus magnetic resonance imaging, psychophysical olfactory tests, and complete patient- or parent-reported quality of life surveys over 2 years. Outcomes will be compared before and after initiation of HEMT and between groups. Ethical approval has been obtained for all sites, and this study has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06191640)., Results: Enrolment began in April 2023. 21 participants have been enrolled as of October 2023 with ongoing enrolment at all sites., Conclusion: This investigation is expected to provide critical insights into the potential benefits of early HEMT initiation in managing CRS and OD in YCwCF. It will assist in developing targeted interventions and contribute to the understanding of HEMT's role in altering the disease course in this demographic., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C.M. Liu reports an NIDCD grant related to this work. Conflict of interest: J.L. Fischer has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.T. Zermaick reports that in the last 36 months, she has received grants to her institution from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, National Institutes of Health and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; has received fees from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated related to consultation, participation on advisory boards, and grant review committees; she served as chair of the CFF Therapeutics Development Network steering committee, reviewed grants for CF Canada, and received travel support from the European CF Society Clinical Trials Network for speaking at their annual meeting. Conflict of interest: J.C. Woods reports that in the last 36 months, he has received grants to his institution from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated; and has received fees from Polarean LLC related to consultation on clinical and translational research. Conflict of interest: K.K. Markarian has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.B. Fain reports that in the last 36 months, he has served as a scientific advisor for Polarean LLC, and received research funding from Polarean LLC, Siemens Healthineers INC, and GE Healthcare INC for development of pulmonary CT and MRI methods. Conflict of interest: D. Froh reports that in the lasts 36 months, she has received grant support from the CF Foundation unrelated to this work, and from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Conflict of interest: S.L. Heltsche reports that in the last 36 months, they have received grant support from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; unrelated to this work they have has received grant support from National Institutes of Health and Boehringer Ingelheim, as well as service contracts from Calyx paid to their institution. Conflict of interest: L.R. Hoffman reports that in the past 36 months, they received grant funding from the CF Foundation and the NIH. Conflict of interest: S.M. Humphries declares grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and contracts from Calyx/Perceptive paid to their institution and unrelated to this work. E.L. Kramer reports that in the last 36 months, she has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Conflict of interest: K.L. Ode reports that in the last 36 months, she has received grant support from the National Institutes of Health, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. unrelated to this work Conflict of interest: M. Lewis participated in an advisory board serving as a consult for Pfizer to discuss RSV vaccines on 20 September 2023. Conflict of interest: D.A. Li reports that in the last 36 months, he has received grant support from the CF Foundation unrelated to this work. Conflict of interest: J. Mata reports that in the last 36 months, he has received grants to his institution from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Focused Ultrasound Foundation, iThriv and Polarean LLC; and fees from Polarean LLC related to consultation on clinical and translational research. Conflict of interest: S.S. Milla has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.J. Niedbalski reports that in the last 36 months, he has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, American Heart Association and Scleroderma Foundation. Conflict of interest: B.D. Sawatzky has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M-S. Sim has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.S. Sullivan reports that in the last 36 months, she has received honoraria from the American Academy of Pediatrics to serve on the PREP-SA editorial board, unrelated to this work Conflict of interest: A.T. Trout reports that in the last 36 months, he has received grant to his institution from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, National Institutes of Health, GE Healthcare, Siemens Healthineers and Perspectum Inc.; and is a consultant for GE Healthcare and serves as an Assistant Editor for Pediatric Radiology. Conflict of interest: C.H. Gross reports that in the last 36 months, he has received grants from the National Institutes of Health, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, the Federal Drug Administration; has received fees from Enterprise Therapeutics for providing clinical trial design advice, honoraria from Gilead Sciences to serve as grant review committee chair and from Vertex Pharmaceuticals for speaking at the UK LEAD conference, served as a DSMB Chair for a trial supported by Novartis and the European Commission, and serves as the Deputy Editor of the Annals of the American Thoracic Society; he has stock in Air Therapeutics. Conflict of interest: J.L. Taylor-Cousar reports that faculty in an institution that is part of the CF TDN, she has been a site principal investigator on studies for Vertex, 4DMT, and Eloxx; has consulted/provided clinical trial design advice for Vertex and 4DMT; served as Chair of a Data Monitoring Committee for AbbVie (complete); and has received grant funding from the CFF and NIH; and is a member of the CFF Clinical Research Executive Committee, CFF TDN Sexual Health, Reproduction, and Gender Research Working Group (SHARING), and CFF Racial Justice Working Group, is ATS International Conference Committee Chair-Elect and Respiratory Health Awards Committee Member (Scientific Grant Review and Clinical Problems Programming Committee-complete), and is a member of the Emily's Entourage Scientific Advisory Board, and National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Blood, Lung Institute Clinical Trials Review Study Section. Conflict of interest: D.M. Beswick reports that in the last 36 months, he has received grant support from CF Foundation and American Rhinologic Society; and unrelated to this work, has received grant support from the International Society of Inflammation and Allergy of the Nose and the American Rhinologic Society; honoraria and consulting fees from Amgen and, on medicolegal cases, at Garner Health (equity)., (Copyright ©The authors 2025.)

Background: Highly effective CFTR modulators improve CFTR function and lead to dramatic improvements in health outcomes in many people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). The relationship between measures of CFTR function, such as sweat chloride concentration, and clinical outcomes in pwCF treated with CFTR modulators is poorly defined. We conducted analyses to better understand the relationships between sweat chloride and CFTR function in vitro, and between sweat chloride and clinical outcomes following CFTR modulator treatment., Methods: Mean sweat chloride values in healthy people, CF carriers, and pwCF treated with CFTR modulators at different doses were compared to chloride transport in corresponding human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells. A pooled analysis of phase 3 CFTR modulator studies was performed to evaluate the relationship between attained values of sweat chloride and improvements in lung function, body mass index (BMI), patient reported outcomes, pulmonary exacerbations, and lung function change over time., Results: Sweat chloride concentrations in vivo correlated strongly with CFTR-dependent chloride current in HBE cells in vitro. Sweat chloride values of <30 mmol/L and ≥30 to <60 mmol/L in pwCF following CFTR modulator treatment were associated with better clinical outcomes than sweat chloride ≥60 to <80 mmol/L and ≥80 mmol/L., Conclusions: In pwCF treated with CFTR modulators, lower sweat chloride levels (reflecting greater CFTR function) are associated with better clinical outcomes. These results support the therapeutic strategy of further restoring CFTR function towards normal, as reflected in lowering sweat chloride to below the diagnostic threshold for CF (<60 mmol/L) and to normal (<30 mmol/L), with CFTR modulators., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest EZ reports grants and personal consulting fees from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Vertex). BM reports grants from Vertex, Cystic Medicines, and Sionna Therapeutics, and serves on an advisory board for Vertex. DS reports honoraria from Vertex for an educational event and she is president of the Polish Cystic Fibrosis Society. EM reports grants and lecture honoraria from Vertex, and advisory board participation with Vertex, Janssen, Insmed, and CF Storm. IF reports grants from AbbVie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed, GSK, Vertex, and Zambon, consulting fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kither Biotech, and Vertex, and a leadership role with the European Cystic Fibrosis Society. JT-C reports institutional grants for research trial conduct from Vertex, Eloxx and 4DMT; personal consulting fees from Vertex, Insmed, and 4DMT; personal speaker fees from Vertex; personal fees for chairing DMC for AbbVie; leadership or committee roles in CFF, ATS, JCF, Emily's Entourage, and NIH. MM reports personal consulting fees from Abbvie, Antabio, Arrowhead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Prieris, Recode, Santhera, Splisense, and Vertex, honoraria for lectures from Vertex, and participation in advisory boards from Abbvie, Antabio, Arrowhead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, and Pari. MK reports personal consulting fees from AbbVie, AzurRx, Cystetic Medicines, EnBiotix, First Wave Biopharma, Insmed, Laurent Pharmaceuticals, Mylan, and PBM BC Holdings; board participation for AbbVie, CFF, First Wave Biopharma, Insmed, Laurent Pharmaceuticals, Sionna, and Vertex; and committee membership for the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. NN, JZ, EA-S, FVG, LM, VP-C, PS, CB, and DW are employees of Vertex and own stock or stock options in the company. NM-HD reports consulting fees from Enterprise Therapeutics and received honoraria for NIH data safety monitoring board participation., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The goal of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators is to reach normal CFTR function in people with cystic fibrosis. Vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor restored CFTR function in vitro and in phase 2 trials in participants aged 18 years and older resulting in improvements in CFTR function, as measured by sweat chloride concentrations and lung function as measured by spirometry. