Search

Background: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens has been shown to significantly improve outcomes in patients with triple negative breast cancer and is being investigated for high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Preclinical evidence suggests radiation therapy (RT) can stimulate intra-tumoral T cell infiltration and enhance the expression and immune detection of tumor-specific neoantigens. This phase II pilot randomized study (NCT04443348) aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different doses of preoperative primary tumor RT boost when combined with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, then followed by standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Dual co-primary endpoints include determining the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the non-irradiated and pathologically confirmed metastatic axillary lymph node(s) in each treatment arm and quantifying tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes in on-treatment (C1D14) tumor biopsies. We hypothesize that high-dose RT will increase the proportion of tumors with high T cell infiltration (i.e., top quartile) from 25% to 55%. Secondary endpoints include measuring residual cancer burden, evaluating tolerability of the regimen, and assessing quality of life. Exploratory endpoints include evaluation of treatment-associated changes in the tumor immune microenvironment, circulating immune cell analyses, and circulating tumor DNA kinetics. Methods: The study plans to enroll 128 participants with either triple negative (n=80) or high-risk HR=/HER2- (n=48) breast cancer who will be randomized to receive no, low (9 Gy), or high (24 Gy) dose of preoperative RT boost, after which 24 participants of either breast cancer subtype will be enrolled to an exploratory high dose proton therapy boost cohort. The eligibility criteria include patients who have biopsy-proven, axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer that is either triple negative (defined as ER< 10%, PR< 10%, and HER2-negative) or high-risk HR+/HER2- (grade III or having a high-risk genomic assay score). Study treatment is given in 6-week cycles, with 400 mg Pembrolizumab given on day 1 of each cycle. For those participants randomized to receive a preoperative RT boost, treatment is delivered in 3 fractions (3 × 3 Gy or 3 × 8 Gy) over consecutive business days, where one of the fractions is given on the same day as C1D1 Pembrolizumab. Standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy begins on C1D15 with paclitaxel (plus carboplatin for triple negative) administered weekly for 12 weeks, and then starting on C3D15, dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide is administered every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Following neoadjuvant treatment, participants will receive standard breast surgery (including removal of the pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph node) followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab, radiation therapy, and standard-of-care systemic therapy as clinically indicated. Tissue samples from the primary tumor and biopsy-proven lymph node are taken at baseline, C1D14, and at the time of surgery. There are eleven blood collection timepoints throughout the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Participants will be followed for 2 years after surgery to assess safety and durability of responses. Results: This study has accrued 12 participants to date, including 10 with triple negative breast cancer and 2 with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Formal results for this study are forthcoming, as the trial is actively accruing at 6 institutions, with plans to open at 3 more within the year. For persons with a specific interest in this trial, please contact Joseph Connolly, Multi-Center Coordinator, at jconnolly28@mgh.harvard.edu. Citation Format: Joseph J. Connolly, Laura M. Spring, Alphonse G. Taghian, Michele Gadd, Laura Warren, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Tari King, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Jose P. Leone, Dana L. Casey, Lisa Carey, Tiffany A. Traina, Yara Abdou, Atif Khan, George Plitas, Jean Wright, Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria, Lisa Jacobs, Rachel Blitzblau, E Shelley Hwang, Carey Anders, Ian Krop, Antonio C. Wolff, Alastair M. Thompson, Elyssa Denault, Gaorav Gupta, Alice Ho. TBCRC-053: P-RAD: A Randomized Study of Preoperative Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab and No, Low or High Dose RADiation in Node-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-15-01.

