Search

Cefiderocol is a new cephalosporin with a catechol in its chemical structure faciliting its access to the interior of bacteria through iron channels. In addition, it is broadly stable to beta-lactamases. The pharmacokinetic profile is a beta-lactam one: no oral absorption, and with a wide distribution within the vascular space and the interstitial fluid of well vascularized tissues, reaching therapeutic concentrations in the alveolar lavage fluid and within the macrophage. The binding of cefiderocol to human plasma proteins, primarily albumin, is moderate (range 40-60%). The terminal elimination half-life in healthy adult subjects was 2 to 3 hours. Cefiderocol is mainly renally eliminated, so dose adjustments are recommended in subjects with moderate / severe renal impairment, in case of dialysis, and probably in patients with external clearance. Like other beta-lactams, the PK / PD parameter that has been shown to best correlate with efficacy is the efficacy time of unbound plasma concentrations (%fT>MIC), which must be close to 100% to achieve a bactericidal effect. This is possible with 2 g in a 3-hour infusion every 8 hours. In controlled trials appears to be well tolerated, similar to comparators: meropenem or imipenem-cilastatin. Cefiderocol has no apparent clinically significant effect on ECG parameters nor on plasma iron values.

Endocarditis due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae is a rare but challenging condition. Its treatment relies on carbapenems alone or in combination, and no alternative has been described to date. The cephamycin cefoxitin has been used for treatment of mild ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections.We report two patients with nosocomial endocarditis due to ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae who underwent clinical failure or adverse event, respectively, during treatment with imipenem-cilastatin. The first patient was subsequently treated with cefoxitin combined with ciprofloxacin with a favorable outcome. In the second patient, the endocarditis relapsed following a 6-week treatment with cefoxitin and fosfomycin. In time-kill assays, the cefoxitin/ciprofloxacin and cefoxitin/fosfomycin combinations showed synergistic effect.These cases illustrate that cefoxitin is an interesting alternative to carbapenems, even in severe infections such as endocarditis. Pharmacokinetic optimization and combination with another synergistic antibiotic should be considered whenever possible.

Imipenem cilastatin sodium, as a member of a new generation of β-lactam antibiotics, has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity and a very wide range of application. Thrombocytopenia has been reported as a rare adverse event in several studies of patients treated with imipenem cilastatin sodium. In this study, we present a case of thrombocytopenia associated with imipenem cilastatin sodium in an older patient. The 78-year-old male patient with pulmonary infection was initiated on anti-infection therapy with imipenem cilastatin sodium. On the 9

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and 2-year follow-up clinical outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) using imipenem/cilastatin sodium for chronic low back pain resistant to conservative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review identified 14 patients who underwent TAE for chronic low back pain between October 2017 and August 2018. Patients with low back pain related to the facet or sacroiliac joint, lasting ≥ 6 months, refractory to ≥ 3 months of conservative treatment were eligible for TAE. Each patient received embolization of feeding arteries of painful regions. The changes in brief pain inventory (BPI) scores, adverse events, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, and 24 months after TAE. Clinical success was defined as BPI maximum pain intensity decrease of ≥ 2 and ODI decrease of ≥ 10 points from baseline. RESULTS Follow-up data were available in 13 and 11 patients, at 3 and 24 months after embolization, respectively. Intention-to-treat clinical success was obtained in 11/14 (79%) of patients at 3 months and 8/14 (57%) of patients at 24 months after TAE. Mean BPI maximum pain intensity and ODI scores decreased significantly from baseline to 1, 3, and 24 months after treatment (7.6 vs.. 4.3, 3.4, and 4.1; 40.8 vs 21.5, 20.0, and 23.8, respectively; all P

PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial infusion of temporary embolic material with/without radiographic monitoring via a needle placed into the radial artery to occlude abnormal neovessels for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-one patients having Eaton stage II or III osteoarthritis, with a symptom duration longer than 6 months, resistant to conservative therapy for at least 3 months were prospectively enrolled. All procedures were performed by infusing imipenem/cilastatin sodium through a 24-gauge needle that was percutaneously inserted into the radial artery. Seven patients underwent the procedure with fluoroscopy, and 21 patients underwent the procedure without fluoroscopy. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, numerical rating scale (NRS), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale were evaluated before and at 2, 6, and 24 months after the first procedure. RESULTS Technical success was 100%. The mean procedure time (from the beginning of local anesthesia to the removal of needle) was 2.9 minutes ± 1.6. The QuickDASH score improved from the baseline to 2, 6, and 24 months (49.2 ± 11.2 vs 22.1 ± 11.2, 20.9 ± 16.6, and 19.5 ± 16.1, respectively, all P

Background Anthrax is endemic to many countries, including the United States. The causative agent, Bacillus anthracis, poses a global bioterrorism threat. Without effective antimicrobial postexposure prophylaxis (PEPAbx) and treatment, the mortality of systemic anthrax is high. To inform clinical guidelines for PEPAbx and treatment of B. anthracis infections in humans, we systematically evaluated animal anthrax treatment model studies. Methods We searched for survival outcome data in 9 scientific search engines for articles describing antimicrobial PEPAbx or treatment of anthrax in animals in any language through February 2019. We performed meta-analyses of efficacy of antimicrobial PEPAbx and treatment for each drug or drug combination using random-effects models. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships were developed for 5 antimicrobials with available pharmacokinetic data. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict unbound drug exposures in humans. Results We synthesized data from 34 peer-reviewed studies with 3262 animals. For PEPAbx and treatment of infection by susceptible B. anthracis, effective monotherapy can be accomplished with fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, β-lactams (including penicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and imipenem-cilastatin), and lipopeptides or glycopeptides. For naturally occurring strains, unbound drug exposures in humans were predicted to adequately cover the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs; those required to inhibit the growth of 50% or 90% of organisms [MIC50 or MIC90]) for ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and doxycycline for both the PEPAbx and treatment targets. Dalbavancin covered its MIC50 for PEPAbx. Conclusions These animal studies show many reviewed antimicrobials are good choices for PEPAbx or treatment of susceptible B. anthracis strains, and some are also promising options for combating resistant strains. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that oral ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and doxycycline are particularly robust choices for PEPAbx or treatment.

The article describes the use of the last-resort carbapenem antibiotic imipenem in combination with relebactam, a novel b-lactamase inhibitor, in the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia developing after SARS-CoV-2 infection in a young pregnant patient. The introduction briefly describes the mechanism and spectrum of activity of the antibiotic, including its dosage.

ObjectivesThe addition of novel β-lactamase inhibitors to carbapenems restores the activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of novel carbapenem–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.MethodsWe conducted a meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing novel carbapenem–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with comparators to assess the clinical and microbiological responses, mortality, and adverse events (AEs).ResultsA total of 1,984 patients were included. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) of clinical cure, microbiological eradication, all-cause mortality, and 28-day mortality were 1.11 (95% CI: 0.98–1.26), 0.98 (95% CI: 0.82–1.16), 0.90 (95% CI: 0.49–0.94), and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.49–0.94) between the novel carbapenem–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and control groups. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the phase II trial of imipenem–cilastatin/relebactam (ICR) against complicated urinary tract infections could be the most important factor of heterogeneity for the microbiological response. The therapeutic effect of novel carbapenem–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations was better in meropenem–vaborbactam (MEV), phase III trials, and number of patients less than 200. The RRs of AEs from any cause and serious adverse events (SAEs) for patients receiving novel carbapenem–β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93–1.04) and 1.01 (95% CI: 0.75–1.36), respectively.ConclusionsICR and MEV were superior to comparators for clinical cure and survival rate in the treatment of complicated infections, and both were as tolerable as the comparators.