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor compared with standard of care elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in individuals with cystic fibrosis aged 12 years and older., Methods: In two randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trials, individuals aged 12 years and older with stable cystic fibrosis with F508del-minimal function (SKYLINE Trial VX20-121-102) or with F508del-F508del, F508del-residual function, F508del-gating, or elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor-responsive-non-F508del genotypes (SKYLINE Trial VX20-121-103) were enrolled at 126 and 159 international sites, respectively. Eligible individuals were entered into a 4-week run-in period, during which they received elexacaftor (200 mg once daily), tezacaftor (100 mg once daily), and ivacaftor (150 mg once every 12 h) as two fixed-dose combination tablets in the morning and one ivacaftor tablet in the evening. They were then randomly assigned (1:1) to either elexacaftor (200 mg once daily), tezacaftor (100 mg once daily), and ivacaftor (150 mg once every 12 h) as two fixed-dose combination tablets in the morning and one ivacaftor tablet in the evening, or vanzacaftor (20 mg once daily), tezacaftor (100 mg once daily), and deutivacaftor (250 mg once daily) as two fixed-dose combination tablets in the morning, for the 52-week treatment period. All participants received matching placebo tablets to maintain the treatment blinding. Randomisation was done using an interactive web-response system and stratified by age, FEV 1 % predicted, sweat chloride concentration, and previous CFTR modulator use, and also by genotype for Trial VX20-121-103. The primary endpoint for both trials was absolute change in FEV 1 % predicted from baseline (most recent value before treatment on day 1) through week 24 (with non-inferiority of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor shown if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the primary endpoint was -3·0 or higher). Efficacy was assessed in all participants with the intended CFTR genotype who were randomly assigned to treatment and received at least one dose of study treatment during the treatment period. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study drug during the treatment period. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05033080 (Trial VX20-121-102) and NCT05076149 (Trial VX20-121-103), and are now complete., Findings: In Trial VX20-121-102 between Sept 14, 2021, and Oct 18, 2022, 488 individuals were screened, of whom 435 entered the 4-week run-in period, and subsequently 398 were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (n=202) or vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=196). Median age was 31·0 years (IQR 22·6-38·5), 163 (41%) of 398 participants were female, 235 (59%) were male, and 388 (97%) were White. In Trial VX20-121-103, between Oct 27, 2021, and Oct 26, 2022, 699 individuals were screened, of whom 597 entered the 4-week run-in period, and subsequently 573 participants were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (n=289) or vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=284). Median age was 33·1 years (IQR 24·5-42·2), 280 (49%) of 573 participants were female, 293 (51%) were male, and 532 (93%) were White. The absolute change in least squares mean FEV 1 % predicted from baseline through week 24 for Trial VX20-121-102 was 0·5 (SE 0·3) percentage points in the vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor group versus 0·3 (0·3) percentage points in the elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor group (least squares mean treatment difference of 0·2 percentage points [95% CI -0·7 to 1·1]; p<0·0001), and for Trial VX20-121-103, was 0·2 (SE 0·3) percentage points in the vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor group versus 0·0 (0·2) percentage points in the elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor group (least squares mean treatment difference 0·2 percentage points [95% CI -0·5 to 0·9]; p<0·0001). Most adverse events were mild or moderate, with the most common being infective pulmonary exacerbation (133 [28%] of 480 participants in the pooled vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor group vs 158 [32%] of 491 in the pooled elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor group), cough (108 [23%] vs 101 [21%]), COVID-19 (107 [22%] vs 127 [26%]), and nasopharyngitis (102 [21%] vs 95 [19%])., Interpretation: Vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor is non-inferior to elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor in terms of FEV 1 % predicted, and is safe and well tolerated. Once daily dosing with vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor reduces treatment burden, potentially improving adherence, compared with the twice daily regimen of the current standard of care. The restoration of CFTR function and the potential variants treated are also considerations that should be compared with currently available CFTR modulators., Funding: Vertex Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests TF, PM, PRS, NN, RZ, HM, NA, and AL are employees of Vertex Pharmaceuticals and own stock or stock options in that company. FV reports grants from HIT-CF Project, Research Foundation Flanders Strategic Basic Research, University KU Leuven Internal Funds, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and King Baudouin Foundation; a service agreement with Ziphius vaccines; a consulting agreement with Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and financial support from Viatris and Mylan. DP reports grants, consulting fees, and speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. RWL reports grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and consulting fees and travel support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. AT reports support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, travel support from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and is a board member of the local Cystic Fibrosis Foundation chapter. TK reports speaker fees and travel support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. JM reports grants from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clarametyx Biosciences, and Spirovant Pharmaceuticals. ATB reports grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. MO reports speaker fees and travel support from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, and speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. SS reports grants, consulting fees, and speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Insmed; and grants and speaker fees from AstraZeneca. BR reports grants from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Cystetic Medicines, and Sionna Therapeutics; and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for the NIH. MAM reports grants from the German Research Foundation, German Ministry for Education and Research, German Innovation Fund, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Prieris, Recode, Splisense, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Pari, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and is a Fellow of the European Respiratory Society. JLT-C reports grants and consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and 4D Molecular Therapeutics; a grant from Eloxx; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie; and serving as the adult patient care representative for the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Board of Trustees, on the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Clinical Research Executive Committee, as immediate past Chair of the Cystic Fibrosis TDN's Sexual Health, Reproduction and Gender Research Working Group, as Co-chair of the Health Equity Team Science Awards study section and on the Racial Justice Working Group, on the scientific advisory board for Emily's Entourage, on the American Thoracic Society Respiratory Health Awards and Scientific Grant Review Committees, as Chair-elect of the International Conference Committee, as Associate Editor for the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, as a member of the International Advisory Board for The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, and on the Clinical Trials Review study section for the NIH. EFM reports grants and speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, travel support from Menarini, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Cystic Fibrosis Storm Clinical Trial, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, AbbVie, Insmed, and Enterprise Therapeutics. ET reports grants from St Michael's Hospital and consulting fees, speaker fees, and travel support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. AH reports grants from Cystic Fibrosis Trust, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; consulting and speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and serves as the Chair of the Cystic Fibrosis Trust Clinical Trials Accelerator Platform and Chair of the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Respiratory Translational Research Collaboration. LMY and CK declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: In phase 2 trials in people with cystic fibrosis aged 18 years and older, vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor has been shown to be a safe and effective, once-daily cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator. Restoring normal CFTR function early in life has the potential to prevent manifestations of cystic fibrosis. We aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in children with cystic fibrosis aged 6-11 years., Methods: In this multicentre, single-arm, phase 3 trial (RIDGELINE Trial VX21-121-105), participants were enrolled across 33 clinical sites that care for children with cystic fibrosis in eight countries (Australia, France, Germany, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA). Eligible participants were aged 6-11 years with at least one elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor-responsive CFTR variant, FEV 1 % predicted of 60% or higher, and stable cystic fibrosis as determined by investigators. Before study treatment, participants were either on stable elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor for at least 28 days before screening or received the combination for a 4-week run-in period. Participants then received vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (<40 kg bodyweight: vanzacaftor 12 mg, tezacaftor 60 mg, and deutivacaftor 150 mg orally as three fixed-dose combination tablets once daily; ≥40 kg bodyweight: vanzacaftor 20 mg, tezacaftor 100 mg, and deutivacaftor 250 mg orally as two fixed-dose combination tablets once daily (manufactured by Patheon Pharmaceuticals, Cincinnati, OH, USA) from day 1 for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, as measured by adverse events, vital signs, clinical laboratory values, electrocardiograms, and pulse oximetry. Endpoints were analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05422222, and evaluation of the 6-11-year-old cohort is complete., Findings: Between Feb 6 and May 18, 2023, 83 children were screened, of whom five were not eligible, and 78 children aged 6-11 years received at least one dose of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor. Median age was 9·3 years (IQR 7·6-10·4), 34 (44%) of 78 participants were female, 44 (56%) were male, 71 (91%) were White, one (1%) was Black or African American, and one (1%) was of multiple races. The analysis for these data was completed on Dec 15, 2023. Median exposure of participants to vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor was 168 days (IQR 166-170). 75 (96%) of 78 participants had adverse events, all of which were mild or moderate; the most common events were generally consistent with cystic fibrosis manifestations, including, cough (36 [46%]), pyrexia (16 [21%]), headache (14 [18%]), infective pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis (13 [17%]), and oropharyngeal pain (13 [17%]). Serious adverse events occurred in six (8%) participants (two had infective pulmonary exacerbation, one of whom also had failure to thrive; one participant each had adenovirus infection, constipation, pulmonary function test decreased, and cough), and one (1%) participant discontinued due to adverse events of cough and fatigue that were considered possibly related to study drug., Interpretation: Vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor was safe and well tolerated and maintained FEV 1 % predicted from elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor baseline with further improved CFTR function. Improvements in CFTR function compared with baseline elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor values demonstrate the potential opportunity to restore normal physiology early and prevent development or progression of cystic fibrosis. Nearly all participants had sweat chloride below the diagnostic threshold for cytstic fibrosis (<60 mmol/L) and more than half had normal levels (<30 mmol/L). Additional long-term data in children with cystic fibrosis are being collected in an open-label extension study to demonstrate clinical benefits and safety. These findings will inform health-care providers and people with cystic fibrosis regarding the benefits of early initiation of CFTR modulators., Funding: Vertex Pharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DBS, JZ, Y-CC, VR-R, and PRS are employees of Vertex Pharmaceuticals and might own stock or have stock options in that company. JEH reports grants from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and support to travel or attend meetings from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, and Cystic Fibrosis Canada. ASK reports grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation and support to attend meetings from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. JEP reports grants to their institution from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics Development Center; honorarium for participation in Grant Review Committee from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Clinical Review Committee; and reduced registration fee from the North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference and American Thoracic Society Conference. RJ reports their institution was engaged as central over-readers for the multiple breath washout data collected in this Vertex trial. LPT reports advisory board participation and honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; funding to her institution to support educational materials for health-care professionals from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, and GSK; and participation on a Cystic Fibrosis Trust research oversight advisory board. BR reports grants from the NIH and the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Cystetic Medicines, and Sionna Therapeutics; and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for the NIH. MAM reports grants from the German Research Foundation, German Ministry for Education and Research, German Innovation Fund, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Prieris, Recode, Splisense, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Pari, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and is a fellow of the European Respiratory Society. JLT-C reports grants and consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and 4D Molecular Therapeutics; grant from Eloxx; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AbbVie; serving as the adult patient care representative for the Cystic Fibrosis Board of Trustees; serving on the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Clinical Research Executive Committee; serving as immediate past chair of the Cystic Fibrosis Therapeutic Development Network's Sexual Health, Reproduction and Gender Research Working Group; serving as co-chair of the Health Equity Team Science Awards study section and on the Racial Justice Working Group; serving on the scientific advisory board for Emily's Entourage; previously serving on the American Thoracic Society Respiratory Health Awards and Scientific Grant Review Committees; serving as Chair-elect of the International Conference Committee; serving as Associate Editor for the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis; serving as a member of the International Advisory Board for The Lancet Respiratory Medicine; and serving on the Clinical Trials Review study section for the NIH. EFM reports grants and speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; travel support from Menarini; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for CF STORM Clinical Trial, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, AbbVie, Insmed, and Enterprise Therapeutics. ET reports grants from St Michael's Hospital and consulting fees, speaker fees, and travel support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. GD reports institutional fees, meeting support, and advisory board participation from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and speaker honoraria for educational events from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Chiesi. PR and PT declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: KO-D is an employee at the Cystic Fibrosis Therapeutics Development Network (CF TDN) Coordinating Center at Seattle Children's Research Institute, with salary indirectly supported through the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF). JLT-C reports, as a faculty at an institution that is part of the CF TDN, site or national principal investigator roles on studies for 4DMT, Vertex, and Eloxx; grant funding from the CFF and NIH; payments to the institution for clinical trial advisory efforts from Vertex and 4DMT; travel support to participate in CFF Board of Trustees meetings from the CFF; past payments as Chair of an AbbVie data monitoring committee; role as adult patient care representative to the CFF Board of Trustees; serving on the CFF's Clinical Research Executive Committee, CFF advisory board, Racial Justice Working Group, scientific advisory board for Emily's Entourage, ATS Scientific Grant Review Committee, the Respiratory Research Awards Committee, and the NHLBI Clinical Trials Study Section; oles as immediate past Chair of the CF TDN's Sexual Health, Reproduction and Gender Research-Working Group, and Co-Chair of the Heath Equity Team Science Awards study section; role as current Chair-Elect for the ATS International Conference Committee; and membership of the International Advisory Board of The Lancet Respiratory Medicine and the Editorial Board of the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis.

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to summarize available data on fertility, fertility preservation, pregnancy and parenthood following lung transplantation for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF)., Recent Findings: In the era of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator use, oral therapies that positively impact fundamental CFTR protein abnormalities, the number of pregnancies has increased dramatically with a concomitant decrease in lung transplantation. Nonetheless, some pwCF still require lung transplantation as a life-saving measure, and a fraction of those individuals desires parenthood. Cystic fibrosis (CF) providers infrequently discuss fertility preservation with pwCF, and pwCF feel uneducated about their fertility options posttransplant. However, because the immunosuppression required to successfully maintain lung allografts may impact future fertility, pwCF should receive genetic and reproductive counseling prior to lung transplantation. While pregnancies posttransplantation are high-risk, selected females with CF may be able to pursue this path to parenthood., Summary: Although there is a paucity of data specific to pwCF who have undergone lung transplantation, recently developed general guidelines should inform discussions regarding fertility, pregnancy and parenthood in pwCF who desire parenthood following lung transplantation for optimal shared decision-making., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Sociodemographic status (SDS) including race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status as approximated by education, income, and insurance status impact pulmonary disease in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). The relationship between SDS and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains understudied., Methods: In a prospective, multi-institutional study, adult PwCF completed the 22-Question SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Smell Identification Test (SIT), Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorder Negative Statements (QOD-NS), and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R). Lund-Kennedy scores, sinus computed tomography, and clinical data were collected. Data were analyzed across race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic factors using multivariate regression., Results: Seventy-three PwCF participated with a mean age of 34.7 ± 10.9 years and 49 (67.1%) were female. Linear regression identified that elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) use (β = ‒4.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] [‒6.08, ‒2.11], p < 0.001), female sex (β = ‒2.14, 95% CI [‒4.11, ‒0.17], p = 0.034), and increasing age (β = ‒0.14, 95% CI [‒0.22, ‒0.05], p = 0.003) were associated with lower/better endoscopy scores. Private health insurance (β = 17.76, 95% CI [5.20, 30.32], p = 0.006) and >16 educational years (β = 13.50, 95% CI [2.21, 24.80], p = 0.020) were associated with higher baseline percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV 1 ). Medicaid/Medicare insurance was associated with worse endoscopy scores, CFQ-R respiratory scores, and ppFEV 1 (all p < 0.017), and Hispanic/Latino ethnicity was associated with worse SNOT-22 scores (p = 0.047), prior to adjustment for other cofactors. No other SDS factors were associated with SNOT-22, QOD-NS, or SIT scores., Conclusions: Differences in objective measures of CRS severity exist among PwCF related to sex, age, and ETI use. Variant status and race did not influence patient-reported CRS severity measures or olfaction in this study. Understanding how these factors impact response to treatment may improve care disparities among PwCF., Clinical Trials: NCT04469439., (© 2024 The Authors. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy and American Rhinologic Society.)

Competing Interests: PGM reports having been Chief Investigator in the Trikafta trial published in the New England Journal of Medicine 2019; receiving honoraria for lectures and presentations from Vertex, AstraZeneca, Limbic, and MedEd; and being a member of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) Data Safety Monitoring Board, the European Cystic Fibrosis Society Standards of Care Committee, the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Standards of Care Committee, the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Data Registry, and the Australian Bronchiectasis Registry. JLT-C reports having been site or national principal investigator on studies for 4DMT, Vertex, and Eloxx, as faculty at an institution that is part of the CFF Therapeutics Development Network; grant funding from CFF and the National Institutes of Health; payments to institution for clinical trial advising efforts from Vertex and 4DMT; travel support for participation in Board of Trustees meetings from CFF; payments for role as Chair of a data monitoring committee from AbbVie; serving as the adult patient care representative to the CFF Board of Trustees, on the CFF Clinical Research Executive Committee, Clinical Research Advisory Board, Racial Justice Working Group, as immediate past chair of the CFF Therapeutics Development Network's Sexual Health, Reproduction and Gender Research Working Group, as Co-Chair of the Heath Equity Team Science Awards study section, on the scientific advisory board for Emily's Entourage, on the American Thoracic Society Scientific Grant Review Committee, on the Respiratory Research Awards Committee, as Chair-Elect for the ATS International Conference Committee, and on the NHLBI Clinical Trials Study Section; and being a member of the International Advisory Board for The Lancet Respiratory Medicine and the Editorial Board for the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis.

Background: In the United States, Black and Latino children with asthma are more likely than White children with asthma to require emergency department visits or hospitalizations because of an asthma exacerbation. Although many cite patient-level socioeconomic status and access to health care as primary drivers of disparities, there is an emerging focus on a major root cause of disparities-systemic racism. Current conceptual models of asthma disparities depict the historical and current effects of systemic racism as the foundation for unequal exposures to social determinants of health, environmental exposures, epigenetic factors, and differential healthcare access and quality. These ultimately lead to biologic changes over the life course resulting in asthma morbidity and mortality. Methods: At the 2022 American Thoracic Society International Conference, a diverse panel of experts was assembled to identify gaps and opportunities to address systemic racism in childhood asthma research. Panelists found that to examine and address the impacts of systemic racism on children with asthma, researchers and medical systems that support biomedical research will need to 1 ) address the current gaps in our understanding of how to conceptualize and characterize the impacts of systemic racism on child health, 2 ) design research studies that leverage diverse disciplines and engage the communities affected by systemic racism in identifying and designing studies to evaluate interventions that address the racialized system that contributes to disparities in asthma health outcomes, and 3 ) address funding mechanisms and institutional research practices that will be needed to promote antiracism practices in research and its dissemination. Results: A thorough literature review and expert opinion discussion demonstrated that there are few studies in childhood asthma that identify systemic racism as a root cause of many of the disparities seen in children with asthma. Community engagement and participation in research studies is essential to design interventions to address the racialized system in which patients and families live. Dissemination and implementation studies with an equity lens will provide the multilevel evaluations required to understand the impacts of interventions to address systemic racism and the downstream impacts. To address the impacts of systemic racism and childhood asthma, there needs to be increased training for research teams, funding for studies addressing research that evaluates the impacts of racism, funding for diverse and multidisciplinary research teams including community members, and institutional and financial support of advocating for policy changes based on study findings. Conclusions: Innovative study design, new tools to identify the impacts of systemic racism, community engagement, and improved infrastructure and funding are all needed to support research that will address impacts of systemic racism on childhood asthma outcomes.

Orangutan respiratory disease syndrome (ORDS) is a disease unique to orangutans ( Pongo sp ), characterized by chronic bacterial infection and inflammation of any region or combination of regions of the respiratory tract, including the sinuses, air sacs, cranial bones, airways, and lung parenchyma. Aggressive early intervention during a first episode may prevent progression to chronic disease. However, in the setting of an established chronic disease, intermittent acute exacerbations are associated with worsening symptoms and increased infection and inflammation. ORDS is ultimately fatal due to loss of respiratory function resulting from chronic structural damage. Utilizing potentially lifelong medications to slow the progression of chronic, destructive inflammation in the respiratory tract, chronic treatment is aimed at stabilizing the animals' respiratory function, decreasing the frequency of recurrent exacerbations, and improving their general well-being. Three adult male Bornean orangutans ( Pongo pygmaeus ) housed at an orangutan rehabilitation and reintroduction center in Indonesia have long histories of recurrent respiratory disease. Each underwent CT scans confirming ORDS with chronic airway disease prior to initiation of a long-term treatment protocol. Based on data-driven medical management of bronchiectasis in humans, the three orangutans have been treated with long-term combination regimens of oral azithromycin, nebulized salbutamol, and nebulized hypertonic saline. Follow-up CT scans in all three animals at least 1 yr following treatment initiation showed improvements throughout their respiratory tracts. The duration of each exacerbation period decreased, and the orangutans have longer symptom-free periods compared to before the start of treatment. At an average of 5 yr into the long-term treatment protocol, all three orangutans are thriving. Chronic medical management of ORDS modeled after human treatment of bronchiectasis has been efficacious in these three orangutans and encourages further study of this approach.

