Search

Clinical Practice Points • What is already known about this subject? • Resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in T790M positive NSCLC patients are multiple and heterogeneous, combining de novo EGFR alterations (C797S mutation), EGFR-independent mechanisms (MET and HER-2 amplifications) or histological transformations. • METex14 skipping alteration is an extremely rare resistance mechanism to osimertinib and can be explained either by drug selection of pre-existing minority subclones or by emergence of de novo molecular alteration. • In the rare patients who were resistant to osimertinib and who were tested for MET alteration, objective responses were reported after a combination of EGFR-TKI and crizotinib. • Liquid and tumor biopsies are rarely performed in routine practice after emergence of osimertinib resistance • What are the new findings and how might they impact on clinical practice in the foreseeable future? • We present the first case report demonstrating that crizotinib administrated alone can be effective long-term in this setting. • Repeating serial liquid biopsy, including pleural fluid, even in end-stage disease, may lead to detection of unexpected and targetable molecular findings, including MET alterations in cfDNA.

Benefit from maintenance in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) might favor switch maintenance after disease stabilization (SD) and continuation after objective response (OR). This trial assessed a maintenance strategy conditioned by response to cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) with G continuation for patients with OR or switch to pemetrexed (P) for patients with SD as compared with a control arm based on the Paramount regimen.Eligibility criteria: age 18-70 years, ECOG PS 0-1, untreated stage IV NS-NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alteration, ineligibility to bevacizumab. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either CG (4 cycles) followed by G maintenance in case of OR followed by P at progression, or switch to P for patients with SD, or 4 cycles of CP followed by P (control arm). Primary endpoint: overall Survival.Between 2012 and 2016, 932 patients were randomized (CG: 467, CP: 465) with well-balanced characteristics. 257 patients (56.7%) in the CG arm received maintenance (G: 142, P: 113) versus 277 patients (59.7%) in the CP arm. Median number of maintenance cycles was 5 for G and P (CG induction) and 4 for P (CP induction). OS adjusted HR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.84, 1.13; p = 0.71) with a median of 10.9 months (CG) versus 10.4 (CP). HR for PFS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.83, 1.09; p = 0.45) with a median of 4.8 months for CG versus 4.5 for CP. Safety profile was as expected.Adapting maintenance strategy according to response to induction chemotherapy does not improve patient outcome.NCT01631136.

Background Active endothelial cell proliferation occurs at the tumor edge, known as the invading-tumor front. This study focused on perfusion analysis of non-small cell lung cancers. Purpose To analyze dual-phase, dual-energy CT perfusion according to the degree of tumor hypoxia. Materials and Methods This prospective study was performed 2016-2017. A two-phase dual-energy CT protocol was obtained for consecutive participants with operable non-small cell lung cancer. The first pass and delayed iodine concentration within the tumor and normalized iodine uptake, corresponding to the iodine concentration within the tumor normalized to iodine concentration within the aorta, were calculated for the entire tumor and within three peripheral layers automatically segmented (ie, 2-mm-thick concentric subvolumes). The expression of the membranous carbonic anhydrase (mCA) IX, a marker of tumor hypoxia, was assessed in tumor specimens. Comparative analyses according to the histologic subtypes, type of resected tumors, and mCA IX expression were performed. Results There were 33 mCA IX-positive tumors and 16 mCA IX-negative tumors. In the entire tumor, the mean normalized iodine uptake was higher on delayed than on first-pass acquisitions (0.35 ± 0.17 vs 0.13 ± 0.15, respectively; P < .001). A single layer, located at the edge of the tumor, showed higher values of the iodine concentration (median, 0.53 mg/mL vs 0.21 mg/mL, respectively; P = .03) and normalized iodine uptake (0.04 vs 0.02, respectively; P = .03) at first pass in mCA IX-positive versus mCA IX-negative tumors. Within this layer, a functional profile of neovascularization was found in 23 of 33 (70%) of mCA IX-positive tumors, and the median mCA IX score of these tumors was higher than in tumors with a nonfunctional profile of neovascularization (median mCA IX score, 20 vs 2, respectively; P = .03). Conclusion A two-phase dual-energy CT examination depicted higher perfusion between the tumor edge and lung parenchyma in hypoxic tumors. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Murphy and Ryan in this issue.

Purpose:Double inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) using a tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus a monoclonal antibody may be a novel treatment strategy for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of afatinib + cetuximab versus afatinib alone in the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.Patients and Methods:In this phase II, randomized, open-label study, patients with stage III/IV EGFR-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive afatinib (group A) or afatinib + cetuximab (group A + C). Oral afatinib 40 mg was given once daily; cetuximab 250 mg/m² was administered intravenously on day 15 of cycle 1, then every 2 weeks at 500 mg/m² for 6 months. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) rate at 9 months. Exploratory analysis of EGFR circulating tumor DNA in plasma was performed.Results:Between June 2016 and November 2018, 59 patients were included in group A and 58 in group A + C. The study was ended early after a futility analysis was performed. The percentage of patients without treatment failure at 9 months was similar for both groups (59.3% for group A vs. 64.9% for group A + C), and median TTF was 11.1 (95% CI, 8.5–14.1) and 12.9 (9.2–14.5) months, respectively. Other endpoints, including progression-free survival and overall survival, also showed no improvement with the combination versus afatinib alone. There was a slight numerical increase in grade ≥3 adverse events in group A + C. Allele frequency of the EGFR gene mutation in circulating tumor DNA at baseline was associated with shorter PFS, regardless of the treatment received.Conclusions:These results suggest that addition of cetuximab to afatinib does not warrant further investigation in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Supplementary Tables