Background: We previously demonstrated that intrinsic subtypes were associated with prognosis for early recurrence risk in patients (pts) with early-stage HER2-positive (HER2+) BC treated with trastuzumab (H) in the N9831 trial. Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of Intrinsic subtypes and 21-gene assay and the risk of early and late recurrence in the N9831 trial. Methods: NanoString custom code set, which included PAM50 and housekeeping genes, was used to quantify mRNA and generated intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR) score from the N9831 trial in Arms A and C: Arm A chemotherapy alone and arm C concurrent H. Quantitative RT-PCR of 21 genes, calculation of the axis, including estrogen axis (ER, PGR, BCL2, SCUBE2), HER2 axis (GRB7, HER2), proliferation axis (Ki67, STK15, Survivin, CCNB1, MYBL2), invasion axis (MMP11, CTSL2), and recurrence score (RS) risk group assignment (RS group 1 and 2: RS < 31 and RS group 3: RS ≥ 31) were performed using Oncotype DX assay. Cox regression models for RFS were used for analysis. Early recurrence was defined as a recurrence that occurred at ≤ 5 years, and late recurrence was defined as recurrence at > 5 years. Results: A total of 783 patients (Arm A 409 and Arm C 374) were included in this analysis. Using multivariate Cox regression analysis to evaluate the risk of early recurrence in patients who received chemotherapy alone in arm A, both invasion genes (MMP11 HR 1.23, 95%CI 1.05-1.44, p 0.01 and CTSL2 HR 1.36, 95%CI 1.1-1.69, p 0.005) and invasion axis (HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.26-2.13, p < 0.001) were associated with a higher rate of early recurrence. CD68 was associated with improved outcomes (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.38-0.83, p 0.004). For the risk of early recurrence in patients treated with trastuzumab in arm C, ER (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.74-0.97, p 0.02), PR (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.64-0.94, p 0.008), and estrogen axis (HR 0.7, 95%CI 0.57-0.87, p 0.001) were associated with improved outcomes. Invasion axis (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.08-2.41, p 0.02), Oncotype Dx risk group (3 vs. 1 and 2, HR 8.89, 95%CI 1.27-1124, p 0.02), and basal subtype (HR 2.77, 95%CI 1.1-5.95, p 0.03) were also significantly associated with worse outcomes. For risk of late recurrence, in arm A, ER (HR 1.22, 95%CI 1.04-1.44, p 0.02), PR (1.26, 95%CI 1.05-1.5, p 0.01), and estrogen axis (1.39, 95%CI 1.09-1.77, p 0.008) were associated with worse outcomes. Oncotype Dx risk group (3 vs. 1 and 2, HR 0.4, 95%CI 0.16-0.98, p 0.05) was associated with improved outcomes. However, neither individual gene, axis, nor intrinsic subtypes were associated with the risk of late recurrence in patients treated with trastuzumab. Conclusions: For risks of early recurrence, the invasion genes/axis were associated with increased risks of recurrence in patients with early-stage HER2+ BC regardless of trastuzumab treatment. Among patients treated with trastuzumab, ER genes/axis, Oncotype Dx risk group, and intrinsic subtype were prognostic for risks of recurrence in the first five years. For risks of late recurrence, ER genes/axis and Oncotype Dx risk group were prognostic but only in patients treated with chemotherapy alone. The ER genes/axis were associated with less recurrence in the first five years but worse after five years, reflecting a higher risk of late recurrence in ER/PR+ HER2+ BC patients treated with chemotherapy alone. However, none of the individual gene, axis, or intrinsic subtypes were associated with the risk of late recurrence in patients treated with trastuzumab. Therefore, future studies are needed to identify biomarkers for the risk of late recurrence in HER2+ BC patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab. Support: BCRF-19-161; U10CA180821, U10CA180882, Genentech. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00005970 Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Zhuo Li, Nadine Norton, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Gerardo Colon-Otero, Keith L. Knutson, Antonio C. Wolff, Edith A. Perez, E. A. Thompson. Effects of Intrinsic Subtypes and 21-gene Assay on the Early and Late Recurrence Risks in Patients with Early Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer: An Analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831 (Alliance) Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-05.

Background. Patients (pts) with early triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC) are at increased risk of breast cancer recurrence and death. Recent studies have focused on escalation of therapy, with current treatment standard of at least five drugs – and associated toxicities - for eTNBC. Though presence of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) as measured by residual cancer burden (RCB) helps guide addition of adjuvant treatment, more effective tools to tailor therapy are limited. Persistence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the setting of residual disease is associated with high risk of distant recurrence. However, more sensitive minimal residual disease (MRD) assays are needed to potentially guide optimization of systemic therapy. Methods. TBCRC 030 is a phase II randomized study of 12 weeks of NAT single agent cisplatin or paclitaxel for stage II-III TNBC, followed by surgery. The primary objective of the parent study was to correlate baseline biomarker for homologous recombination deficiency and RCB by study arm. From this group, responders (RCB 0/1) and non-responders (RCB 2/3) from both study arms who did not receive additional NAT prior to surgery were selected for analysis from the study cohort, matched on baseline nodal status and tumor size. As a post hoc study amendment, available pts were followed for event free survival (EFS). Plasma samples were collected prior to treatment initiation (W0), at three weeks (W3), and at twelve weeks, prior to surgery (W12). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on primary tumor tissue to identify somatic mutations and design for each pt a tumor-informed, ctDNA assay tracking up to 1000 mutations to detect MRD. Detection limit was computed for each tested sample as previously described. For each sample assayed, we report tumor fraction (TFx) when MRD was detected and the detection limit at 90% power when MRD was not detected. Results. Of 139 study pts, 68 had complete tissue and plasma samples and no receipt of additional NAT. Of these, 22 were responders. These responders, and 22 matched non-responders were identified for analysis. Data from 22 pts – 11 responders, 11 non-responders - are described here; full analysis on all 44 pts will be presented at the meeting. Personalized ctDNA assays were designed targeting 434 to 1000 variants (median 1000) and applied to 66 plasma samples. At W0, 100% (22/22) were positive for ctDNA; 73% (16/22) and 55% (12/22) were positive at W3, and W12, respectively. In pts with T1-T2 tumors median TFx was 4.1e-3(7.8e-6, 3.4e-2) and 4.7e-1(4.3e-2, 9.0e-1) in pts with T3-T4 tumors. TFx decreased from W0 to W3 and from W0 to W12 in responders (Table 1). By W12, ctDNA had cleared in 7/8 pts with RCB 0, 1/3 with RCB 1, 2/8 with RCB 2, and 0/3 with RCB 3. Overall, ctDNA levels were broad with median TFx of 1.5e-3 (range 2.9e-6 to 0.90). Detection limit at 90% power for all tested samples was a median of 8.8e-6 (range 9.9e-7 to 6.8e-3). To investigate whether ctDNA persistence after NAT was associated with BC recurrence, we analyzed a separate group of all 8 pts with known recurrence and with complete data and samples. All pts had persistent ctDNA at W12 (median TFx 6.8e-3, [2.9e-6 to 6.6e-2]). Conclusions. After 3 weeks of NAT for eTNBC, ctDNA TFx decreased, with a 3900-fold change in responders and 18-fold change in non-responders. By W3, TFx for most pts with RCB 0/1 were below the 1 in 10,000 limit of detection for many currently available assays, emphasizing the need for sensitive tests to potentially guide therapy. Additional studies will determine if ctDNA-guided approaches in eTNBC can improve pt outcomes. Table 1: Tumer Fraction and Tumer Fraction Fold Change by Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy Citation Format: Heather A. Parsons, Timothy Blewett, Xiangying Chu, Sainetra Sridhar, Katheryn Santos, Kan Xiong, Vandana Abramson, Ashka Patel, Ju Cheng, Adam M. Brufsky, Justin Rhoades, Jeremy Force, Ruolin Liu, Tiffany A. Traina, Lisa Carey, Mothaffar Rimawi, Ahmed Elkhanany, Vered Stearns, Jennifer M. Specht, Harold Burstein, Antonio C. Wolff, Eric Winer, Nabihah Tayob, Ian Krop, Todd Golub, Erica L. Mayer, Viktor Adalsteinsson. PD11-06 Circulating tumor DNA association with residual cancer burden after neoadjuvant therapy in triple negative breast cancer in TBCRC 030 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD11-06.

