Search

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) are on the rise in the United States, especially among men who have sex with men, HIV-positive or other immunocompromised patients, and women with a history of cervical, vaginal, or vulvar cancer. Strong evidence supports the human papillomavirus as the causative factor in anal dysplasia; reducing the risk of HPV infection can reduce rates of ASCC. High-risk patients should be screened for AIN, but no universal screening guidelines exist, and more studies are needed to develop a national protocol for screening and management of patients with AIN.

This study explores understanding of primary and secondary prevention of anal cancer among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected foreign-born Latino gay and bisexual men (GBM). Between August 2015 and December 2016, researchers conducted 33 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with HIV-infected foreign-born Latino GBM. Interview questions sought to determine participants’ knowledge and perceived barriers and facilitators to primary and secondary prevention of anal cancer. Researchers analyzed interview transcripts using a qualitative content analysis approach. For primary prevention, men reported a lack of knowledge about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. However, for secondary prevention, roughly 60% of participants had previously screened for anal dysplasia via anal Papanicolaou (Pap) smear. However, participants reported willingness to screen, and provider recommendation was the most common screening facilitator. Men reported stigma related to their HIV status, sexual orientation, and anal Pap smear procedures as anal cancer screening barriers. Participants reported willingness to use a self-screening anal Pap smear test if it was commercially available. Health providers continue to be the leading source of health information. Therefore, provider recommendation for HPV vaccination and anal cancer screening among age-eligible foreign-born Latino HIV-infected GBM is critical. More work is needed to destigmatize HIV and sexual orientation to influence positive health behaviors among this population. Future intervention research could test the effects of provider-led interventions and also media campaigns aimed at influencing HPV vaccine uptake and anal cancer screening among this population.

Zusammenfassung: Die Inzidenz des Analkarzinoms nimmt weltweit zu, vor allem bei männlichen homosexuellen Patienten. Als hauptsächlicher Risikofaktor für die Entstehung des Analkarzinoms gilt die anale Infektion mit dem humanen Papillomavirus (HPV). Die Prävalenz der analen HPV-Infektion bei HIV-negativen homosexuellen Männern beträgt 50-60%. Bei HIV-positiven homosexuellen Männern liegt die Prävalenz bei nahezu 100%. Die HPV-assoziierte anale intraepitheliale Neoplasie (AIN) gilt als Vorläuferläsion des Analkarzinoms. Bei etwa 20% der HIV-negativen homosexuellen Männer lässt sich eine AIN diagnostizieren, wobei bei 5-10% eine hochgradige Epitheldysplasie (AINII-III) vorkommt. Die Prävalenz der hochgradigen AIN ist jedoch mit bis zu 50% bei HIV-positiven homosexuellen Patienten bedeutend höher. Trotz der Häufigkeit von HPV-bedingten analen Epitheldysplasien und der zunehmenden Fälle von Analkarzinomen gibt es aber noch immer keinen Konsens bezüglich des Screenings, der Therapie und der Überwachung von Patienten mit AIN. Im Falle eines Analkarzinoms ist unabhängig vom HPV- oder HIV-Status heute noch immer die Radiochemotherapie mit 5-FU und MitomycinC Standard

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive women and women with transplant-associated immunocompromise are at increased risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer compared with healthy, immunocompetent women. HPV often manifests as a "field" effect in immunocompromised women who are also at increased risk for vaginal, vulval, and anal intraepithelial neoplasia. Immunocompromised women require careful follow-up with regular cy-tologic screening, and there should be a low threshold for performing colposcopic evaluation in these women. Once detected, CIN should be treated aggressively and the patient followed up closely for recurrence. Although treatment regimens are similar for immunocompromised and healthy women, the former may need multiple treatment modalities. Data on the ability of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to reduce the incidence of high-grade CIN and on the regression of existing CIN are mixed, some studies showing no benefit and others a modest benefit from HAART. However, the incidence of cervical cancer has not declined since the introduction of HAART, and the use of HAART among HIV-positive women has not changed the suggested approach to cervical cancer screening and treatment. Finally, prophylactic HPV vaccination offers the possibility of reducing the burden of disease among immunocompromised women, particularly if they are vaccinated before the onset of both sexual activity and immunocompromise. However, studies are needed to document safety and immunogenicity, and -given their high rate of prior HPV exposure -the effectiveness of the vaccine in these women.

