Search

Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical intensive care units (SICUs). Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome remains the most important factor associated with mortality in the SICU. Illness severity scores such as the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-III (APACHE III) and the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at the time of SICU admission are useful in stratifying patients at risk for MODS and subsequent mortality. Assessment of key organ systems shows that mortality correlates with the overall severity of organ dysfunction and the number of involved organ systems, as well as to individual organs that fail. Despite the prognostic utility of SIRS/MODS, definitions of dysfunction of individual organs have shortcomings. The problem with quantitating MODS lies in the inability to adequately define organ dysfunction, especially of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and central nervous system. Biological indicators of organ dysfunction may prove to be better markers for MODS in the future.

Background: Computed tomography (CT) is used increasingly to diagnose acute appendicitis, despite variable technique and interpretation. We hypothesized that CT interpretation would not reflect actual clinical-pathologic findings in all demographic patient groups., Methods: A prospective university hospital database of 625 consecutive patients (1995-1999), all of whom were operated on for appendicitis (261, or 41.8%, within 24 hours of discretionary CT), was reviewed. CT and pathology data were obtained from final, written reports. CT criteria included free fluid or air, appendiceal visualization, mesenteric fat stranding, and blurred pericecal fat. Appendix pathology included acute, gangrenous, and perforated organs. Statistics were performed with the Fisher exact test (coordinate data) and univariate analysis of variance (continuous data); multivariate analysis of variance for independent effects on dependent variable (positive CT or pathology; P <.05)., Results: The mean age was 35 +/- 1 years with 46.6% being female patients. CT was done more often in women and after 1997 (both P <.05). The sensitivity and specificity of CT were 96.1% and 16.1%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy rate (A) were 90%, and 88%, respectively. After CT, the incidence of finding a normal appendix was lower (19.3% vs 12.3%, P <.05), especially if the white blood cell count (WBC) was normal (< or = 11K/microL, 6.1% vs 23.2%, P <.001). If the WBC was < or = 11K/microL with positive CT, PPV/A was 73. 7%/71.3%, whereas with WBC > 11K/microL and positive CT, PPV/A was 99.4%/93.3%. Multivariate analysis of variance showed that none of the individual variables used by the radiologist to determine a positive CT scan correlated with outcome determined by surgical pathology. A healthy appendix was predicted by a CT interpreted as negative and younger age (both P <.05), and especially by lower WBC (P <.0001), but not by gender or surgeon., Conclusions: Although the negative appendectomy rate was decreased by CT, there was no correlation between CT findings and pathologically proved disease. Other factors such as more precise patient selection by clinical criteria may also be improving outcome. A positive CT scan in a patient with a normal WBC should be interpreted with caution.

Modern ICUs present unique challenges to physician-administrators in the current health care environment. Several models of care (e.g., open versus closed ICUs, physician extenders in the ICU) are used throughout the country, with varying degrees of success. Although all care models may work, the ideal model for a given ICU can be found only through ongoing performance improvement.

Large-volume liposuction can be associated rarely with major medical complications and death. The case of exsanguinating retroperitoneal hemorrhage that led to cardiopulmonary arrest in an obese 47-year-old woman who underwent large-volume liposuction is described. Extensive liposuction is not a minor procedure. Performance in an ambulatory setting should be monitored carefully, if it is performed at all. Reporting of adverse events associated with outpatient procedures performed by plastic surgeons should be mandated. Hemodynamic instability in the early postoperative period in an otherwise healthy patient may be due to fluid overload, lidocaine toxicity, or to hemorrhagic shock and must be recognized and treated aggressively. Guidelines for the safe practice of large-volume liposuction need to be established.

Objectives: To document changes in serum secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) in human sepsis and in experimental endotoxemia in vivo. To compare changes in serum SLPI in human sepsis with changes in interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. To determine whether or not changes in SLPI correlate with the severity of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome as measured by the maximal multiple organ dysfunction score. Finally, because neutrophils have been implicated in tissue injury associated with organ dysfunction, to determine whether recombinant human SLPI blocks activation of isolated human neutrophils., Design: Case-control study and ex-vivo cellular assay., Setting: Surgical intensive care unit and clinical research center of university hospitals; laboratory of a medical school., Interventions: None., Measurements and Main Results: There was a significant dose-dependent elevation (50.2+/-4.0 ng/mL, p = .01) in plasma SLPI 12 hrs after administration of lipopolysaccharide to seven healthy adults (36.4+/-2.3 ng/mL). Further, serum concentrations of SLPI (132+/-15 ng/mL) were elevated in septic surgical patients compared with healthy controls (43+/-2 ng/mL, p < .01) and nonseptic surgical controls (69+/-10 ng/mL, p = .01). Serum SLPI concentrations correlated (r2 = .71, p < .01) better with organ dysfunction as measured by maximal multiple organ dysfunction score than did serum IL-6 (r2 = .49, p < .01), IL-10 (r2 = .05, p = .22), or TNF-alpha (r2 = .02, p = .44). We found that recombinant human SLPI in vitro inhibits TNF-alpha-induced hydrogen peroxide production by human neutrophils (ID50 = 1-2 microg/mL)., Conclusions: Serum SLPI is elevated in human sepsis and experimental endotoxemia. Maximal concentrations of serum SLPI correlate significantly with maximal multiple organ dysfunction scores in patients with sepsis. Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor may function to limit ongoing neutrophil-mediated tissue injury associated with organ dysfunction.

Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a recently identified immunoregulatory cytokine that shares biochemical features with IL-1beta and acts in part by inducing interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma). Endotoxic bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (1 or 2 ng/kg) was insufficient to increase plasma IL-18 in five healthy adults measured 3, 12, and 24 hr following challenge. In contrast, in the first 96 hr of admission to the surgical intensive care unit, mean maximal serum IL-18 was elevated (1,122 +/- 259 pg/ml) in nine septic patients compared to six healthy adults (191 +/- 42 pg/ml), P < 0.01). Serum IL-18 concentrations in septic patients did not correlate with other measured inflammatory mediators: tumor necrosis factor, IL-6, IL-10, or secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor. Therefore, IL-18 circulates in healthy adults and is a component of the human systemic inflammatory response. Further, stimuli other than LPS may induce IL-18 production in vivo in human sepsis.

Surgical patients are at high risk to develop nosocomial pneumonia, although an accurate diagnosis is difficult to make. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are the most common pathogens, but Acinetobacteris emerging as an important pathogen. Because affected patients are often critically ill with multisystem pathology, it can be difficult to ascribe morbidity or mortality directly to the infection.

Recent findings and recommendations on the use of antibiotics in surgery, both prophylactically and as therapy, suggest that adverse events associated with antibiotics remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Wound infection rates generally parallel the presence of one or more of three key risk factors; the overall medical condition of the patient, a prolonged operative time, and a contaminated or dirty operative field. The first choice of prophylactic drug should generally be a first- or second-generation cephalosporin, unless the patient is highly allergic to penicillin. Effective prophylaxis can almost always be achieved with a single dose of antibiotic, but the dose must be administered soon before the incision. New guidelines for the prevention of bacterial endocarditis have reduced both the types of cases that require prophylaxis, and the doses of antibiotic necessary to achieve prophylaxis. Some cases that required endocarditis prophylaxis previously no longer require prophylaxis. Rational antibiotic therapy demands rapid diagnosis and treatment. It is also crucial to distinguish among infection, contamination, and inflammation as soon as possible; contamination requires only a single dose of antibiotic, whereas sterile inflammation requires none at all. The choice of antibiotic for postoperative infection, including intra-abdominal infection, should consider the severity of illness and the risk of resistant bacteria. Failure to stratify for risk may prolong treatment unnecessarily, confound the interpretation of future studies, and increase the prevalence of bacterial resistance.

Hypothesis: Among factors postulated to affect outcome in sepsis is the gender of the patient, with a suggestion that females may have lower mortality. This study tested the hypothesis that female patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit with a documented infection have a lower mortality rate., Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data set., Setting: Surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital medical center., Methods: Analysis of a consecutive series of 1348 patients who had signs of systemic inflammatory response syndrome on admission to a surgical intensive care unit. A cohort of 443 patients (32.9%) admitted with documented infection--and who therefore had sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock--constituted the study population. For each patient, APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II and III scores, systemic inflammatory response syndrome score, gender, age, and hospital mortality were recorded. Chi2 With Fisher exact test was performed to compare mortality rates between males and females. Univariate analysis of variance was used to compare continuous variables in discrete populations. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to determine which factors independently predicted mortality., Primary Outcome Measures: Mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, and maximal multiple organ dysfunction score. Outcomes stratified by gender., Results: Patients had mean +/- SEM age of 67+/-1 years; mean +/- SEM APACHE II and III scores of 20.1+/-0.4 and 67.7+/-1.0 points, respectively. There were no demographic differences between genders. Overall, 104 (23.5%) of 443 patients with sepsis died. The difference in mortality rates between female and male patients was not significant, except in octogenarians (P = .05). Multivariate analysis of variance, APACHE III (P<.001), maximal multiple organ dysfunction score (P<.001), and female gender (P =.02) predicted mortality. In females, APACHE III (P = .03) and maximal multiple organ dysfunction score (P<.001) predicted mortality, but age did not., Conclusion: Female gender is an independent predictor of increased mortality in critically ill surgical patients with documented infection.

Complicated intra-abdominal infections are defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as those in which an operation would not remove all of the infected tissue. Therefore perforated appendicitis, although usually straightforward to treat, would be considered complicated, whereas gangrenous non-perforated appendicitis would not. Antibiotics play an adjunctive role to the surgical procedure in the management of these infections. Studies of newer antibiotics generally exclude critically ill patients, so it is unclear whether dose or duration of therapy can be addressed by such studies. Typical characteristics of anti-infective studies of intra-abdominal infection are: enrollment of upwards of 50% appendicitis cases, mortality 5%, and a clinical cure rate of 85%. Several antibiotic combinations with metronidazole are acceptable (e.g. third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin, aminoglycoside, aztreonam, or second-generation quinolone), as are several agents as monotherapy (e.g. second-generation cephalosporin, beta-lactamase agent, or third-generation quinolone). In addition to questions of dose and duration, questions have been raised regarding the value of intraoperative cultures, and whether issues of the quality of the surgical procedure can be addressed. The issue of the adequacy of surgical "source control" may be paramount, as an improper, untimely, or incorrect operation would have an overwhelmingly negative effect on outcome compared to the efficacy of the antibiotic.

In this review, both the newer noninvasive (ie, those that pose no breach of an epithelial barrier) and minimally invasive techniques relevant to the treatment of the critically ill or injured patient will be discussed. In some cases, the development of the technology is so recent that published data describing their clinical applications may be scant. The emphasis herein is on newer technologies; therefore, the discussion of certain established noninvasive techniques, such as pulse oximetry, and minimally invasive therapies, such as percutaneous abscess drainage, will be deferred.

