Search

BackgroundUnderstanding how prenatal care influences planned postpartum contraception can help guide shared decision-making. This study looks to examine the association of the quality of prenatal care with planned postpartum contraception.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single tertiary, academic urban institution in the southwest United States. The institutional review board (IRB) for human research at Valleywise Health Medical Center approved this study. Using a validated measure of prenatal care, the Kessner index, prenatal care was classified as adequate, intermediate, or inadequate. The World Health Organization (WHO) protocol for contraceptive effectiveness was used to classify contraceptives as very effective, effective, and less effective. The planned contraceptive choice was determined at the time of hospital discharge after delivery by discharge summary. Chi-squared testing and logistic regression were used to measure associations between the adequacy of prenatal care and contraceptive planning.ResultsThis study included 450 deliveries, 404 (90%) patients with adequate prenatal care, and 46 (10%) patients without adequate (intermediate or inadequate) prenatal care. There was not a statistically significant difference in planning for very effective or effective methods of contraception at hospital discharge between adequate (74%) and non-adequate (61%) prenatal care groups (p = 0.06). There was no association between the adequacy of prenatal care and the effectiveness of contraceptive planning after controlling for age and parity (aOR = 1.7, 95% CI 0.89-3.22).ConclusionsMany women chose very effective and effective methods of postpartum contraception; however, there was no statistically significant association between the quality of prenatal care and planned contraception at hospital discharge.

Background: Applying to emergency medicine (EM) residency programs as a medical student is challenging and complicated in a normal year, but the 2020/2021 application cycle was further complicated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the decrease of in-person opportunities for students to connect with residency programs, virtual “town-hall” meetings were developed. In this study our primary objective was to determine whether attendance at a virtual residency program information session improved the perceived knowledge of curriculum information and program exposure to medical students applying to an EM residency.Methods: Four study sites hosted a total of 12 virtual events consisting of residents, faculty, or both. Standardized pre-event/post-event surveys were conducted to capture medical student perceptions before/after each of the virtual sessions. Apart from measuring the improvement in students’ perceived knowledge of a program by gauging their responses to each question, we used a 10-question composite score to compare pre- vs post-event improvement among the participants.Results: The pre-event survey was completed by 195 attendees, and the post-event survey was completed by 123 attendees. The median and mean composite score to this 10-question survey improved from 32.19 to 45, and 31.45 to 44.2, respectively, in the pre- to post-event survey.Conclusion: This study showed improvement of medical students’ perceived knowledge of residency programs (reflected as increased agreement from pre- to post-event survey). The data demonstrates through question responses that students not only obtained information about the programs but also were able to gain exposure to the culture and “feel” of a program. In a non-traditional application season in which students are unable to pursue their interest in a program through audition rotations, virtual town hall events, along with other asynchronous events, may be a reasonable approach to increasing medical student understanding and awareness of a program and its culture.

Introduction: The American College of Emergency Physicians guidelines recommend more aggressive workup beyond imaging alone in patients with a high pretest probability (PTP) of pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the ability of multiple tests to safely rule out PE in high PTP patients is not known. We sought to measure the ability of negative computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) along with negative D-dimer to rule out PE in these high-risk patients.Methods: We analyzed data from a previous prospective observational study conducted in 12 emergency departments (ED). Wells score criteria were entered by providers before final PE testing. PE was diagnosed by imaging on the index ED visit, or within 45 days, demonstrating either PE ordeep vein thrombosis (DVT), or if the patient died of PE during the 45-day, follow-up period. Testing threshold was set at 1.8%.Results: A total of 7,940 patients were enrolled and tested for PE, and 257 had high PTP (Wells >6). Sixteen of these high-risk patients had negative CTPA and negative D-dimer, of whom two were positive for PE (12.5% [95% confidence interval 2.2%-40.0%]). One of these patients had a DVT on CT venogram and the other was diagnosed at follow-up.Conclusion: Our analysis suggests that in patients with high PTP of PE, neither negative CTPA by itself nor a negative CTPA plus a negative D-dimer are sufficient to rule out PE. More aggressive workup strategies may be required for these patients.

Background and aimsTo assess whether aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) levels can predict the diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) or any other diagnoses and whether PBC occurs either simultaneously or independently of other liver diseases among antimitochondrial antibody (AMA)-positive patients.MethodsDemographic and clinical variables were assessed in 90 AMA-positive patients with and without liver biopsies. These patients were further categorised as having a diagnosis of PBC, overlap syndrome or 'not established with a diagnosis of PBC'. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to determine the thresholds of liver enzymes that predict these three diagnoses.ResultsThe 48 patients with liver biopsies were more frequently female and had significantly higher AP levels compared with the non-liver biopsy group. Based on liver biopsy findings, 12, 12 and 22 patients were assigned a diagnosis of PBC, overlap syndrome with autoimmune hepatitis and PBC and 'not established diagnosis of PBC', respectively. Seven of 12 patients classified as PBC had AP level of ˂200 IU. AST, ALT and AP levels were significant predictors of a diagnosis of overlap syndrome compared with the rest of the patients; however, these tests were not discriminatory between diagnoses of PBC and 'not established with PBC'. Findings of fatty liver and bile duct injury on liver biopsies were not significantly associated with any liver test pattern.ConclusionsAs the liver test pattern did not correlate with the liver biopsy findings of PBC or other non-PBC diagnoses in AMA-positive patients at risk for other disease, a liver biopsy and/or non-invasive liver assessment along with serum liver tests should be interpreted to complete liver evaluation.