Purpose:Primary analysis of VISION showed tepotinib had durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We present updated outcomes for clinically relevant subgroups.Patients and Methods:This phase II, open-label, multi-cohort study of 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC assessed efficacy and safety in predefined subgroups according to age, prior therapies (chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors), and brain metastases. An ad hoc retrospective analysis using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) criteria assessed intracranial activity.Results:152 patients were evaluable for efficacy (median age: 73.1). Overall, objective response rate (ORR) was 44.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.7–53.0]. Patients aged n = 84) and ≥75 (n = 68) had ORRs of 48.8% (95% CI: 37.7–60.0) and 39.7% (95% CI: 28.0–52.3), respectively. Treatment-naïve (n = 69) versus previously treated (n = 83) patients showed consistent efficacy [ORR (95% CI): 44.9% (32.9–57.4) vs. 44.6% (33.7–55.9); median duration of response (95% CI): 10.8 (6.9–not estimable) vs. 11.1 (9.5–18.5) months]. Of 15 patients analyzed by RANO-BM (12 received prior radiotherapy), 13 achieved intracranial disease control; 5 of 7 patients with measurable brain metastases had partial intracranial responses. Of 255 patients evaluable for safety, 64 (25.1%) experienced grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), leading to discontinuation in 27 patients (10.6%). Rates of adverse events (AE) were broadly consistent irrespective of prior therapies.Conclusions:Tepotinib showed meaningful activity across subgroups by age, prior therapies, and brain metastases, with a manageable safety profile and few treatment discontinuations.See related commentary by Rosner and Spira, p. 1055

Supplementary Data from Tepotinib Efficacy and Safety in Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping NSCLC: Outcomes in Patient Subgroups from the VISION Study with Relevance for Clinical Practice

PDF file - 82K, PFR3 cells do not share the characteristics of "drug-tolerant cells"

PDF file - 64K, IGF1R and pIGFR1R levels are similar in the PFR3 and PFR3+, and WZR4 and WZR4+ cells

PDF file - 578K, PI3K inhibition restores sensitivity to PF299804 and WZ4002

PDF file - 158K, IGF1R inhibition alone does not effect growth of PFR or WZR cells

PDF file - 203K, Drug resistant PFR3+ and PFR5 cells exhibit loss of DUSP 6

PDF file - 80K

PDF file - 34K, PFR5 and PFR5+ cells grow in a similar fashion

PDF file - 415K, Effect of EGFR inhibitors (PF299804 or WZ4002) alone, BMS 53924 alone, CI-1040 alone or the combination of all 3 agents on cell signaling in the PFR3 + and WZR4 +

PDF file - 42K, IGFBP3 promoter methylation is present in the PFR3 and PFR5 cells

PDF file - 220k, OSI-906 restores sensitivity to PF299804 and WZ4002 in the PFR and WZR cells

International audience; No abstract available

BACKGROUND Prior IMMUNOTARGET registry data had suggested that responses to immune [anti PD(L)1] monotherapy in gene-arranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were rare or absent, depending on the specific oncogene. METHODS IMMUNOTARGET sites reporting prior registry data or new individual cases of gene rearranged NSCLC seeming to benefit from immune monotherapy were explored in detail looking to both validate their diagnosis of a functional gene rearrangement and to look for features potentially differentiating them from other such cases associated with low response rates. RESULTS Five cases of NSCLC with a gene rearrangement with reported responses or prolonged stabilization from immune monotherapy were identified in total. All had little or no prior smoking history and had programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) values ranging from zero to 100%. A confirmed rearrangement partner was reported in only 2 of the cases (CD74-ROS1 and KIF5B-RET), however in one of the other three cases [analplastic lymophoma kinase (ALK)], significant benefit from a relevant prior targeted therapy was noted, also consistent with the rearrangement status being correctly assigned. CONCLUSIONS Not all driver oncogene subtypes of NSCLC are equally responsive to immune monotherapy, however even among patients with well-validated gene rearranged NSCLC which has traditionally been considered immune hyporesponsive, objective responses can occur. Additional explorations of the features associated with and underlying the immune hypo-responsiveness of most, but not all, cases of gene-rearranged NSCLC are required.

Following the American National Lung Screening Trial results in 2011 a consortium of French experts met to edit a statement. Recent results of other randomized trials gave the opportunity for our group to meet again in order to edit updated guidelines. After literature review, we provide here a new update on lung cancer screening in France. Notably, in accordance with all international guidelines, the experts renew their recommendation in favor of individual screening for lung cancer in France as per the conditions laid out in this document. In addition, the experts recommend the very rapid organization and funding of prospective studies, which, if conclusive, will enable the deployment of lung cancer screening organized at the national level.

Edema; Nausea; Non-small cell lung cancer Edema; Náuseas; Cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas Edema; Nàusees; Càncer de pulmó de cèl·lules no petites Introduction The MET inhibitor tepotinib demonstrated durable clinical activity in patients with advanced MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping NSCLC. We report detailed analyses of adverse events of clinical interest (AECIs) in VISION, including edema, a class effect of MET inhibitors. Patients and Methods Incidence, management, and time to first onset/resolution were analyzed for all-cause AECIs, according to composite categories (edema, hypoalbuminemia, creatinine increase, and ALT/AST increase) or individual preferred terms (pleural effusion, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting), for patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC in the phase II VISION trial. Results Of 255 patients analyzed (median age: 72 years), edema, the most common AECI, was reported in 69.8% (grade 3, 9.4%; grade 4, 0%). Median time to first edema onset was 7.9 weeks (range: 0.1-58.3). Edema was manageable with supportive measures, dose reduction (18.8%), and/or treatment interruption (23.1%), and rarely prompted discontinuation (4.3%). Other AECIs were also manageable and predominantly mild/moderate: hypoalbuminemia, 23.9% (grade 3, 5.5%); pleural effusion, 13.3% (grade ≥ 3, 5.1%); creatinine increase, 25.9% (grade 3, 0.4%); nausea, 26.7% (grade 3, 0.8%), diarrhea, 26.3% (grade 3, 0.4%), vomiting 12.9% (grade 3, 1.2%), and ALT/AST increase, 12.2% (grade ≥ 3, 3.1%). GI AEs typically occurred early and resolved in the first weeks. Conclusion Tepotinib was well tolerated in the largest trial of a MET inhibitor in METex14 skipping NSCLC. The most frequent AEs were largely mild/moderate and manageable with supportive measures and/or dose reduction/interruption, and caused few withdrawals in this elderly population.

Objective Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have become a major treatment in advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, some patients do not benefit from ICI, especially those harboring an ALK rearrangement. Here, we report a case of prolonged complete tumor response to immunotherapy in an ALK-rearranged NSCLC patient. Materials and Methods We verify ALK expression and rearrangement on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples of the patient by Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization analysis. The patient provided written informed consent authorizing publication of clinical case. Results We report the case of 48 years old man with a ALK-rearranged NSCLC. This patient displayed a complete response for 16 months under nivolumab therapy in third line setting after ceritinib and platin based chemotherapy. Conclusion This is the first case of complete and prolonged response to ICI in ALK rearranged NSCLC. This case supports the idea that some ALK rearranged NSCLC could durably benefit from immunotherapy.

Objectives Efficacy and safety of necitumumab when combined with pembrolizumab was assessed in patients with Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) of squamous and nonsquamous histology, who had progressed after treatment with a platinum-based doublet. Materials and methods This single-arm, multicenter, phase Ib study had a dose-finding phase, in which escalating doses of necitumumab (600 mg and 800 mg IV) were administered on Day 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (Q3W) in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg IV) on Day 1 Q3W, and expansion cohorts. Patients were treated until progressive disease (PD), toxicity requiring cessation, protocol noncompliance, or withdrawal of consent. Efficacy was evaluated by overall response rate (ORR). Results In 64 treated patients (32 patients [50 %] were programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] negative), confirmed ORR was 23.4 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 13.8 %–35.7 %). Two patients (3.1 %) had complete response (CR), 13 patients (20.3 %) had partial response (PR), 26 patients (40.6 %) had stable disease, 17 patients (26.6 %) had PD, and 6 patients (9.4 %) were not evaluable. Regardless of histology or PD-L1 status, median PFS (mPFS) was 4.1 months (95 % CI 2.4–6.9 months) and OS at 6 months was 74.7 % (61.5%–83.9%). Confirmed disease control rate was 64.1 % (95 % CI 51.5–75.7). Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ≥1% had numerically improved ORR and median progression-free survival when compared with patients with PD-L1 negative cancer. No dose-limiting toxicities were recorded and the combination of necitumumab 800 mg with pembrolizumab 200 mg was considered tolerable. Conclusion Results suggest modest benefits of second-line necitumumab and pembrolizumab combination therapy in patients with Stage IV NSCLC. Safety profiles were consistent with class effects typical of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and immunotherapies with no additive toxicities.

PURPOSE HER2 exon 20 insertions and point mutations are oncogenic drivers found in 1%-2% of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). No targeted therapy is approved for this subset of patients. We prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of the combination of two antibodies against human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2 [HER2] trastuzumab and pertuzumab with docetaxel; trastuzumab and pertuzumab) and docetaxel. METHODS The IFCT 1703-R2D2 trial is a multicenter, nonrandomized phase II study. Patients with HER2-mutated, advanced NSCLC who progressed after ≥ 1 platinum-based treatment were enrolled. Patients received pertuzumab at a loading dose of 840 mg and 420 mg thereafter; trastuzumab at an 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR). Other end points included the duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety ( NCT03845270 ). RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled and treated. The median age was 64.5 years (range, 31-84 years), 35% were smokers, 72% were females, 15% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, and 30% had brain metastases. The objective response rate was 29% (n = 13), and 58% had stable disease (n = 26). The median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 8.5). The median duration of response in patients with a confirmed response (n = 13) was 11 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 14.9). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 64% of the patients. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (33%), diarrhea (13%), and anemia (9%). CONCLUSION Triple therapy with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel is feasible and effective for HER2-mutated pretreated advanced NSCLC. These results highlight the effectiveness of the HER2 antibody-based strategy, which should be considered for these patients.

