Search

Supplementary Tables S1-S4 and Figures S1-S3. Tables S1/S2: % tumor response in mice with HCT116 and A2058 tumor xenografts following treatment; Table S3: Diagram showing dose-decision guidelines utilized in the MK-2206 clinical study based on observed toxicities; Table S4: number of patients with drug-related AEs in all courses of treatment; Figure S1/S2: Line graph showing the relative tumor volume and body weight observed in patients over time expressed in terms of days following treatment; Figure S3: Patient presenting with Grade III rash

Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical relevance of the dual-targeting strategy involving PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MEK/ERK pathways.Experimental Design: We investigated safety, efficacy, and correlations between tumor genetic alterations and clinical benefit in 236 patients with advanced cancers treated with phase I study drugs targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and/or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways in our Phase I Clinical Trials Program.Results: Seventy-six (32.2%) patients received a PI3K pathway inhibitor in combination with a MAPK pathway inhibitor (D), whereas 124 (52.5%) and 36 (15.3%), respectively, received an inhibitor of either the PI3K or MAPK pathways (S). The rates of drug-related grade >III adverse events were 18.1% for (S) and 53.9% for (D; P < 0.001); the rates of dose-limiting toxicities were 9.4% for (S) and 18.4% for (D; P = 0.06). The most frequent grade >III adverse events were transaminase elevations, skin rash, and mucositis. In our comprehensive tumor genomic analysis, of 9 patients who harbored coactivation of both pathways (colorectal cancer, n = 7; melanoma, n = 2), all 5 patients treated with (D) had tumor regression ranging from 2% to 64%.Conclusions: These results suggest that dual inhibition of both pathways may potentially exhibit favorable efficacy compared with inhibition of either pathway, at the expense of greater toxicity. Furthermore, this parallel pathway targeting strategy may be especially important in patients with coexisting PI3K pathway genetic alterations and KRAS or BRAF mutations and suggests that molecular profiling and matching patients with combinations of these targeted drugs will need to be investigated in depth. Clin Cancer Res; 18(8); 2316–25. ©2012 AACR.

CCR Translation for This Article from The Clinical Effect of the Dual-Targeting Strategy Involving PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/MEK/ERK Pathways in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Purpose: KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in human tumors. KRAS-mutant cells may exhibit resistance to the allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) and allosteric AKT inhibitors (such as MK-2206), the combination of which may overcome resistance to both monotherapies.Experimental Design: We conducted a dose/schedule-finding study evaluating MK-2206 and selumetinib in patients with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors. Recommended dosing schedules were defined as MK-2206 at 135 mg weekly and selumetinib at 100 mg once daily.Results: Grade 3 rash was the most common dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); other DLTs included grade 4 lipase increase, grade 3 stomatitis, diarrhea, and fatigue, and grade 3 and grade 2 retinal pigment epithelium detachment. There were no meaningful pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. Clinical antitumor activity included RECIST 1.0–confirmed partial responses in non–small cell lung cancer and low-grade ovarian carcinoma.Conclusion: Responses in KRAS-mutant cancers were generally durable. Clinical cotargeting of MEK and AKT signaling may be an important therapeutic strategy in KRAS-driven human malignancies (Trial NCT number NCT01021748). Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 739–48. ©2014 AACR.

Purpose: KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in human tumors. KRAS-mutant cells may exhibit resistance to the allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) and allosteric AKT inhibitors (such as MK-2206), the combination of which may overcome resistance to both monotherapies. Experimental Design: We conducted a dose/schedule-finding study evaluating MK-2206 and selumetinib in patients with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors. Recommended dosing schedules were defined as MK-2206 at 135 mg weekly and selumetinib at 100 mg once daily. Results: Grade 3 rash was the most common dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); other DLTs included grade 4 lipase increase, grade 3 stomatitis, diarrhea, and fatigue, and grade 3 and grade 2 retinal pigment epithelium detachment. There were no meaningful pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. Clinical antitumor activity included RECIST 1.0–confirmed partial responses in non–small cell lung cancer and low-grade ovarian carcinoma. Conclusion: Responses in KRAS-mutant cancers were generally durable. Clinical cotargeting of MEK and AKT signaling may be an important therapeutic strategy in KRAS-driven human malignancies (Trial NCT number NCT01021748). Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 739–48. ©2014 AACR.

2594Background: We have developed a unique strategy to tactically reduce on-target platelet toxicity with APG-1252, a novel dual Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor, while maintaining strong in vivo antitumor a...

Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical relevance of the dual-targeting strategy involving PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MEK/ERK pathways. Experimental Design: We investigated safety, efficacy, and correlations between tumor genetic alterations and clinical benefit in 236 patients with advanced cancers treated with phase I study drugs targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and/or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways in our Phase I Clinical Trials Program. Results: Seventy-six (32.2%) patients received a PI3K pathway inhibitor in combination with a MAPK pathway inhibitor (D), whereas 124 (52.5%) and 36 (15.3%), respectively, received an inhibitor of either the PI3K or MAPK pathways (S). The rates of drug-related grade >III adverse events were 18.1% for (S) and 53.9% for (D; P < 0.001); the rates of dose-limiting toxicities were 9.4% for (S) and 18.4% for (D; P = 0.06). The most frequent grade >III adverse events were transaminase elevations, skin rash, and mucositis. In our comprehensive tumor genomic analysis, of 9 patients who harbored coactivation of both pathways (colorectal cancer, n = 7; melanoma, n = 2), all 5 patients treated with (D) had tumor regression ranging from 2% to 64%. Conclusions: These results suggest that dual inhibition of both pathways may potentially exhibit favorable efficacy compared with inhibition of either pathway, at the expense of greater toxicity. Furthermore, this parallel pathway targeting strategy may be especially important in patients with coexisting PI3K pathway genetic alterations and KRAS or BRAF mutations and suggests that molecular profiling and matching patients with combinations of these targeted drugs will need to be investigated in depth. Clin Cancer Res; 18(8); 2316–25. ©2012 AACR.

Purpose To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and evidence of antitumor activity of AMG 479, a fully human monoclonal antibody to insulin-like growth factor receptor 1 (IGF-1R). Patients and Methods Patients with advanced solid malignancies or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received escalating doses of AMG 479 intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks (Q2W). Blood samples were assayed to determine pharmacokinetic parameters and IGF-1R occupancy on neutrophils; fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography scans were used to assess tumor metabolic effects. Results Fifty-three patients received 312 infusions of AMG 479 Q2W. Overall, the most common grades 1 to 2 toxicities were fatigue, thrombocytopenia, fever, rash, chills, and anorexia. One dose-limiting toxicity (ie, grade 3 thrombocytopenia) occurred in a patient at 20 mg/kg during course 1; grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 8) and grade 3 transaminitis elevations (n = 1) also were reported but not in the escalation phase. The maximum-planned dose of 20 mg/kg was safely administered; thus, an MTD was not reached. High levels of neutrophil IGF-1R binding and increases from baseline in serum IGF-1 levels were observed in the 12- and 20-mg/kg cohorts. Tumor responses included one durable complete response (CR) and one unconfirmed partial response (PR) in two patients with Ewing/primitive neuroectodermal tumors and included one PR and one minor response in two patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The patients with Ewing/PNET who had a CR have remained disease free on therapy after 28 months. Conclusion AMG 479 can be administered safely at 20 mg/kg IV Q2W. The absence of severe toxicities, attainment of serum concentrations associated with high levels of IGF-1R binding on neutrophils, and provocative antitumor activity warrant additional studies of this agent.

e13509 Background: Targeted therapy of recurrent/metastatic ovarian and endometrial cancer remains of great interest but has not been established as standard of care. We analyzed a series of patien...

Background Frequent coactivation of both PI3K/AKT and RAS/MEK pathways has been seen in a number of different tumor types. Preclinical studies also provide a clear rationale for the co-inhibition of these frequently-activated, semi-parallel pathways. Methods We reviewed the records of 1672 consecutive advanced cancer patients in our phase I clinical trials program and investigated the clinical impact of simultaneous blockade of both PI3K/AKT and RAS/MEK pathways in patients with oncogenic alterations in both signaling pathways from 317 patients who received PI3K pathway inhibitor and/or MAPK pathway inhibitor. Results Of 317 patients, 163 (51.4%) were tested for tumor genomic analysis using DNA array-based CGH/PCR-based DNA sequencing. PI3K pathway genetic alterations were detected in 29 of the 163 (17.8%) patients. RAS/RAF pathway genetic alterations were detected in 43 of the 163 (26.4%) patients. Simultaneous oncogenic alterations in both PI3K/AKT and RAS/MEK pathways were detected in 12 patients (colorectal cancer, n = 7; pancreatic cancer, n = 2; melanoma, n = 2; non-seminomatous germ cell tumor, n = 1). Six of the eight (75%) patients treated with personalized treatment based on dual pathways inhibition had tumor regression with prolonged duration of time to treatment failure compared with that of patients treated with single pathway inhibition. A patient with pancreatic cancer harboring simultaneous KRAS mutation and AKT2 amplification treated with combination MEK inhibitor and AKT inhibitor showed central cavitations of numerous lung metastatic lesions along with a decrease in CA19-9, which may reflect treatment effect. Conclusions These data could serve as a platform for therapeutic decision-making. The strategy of targeting parallel pathways may be especially important in patients with coexisting PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathway genetic alterations. The data also suggest the need to further investigate the role of molecular profiling and matching patients with targeted drugs for personalized treatment.