Objectives: The 22-question SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) assesses chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) severity. We aimed to identify predictors of SNOT-22 score improvement following highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) initiation and to corroborate the SNOT-22 minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF)., Methods: Prospective observational data was pooled from four studies across 10 US centers investigating people with CF (PwCF) and CRS. Three studies evaluated HEMT's impact on CRS. For participants enrolled prior to HEMT initiation, SNOT-22 scores were obtained at baseline and after 3-6 months of HEMT. Multivariate regression identified predictors of improvement. Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were used to assess internal consistency and calculate the MCID of the SNOT-22., Results: A total of 184 PwCF participated with mean baseline SNOT-22 scores ranging from 18.1 to 56.7. Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.90 across sites. Participants at sites with pre- and post-HEMT data reported improvement in SNOT-22 scores after initiating HEMT (all p < 0.05). Worse baseline SNOT-22 score (odds ratio (OR): 1.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08), F508del homozygosity (OR: 4.30, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 1.14-18.99), and absence of prior modulator therapy (OR: 4.99, p = 0.017, 95% CI: 1.39-20.11) were associated with greater SNOT-22 improvement. The mean MCID calculated via distribution-based methods was 8.5., Conclusion: Worse baseline sinonasal symptoms, F508del homozygosity, and absence of prior modulator therapy predicted greater improvement after HEMT initiation. The mean MCID for SNOT-22 in PwCF is 8.5 points, similar to non-CF individuals with CRS, and provides a threshold specifically for PwCF. The SNOT-22 has strong internal consistency in PwCF., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3965-3973, 2024., (© 2024 The Authors. The Laryngoscope published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Cystic fibrosis is a rare genetic disease caused by mutations in CFTR, the gene encoding cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). The discovery of CFTR in 1989 has enabled the unravelling of disease mechanisms and, more recently, the development of CFTR-directed therapeutics that target the underlying molecular defect. The CFTR protein functions as an ion channel that is crucial for correct ion and fluid transport across epithelial cells lining the airways and other organs. Consequently, CFTR dysfunction causes a complex multi-organ disease but, to date, most of the morbidity and mortality in people with cystic fibrosis is due to muco-obstructive lung disease. Cystic fibrosis care has long been limited to treating symptoms using nutritional support, airway clearance techniques and antibiotics to suppress airway infection. The widespread implementation of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis and the introduction of a highly effective triple combination CFTR modulator therapy that has unprecedented clinical benefits in up to 90% of genetically eligible people with cystic fibrosis has fundamentally changed the therapeutic landscape and improved prognosis. However, people with cystic fibrosis who are not eligible based on their CFTR genotype or who live in countries where they do not have access to this breakthrough therapy remain with a high unmet medical need., (© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is common in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Rhinologic symptom prioritization and areas that influence CRS treatment choices, including pursuing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), remain understudied., Methods: Adult PwCF + CRS were enrolled at eight centers into a prospective, observational study (2019-2023). Participants were administered the 22-SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) survey and a modified SNOT-22 instrument examining symptom importance. We determined importance rankings for individual symptoms and SNOT-22 symptom importance subdomains in two sets of subgroups-those pursuing ESS versus continuing medical management (CMT), and those on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) versus not on ETI., Results: Among 69 participants, the highest priorities were nasal congestion (n = 48, 69.6% important), post-nasal discharge (32, 46.4%), facial pain (29, 43.3%), waking up tired (27, 39.1%), and fatigue (26, 37.7%). Those electing surgery (n = 23) prioritized sleep and psychological dysfunction symptoms compared to those pursuing CMT (n = 49) (sleep median score = 19.0 [interquartile range: 12.0, 25.0] vs. 4.5 [0.0, 12.8]; p < 0.0001; psychological = 17.0 [7.0, 26.0] vs. 7.0 [0.0, 15.8]; p = 0.002). ETI users had comparable SNOT-22 total symptom importance scores to non-ETI users (p = 0.14). Non-ETI users (n = 34) showed a trend toward prioritizing sleep symptoms compared to ETI users (n = 35) (13.0 [2.8, 22.3] vs. 6.0 [2.0, 17.0]; p = 0.055)., Conclusions: Nasal congestion and post-nasal discharge were top priorities reported by PwCF + CRS. Those electing surgery prioritized sleep and psychological symptoms, highlighting their importance in pre-operative discussions. Non-ETI users' prioritization of sleep improvement may highlight their unique disease impact and therapeutic needs; however, additional investigation is required., (© 2024 The Authors. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy and American Rhinologic Society.)

Introduction: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common among people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) is a validated instrument that evaluates olfactory-specific quality-of-life. The QOD minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and factors associated with olfactory improvement after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor have not been determined for PwCF., Methods: Prospective observational data were pooled from three studies that enrolled adult PwCF with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). QOD scores and disease characteristics were assessed. To evaluate internal consistency and calculate the QOD MCID, Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were employed. For participants who enrolled prior to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD scores were obtained at baseline and after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor initiation. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with QOD improvement., Results: Of 129 PwCF included, 65 had QOD scores before and 3-6 months after starting elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Mean baseline QOD score was 6.5 ± 7.9. Mean Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.85. The MCID estimates were as follows: Cohen's effect size = 1.6, standard error of measurement = 2.5, ½ baseline standard deviation = 4.0, and minimal detectable change = 6.9. Mean MCID was 3.7. Of those with pre/post elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor QOD scores, the mean change in QOD was -1.3 ± 5.4. After elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD improvement surpassed the MCID in 22% of participants (14/65). Worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps were associated with improved QOD scores after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (both p < 0.04)., Conclusion: The QOD MCID in PwCF was estimated to be 3.7. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor led to qualitative but not clinically meaningful improvements in QOD score for most PwCF; PwCF with worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps improved in a clinically significant manner., (© 2023 ARS‐AAOA, LLC.)

This is the final of four papers updating standards for the care of people with CF. That this paper "Planning a longer life" was considered necessary, highlights how much CF care has progressed over the past decade. Several factors underpin this progress, notably increased numbers of people with CF with access to CFTR modulator therapy. As the landscape for CF changes, so do the hopes and aspirations of people with CF and their families. This paper reflects the need to consider people with CF not as a "problem" to be solved, but as a success, a potential and a voice to be heard. People with CF and the wider CF community have driven this approach, reflecting many of the topics in this paper. This exercise involved wide stakeholder engagement. People with CF are keen to contribute to research priorities and be involved in all stages of research. People with CF want healthcare professionals to respect them as individuals and consider the impact of our actions on the world around us. Navigating life presents challenges to all, but for people with CF these challenges are heightened and complex. In this paper we highlight the concerns and life moments that impact people with CF, and events that the CF team should aim to support, including the challenges around having a family. People with CF and their care teams must embrace the updated standards outlined in these four papers to enjoy the full potential for a healthier life., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors had no declarations of interest in relation to the current work. Declarations of interest for each author outside the current work are summarised in Supplementary Table 4., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains unresolved for many people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). While highly effective modulator therapy improves quality-of-life and symptom severity, the impact of this intervention and other factors associated with pursuing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) remains understudied., Methods: Adult PwCF + CRS were enrolled into a prospective, observational, multi-institutional study. Participants completed validated outcome measures to evaluate respiratory symptom severity, depression, headache, and sleep quality, as well as nasal endoscopy, sinus computed tomography (CT), and olfactory testing. Bivariate comparisons and regression modeling evaluated treatment cofactors, disease characteristics, and outcome measures associated with pursuing ESS., Results: Sixty PwCF were analyzed, including 24 (40%) who elected ESS. Pursuing ESS was associated with worse SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) total, rhinologic, psychological, and sleep dysfunction domain scores; worse Patient Health Questionnaire-9-Revised depression scores; worse Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total scores; worse weight, role, emotion, and eating domain scores on the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised; more severe disease on nasal endoscopy; and lack of modulator therapy (all p < 0.050). Multivariable regression identified that worse SNOT-22 total score was associated with electing ESS (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.16, p = 0.015) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.004-0.34, p = 0.004) was associated with pursing medical therapy., Conclusions: Worse sinonasal symptom burden, lack of ETI treatment, sleep quality, depression, and nasal endoscopy scores were associated with electing ESS, while lung disease severity and sinus CT scores were not. ETI use was associated with lower odds of pursuing ESS independent of sinonasal symptom burden., (© 2023 ARS‐AAOA, LLC.)