Purpose: Double inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) using a tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus a monoclonal antibody may be a novel treatment strategy for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed the efficacy and toxicity of afatinib + cetuximab versus afatinib alone in the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Patients and Methods: In this phase II, randomized, open-label study, patients with stage III/IV EGFR-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive afatinib (group A) or afatinib + cetuximab (group A + C). Oral afatinib 40 mg was given once daily; cetuximab 250 mg/m² was administered intravenously on day 15 of cycle 1, then every 2 weeks at 500 mg/m² for 6 months. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) rate at 9 months. Exploratory analysis of EGFR circulating tumor DNA in plasma was performed. Results: Between June 2016 and November 2018, 59 patients were included in group A and 58 in group A + C. The study was ended early after a futility analysis was performed. The percentage of patients without treatment failure at 9 months was similar for both groups (59.3% for group A vs. 64.9% for group A + C), and median TTF was 11.1 (95% CI, 8.5–14.1) and 12.9 (9.2–14.5) months, respectively. Other endpoints, including progression-free survival and overall survival, also showed no improvement with the combination versus afatinib alone. There was a slight numerical increase in grade ≥3 adverse events in group A + C. Allele frequency of the EGFR gene mutation in circulating tumor DNA at baseline was associated with shorter PFS, regardless of the treatment received. Conclusions: These results suggest that addition of cetuximab to afatinib does not warrant further investigation in treatment-naïve advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a rare subset of lung cancer, with specific presentation, and multiple treatment options, including selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Real-world evidence is insufficient regarding the actual real-life treatment sequences in the late line setting, and available clinical trials may not reflect real-world situation. Here, we took advantage of the French Expanded Access Program (EAP) of lorlatinib, a third-generation TKI targeting ALK and ROS1, to assess treatment sequencing, and lorlatinib efficacy and safety, in patients with ALK+ NSCLC.All consecutive patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC treated between October 2015 and June 2019 with lorlatinib as part of EAP were included. Data were collected and reviewed from medical records by independent research staff of the French Thoracic Cancer Intergroup. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).Of the 208 patients included, 117 (56%) were female, 142 (69%) were never smokers, and 180 (87%) had stage IV NSCLC at diagnosis. The most frequent histology was adenocarcinoma (94%), and the median age was 60.9 years. At the time of lorlatinib initiation, 160 (77%) patients had brain metastases, and 125 (72%) were performance status 0/1. Lorlatinib was delivered as 2nd/3rd/4th/5th+ line in 4%/17%/30%/49% of patients. A total of 162 (78%) patients had previously been treated with chemotherapy, 194 (93%) with a first-generation ALK-TKI, 195 (94%) with a second-generation ALK-TKI. The median follow-up from lorlatinib initiation was 23.3 months. The median PFS, median overall survival (OS) from lorlatinib initiation and median OS from advanced NSCLC diagnosis were 9.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 6-12.3 months), 32.9 months (95% CI 18.7 months to not reached) and 97.3 months (95% CI 75.7-152.8 months), respectively. The median duration of treatment with lorlatinib was 11.8 months (95% CI 8.5-18.8 months). Overall response and disease control rate were 49% and 86%, respectively. Central nervous system objective response rate was 56%. Treatment was stopped due to toxicity in 28 patients (14%). The safety profile of lorlatinib was consistent with previously published data.Real-world evidence indicates that lorlatinib offers a significant clinical benefit and high intracerebral antitumour activity in heavily pretreated patients with ALK+ NSCLC.NCT03727477.

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common liver cancer after hepatocellular carcinoma. In case of metastatic or unresectable disease, the recommended first-line treatment is gemcitabine-based doublet, most commonly gemcitabine and cisplatin. There is no standard treatment for further lines. MET fusions are rare alterations described in many cancers. The efficacy of specific MET inhibitors is poorly studied. We present the case of a patient with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring a CAPZA-2-MET fusion along with MET amplification who dramatically responded to capmatinib, a specific MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

Background The assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has seen exponential growth in oncology clinical trials. However, the measurement of HRQoL has yet to be optimised in routine clinical practice. This study aimed at exploring the operationalisation of HRQoL in clinical practice with the goal of reaching a consensus from a panel of physicians. Materials and methods Physicians involved in the management of lung cancer patients in France were recruited to participate in a Delphi study. The study involved three rounds of iterated queries to gain consensus on management aspects of HRQoL, including timing of discussion on HRQoL, which specific domains of HRQoL should be discussed, and what was the most appropriate method of assessment. The threshold adopted for consensus was at least 70% agreement among physicians. A scientific committee reviewed results following each round of the Delphi study. Results A representative panel of 60 physicians participated in this study. Consensus was obtained for HRQoL management at all time points in the patient care pathway. Panellists agreed that HRQoL discussions should occur during routine visits and hospitalisation. The involvement of patients' relatives was also recognised as important, except when discussing side-effects and involvement of a multidisciplinary team. There was a lack of consensus on a systematic assessment for all patients at each visit and no consensus on how HRQoL should be measured in clinical practice. Conclusions HRQoL discussions are considered an integral part in the management of lung cancer patients, and are deemed key to success in patient–physician interaction. Further research is required to harmonise how best to implement HRQoL assessment., Highlights • HRQoL was considered part of routine clinical visits in thoracic oncology by French physicians. • HRQoL was deemed key in the patient–physician interaction during the patient care pathway. • The implementation of the quality-of-life assessment is not yet in place, and the tools to assess it are not yet identified. • Further work should be conducted to harmonise how to best implement and use quality-of-life assessment in routine practice.

Contains fulltext : 215810.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) BACKGROUND: Anti-PD1/PD-L1 directed immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are widely used to treat patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The activity of ICI across NSCLC harboring oncogenic alterations is poorly characterized. The aim of our study was to address the efficacy of ICI in the context of oncogenic addiction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study for patients receiving ICI monotherapy for advanced NSCLC with at least one oncogenic driver alteration. Anonymized data were evaluated for clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes for ICI therapy: best response (RECIST 1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) from ICI initiation. The primary end point was PFS under ICI. Secondary end points were best response (RECIST 1.1) and OS from ICI initiation. RESULTS: We studied 551 patients treated in 24 centers from 10 countries. The molecular alterations involved KRAS (n = 271), EGFR (n = 125), BRAF (n = 43), MET (n = 36), HER2 (n = 29), ALK (n = 23), RET (n = 16), ROS1 (n = 7), and multiple drivers (n = 1). Median age was 60 years, gender ratio was 1 : 1, never/former/current smokers were 28%/51%/21%, respectively, and the majority of tumors were adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate by driver alteration was: KRAS = 26%, BRAF = 24%, ROS1 = 17%, MET = 16%, EGFR = 12%, HER2 = 7%, RET = 6%, and ALK = 0%. In the entire cohort, median PFS was 2.8 months, OS 13.3 months, and the best response rate 19%. In a subgroup analysis, median PFS (in months) was 2.1 for EGFR, 3.2 for KRAS, 2.5 for ALK, 3.1 for BRAF, 2.5 for HER2, 2.1 for RET, and 3.4 for MET. In certain subgroups, PFS was positively associated with PD-L1 expression (KRAS, EGFR) and with smoking status (BRAF, HER2). CONCLUSIONS: : ICI induced regression in some tumors with actionable driver alterations, but clinical activity was lower compared with the KRAS group and the lack of response in the ALK group was notable. Patients with actionable tumor alterations should receive targeted therapies and chemotherapy before considering immunotherapy as a single agent.

Resume Les criteres d’evaluation radiologique de la reponse aux traitements anticancereux ont ete etablis pour harmoniser l’interpretation et les pratiques. Ces criteres ont ete initialement proposes pour l’evaluation de la reponse a la chimiotherapie cytotoxique. L’immunotherapie fonctionne selon un mecanisme d’action singulier qui ne repose pas sur un effet directement cytotoxique mais sur un afflux de cellules immunitaires au sein de la tumeur. De ce fait, l’immunotherapie induit des profils de reponse radiologique atypiques, incluant notamment les pseudoprogressions et les hyperprogressions. Par consequent, des criteres specifiques d’evaluation de la reponse a l’immunotherapie ont ete developpes, en particulier les criteres iRECIST. Cette synthese detaille ces criteres et en discute les avantages et les limites. © 2019 SPLF. Publie par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.

Resume La decouverte des alterations moleculaires a l’origine du processus cancereux a permis le developpement de therapies dites ciblees, majoritairement representees par les inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinase . Malgre une efficacite initiale, ces traitements sont systematiquement confrontes a l’emergence de mecanismes de resistance a l’origine d’un echappement tumoral. La comprehension croissante de la biologie des cancers pulmonaires a permis de concevoir de nouveaux inhibiteurs capables de surmonter une partie de ces mecanismes de resistance. Cette revue revient sur les concepts d’addiction oncogenique et de resistance aux therapies ciblees. Elle detaille egalement les principales alterations moleculaires a l’origine de ces phenomenes dans les cancers pulmonaires.