Background. Antibiotic dosing in critically ill patients is complicated by variations in the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics in this group. The dosing of imipenem/cilastatin is usually determined by severity of illness and renal function.Objectives. To determine the correlation between estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) calculated with the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and imipenem trough levels in critically ill patients.Methods. This prospective observational study was done in the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) at Steve Biko Academic Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa. Imipenem trough levels were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and compared with eGFRs calculated with the CKD-EPI equation. Correlation was evaluated by the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient.Results. The study population consisted of 68 critically ill patients aged between 18 and 81 years; 43 (63%) were male, and the mean weight was 78 kg (range 40 - 140). On admission, 30 patients (44%) had sepsis, 16 (24%) were admitted for trauma, and 22 (32%) were admitted for miscellaneous surgical conditions. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores ranged from 4 to 39 (mean 18). The 28-day mortality rate was 29%. The mean albumin level was 16 g/L (range 7 - 25), the mean creatinine level 142 μmol/L (range 33 - 840), and the mean eGFR 91 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range 6 - 180). Imipenem trough levels ranged between 3.6 and 92.2 mg/L (mean 11.5). The unadjusted Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient between eGFR and imipenem trough level was –0.04 (p=0.761).Conclusion. Considering the high mortality rate of sepsis in ICUs and the rapid global increase in antimicrobial resistance, it is crucial to dose antibiotics appropriately. Owing to the variability of antibiotic pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients, this task becomes almost impossible when relying on conventional dosing guidelines. This study found that eGFRs do not correlate with imipenem blood levels in critically ill patients and should not be used to determine the dose of imipenem/cilastatin. Instead, the dose should be individualised for patients through routine therapeutic drug monitoring.

Introduction Relebactam, a novel class A/C β-lactamase inhibitor developed as a fixed-dose combination with imipenem/cilastatin, restores imipenem activity against imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative pathogens. Methods This phase 3, multicenter, open-label, noncomparative study (NCT03293485) evaluated relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin (250 mg/500 mg/500 mg) dosed every 6 h for 5–14 days in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) or complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including those with secondary sepsis. Sepsis was defined as an infection-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome, with a documented positive blood culture; patients meeting these protocol-defined criteria were evaluated for efficacy against sepsis. Results Of 83 patients enrolled, 81 patients (cIAI, n = 37; cUTI, n = 44) received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Escherichia coli was the most common baseline pathogen isolated in both patients with cIAI and cUTI. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 74.1% (n = 60/81) of patients, and drug-related AEs occurred in 18.5% (n = 15/81). The most common AEs were diarrhea and nausea (8.6%). Serious AEs occurred in nine patients, including one death, but none were considered treatment related. The primary efficacy endpoint for patients with cIAI was clinical response at end of treatment (EOT) in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population, and for patients with cUTI was microbiological response at EOT in the ME population. The proportion of cIAI and cUTI patients achieving favorable responses were 85.7% (n = 24/28) and 100.0% (n = 39/39), respectively. All patients with sepsis (cIAI, n = 1; cUTI, n = 5) achieved a favorable composite clinical and microbiological response at EOT. Conclusions A favorable safety and efficacy profile for relebactam/imipenem/cilastatin was observed in Japanese patients with cIAI and cUTI.

