Search

Introduction: According to reports from China and Europe, there are various clinical and laboratory risk factors that associate with both death and the use of a ventilator in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In Wuhan, blood type A was related to these complications, but this factor is unknown for Latin America. Objective was to describe the association of blood type with complications related to COVID-19 infection. Material and methods: A retrospective comparative study from the clinical files of patients cared for in the emergency department between April and May 2020. Results: Data was analyzed from 120 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. There were no differences in age and gender by blood type. Type O was the most frequent (80.8%) followed by type A (11.7%) and type B (7.5%). In univariate analysis, there was no impact of blood type on survival, individually (groups A, B, O) (log rank 0.154). In multivariate analysis, only age influenced prognosis ( p =0.004). Above the risk, type O showed no impact on mortality (OR 1.0119, 95% CI: 0.3898–2.6272, p =0.980) or ventilator use (1.5616, 95% CI: 0.4834–5.0453, p =0.456), likewise for types A and B (OR 0.9882, 95% CI, 0.3806–2.5657). Conclusion: Blood type does not impact prognosis in Mexican patients with COVID-19.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) comprises a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic cell neoplasms of myeloid lineage that arise from the clonal expansion of their precursors in the bone marrow, interfering with cell differentiation, leading to a syndrome of bone marrow failure. AML is a consequence of genetic and epigenetic changes (point mutations, gene rearrangements, deletions, amplifications, and arrangements in epigenetic changes that influence gene expression) in hematopoietic precursor cells, which create a clone of abnormal cells that are capable of proliferating but cannot differentiate into mature hematopoietic cells or undergo programmed cell death. The diagnosis requires more than 20% myeloid blasts in the bone marrow and certain cytogenic abnormalities. Treatment will depend on age, comorbidities, and cytogenetic risk among the most frequent.La leucemia mieloide aguda (LMA) comprende un grupo heterogéneo de neoplasias de células hematopoyéticas de linaje mieloide que surgen de la expansión clonal de sus precursores en la médula ósea, interfiriendo con la diferenciación celular, lo que conlleva a un síndrome de falla medular. La LMA es una consecuencia de cambios genéticos y epigenéticos (mutaciones puntuales, rearreglos de genes, deleciones, amplificaciones y arreglos en cambios epigenéticos que influyen en la expression del gen) en las células hematopoyéticas precursoras, la cual crea una clona de células anormales que son capaces de proliferar, pero no se pueden diferenciar en células hematopoyéticas maduras ni sufrir una muerte celular programada. El diagnostic requiere más del 20% de blastos mieloides en médula ósea y ciertas anormalidades citogénicas. El tratamiento dependerá de la edad, comorbilidades, riesgo citogenético entre las más frecuentes.

PURPOSE The COVID-19 pandemic is a colossal challenge for global health; nonetheless, specific subgroups face considerably higher risks for infection and mortality. Among patients with malignant diseases, those with hematologic neoplasms are at a higher risk for poor outcomes. The objective of this study was to register treatment modifications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and their short-term consequences in Latin America. METHODS Multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study including patients older than 14 years from 14 centers in four countries (Mexico, Peru, Guatemala, and Panama) who had a confirmed diagnosis of acute leukemia, and who were undergoing active treatment since the first COVID-19 case in each country until the cutoff on July 15, 2020. RESULTS We recruited 635 patients. Treatment modifications because of the COVID-19 pandemic were reported in 40.8% of cases. The main reason for such modifications was logistic issues (55.0%) and the most frequent modification was chemotherapy delay (42.0%). A total of 13.1% patients developed COVID-19 disease, with a mortality of 37.7%. Several factors were identified as independently associated with mortality, including a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (odds ratio 2.38 [95% CI, 1.47 to 3.84]; P < .001), while the use of telemedicine was identified as a protective factor (odds ratio 0.36 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.82]; P = .014). CONCLUSION These results highlight the collateral damage of COVID-19 in oncology patients.

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire world. Health systems have been affected in such a way that patients with diseases other than COVID-19 have suffered serious consequences. In Latin America, the disease has emerged in a fragile system with more disparities, making our patients more vulnerable. Acute leukemia patients have a high risk of severe COVID-19 disease. Various expert recommendations have emerged with the aim of minimizing the risk of COVID-19 without affecting leukemia-related outcomes. However, multiple logistical issues tangentially associated with the pandemic have also appeared, potentially limiting the quality of management of these patients. The objective of this study was to register treatment modifications associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and its short-term consequences in Latin American countries. Methods We included patients older than 14 years, from 14 centers of 4 Latin American countries (Mexico, Peru, Guatemala and Panama), with the diagnosis of acute leukemia, who were on active treatment since the first case of COVID-19 was documented in each country. We documented their baseline characteristics and followed the patients prospectively until July 15, were data-cutoff for this pre-planned analysis was performed. The primary outcome was the incidence of COVID-19 disease and its complications. Secondary outcomes included treatment and consult modifications, and cause of death during the study period. Logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with COVID-19 and all-cause mortality. Results We recorded the information of 635 patients: 58.1% Ph-negative ALL, 25.7% AML, 9% APL and 7.2% Ph+ALL. The median age was 35 years (14-90 years); 58.8% were consideredf high-risk patients. The majority were on CR (68.3%) receiving consolidation or maintenance therapy, while 14.5% were newly diagnosed and 17.2% with relapsed/refractory disease. The majority (91.8%) were treated in centers that were also receiving COVID-19 patients, 40.2% in centers were patients could not be electively hospitalized for leukemia treatment because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-pandemic led to treatment-modifications in 40.8% of the cases. Reasons for modifications were associated with logistical issues (22.4%), medical decisions (15.1%) or patient choice (3.3%). The most frequent modification was chemotherapy delay (17.3%) followed by regimen modification (13.4%) and dose-reductions (10.1%). (Figure 1) 83 patients (13.1%) developed COVID-19 disease, the majority mild-moderate disease (54.2%), 27.7% severe disease and 18.1% critically ill; 27.7% required mechanical ventilation and 37.7% died from COVID-19 disease, representing 4.9% of the entire cohort. We identify as risk factors for COVID-19 disease the presence of active leukemia (newly diagnosed or relapsed) (OR 3.46 [95% CI: 2.16-5.5], p On the other hand, 16.7% of patients died during period analyzed due to leukemia (57.5%), COVID-19 (29.2%) or treatment related-mortality (13.2%). Independent factors associated with mortality were AML vs. ALL (OR 1.89 [95% CI: 1.12-3.18], p=0.016), relapsed-refractory disease (OR 8.34 [95% CI: 4.83-14.41], p Discussion/Conclusions The COVID-19 pandemic led to significant modifications in the standard of care treatment of patients with acute leukemia. The incidence of COVID-19 disease in acute leukemia patients was considerable and more than a third of the patients with acute leukemia and COVID-19 disease died. Despite a short-follow up, 16.7% of the patients died and leukemia-related deaths were the most frequent. In low- and middle-income countries with fragile health systems, the collateral damage for patients with acute leukemia may be just as important as the direct consequences of COVID-19. Disclosures Alvarado: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau. De la Peña-Celaya:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Perez:Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Gomez-Almaguer:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Backgrounds: There is a few available information about Coronavirus disease- 2019 (Covid-19) behavior in Latin American countries. We aimed to evaluate the association between laboratory tests and complications risk factors in SARS-CoV-2 infection in a Mexican population. Methods: We analyzed retrospective routinely collected data for Covid-19 patients in Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Ixtapaluca, Mexico. We identify adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 and