Resume Les mutations de l’EGFR restent aujourd’hui le mecanisme de dependance le plus frequemment observe au cours des cancers bronchiques non a petites cellules (CBNPC) etendus, representant 12 % des adenocarcinomes et 44 % des CBNPC des non-fumeurs, en France. Les mutations « communes » de l’EGFR – deletions de l’exon 19 et mutation L858R de l’exon 21, sont observees dans 89 % des cas. L’utilisation des nouvelles techniques de biologie moleculaire nous confronte a l’identification de mutations « rares » de l’EGFR, mais aussi a la constatation d’une heterogeneite moleculaire au diagnostic et durant le suivi. Cette heterogeneite d’une part, explique en partie les variations d’efficacite observees des inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinase de l’EGFR (ITK-EGFR) et d’autre part, conduit a l’emergence de clones resistants qui orientent le traitement (T790M) lors de la progression tumorale. Jusqu’a recemment, les strategies therapeutiques de 1re et de 2e ligne etaient bien etablies, mais ont ete bouleversees par l’arrivee de l’osimertinib en 2e, puis en 1re ligne. En l’absence de donnees sur l’impact sur la survie globale de l’osimertinib et sur les mecanismes de resistances secondaires, il est important de mettre a jour nos connaissances concernant les nouvelles molecules, mais aussi les strategies de traitements deja disponibles. © 2019 SPLF. Publie par Elsevier Masson SAS. Tous droits reserves.

Resume L’avenement de l’immunotherapie comme pierre angulaire du traitement de 1re ligne des cancers bronchiques non a petites cellules avances conduit a modifier l’algorithme therapeutique de 2e ligne, initialement fonde sur l’utilisation des anti-PD(L)-1 en monotherapie. Le traitement de seconde ligne est actuellement represente par un doublet a base de sels de platine chez les patients ayant recu en 1re ligne du pembrolizumab en monotherapie et pour les patients traites par une association chimiotherapie-immunotherapie, par les options traditionnelles de chimiotherapie de seconde ligne, le docetaxel quelle que soit l’histologie ou le pemetrexed pour les carcinomes non epidermoides si non utilise en 1re ligne. L’addition d’un traitement anti-angiogenique au docetaxel ameliore modestement la survie des patients mais le nintedanib et le ramucirumab ne sont pas disponibles en France. L’avenir du traitement de 2e ligne necessitera une meilleure connaissance des mecanismes de resistance aux anti-PD(L)-1 afin de rationaliser des associations therapeutiques destinees a restaurer la reponse immunitaire anti-tumorale.

International audience; Objectives The efficacy of osimertinib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR T790 M resistance mutation was demonstrated in clinical trials. However, data on efficacy of osimertinib in real world remain rare. Materials and methods This retrospective multicentric study analyzed T790M-positive advanced NSCLC patients enrolled in French early access program for osimertinib. Patients were pretreated with first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and for a majority with chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from osimertinib initiation. Results 205 patients (mean age, 69.5 years; female, 68.8%; adenocarcinoma, 97.5%, never-smokers, 71.5%) were analyzed. Osimertinib was used in second and third line in 18.0% and 82.0% of patients, respectively. Median PFS was 12.4 (95% CI, 10.1-15.1) months. In patients with and without cerebral metastasis, PFS was 9.7 (7.7-13.5) and 15.1 (12.0-17.1) months (p = 0.21), respectively. PFS in second and third line or more was 12.6 (6.7-17.5) and 12.4 (9.7-15.3) months, respectively. Median PFS in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion and exon 21 mutation was 13.5 (10.1-16.0) and 9.7 (7.4-13.2) months, respectively (p = 0.049). Median OS since osimertinib initiation was 20.5 (16.9-24.3) months: 23.1 (18.6-27.8) and 18.0 (12.2-22.2) months in patients without and with cerebral metastasis (p = 0.11); 17.5 (11.6-27.8) and 21.7 (17.3-24.3) months as second or third line of treatment or more (p = 0.46), respectively. Median OS in patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion and exon 21 mutation was 23.1 (18.6-25.7) and 15.3 (11.6-21.7) months, respectively (p = 0.03). Osimertinib dosage was modified in 8.0% of patients and definitively discontinued for adverse events in 5.9%. Fifty patients benefited from rebiopsy (persistence of T790 M mutation, 44.7%; C797S mutation, 21.1%; cMET amplification, 8.0%). Conclusion In pretreated patients with T790M-mutated advanced NSCLC, the efficacy of osimertinib appears similar in real-world setting to that of clinical trials.

Although targeted therapies have increased the life expectancy of patients with druggable molecular alterations directly involved in tumor development, the efficacy of these therapies is limited by acquired resistances leading to treatment failure. Most targeted therapies, including ones exploiting therapeutic antibodies and kinase inhibitors, are directed against receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) or major signaling hubs. Resistances to these therapies arise when inhibition of these targets is bypassed through activation of alternative signaling pathways. In recent years, activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase MET has been shown to promote resistance to various targeted therapies. This casts MET as important actor in resistance. In this review, we describe how the MET receptor triggers resistance to targeted therapies against RTKs such as EGFR, VEGFR, and HER2 and against signaling hubs such as BRAF. We also describe how MET can be its own resistance factor, as illustrated by on-target resistance of lung tumors harboring activating mutations causing MET exon 14 skipping. Interestingly, investigation of all these situations reveals functional physiological relationships between MET and the target of the therapy to which the cancer becomes resistant, suggesting that resistance stems from preexisting mechanisms. Identification of MET as a resistance factor opens the way to co-treatment strategies that are being tested in current clinical trials.