Case Presentation A 32-year-old man presented with fever, nonproductive cough, diffuse lymphadenopathy, and polyarticular pain for 2 weeks. His medical history included HIV diagnosed 10 years ago, anal intraepithelial neoplasia, Kaposi sarcoma, and herpes simplex virus-2 infection. The patient was not receiving antiretroviral therapy or antibiotic prophylaxis, and his last known CD4 count a month before was 45 cells/mm3. He was prescribed a course of doxycycline by his primary care physician, which did not improve his symptoms.

This study explores HIV-positive gay and bisexual men's (GBM) understanding of human papillomavirus (HPV) and the HPV vaccine.Researchers conducted 15 in-depth interviews with HIV-positive GBM between the ages of 18-30 years old.Two participants had received a single dose of the HPV vaccine. Otherwise, the majority of participants had either never heard of the HPV vaccine or they perceived it as a resource for women only. Other commonly cited barriers to getting the vaccine included lack of provider recommendation to complete the vaccine series and vaccine costs.Future provider-driven interventions should focus on increasing HPV vaccine among age-eligible HIV-positive GBM.

Objective: The protective effect of ART has not yet been definitively established in MSM. We aimed to characterize the factors associated with persistent HIV-1 RNA rectal shedding. Methods: Prospective study including virologically suppressed MSM from an HIV cohort. High-resolution anoscopy (HRA) was performed for screening of anal dysplasia, and rectal sampling for HIV-1 RNA quantification and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) investigation through multiplex PCR. Both generalized linear mixed (GLM) and zero-altered negative binomial (ZANB) models were performed. Results: One hundred and fifty-five rectal swab samples from 132 virologically suppressed MSM were included. HIV-1 RNA was detectable in 61 (39.3%) samples, with median (IQR) rectal viral load (rVL) of 295.8 (158.8-522) copies/swab. Multivariable GLM showed that the presence of high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-AIN; OR 2.85 [95% CI 1.10-7.38]) and a protease inhibitor-based regimen (OR 2.49 [0.98-6.34]) resulted in increased risk for rectal HIV-1 shedding, whereas higher nadir CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell ratio (OR 0.18 [0.04-0.93]) was negatively associated with rectal shedding. ZANB analyses showed that the best predictors of having detectable rVL were lower nadir CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell ratio (OR 0.98 [0.96-0.99]) and PI-based regimens (OR 4.85 [1.29-18.24]); the presence of HG-AIN (RR 2.50 [1.41-4.45]), and a higher burden of STIs (RR 1.39 [1.03-1.85]) were predictors of rectal HIV-1 shedding intensity. Conclusion: The prevalence of HIV-1 RNA rectal shedding is high in virologically suppressed MSM. In addition to ART and the immune system integrity, local factors, including the co-existence of HG-AIN and the burden of STIs, may account for the persistence of HIV-1 RNA shedding in rectal mucosa. Copyright (C) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) is a precursor to invasive anal squamous cell carcinoma. Histologic evaluation is hampered by intra- and interobserver variability. Various biomarkers have been investigated to improve the accuracy and reproducibility of diagnosis and grading, but interpretation can be challenging. ProEx™ C is an antibody cocktail for proteins upregulated in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. This study investigated ProEx™ C's role alone and with p16 and Ki-67 in the diagnosis and grading of AIN. Sixty-seven anal tissue samples (22 AIN I, 25 AIN II/III, and 20 non-dysplastic) were stained for ProEx™ C, Ki-67, and p16. Staining patterns were recorded and correlated with morphologic diagnoses. Considering AIN II/III vs I, full-thickness ProEx™ C staining was more frequent in AIN II/III (p = 0.0373), and showed the highest sensitivity of the biomarkers. In combination with Ki-67, sensitivity was lower, but specificity for AIN II/III rose to 83%. For differentiating non-dysplasia from AIN I, negative ProEx™ C staining correlated with non-dysplasia (p < 0.0001) and had the highest sensitivity (90%). In combination with Ki-67, sensitivity dropped to 80%, but specificity was high (96%). ProEx™ C is useful for diagnosing and grading AIN, performing as well or better than other markers at identifying AIN II/III and non-dysplastic epithelium.