Background: The epidemiology of penetrating abdominal trauma is changing to reflect an increasing incidence of multiple injuries. Not only do multiple injuries increase the risk of infection, a very high risk of serious infection is conferred by immunosuppression from hemorrhage and transfusion and the high likelihood of intestinal injury, especially to the colon. Optimal timing and choice of presumptive antibiotic therapy has been established for penetrating trauma, but duration has not been studied extensively in such seriously injured patients. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that 24 hours of antibiotic therapy remains sufficient to reduce the incidence of infection in penetrating abdominal trauma., Methods: Three hundred fourteen consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal trauma were prospectively randomized into two groups: Group I received 24 hours of intravenous cefoxitin (1 g q6h) and group II received 5 days of intravenous cefoxitin. The development of a deep surgical site (intra-abdominal) infection as well as any type of nosocomial infection, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (ie, surgical site infections, catheter-related infections, urinary tract, pneumonia), was recorded. Hospital length of stay was a secondary endpoint. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests for coordinate variables and two-tailed unpaired t tests for continuous variables. The independence of risk factors for the development of infection was assessed by multivariate analysis of variance. Significance was determined when P <0.05., Results: Three hundred patients were evaluable. There was no postoperative mortality, and no differences in overall length of hospitalization between groups. The duration of antibiotic treatment had no influence on the development of any infection (P = 0.136) or an intraabdominal infection (P = 0.336). Only colon injury was an independent predictor of the development of an intraabdominal infection (P = 0.0031). However, the overall infection incidence was affected by preoperative shock (P = 0.003), colon (P = 0.0004), central nervous system (CNS) injuries (P = 0.031), and the number of injured organs (P = 0.026). Several factors, including intraoperative shock (P = 0.021) and injuries to the colon (P = 0.0008), CNS (P = 0.0001), and chest (P = 0.0006), were independent contributors to prolongation of the hospital stay., Conclusions: Twenty-four hours of presumptive intravenous cefoxitin versus 5 days of therapy made no difference in the prevention of postoperative infection or length of hospitalization. Infection was associated with shock on admission to the emergency department, the number of intra-abdominal organs injured, colon injury specifically, and injury to the central nervous system. Intra-abdominal infection was predicted only by colon injury. Prolonged hospitalization was associated with intraoperative shock and injuries to the chest, colon, or central nervous system.

Background: A systemic proinflammatory response has been implicated in the pathogenesis of organ dysfunction. The effects of surgery, surgical stress, anesthesia, and subsequent intensive care unit (ICU) resuscitation may affect the components of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) score (temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and white blood cell count). Any SIRS scores calculated within 24 hours after surgery or at the onset of nonoperative resuscitation may overestimate the proinflammatory response itself, making quantitation of SIRS at that time potentially too sensitive. We hypothesized that SIRS attributable to ICU resuscitation can be quantitated, and that SIRS after the first day of therapy in the ICU correlates with several outcomes., Methods: Prospective analysis of 2300 surgical ICU admissions during a 49-month period. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III (APACHE III) scores were recorded after 24 hours. Daily and cumulative multiple organ dysfunction scores (0-4 points for each of 6 organs, 24 points total) and SIRS scores (1 point for each parameter, 4 points total) were recorded. Defined end points were hospital mortality, days in the ICU, and organ dysfunction., Results: On day 1, 49.4% of patients had SIRS (score > or =2), whereas 34.5% of patients who remained in the ICU had SIRS (score > or =2) on day 2 (P<.001). The SIRS score decreased by a mean of 0.8 points from day 1 to day 2, regardless of the type of admission. A SIRS score that decreased on day 2, in comparison with the score on day 1, resulted in less mortality than a unchanged or higher score on day 2 (11% vs. 18% vs. 22%, P<.001). Systemic inflammatory response scores were higher for nonsurvivors than survivors on each of the first 7 days in the ICU. The day 2 SIRS score correlated well with the admission APACHE III score (P<.001) and all defined end points (all P<.001). The day 2 SIRS score also correlated with the day 2 multiple organ dysfunction score (P<.001). By multiple logistic regression, APACHE III (P<.001), day 2 SIRS score (P<.01) (but not day 1 SIRS score, P = .99), and day 2 multiple organ dysfunction score (P<.001) (but not day 1 multiple organ dysfunction score, P = .81) predicted mortality., Conclusions: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome attributable to surgery or surgical stress can be quantitated. Twenty-four hours of ICU resuscitation results in a decline in the SIRS score. The magnitude of the proinflammatory response on the second ICU day may be a useful predictor of outcome in critical surgical illness.

Objective: To assess the ability of 9 clinical or biological variables to predict outcome (survival or nonsurvival) using multiple regression and classification analyses., Design: Prospective, descriptive cohort study with no interventions., Setting: Surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital and a medical school research laboratory., Patients: Eighteen patients with a documented source of infection who met currently accepted criteria for sepsis syndrome or septic shock., Main Outcome Measures: Prediction of survival or nonsurvival based on analysis of clinical (Multiple Organ Dysfunction score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III scores) and biological (plasma levels of cortisol, interleukin 6, interleukin 10, phospholipase A2, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor p75, and monocyte membrane tumor necrosis factor receptor levels) variables, with comparison of predicted and actual outcomes., Results: Plasma interleukin 6, interleukin 10, and phospholipase A2 concentrations were not significantly (P>.05) different between survivors and nonsurvivors. By standard, forward stepwise, and backward stepwise multiple regression analyses, only monocyte membrane tumor necrosis factor receptor levels measured at the onset of sepsis significantly predicted outcome in all 3 analyses. However, by both standard and backward stepwise analyses, Multiple Organ Dysfunction scores based on evaluation at the onset of sepsis and 24 hours later were also significant predictors of outcome. Classification analysis showed that assignment to outcome group was statistically significant when based on monocyte membrane tumor necrosis factor receptor levels determined at the onset of sepsis or on Multiple Organ Dysfunction scores assessed 24 hours after sepsis was diagnosed., Conclusion: Although these findings were based on a relatively small cohort, both multiple regression and classification analyses indicated that only monocyte membrane tumor necrosis factor receptor levels are able to discriminate survivors from nonsurvivors at the onset of sepsis.