e13025 Background: Frequent coactivation of both PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways has been seen in a number of different tumor types. Preclinical studies also provide a clear rationale for the co-inhibition of these, "semi-parallel" pathways. Methods: We reviewed the records of 1,672 consecutive advanced cancer patients (pts) in our Phase I Clinical Trials Program and investigated the clinical impact of simultaneous blockade of both PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways in patients with oncogenic alterations in both signaling pathways from 317 pts who received PI3K pathway inhibitor and/or MAPK pathway inhibitor. Results: 163 of 317 pts (51.4%) were tested for comprehensive tumor genomic analysis using DNA array-based CGH/PCR-based DNA sequencing. PI3K pathway genetic alterations (PIK3CA mutation, n=3; PTEN deletion, n=18; AKT amplification, n=10) were detected in 29 of the 163 (17.8%) pts. RAS/RAF pathway genetic alterations (KRAS mutation, n=33; HRAS mutation, n=4; BRAF mutation, n=6) were detected in 43 of the 163 (26.4%) pts. Simultaneous oncogenic alterations in both PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways were detected in 12 pts (colorectal cancer, n=7; pancreatic cancer, n=2; melanoma, n=2; non-seminomatous germ cell tumor, n=1). Six of 8 (75%) pts treated with personalized treatment based on dual pathways inhibition had tumor regression with prolonged duration of time to treatment failure compared to that of pts treated with single pathway inhibition. A pt with pancreatic cancer harboring simultaneous KRAS mutation and AKT2 amplification treated with combination MEK1/2 inhibitor and AKT inhibitor showed central cavitations of numerous lung metastatic lesions along with a decrease in CA19-9, which may reflect treatment effect. Conclusions: These data could serve as a platform for therapeutic decision making. The strategy of targeting parallel pathways may be especially important in pts with coexisting PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathway genetic alterations. The data also suggest the need to further investigate the role of molecular profiling and matching pts with targeted drugs for personalized treatment.

2502 Background: The dual targeting strategy involving PI3K and MAPK pathways is compelling, as it has become increasingly clear that both pathways are interconnected. Nevertheless, the clinical im...

Background There is a clinical need for routinely available genomic biomarker testing in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. In the current study we performed molecular cytogenetics using a validated array based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) assay to screen for the presence of predictive and prognostic biomarkers in archival diagnostic tissue from ovarian cancer patients. We hypothesized that biomarkers of high-risk disease would be detectable in tumor samples from patients with treatment refractory, advanced disease, and would be detected less frequently in tumor samples from patients with more favorable outcomes. In addition, we predicted that the use of a genome-wide copy number analysis (CNA) testing platform would enable us to identify novel potentially targetable chromosomal alterations of therapeutic significance in a percentage of cases. Methods Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPE) tumor bank specimens were retrieved from the initial surgical resection for 18 ovarian cancer patients. Molecular cytogenetics was performed by array CGH for the detection of somatic chromosomal alterations associated with high-risk disease including amplifications of the CCNE1 and HER2 genes. Genomic risk stratification results were correlated with available clinical data. CGH data from each patient’s tumor genome was also surveyed for the presence of potentially targetable aberrations. Relevant therapeutic agents and open studies for investigational drugs were reported for each patient. Results High-risk genomic alterations were identified in 12/18 (67%) of cases and all patients with high-risk markers had advanced, treatment refractory disease. Three tumors with minimal genomic changes had no high-risk markers and were from patients with Stage I/II disease that had been completely resected and under surveillance for recurrence. Eleven patients (61%) had at least one potentially targetable genomic alteration including CCNE1, HER2, KRAS gene amplifications, and somatic BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 gene deletions. Bi-allelic PTEN gene deletion was detected in one patient’s tumor. Conclusions Clinical genomic profiling of ovarian tumors by array CGH augments pathologic grade and stage to help stratify newly diagnosed ovarian cancer into high and low-risk disease. This personalized genomic information can also help guide treatment planning and disease monitoring by identifying novel potentially targetable genomic alterations that can be used by clinicians to choose rational directed therapies for patients with chemo-resistant disease.