Search

Background Lung cancer is the highest incident cancer globally and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality particularly if identified at a late stage. Poor patient outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC’s) might reflect contextual patient and health system constraints at multiple levels, that act as barriers to prevention, disease recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Lung cancer screening, even for high-risk patients, is not available in the public health sector in South Africa (SA), where the current HIV and tuberculosis (TB) epidemics often take precedence. Yet, there has been no formal assessment of the individual and health-system related barriers that may delay patients with lung cancer from seeking and accessing help within the public health care system and receiving the appropriate and effective diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to derive consensus from health-system stakeholders in the urban Gauteng Province of SA on the most important challenges faced by the health services and patients in achieving optimum lung cancer management and to identify potential solutions. Methods The study was undertaken among 27 participant stakeholders representing clinical managers, clinicians, opinion leaders from the public health sector and non-governmental organisation (NGO) representatives. The study compromised two components: consensus and engagement. For the consensus component, the Delphi Technique was employed with open-ended questions and item ranking from five rounds of consensus-seeking, to achieve collective agreement on the most important challenges faced by patients and the health services in achieving optimal lung cancer management. For the engagement component, the Nominal Group Technique was used to articulate ideas and reach an agreement on the group’s recommendations for solution strategies and approaches. Results Public health sector stakeholders suggested that a lack of knowledge and awareness of lung cancer, and the apparent stigma associated with the disease and its risk factors, as well as symptoms and signs, are critical to treatment delay. Furthermore, delays in up-referral of patients with suspected lung cancer from district health care level were attributed to inadequate knowledge arising from a lack of in-service training of nurses and doctors regarding oncologic symptoms, risk factors, need for further investigation, interpretation of x-rays and available treatments. At a tertiary level, participants suggested that insufficient availability of specialised diagnostic resources (imaging, cytological and pathological services including biomolecular assessment of lung cancer), theatres, cardiothoracic surgeons, and appropriate therapeutic modalities (chemotherapeutic agents and radiation oncology) are the main barriers to the provision of optimal care. It was suggested that a primary prevention programme initiated by the government that involves private-public partnerships may improve lung cancer management nationally. Conclusions Considerable barriers to the early identification and treatment of lung cancer exist. Finding solutions to overcome both individual and health-system level obstacles to lung cancer screening and management are vital to facilitate early identification and treatment, and to improve survival. Furthermore, research on inexpensive biomarkers for asymptomatic disease detection, the introduction of diagnostic imaging tools that utilise artificial intelligence to compensate for inadequate human resources and improving clinical integration across all levels of the healthcare system are essential.

Background: The International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care (IAHPC) developed a consensus-based definition of palliative care (PC) that focuses on the relief of serious health related suffering, a concept put forward by the Lancet Commission Global Access to Palliative Care and Pain Relief. Aim: The objective of this paper is to present the research behind the new definition. Methods: The three-phased consensus process involved health care workers from countries in all income levels. In phase one, 38 PC experts evaluated the components of the World Health Organization (WHO) definition and suggested new/revised ones. In phase two, 412 IAHPC members in 88 countries expressed their level of agreement with the suggested components. In phase three, using results from phase two, the expert panel developed the definition. Results: The consensus-based definition is “Palliative care is the active holistic care of individuals across all ages with serious health-related suffering due to severe illness and especially of those near the end of life. It aims to improve the quality of life of patients, their families and their caregivers.” The definition includes a number of bullet points with additional details as well as recommendations for governments to reduce barriers to palliative care. Conclusions: Participants had significantly different perceptions and interpretations of PC. The greatest challenge faced by the core group was trying to find a middle ground between those who think that PC is the relief of all suffering, and those who believe that PC describes the care of those with a very limited remaining life span.

Context In sub-Saharan Africa, late diagnosis with cancer is common. Many dying patients rely on family members for care; little is known about the challenges African informal caregivers face. Objectives To better understand the challenges of informal caregivers at the end of life in South Africa, both at home and in inpatient facilities. Methods We included advanced cancer patients and caregivers from a public hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Study nurses interviewed patients and caregivers about their experiences. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we determined the factors associated with greater caregiver difficulty, focusing on patients dying at home vs. in inpatient facilities. Results Among 174 informal caregivers, 62 (36%) reported "a lot" of challenges. These caregivers struggled most with keeping the patient clean (16%) and with patient interactions (34%). Symptoms associated with greater difficulty included pain (odds ratio [OR] 2.4 [95% CI 1.2–4.7]), urinary incontinence (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.1–4.9]), fecal incontinence (OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.0–5.7]), insomnia (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.3–6.9]), fatigue (OR 6.3 [95% CI 1.8–21.6]), extremity weakness (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.3–6.9]), shame (OR 4.2 [95% CI 1.5–12.0]), and sadness (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.1–4.8]). Caregivers of patients dying at home reported the greatest difficulty with patients' physical symptoms; caregivers of those dying in facilities reported the greatest difficulty with emotional symptoms. Conclusion Informal caregivers of patients dying at home reported challenges with practical functional care; this effect was reduced in the inpatient setting. Skills training for these caregivers could relieve some of this burden.