The necessity for routine histopathologic evaluation of hemorrhoidectomy specimens considered free of suspicious areas after careful visual and manual inspection remains controversial.The purpose of this work was to prospectively study the prevalence of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in macroscopically normal operative specimens.From October 2005 to September 2010, all hemorrhoidectomy and fissurectomy specimens were sent for routine histopathologic analysis.This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center.The primary outcome measured was the histopathologic examination of surgical samples.Among the specimens from 2997 procedures, routine histopathologic evaluation found anal intraepithelial neoplasia in 97 patients (3.2%), despite the fact that visual and manual inspection had determined that the specimens were free of any suspected anal intraepithelial neoplasia or human papillomavirus-related lesion. The pathological diagnoses for these macroscopically normal specimens were AIN1 in 22 (23%) patients, AIN2 in 48 (49%) patients and AIN3 in 27 (28%) patients, making the prevalence of high-grade and low-grade disease 2.5% (anal intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3) and 0.7% (anal intraepithelial neoplasia 1).This study was limited by being a single-center study.This prospective single-center study demonstrated that the prevalence of infraclinical anal intraepithelial neoplasia in macroscopically normal hemorrhoidectomy and fissurectomy specimens is not negligible (3.2% with 2.5% high-grade disease).

The review examined the role of HPV in anogenital diseases. There are presented modern data on the prevalence of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN), HPV infection of the anal region among women at risk (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia - CIN, vulvar - VIN, vaginal - VaIN). There are considered methods of diagnosis of HPV-associated anogenital diseases. Analyzes the literature on the importance of the development of screening AIN in patientswith CIN, VIN, VaIN. There are presented data of the preliminary results of the research of HPV infection of the anal region in patients with genital neo-plasias, the data on different tropism of HPV to cervical epithelium and the epithelium of the anal region.

In the review the role of HPV infection in development of diseases of anogenital area and methods of diagnostics and treatment of HPV infection of anogenital area is considered. Pathogenetic justification of application of preparations with immunomodulatory action is given in complex treatment of the diseases associated with HPV infection.

Anal cancer is biological similar to cervical cancer, and is preceded by anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN). Screening for AIN and treatments to reduce the risk of anal cancer are not established as guidelines of care for HIV-infected patients. It is mainly because screening and treating of AIN is not yet proven to reduce the incidence of anal cancer. The present study preliminarily demonstrated that a successful screening program in preventing squamous cell anal cancer in HIV positive patients. The authors achieved their purpose of controlling the evolution of all abnormalities identified during the anal cancer screening, preventing AIN to progress towards anal cancer, and reversing any form of AIN by surgery, ablation or medical therapy. Randomized controlled multi-center trials with a large sample size should be carried out to validate the study results. It is wise for the physicians to actively screen and treat AIN in HIV-infected patients whenever possible unless the results of randomized controlled study demonstrate that doing so is inappropriate.

The aim of this study is to determine whether immunohistochemistry for Stathmin-1 enhances diagnostic accuracy of anal dysplasia. The study included 40 biopsies with diagnosis of benign anal transitional zone (n=10), low-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) (AIN1, n=10), and high-grade AIN (AIN2, n=10, AIN3, n=10). The cases were selected to represent classic features. Immunohistochemistry for Stathmin-1, p16, and Ki-67 was performed and assessed for distribution within epithelial thickness. Stathmin-1 was expressed only in the basal layer of benign anal epithelium. Similar pattern of distribution was seen in all low-grade AIN cases (100%). In total, 40% of AIN2 showed Stathmin-1 staining pattern similar to AIN1. The other 60% of cases showed staining extending into the middle third of the epithelial thickness. Of AIN3 cases, 20% showed staining confined to the lower third epithelium, 20% showed staining extending to the middle third, and 60% showed staining extending into the upper third epithelium. The pattern of stain distribution suggested that staining extending above the lower one-third of the epithelial thickness discriminates between low-grade and high-grade AIN. With this cutoff, the sensitivity for the diagnosis of high-grade AIN was 70%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value equaled 100%, and negative predictive value equaled 77%. P16INK4a showed 100% sensitivity for AIN2 and AIN3, whereas Ki-67 had 100% sensitivity for any AIN grade. In conclusion, Stathmin-1 has excellent specificity for the diagnosis of high-grade AIN; however, Stathmin-1 alone may not be sufficiently sensitive. Use in conjunction with other sensitive markers, such as p16 or Ki-67 may be considered.

Background Safety and immunogenicity of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus (qHPV) vaccine were evaluated in HIV-positive Spanish MSM. The prevalence of High Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions (HSIL) and genotypes of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) were also determined, as well as risk factors associated with the presence of HR-HPV in anal mucosa. Methods This is a randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of the quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccine. The study enrolled from May 2012 to May 2014. Vaccine and placebo were administered at 0, 2 and 6 months (V1, V2, V3 clinical visits). Vaccine antibody titres were evaluated at 7 months. Cytology (Thin Prep® Pap Test), HPV PCR genotyping (Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test), and high-resolution anoscopy (Zeiss 150 fc© colposcope) were performed at V1. Results Patients (n = 162; mean age 37.9 years) were screened for inclusion; 14.2% had HSIL, 73.1% HR-HPV and 4.5% simultaneous infection with HPV16 and 18. Study participants (n = 129) were randomized to qHPV vaccine or placebo. The most common adverse event was injection-site pain predominating in the placebo group [the first dose (83.6% vs. 56.1%; p = 0.0001]; the second dose (87.8% vs. 98.4%; p = 0.0001); the third dose (67.7% vs. 91.9%; p = 0.0001). The vaccine did not influence either the viral load of HIV or the levels of CD4. Of those vaccinated, 76% had antibodies to HPV vs. 30.2% of those receiving placebo (p = 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, Older age was associated with lower HR-HPV infection (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.96–0.99), and risk factor were viral load of HIV >200 copies/µL (RR 1.42 95% CI 1.17–1.73) and early commencement of sexual activity (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.001–1.811). Conclusions This trial showed significantly higher anti-HR-HPV antibody titres in vaccinated individuals than in unvaccinated controls. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the vaccine. In our cohort, 1 of every 7 patients had HSIL and the prevalence of combined infection by genotypes 16 and 18 was low. This suggests that patients could benefit from receiving qHPV vaccine. Older age was the main protective factor against HR-HPV infection, and non-suppressed HIV viremia was a risk factor. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN14732216 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14732216).

Background and aims: Men who have sex with men (MSM) infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have the highest risk of developing anal cancer (AC). The objective of this study was to describe our screening implementation program in this population, and report the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) anal infection, and cytological and histological findings in a Spanish medium-size community (Vigo, Spain). Method: Prospective cohort analysis of 240 HIV-infected MSM. Cellular anal sample and high risk HPV (HR-HPV)-tests were performed to study cytological changes and HPV genotyping. High resolution anoscopy (HRA) was performed in 209 patients. Results were analyzed with respect to epidemiological, clinical and analytical factors. Results: Of 209 patients selected for HRA, the prevalence of HR-HPV anal infection, cytological and histological alterations was 85.6%, 47.5%, and 39.8%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for ≥ ASCUS (atypia of squamous cells of undetermined significance) cytology in relation to histological alterations were 61% and 85%, (OR: 8.7; IC 95%: 4.4-17.2), respectively. Observed concordance between high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) cytology and HSIL anal intraepithelial neoplasia types 2 and 3 (AIN-2/3) histology was 64% (OR: 11.4; IC 95%: 3.6-36.7). One patient with HSIL cytology presented a prevalent anal squamous carcinoma. Conclusions: HRA was feasible with similar results to relevant groups. There was a high prevalence of anal HR-HPV infection, and cytological and histological alterations. Antecedentes y objetivos: los hombres VIH que tienen sexo con hombres (VIH-HSH) presentan la mayor incidencia de cáncer anal (CA). El estudio tiene como objetivo conocer la prevalencia de la infección anal por virus del papiloma humano de alto riesgo (VPH-AR) y de los hallazgos citológicos e histológicos, así como la implementación de un programa de cribado en el contexto de una ciudad media española, Vigo (España). Método: análisis prospectivo de una cohorte de 264 hombres (VIH-HSH). A los pacientes se les realizó una citología anal y genotipado de VPH-AR para el estudio de la prevalencia de alteraciones citológicas y de la infección VPH-AR. A 209 se les realizó una anoscopia de alta resolución (AAR). Los resultados se relacionaron con variables epidemiológicas, clínicas y analíticas. Resultados: de los 209 pacientes seleccionados, la prevalencia de VPH-AR, alteraciones citológicas e histológicas anales fue de 85,6%, 47,5% y 39,3% respectivamente. La sensibilidad y especificidad para la citología ≥ ASCUS (atipia de células escamosas de significado indeterminado) respecto a las alteraciones histológicas fue de 61% y 85% (OR: 8,7; IC95%: 4,4-17,2), respectivamente. La concordancia observada entre la citología HSIL (lesión escamosa intraepitelial de alto grado) e histología HSIL (AIN-2/3, neoplasia intraepitelial tipo 2 y 3) fue del 64%,(OR: 11,4; IC95%: 3,5-36,7). Un paciente con citología HSIL presentó cáncer escamoso anal prevalente. Conclusiones: la AAR resultó factible y con resultados similares a los de grupos relevantes. Gran prevalencia de la infección anal por VPH-AR y de alteraciones citológicas e histológicas.

Condylomaacuminata, anal intraepithelial neoplasia and anal cancer are diseases that commonly afflict men who have sex with men (MSM). The disease process may often be complicated by a coexisting infection with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). Other than patients with HIV and MSM populations, transplant recipients on immunosuppression or other immunosuppressed states, and women with a history of genital cancers are at increased risk [1, 2] High risk populations have been encouraged to undergo screening with anal pap smear with increasing frequency and intensity over recent years. However, the appropriate follow-up, diagnostic work-up and treatment modality for patients with a positive smear remains nebulous.

Increased anorectal human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is related to the recent trends in sexual behavior in both homosexual and heterosexual groups and prevalence of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Clinical presentation and natural history depend on the serotype involved. HPV 6 and 11 are found in the benign wart. Local control can be achieved with a wide selection of surgical and topical techniques. HPV 16, 18, and 31 are found in dysplastic lesions and have the potential to progress to invasive anal squamous cell carcinoma. Recognition and early management of dysplastic lesions is crucial to prevent the morbidity and mortality associated with anal cancer. While low-grade lesions can be closely observed, high-grade lesions should be eradicated. Different strategies can be used to eradicate the disease while preserving anorectal function. Studies on the efficacy of vaccination on anorectal HPV showed promising results in select population groups and led to the recent expansion of current vaccination recommendations.

Aim There is debate about whether the traditional three-tiered grading of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) should be replaced by a more reproducible two-tiered system. In this study, we review our experience with AIN to determine the most suitable classification system. Method We performed a retrospective review of all histological reports over a 19 year period. All specimens were graded on haemataloxin and eosin appearance and those with dysplasia had immunohistochemistry for p16 and Ki67 performed. Results Cases included 25 condyloma acuminata, 11 dysplastic cases and 24 invasive squamous cell carcinomas. On review, 18 were classified as condyloma acuminata without dysplasia. Seven had AIN I, five had AIN II and six had AIN III when using a three-tiered system. All cases classified as dysplastic (n = 18) showed an increased proliferation index as measured by Ki67. p16 positivity was seen in all AIN III, two AIN II and none of the AIN I cases. Recurrence was not observed in any of the AIN I cases. Five of eleven AIN II and AIN III cases recurred or persisted at a similar, higher or lower grade. Both of the AIN II cases which recurred or persisted were p16 positive. None of the AIN II cases that were p16 negative recurred. Three of the p16-positive AIN III cases did not recur. None of the 18 AIN cases progressed to carcinoma. Conclusion The findings support the slow progression of AIN as described in the literature. In our small series, a two-tiered system with further subclassification of the traditional AIN II group using p16 appears to be clinically useful.

Resumen Introduccion La neoplasia intraepitelial anal se considera una lesion precursora del carcinoma escamoso anal. La poblacion de mayor riesgo de padecer esta lesion son pacientes inmunodeprimidos, especialmente los infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH), con practicas de sexo anal. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir los habitos sexuales de los pacientes atendidos en la consulta de infecciones de transmision sexual (ITS) en nuestro servicio, a los que se les realizo una citologia anal, asi como la presencia de otras ITS. Material y metodos Se realizo un estudio descriptivo de aquellos pacientes a los que, de acuerdo con nuestro protocolo, se les realizo una citologia anal entre 2008 y 2011. Asimismo, se realizo una encuesta sobre habitos sexuales y cribado de otras ITS. Finalmente, se llevo a cabo un estudio descriptivo y analitico bivariado valorando la distribucion de la alteracion citologica y el grado de displasia anal. Resultados Se incluyeron un total de 347 citologias anales, con un 48,1% de citologias alteradas. Se encontraron diferencias estadisticamente significativas entre la presencia de condilomas perianales/endoanales, la infeccion por VIH, la infeccion por Chlamydia trachomatis y la presencia de alteracion citologica. Conclusion La displasia anal tiene una alta prevalencia en nuestro medio en determinados grupos con habitos sexuales de riesgo, pero probablemente este infradiagnosticada por su caracter subclinico y la falta de un protocolo de cribado bien establecido.