Several studies indicate that norepinephrine (NE) may be more effective than dopamine for the treatment of septic shock. Nonetheless, many consider dopamine to be the pressor of choice for shock refractory to volume resuscitation. Owing to fear of excessive vasoconstriction, accentuated end-organ hypoperfusion, and the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), it is contended that NE may be deleterious. We analyzed the duration of NE use and the variables that predict mortality in a consecutive cohort of 406 surgical intensive care unit patients treated with NE for shock. Study parameters included age, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II and APACHE III scores, hospital (HLOS) and intensive care unit (ULOS) length of stay, maximal and daily multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) scores, MOD score minus cardiovascular points (MOD-CV), duration of NE infusion, and survival. The duration of NE infusion was stratified into six subsets (1, 2, 3-5, 6-10, 11-20, and > or =21 days). An age- and APACHE II and III score-matched cohort of 195 patients, in whom NE was not utilized, was identified retrospectively for comparison. The prevalence of NE use was 10.9%. NE patients developed MODS to a greater degree (11.7 +/- .3 vs. 5.9 +/- .4 points, p < .0001). NE patients had a greater degree (p < .0001) of noncardiovascular MOD as well. When stratified by survival, a greater degree of MOD occurred in both nonsurvivors and survivors of NE (both, p < .0001) compared with comparably ill patients without pressor-dependent shock. MOD scores, ULOS, and HLOS increased progressively with prolonged NE therapy (all, p < .0005), whereas mortality increased significantly only when the duration of NE infusion exceeded 10 days (p = .05). By multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA), MOD score (p < .0001), and APACHE III (p < .01) predicted mortality, but notably the duration of NE therapy failed to attain predictive value (p = .3192). Only the MOD score was predictive of HLOS (p = .0001) and ULOS (p = .003). Daily MOD scores revealed that nonsurvivors of NE therapy were admitted to the intensive care unit with a greater degree of baseline organ dysfunction than NE survivors (7.5 +/- .4 vs. 5.1 +/- .2 for survivors, p < .0001). In addition, whereas survivors showed significant improvement by Day 5 (p < .01), MOD amongst nonsurvivors remained unchanged (p = .993). Although critically ill surgical patients requiring NE support have significantly greater degrees of organ dysfunction than patients not requiring pressors, much of the organ dysfunction is present on admission. The data contradict the notion that NE facilitates the development of MODS.

Objective: The development of practice guidelines for evaluating adult patients who develop new fever in the intensive care unit (ICU) for the purpose of guiding clinical practice., Participants: A task force of 13 experts in disciplines related to critical care medicine, infectious diseases, and surgery was convened from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the Infectious Disease Society of America., Evidence: The task force members provided personal experience and determined the published literature (articles retrieved with use of MEDLINE or textbooks) from which consensus would be sought. The published literature was reviewed and classified into one of four categories, according to study design and scientific value., Consensus Process: The task force met several times in person and twice monthly by teleconference over a 1-year period to identify the pertinent literature and arrive at consensus recommendations. Consideration was given to the relationship between the weight of scientific evidence and the experts' opinions. Draft documents were composed and debated by the task force until consensus was reached by nominal group process., Conclusions: The panel concluded that because fever can have many infectious and noninfectious etiologies, a new fever in an adult patient in the ICU should trigger a careful clinical assessment rather than automatic orders for laboratory and radiological tests. A cost-conscious approach to obtaining diagnostic studies should be undertaken if they are indicated after a clinical evaluation. The goal of such an approach is to determine, in a directed manner, whether infection is present so that additional testing can be avoided and therapeutic options can be identified.

Background: As part of an ongoing prospective evaluation of the response of acute respiratory failure (ARF) to ventilation with titrated amounts of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), a subset of patients with a poor response to the initial application of PEEP and radiographic evidence of pleural effusion was identified. The effusion(s) were treated by tube thoracostomy (TT) to test the hypothesis that drainage would have a favorable effect on oxygenation and compliance in critically ill patients with substantial pulmonary dysfunction., Methods: Consecutive patients with ARF underwent a titrated progressive application of PEEP if arterial oxygen saturation was less than 90% on fraction of inspired oxygen less than 0.5. One or two thoracostomy tubes (TT) were placed afterward in patients with radiologic evidence of effusion who had a poor response to PEEP therapy. The lung injury score (LIS), PaO2:FiO2 (P:F), peak airway pressure, dynamic compliance, and TT output were recorded. Changes over time were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance with repeated measures., Results: Nineteen of 199 patients needed TT. LIS was 3.0 +/- 0.1. Maximum PEEP was 16.6 +/ 1.0 cm H2O. TT drainage was 863 +/- 164 ml in the first 8 hours. Mortality was 63% (12 of 19) but only 41% (74 of 180) in the patients who did not require TT (p = 0.11). TT improved oxygenation and compliance immediately after insertion in 17 of 19 patients, and P:F remained statistically higher (245 +/- 29 versus 151 +/- 13, p < 0.01) 24 hours after TT drainage. There was no correlation between the volume of fluid removed and P:F either immediately (R2, 0.16) or 24 hours after TT (R2, 0.07)., Conclusions: Drainage of pleural fluid resulted in a significant improvement in oxygenation in ARF patients with pleural effusions who were refractory to treatment with mechanical ventilation and PEEP. TT represents a simple and safe alternative for aggressive management of selected patients, obviating the inherent risk of pneumothorax with thoracentesis and possibly avoiding the need for more complex forms of support in this critically ill patient population.