Background: As outcomes improve in early-stage breast cancer, clinical trials are undergoing a paradigm shift from intensification trials (more therapy) to improve survival to optimization trials, which assess the potential for using less toxic therapy while preserving survival outcomes. However, little is known about physician perspectives in community and academic settings about possible barriers and facilitators that could impact accrual to optimization clinical trials and about the generalizability of future findings. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study with semi-structured interviews of medical oncologists from different academic and community practices to assess their perspectives on optimization trials. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Three independent coders utilized a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. Results: Forty-six physicians were approached from 3/31/21-11/5/21; 39 oncologists from different oncology practices across 17 states completed interviews, 7 either declined or did not respond to email requests. Physician characteristics were balanced: men vs. women (49% vs 51%) and community oncologist vs. academic oncologist (49% vs 51%); and time practicing as medical oncologist (31% 0-9 years; 33% 10-19 years; 36% 20+ years). All 39 physicians reported that they would enroll patients in optimization clinical trials. Oncologists reported the need for treatment optimization, with one oncologist noting “historically, we’ve given way too much treatment to patients.” Oncologists highlighted specific reasons to consider optimization trials. They included quality of life improvement by reducing toxicity; reduction in financial toxicity; fertility preservation; ability to avoid chemotherapy; minimization of overtreatment in patients with comorbid conditions; personalized treatment; opportunities to test novel therapies; and leveraging the availability of targeted therapies. At the same time, there was hesitancy amongst some oncologists with this approach, “All my life I’ve worked to try to improve things and so I am not totally philosophically comfortable with the notion that I’m going to be happy with a result that says, we haven’t improved it but we can get by with less.” In addition, oncologists also identified accrual barriers, like tumor-specific biology, individual (host) factors (e.g. disease characteristics, patient demographics, patient psychological state, patient preferences), prognostic markers of risk, access to therapies, provider experience, and system constraints. They voiced recommendations regarding preliminary data, trial design, and tools to support communication about and enrollment in optimization trials. Conclusions: While optimization clinical trials are generally accepted to be beneficial by oncologists, barriers impact their acceptance. Scientifically robust design and education to overcome barriers are needed to support future enrollment on trials tailoring therapy based on risk and potential benefit to allow true personalization of treatment. Citation Format: Gabrielle B. Rocque, Andrews Courtney, Rachel M. Frazier, Lawhon Valerie, Stacey A. Ingram, Mary Lou Smith, Lynne I. Wagner, Lisa Zubkoff, Nadine Tung, Lauren P. Wallner, Antonio C. Wolff. Oncologist-reported Barriers and Facilitators to enrolling patients in optimization trials that test less intense cancer treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-04.