Acute generalized exanthematic pustulosis (PEGA) is a rare dermatological pathology characterized by the sudden and generalized appearance of multiple, sterile, non-follicular, punctate pustules on an erythematous and edematous base. It is frequently triggered by drugs, among which antibiotics stand out. We present the case of a 40-year-old male patient who was admitted to the emergency room due to abdominal pain síndrome, to rule out intra-abdominal tumor pathology, initially indicating ceftriaxone and metronidazole. The next day, he was re-admitted to the emergency room, finding, after emergency surgery, acute appendicitis complicated with intestinal perforation, for which they rotated the antibiotic therapy to imipenem-cilastatin + metronidazole. At the next 48 hours, he presents generalized erythema and some small pustules and microvesicles in the thoracic region, upper extremities and neck. Likewise, it is shown in laboratory tests, neutrophilic leukocytosis and hypoalbuminemia. In the biopsy, subcorneal and intraepidermal neutrophilic pustules are found, with edematous papillary dermis and perivascular inflammatory infiltrate with the presence of neutrophils and few eosinophils. With everything described above, we reached the conclusion of a PEGA, triggered by received antibiotics, ceftriaxone or imipenemcilastatin. After 6 days of the suspension of imipenem-cilastatin, the patient shows improvement of dermal lesions, with mild erythema and scant fine scaling., La pustulosis exantematosa generalizada aguda (PEGA) es una patología dermatológica poco frecuente, caracterizada por la aparición brusca y generalizada de múltiples pústulas puntiformes, estériles, no foliculares, sobre una base eritematosa y edematosa. Es desencadenada frecuentemente por fármacos, entre los cuales resaltan los antibióticos. Presentamos el caso de un paciente varón de 40 años, que ingresó a emergencia por síndrome doloroso abdominal a descartar patología tumoral intraabdominal, indicándole inicialmente ceftriaxona y metronidazol. Al día siguiente, reingresó a emergencia encontrando, tras la cirugía de emergencia, una apendicitis aguda complicada con perforación intestinal, por lo cual rotan la antibioticoterapia a imipenem-cilastatina + metronidazol. A las siguientes 48 horas, presentó eritema generalizado y algunas pústulas pequeñas y microvesículas en región torácica, extremidades superiores y cuello. Asimismo, se observó en los exámenes de laboratorio, leucocitosis neutrofílica e hipoalbuminemia. En la biopsia, se encontró pústulas neutrofílicas subcorneales e intraepidérmicas, con dermis papilar edematosa e infiltrado inflamatorio perivascular con presencia de neutrófilos y escasos eosinófilos. Con todo lo descrito anteriormente, llegamos a la conclusión de una PEGA, desencadenado por los antibióticos recibidos, ceftriaxona o imipenem-cilastatina. Tras 6 días de la suspensión de imipenem-cilastatina, paciente mostró mejoría de lesiones dérmicas, con leve eritema y escasa descamación fina.

The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro interactions of ambroxol hydrochloride (ABH) or amlodipine (AML) with commonly used antibacterial agents, including meropenem, imipenem-cilastatin sodium, biapenem, cefoperazone-sulbactam, polymyxin B, and tigecycline, against six carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) clinical isolates. Drug interactions were interpreted using two models, that is, the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) model and the percentage of growth difference (ΔE) model. The results show that a majority of the combination groups exhibited partial synergy and additive interactions, such as the combinations of carbapenems and cefoperazone-sulbactam (SCF) with ABH or AML. While the combination of PB/AML exhibited synergistic interactions against all tested isolates, and PB/ABH exhibited synergistic interactions against two isolates. The FICI and ΔE model correlated very well for the combinations of PBABH and PB/AML against AB2. The combinations of TGC with ABH or AML mainly exhibited additive and indifferent interactions. There were no antagonistic interactions observed in any of the combinations. In conclusion, this study revealed that the non-antibacterial agents ABH or AML can work synergistically or partial synergistically with antibacterial agents against CRAB. This finding is crucial for overcoming the carbapenem resistance of A. baumannii. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Drug combination is an effective approach for the treatment of resistant bacterial infection. The significance of using drug combination is that it can reduce drug dosage requirements, reduce the toxic effects of agents and prevent or delay the emergence of drug resistance. This study measured the in vitro interactions between non-antimicrobial agents and antibacterial agents against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and the results of this study provide new insight to find strategies to overcome the carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii.

The drug levels and clearances of imipenem in critically ill patients are not comprehensively described in current literature, yet it is vital that adequate levels be achieved for therapeutic success.To determine the proportion of critically ill patients treated with imipenem/cilastatin with sub-therapeutic imipenem plasma levels, and to compare the clinical outcomes of those patients with therapeutic levels with those who had sub-therapeutic levels.Trough imipenem plasma levels of 68 critically ill patients from a surgical intensive care unit were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Imipenem trough levels were compared with the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the causative bacterial agents, based on a target value of 100% time above MIC (¦Tgt;MIC).The proportion of participants with sub-therapeutic imipenem levels was 22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13% - 34%). The 14- and 28-day mortality rates in the sub-therapeutic group were 33% and 40%, respectively, compared with 19% (p=0.293) and 26% (p=0.346), respectively, in the therapeutic group. Sub-therapeutic imipenem plasma levels are associated with adjusted hazard ratio of 1.47 (95% CI 0.55 - 3.91).The lower proportion of critically ill patients with sub-therapeutic imipenem plasma levels in this study compared with previous studies may be attributed to the practice of higher dosages and the administration method of extended infusions of imipenem/cilastatin in our setting. The results demonstrate a trend of higher mortality in patients with sub-therapeutic imipenem levels, although the results were not statistically significant at this sample size.