Objective: To develop practice parameters for the evaluation of adult patients who develop a new fever in the intensive care unit (ICU) for the purpose of guiding clinical practice., Participants: A task force of 13 experts in disciplines related to critical care medicine, infectious diseases, and surgery was convened from the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine, and the Infectious Disease Society of America., Evidence: The task force members provided the personal experience and determined the published literature (MEDLINE articles, textbooks, etc.) from which consensus would be sought. Published literature was reviewed and classified into one of four categories, according to study design and scientific value., Consensus Process: The task force met several times in person and twice monthly by teleconference over a 1-yr period of time to identify the pertinent literature and arrive at consensus recommendations. Consideration was given to the relationship between the weight of scientific evidence and the experts' opinions. Draft documents were composed and debated by the task force until consensus was reached by nominal group process., Conclusions: The panel concluded that, because fever can have many infectious and noninfectious etiologies, a new fever in a patient in the ICU should trigger a careful clinical assessment rather than automatic orders for laboratory and radiologic tests. A cost-conscious approach to obtaining cultures and imaging studies should be undertaken if it is indicated after a clinical evaluation. The goal of such an approach is to determine, in a directed manner, whether or not infection is present, so additional testing can be avoided and therapeutic options can be made.

Gram-positive infections are causing more serious infections than ever before in surgical patients, who are increasingly aged, ill, and debilitated. Invasive procedures disrupt natural barriers to bacterial invasion, and indwelling catheters may act as conduits for infection. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics selects for the emergence of resistant pathogens. Potential sites of nosocomial gram-positive infections include the urinary tract, surgical site (including prosthetic devices), intravascular loci, lung and pleural space, facial sinuses, and peritoneal cavity. Responsible organisms include species from the genera Enterococcus and Staphylococcus. Methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) emerged during the 1970s, leading to a marked increase in the use of vancomycin as the treatment of choice. Vancomycin use, in turn, has been implicated (along with widespread cephalosporin use) in the emergence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) during the 1990s. Of great concern is the likely emergence of vancomycin-resistant staphylococci, which would constitute a public health emergency. Vancomycin remains the treatment of choice for infections caused by MRSA/MRSE, but rampant inappropriate use (e.g., prophylaxis in non-penicillin-allergic patients, treatment of methicillin-sensitive strains) must be curtailed. Chloramphenicol is increasingly the treatment of choice for serious VRE infections. Infection control policy must also minimize the possibility of transmission. All infected or colonized patients should be isolated and all environmental surfaces considered contaminated. Disposable gloves are mandatory for all patient contact, even incidental contact, and must be disposed of after each patient encounter. Hand-washing (the single most effective infection control measure) is mandatory after glove disposal. Gowns should be worn for direct contact with infected patients and masks used when aerosolization or splashing of secretions is likely.

Nosocomial sinusitis is common in critical illness. Randomized trials indicate that radiographic sinusitis (RS) occurs in 25%-75% of all critically ill patients and that 18%-32% of endotracheally intubated patients will develop sinusitis. Variability in the estimated incidence of RS stems from the many radiographic techniques used for diagnosis. Critically ill patients with suspected sinusitis should undergo computed tomographic scanning of all paranasal sinuses. If the scans are positive (opacification, mucosal thickening, air-fluid level), aspiration is performed after meticulous nasal disinfection. Infection is confirmed if a pathogen is identified along with neutrophils. Nosocomial sinusitis is usually caused by gram-negative bacilli or is polymicrobial. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the most common causative organism, represents 15.9% of isolates. The most common gram-positive isolate is Staphylococcus aureus (10.6%); fungi represent 8.5% of isolates. Infection is treated with aspiration and systemic antibiotics. Treatment failures are common; drainage with indwelling catheters is sometimes necessary.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cefepime hydrochloride plus metronidazole vs the combination of imipenem and cilastatin sodium in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adult patients., Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study., Setting: University-affiliated hospitals in the United States and Canada., Patients: Three hundred twenty-three patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections in whom an operative procedure or percutaneous drainage was required for diagnosis and management., Intervention: Cefepime, 2 g, was administered intravenously every 12 hours (n= 164) in addition to metronidazole, 500 mg (or 7.5 mg/kg) intravenously every 6 hours. Imipenen-cilastatin sodium, 500 mg, was administered intravenously every 6 hours (n= 159). Surgical infection management was determined by the patients' surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS: Clinical cure, defined as elimination of all signs and symptoms relevant to the original infection; and treatment failure, defined as persistence, increase or worsening of signs and symptoms resulting in an antibiotic change, requirement of an additional surgical procedure to cure the infection, or a wound infection with fever., Results: Of the initial isolates, 84% were susceptible to cefepime and 92% were susceptible to imipenem-cilastatin. Among the 217 protocol-valid patients, those treated with cefepime+metronidizole were deemed clinical cures (88%) more frequently than were imipenem-cilastatin-treated patients (76%) (P=.02). Using multivariate analysis to adjust for identified clinical risk factors for an adverse outcome (severity of presenting illness, isolation of enterococcus, type of infection, and duration of prestudy hospitalization), there was a trend (P=.06) toward a higher cure rate favoring cefepime+metronidazole. Pathogens were eradicated in significantly (P=.01) more patients treated with combined cefepime and metronidazole (89%) than with imipenem-cilastatin (76%)., Conclusion: The combination of cefepime plus metronidazole is safe and effective therapy for patients with severe intra-abdominal infections.

