1. Surgical management and outcome of newly diagnosed glioblastoma without contrast enhancement (low-grade appearance):a report of the RANO resect group
- Author
-
Karschnia, P, Dietrich, J, Bruno, F, Dono, A, Juenger, ST, Teske, N, Young, JS, Sciortino, T, Häni, L, van den Bent, M, Weller, M, Vogelbaum, MA, Morshed, RA, Haddad, AF, Molinaro, AM, Tandon, N, Beck, J, Schnell, O, Bello, L, Hervey-Jumper, S, Thon, N, Grau, SJ, Esquenazi, Y, Rudà, R, Chang, SM, Berger, MS, Cahill, DP, Tonn, JC, Karschnia, P, Dietrich, J, Bruno, F, Dono, A, Juenger, ST, Teske, N, Young, JS, Sciortino, T, Häni, L, van den Bent, M, Weller, M, Vogelbaum, MA, Morshed, RA, Haddad, AF, Molinaro, AM, Tandon, N, Beck, J, Schnell, O, Bello, L, Hervey-Jumper, S, Thon, N, Grau, SJ, Esquenazi, Y, Rudà, R, Chang, SM, Berger, MS, Cahill, DP, and Tonn, JC
- Abstract
Background Resection of the contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor represents the standard of care in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. However, some tumors ultimately diagnosed as glioblastoma lack contrast enhancement and have a ‘low-grade appearance’ on imaging (non-CE glioblastoma). We aimed to (a) volumetrically define the value of non-CE tumor resection in the absence of contrast enhancement, and to (b) delineate outcome differences between glioblastoma patients with and without contrast enhancement. Methods The RANO resect group retrospectively compiled a global, eight-center cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. The associations between postoperative tumor volumes and outcome were analyzed. Propensity score-matched analyses were constructed to compare glioblastomas with and without contrast enhancement. Results Among 1323 newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, we identified 98 patients (7.4%) without contrast enhancement. In such patients, smaller postoperative tumor volumes were associated with more favorable outcome. There was an exponential increase in risk for death with larger residual non-CE tumor. Accordingly, extensive resection was associated with improved survival compared to lesion biopsy. These findings were retained on a multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic and clinical markers. Compared to CE glioblastoma, patients with non-CE glioblastoma had a more favorable clinical profile and superior outcome as confirmed in propensity score analyses by matching the patients with non-CE glioblastoma to patients with CE glioblastoma using a large set of clinical variables. Conclusions The absence of contrast enhancement characterizes a less aggressive clinical phenotype of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Maximal resection of non-CE tumors has prognostic implications and translates into favorable outcome.
- Published
- 2024