Introduction Breast cancer is uncommon in men. Almost all male breast cancers are hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, although the pathogenesis is not always attributable to an endocrine condition. A few studies have compared biological characteristics or molecular signatures with breast cancers in women. We sought to evaluate whether hormone receptor-related gene expression is different in cancers from men compared to equivalent cancers from women. SET2,3 index measures non-proliferative hormone receptor-related transcriptional activity in the cancer (SET-ER/PR index) and adjusts this for a Baseline Prognosis Index (BPI) that combines the measurements of tumor and nodal stage with a 4-gene molecular subtype (ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and AURKA). Methods We received aliquots of total RNA from male patients with breast cancer included in the retrospective cohort study of the EORTC 10085/BCG/TBCRC/BIG/NCTN International Male Breast Cancer Program (NCT01101425). SET2,3 assay was performed using the QuantiGene assay (Thermo Fisher) using bead-based hybridization and laser spectroscopy (Luminex). The statistical analyses were performed by the EORTC statistician. The primary objective of the study was the assessment of the prognostic value of the SET2,3 index score in patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative male breast cancer, treated with endocrine therapy. Clinical outcomes (recurrence-free survival – RFS; overall survival – OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves and secondarily compared using multivariable Cox models adjusted for continuous SET2,3 index, tumor size, nodal status, age, and chemotherapy and radiotherapy use. An exploratory analysis to compare the SET2,3 index scores distribution in female and male breast cancer patients was also performed using results from the same assay performed on cancers from women selected on the same inclusion criteria. Due to the low numbers of male patients treated with neoadjuvant treatment (N=6), this analysis was restricted to patients treated with adjuvant treatment (n=315 male and 660 female). Results Of the 321 male patients with breast cancer analyzed, treated between 1990 and 2010, 211 (65.7%) were categorized as high SET2,3 index score, reflecting a high endocrine activity in the cancer and low risk of recurrence, and 110 patients (34.3%) categorized as being low score, reflecting low endocrine activity and high risk of recurrence. At 5 years, the RFS was 75.0% (95% CI, 67.4-81.1) in the high SET2,3 group versus 60.7% (95% CI, 49.1-70.5) in the low SET2,3 group (HR univariate, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70; P< 0.0001). The 5-year OS rate among patients with a high SET2,3 index was 84.3% (95% CI, 45.5-73.8), in contrast of 67.8% (95% CI, 56.6-76.7) in the low SET2,3 group (HR univariate, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.65; P< 0.0001). SET2,3 was independently prognostic for OS, but not RFS in multivariable Cox models. In patients classified as low SET2,3, the addition of neo/adjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant endocrine therapy was associated with 5-year OS of 76.0% (95% CI, 59.5-86.4) and in patients who received endocrine therapy alone the 5-year OS was 61.3% (95% CI, 45.5-73.8), an absolute difference of 14.7 percentage points. Overall, we did not observe a difference in the distributions (median, interquartile range) of SET2,3 index between men (2.4, 1.9–2.6) and women (2.3, 2.0–2.7). Conclusion SET2,3 index measurements of endocrine-related transcriptional activity in male patients with breast cancer were not different from measurements in female patients with breast cancer. SET2,3 was prognostic in male breast cancer and our exploratory analysis suggests that chemotherapy might improve the poor prognosis for men with breast cancer that has low SET2,3 index. This study was funded by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF). Citation Format: Danielle B. Zakon, Coralie Poncet, Fatima Cardoso, Neven Anouk, Vicente Valero, Stefan Aebi, Kim Benstead, Oliver Bogler, Lissandra Dal Lago, Judith Fraser, Carmela Caballero, Ingrid A. Hedenfalk, Larissa A. Korde, Barbro Linderholm, John WM Martens, Lavinia P. Middleton, Melissa Murray, Catherine M. Kelly, Cecilia Nilsson, Monika Nowaczyk, Stephanie Peeters, Melanie Beauvois, Peggy Porter, Carolien P. Schroder, Isabel T. Rubio, Kathryn Ruddy, Christi van Asperen, Danielle Van Den Weyngaert, Carolien HM van Deurzen, Elise van Leeuwen-Stok, Joanna M. Vermeij, John MS Bartlett, Antonio C. Wolff, Sharon H. Giordano, W. Fraser Symmans. PD6-11 Evaluation of the Sensitivity to Endocrine Therapy Index (SET2,3) in Early Male Breast Cancer: Results from an analysis in the EORTC 10085/TBCRC/BIG/NCTN International Male Breast Cancer Program [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-11.

PURPOSE: As outcomes improve in early-stage breast cancer, clinical trials are undergoing a paradigm shift from intensification trials (more therapy) to improve survival to optimization trials, which assess the potential for using less toxic therapy while preserving survival outcomes. However, little is known about physician perspectives in community and academic settings about possible barriers and facilitators that could affect accrual to optimization clinical trials and the generalizability of future findings. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with semistructured interviews of medical oncologists from different academic and community practices to assess their perspectives on optimization trials. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Three independent coders used a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. RESULTS: All 39 physicians reported that they would enroll patients in optimization clinical trials. Oncologists highlighted specific reasons to consider optimization trials. These included quality-of-life improvement by reducing toxicity, reduction in financial toxicity, fertility preservation, ability to avoid chemotherapy, minimization of overtreatment in patients with comorbid conditions, personalized treatment, opportunities to test novel therapies, and leveraging the availability of targeted therapies. Oncologists also identified accrual barriers, such as tumor-specific biology, individual (host) factors, prognostic markers of risk, access to therapies, provider experience, and system constraints. They voiced recommendations regarding preliminary data, trial design, and tools to support enrollment in optimization trials. CONCLUSION: Although oncologists are generally willing to enroll patients on optimization clinical trials, barriers affect their acceptance. A scientific focus on overcoming these barriers is needed to support future enrollment on trials tailoring therapy on the basis of risk and potential benefit to allow true personalization of treatment.

Background Racial and ethnic differences in survival after a first cancer are well established but have not been examined after a second primary cancer (SPC) despite the increasing incidence among survivors. Methods We examined 39 029 female breast cancer survivors who developed an SPC between 2000 and 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression for competing risks data was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality after SPCs comparing Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Asian, and Non-Hispanic Black survivors with Non-Hispanic White survivors. Models were adjusted for sociodemographics, tumor characteristics, and treatments of the first and second cancer. Analyses were stratified by SPC type. Results During 17 years of follow-up, there were 15 117 deaths after SPCs. The risk of cancer death was 12% higher among Non-Hispanic Black survivors (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.19) and 8% higher among Hispanic survivors (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.16) compared with Non-Hispanic White survivors. In subgroup analyses, the strongest associations were observed among Non-Hispanic Black survivors with a second breast or uterine cancer and among Hispanic survivors with a second breast cancer. Non-Hispanic Black survivors also experienced a 44% higher risk of cardiovascular disease death after SPC diagnosis than Non-Hispanic White survivors (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.74). Conclusions Higher cancer mortality among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic survivors and higher cardiovascular mortality among Non-Hispanic Black survivors exist among women who survive a first breast cancer to develop an SPC. Studies focused on identifying the contributors to these disparities are needed to enable implementation of effective mitigation strategies.