Recent interest in cutting cost and improving utilization and delivery of perioperative services has prompted surgeons to identify patient populations that would benefit from care in an intensive care unit as opposed to intermediate or standard care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after major plastic/reconstructive surgical procedures in order to determine appropriate perioperative management strategies for these patients. We reviewed retrospectively the data from 2,805 consecutive admissions to the SICU between 1990 and 1996. Forty-two patients (1.5%) who had undergone major plastic/reconstructive procedures were identified. Outcomes (mortality, length of stay in the SICU and hospital, and the degree of organ dysfunction) were compared between this population, an illness severity-matched (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE]-II and APACHE III) population of patients recovering from vascular surgical procedures, and a similarly matched population of SICU patients who were randomly assigned to serve as a second control group. The hospital mortality of the plastic surgical patient population (9.5%) was significantly higher than the zero mortality of the random cohort (p < 0.05). A second analysis compared the SICU plastics group to a case-controlled group of patients who were admitted to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) for at least 24 hours of perioperative monitoring. SICU patients had significantly higher APACHE II scores (10.9) when compared to PACU patients (7.2; p < 0.01). Based on severity of illness scoring and eventual mortality, patients admitted to our SICU after major reconstructive surgery were selected appropriately for that setting. In contrast, the patients who stayed in the PACU for perioperative monitoring did not require life-supporting therapy and, therefore, were overmonitored. Care could be provided in a specialized unit with dedicated nursing specifically trained for that purpose.

A critical evaluation of monitoring in critical illness must recognize first that there are many different types of monitoring that may take place, and that each type of monitor may be evaluated appropriately by different standards. Monitoring may occur with imaging devices, analyzers that require the permanent removal of tissue or fluid for analysis, or monitors that observe physiology with either invasive or noninvasive methods without requiring an ex vivo sample.

Background: Juxtahepatic inferior vena cava injuries are often lethal. Various operative strategies have been used to improve outcome, but the mortality rate reported in the literature is 80 percent or more. The atriocaval shunt has been advocated for isolation of bleeding retrohepatic vena cava, but recent reports suggest that mortality might be even higher in patients selected for shunting, perhaps owing to ongoing hemorrhage because of indecision and delay prior to insertion, or to technical difficulty with insertion. A series of patients with juxtahepatic inferior vena cava injuries treated successfully with total vascular isolation and occlusion were studied., Study Design: Consecutive series of 10 patients with penetrating injuries to the juxtahepatic inferior vena cava were treated at an urban, university-affiliated Level I trauma center. A rapid and direct approach was used along with isolation techniques similar to those used in liver transplantation and elective resection for neoplasm. As resuscitation continued, repair of the inferior vena cava was accomplished in a bloodless field, created by manual compression of the liver, wide exposure, portal inflow occlusion, and proximal and distal control of the inferior vena cava. Aggressive fluid resuscitation and transient aortic cross-clamping controlled resulting systemic hypotension., Results: Mean injury severity score was 26 and mean penetrating abdominal trauma index score was 28. After exposure, three patients had tangential injuries controlled by undersewing a partially occluding clamp. Subdiaphragmatic aortic cross-clamping was performed if total occlusion of the inferior vena cava reduced systolic blood pressure to 60 mm Hg, which was necessary in the remaining seven patients. Nine patients survived surgery, and seven of nine survived to hospital discharge. One postoperative death was a result of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and the other of necrotizing bacterial pneumonia., Conclusions: Total vascular occlusion with selective use of aortic cross-clamping yielded 70 percent survival in an injury that historically has been associated with survival of 20 percent or less. Minimization of visceral ischemia is accomplished by occluding the aorta only after complete isolation of the inferior vena cava.

Management of the vast array and sheer volume of clinical data generated during the care of the critically ill patient is a formidable task. Not only must the data be acquired accurately, but it must be retrievable readily and in an interpretable form. Such characteristics are essential features, but the mere uncritical compilation of biomedical data barely takes advantage of the enormous computing power that is available at the bedside. A complete medical informatics package can assist the caregiver with clinical decision making, suggest or even carry out changes in management, and provide continuous, always vigilant surveillance for both dangerous alterations in physiology or ill-advised orders. For optimal implementation, knowledge of the origin, synthesis, and utility of clinical information is essential. A successful implementation using the skills of physicians, nurses, biomedical engineers, computer scientists, and hospital administrators must be collaborative. The characteristics of a clinical information system were defined recently by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences (Table 1). However, even the ideal system, implemented and administered by a harmonious and committed team, will not ensure clinical acceptance. The issue of accessibility can become paramount. If the system is not responsive to the needs of the occasional user, a great deal of expensive hardware will not be used to its full capability.