Unfortunately, the "Informed consent" statement was incorrectly published in the original version. The complete correct reference should read as follows.

Diagnosis, follow up, and treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia are complex and not standardized. This may be partly caused by poor communication of biopsy and cytology findings between pathologists and clinicians as a result of a disparate and confusing terminology used to classify these lesions. This article focuses on general aspects of epidemiology and on clarifying the current terminology of intraepithelial squamous neoplasia, its relationship with human papilloma virus infection, and the current methods that exist to diagnose and treat this condition.

BACKGROUND: High-resolution anoscopy is increasingly advocated to screen HIV+ men who have sex with men for anal cancer and its precursor lesions, anal intraepithelial neoplasia. A systematic comparison between clinical features and the histopathology of suspect lesions is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze interobserver agreement in classifying features of intra-anal lesions suspect for anal intraepithelial neoplasia and to compare these features with their histopathological outcome. DESIGN: This study is a cross-sectional survey regarding high-resolution anoscopy with images and biopsies of suspect lesions. Two dermatologists experienced in high-resolution anoscopy, blinded for histopathological outcome, independently classified the lesions on clinical features. SETTING: This investigation was conducted at the Dermatology outpatient clinic of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Included in the study were 163 HIV+ men who have sex with men, older than 18 years, with no history of anal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the -coefficient for interobserver agreement and the proportions of anal intraepithelial neoplasia per clinical feature. RESULTS: Three hundred four biopsies were taken from 163 patients. One hundred sixty-eight biopsies (55%) showed anal intraepithelial neoplasia, and 67/304 (22%) showed high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia. The -coefficient was 0.65 for condylomatous lesions, 0.14 for surface configuration, 0.54 for punctation, 0.08 for mosaicism, and 0.43 for atypical vessels. Condylomatous lesions showed high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia in 18% (95% CI, 11%-27%). In lesions with flat leukoplakia, punctation, and atypical vessels, high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia was seen in 25%, 30%, and 23%. In lesions with the combination punctation/atypical vessels and punctation/flat leukoplakia/atypical vessels, high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia was found in 38% and 40%. LIMITATIONS: We did not take biopsies of healthy-looking mucosa. Furthermore, the real-time description of features during high-resolution anoscopy, instead of the use of images, would improve the recognition of subtle mucosal abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: A moderate to substantial interobserver agreement was demonstrated in recognizing condylomas, punctation, and atypical vessels. Furthermore, high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia is present in a high proportion of intra-anal condylomata. A combination of punctation, flat leukoplakia, and atypical vessels is the best predictor for high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia

Key points Anal intraepithelial lesions are caused by chronic infection with oncogenic types of human papillomavirus. Their incidence and prevalence are increasing, especially among patients with HIV infection. Their natural history is not well known, but high-grade intraepithelial lesions seem to have an important risk to progress to squamous cell carcinoma. Their treatment can be achieved by many ways (surgery, coagulation, imiquimod, etc.) but there is a high rate of recurrent lesions. Pretherapeutic evaluation should benefit from high-resolution anoscopy. Periodic physical examination and anal cytology may probably be interesting for screening the disease among patients with risk factors. Vaccine against oncogenic types of papillomavirus may prevent the development of anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Purpose: High-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia (HGAIN) is the precursor lesion to invasive anal cancer. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination holds great promise for preventing anal cancer. Methods: We examined 235 HIV-1-infected men screening for participation in a multisite clinical trial of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine. All participants had anal swabs obtained for HPV testing and cytology and high-resolution anoscopy with biopsies of visible lesions to assess for HGAIN. Results: HPV types 16 and 18 were detected in 23% and 10%, respectively; abnormal anal cytology was found in 56% and HGAIN in 30%. HGAIN prevalence was significantly higher in those with HPV16 detection compared to those without (38% vs 17%; P = .01). Use of antiretroviral therapy and nadir and current CD4+ cell count were not associated with abnormal anal cytology or HGAIN. Conclusion: HGAIN is highly prevalent in HIV-infected men. Further studies are needed on treatment and prevention of HGAIN.

To reduce computational complexity, 2-D images of tumors are firstly preprocessed following our method to form two 1-D sequences, called horizontal and vertical landscapes, and then their fractal dimension is estimated using Higuchi’s fractal dimension. We validate application of this method for grading Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia (AIN) tumors using 120 images of histological slices graded by an experienced pathologist. The method is easy and quick and we demonstrate that it may be successfully applied for differentiation between AIN stages. It can easily be adapted to other histological specimen. Of course, like any other semiautomatic method it may support the pathologist’s decision.

Aims This paper presents a discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of redefining human papillomavirus-related anal intraepithelial neoplasia as a problem of sexually active people by using Kingdon's Multiple Streams Theory to examine possible policy solutions for increasing anal cancer screening. Background Human papillomavirus is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide. Anal cancer associated with human papillomavirus infections is increasing in incidence in both men and women. The prevalence of anal cancer does not decrease with age. Data source Pubmed was searched for articles and internet references from 1995–2012. Discussion Although a large body of literature suggests that human papillomavirus-related anal intraepithelial neoplasia is a problem, no effective policy solutions have emerged. However, as almost the entire sexually active population is exposed to human papillomavirus, it should be thought of as every person's problem. This suggests that human papillomavirus-related anal intraepithelial neoplasia calls for different types of problem definitions and policy solutions to address the disease. The issue of anal cancer is typically defined as a problem of HIV-positive individuals. Implications for Nursing Nurses are focused on improving patient outcomes. We play a key role in helping to identify problems, moving problems onto policymaker's agendas, and influencing the creation of new healthcare policies. Conclusion Human papillomavirus-related anal intraepithelial neoplasia demands attention and the development of national level policies to ensure public health and safety. Kingdon's Multiple Streams Theory has provided a pragmatic framework to evaluate the problem.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals have increased risk of anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Cytologic screening is invaluable in the detection of cervical neoplasia, therefore many clinicians have adopted anal cytology as part of anal cancer screening in patients at high-risk for anal neoplasia. The purpose of this study is to determine whether anal cytology is a valuable screening test for identifying AIN in HIV+ patients. The cohort included 228 HIV+ patients who underwent anal cancer screening with collection of 318 anal cytology specimens between January 2006 and December 2009. Of this group, 74 (32.5%) patients had associated anal biopsies within a 6-month period, with a total of 89 comparison cases. The anal cytology samples were classified using the 2001 Bethesda System terminology. The sensitivity of anal cytology in detecting ASC-US, AIN 1-3 or SCC was 93%. Cytology was 88% sensitive for detecting low-grade AIN (AIN 1), but only 20% sensitive for detecting high-grade AIN (AIN 2–3) or SCC. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cases were distributed evenly between low- and high-grade AIN, with two cases having normal histology. Only six cases had negative cytology, all of which were associated with AIN on biopsy, for a false negative rate of 7%. Anal cytology is a good predictor of AIN, as confirmed by the high degree of sensitivity. However, there is poor correlation between the cytological and histological grade of AIN. Cytology underestimates the grade of dysplasia compared to the corresponding biopsy. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:697–702. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background: Carcinogenesis caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) leads to over-expression of p16 protein. p16 may act as a marker of HPV integration with host genome and serve as a surrogate marker of HPV oncogenesis. Materials and Methods: A single center study of 75 women (35 HIV-positive and 40 HIV-negative women) was conducted. Anal and cervical specimens were obtained for cytology and p16 immunostaining. Results: The sensitivity of p16 to diagnose anal and cervical dysplasia was 50% and 58.8%, respectively, whereas specificity was 98.6% and 100%, respectively. Positive predictive value for anal and cervical was 75% and 100%, whereas negative predictive value was 95.8% and 89.2%, respectively. A strong relationship between the grade of dysplasia and intensity of p16 immunoscore was observed (Pearson correlation r = 0.666, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.496, P < 0.0001 for anal and cervical, respectively). Conclusion: p16 immunostaining with greater specificity for high-grade lesions may improve the diagnostic accuracy, especially for high-grade lesions which have a high risk of progression to malignancy and thereby necessitate treatment.