Objective:We describe the baseline characteristics and complications of individuals with influenza in the US FDA’s Sentinel System by antiviral treatment timing.Design:Retrospective cohort design.Patients:Individuals aged ≥6 months with outpatient diagnoses of influenza in June 2014–July 2017, 3 influenza seasons.Methods:We identified the comorbidities, vaccination history, influenza testing, and outpatient antiviral dispensings of individuals with influenza using administrative claims data from 13 data partners including the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, integrated delivery systems, and commercial health plans. We assessed complications within 30 days: hospitalization, oxygen use, mechanical ventilation, critical care, ECMO, and death.Results:There were 1,090,333 influenza diagnoses in 2014–2015; 1,005,240 in 2016–2017; and 578,548 in 2017–2018. Between 49% and 55% of patients were dispensed outpatient treatment within 5 days. In all periods >80% of treated individuals received treatment on the day of diagnosis. Those treated on days 1–5 after diagnosis had higher prevalences of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and obesity compared to those treated on the day of diagnosis or not treated at all. They also had higher rates of hospitalization, oxygen use, and critical care. In 2014–2015, among those aged ≥65 years, the rates of hospitalization were 45 per 1,000 diagnoses among those treated on day 0; 74 per 1,000 among those treated on days 1–5; and 50 per 1,000 among those who were untreated.Conclusions:In a large, national analysis, approximately half of people diagnosed with influenza in the outpatient setting were treated with antiviral medications. Delays in outpatient dispensed treatment were associated with higher prevalence of comorbidities and higher rates of complication.

With the current carbapenem-resistant organism crisis, conventional approaches to optimizing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters are frequently inadequate, and traditional salvage agents (eg, colistin, tigecycline, etc) confer high toxicity and/or have low efficacy. However, several β-lactam agents with activity against carbapenem-resistant organisms were approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration, and more are anticipated to be approved in the near future. The primary goal of this review is to assist infectious disease practitioners with preferentially selecting 1 agent over another when treating patients infected with a carbapenem-resistant organism. However, resistance to some of these antibiotics has already developed. Antibiotic stewardship programs can ensure that they are reserved for situations in which other options are lacking and are paramount for the survival of these agents.

Background: This risk of vancomycin (VAN)-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) may be altered with combination regimens. The specific AKI risk when VAN is combined with imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam (IMP-C/REL) or piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) has not been clearly defined.Objectives: To quantify the dose-AKI relationships of VAN alone and in combination with TZP or imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam (IMP-C/REL).Methods: Ten to twelve week old male C57BL/6J mice (Charles River Laboratory) were dosed with study drug regimens in three stages. Stage 1 consisted of a VAN dose-ranging design (0-600 mg/kg/day) over a 7-day period to identify the VAN monotherapy dose-AKI relationship in the murine model. Stage 2 evaluated the approximate VAN dose eliciting 50% AKI response in Stage 1 in combination with the highest human equivalent doses (HED) used in pre-clinical murine models (2.5 g/kg/day of TZP, 320 mg/kg/day of IMP-C/REL). Stage 3 tested these combinations with fractionated doses of TZP or IMP-C/REL administered at 6- and 12-hour intervals. In these studies, AKI was defined both by biomarkers (serum creatinine [SCr], blood urea nitrogen [BUN]) and histopathological assessment by a treatment-blinded pathologist.Results: VAN doses of 300 to 500 mg/kg/day reproducibly led to development of AKI within 4 days of dosing. Mice treated with VAN alone had a near doubling of their baseline SCr and BUN compared to control, IMP-C/REL alone, or TZP alone. Both VAN+IMP-C/REL and VAN+TZP had significantly (p