oxygen support, between March 28 and May 5, 2020. We described the demographic and clinical laboratory differences and assessed the association with complications between the outcome and potential prognosis factor using two-sided Fisher's exact test and unadjusted odds ratio calculation. Findings Between March 28, 2020, and May 5, 2020, we traced 195 adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 and oxygen support. We estimated the cases of chronic diseases, 28·4% patients had diabetes and 24·4% hypertension. Only 12·7% of the patients suffer both conditions. There was no statistical association between death, and diabetes and hypertension coexistence; (p= 0·82). Besides, we observed that patients with a BMI between 35-39·9 kg/m2 (9·2%) had a 63·6% mortality rate. Compared to the survivors´ patients, the full blood count test showed a higher median of leucocytes count in non- survivors of 11·4 per 103 mcL; (p= 800ng/ml (uOR 3·97 [95% CI 1·51 - 10·43]) and male sex (uOR 2·79 [95% CI 1·36 - 5·74]). The Kaplan- Meier estimator indicated that the mean survival time was 17·84 days. Interpretation: Mexican population reported similar demographic and clinical characteristics as observed in other countries. Contrary as we expect, diabetes was not associated with higher risk of complications in Covid-19 patients. Trial Registration: This study is part of a protocol, which is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04434157. Funding Statement: None. Declaration of Interests: All authors declare no competing interest. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the institutional Research and Ethics Committee at HRAEI (protocol NR-09-2020). The required informed consent was waived because of the study design.

Background: Mexico and Central America have a high incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Chemotherapy with Hyper-CVAD has been widely used with poor outcomes, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 25.7% in this group of age. In low-and middle-income countries (LMIC), limitations in supportive care such as low access to neutrophil stimulant agents, antifungal prophylaxis and limited intensive care access, may increase treatment-related mortality. On the other hand, reports suggest that specific high-risk subgroups may be more frequent in Hispanic patients from Mexico and Central America. We hypothesize that the use of a less-myeloablative regimen, based on L-asparaginase could overcome the bad outcomes previously reported. Methods We modified the original CALGB 10403 based on local drug-access. We include patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative B- or T-cell ALL between 14-49 years from 4 centers in Mexico and one in Guatemala. We modified the regimen as following: replaced pegaspargase by E. Coli asparaginase, thioguanine by 6-mercapatopurine and incorporate rituximab 375mg/m2 for 6 doses in CD20 positive patients. After the first interim analysis (October 2019), we replaced the prednisone by dexamethasone during induction. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by flow cytometry after induction and after first consolidation. We considered high-risk karyotype if MLL-rearrangements, complex or hypodiploid and high-white blood cell count (WBC) if >30 x10 3/mcL for B-ALL or >100 x10 3/mcL for T-ALL. The main objective was to evaluate OS and as secondary objectives to evaluate complete response (CR) rate, relapse-free survival (RFS) and to assess the safety of this regimen. Results From January 2017 to December 2020, 95 patients have been enrolled with a median age of 23 years (range 14-49). One third (34.6%) had overweight and 11.7% were obese. The majority (92.6%) had a B-cell ALL and a normal karyotype (81.2%). The median WBC was 18.4 x10 3/mcL (0.2-427.7) and 40.9% had a high-WBC. During induction, adverse events (AE) included grade 3/4 elevated bilirubin (21.1%), transaminases (14.7%), hyperglycemia (14.7%), hypofibrinogenemia (44.2%), thrombosis (10.5%), hypersensitivity (2.2%) and pancreatitis (2.1%). During consolidation, AE included grade 3/4 hepatic toxicity (18.9%), hypertriglyceridemia (14.8%), thrombosis (5.3%) and pancreatitis (2.1%). Neutropenic fever occurred in 55.8% during induction (grade 4: 31.5%), and in 32.9% during consolidation (grade 4/5: 5.3%). A dose adjustment due to AE was required in 22.1% during induction and in 23.2% during consolidation. The induction related-mortality (IRM) rate was 7.4% The CR rate was 87.8%. After-induction, MRD was 0.1% in 24.6%. Post-consolidation MRD was only measured in 43 patients