Background: Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is the leading cause of death in the general surgery intensive care unit (SICU). The development of MODS is a powerful predictor of prolonged SICU stay in survivors and nonsurvivors of critical illness, but its relation to less severe illness and briefer duration of care is unknown., Objectives: To determine the relation between modest degrees of MODS and length of stay in the SICU and hospital and whether daily MOD score calculations can distinguish survivors from nonsurvivors before the SICU stay becomes prolonged., Setting: An SICU of a university tertiary care medical center., Design: Prospective inception-cohort study. Illness severity data were collected in retrospect only for the calendar year 1991., Patients: Of 2646 consecutive patients studied, 115 stayed in the SICU more than 21 days., Methods: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and III scores were calculated after 24 hours, with daily and cumulative MOD scores (0-4 points for 6 organs, 24 points maximum). Patients were followed up until hospital discharge or death. Data analysis was performed by unpaired 2-tailed t test, exact contingency analysis for multiple groups, univariate 1- or 2-way analysis of variance with repeated measures, or linear or polynomial regression tests as appropriate, alpha = .05., Results: The mean (+/-SEM) age of the patients was 65 +/- 1 years; mean (+/-SEM) APACHE II score, 13.8 +/- 0.2; APACHE III score, 44.2 +/- 0.7; incidence of MODS, 1173 of 2646 patients, 44.3%; and hospital mortality rate, 9.2%. Cumulative MOD scores correlated closely with SICU length of stay in survivors, especially for SICU stays of less than 10 days (R2 = 0.99, P < .001). Similar correlations existed between the prevalence of MODS related to the increasing length of the SICU stay (R2 = 0.98, P < .001) and between the length of hospital stay and the cumulative MOD score (R2 = 0.79, P < .05). Daily MOD scores in patients whose SICU stay was more than 21 days distinguished survivors from nonsurvivors by day 2 of the SICU stay (P < .05) and thereafter., Conclusions: Modest degrees of MODS correlate closely with the duration of care in less severely ill patients. Early identification and daily quantitation of MODS may help identify patients at risk for prolonged illness and death. Prevention of outcomes that contribute to organ dysfunction is critical for reduction of length of stay and cost of care.

The close association between infection and poor outcome in severe pancreatitis has led many investigators to hypothesize that antibiotic prophylaxis might reduce infection and thereby reduce mortality. However, despite this possible relationship, few studies of good quality have been performed in humans. Comprehensive searches using Medline and reviewing relevant published bibliographies of English-language human and experimental literature concerning acute pancreatitis or pancreatic tissue and antibiotic therapy or pharmacokinetics were conducted. Ample experimental evidence indicates that aminoglycosides penetrate pancreatic tissue poorly and that penetration of penicillins is variable, although the relevance of this is debatable, because most tissue that requires debridement in severe pancreatitis is necrotic peripancreatic retroperitoneal fat, not the pancreas itself. Although several animal studies suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis would be beneficial in severe pancreatitis, two recent randomized studies of intravenous antibiotics in humans provide conflicting data. There are insufficient data to recommend the use of selective digestive decontamination. Some justification exists for the use of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in severe pancreatitis, but the data are insufficient to mandate prophylaxis or to elevate it to the standard of care. If chosen, prophylaxis with the combination of a fluoroquinolone plus metronidazole, or monotherapy with a carbapenem antibiotic, would be most appropriate. Several other questions-including the minimum degree of severity that will benefit, the validity of endpoints other than mortality, and reduction of the need for surgical drainage-require additional trials.

Acute aortic valve rupture with resultant aortic insufficiency is a rare complication of blunt trauma. We describe a case in which a patient fell 70 feet, sustaining avulsion of two leaflets of the aortic valve along with multiple other injuries, primarily orthopedic. Our case demonstrates that patients with acute aortic regurgitation can be managed nonoperatively if necessary in the acute setting, enabling management of other significant trauma. Subsequent semielective valvular replacement may be undertaken if other injuries must take precedence.

The risk of transfer of vancomycin resistance to staphylococci is a real possibility and has been achieved in the laboratory. Prolonged colonization occurs with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and many more patients are colonized than infected. The failure to identify, isolate, and adhere to infection control measures when caring for VRE-colonized patients dooms to failure any means to control its spread. Control of vancomycin use alone is unlikely to greatly affect the number of patients at risk for VRE colonization. The global spread of VRE may be impossible to stop, but infection control measures are the most important line of defense inside hospitals.

Objective: Compelling internal and external influences are stimulating global re-evaluations of care standards for efficacy and cost. Critical care uses huge amounts of resources despite widespread shortages of beds and nurses. This study tested the hypothesis that ancillary expenditures can be decreased without compromising care., Methods: Costs for laboratory tests, radiographs, blood products, nutritional supplements, and drugs were compared prospectively for all surgical intensive care unit care for two 4-month periods (January 1 to April 30, 1994 and January 1 to April 30, 1995) at a urban university center. A systematic, multidisciplinary cost-reduction program began May 1, 1994, with emphasis on laboratory and radiographic testing and procedures, and blood product, nutritional, and drug therapies. Cohorts were compared by age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and III admission scores, and case mix. Outcome variables were hospital mortality, days in the intensive care unit and hospital, the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and expenditures. Cost data were taken weekly from the hospital's clinical information system. No new equipment was introduced during the study period except for pumps for patient-controlled analgesia, and there were no new critical pathways or other patient care guidelines., Results: Case mix and all noncost variables were identical. Overall costs were reduced by 29% when normalized by the number of patient-days in each period. Laboratory testing was reduced in frequency by 24 to 32%, and cost by 26 to 28%. Comparable reductions in the cost of blood products (32%) were exceeded by the reductions in expenditures for nutritional supplements (49%) and pharmaceuticals (45%) (all, p < 0.01 or less). Modestly increased (2%) x-ray charges in 1995 were owing entirely to insertion of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters (each, $2,800, n = 5) and computed tomography scans for sinusitis (each, $350, n = 5), although the 7% reduction in portable chest radiographs that was achieved did not meet expectations., Conclusions: Substantial reductions in physician-ordered ancillary expenditures are possible without compromising the standard of care of critically ill patients, or the support of an elaborate framework of defined care plans. With additional experience, incremental savings may accrue from refinement of successful strategies and new approaches to intractable problems.