Purpose The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial activity, efficacy, safety, and current regulatory status of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam are reviewed. Summary Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is a newly approved anti-infective combination of a well-established β-lactam and a new β-lactamase inhibitor for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis, and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) caused by susceptible gram-negative bacteria in patients 18 years of age or older with limited or no alternative treatment options. The antibiotic is also indicated for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP). The antibiotic is active in vitro against a wide range of pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. The addition of relebactam does not restore the activity of imipenem against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)–producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Two phase 3 clinical trials of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam were conducted. In the RESTORE-IMI 1 trial, the efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was found to be comparable to that of imipenem/cilastatin plus colistin for the treatment of infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative bacteria in patients with HABP/VABP, cUTIs, and cIAIs, with a significantly lower incidence of nephrotoxicity reported with the new antibiotic. The RESTORE-IMI 2 trial demonstrated the noninferiority of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam to piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of HABP/VABP. Commonly reported adverse events in clinical trials included anemia, elevated liver enzymes, electrolyte imbalances, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fever, phlebitis and/or infusion-site reactions, and hypertension. Conclusion Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against MDR gram-negative bacteria, including many CRE but excluding MBL-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. It is approved for the treatment of cUTIs, cIAIs, and HABP/VABP.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain a major complication of arthroplasty, most of which are caused by

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing threat to public health and an increasingly common problem for acute care physicians to confront. Several novel antibiotics have been approved in the past decade to combat these infections; however, physicians may be unfamiliar with how to appropriately utilize them. The purpose of this review is to evaluate novel antibiotics active against resistant gram-negative bacteria and highlight clinical information regarding their use in the acute care setting. This review focuses on novel antibiotics useful in the treatment of infections caused by resistant gram-negative organisms that may be seen in the acute care setting. These novel antibiotics include ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilistatin/relebactam, cefiderocol, plazomicin, eravacycline, and omadacycline. Acute care physicians should be familiar with these novel antibiotics so they can utilize them appropriately.

An 86-year-old woman with Borrmann type III colorectal cancer (Union for International Cancer Control pT4aN2bM1c, pStage IVc) had received dexamethasone for the last 6 months as palliative care. She presented with a low-grade fever, chest pain and cough. Chest radiography on admission showed cavities and consolidations bilaterally in the upper lobes. A blood examination on admission revealed highly elevated serum β-d-glucan levels. The diagnosis by bronchoscopy was pulmonary nocardiosis. With trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and imipenem/cilastatin, the β-d-glucan levels were decreased, and chest X-ray showed improvement after 1 month. β-d-glucan is known to be a biomarker of fungal infection. It is possible that β-d-glucan levels also indicate a pulmonary infection by Nocardia.

In February 2018, one 54-year-old male patient with severe scald complicated with pneumonia and sepsis was transferred to Qingdao Municipal Hospital from other hospital. Drugs including cephalosporin, vancomycin, and imipenem/cilastatin combined with ciprofloxacin were used successively for anti-infective treatment, with no obvious effect. Multiple bacterial culture results of sputum, blood, and wound exudate showed infection of extensively drug resistant2018年2月，青岛市市立医院收治1例经外院转入的严重烫伤合并肺炎和脓毒症的54岁男性患者。先后使用头孢菌素、万古霉素、亚胺培南/西司他丁＋环丙沙星等抗感染治疗，但无明显效果。痰液、血液及创面分泌物多次细菌培养结果提示泛耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染。入院第4天调整抗感染治疗方案，补充血浆、红细胞及白蛋白，行营养支持及对症处理，同时进行用药监护，关注药物相关不良反应。经过10余天的治疗，患者感染得到有效控制，病情逐渐好转。本病例提示，严重烧伤患者易发生严重且致命的全身性感染，抗菌药物的不规范使用增加了泛耐药菌的感染风险，清晰的抗感染思路和抗菌药物的有效应用有助于提高感染治疗的成功率，对改善严重烧伤患者的预后具有重要价值。.

Introduction Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antibacterial molecules. Imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are the two main molecules used in French healthcare services. Objective We aimed to evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two molecules by considering their pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, microbiological, and clinical properties. We demonstrated that imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are not alike. Method Review of the literature by querying the MEDLINE network. Results Imipenem-cilastatin is the first marketed molecule of the carbapenem class. It is more effective against Gram-positive cocci. Its stability does not allow for long infusions and its main adverse effect on the central nervous system limits its use. Meropenem is more effective against Gram-negative bacilli. Its stability and its milder adverse effects distinguish it from imipenem-cilastatin. Conclusion Meropenem is preferred for daily use in healthcare services when carbapenems are to be used.

Durlobactam (DUR; also known as ETX2514) is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with broad activity against Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Addition of DUR to sulbactam (SUL) in vitro restores SUL activity against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. The safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DUR alone and with SUL and/or imipenem-cilastatin (IMI-CIL) were evaluated in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled study. In part A, subjects, including a cohort of elderly subjects (which received DUR at 1 g), received single ascending doses of DUR ranging from 0., Durlobactam (DUR; also known as ETX2514) is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with broad activity against Ambler class A, C, and D β-lactamases. Addition of DUR to sulbactam (SUL) in vitro restores SUL activity against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. The safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of DUR alone and with SUL and/or imipenem-cilastatin (IMI-CIL) were evaluated in healthy subjects. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled study. In part A, subjects, including a cohort of elderly subjects (which received DUR at 1 g), received single ascending doses of DUR ranging from 0.25 to 8 g. In part B, multiple ascending doses of DUR ranging from 0.25 to 2 g were administered every 6 h (q6h) for 29 doses. In parts C and D, the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential, including the safety, of DUR (1 g) with SUL (1 g) and/or IMI-CIL (0.5/0.5 g) was investigated after single and multiple doses. Plasma and urine concentrations of DUR, SUL, and IMI-CIL were determined. Among 124 subjects, DUR was generally safe and well tolerated when it was administered either alone or in combination with SUL and/or IMI-CIL. After single and multiple doses, DUR demonstrated linear dose-proportional exposure across the studied dose ranges. Renal excretion was a predominant clearance mechanism. No drug-drug interaction potential between DUR and SUL and/or IMI-CIL was identified. SUL-DUR at 1 g (of each component) administered q6h with a 3-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion is under development for the treatment of serious infections due to A. baumannii. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02971423.)

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text, Purpose: Febrile neutropenia has a significant clinical and economic impact on cancer patients. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of different current empiric antibiotic treatments. Methods: A decision analytic model was constructed to compare the use of cefepime, meropenem, imipenem/cilastatin, and piperacillin/tazobactam for treatment of high-risk patients. The analysis was performed from the perspective of U.S.-based hospitals. The time horizon was defined to be a single febrile neutropenia episode. Cost-effectiveness was determined by calculating costs and deaths averted. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds (WTP), were used to address the uncertainty in cost-effectiveness. Results: The base-case analysis results showed that treatments were equally effective but differed mainly in their cost. In increasing order: treatment with imipenem/cilastatin cost $52,647, cefepime $57,270, piperacillin/tazobactam $57,277, and meropenem $63,778. In the probabilistic analysis, mean costs were $52,554 (CI: $52,242-$52,866) for imipenem/cilastatin, $57,272 (CI: $56,951-$57,593) for cefepime, $57,294 (CI: $56,978-$57,611) for piperacillin/tazobactam, and $63,690 (CI: $63,370-$64,009) for meropenem. Furthermore, with a WTP set at $0 to $50,000, imipenem/cilastatin was cost-effective in 66.2% to 66.3% of simulations compared to all other high-risk options. Discussion: Imipenem/cilastatin is a cost-effective strategy and results in considerable health care cost-savings at various WTP thresholds. Cost-effectiveness analyses can be used to differentiate the treatments of febrile neutropenia in high-risk patients.

Imipenem/cilastatin sodium/relebactam is a combination of imipenem/cilastatin, a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antibiotic, and β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam which has been developed for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) due to drug-resistant bacterial pathogens. The combination (Recarbrio) has been designated as a qualified infectious disease product (QIDP) and obtained FDA approval in 2019 for the treatment of cUTI and cIAI caused by susceptible Gram-negative microorganisms in adult patients with limited or no alternative treatment options. The product was also approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2020 for the treatment of infections due to aerobic Gram-negative organisms in adults with limited treatment options.