Introduction: In the primary analysis of VISION, tepotinib — a highly selective, potent MET inhibitor — demonstrated durable efficacy, and a tolerable safety profile in patients (pts) with METex14 skipping NSCLC. We report updated outcomes, with interim analyses from a confirmatory cohort. Methods: In the Phase II VISION study, pts with advanced/metastatic METex14 skipping NSCLC, identified by liquid (L+) and/or tissue (T+) biopsy, received 500 mg (450 mg active moiety) tepotinib once daily. All pts were assessed for safety; pts with ≥3 months’ follow-up were assessed for efficacy. Primary endpoint was objective response by independent review (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints were disease control (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: As of Feb 1, 2021, 7,882 pts were pre-screened, and 275 pts were analyzed for efficacy. Patients analyzed for efficacy had a median age of 72.4 years (range, 41-94]), 50.9% were female, 46.5% had smoking history, and median tumor load [target lesions by IRC] was 57.4 mm [range, 10.2-227.8]). Tumor load in L+ pts was 68.0 mm (11.6-227.8) and 52.9 mm (10.2-227.8) in T+ pts. In treatment-naïve pts (n=137), ORR was 54.0% (95% CI: 45.3, 62.6), DCR was 74.5% (66.3, 81.5), and >90% of pts had tumor shrinkage. Median (m) DOR was 32.7 months (9.0, not estimable), mPFS was 10.4 months (8.4, 15.3), and mOS was 17.6 months (13.4, 29.7). In previously treated pts (n=138), ORR was 44.2% (35.8, 52.9), DCR was 75.4% (67.3, 82.3), and >90% of pts had tumor shrinkage. mDOR was 11.1 months (8.4, 18.5), mPFS was 11.0 months (8.2, 12.4), and mOS was 19.9 months (15.8, 22.3). Meaningful clinical activity was observed in L+ and T+ pts (Table). Overall, 14.1% of pts discontinued due to TRAEs; tepotinib was well-tolerated across treatment lines (Table). Conclusions: Tepotinib demonstrated robust and durable clinical activity across treatment lines in pts with METex14 skipping NSCLC, with particularly durable efficacy in first line. TRAEs were manageable with few discontinuations. Table 1. Tepotinib efficacy and safety in patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC (VISION) Tepotinib efficacy (pts with ≥3 months’ follow-up in Cohorts A+C) Overall Treatment-naϊve (n=137) Previously treated (n=138) Combined (N=275) Liquid biopsy* (n=81) Tissue biopsy* (n=86) Liquid biopsy* (n=78) Tissue biopsy* (n=88) Objective response rate, % (95% CI) 49.1 (43.0, 55.2) 54.3 (42.9, 65.4) 54.7 (43.5, 65.4) 43.6 (32.4, 55.3) 47.7 (37.0, 58.6) Disease control rate, % (95% CI) 74.9 (69.4, 79.9) 71.6 (60.5, 81.1) 80.2 (70.2, 88.0) 69.2 (57.8, 79.2) 79.5 (69.6, 87.4) Median duration of response, months (95% CI) 13.8 (9.9, 19.4) 13.8 (7.2, ne) 32.7 (10.8, 32.7) 11.1 (8.4, 19.4) 10.1 (8.3, 15.7) Median progression-free survival, months (95% CI) 10.8 (8.5, 12.4) 8.5 (6.9, 11.3) 15.3 (9.6, ne) 8.3 (5.7, 11.0) 11.1 (8.2, 16.8) Median overall survival, months (95% CI) 19.7 (15.6, 22.1) 15.1 (9.5, 22.1) 29.7 (15.3, ne) 19.9 (12.8, 22.3) 22.3 (17.0, 27.2) Tepotinib safety (all pts who received tepotinib in Cohorts A+C) Overall (N=291) Treatment-naϊve (n=148) Previously treated (n=143) Treatment-related AEs†, n (%) Any grade 264 (90.7) 137 (92.6) 127 (88.8) Grade ≥3 86 (29.6) 49 (33.1) 37 (25.9) Leading to death 2 (0.7) 1 (0.7) 1 (0.7) Leading to a dose reduction 90 (30.9) 51 (34.5) 39 (27.3) Leading to temporary discontinuation 114 (39.2) 63 (42.6) 51 (35.7) Leading to permanent discontinuation 41 (14.1) 24 (16.2) 17 (11.9) All-cause AEs† in ≥20% of patients, n (%) Peripheral edema 191 (65.6) 98 (66.2) 93 (65.0) Nausea 88 (30.2) 51 (34.5) 37 (25.9) Diarrhea 81 (27.8) 42 (28.4) 39 (27.3) Hypoalbuminemia 81 (27.8) 41 (27.7) 40 (28.0) Blood creatinine increase 76 (26.1) 34 (23.0) 42 (29.4) Dyspnea 60 (20.6) 40 (27.0) 20 (14.0) Data cut-off: Feb 1, 2021. *Patients with METex14 skipping detected by both liquid and tissue biopsy are included in both analysis sets (overall, n=59; treatment-naïve, n=30; previously treated, n=29); testing by both methods was not required for enrollment. †AEs were defined as events that started within the day of first dose of trial treatment until 30 days after last dose of treatment or started prior to first dose but worsened during the treatment period. AEs were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; MET, mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor; METex14; MET exon 14; ne, not estimable. Citation Format: Marina C. Garassino, Xiuning Le, Wade T. Iam, Enriqueta Felip, Hiroshi Sakai, Remi Veillon, Egbert F. Smit, Julien Mazieres, Jo Raskin, Alexis B. Cortot, Karin Berghoff, Rolf Bruns, Gordon Otto, Paul K. Paik. Tepotinib efficacy and safety in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping NSCLC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT536.