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent an enormous public health burden in the United States. Emergency departments (EDs) are a significant source of medical care, particularly for vulnerable patient populations. Guidelines for the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis have evolved and now recommend doxycycline 100 mg orally twice daily for 7 days as the primary regimen for adults. However, the single-dose azithromycin regimen can be given during the ED visit, while the new regimen has nonadherence hurdles. The purpose of this study will be determining the rate of ED discharge prescription pick ups of doxycycline for Chlamydia trachomatis infection at two discharge pharmacies. This is a retrospective chart review of information contained in the electronic medical record (EMR) from August 1st, 2021 – July 31st, 2022. Adult patients who present to the two EDs in the healthcare system and those who received empiric antibiotic treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection prior to, or at, ED discharge will be included. Patients who are pregnant, less than 18 years old, those without a Chlamydia trachomatis nucleic acid amplification test during their ED visit, or patients whose antibiotic treatment prescription was sent to a pharmacy other than the two primary discharge pharmacies at the respective medical centers will be excluded. The primary outcome of this study will be determining the rate of emergency department (ED) discharge prescription pick ups of doxycycline for empiric treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection at two discharge pharmacies. The secondary outcomes will include the incidence of repeat positive tests between four weeks and 90 days, risk of repeat positive tests in those who do not fill doxycycline, number of positive and negative test results, rate of prescribing adherence to 2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines regimens for empiric treatment, and insurance status at the time of discharge fill. Seven hundred and thirty patients were pulled from the EMR. One hundred of the patients were excluded from the study as they did not receive empiric antibiotic treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection prior to, or at, ED discharge leaving 630 participants. Among this group, 369 patients were excluded as their discharge prescription was not sent to the discharge pharmacies within the medical system, leaving 261 individuals in the study. Per chart review, 215 of the patients picked up their doxycycline prescription (82.4%) and 46 (17.6%) patients failed to pick up their prescription. Additionally, 43 (16.5) of the patients who were prescribed empiric therapy had a positive chlamydia trachomatis test, while 209 (83.5%) of those had a negative test. This study also showed 188 (72%) patients received treatment according to the current CDC recommendations. Majority of patients who received prescriptions from the in-hospital discharge pharmacy picked up their prescriptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Scorpion envenomation is a common emergency department presentation in Arizona and antivenom is often administered. This study evaluates the safety of Centruroides (Scorpion) Immune F(ab')2 (Equine) administered as a single-vial-serial dosing strategy via slow intravenous push (IVP) over five minutes in the emergency department. This was a retrospective chart review of patients who received at least one vial of antivenom between April 1, 2019, and July 31, 2021. The primary outcome of this study was the rate of the serious antivenom administration-related adverse events. Twenty-five patients were included. One patient met criteria for a serious administration-related adverse event. No other serious administration, non-serious administration, or non-administration related adverse events were found. Neither grade of envenomation, repeat doses, nor total number of vials affected the rate of serious, non-serious, or non-administration-related adverse events. The primary outcome of a serious administration-related adverse event occurred in one patient (4%) with a grade IV envenomation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article provides an overview of the ecological studies conducted on Nardostachys grandiflora, an endangered medicinal plant found in the alpine region of Sikkim Himalaya. The plant is known for its medicinal and aromatic properties and is used to treat various conditions. However, the species is at risk of extinction due to over-collection, habitat degradation, and climate change. The study reveals low population densities of N. grandiflora in the observed sites, particularly in the North and East districts. Urgent conservation measures are needed to protect this highly endangered plant. The study suggests strategies such as sustainable harvesting, reintroduction of plants, and regular monitoring to conserve the species. [Extracted from the article]

Midazolam is frequently used as a single agent to provide minimal sedation (also called anxiolysis) when performing procedures in minor children. Published guidelines on the optimal use of intranasal (INM) and oral midazolam (POM) are lacking. The purpose of this study is to explore the self-reported physician practice related to midazolam use in facilitating minor procedures in children. We developed a survey that was approved by the Academy of Pediatrics Section on Emergency Medicine (APP-SOEM) and was then electronically distributed via its listserve. Questions were posed about the therapeutic and maximum dosing of INM and POM, consideration of Nothing-By-Mouth (NPO) status, use of cardiopulmonary monitors, as well as discharge criteria. There was a 47% (218/465) response rate. For therapeutic INM doses, 65% of responders used a dose range of 0.3 to 0.6 mg/kg, and 75% selected a maximum dose of 10 mg irrespective of the child's weight. About 20% of the responders selected a dosage range of 0.7 to 1 mg/kg for therapeutic POM dose, with 43% opting for a maximum dose of 20 mg irrespective of the child's weight. We observed a dichotomous variation in reported physician use of cardiopulmonary monitors; 42% never employ monitors, and the remainder used monitors some of the time. There was consensus on the NPO status and discharge criteria; 80% of physicians did not consider NPO status prior to midazolam use. The level of alertness was the most commonly selected discharge criterion. This nationwide survey of physicians indicates practice variation with midazolam dosing and cardiopulmonary monitor usage when performing minor procedures in children. Implementing practice guidelines, specifically for minimal sedation with mainstay agents such as midazolam, may standardize physician practice and improve overall patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]