Purpose:We previously demonstrated that high levels of circulating methylated DNA are associated with subsequent disease progression in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of a novel liquid biopsy-breast cancer methylation (LBx-BCM) prototype assay using the GeneXpert cartridge system for early assessment of disease progression in MBC.Experimental Design:The 9-marker LBx-BCM prototype assay was evaluated in TBCRC 005, a prospective biomarker study, using plasma collected at baseline, week 4, and week 8 from 144 patients with MBC.Results:At week 4, patients with MBC with high cumulative methylation (CM) had a significantly shorter median PFS (2.88 months vs. 6.60 months, P = 0.001) and OS (14.52 months vs. 22.44 months, P = 0.005) compared with those with low CM. In a multivariable model, high versus low CM was also associated with shorter PFS (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.20–3.01; P = 0.006). Change in CM from baseline to week 4 (OR, 4.60; 95% CI, 1.77–11.93; P = 0.002) and high levels of CM at week 4 (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.29–5.99; P = 0.009) were associated with progressive disease at the time of first restaging. A robust risk model based on week 4 circulating CM levels was developed to predict disease progression as early as 3 months after initiating a new treatment.Conclusions:The automated LBx-BCM prototype assay is a promising clinical tool for detecting disease progression a month after initiating treatment in women with MBC undergoing routine care. The next step is to validate its clinical utility for specific treatments.

Background: Historically, less than 10% of adult patients with cancer enroll in clinical trials, however, enrollment dropped further at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers to trial participation during the pandemic have not been reported. As part of the TBCRC 057 survey on the impact of the pandemic on willingness to participate in breast cancer trials, we assessed reasons for reluctance to participate in trials during the pandemic. Methods: US residents who self-reported a breast cancer diagnosis were eligible to complete the online survey 8/6/21-9/30/21. Respondents indicated whether they were current trial participants and, if not, their willingness to consider participating in a trial during the pandemic using a 5-point scale (0-not at all willing to 4-definitely willing). Respondents who were not current trial participants and who were not “definitely willing” to consider participation during the pandemic were characterized as “reluctant” and asked to select reasons for their reluctance from a checklist. Pandemic-related anxiety was assessed on an 11-point scale (0-no anxiety to 10-worst anxiety possible). Respondents indicated how the option to conduct trial activities online would affect their decision to participate in a trial (much less likely, somewhat less likely, would not affect my decision, somewhat more likely, or much more likely). In exploratory analyses, we evaluated whether pandemic-related anxiety and favorable reactions towards opportunities to conduct trial activities online were associated with reluctance to consider trial participation during the pandemic due to fear of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Means were compared with two sample t-tests and proportions with Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of 385 survey respondents, 185 (48%) were characterized as reluctant to consider trial participation during the pandemic. Among these 185, median age was 55 (range 25-80), 85.7% were non-Hispanic White, 48.1% had metastatic disease and 44.2% received care at academic centers. Reasons for reluctance to consider trial participation during the pandemic cited by ≥15% of the 185 reluctant respondents are shown in the Table. Respondents who selected fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 as a reason for their reluctance to consider participating in a trial during the pandemic had higher mean pandemic-related anxiety (7.0 vs 5.2, p< 0.001). These respondents were more likely to indicate telemedicine doctor visits (p=0.01), virtual consents (p=0.001) and online study questionnaires (p=0.001) would make them somewhat or much more likely to participate in trials than respondents who did not select fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 as a reason for their reluctance. Conclusions: Reasons for reluctance of patients with breast cancer to consider participation in clinical trials during the pandemic are multifactorial. Although concerns about safety and efficacy remain prominent, fear of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 drives unwillingness to participate in >25% of reluctant patients. Trial accrual may benefit from incorporation of electronic activities when possible. Table Citation Format: Karen L. Smith, Carolyn Mead-Harvey, Gina L. Mazza, Albert E. Holler, Eileen Shinn, Elizabeth Frank, Michelle Melisko, Cyd Eaton, Jeannine M. Salamone, Teri Pollastro, Patricia Spears, Antonio C. Wolff, Gabrielle B. Rocque. Reasons for Reduced Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC) 057 Survey [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-07.

Survivorship care plans (SCPs) communicate cancer-related information from oncology providers to patients and primary care providers. SCPs may limit overuse testing by specifying necessary follow-up care. From a randomized, controlled trial of SCP delivery, we examined whether cancer-related tests not specified in SCPs, but conducted after SCP receipt, were appropriate or consistent with overuse.Survivors of breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer treated at urban-academic or rural-community health systems were randomized to one of three SCP delivery arms. Tests during 18 months after SCP receipt were classified as consistent with overuse if they were (1) not included in SCPs and (2) on a guideline-based predetermined list of "not recommended surveillance." After chart abstraction, physicians performed review and adjudication of potential overuse. Descriptive analyses were conducted of tests consistent with overuse. Negative binomial regression models determined if testing consistent with overuse differed across study arms.Among 316 patients (137 breast, 67 colorectal, 112 prostate), 140 individual tests were identified as potential overuse. Upon review, 98 were deemed to be consistent with overuse: 78 tumor markers and 20 imaging tests. The majority of overuse testing was breast cancer-related (95%). Across sites, 27 patients (9%) received ≥1 test consistent with overuse; most were breast cancer patients (22/27). Exploratory analyses of overuse test frequency by study arm showed no significant difference.This analysis identified practice patterns consistent with overuse of surveillance testing and can inform efforts to improve guideline-concordant care. Future interventions may include individual practice patterns and provider education.