172 Background: In the USA, use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments for monitoring treatment toxicity has been associated with improved patient quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes. No similar PRO tools exist for the African cancer patients. We aimed to validate the Patient Reported Symptoms – South Africa (PRS-SA) survey, a novel PRO tool designed to measure subjective stress and symptoms in South African (SA) cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Methods: We enrolled patients receiving chemotherapy at the oncology clinic at Charlotte Maxeke Hospital, Johannesburg. At 3 separate visits, participants completed the PRS-SA survey, which allowed reporting of stress on a numerical ranking scale (range 0-10) and severity of 11 common chemotherapy-related symptoms (i.e., pain, fatigue, fever, dyspnea, cough, mucositis, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and neuropathy) using lay language descriptions corresponding to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades. They simultaneously completed the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), the Global Impression of Change (GIC) questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). All instruments were offered in English and isiZulu. We constructed a receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve for stress scale values and a total HADS score ≥15, representing clinical depression/anxiety. We evaluated construct validity for each symptom item by comparing symptom severity to the simultaneous QLQ-C30 summary score (Pearson correlation tests) and ECOG performance status (PS) (Mann-Whitney U tests). We assessed symptom item responsiveness by comparing change in severity across visits to change in QLQ-C30 summary score and comparing standardized mean symptom scores in those reporting negative, no, or positive change on the GIC using a Jockheere-Terpstra trend test. Results: Overall, 196 participants completed instruments at visit 1, 173 at visit 2, and 150 at visit 3. Area under the ROC curve for stress score was 0.76, and a score of 4 had 82% sensitivity and 55% specificity for clinical depression/anxiety. All symptom items showed construct validity by association with QLQ-C30 score (all p-values < 0.0001), and all but mucositis showed validity by association with ECOG PS (highest p = 0.03). All but cough showed responsiveness to change in QLQ-C30 score (highest p = 0.045), and the standardized mean in symptom scores demonstrated a trend across negative, neutral, and positive GIC scores (p = 0.03). Conclusions: In SA cancer patients, the PRS-SA’s stress scale behaves similarly to the distress thermometer in other populations, and the symptom items demonstrated construct validity and responsiveness. Further research should address implementation of the PRS-SA in the clinical setting for monitoring cancer treatment-related toxicity and its impact of patients’ QoL and outcomes.

Context When religious and spiritual (R/S) care needs of patients with advanced disease are met, their quality of life (QoL) improves. We studied the association between R/S support and QoL of patients with cancer at the end of life in Soweto, South Africa. Objectives To identify R/S needs among patients with advanced cancer receiving palliative care services and to assess associations of receipt of R/S care with patient QoL and place of death. Methods A prospective cohort study conducted from May 1, 2016 to April 30, 2018 at a tertiary hospital in Soweto, South Africa. Nurses enrolled patients with advanced cancer and referred them to the palliative care multidisciplinary team. Spiritual counselors assessed and provided spiritual care to patients. We compared sociodemographic, clinical, and R/S factors and QoL of R/S care recipients and others. Results Of 233 deceased participants, 92 (39.5%) had received R/S care. Patients who received R/S care reported less pain (2.82 ± 1.23 vs. 1.93 ± 1.69), used less morphine, and were more likely to die at home than patients who did not (57.5% compared with 33.7%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for significant confounding influences and baseline African Palliative Care Association Palliative care Outcome Scale scores, receipt of spiritual care was associated with reduced pain and family worry (odds ratio 0.33; 95% CI 0.11–0.95 and odds ratio 3.43; 95% CI 1.10–10.70, respectively). Conclusion Patients with cancer have R/S needs. R/S care among our patients appeared to improve their end-of-life experience. More research is needed to determine the mechanisms by which R/S care may have improved the observed patient outcomes.

Cancer is rapidly becoming a major health care problem, especially in developing countries, where 60% of the world’s total new cases are diagnosed. The success of new antineoplastic medicines and modern radiation devices to cure a good proportion of patients with cancer and to alleviate the suffering of many more has been achieved at a dramatic cost. Therefore, it has become mandatory for health care authorities and pharmaceutical companies to cooperate to use and develop resources in an efficient manner to improve health care delivery to patients with cancer worldwide. Regulatory harmonization is an important key to overcome delays in the approval process, whether for antineoplastic and pain control medicines or for essential medical devices. More emphasis on the significant role of opiates in pain control among patients with cancer is needed to overcome the ingrained belief in their potential for addiction. The World Health Organization (WHO) serves an important role in guiding priorities for health care and efficiently allocating resources by providing essential medicine lists (EMLs) and device lists. However, the financial challenge for access to health care is multi-tiered and requires collaboration between key stakeholders including pharmaceutical industry, local national health authorities, WHO, and other nonprofit, patient-oriented organizations.