Airway inflammation underlies cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations. In a prospective multicenter study of randomly selected, clinically stable adolescents and adults, we assessed relationships between 24 inflammation-associated molecules and the future occurrence of CF pulmonary exacerbation using proportional hazards models. We explored relationships for potential confounding or mediation by clinical factors and assessed sensitivities to treatments including CF transmembrane regulator (CFTR) protein synthesis modulators. Results from 114 participants, including seven on ivacaftor or lumacaftor-ivacaftor, representative of the US CF population during the study period, identified 10 biomarkers associated with future exacerbations mediated by percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s. The findings were not sensitive to anti-inflammatory, antibiotic, and CFTR modulator treatments. The analyses suggest that combination treatments addressing RAGE-axis inflammation, protease-mediated injury, and oxidative stress might prevent pulmonary exacerbations. Our work may apply to other airway inflammatory diseases such as bronchiectasis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome., Competing Interests: T.G.L., J.A.F., J.L.J., Y.L., K.A.P., and J.B.V. received other support from the CFF (CC132-16AD, LIOU14Y0, LIOU14P0) and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01 HL125520) and received support during the current study for performing clinical trials from Abbvie, Calithera Biosciences, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Laurent Pharmaceuticals, Nivalis Therapeutics, Novartis, Proteostasis, Savara Pharmaceuticals, Translate Bio, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. F.R.A. received additional other support from the NHLBI/NIH (R01 HL125520), the National Science Foundation (EMSW21-RTG), and the Margolis Family Foundation of Utah. P.S.B. received other support from the CFF (Center and TDC grants) and the NHLBI/NIH (U01 HL114623) and received support for a clinical trial from Alcresta Therapeutics. B.A.C. received other support from the CFF (C112–12, C112-TDC09Y, 10063SUB, 41339154.s132P010379SUB) and received support for clinical trials from Genentech, Novartis, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. C.L.D. received other support from the CFF (C004–11, C004-TDC09Y, DAINES11Y3) and from the Health Resources and Services Administration (T72MC00012). J.A.F. transitioned to become an employee of ICON plc, a clinical research organization involved in various trials pertinent to CF during the study and is now an employee of Vertex Pharmaceuticals; JAF, ICON, and Vertex had no direct involvement in performance of the study following the initial change in affiliation. T.H. received other support from the CFF (PACE, Center Grant) and received support for clinical trials from Celtaxsys and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. J.R.H. received other support from the NHLBI/NIH (HHSN268200900018C) and the Veterans Administration Healthcare System (I01 BX001533). J.L. received other support from the CFF (C017-11AF). C.N. received other support from the CFF (C138-12). P.R. received other support from the CFF (C003–12, C003-TDC09Y). S.D.S. received other support from the CFF (AQUADEK12K1, SAGEL11CS0, GOAL13K2, NICK13A0, SAGEL14K1, NICK15R0) and the NHLBI/NIH (U54 HL096458) and the NCATS/NIH (Colorado CTSA Grant Number UL1 TR002535). J.L.T.-C. received other support from the CFF (TDC) and the NHLBI/NIH (HL103801) and received support for clinical trials from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. K.N.O. was funded by the intramural research program of the NHLBI, NIH, during the study. Neither the project sponsors nor any sources of other support had direct roles in development and conduct of the study. None of the sponsors of clinical trials mentioned earlier participated in any way with this trial., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Background: In two pivotal phase 3 trials, up to 24 weeks of treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was efficacious and safe in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) ≥12 years of age who have at least one F508del allele. The aim of this study is to assess long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in these patients., Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, single-arm extension study, participants with F508del -minimal function (from a 24-week parent study; n=399) or F508del - F508del (from a 4-week parent study; n=107) genotypes receive ELX/TEZ/IVA at the same dose (ELX 200 mg once daily, TEZ 100 mg once daily and IVA 150 mg every 12 h). The primary end-point is safety and tolerability. A prespecified interim analysis was conducted when the last participant reached the Week 144 visit., Results: At the Week 144 interim analysis, mean duration of exposure to ELX/TEZ/IVA in the extension study was 151.1 weeks. Exposure-adjusted rates of adverse events (AEs) (586.6 events per 100 participant-years) and serious AEs (22.4 events per 100 participant-years) were lower than in the ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment group in the 24-week parent study (1096.0 and 36.9 events per 100 participant-years, respectively); most participants had AEs classified as mild (16.4% of participants) or moderate (60.3% of participants) in severity. 14 participants (2.8%) had AEs that led to treatment discontinuation. Following initiation of ELX/TEZ/IVA, participants had increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) percentage predicted, Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score and body mass index, and had decreases in sweat chloride concentration and pulmonary exacerbation rates that were maintained over the interim analysis period. The mean annualised rate of change in FEV 1 % pred was +0.07 (95% CI -0.12-0.26) percentage points among the participants., Conclusions: ELX/TEZ/IVA was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the 24-week parent study. Participants had sustained improvements in lung function, respiratory symptoms, CF transmembrane conductance regulator function, pulmonary exacerbation rates and nutritional status. These results support the favourable safety profile and durable, disease-modifying clinical benefits of ELX/TEZ/IVA., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: All authors received nonfinancial support (assistance with manuscript preparation) from Nucleus Global, which received funding from Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated. C.L. Daines has nothing further to disclose. E. Tullis has received consulting, speaker and travel fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. S. Costa serves on an advisory board for Vertex Pharmaceuticals. R.W. Linnemann serves on an advisory board and reports grants paid to her institution and consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. M.A. Mall reports patient recruitment fees paid to his institution and advisory fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees from Antabio, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Santhera, Sterna Biologicals and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, speaker fees from Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, travel fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, advisory fees from Antabio, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotech, Santhera and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and serves on the European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS) board. E.F. McKone reports grants, lecture fees and serving on an advisory board for Vertex Pharmaceuticals, lecture fees from Roche, travel fees from A. Menarini, and serving on advisory boards for Janssen, Insmed and CF Storm. D. Polineni reports grants from Laurent Pharmaceuticals, Parion Sciences, Proteostasis Therapeutics and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, nonfinancial support for travel to investigator meeting from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and serves on an advisory board for Sanofi. B.S. Quon reports payments paid to his institution and speaker fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. F.C. Ringshausen reports grants paid to his institution from Basilea Pharmaceutica, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Inhaled Antibiotics in Bronchiectasis and Cystic Fibrosis (iABC)/Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), Insmed, Novartis and Polyphor, consulting fees from Grifols, Insmed, Parion, Shionogi and Zambon, speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Grifols, Insmed and Novartis, participation on advisory boards for Grifols, Insmed, Parion, Shionogi and Zambon, unpaid honoraria as co-chair of the German Bronchiectasis Registry (PROGNOSIS), and payments to his institution from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, Celtaxsys, Insmed, Novartis, Parion, Polyphor, Vertex and Zambon; and is a steering committee member of the European Bronchiectasis Registry (EMBARC), a steering committee member of the European NTM registry (EMBARC-NTM), a core network lead in ERN-LUNG, a principal investigator for DZL, a chair of the cystic fibrosis working group of the German Respiratory Society (DGP), a steering committee member of the Group of German CF Physicians (AGAM), and co-chair of medical consultants of PCD Patient Advocacy Group (Kartagener Syndrom und Primäre Ciliäre Dyskinesie eV). S.M. Rowe reports grants paid to his institution from AbbVie, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Celtaxsys, Eloxx, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Synedgen, Synspira Therapeutics, Translate Bio and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, nonfinancial support from AbbVie, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Proteostasis Therapeutics, Renovion, Synedgen and Synspira Therapeutics, consulting fees from AbbVie, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Cystetic Medicines, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Renovion, Synedgen, Synspira Therapeutics and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and serves as co-chair for the Next Generation Steering Committee on Vertex Pharmaceuticals. H. Selvadurai has nothing further to disclose. J.L. Taylor-Cousar serves on the board of trustees, clinical research executive committee, clinical research advisory board and Women's Health Research-Working Group for the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, serves on the scientific advisory board for Emily's Entourage, serves on the respiratory health awards working group, scientific grants review committee and