Background The Pathways to Wellness trial tested the efficacy of 2 interventions for younger breast cancer survivors: mindful awareness practices (MAPs) and survivorship education (SE). This planned secondary analysis examines intervention effects on stress, positive psychological outcomes, and inflammation (Clincaltrials.gov NCT03025139). Methods Women diagnosed with breast cancer at or before age 50 years who had completed treatment and had elevated depressive symptoms were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of MAPs, SE, or wait-list control (WLC). Assessments conducted at pre- and postintervention and at 3- and 6-month follow-up measured general stress perceptions, cancer-related intrusive thoughts and worry, positive affect, meaning and peace in life, altruism and empathy, and markers of inflammation. Analyses compared change in outcomes over time in each intervention group relative to WLC using linear mixed models. Results A total 247 women were randomly assigned to MAPs (n = 85), SE (n = 81), or WLC (n = 81). MAPs statistically significantly decreased intrusive thoughts and worry at postintervention and 3-month follow-up relative to WLC (P Conclusion MAPs had beneficial effects on psychological and immune outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors and is a promising approach for enhancing biobehavioral health.

Poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are active in patients with germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-mutated breast cancer, accounting for 5% to 10% of all breast cancers. Another 5% to 10% harbor somatic BRCA1/2 (sBRCA1/2) mutations or mutations in non-BRCA1/2, homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes but until recently, there were no data for the use of PARPi in these patients. This study examines the use of olaparib in patients with metastatic breast cancer harboring sBRCA1/2 or germline or somatic non-BRCA1/2, HRR mutations and demonstrates potential activity of PARPi in this setting.In this retrospective, single institution study, patients who were treated with off-label, off-protocol olaparib for metastatic breast cancer harboring sBRCA1/2 or germline or somatic non-BRCA1/2, HRR mutations were identified. The primary aim was to describe these patients' demographics, tumor characteristics, mutations, safety and tolerability, response rates, progression free survival, PARPi-associated survival and subsequent treatment.Seven patients were treated off-label, off-trial with olaparib for sBRCA1/2-mutated cancers (n = 4) or non-BRCA1/2, HRR-mutated cancers (n = 3). All patients with sBRCA1/2-mutated cancers responded to PARP inhibition; patients with non-BRCA1/2, HRR-mutated cancers did not respond. The median progression free survival in patients with a sBRCA1/2 mutation was 6.5 months (range 5-9 months) vs. 3 months (range 2-4 months) in patients with non-BRCA1/2, HRR mutations.This single institution experience adds to recent larger reports confirming evidence for PARPi therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer harboring sBRCA1/2 mutations. No activity was observed in patients with either germline or somatic non-BRCA1/2, HRR-mutated cancers.

Current molecular liquid biopsy assays to detect recurrence or monitor response to treatment require sophisticated technology, highly trained personnel, and a turnaround time of weeks. We describe the development and technical validation of an automated Liquid Biopsy for Breast Cancer Methylation (LBx-BCM) prototype, a DNA methylation detection cartridge assay that is simple to perform and quantitatively detects nine methylated markers within 4.5 hours. LBx-BCM demonstrated high interassay reproducibility when analyzing exogenous methylated DNA (75–300 DNA copies) spiked into plasma (coefficient of variation, CV = 7.1%–10.9%) and serum (CV = 19.1%–36.1%). It also demonstrated high interuser reproducibility (Spearman r = 0.887, P < 0.0001) when samples of metastatic breast cancer (MBC, N = 11) and normal control (N = 4) were evaluated independently by two users. Analyses of interplatform reproducibility indicated very high concordance between LBx-BCM and the reference assay, cMethDNA, among 66 paired plasma samples [MBC N = 40, controls N = 26; Spearman r = 0.891; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.825–0.933, P < 0.0001]. LBx-BCM achieved a ROC AUC = 0.909 (95% CI = 0.836–0.982), 83% sensitivity and 92% specificity; cMethDNA achieved a ROC AUC = 0.896 (95% CI = 0.817–0.974), 83% sensitivity and 92% specificity in test set samples. The automated LBx-BCM cartridge prototype is fast, with performance levels equivalent to the highly sensitive, manual cMethDNA method. Future prospective clinical studies will evaluate LBx-BCM detection sensitivity and its ability to monitor therapeutic response during treatment for advanced breast cancer. Significance: We technically validated an automated, cartridge-based, liquid biopsy prototype assay, to quantitatively measure breast cancer methylation in serum or plasma of patients with MBC, that demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity.

PURPOSE To update recommendations on appropriate use of breast cancer biomarker assay results to guide adjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy decisions in early-stage breast cancer. METHODS An updated literature search identified randomized clinical trials and prospective-retrospective studies published from January 2016 to October 2021. Outcomes of interest included overall survival and disease-free or recurrence-free survival. Expert Panel members used informal consensus to develop evidence-based recommendations. RESULTS The search identified 24 studies informing the evidence base. RECOMMENDATIONS Clinicians may use Onco type DX, MammaPrint, Breast Cancer Index (BCI), and EndoPredict to guide adjuvant endocrine and chemotherapy in patients who are postmenopausal or age > 50 years with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative (ER+ and HER2–) breast cancer that is node-negative or with 1-3 positive nodes. Prosigna and BCI may be used in postmenopausal patients with node-negative ER+ and HER2– breast cancer. In premenopausal patients, clinicians may use Onco type in patients with node-negative ER+ and HER2– breast cancer. Current data suggest that premenopausal patients with 1-3 positive nodes benefit from chemotherapy regardless of genomic assay result. There are no data on use of genomic tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ≥ 4 positive nodes. Ki67 combined with other parameters or immunohistochemistry 4 score may be used in postmenopausal patients without access to genomic tests to guide adjuvant therapy decisions. BCI may be offered to patients with 0-3 positive nodes who received 5 years of endocrine therapy without evidence of recurrence to guide decisions about extended endocrine therapy. None of the assays are recommended for treatment guidance in individuals with HER2-positive or triple-negative breast cancer. Treatment decisions should also consider disease stage, comorbidities, and patient preferences. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

Background: Clinical trials reported 25-30% pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2+ breast cancer (BC) patients treated with anti-HER2 therapies without chemotherapy. We hypothesize that a multiparameter classifier can identify patients with HER2 “addicted” tumors who may benefit from a chemotherapy-sparing strategy. Patients and Methods: Baseline HER2+ BC specimens from TBCRC023 and PAMELA trials of neoadjuvant lapatinib+trastuzumab (plus endocrine therapy in ER+ tumors) were used. HER2 protein and gene amplification (ratio), HER2-enriched (HER2-E), and PIK3CA mutation status were assessed by dual gene protein assay (GPA), research-based PAM50, and targeted DNA-sequencing. GPA cutoffs and classifier of response were constructed in TBCRC023 using a decision tree algorithm, then validated in PAMELA. Results: In TBCRC023, 72 BCs had GPA, PAM50, and sequencing data, of which 15 had pCR. Recursive partitioning identified cutoffs of HER2 ratio≥4.6 and %3+ IHC-staining≥97.5%. With PAM50 and sequencing data, the model added HER2-E and PIK3CA wild-type (wt). For clinical implementation, the classifier was locked as HER2 ratio≥4.5 and %3+ IHC-staining≥90% and PIK3CA-wt and HER2-E, yielding 55% and 94% positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values, respectively. Independent validation using 44 PAMELA cases with all three biomarkers yielded 47% PPV and 82% NPV. Importantly, our classifier’s high NPV signifies its strength in accurately identifying patients who may not be good candidates for treatment de-escalation. Conclusions: Our multiparameter classifier differentially identifies patients who may benefit from HER2-targeted therapy alone from those who need chemotherapy and predicts pCR to anti-HER2 therapy alone comparable to chemotherapy plus dual anti-HER2 therapy in unselected patients.

The table provides a step by step guide to calculate methylation in each gene followed by cumulative methylation using the algorithm derived in this paper.

Figure shows the perfomance of LBx-BCM in the training set samples. A histogram shows cumulative methylation for each sample, and a box plot shows significnt difference of methylation in serum of metastatic breast cancer patients compared to normal individuals (Mann Whitney p= 0.002)

Current molecular liquid biopsy assays to detect recurrence or monitor response to treatment require sophisticated technology, highly trained personnel, and a turnaround time of weeks. We describe the development and technical validation of an automated Liquid Biopsy for Breast Cancer Methylation (LBx-BCM) prototype, a DNA methylation detection cartridge assay that is simple to perform and quantitatively detects nine methylated markers within 4.5 hours. LBx-BCM demonstrated high interassay reproducibility when analyzing exogenous methylated DNA (75–300 DNA copies) spiked into plasma (coefficient of variation, CV = 7.1%–10.9%) and serum (CV = 19.1%–36.1%). It also demonstrated high interuser reproducibility (Spearman r = 0.887, P < 0.0001) when samples of metastatic breast cancer (MBC, N = 11) and normal control (N = 4) were evaluated independently by two users. Analyses of interplatform reproducibility indicated very high concordance between LBx-BCM and the reference assay, cMethDNA, among 66 paired plasma samples [MBC N = 40, controls N = 26; Spearman r = 0.891; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.825–0.933, P < 0.0001]. LBx-BCM achieved a ROC AUC = 0.909 (95% CI = 0.836–0.982), 83% sensitivity and 92% specificity; cMethDNA achieved a ROC AUC = 0.896 (95% CI = 0.817–0.974), 83% sensitivity and 92% specificity in test set samples. The automated LBx-BCM cartridge prototype is fast, with performance levels equivalent to the highly sensitive, manual cMethDNA method. Future prospective clinical studies will evaluate LBx-BCM detection sensitivity and its ability to monitor therapeutic response during treatment for advanced breast cancer.Significance:We technically validated an automated, cartridge-based, liquid biopsy prototype assay, to quantitatively measure breast cancer methylation in serum or plasma of patients with MBC, that demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity.

Purpose:We previously demonstrated that high levels of circulating methylated DNA are associated with subsequent disease progression in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study, we evaluated the clinical utility of a novel liquid biopsy-breast cancer methylation (LBx-BCM) prototype assay using the GeneXpert cartridge system for early assessment of disease progression in MBC.Experimental Design:The 9-marker LBx-BCM prototype assay was evaluated in TBCRC 005, a prospective biomarker study, using plasma collected at baseline, week 4, and week 8 from 144 patients with MBC.Results:At week 4, patients with MBC with high cumulative methylation (CM) had a significantly shorter median PFS (2.88 months vs. 6.60 months, P = 0.001) and OS (14.52 months vs. 22.44 months, P = 0.005) compared with those with low CM. In a multivariable model, high versus low CM was also associated with shorter PFS (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.20–3.01; P = 0.006). Change in CM from baseline to week 4 (OR, 4.60; 95% CI, 1.77–11.93; P = 0.002) and high levels of CM at week 4 (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 1.29–5.99; P = 0.009) were associated with progressive disease at the time of first restaging. A robust risk model based on week 4 circulating CM levels was developed to predict disease progression as early as 3 months after initiating a new treatment.Conclusions:The automated LBx-BCM prototype assay is a promising clinical tool for detecting disease progression a month after initiating treatment in women with MBC undergoing routine care. The next step is to validate its clinical utility for specific treatments.

Association between week 4 CM and disease status at first restaging after adjusting for CEA.

Supplementary Figure 2 displays the relationship between the week 8 CM level and the change in CM level (Week 8 – baseline). Figure S4B and C use box plots to display the relationship between disease status at first restaging and week 8 CM level or change in CM level (Week 8 – baseline).

Exploratory analysis comparing weight loss across various clinical subgroups.

Global and promoter CpG island demethylation in available paired pre- and post-treatment (8 weeks) hormone-resistant and triple-negative tumor biopsies.

Purpose: Tigatuzumab (TIG), an agonistic anti-DR5 antibody, triggers apoptosis in DR5+ human tumor cells without crosslinking. TIG has strong in vitro/in vivo activity against basal-like breast cancer cells enhanced by chemotherapy agents. This study evaluates activity of TIG and chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Experimental Design: Randomized 2:1 phase II trial of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PAC) ± TIG in patients with TNBC stratified by prior chemotherapy. Patients received nab-PAC weekly × 3 ± TIG every other week, every 28 days. Primary objective was within-arm objective response rate (ORR). Secondary objectives were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit, and TIG immunogenicity. Metastatic research biopsies were required.Results: Among 64 patients (60 treated; TIG/nab-PAC n = 39 and nab-PAC n = 21), there were 3 complete remissions (CR), 8 partial remissions (PR; 1 almost CR), 11 stable diseases (SD), and 17 progressive diseases (PD) in the TIG/nab-PAC arm (ORR, 28%), and no CRs, 8 PRs, 4 SDs, and 9 PDs in the nab-PAC arm (ORR, 38%). There was a numerical increase in CRs and several patients had prolonged PFS (1,025+, 781, 672, 460, 334) in the TIG/nab-PAC arm. Grade 3 toxicities were 28% and 29%, respectively, with no grade 4–5. Exploratory analysis suggests an association of ROCK1 gene pathway activation with efficacy in the TIG/nab-PAC arm.Conclusions: ORR and PFS were similar in both. Preclinical activity of TIG in basal-like breast cancer and prolonged PFS in few patients in the combination arm support further investigation of anti-DR5 agents. ROCK pathway activation merits further evaluation. Clin Cancer Res; 21(12); 2722–9. ©2015 AACR.See related article by Paoletti et al., p. 2771

Change in waist circumference from baseline to six-months in patients assigned to POWER-remote and self-directed arms.

Supplementary Table and Figure Legends

Gene list and biological pathways of significant differentially expressed genes in hormone-resistant breast cancer volcano plot.

Purpose: The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in breast cancer has not been demonstrated. We hypothesized that we could perform NGS of a new biopsy from patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a clinically actionable timeframe.Experimental Design: We planned to enroll 40 patients onto a prospective study, Individualized Molecular Analyses Guide Efforts (IMAGE), to evaluate the feasibility of obtaining a new biopsy of a metastatic site, perform NGS (FoundationOne), and convene a molecular tumor board to formulate treatment recommendations within 28 days. We collected blood at baseline and at time of restaging to assess cell-free circulating plasma tumor DNA (ptDNA).Results: We enrolled 26 women with metastatic TNBC who had received ≥1 line of prior chemotherapy, and 20 (77%) underwent NGS of a metastatic site biopsy. Twelve (60%) evaluable patients received treatment recommendations within 28 days of consent. The study closed after 20 patients underwent NGS, based on protocol-specified interim futility analysis. Three patients went on to receive genomically directed therapies. Twenty-four of 26 patients had genetic alterations successfully detected in ptDNA. Among 5 patients, 4 mutations found in tumor tissues were not identified in blood, and 4 mutations found in blood were not found in corresponding tumors. In 9 patients, NGS of follow-up blood samples showed 100% concordance with baseline blood samples.Conclusions: This study demonstrates challenges of performing NGS on prospective tissue biopsies in patients with metastatic TNBC within 28 days, while also highlighting the potential use of blood as a more time-efficient and less invasive method of mutational assessment. Clin Cancer Res; 23(2); 379–86. ©2016 AACR.

Characteristics of TBCRC023 Patients with disease progression

Kaplan-Meier curves for survival after disease progression among women with advanced hormone-resistant breast cancer by optional continuation (blue curve) or event monitoring (red curve). The 95% confidence limits are shaded; Tick marks indicate censored data.