CONTEXT. Identifying factors that affect terminally ill patients’ preferences for and actual place of death may assist patients to die wherever they wish. OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with preferred and actual place of death for cancer patients in Johannesburg, South Africa. METHODS. In a prospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, adult patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers were enrolled from 2016 to 2018. Study nurses interviewed the patients at enrollment and conducted postmortem interviews with the caregivers. RESULTS. Of 324 patients enrolled, 191 died during follow-up. Preferred place of death was home for 127 (66.4%) and a facility for 64 (33.5%) patients; 91 (47.6%) patients died in their preferred setting, with a kappa value of congruence of 0.016 (95% CI = −0.107, 0.139). Factors associated with congruence were increasing age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.05), use of morphine (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.04–3.36), and wanting to die at home (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24–0.82). Dying at home was associated with increasing age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.05) and with the patient wishing to have family and/or friends present at death (OR 6.73, 95% CI 2.97–15.30). CONCLUSION. Most patients preferred to die at home, but most died in hospital and fewer than half died in their preferred setting. Further research on modifiable factors, such as effective communication, access to palliative care and morphine, may ensure that more cancer patients in South Africa die wherever they wish. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019;57:923–932. © 2019 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Purpose The understanding of patients with cancer of their condition and their wishes regarding care as they approach end of life (EoL) have been studied more in high-income countries than in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Patients and Methods Data were analyzed from a cohort study (N = 221) of patients with advanced cancer who were recruited from a palliative care center in Soweto, South Africa (LMIC), between May 2016 and June 2017. Patients were asked about their understanding of their illness, estimated life expectancy, EoL care communication, and EoL care preferences. Results Only 13 patients (5.9%) acknowledged that they were terminally ill; nine patients (4.1%) estimated accurately that they had months, not years, left to live. A total of 216 patients (97.7%) reported that they had not had an EoL care discussion with their physician, and 170 patients (76.9%) did not want to know their prognosis even if the doctor knew it. Most patients preferred comfort care (72.9%; n = 161) to life-extending care (14.0%; n = 31), and did not want to be kept alive using extreme measures (80.5%; n = 178) or have their doctors do everything possible to extend their lives (78.3%; n = 173). Finally, 127 patients (57.5%) preferred to die at home, and 51 (23.1%) preferred to die in the hospital. Most patients (81.0%; n = 179) had funeral plans. Conclusion South African patients demonstrated less awareness of the fact that they were terminally ill, were less likely to have discussed their prognosis with their doctor, and more strongly preferred comfort care to life-extending EoL care than US and other LMIC patients in prior research. These differences highlight the need for culturally appropriate, patient-centered EoL care for South African patients with advanced cancer as well as to determine individual preferences and needs in all EoL settings.

Most cancers occur in developing countries, with 60 % of cancer cases and 70 % of cancer deaths occurring in Africa, Asia and Central and South America, where the disease is increasingly a public health concerngiven the regions’ populous nature and often deficient preventive and curative oncological approaches and treatment access. Palliative care has often been forced to occupy the service gap left by inadequate oncology services. However, palliative care service provision and patient coverage in developing regionsis at best variable. This chapter discusses the status of palliative care services in Africa, Eastern Europe, India and Latin America, before exploring its role in addressing the needs of patients with non-cancer and cancer diagnoses, and the potentially beneficial emphasis on primary prevention in combination with enhanced palliative care services for patients with a cancer diagnosis as part of an overall cancer control strategy.

Palliative care research in Africa is in its relative infancy, with dedicated financial support extremely limited. Therefore, setting research priorities to optimize use of limited resources is imperative.To develop a prioritized research agenda for palliative care in Africa.We used a two-stage process involving palliative care professionals and researchers: 1) generation of an initial topic list at a consultative workshop of experts and 2) prioritization of that list using a consensus development process, the nominal group technique.Phase 1: 41 topics were generated across five groups, with several topics nominated in more than one group. Phase 2: 16 topics and three broad thematic areas were identified. The two most prioritized topics within each of the three themes were the following: Theme 1: patient, family, and volunteers-1) care outcomes and the impact of palliative care as perceived by patients and caregivers and 2) palliative care needs of children; Theme 2: health providers-1) impact of palliative care training on care and practice and 2) integration of palliative care and antiretroviral therapy services; and Theme 3: health systems-1) palliative care needs assessments at the micro-, meso-, and macro-levels and 2) integration of palliative care into health systems and educational curricula.Consensus-based palliative care topics determined by the study can assist researchers in optimizing limited research capacities by focusing on these prioritized areas. Subsequent to the identification and publication of the research agenda, concrete steps will be undertaken by the African Palliative Care Research Network and other partners to help implement it.