201. Measurement‐based V2V radio channel analysis and modelling for bridge scenarios at 5.9 GHz
- Author
-
Fuxing Chang, Kun Yang, Kehao Wang, Changzhen Li, Junyi Yu, Fang Li, and Wei Chen
- Subjects
020206 networking & telecommunications ,020302 automobile design & engineering ,02 engineering and technology ,Computer Science Applications ,Power (physics) ,Delay spread ,Beam bridge ,symbols.namesake ,Fading distribution ,0203 mechanical engineering ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,symbols ,Path loss ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,Akaike information criterion ,Algorithm ,Doppler effect ,Mathematics ,Communication channel - Abstract
In this study, vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) radio channel measurements at 5.9 GHz were conducted on a suspension bridge and a beam bridge. Given that a different structure of the two bridges will result in different channel properties, the authors study small-scale and large-scale propagation characteristics for the bridge scenarios based on measurement data. By using Akaike's information criteria, the study determines optimal small-scale fading distribution. Owing to that Ricean distribution occupies the dominant position, Ricean K-factors in the two bridge scenarios are modelled separately and compared with each other. Afterwards, power delay profiles, Doppler power spectral densities, root-mean-square (RMS) delay spread and RMS Doppler spread are estimated and analysed in different cases. They employ bimodal Gaussian mixture distribution (BGMD) to model the RMS delay spreads and the RMS Doppler spreads. Fitting results of the BGMDs show good matching levels. For the large-scale propagation characteristics, path loss model for the beam bridge scenario is proposed based on the two-ray theory. On the other hand, path loss for the suspension bridge scenario is modelled by using an empirical function derived from WINNER II. Finally, grey relational grade–mean absolute percentage error, and RMS error criteria prove the effectiveness of the two proposed path loss models.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF