MARSON, FABIANO CARLOS, LOLLI, LUIS FERNANDO, PROGIANTE, PATRICIA SARAM, OLIVEIRA E. SILVA, CLEVERSON, LOPES PILOTO, RAFAEL, and DA ROCHA, ODALEIA OFELIA
The aim of this work was to establish a ratings showdown. Made by 3 distinct groups of volunteers at 10 patients aged between 20 and 30 years, 10 dentists general practitioners and 10 dentists specialists in aesthetics. Thus sought to highlight the importance of a work together patient-professional. 100 pictures of different types of smiles of patients seen in the master course in operative dentistry at the Ingá College and prosthesis were selected and organized into slides listed of 1 to 100. This sequence of slides was evaluated individually subjective manner by the volunteers in the Group of patients where 61% considered harmonics 39% no harmonics (being the cause: 35% teeth, 16% gums 28% lips, 17% two earlier and 4% all earlier), 66% female 34% male. The Group of general practitioners 56% harmonics 44% no harmonics were considered (being the cause: 19% teeth, 8% gums, 11% lips, 55%, previous two and 7% all earlier), 79% female 21% male. The Group of experts 42% of smiles were considered harmonics, 58% no harmonics (being the cause: 25% teehh 12% gums, 18% lips, 40%, previous two 5% all earlier), 88% female 12% male. With this we see the specialist with a higher capacity of critical evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]