Search

The penetration of ciprofloxacin (500 mg) and ofloxacin (400 mg) into pancreatic juice following a single oral dose, was investigated in seven patients who had undergone pancreatic transplantation. With a special technique for segmental pancreatic transplantation it was possible to collect pure pancreatic juice at regular intervals for up to 24 h after drug intake. The antibiotic concentrations were determined by the agar-well diffusion method. The concentration of ciprofloxacin in pancreatic juice was 36% of that in serum. The same figure for ofloxacin was 92%. The mean peak level in pancreatic juice was 0.5±0.0 mg/l (±s.E.) for ciprofloxacin and occurred at 4 h after drug intake. The same figure for ofloxacin was 2.7±0.7 mg/l (±S.E.) occurring at 3·6h. The decrease in concentrations with time was parallel to the serum concentration curves for both antibiotics. The concentrations of ofloxacin in pancreatic juice exceeded the MIC values for most of the organisms causing infections in the pancreas for several hours after an oral dose. The concentrations of ciprofloxacin only briefly exceeded the MIC for the same organisms. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: It is unclear to what extent cancer history affects posttransplantation mortality in solid organ transplant recipients., Methods: We identified a Swedish population-based cohort of solid organ transplant recipients in the National Patient Register 1970 to 2008 and linked it to the Cancer and Cause-of-Death Register. Overall and cause-specific mortality was estimated using Cox regression., Results: Of 10,448 eligible recipients, 416 (4%) had a prior malignancy unrelated to the indication for transplantation diagnosed 2 months or more before surgery (median, 5.7 years). Mortality among cancer history recipients was 30% increased after transplantation, compared with other recipients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-1.5; P<0.001), driven by cancer-specific death with no increase in cardiovascular, infectious, or other noncancer mortality. An increased rate of death due to cancer history was primarily observed among nonkidney recipients (adjusted HR(nonkidney), 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.5; HR(kidney), 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4). Rates were greatest for patients with waiting times of 5 years or less but persisted with waiting times more than 10 years among kidney and nonkidney recipients with prior aggressive cancer types (gastrointestinal, breast, kidney/urothelial, and hematologic malignancies)., Conclusion: We conclude that organ transplant recipients with cancer history are at a moderately increased rate of death after transplantation, driven primarily by death due to cancer recurrence.

Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of a wide range of malignancies, especially cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (SCC). Few previous population-based studies have quantified and compared cancer risks according to graft type and with long-term follow-up. Using nationwide Swedish registers, we identified 10,476 recipients transplanted from 1970 to 2008 and followed them for cancer occurrence. Relative risks of cancer in comparison with the general population were expressed as standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and within the transplanted cohort as incidence rate ratios (IRR). During a total follow-up of 93,432 person-years, patients were diagnosed with 1,175 cancers excluding SCC, and with 2,231 SCC, SIR(cancer excl SCC) 2.4 (95% CI, 2.2-2.5); SIR(SCC) 121 (95% CI, 116-127). Cancer risks were most increased among heart and/or lung recipients SIR(cancer excl SCC) 3.3 (95% CI, 2.8-4.0); SIR(SCC) 198 (95% CI, 174-224), followed by kidney SIR(cancer excl SCC) 2.3 (95% CI, 2.1-2.4); SIR(SCC) 121 (95% CI, 116-127) and liver recipients SIR(cancer excl SCC) 2.3 (95% CI, 1.9-2.8); SIR(SCC) 32 (95% CI, 24-42). During follow-up, risk of cancer excluding SCC remained stable while risk of SCC tripled over 20 years irrespective of graft type, partly due to a subgroup of patients developing new SCCs at a rapidly increasing rate. In summary, post-transplant cancer risk varied by transplanted organ and by cancer site, with the bulk of the excess risk driven by an exceptionally high and accelerating risk of SCC. These findings underscore the importance of regular skin screening in organ transplant recipients., (Copyright © 2012 UICC.)

Aims: The influence of the trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole combination on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of sirolimus, a potent macrocyclic immunosuppressant, was studied in renal transplant recipients., Methods: Fifteen kidney transplant recipients were treated with sirolimus 8-23 mg m(-2) in combination with azathioprine and prednisolone from the day of transplantation. Whole blood sirolimus AUC and C(max) were determined on days 6 and 7 after transplantation. On day 7, sirolimus was coadministered with the first dose of trimethoprim (80 mg) and sulphamethoxazole (400 mg)., Results: On day 6, the mean (95% confidence interval) whole blood sirolimus AUC((0-24 h)) was 1040 (846, 1234) ng ml(-1) and mean C(max) was 109 (88, 129) ng ml(-1). Corresponding values on day 7 were AUC((0-24 h)) 1060 (826, 1293) ng ml(-1) and C(max) mean 107 (87, 127) ng ml(-1). The mean difference in the dose-corrected AUC((0-24 h)) was 0.40% (-9.4, +10)., Conclusions: A single dose of trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole does not affect the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus in renal transplant patients.

Aim and Background: The pharmacokinetic interaction between sirolimus, a macrolide immunosuppressant metabolized by CYP3A4, and the calcium channel blocker diltiazem was studied in 18 healthy subjects. Several clinically important interactions have previously been reported for other immunosuppressive drugs that are metabolized by the same enzyme and for calcium antagonists., Methods: Healthy subjects who were 20 to 43 years old participated in an open, three-period, randomized, crossover study of the pharmacokinetics of a single 10-mg oral dose of sirolimus, a single oral 120-mg dose of diltiazem, and the two drugs given together. The three study periods were separated by a 21-day washout phase., Results: The geometric mean (90% confidence interval) whole blood sirolimus area under the plasma concentration time-curve increased 60% (35%-90%), from 736 to 1178 ng x h/mL, and maximum concentration increased 43% (14%-81%), from 67 to 96 ng/mL, with diltiazem coadministration, whereas the mean elimination half-life of sirolimus decreased slightly, from 79 to 67 hours. Apparent oral clearance and volume of distribution of sirolimus decreased with 38% and 45%, respectively, when sirolimus was given with diltiazem. The plasma maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of diltiazem, desacetyldiltiazem, and desmethyldiltiazem were unchanged after coadministration of sirolimus, and no potentiation of the effects of diltiazem on diastolic or systolic blood pressure or on the electrocardiographic parameters was seen., Conclusions: Single-dose diltiazem coadministration leads to higher sirolimus exposure, presumably by inhibition of the first-pass metabolism of sirolimus. Because of the pronounced intersubject variability in the extent of the sirolimus-diltiazem interaction, whole blood sirolimus concentrations should be monitored closely in patients treated with the two drugs.

A phase I study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of sirolimus, a new immunosuppressive drug, in 45 healthy men between 19 and 36 years of age. Nine subjects in each group were randomly assigned to receive single oral doses of either sirolimus (n = 6) or placebo (n = 3) in group I (0.3 mg/m2), group II (1 mg/m2), group III (3 mg/m2), group IV (5 mg/m2) and group V (8 mg/m2). No serious adverse events occurred during the study. Twenty-eight of the 45 volunteers (62%) reported an adverse event; 19 of 30 (63%) were in the sirolimus group and 9 of 15 (60%) were in the placebo group (ns). Asthenia was the most common adverse event, occurring in 7 of 30 (23%) in the sirolimus group compared with 6 of 15 (40%) in the placebo group (ns). Absorption occurred within 1 hour in all volunteers. Whole blood peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve increased proportionally with dose. Mean (+/- SD) whole blood terminal disposition half-life (t1/2), apparent oral dose clearance (Cl/F), and volume of distribution (Vss/F) were 82 +/- 12 hours, 278 +/- 117 mL/h x kg and 23 +/- 10 L/kg, respectively. Distribution of sirolimus into formed blood elements was extensive, with a mean whole blood-to-plasma ratio of 36. Single oral doses of sirolimus (0.3 to 8 mg/m2) solution were well tolerated in healthy male volunteers.

Introduction: A previous trial in renal transplantation comparing sirolimus (rapamycin) to cyclosporine (CsA) in a triple-drug therapy regimen with azathioprine and corticosteroids found that the incidence of acute rejection was similar (approximately 40%) with a trend for better renal function with sirolimus., Methods: In 14 European centers, first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomized to receive sirolimus (n = 40) or CsA (n = 38) in an open-label design. All patients received corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day. Sirolimus and CsA were concentration controlled; trough levels of mycophenolic acid and prednisolone were also measured., Results: At 12 months, graft survival (92.5% sirolimus vs. 89.5% CsA), patient survival (97.5% sirolimus vs. 94.7% CsA), and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (27.5% sirolimus vs. 18.4% CsA) were not statistically different. The use of antibodies to treat suspected rejection episodes was also similar (7.5% sirolimus vs. 5.3% CsA). More sirolimus patients received bolus steroid therapy (20 vs. 11, P = 0.068). From month 2 onward, the calculated glomerular filtration rate was consistently higher in sirolimus-treated patients. The adverse events reported more frequently with sirolimus were thrombocytopenia (45% vs. 8%) and diarrhea (38% vs. 11%). In the CsA group, increased creatinine (18% vs. 39%), hyperuricemia (3% vs. 18%), cytomegalovirus infection (5% vs. 21%), and tremor (5% vs. 21%) were observed significantly more often., Discussion: Patient and graft survival and the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months were comparable between sirolimus and CsA, whereas safety profiles were different. These data suggest that sirolimus may be used as primary therapy for the prevention of acute rejection.

A reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the simultaneous determination of mycophenolic acid and its metabolite, mycophenolic acid glucuronide, is presented herein. Sample purification is limited to protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The analytes were separated on a C18 column with a mobile phase containing 30% acetonitrile and a 40 mm phosphoric acid buffer at pH 2.1 and measured with UV-detection at 215 nm.