clinical problems assembly programming committee for the American Thoracic Society; reports consulting fees from 4D Molecular Therapeutics, Celtaxsys, Prolarean Imaging, Protalix Biotherapeutics, Proteostasis Therapeutics and Santhera Pharmaceuticals, grants to her institution from Bayer, Celtaxsys, Eloxx Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, N30 and Proteostasis Therapeutics, speaking fees from Celtaxsys and Gilead, serves on advisory board for AbbVie, Genentech, Insmed and Novartis, and is an associate editor for the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. N.J. Withers reports lecture fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and serves on an advisory board for Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Proteostasis Therapeutics. B. Ramsey reports travel fees and grants from, and serves on advisory board for Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and personal fees from Cystetic Medicines. M. Griese reports grants to his institution from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. N. Ahluwalia, S.M. Moskowitz, V. Prieto-Centurion, Y.V. Tan, S. Tian, T. Weinstock, F. Xuan and Y. Zhang are employees of Vertex and may own stock or stock options in Vertex., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Purpose of Review: With improved long-term survival and the expanding availability of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies that treat the underlying genetic defect in cystic fibrosis, more people are interested in parenthood. Cystic fibrosis care centers and people with cystic fibrosis need more information to guide decisions related to parenting., Recent Findings: Here we present currently available data on fertility, pregnancy, and parenthood in the modern era of cystic fibrosis care. Fertility may be improving in female individuals with cystic fibrosis with the use of CFTR modulator therapies, and there is an associated increase in annual pregnancies. Infertility in male individuals with cystic fibrosis remains approximately 97-98% and is unchanged with CFTR modulators in those already born with cystic fibrosis. As more female individuals with cystic fibrosis experience pregnancy, questions remain about the impact of pregnancy on their health and that of their child. Fortunately, there are multiple routes to becoming a parent; however, more work is needed to understand the impact of pregnancy and parenthood in the context of CF as some previous data suggests potential challenges to the health of parents with cystic fibrosis., Summary: We encourage cystic fibrosis care teams to have knowledge and resources available to support the reproductive goals of all individuals with cystic fibrosis., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Advances in cystic fibrosis (CF) therapies over the past decade pivotally changed the morbidity and mortality of CF with the advent of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators that rescue dysfunctional CFTR protein in individuals with eligible genotypes. However, a significant proportion of the CF population is in need of alternative treatment strategies to address CFTR variants that are ineligible for therapeutic protein correction and/or potentiation. Current drug development efforts of nucleic-acid based therapies (i.e., DNA and RNA based therapies) in CF are informed by historic challenges of CF gene therapy trials, recent FDA guidance informed by non-CF gene therapy trials, and advances in therapeutic applications related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine development. These historic and timely developments are of significant relevance for advancing genetic therapies in CF., Recent Findings: This article reviews the main themes of semi-permanent genetic therapy strategies covering recent literature focused on: adenovirus and adeno-associated virus vector delivery, advances in lentivirus vector use and safety considerations, mRNA delivery and antisense oligonucleotide drug development., Summary: Currently, drug development and clinical trials for genetic therapies in CF are rapidly progressing. This review aims to increase the foundational knowledge of CF genetic therapies., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The growing use of modulator therapies aimed at restoring cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein function in people with cystic fibrosis has fundamentally altered clinical trial strategies needed to advance new therapeutics across an orphan disease population that is now divided by CFTR modulator eligibility. The development of a robust pipeline of nucleic acid-based therapies (NABTs)-initially directed towards the estimated 10% of the cystic fibrosis population who are genetically ineligible for, or intolerant of, CFTR modulators-is dependent on the optimisation of restricted trial participant resources across multiple development programmes, a challenge that will preclude the use of gold standard placebo-controlled trials. Advancement of a full pipeline of symptomatic therapies across the entire cystic fibrosis population will be challenged by smaller effect sizes and uncertainty regarding their clinical importance in a growing modulator-treated population with more mild and stable pulmonary disease. In this Series paper, we aim to lay the foundation for clinical trial strategy and community partnership that must deviate from established and familiar precedent to advance the future pipeline of cystic fibrosis therapeutics., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests NM-H reports grants from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF), the National Institutes of Health (NIH; P30 DK 089507 and UL1 TR002319), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); consulting fees from Enterprise Therapeutics; and data safety monitoring board (DSMB) membership for the NIH. JPC is an employee of CFF. RJ reports grants from CFF; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Recode Therapeutics; honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and travel support from CFF. SHD reports contracts from Calithera, CFF, NIH (P30 DK065988), Vertex Pharmaceuticals, 4D Molecular Therapeutics, and Chiesi USA; consulting fees from Polarean, 501 Ventures, Enterprise Therapeutics, and Boehringer Ingelheim; fees for participation on advisory boards for Innova Healthcare and Boehringer Ingleheim; travel fees from Enterprise Therapeutics and CFF; and participation on a board for Abbvie. IF reports grants from AbbVie, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Insmed, GSK, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; board participation for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Kither Biotech, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and support to her institution from the European Cystic Fibrosis Society (ECFS). CHG reports grants and contracts from CFF, NIH (P30 DK 089507 and UL1 TR000423), and FDA; consulting fees from Enterprise Therapeutics; honoraria from Gilead Sciences and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; travel support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Enterprise Therapeutics; participation on the board for Novartis; stock options for Air Therapeutics; and leadership roles for the American Thoracic Society (ATS). DP reports grants from CFF (002805121), NIH, and Aclaris Pharmaceuticals; travel support from CFF; and board participation for Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Translate Bio. FR reports grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Calithera. BSQ reports grants from CFF, Cystic Fibrosis Canada, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead Sciences; honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and travel support from CFF. ETZ reports grants from NIH, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and CFF (002884121); consulting fees from CFF; travel support from CFF, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and ECFS; and participation on boards for CFF and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. SCB reports grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia (APP1102494), the Medical Research Futures Fund Australia, and CFF (BELL1480 and BELL19A0); and honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. JCD reports grants from the UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust (as part of their Clinical Trials Accelerator Platform), CFF, Cystic Fibrosis Ireland, the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, and the National Institute for Health and Care Research; and honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eloxx, Algipharma, Abbvie, Arcturus, Enterprise Therapeutics, Recode, LifeArc, Genentech, and Tavanta. JCD serves as Deputy Editor for the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. MWK reports grants from NIH (P01HL128192 and UL1TR002548) and CFF; consulting fees from AbbVie, AzurRx, Cystetic Medicines, EnBiotix, First Wave Biopharma, Insmed, Laurent Pharmaceuticals, Mylan, and PBM BC Holdings; board participation for AbbVie, CFF, First Wave Biopharma, Insmed, Laurent Pharmaceuticals, Sionna, and Vertex; and committee membership for CFF. MAM reports grants from the German Research Foundation (CRC 1449 project #431232613), the German Ministry for Education and Research (82DZL009B1), the German Innovation Fund, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; consulting fees from Abbvie, Antabio, Arrowhead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Prieris, Recode, Santhera, Splisense, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; honoraria from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; and participation on boards for Abbvie, Antabio, Arrowhead, Boehringer Ingelheim, Enterprise Therapeutics, Kither Biotec, Pari, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals. EM reports grants from Vertex Pharmaceuticals; honoraria from Vertex Phamaceuticals; travel support from Menarini; and board participation for the Cystic Fibrosis Storm Clinical Trial, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Abbvie, and Insmed. JHR reports grants from Cystic Fibrosis Canada, CFF, Vertex Phamaceuticals, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; consulting fees from Sanofi; and travel support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals. SMR reports grant funding from CFF (P30DK072482), NIH (UL1TR003096), Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos/Abbvie, Eloxx, Synspira, Translate Bio, Arcturus, Astra-Zenica, and Ionis; and consulting fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Synspira (including stock options), Renovion (including stock options), Cystetic Medicines, and Arcturus. SMR's potential competing interests were resolved or ended in 2022 or earlier. JLT-C reports grants and contracts from CFF, Vertex Pharmaceutics, Eloxx, and 4DMT; consulting fees from Vertex Phamaceuticals, Insmed, and 4DMT; participation on a DSMB for Abbvie; and participation on advisory boards for CFF, ATS, Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, and Emily's Entourage. GR-B reports grants and contracts from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and CFF. DGD reports grants from Chiesi Farmaceutici and CFF; consulting fees from Vertex and Insmed; honoraria from Chiesi and Gilead; travel support from ECFS and CFF; board participation for Momab and CSL Behring; and support from ECFS as director of the Clinical Trials Network. MJ, NRK, TL, KP, JMP, and LQ declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Following discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene in 1989 and subsequent elucidation of the varied CFTR protein abnormalities that result, a new era of cystic fibrosis management has emerged-one in which scientific principles translated from the bench to the bedside have enabled us to potentially treat the basic defect in the majority of children and adults with cystic fibrosis, with a resultant burgeoning adult cystic fibrosis population. However, the long-term effects of these therapies on the multiple manifestations of cystic fibrosis are still under investigation. Understanding the effects of modulators in populations excluded from clinical trials is also crucial. Furthermore, establishing appropriate disease measures to assess efficacy in the youngest potential trial participants and in those whose post-modulator lung function is in the typical range for people without chronic lung disease is essential for continued drug development. Finally, recognising that a health outcome gap has been created for some people and widened for others who are not eligible for, cannot tolerate, or do not have access to modulators is important., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests In the last 36 months, unrelated to this work, JLT-C has received grants to her institution from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF), the National Institutes of Health, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Eloxx, and 4DMT; she has received fees from Vertex Pharmaceuticals related to consultation on clinical research design, participation on advisory boards, and speaking engagements; and has served on advisory boards or provided clinical trial design consultation for Insmed, 4DMT, and AbbVie. JLT-C has served as chair of a data monitoring committee for AbbVie. She serves as the adult patient care representative to the CFF board of trustees, and on the CFF's clinical research executive committee, clinical research advisory board, as immediate past chair of the Cystic Fibrosis Therapeutics Development Network's Sexual Health, Reproduction and Gender Research working group, and as co-chair of the Heath Equity Team Science Awards study section. She also serves on the scientific advisory board for Emily's Entourage, on the American Thoracis Society Respiratory Health Awards Working Group, and as chair-elect of the International Conference Committee. She is an associate editor for the Journal of Cystic Fibrosis and a member of the international advisory board for The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. She serves on the Clinical Trials Review (CTLR) Study section for the National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. PDR reports that his previous institution, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, has received remuneration for services provided by the Australian Central Over-Reading Centre he established for pharmaceutical-sponsored and investigator-led studies in cystic fibrosis. This renumeration will also be the case for his current institution (the University of Queensland) moving forward. MS has received grants and research support from: GSK, Insmed, Novartis, Trudell Pharma, Tel Aviv League for Lung Diseases; consultation fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcel, GSK, Kamada, Syncrony Medical, Trumed, Zambon; and speaker's fees from AstraZeneca, Boeringer Ingelheim, GSK, Kamada, Novartis, PhysioAssist, Sanofi, and Teva. MS serves as a data and safety monitoring board member for Bonus Biotherapeutics. MS is a member of management board of EMBARC, a member of the executive committee of the Israel Society for TB and Mycobacterial Diseases, an associate editor for the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, and an editorial board member for the European Respiratory Journal and Chest. DGD reports grants from Chiesi Farmaceutici, the CF Trust, and the CFF to his institution. He reports consulting fees from Vertex and Insmed; and payments from Chiesi and Gilead for presentations. DGD receives support from the European Cystic Fibrosis Society and CFF for travel to meetings. He participates on a data and safety monitoring board for the Nomab trial and CSL Behring. He serves on the research oversight scientific board for the UK Clinical Trials Accelerator Platform and is the Director of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society Clinical Trials Network., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Following availability of the highly effective cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator modulator, elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, there was a near doubling of pregnancies reported in the United States (US) in people with CF. We sought to determine health impacts of planned (PP) versus unplanned pregnancies (UP)., Methods: We collected retrospective pregnancy data from January 2010-December 2020 from 11 US CF centers. After adjusting for potential confounding effects, we conducted multivariable, multilevel longitudinal regression analysis using mixed effect modeling to assess whether changes in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV 1 ), body mass index (BMI), and pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) 1-year-pre- to 1-year-post-pregnancy were associated with pregnancy planning., Results: Our analysis included 163 people with 226 pregnancies; the cohort had a mean age at conception of 29.6 years, mean pre-pregnancy ppFEV 1 of 75.4 and BMI of 22.5 kg/m 2 . PpFEV 1 declined in both PP (adjusted decline of -2.5 (95% CI: -3.8, -1.2)) and UP (adjusted decline of -3.0 (95% CI: -4.6, -1.4)) groups, they did not differ from each other (p = 0.625). We observed a difference in change in the annual number of PEx pre- to post-pregnancy (PP: 0.8 (0.7, 1.1); UP: 1.3 (1.0, 1.7); interaction effect p = 0.029). In a subset of people with available infant data, infants resulting from UP had more preterm births, lower APGAR scores, and more intensive care unit stays., Conclusions: Following UP, there is an increased trajectory for PEx and potentially for infant complications compared to PP. Clinicians should consider increased surveillance in the setting of UP., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that would cause bias to the content of this manuscript. GP – no conflicts; JTC, ML, AW, NW, TK, AU, MA, AR, LB, JG, DH, SM, PF, RJ – CF Foundation institutional research funding for work related to this manuscript; Additional conflicts of interest unrelated to the content of this manuscript may be included in the attached ICMJE disclosures., (Copyright © 2023 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Cystic fibrosis is a genetic disease caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, leading to dysfunction of the CFTR protein. CFTR dysfunction leads to disease in the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. Disorders of the cardiovascular system in individuals with CF are usually attributed to secondary effects from progressive lung disease. However, CFTR has been localized to vascular endothelium and smooth muscle, suggesting that CFTR dysfunction may directly impact cardiovascular function. As treatments for CF improve and life-expectancy increases, the risk of vascular disease may increase in prevalence related to primary and secondary CFTR dysfunction, chronic systemic inflammation, nutritional health and hyperglycemia in individuals with CF related diabetes. Here we review the available literature on CF and the cardiovascular system, examining the secondary effects and evidence for direct CFTR dysfunction in the heart, aorta, pulmonary vessels, and vasculature, as well as future directions and treatment options., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Taylor–Cousar reports grants and personal fees from Gilead, grants from N30, grants and personal fees from Vertex, grants and personal fees from Proteostasis, grants from Bayer, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Genentech, personal fees from Protalix, personal fees from Santhera, personal fees from 4DMT, personal fees from Polarean Imaging, personal fees from Insmed, personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Celtaxys outside the submitted work; and Service on the CF TDN Clinical Research Executive Committee, Clinical Research Advisory Board, and as Chair of the Women's Health Research Working Group as well as service as the Chair of the ATS Clinical Problems Assembly Program Committee. Dr. Zemanick reports personal fees from Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, site clinical trial support from Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Savara Pharmaceuticals Inc., and material agreements and consulting contracts with Calithera Biosciences and Concert Pharmaceuticals outside the scope of the submitted work., (Copyright © 2021 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this review is to describe on-going and upcoming real-world studies that will aid the cystic fibrosis (CF) community in understanding the long-term efficacy, safety and challenges in utilizing this therapy and managing care., Recent Findings: The triple combination of elexacaftor, tezacaftor and ivacaftor (ETI) has been demonstrated to improve lung function, weight and quality of life in children and adults with CF with at least one copy of Phe508del. Treatment with ETI will potentially be available for approximately 90% of the CF population and change the face of CF., Summary: In spite of early demonstrations of short-term efficacy and safety, for medications that may be given for much of someone's life, continued assessment of these outcomes is necessary. Furthermore, the CF community must evaluate and address the issues that arise with increased longevity including parenthood, preventive care management and the potential comorbidities of aging., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)