e21014 Background: Although mutations in the kinase domain of MET are well described in papillary renal cell carcinoma, they are rare and poorly studied in lung cancer, but could constitute a new therapeutic target given the availability of potent MET inhibitors. The characteristics of patients with MET kinase mutation in lung cancer are still unknown. Our objective was to describe the demographic, clinical and biological characteristics of these patients, and analyze their survival. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including patients with lung cancer harboring a MET kinase mutation. Patients who had already received treatment with a MET TKI before the MET kinase mutation was found were excluded. Results: We identified 37 patients with a MET kinase mutation. Among them, 2 had already received a MET inhibitor and in 8 cases, the data were not accessible. A total of 27 patients were included in the final analysis, including 17 males (63%) and only 2 (8%) never smokers. The median age was 64 (range 43-86). Most patients had adenocarcinoma (n = 25, 93%). 19 patients were diagnosed at an advanced stage. The main metastatic sites were brain (n = 8, 42%), bones (n = 7, 37%) and lungs (n = 5, 19%). PDL1 expression level was available for 21 patients, and was < 1%, 1-49% and ≥50% in 4 (19%), 5 (24%) and 12 (57%) patients respectively. MET kinase mutations involved exon 15, 16, 17, 18 or 19 in 6 (22%), 7 (26%), 7 (26%), 3 (11%) and 4 (15%) patients respectively. The 2 most common mutations were H1112Y (4 patients) and H1097R (3 patients). 18 patients (67%) had a concurrent alteration by NGS including TP53 mutations (n = 11, 41%), KRAS mutations (n = 6, 22%) and NRAS mutations (n = 3, 11%). Overall, co-alterations involving known driver oncogenes were detected in 13 patients (48%). 19 patients received a first-line systemic treatment for advanced disease. Median progression-free survival with chemotherapy and immunotherapy was 10.5 and 6.4 months, respectively (p = 0.55). Median overall survival was 12.2 months. No patient received a MET inhibitor. Conclusions: MET kinase mutations are not associated with specific clinical characteristics and frequently occur together with other oncogene mutations. These results suggest that these mutations may not be sufficient to drive carcinogenesis by themselves.

9082 Background: BRAF V600E mutations occur up to 2% of advanced non-small cell lung (NSCLC). Dabrafenib-trametinib (D-T) combination was associated with improved OS rates in phase II study and was approved in the 1st-line setting and further. The IFCT-2004 BLaDE study reports the D-T combination efficacy in a large French real-world multicenter cohort of advanced BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLC. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC harboring BRAF V600E mutation diagnosed between 01.01.2016 and 31.12.2019 and treated with D-T combination (D 300 mg + T 2 mg daily) whatever the treatment line were included. Demographic, clinical, pathological data were collected as well as data of efficacy and reason of treatment discontinuation. The primary endpoint was 12 months-OS rate in pts receiving the D-T as 2nd-line or subsequent treatment (L2+). Results: 163 pts were included in 54 centers through 32 national testing labs: 50.3 % were female, 30.2% never-smokers, 95.1 % had adenocarcinoma and PDL1 was > 1% in 78.2%. Median age was 68.3 years. At D-T initiation, 80.8 % of pts were PS 0/1, 93.9 % were stage IIIB/C ineligible for surgery or local therapy and IV, 20.9% had brain metastases and 27% received D+T as 1st line treatment (L1). At the data cutoff (30.06.2021), median (m) follow-up was 27.4 months [95% CI 22.2-31.9] and 47 pts (28.8%) remained on study treatment. 12 months-OS rate in pts receiving D+T in L2+ (n = 119) was 67.4% [95% CI 57.8-75.3] with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 10.4 months [95% CI 7.3-13.1]. In the 44 pts receiving D+T in L1, 12 months-OS rate was also 67.4% [95% CI 51.2-79.3] with a mPFS of 18.2 months [95% CI 7.7-21.3]. Objective response rates were 73.8% [95% CI 65.5 - 82.2] and 82.9% [95% CI 71.4 - 94.4], disease progression was observed as best response in 3.7% [95% CI 0.1 - 7.3] and 0% in L2+ and L1, respectively. Other efficacy results are detailed in the table. D-T discontinuation for toxicity was reported in 10.3% of pts. 51.2% and 43.7% of pts received subsequent treatment in L2+ and L1 respectively. For L2+ pts, subsequent treatments were immunotherapy (IO)-based in 37.2 % and chemotherapy in 58.3%. For L1 pts, subsequent treatments were (IO)-based in 42.9% and chemotherapy in 42.7%. Conclusions: Our series confirms significant efficacy of D-T combination in BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic NSCLC. These results in real-world conditions are consistent with registration studies but also support its use in 1st line setting. [Table: see text]