and was The 2-year OS was 72.1%. The post-induction MRD The 2-year RFS was 65.2%. The post-induction MRD Conclusions: The adoption of modified CALGB10403 regimen in Central America based on local resources is feasible. It is associated with a significant improvement in the OS and decrease in IRM when compared with previous reports. Despite a very high-rate of hepatic and metabolic toxicities, these were manageable. As reported by other groups, MRD, high-WBC and overweight/obesity are associated with poor outcomes. Despite being encouraging results, a significant number of patients persist with positive MRD and the main cause of dead is disease progression. Access to cellular therapies, and BiTes is cost restricted in LMIC. Hence, we should generate strategies to intensify treatment in MRD positive patients and expand transplant access to overcome outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Rangel-Patiño: Bristol: Consultancy; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Ceniceros: Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Espinosa: Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Amador: Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy. Cabrero Garcia: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy; BD: Speakers Bureau. Inclan-Alarcon: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Boehringer: Speakers Bureau. Neme Yunes: Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bristol: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Meillon-García: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy. Apodaca: Sanofi: Consultancy; Asofarma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Speakers Bureau. Demichelis: Bristol/Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; ASH: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy.

Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents 51% of acute leukemias in adults in Mexico. Poor outcomes have been reported, with a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 25.7% in the group of adolescents and young adults (AYA). In ALL, Hispanic ethnicity has been associated with more high-risk features and more treatment-related toxicity. Recently the results of the pediatric-inspired regimen CALGB 10403 in AYA ALL-patients have been published with encouraging results. We modified the original regimen based on the drug-access in Mexico and we incorporate Rituximab in CD20 positive patients. Methods We included patients with newly diagnosed B- or T-cell ALL between 17 and 45 years. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome-ALL were excluded. We enrolled patients from 4 centers in Mexico. We replicated the CALGB 10403 protocol, with the following modifications: replaced pegaspargase (2,500 IU/m2) with E. Coli asparaginase (6,000 IU/m2/day for 6 doses in alternate days). During the delayed intensification we replaced thioguanine 60mg/m2/day with 6-mercapatopurine 60mg/m2/day. We incorporated rituximab 375mg/m2 at D1 and D29 during remission consolidation, D1 and D21 in interim maintenance and D1, D29 and D50 in delayed intensification. The central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis was given as a triple-drug (methotrexate 12.5mg, cytarabine 60mg and dexamethasone 8mg), with a total of 11 intratecal administrations, 7 during the induction/consolidation courses and 4 during maintenance. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by flow cytometry after induction and after first consolidation. The aims of this study were to evaluate complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and to assess the safety of this regimen. Result From January 2017 to May 2019 thirty-eight patients (23 men, 15 women) have been enrolled. Median follow-up is 11 months (range 1-30). Median age is 23 years (range 18-41). The 100% of patients are of Hispanic ethnicity. Obesity (BMI≥30) was reported in 18%. Thirty patients had an evaluable karyotype: 83% were normal, and 13% with MLL-rearrangements. The majority were B-cell ALL (90%), and 10% were T-cell ALL. Median WBC was 19.5 x103/mcL (range: 0.7-427.7) and 32% had hyperleukocytosis. Among the B-cell ALL patients, 53% were CD20 positive. CNS disease was presented at diagnosis in only one patient (3%). Thirty-three patients (86%) achieved CR, thirty (81%) after the first induction and three after the extended induction therapy. There was only one death during induction therapy (2.6%). After induction, 41% had negative MRD ( Grade 3 /4 hepatic toxicity was reported in 58% patients, hyperglycemia in 24% and hypertriglyceridemia in 34%. The rest of toxicities are summarized in Table 1. During induction ten patients (19%) required dose adjustment because of toxicity. During consolidation, 42% required treatment modifications because of toxicity. After induction, we had no treatment-related mortality. At the last follow-up twenty-three patients continue in the protocol. Four patients already received Allo-SCT. The relapse-rate is 31.2% with half of these patients with CNS-disease at relapse. Nine patients have died: one during induction, six with progression or refractory disease and one after Allo-SCT. The 18-months PFS and OS rates were 80% and 84%, respectively. Median PFS is 23 months (CI 95% 17 to 29 months), and median OS was not been reached. Negative-MRD after induction was associated with excellent outcomes: 18-months OS 100% vs. 45.3%, p=0.008 (figure 1). Obesity was associated with worse OS (18-month 22% vs. 80%, p=0.03) and PFS (22% vs. 79.1%, p=0.026) Conclusion: Mexican patients treated with a modified CALGB 10403 protocol had similar response rates than reported in the original protocol but with more toxicity, mainly hepatic and metabolic. However, induction-related mortality was low and we had no treatment-related toxicity after induction. We presume that the high-rate of toxicities can be related with the genetic and environmental metabolic risk factors plenty described in our population. The modified CALGB showed encouraging results in this Hispanic population, hence we have to explore lower dose schedule based in patient characteristics and asparaginase levels. Disclosures Neme Yunes: Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Demichelis:Abbvie: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau.

In order to assess the mortality and toxicity of the Hyper-CVAD protocol used as first-line treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia, a retrospective cohort study was performed in patients less than 40 years of age from March to September 2011 treated with Hyper-CVAD regimen. Mortality and toxicity was compared with the results of patients treated with the institutional HGMLAL07 regimen between 2009-2012. 18 patients were included; the median age was 26 years old. Complete remissions (67.7% versus 81.9%) as well as one-year (40% versus 62%) and 2 year survival rates (18% versus 34%) were lower with the Hyper-CVAD regimen. By selecting only patients younger than 35 years, the effectiveness of Hyper-CVAD was also lower. In our experience and because of its high cost and toxicity, the Hyper-CVAD regimen should be limited to patients with relapsed or refractory leukemia.

The Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) grades II-IV is present in up to 40% in Human Leucocyte Antigen (HLA) - identical related transplants and up to 80% of non-related. The HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation (BMT) has been associated with significant risks of graft rejection and severe GVHD, as an excessive alloreactivity by host and donor T cells. High dose of Cyclofosfamide (Cy) after BMT inhibits both graft rejection and GVHD. We want to share our experience in preventing GVHD in HLA - haploidentical alloBMT and HLA-matched related BMT using the strategy of Cy post-Transplant. We evaluated 25 patients from March 2013 to June 2014, all of them were in advanced stages of the disease or they have characteristics of poor prognosis before transplantation. All patients received non-myeloablative conditioning and Cyclofosfamide (Cy) 50 mg/Kg postrasplant (on days 3 and 4 after transplantation), Mycophenolate mofetil (from day 5 to 35) and Tacrolimus (from day 5 to 180). The 64% (16) were male, mean age 30.6 years (range 2 – 67 years), with a average follow-up of 198 days (range 14-512 days). The 76% (19) were HLA-matched related alloBMT (7 patients) and HLA-haploidentical alloBMT (12 patients) in hematological malignancies, the rest of trasplants (24%) were HLA-haploidentical alloBMT in benign hematological diseases, overall survival (OS) at day 180 by type of transplant was 70%, 64%, and 67% respectively. 28% (7) had graft failure. 11 patients had no acute GVHD, 10 patients had GVHD grade I-II, and 3 patients had grade III, only 1 patient died because of grade IV (P = 0.005). Chronic GVHD occurred in 4 patients (16%). As a complication related to Cy therapy, hemorrhagic cystitis was observed 32%(8). Posttransplantation cyclophosphamide is able to reduce the likelihood of developing chronic GVHD and reduces the severity of acute GVHD, it plays an important role in the feasibility of a haploidentical transplant because the lower incidence of GVHD. Our results showed one of the most satisfactory and encouraging studies on the use of post-transplantation Cy performed in Latin America. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Tolerance to oral iron and low percentage of absorption in the gut has provoked the Iron Deficiency Anemia patients (IDA) fail to treatment or they have symptoms of anemia even more than 12 weeks until recovery. Intravenous iron is an alternative to minimize risk and treatment-related adverse effects and maximize profits in the short and long term. The number of patients who have access to ferumoxytol is reduced in developing countries, therefore experience in the treatment with this type of iron is limited. Patients received ferumoxytol 1020mg (two 510mg 8 days apart) and the response at 4 weeks of treatment by raising hemoglobin and clinical response was evaluated without transfusion support. From a total of 30 patients 76.6% (19) were women of whom 36.8% (7) were postmenopausal. The average age was 45.3 years (range 21-76 years). Before starting treatment, the mean serum iron, ferritin and rate of transferrin saturation was 35.6 mcg (range 8–174 mcg/dL), 13.8 ng/mL (range 1.6–60 ng/mL), 10.8% (range 2-58%) respectively. The mean initial hemoglobin was 10.5 g / dL (range 7.1-13.7g/dL), reaching an average of 13.03 g dL (range 9.4 - 16 _g/dL) at 4 weeks, raising 2.52 g dL (0.3 - 5.4g / _ g/dL) in 28 days. The percentage of patients who achieved an increase of > 2 g/dL of hemoglobin was 70% (21). The initial symptoms attributed to anemia disappeared in 66.6% within the first 2 weeks and the rest in 4-5 weeks. Adverse effects more frequently than 2%: fatigue 16.6% (5), headache 10% (3), nausea and dizziness 10% (3), peripheral edema 6.6% (2) and hypersensitivity 3.3% (1). All previous were easily controlled with medications. Despite the low number of patients treated due to the difficult accessibility of the drug in our population, ferumoxytol was shown to be an attractive option that rapidly improves symptoms with a satisfactory safety profile. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Drug resistance is a major obstacle in the successful treatment and an important cause of death in acute leukemia. One of the well-known genes responsable for drug resistance are ABC-B1 and ABC-G2. The association of transcript levels with survival outcome has not systematically been investigated in mexican adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. We therefore applied real-time RT-PCR technology to study the association between the ABC-B1 and ABC-G2 genes with overall survival in mexican adults leukemia patients. A total of 36 patients were analyzed at diagnosis and followed for 25 months to assess their development and survival. The 57% were female, mean age at diagnosis was 33.5 years (19-78 years), 60% of patients were positive for gene expression ABC-B1 and 78% for ABC-G2. When performing quantitative analysis of ABC-B1 expression, those with high levels (> 1.0) had worse clinical behavior (P = 0.007) and death (P = Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Targeted therapy commenced against Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) with the development of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), since its approval in 2001 as first-line therapy, imatinib has been effective in achieving high response rates and improving the prognosis. However, the excellent results of large clinical trials are not entirely reproducible in the “real world”, we want to share our experience of a decade of use as front-line treatment. A total of 160 patients with previously untreated CML since 2002 were reviewed: 90% chronic phase (CP), 7% accelerated phase (AP), and 3% blast phase (BP). All were treated with standard-dose imatinib. In CP, overall survival (OS) at 75 months was 82% and progression-free survival 66%(PFS). Survival was worse in those over 60 years (P= < .001). 40% achieved and maintained Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR), 19 patients progressed to BP. 23.4% had some degree of hematologic toxicity that required a temporary suspension or reduction of the initial dose. 26.8% of patients with chronic phase treated at our institution were in the high EUTOS score. In this population, the EUTOS score was not predictive for outcome. Our study showed that imatinib is effective, and well tolerated by our patients and remains as a good strategy used as first-line therapy for patients with CML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.