Objective: There is disagreement over the reliability of technetium Tc 99m (99mTc)-labeled erythrocyte scintigraphy in the localization of active lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. A previous study at The New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center that showed a superior sensitivity for localization of scintigraphy versus angiography in surgical patients led the authors to emphasize scintigraphy as the diagnostic test of first choice in the clinical diagnostic algorithm. The authors hypothesized that tagged erythrocyte scintigraphy can be used accurately as the primary diagnostic modality in localizing acute bleeding and guiding surgical intervention., Methods: The authors conducted a 5-year, retrospective analysis of 224 inpatients who underwent scintigraphic imaging for diagnosis and localization of active lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Using scintigraphy as the primary diagnostic test, with colonoscopy, upper endoscopy, and angiography as adjunctive studies, 99mTc-labeled erythrocyte scans were performed at the clinician's discretion and were reviewed again for study purposes by two nuclear radiologists who were blinded to clinical outcome. Adjunctive diagnostic tests also were ordered for clinical indications., Results: Using delayed periodic scintigraphic imaging, results of 115 scans (51.3%) demonstrated bleeding, with 96 scans (42.9%) localizing to a specific anatomic site. Patients with positive scans were five times more likely to require surgery (p < 0.005) than patients with negative scans, and surgical patients were twice as likely to localize by scintigraphy (p < 0.0001). Fifty patients (22.3%) required surgical intervention to control hemorrhage and had a bleeding site confirmed by both clinical and pathologic examinations. Forty-eight of those patients (96%) had a bleeding site determined preoperatively. For 37 patients with bleeding sites localized preoperatively by scintigraphy, 36 (97.3%) had correct localization based on surgical pathology. Only one patient required a subtotal colectomy solely because of nonlocalized bleeding. No patient bled postoperatively, and there was no mortality in either operated or nonoperated patients. The mean volume of transfused erythrocytes was similar in both scan-localized and nonlocalized surgical patients., Conclusion: When performed correctly and interpreted conservatively, scintigraphy is a useful and safe means of guiding segmental resection, and should be the primary tool used in the diagnosis of patients with active lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

A case of "wandering spleen" associated with recurrent pancreatitis and diagnosed with computed tomography (CT), is reported. The entity was also associated with a rotated, distended stomach, gastric outlet obstruction secondary to extrinsic compression of the duodenum, and partial small bowel obstruction secondary to extrinsic compression of a mobile, distended cecum that lay under the right diaphragm.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and clinical significance of hypolipidemia found in critically ill patients, and whether the addition of a reconstituted lipoprotein preparation could inhibit the generation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in acute-phase blood taken from these patients., Setting: Surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of a large urban university hospital., Design: Prospective case series., Patients: A total of 32 patients with a variety of critical illnesses had lipid and lipoprotein concentrations determined. Six patients and six age- and gender-matched control subjects had whole blood in vitro studies of the effect of lipoprotein on lipopolysaccharide mediated TNF-alpha production., Interventions: Blood samples were drawn on admission to the ICU and over a subsequent 8-day period., Measurements and Main Results: Mean serum lipid and lipoprotein values obtained from patients within 24 hrs of transfer to the surgical ICU were extremely low: mean total cholesterol was 117 mg/dL (3.03 mmol/L), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 71 mg/dL (1.84 mmol/L), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 25 mg/dL (0.65 mmol/L). Only the mean triglyceride concentration of 105 mg/dL (1.19 mmol/L), and the mean lipoprotein(a) concentration of 25 mg/dL (0.25 g/L) were within the normal range. During the first 8 days following surgical ICU admission, there were trends toward increasing lipid and lipoprotein concentrations that were significant for triglycerides and apolipoprotein B. Survival did not correlate with the lipid or lipoprotein concentrations, but patients with infections had significantly lower (p = .008) high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations compared with noninfected patients. Lipopolysaccharide-stimulated production of TNF-alpha in patient and control blood samples was completely suppressed by the addition of 2 mg/mL of a reconstituted high-density lipoprotein preparation., Conclusions: Patients who are critically ill from a variety of causes have extremely low cholesterol and lipoprotein concentrations. Correction of the hypolipidemia by a reconstituted high-density lipoprotein preparation offers a new strategy for the prevention and treatment of endotoxemia.

Objective: To assess peripheral blood monocyte tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) levels and plasma soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (sTNFR) concentrations in critically ill patients with sepsis syndrome., Design: Prospective, descriptive cohort study with no interventions., Setting: Surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary-care hospital associated with a university medical school., Patients: Twenty-one patients with a documented source of infection who met currently accepted criteria for sepsis syndrome/septic shock., Main Outcome Measures: Plasma sTNFR p55 and p75 values were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and monocyte TNFR levels were assessed by fluorescence flow cytometry after the monocytes were stained with biotinylated human recombinant TNF-alpha and streptavidin-phycoerythrin., Results: Compared with healthy controls, plasma sTNFR p55 and p75 values were significantly higher (P <.01) in both surviving and nonsurviving patients with sepsis; in nonsurviving patients with sepsis, however, only sTNFR p55 values were significantly (P < .05) higher than in surviving patients with sepsis. By contrast, monocytes from the nonsurviving patients with sepsis manifested a significant (P < .01) and sustained (up to 4 days) decrease in cell surface TNFR values compared with either the normal controls or the surviving patients with sepsis., Conclusions: Assessment of monocyte surface TNFR values may provide a rapid prognostic indicator for patients with sepsis who are at increased risk of death.