1. The Future of Complementarity: Disentangling Causes from Consequences
- Author
-
Forest Isbell, Bernhard Schmid, Alexandra J. Wright, Alexandru Milcu, Christian Wirth, Alexandra Weigelt, Jasper van Ruijven, Gerlinde B. De Deyn, Christiane Roscher, Yongfei Bai, Kathryn E. Barry, Liesje Mommer, Hans de Kroon, John Connolly, Michael Scherer-Lorenzen, Department of Systematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Universität Leipzig [Leipzig], State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany [Beijing] (IB-CAS), Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS)-Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS), University College Dublin [Dublin] (UCD), Wageningen University and Research Centre [Wageningen] (WUR), Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota [Twin Cities], University of Minnesota System-University of Minnesota System, Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive (CEFE), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UM3), Écotron Européen de Montpellier - UPS 3248, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Faculty of Biology/Geobotany, Albert Ludwigs University, Institute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, Zurich University, Special Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR), University of Minnesota [Twin Cities] (UMN), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques (Montpellier SupAgro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier (Montpellier SupAgro), Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud]), Écotron Européen de Montpellier, University of Freiburg [Freiburg], University of Zurich, and Barry, Kathryn E
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Biotic feedbacks ,Evolution ,Biodiversity ,Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation ,Complementarity ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Feedback ,Behavior and Systematics ,Stress amelioration ,Economics ,Ecosystem ,Biomass ,Abiotic facilitation ,910 Geography & travel ,Resource tracers ,Resource partitioning ,Bodembiologie ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Abiotic component ,Plant–soil feedback ,Ecology ,Plant Ecology ,Soil Biology ,Complementarity effect ,15. Life on land ,PE&RC ,Complementarity (physics) ,10122 Institute of Geography ,1105 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,[SDE]Environmental Sciences ,Ecosystem functioning ,Plant-soil feedback ,Facilitation ,Plantenecologie en Natuurbeheer ,[SDE.BE]Environmental Sciences/Biodiversity and Ecology ,Monoculture ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
Evidence suggests that biodiversity supports ecosystem functioning. Yet, the mechanisms driving this relationship remain unclear. Complementarity is one common explanation for these positive biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. Yet, complementarity is often indirectly quantified as overperformance in mixture relative to monoculture (e.g., 'complementarity effect'). This overperformance is then attributed to the intuitive idea of complementarity or, more specifically, to species resource partitioning. Locally, however, several unassociated causes may drive this overperformance. Here, we differentiate complementarity into three types of species differences that may cause enhanced ecosystem functioning in more diverse ecosystems: (i) resource partitioning, (ii) abiotic facilitation, and (iii) biotic feedbacks. We argue that disentangling these three causes is crucial for predicting the response of ecosystems to future biodiversity loss.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF