Search

INTRODUCTION Three-dimensional (3-D) CT volumetric filling ratio (VFR) is a better predictor of proximal humerus stress shielding after short-stem anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) than using plain radiographs. METHODS Forty-four patients with short-stem aTSAs, preoperative CT scans, and a minimum 3-year radiographic follow-up were included. Patients were divided into group A (stress shielding) and group B (no stress shielding) based on the radiographic analysis. Standard implant filling ratios were measured on plain radiographs. The 3-D VFR of the metaphyseal and diaphyseal segments of the aTSA stem was measured using MIMICS (Materialise). The area under a receiver operator characteristic curve was used to determine the predictive strength of the 3-D VFR method. RESULTS The average age and radiographic follow-up was 69 years and 44 months. Group A had 19 patients and statistically higher filling ratios using 3-D VFR method than group B, whereas no notable differences were found between the groups using standard techniques. The 3-D VFR had an area under a receiver operator characteristic curve of 92%, which supports it as a good predictor of stress shielding. CONCLUSIONS These methods enable early identification of patients at risk for stress shielding and can also be valuable in improving humeral stem designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III. Case-control study.

To measure the multiaxial stability of the acromioclavicular joint before and after transection of the acromioclavicular capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments and after sequential repair of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments.Biomechanical testing was performed on fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders (N = 6). Translational and rotational stability in the vertical and horizontal planes was measured in intact specimens, after transecting the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments, and after sequentially performing the following procedures: single-bundle coracoclavicular repair (CCR), modified Weaver-Dunn procedure (WD), and acromioclavicular stabilization (ACS).Resecting the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular significantly reduced translational stiffness in the inferior and anteroposterior directions, as well as rotational stiffness about the vertical and anteroposterior axes. All 3 surgical procedures increased inferior translational stiffness relative to the intact condition (Intact: 38 ± 9 N/mm, CCR: 54 ± 23 N/mm (P = .03), CCR+WD 52 ± 20 N/mm (P = .07), CCR ± WD+ACS 50 ± 21 N/mm (P = .17)). However, the combination of CCR, modified WD, and ACS resulted in the greatest increase in stiffness in internal rotation (Intact: 12.5 ± 7.4 cNm/deg, CCR: 1.2 ± 1.1 cNm/deg, CCR+WD 7.2 ± 3.0 N∗m/deg [P = .023], CCR+WD+ACS 11.6 ± 4.9 cNm/deg [P = .055]).The cumulative stability of CCR, WD reconstruction, and ACS appears to be additive. Our findings provide a biomechanical justification for combining all three techniques. Biomechanical studies assessing the performance of various acromioclavicular repairs and reconstructions should therefore incorporate multiaxial testing in their protocols.Multiple points of fixation that provide multidirectional stability have the potential to improve clinical outcomes and reduce failure rates of acromioclavicular joint repair or stabilization.

INTRODUCTION Three-dimensional (3-D) CT volumetric filling ratio (VFR) is a better predictor of proximal humerus stress shielding after short-stem anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) than using plain radiographs. METHODS Forty-four patients with short-stem aTSAs, preoperative CT scans, and a minimum 3-year radiographic follow-up were included. Patients were divided into group A (stress shielding) and group B (no stress shielding) based on the radiographic analysis. Standard implant filling ratios were measured on plain radiographs. The 3-D VFR of the metaphyseal and diaphyseal segments of the aTSA stem was measured using MIMICS (Materialise). The area under a receiver operator characteristic curve was used to determine the predictive strength of the 3-D VFR method. RESULTS The average age and radiographic follow-up was 69 years and 44 months. Group A had 19 patients and statistically higher filling ratios using 3-D VFR method than group B, whereas no notable differences were found between the groups using standard techniques. The 3-D VFR had an area under a receiver operator characteristic curve of 92%, which supports it as a good predictor of stress shielding. CONCLUSIONS These methods enable early identification of patients at risk for stress shielding and can also be valuable in improving humeral stem designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III. Case-control study.

BACKGROUND The variation in the anatomic relationship between the coracoid and the clavicle affects the biomechanical stability of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR). METHODS Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of 85 patients was analyzed. Anatomic landmarks were used to derive the coracoclavicular sagittal reconstruction angle (sRA). The lateral concave angle, which indicated the shape of the distal clavicle, and the offsets between the clavicle and coracoid were also measured. To investigate the biomechanical effects of the sRA on CCLR, 7 computed tomography scans with different sRAs were 3D printed. Two reconstructions, a single trans-coracoclavicular tunnel and a looped reconstruction technique, were performed sequentially. Models were cyclically loaded at 70 N in the anterior, posterior, and superior directions. RESULTS The mean sRA was 68° ± 9.3° (range, 47°-85°). The superoinferior offset between the clavicle and the coracoid and the lateral concave angle positively correlated with the sRA (r = 0.359 and 0.837, respectively; P ≤ .001), whereas the anteroposterior offset had a negative correlation (r = -0.925; P < .001). The sRA had a negative correlation with the anterior displacement of the clavicle (rho = -0.96; P < .001) and a positive correlation with the posterior displacement for both surgical techniques (rho = 1.0; P < .001). CONCLUSION The anatomic orientation of the native coracoclavicular ligaments is highly variable in the sagittal plane. Low sagittal angles can reduce anterior stability, whereas high sagittal angles can reduce posterior stability of CCLR.

Hypothesis Musculoskeletal computer models provide valuable insights into shoulder biomechanics. The shoulder is a complex joint composed of glenohumeral, scapulothoracic, acromioclavicular, and sternoclavicular articulations, whose function is largely dependent on the many muscles spanning these joints. However, the range of patient-to-patient variability in shoulder function is largely unknown. We therefore assessed the sensitivity of glenohumeral forces to population-based model input parameters that were likely to influence shoulder function. Methods We constructed musculoskeletal models of the shoulder in the AnyBody Modeling System (AnyBody Technology, Aalborg, Denmark). We used inverse dynamics and static optimization to solve for glenohumeral joint forces during a simulated shoulder elevation. We generated 1000 AnyBody models by uniformly distributing the following input parameters: subject height, scapulohumeral rhythm, humeral head radius, and acromiohumeral interval. Results Increasing body height increased glenohumeral joint forces. Increasing the ratio of scapulothoracic to glenohumeral elevation also increased forces. Increasing humeral head radius and acromiohumeral interval decreased forces. The relative sensitivity of glenohumeral joint forces to input parameters was dependent on the angle of shoulder elevation. We developed an efficient method of generating and simulating musculoskeletal models representing a large population of shoulder arthroplasty patients. We found that scapulohumeral rhythm had a significant influence on glenohumeral joint force. Conclusions This finding underscores the importance of more accurately measuring and simulating scapulothoracic motion rather than using fixed ratios or average scapulothoracic motion. This modeling approach can be used to generate virtual populations for conducting efficient simulations and generating statistical conclusions.

To compare the biomechanical stability of 3 different coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques under rotational and vertical loading using a cadaveric model.In total, 12 cadaveric shoulders were used for testing. The native state was first tested then followed by 3 different reconstruction configurations using suture tapes and cortical buttons: coracoid loop (CL), single-bundle (SB), and double-bundle (DB). Superior displacement was measured by cycling an inferiorly directed force of 70 N to the scapula. The rotational stiffness of the scapula was determined by cycling the scapula in rotational displacement control between 15° of internal and external rotation. The rotational stiffness of the clavicle was determined by rotating the clavicle around its long axis 20° anteriorly and 30° posteriorly in rotational displacement control. All measurements were captured over 10 cycles at a rate of 200 Hz.Both the CL and SB techniques demonstrated significantly less internal scapular rotation stiffness. (intact: 19.70 ± 9.07 cNm/deg, CL: 3.70 ± 2.63 cNm/deg, SB:4.30 ± 2.66 cNm/deg, P.001) External scapular rotation stiffness was significantly decreased in all techniques (intact: 17.70 ± 4.43 cNm/deg, CL: 3.30 ± 1.37 cNm/deg, SB: 4.50 ± 1.56 cNm/deg, DB: 4.67 ± 1.99 cNm/deg, P.001). The CL and SB reconstructions were significantly less stiff with regards to posterior rotation of the clavicle (intact: 5.60 ± 1.80 cNm/deg, CL: 2.90 ± 1.10 cNm/deg, SB: 1.40 ± 0.65 cNm/deg, P.001). Anterior rotation stiffness of the clavicle was significantly lower in all of the reconstructions (intact: 6.95 ± 1.90 cNm/deg, CL: 3.08 ± 0.84 cNm/deg, SB: 3.64 ± 0.93 cNm/deg, DB: 4.48 ± 1.21 cNm/deg, P.001).None of the described techniques provided equivalent rotational stability in all planes compared with the native state. DB reconstruction presented stiffness characteristics closest to the native state under cyclic loading during internal scapular and posterior clavicular rotation.Additional procedures such as tendon grafting or acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction may be required to control rotational stability.

Hypothesis Glenoid retroversion can be corrected with standard glenoid implants after anterior-side asymmetric reaming or by using posterior augmented glenoid implants with built-in corrections. The purpose of this study was to compare 2 augmented glenoid designs with a standard glenoid design, measure the amount of bone removed, and compute the stresses generated in the cement and bone. Methods Finite element models of 3 arthritic scapulae with varying severities of posterior glenoid wear were each implanted with 4 different implant configurations: standard glenoid implant in neutral alignment with asymmetric reaming, standard glenoid implant in retroversion, glenoid implant augmented with a posterior wedge in neutral alignment, and glenoid implant augmented with a posterior step in neutral alignment. The volume of cortical and cancellous bone removed and the percentage of implant back surface supported by cortical bone were measured. Stresses and strains in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone were computed. Results Asymmetric reaming for the standard implant in neutral version required the most bone removal, resulted in the lowest percentage of back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to the most bone volume. The wedged implant removed less bone, had a significantly greater percentage of the back surface supported by cortical bone, and generated strain levels that risked damage to significantly less bone volume. Conclusions The wedged glenoid implants appear to have various advantages over the standard implant for the correction of retroversion. Level of evidence Basic Science Study; Computer Modeling

Total shoulder arthroplasty is recommended treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, which often results in excessive posterior wear. Two recent glenoid components with posterior augments have been designed to correct excessive posterior wear and retroversion. Our primary hypothesis was that posterior augmented glenoid designs require less bone removal than a standard glenoid design.Ten arthritic scapulae classified as Walch B2 glenoids were virtually implanted with standard, stepped, and wedged components. The volume of surgical bone removal, the maximum reaming depth, and the portion of the implant surface in contact with cancellous vs. cortical bone were calculated for each implant.The neoglenoid made up an average of 65% ± 12% of the glenoid width. Mean surgical bone volume removed was least for the wedged (2857 ± 1618 mm(3)) compared with the stepped (4307 ± 1485 mm(3); P.001) and standard (5385 ± 2348 mm(3); P.001) designs. Maximum bone depth removed for the wedged (4.2 ± 2.0 mm) was less than for the stepped (7.6 ± 1.2 mm; P.001) and standard (9.9 ± 3.2 mm; P.001). The mean percentage of the implant's back surface supported by cancellous bone was 18.2% for the standard, 8.8% for the stepped (P = .02), and 4.3% for the wedged (P = .01).Both augmented components corrected glenoid version to neutral and required less bone removal, required less reaming depth, and were supported by more cortical bone than in the standard implant. The least amount of bone removed was with the wedged design.

Background Medialization of the glenohumeral center of rotation alters the moment arm of the deltoid, can affect muscle function, and increases the risk for scapular notching due to impingement. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of position of the glenosphere on deltoid efficiency and the range of glenohumeral adduction. Methods Scapulohumeral bone models were reconstructed from computed tomography scans and virtually implanted with primary or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implants. The placement of the glenosphere was varied to simulate differing degrees of “medialization” and inferior placement relative to the glenoid. Muscle and joint forces were computed during shoulder abduction in OpenSim musculoskeletal modeling software. Results The average glenohumeral joint reaction forces for the primary total shoulder arthroplasty were within 5% of those previously reported in vivo. Superior placement or full lateralization of the glenosphere increased glenohumeral joint reaction forces by 10% and 18%, respectively, relative to the recommended reverse total shoulder arthroplasty position. The moment arm of the deltoid muscle was the highest at the recommended baseline surgical position. The baseline glenosphere position resulted in a glenohumeral adduction deficit averaging more than 10° that increased to more than 25° when the glenosphere was placed superiorly. Only with full lateralization was glenohumeral adduction unaffected by superoinferior placement. Discussion/Conclusion Selecting optimum placement of the glenosphere involves tradeoffs in bending moment at the implant-bone interface, risk for impingement, and deltoid efficiency. A viable option is partially medializing the glenosphere, which retains most of the benefits of deltoid efficiency and reduces the risk for scapular notching.

Background Press-fit humeral components for total shoulder arthroplasty have notable potential complications that may be minimized by preoperative templating and improvements in stem design. The purpose of this study was to develop a 3-dimensional templating technique for the humeral stem and to validate this templating in cadaveric specimens. Materials and methods A cylindrical stem and a stem with a rectangular cross-section were selected for templating and force measurements. Templating was carried out for 15 clinical patients and 16 cadaveric shoulders, including calculation of the cortical-implant volume ratio (CIVR). Insertion forces for stem broaching and impaction were measured for 15 patients and 8 paired cadaveric shoulders. Hoop strain and periprosthetic fractures were monitored in cadaveric shoulders with strain gauges. Results A significant difference in the CIVR was noted between rectangular and cylindrical stems. No difference was observed in impact forces for ideally sized rectangular or cylindrical stems. A difference in insertion forces was found between oversized cylindrical and oversized rectangular implant stems and also between ideal and oversized cylindrical implant stems. The difference in maximal hoop strain between ideally sized rectangular and cylindrical stems was also statistically significant. Conclusions CIVR is useful to predict an ideal humeral stem size. Cylindrical stems have a different design rationale for fixation than rectangular stems. Surgeon awareness of the fixation rationale for a particular stem design is important because different stem types have different effects on the insertion force. More anatomic humeral stem designs may help to minimize the risk of complications and optimize stem fixation.

Tibial tray malalignment has been associated with increased subsidence and failure. We constructed a finite element model of knee arthroplasty to determine the biomechanical factors involved in increasing the risk of subsidence with malalignment. Four fresh-frozen human knees were implanted with a tibial tray and subjected to forces representative of walking for up to 100,000 cycles. Cyclic displacement was measured between the tray and proximal tibia. The vertical load was shifted medially to generate a load distribution ratio of 55:45 (medial/lateral) to represent neutral alignment or 75:25 to represent varus alignment. Subjected specific geometry and material properties were obtained from qCT scans of tibia to construct a finite element model. The tray was subjected to a single load cycle representing experimental conditions. Tray displacement computed by the model matched that measured experimentally. Forces representing varus tray alignment generated greater strains in the proximal tibia and a greater volume of bone was subjected to strains higher than the fatigue threshold. Local compressive strains directly correlated with experimental subsidence and failure. Our results indicate that failure after tray malalignment is likely due to fatigue damage to the proximal tibia rather than shear across the implant–bone interface or failure of the cement mantle. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:347–353, 2011

The arthritic glenoid is typically in retroversion and restoration to neutral version is recommended. While a method for measurement of glenoid version using axial computed tomography (CT) has been reported and has been widely accepted, its accuracy and reproducibility has not been established.In 33 patients scheduled for shoulder arthroplasty, glenoid version and maximum wear of the glenoid articular surface were measured with respect to the scapular body axis on 2-dimensional- (2D) CT slices as well as on 3-dimensional- (3D) reconstructed models of the same CT slices.Clinical CT scans were axially aligned with the patient's torso but were almost never perpendicular to the scapular body. The average absolute error in version measured on the 2D-CT slice passing through the tip of the coracoid was 5.1 degrees (range, 0 - 16 degrees , P.001). On high-resolution 3D-CT reconstructions, the location of maximum wear was most commonly posterior and was missed on the clinical 2D-CT slices in 52% of cases.Error in measuring version and depth of maximum wear can substantially affect the determination of the degree of correction necessary in arthritic glenoids. Accurately measuring glenoid version and locating the direction of maximum wear requires a full 3D-CT reconstruction and analysis.

Knee forces are highly relevant to performance after total knee arthroplasty especially during high flexion activities such as squatting. We constructed subject-specific models of two patients implanted with instrumented knee prostheses that measured knee forces in vivo. In vivo peak forces ranged from 2.2 to 2.3 times bodyweight but peaked at different flexion angles based on the type of squatting activity. Our model predicted tibiofemoral contact force with reasonable accuracy in both subjects. This model can be a very useful tool to predict the effect of surgical techniques and component alignment on contact forces. In addition, this model could be used for implant design development, to enhance knee function, to predict forces generated during other activities, and for predicting clinical outcomes.

Background This study undertook a computational analysis of a wedged glenoid component for correction of retroverted glenoid arthritic deformity to determine whether a wedge-shaped glenoid component design with a built-in correction for version reduces excessive stresses in the implant, cement, and glenoid bone. Recommendations for correcting retroversion deformity are asymmetric reaming of the anterior glenoid, bone grafting of the posterior glenoid, or a glenoid component with posterior augmentation. Eccentric reaming has the disadvantages of removing normal bone, reducing structural support for the glenoid component, and increasing the risk of bone perforation by the fixation pegs. Bone grafting to correct retroverted deformity does not consistently generate successful results. Methods Finite element models of 2 scapulae models representing a normal and an arthritic retroverted glenoid were implanted with a standard glenoid component (in retroversion or neutral alignment) or a wedged component. Glenohumeral forces representing in vivo loading were applied and stresses and strains computed in the bone, cement, and glenoid component. Results The retroverted glenoid components generated the highest compressive stresses and decreased cyclic fatigue life predictions for trabecular bone. Correction of retroversion by the wedged glenoid component significantly decreased stresses and predicted greater bone fatigue life. The cement volume estimated to survive 10 million cycles was the lowest for the retroverted components and the highest for neutrally implanted glenoid components and for wedged components. Conclusion A wedged glenoid implant is a viable option to correct severe arthritic retroversion, reducing the need for eccentric reaming and the risk for implant failure.

We generated patient-specific computer models of total knee arthroplasty from 10 patients to compute maximum flexion angle before implant-bone impingement. Motion was simulated for 5 different femoral implant positions and 11 different tibial insert positions at 4 different tibial posterior slopes. In the neutral position, the mean maximum flexion angle was 136.3°. The range because of anatomical variation among patients was 13.0°. A combination of 2-mm posterior translation of the femoral component with a 10-mm anterior translation of the insert and a 7° posterior slope increased flexion by a mean of 14° relative to the neutral position. The rate of change in flexion angle was 0.4°/mm to 1.5°/mm with respect to implant position and 1.5°/mm increase in the posterior condylar offset.

Injuries to the glenoid labrum are common in young athletic patients and can lead to shoulder pain and instability. Primary repair of glenoid labral tears is more widely performed by arthroscopic reattachment of the detached labrum to the glenoid rim with labral anchor devices.16 While anchors have a large variety in composition, size, and suture configuration, they all utilize the glenoid rim as port of entry into the glenoid vault and the glenoid bone stock as a base for stable attachment. Arthroscopic placement of anchor devices can be challenging because of limited surgical exposure. Understanding the bony morphology of the glenoid and proper arthroscopic placement of the suture anchor are essential to the success of glenoid labral repairs.15 An incorrect angle of insertion can lead to perforation of the glenoid vault or damage to the articular cartilage of the glenoid face, resulting in chronic pain, restriction of motion, recurrence of primary pathology, and reoperation.12 Recent arthroscopic cadaveric studies have shown that the glenoid perforation rate can be as high as 100% during Bankart repair10 and superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesion repair.6,13 Medial glenoid cortex perforation during SLAP repair increases the risk of suprascapular nerve injury.6,13,20 Because of scapular anatomy, approaching the posterior glenoid can be clinically challenging. Chan et al2 demonstrated a high perforation rate during SLAP repair. Their cadaveric study showed 14% perforation rate using a low posterosuperior drill hole utilizing the port of Wilmington at the 10:00 clockface position, and 67% of the perforated glenoids demonstrated suprascapular nerve injury. Lehtinen et al9 reported glenoid rim angles at 5 anchor locations, corresponding to the 3:00, 4:30, 6:00, 7:30, and 9:00 clockface positions. We also determined the safe insertion range and optimal insertion angle at the 10:30 position (where the acromion complicates the surgical approach) by simulating the use of the Nevaiser portal and posterolateral to the acromion by simulating the use of the portal of Wilmington. In spite of the reported high glenoid perforation rates and in light of the biomechanical advantage of orthogonal anchor placement relative to the glenoid rim, there are no universally accepted recommendations for surgically safe and optimal insertion angles. The purposes of this study were to (1) determine the safe insertion range available to avoid perforation, (2) determine the optimal insertion angle at various positions on the glenoid rim, and (3) provide surgical guidelines to minimize risk of perforation.