251. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: Any controversy?
- Author
-
Chong, Charing Ching-Ning, Chiu, Philip Wai-Yan, Lee, Kit-Fai, and Lai, Paul Bo-San
- Subjects
- *
CHOLECYSTITIS , *LAPAROSCOPIC surgery , *LAPAROSCOPY , *CHOLECYSTECTOMY , *GALLBLADDER surgery - Abstract
Objective: The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis remains controversial. This article reviews the latest evidence for the timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis. Methodology: Trials comparing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC; carried out within 1 week of onset of symptoms) versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC; carried out at least 6 weeks after symptoms settled) for acute cholecystitis were identified from Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library and PubMed database. Only meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials were reviewed. Results: A total of seven prospective randomized trials including 670 patients and four meta-analyses were reviewed. ELC was superior to DLC in terms of a shorter hospital stay without any significant difference in perioperative mortality and morbidity. Conclusions: Current evidence supports ELC as the preferred treatment strategy for acute cholecystitis. It allows a shorter hospital stay, but shares similar operative morbidity, mortality and conversion rate as DLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF