Search

We previously demonstrated that a subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with concurrent RAS pathway and TP53 mutations have an extremely poor prognosis and that most of these TP53 mutations are missense mutations. Here, we report that, in contrast to the mixed AML and T cell malignancy that developed in [Nras.sup.G12D/+] [p53.sup.-/-] ([NP.sup.-/- ]) mice, [Nras.sup.G120/+] [p53.sup.R172H/+] ([NP.sup.mut]) mice rapidly developed inflammation-associated AML. Under the inflammatory conditions, [NP.sup.mut] hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) displayed imbalanced myelopoiesis and lymphopoiesis and mostly normal cell proliferation despite MEK/ERK hyperactivation. RNA-Seq analysis revealed that oncogenic NRAS signaling and mutant p53 synergized to establish an [NP.sup.mut]-AML transcriptome distinct from that of [NP.sup.-/-] cells. The [NP.sup.mut]-AML transcriptome showed GATA2 downregulation and elevated the expression of inflammatory genes, including those linked to NF-[kappa]B signaling. NF- [kappa]B was also upregulated in human NRAS TP53 AML. Exogenous expression of GATA2 in human [NP.sup.mut] KY821 AML cells downregulated inflammatory gene expression. Mouse and human [NP.sup.mut] AML cells were sensitive to MEK and NF- [kappa]B inhibition in vitro. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib stabilized the NF-KB-inhibitory protein iKBa, reduced inflammatory gene expression, and potentiated the survival benefit of a MEK inhibitor in [NP.sup.mut] mice. Our study demonstrates that a p53 structural mutant synergized with oncogenic NRAS to promote AML through mechanisms distinct from p53 loss., Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive and devastating hematologic malignancy characterized by the accumulation of partially differentiated myeloid blast cells ([greater than or equal to]20%) in bone marrow [...]

Although certain human genetic variants are conspicuously loss of function, decoding the impact of many variants is challenging. Previously, we described a patient with leukemia predisposition syndrome (GATA2 deficiency) with a germline GATA2 variant that inserts 9 amino acids between the 2 zinc fingers (9aa-Ins). Here, we conducted mechanistic analyses using genomic technologies and a genetic rescue system with Gata2 enhancer-mutant hematopoietic progenitor cells to compare how GATA2 and 9aa-Ins function genome-wide. Despite nuclear localization, 9aa-Ins was severely defective in occupying and remodeling chromatin and regulating transcription. Variation of the inter-zinc finger spacer length revealed that insertions were more deleterious to activation than repression. GATA2 deficiency generated a lineage-diverting gene expression program and a hematopoiesis-disrupting signaling network in progenitors with reduced granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and elevated IL-6 signaling. As insufficient GM-CSF signaling caused pulmonary alveolar proteinosis and excessive IL-6 signaling promoted bone marrow failure and GATA2 deficiency patient phenotypes, these results provide insight into mechanisms underlying GATA2-linked pathologies., Introduction In metal-binding proteins, the metal requirement to regulate protein structure/function links mechanisms governing metal homeostasis, proteome composition, and genome regulation. Hundreds of proteins harbor zinc 'fingers' that coordinate zinc [...]

Mutations in genes encoding transcription factors inactivate or generate ectopic activities to instigate pathogenesis. By disrupting hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, GATA2 germline variants create a bone marrow failure and leukemia predisposition, GATA2 deficiency syndrome, yet mechanisms underlying the complex phenotypic constellation are unresolved. We used a GATA2-deficient progenitor rescue system to analyze how genetic variation influences GATA2 functions. Pathogenic variants impaired, without abrogating, GATA2-dependent transcriptional regulation. Variants promoted eosinophil and repressed monocytic differentiation without regulating mast cell and erythroid differentiation. While GATA2 and T354M required the DNA-binding C-terminal zinc finger, T354M disproportionately required the N-terminal finger and N terminus. GATA2 and T354M activated a CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein-e (C/EBPe) enhancer, creating a feedforward loop operating with the T-cell Acute Lymphocyte Leukemia-1 (TAL1) transcription factor. Elevating C/EBPe partially normalized hematopoietic defects of GATA2-deficient progenitors. Thus, pathogenic germline variation discriminatively spares or compromises transcription factor attributes, and retaining an obligate enhancer mechanism distorts a multilineage differentiation program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development and function of stem and progenitor cells that produce blood cells are vital in physiology. GATA-binding protein 2 (GATA2) mutations cause GATA-2 deficiency syndrome involving immunodeficiency, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute myeloid leukemia. GATA-2 physiological activities necessitate that it be strictly regulated, and cell type-specific enhancers fulfill this role. The +9.5 intronic enhancer harbors multiple conserved c/s-elements, and germline mutations of these c/s-elements are pathogenic in humans. Since mechanisms underlying how GATA2 enhancer disease mutations impact hematopoiesis and pathology are unclear, we generated mouse models of the enhancer mutations. While a multi-motif mutant was embryonically lethal, a single-nucleotide Ets motif mutant was viable, and steady-state hematopoiesis was normal. However, the Ets motif mutation abrogated stem/progenitor cell regeneration following stress. These results reveal a new mechanism in human genetics, in which a disease predisposition mutation inactivates enhancer regenerative activity, while sparing developmental activity. Mutational sensitization to stress that instigates hematopoietic failure constitutes a paradigm for GATA-2 deficiency syndrome and other contexts of GATA-2-dependent pathogenesis., Introduction Development of the hematopoietic system involves massive genome remodeling and the establishment of complex genetic networks. The transcription factor GATA-binding protein 2 (GATA-2) establishes and maintains genetic networks governing [...]

The initiation and evolution of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are driven by genomic events that disrupt multiple genes controlling hematopoiesis. Human genetic studies have discovered germline mutations in single genes that instigate familial MDS/AML. The best understood of these genes encode transcription factors, such as GATA-2, RUNX1, ETV6, and C/EBP[alpha], which establish and maintain genetic networks governing the genesis and function of blood stem and progenitor cells. Many questions remain unanswered regarding how genes and circuits within these networks function in physiology and disease and whether network integrity is exquisitely sensitive to or efficiently buffered from perturbations. In familial MDS/AML, mutations change the coding sequence of a gene to generate a mutant protein with altered activity or introduce frameshifts or stop codons or disrupt regulatory elements to alter protein expression. Each mutation has the potential to exert quantitatively and qualitatively distinct influences on networks. Consistent with this mechanistic diversity, disease onset is unpredictable and phenotypic variability can be considerable. Efforts to elucidate mechanisms and forge prognostic and therapeutic strategies must therefore contend with a spectrum of patient-specific leukemogenic scenarios. Here we illustrate mechanistic advances in our understanding of familial MDS/AML syndromes caused by germline mutations of hematopoietic transcription factors., Introduction High-throughput sequencing has revolutionized molecular medicine. In hematology, genomic technologies have unveiled the complex genomic landscape of blood pathologies including myelodys-plastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (1-3). [...]

In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field.