Search

The PLSP summarizes results from the phase 2/3 KidCOVE trial examining mRNA-1273 (Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine) in children 6 through 11 years of age. This study reviewed results from two parts of the KidCOVE clinical trial: Part 1 of the study was performed to select a dose of mRNA-1273 (50 μg or 100 μg) in children. A 50-μg dose was selected for further evaluation based on minimally unwanted side effects and sufficient antibodies (immune responses) against SARS-CoV-2. Part 2 of the study further evaluated the 50-μg dose of mRNA-1273 and compared it with placebo in children. Two 50-μg doses of mRNA-1273 were well tolerated with no new safety concerns. Two 50-μg doses also produced antibodies (immune responses) similar to those in young adults who received mRNA-1273 (100 μg) in a separate phase 3 study (the COVE trial). Study findings suggest that two 50-μg doses of mRNA-1273 were well-tolerated, and can prevent COVID-19 in children 6 through 11 years of age. Clinical Trial Registration:NCT04796896 (ClinicalTrials.gov) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A strain of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged during the past 2 to 3 years. Not to be confused with more familiar MRSA strains, this pathogen targets healthy, young patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fighting nosocomial infections is the responsibility of every member of the hospital community, from administrators to visitors. As healthcare facilities struggle to stay one step ahead of resistant pathogens, the role of physicians is critical. Are you doing all you can? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A 2-dose mRNA-1273 primary series in children aged 6 months-5 years (25 µg) and 6-11 years (50 µg) had an acceptable safety profile and was immunogenic in the phase 2/3 KidCOVE study. We present data from KidCOVE participants who received an mRNA-1273 booster dose., Methods: An mRNA-1273 booster dose (10 µg for children aged 6 months-5 years; 25 µg for children aged 6-11 years; age groups based on participant age at enrollment) was administered ≥6 months after primary series completion. The primary safety objective was the safety and reactogenicity of an mRNA-1273 booster dose. The primary immunogenicity objective was to infer efficacy of an mRNA-1273 booster dose by establishing noninferiority of neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses after a booster in children versus nAb responses observed after the mRNA-1273 primary series in young adults (18-25 years) from the pivotal efficacy study. Data were collected from March 2022 to June 2023., Results: Overall, 153 (6 months-5 years) and 2519 (6-11 years) participants received an mRNA-1273 booster dose (median age at receipt of booster: 2 and 10 years, respectively). The booster dose safety profile was generally consistent with that of the primary series in children; no new safety concerns were identified. An mRNA-1273 booster dose elicited robust nAb responses against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 among children and met prespecified noninferiority success criteria versus responses observed after the primary series in young adults., Conclusions: Safety and immunogenicity data support administration of an mRNA-1273 booster dose in children aged 6 months to 11 years., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04796896 (Clinicaltrials.gov)., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. M. B., X. Z., W. D., W. X., H. Z., B. G., R. K., E. J. A., R. D., J. M., and S. S. G. are employees of Moderna, Inc, and hold stock/stock options in the company. A. Y. and K. S. are consultants and were contracted by Moderna, Inc, for this study. V. B. has received institutional research support from Moderna, Inc, GSK-ViiV, Gilead Sciences, Inc, and Novavax, Inc. C. B. C. has consulted for Pfizer, Inc, Moderna, Inc, GSK plc, Vir Biotechnology, CommenseBio, Cowen Investment Management LLC, Sanofi S.A., and Guidepoint Global. C. A. Rostad has received institutional support from Moderna, Inc, BioFire, Inc, GSK plc, MedImmune, Micron Technology, Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Inc, Novavax, PaxVax, Pfizer, Inc, Regeneron, Sanofi Pasteur, and from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). She is coinventor of patented respiratory syncytial (RSV) vaccine technology, which has been licensed to Meissa Vaccines, Inc. E. J. A. has consulted for Pfizer, Inc, Sanofi Pasteur, GSK plc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Moderna, Inc, and Medscape, and his institution received funds to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from MedImmune LLC, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, PaxVax, Pfizer, Inc, GSK plc, Merck & Co, Inc, Sanofi Pasteur, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, and Micron Technology, Inc. E. J. A. served on a safety monitoring board for Kentucky BioProcessing, Inc, and Sanofi Pasteur. E. J. A. served on a data adjudication board for WCG and ACI Clinical and his institution received funding from the NIH to conduct clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines. K. L. has consulted for Gilead Sciences, Inc, has received research funding from the NIH and Moderna, Inc, and has received funding for clinical research from Gilead Sciences, Inc, Moderna, Inc, and Pfizer, Inc. C. A. Rodriguez has received institutional research support from Moderna, Inc, Novavax, Inc, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. M. D. has received clinical trial funding from Moderna, Inc, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. W. T. has received institutional research support from Moderna, Inc, Pfizer, Inc, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, GSK plc, ViiV Healthcare Limited, and AstraZeneca plc. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Determining an effective dosing regimen for piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients is challenging due to substantial pharmacokinetic variability caused by complex pathophysiological changes. To address this need, a prospective clinical study was conducted, which enrolled 112 critically ill patients and employed an opportunistic sampling strategy. Population modeling and simulation were performed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) and probability of target attainment (PTA) of piperacillin-tazobactam under various dosing regimens. Both piperacillin and tazobactam final models were one-compartment models with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Significant covariates included lean body weight for piperacillin and creatinine clearance along with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for both drugs. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that continuous infusion can achieve higher PTA than intermittent and extended infusions. When considering the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 mg/L for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (a frequently encountered bacterial pathogen among critically ill patients) and a PK/PD target of 100% fT >MIC, continuous infusion of 6 g/day is recommended for critically ill patients with a CLcr <60 mL/min, 9 g/day for patients with CLcr in the range of 60 to 129 mL/min, and 12 g/day for patients with a CLcr ≥130 mL/min. In addition, extended infusion represents a good alternative, especially the 3 g q6h or 4 g q6h regimens which can achieve the designated European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) non-species-related PK/PD breakpoint of 8 mg/L. Our study provided valuable insight into PTA outcomes, which, together with individual renal function of future patients and institution-specific piperacillin susceptibility patterns, may assist physicians when making dosing decisions., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Challenges remain in discerning microbiologic etiology and disease severity in childhood pneumonia. Defining host transcriptomic profiles during illness may facilitate improved diagnostic and prognostic approaches., Methods: Using whole blood ribonucleic acid sequencing from 222 hospitalized children with radiographic pneumonia and 45 age-matched controls, we identified differentially expressed genes that best identified children according to detected microbial pathogens (viral-only vs. bacterial-only and typical vs. atypical bacterial [+/- viral co-detection]) and an ordinal measure of phenotypic severity (moderate, severe, very severe)., Results: Overall, 135 (61%) children had viral-only detections, 15 (7%) had typical bacterial (+/- viral co-detections), and 26 (12%) had atypical bacterial (+/- viral co-detections). Eleven DE genes distinguished between viral-only and bacterial-only detections. Sixteen DE genes distinguished between atypical and typical bacterial detections (+/- viral co-detections). Nineteen DE genes distinguished between levels of pneumonia severity, including four genes also identified in the viral-only vs. bacterial-only model (IGHGP, PI3, CD177, RAP1GAP1) and four genes from the typical vs atypical bacterial model (PRSS23, IFI27, OLFM4, and ABO)., Conclusions: We identified transcriptomic biomarkers associated with microbial detections and phenotypic severity in children hospitalized with pneumonia. These DE genes are promising candidates for validation and translation into diagnostic and prognostic tools., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) experience recurrent bacterial pulmonary exacerbations. Management of these infections is increasingly challenging due to decreased antimicrobial susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. The pharmacokinetics of these agents are inadequately characterized in patients with CF., Methods: One hundred fifty-five pediatric and adult participants with CF receiving cefepime (n=82), meropenem (n=42), or piperacillin-tazobactam (n=31) were enrolled. Opportunistic blood samples were obtained during hospitalization. Population PK analysis was conducted using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Clinical and demographic characteristics were evaluated as potential covariates. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate probability of target attainment (PTA) for different dosing regimens., Results: Estimated creatinine clearance, and total or lean body weight, affected the pharmacokinetics of cefepime and meropenem. No covariates were identified for piperacillin and tazobactam. In the cefepime group, a 3-h infusion achieved higher PTA than a 0.5-h infusion for all participants. Estimated breakpoints (the respective minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) up to which ≥90% of patients are predicted to reach a PK/PD target) were two- to four-fold higher in pediatric participants receiving a 3-h vs. 0.5-h infusion. In the meropenem group, increased creatinine clearance led to reduced PTA. In the piperacillin-tazobactam group, total daily dose and mode of administration were principal drivers of PTA., Conclusions: Standard dosing regimens fail to achieve specific MIC targets in patients with CF. Therefore, clinicians should incorporate local antibiograms and PK models to determine optimal dosing. Further PK optimization to account for interindividual differences could be achieved by real-time beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Avian influenza viruses pose significant risk to human health. Vaccines targeting the hemagglutinin of these viruses are poorly immunogenic without the use of adjuvants., Methods: Twenty healthy men and women (18-49 years of age) were randomized to receive 2 doses of inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine alone (IIV) or with AS03 adjuvant (IIV-AS03) 1 month apart. Urine and serum samples were collected on day 0 and on days 1, 3, and 7 following first vaccination and subjected to metabolomics analyses to identify metabolites, metabolic pathways, and metabolite clusters associated with immunization., Results: Seventy-three differentially abundant (DA) serum and 88 urine metabolites were identified for any postvaccination day comparison. Pathway analysis revealed enrichment of tryptophan, tyrosine, and nicotinate metabolism in urine and serum among IIV-AS03 recipients. Increased urine abundance of 4-vinylphenol sulfate on day 1 was associated with serologic response based on hemagglutination inhibition responses. In addition, 9 DA urine metabolites were identified in participants with malaise compared to those without., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that tryptophan, tyrosine, and nicotinate metabolism are upregulated among IIV-AS03 recipients compared with IIV alone. Metabolites within these pathways may serve as measures of immunogenicity and may provide mechanistic insights for adjuvanted vaccines., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01573312., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. C. B. C. reports consulting fees from GSK, Pfizer, TD Cowen, Moderna, CommenseBio, and AstraZeneca for unrelated work. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Cellular and molecular characterization of immune responses elicited by influenza virus infection and seasonal vaccination have informed efforts to improve vaccine efficacy, breadth, and longevity. Here, we use negative stain electron microscopy polyclonal epitope mapping (nsEMPEM) to structurally characterize the humoral IgG antibody responses to hemagglutinin (HA) from human patients vaccinated with a seasonal quadrivalent flu vaccine or infected with influenza A viruses. Our data show that both vaccinated and infected patients had humoral IgGs targeting highly conserved regions on both H1 and H3 subtype HAs, including the stem and anchor, which are targets for universal influenza vaccine design. Responses against H1 predominantly targeted the central stem epitope in infected patients and vaccinated donors, whereas head epitopes were more prominently targeted on H3. Responses against H3 were less abundant, but a greater diversity of H3 epitopes were targeted relative to H1. While our analysis is limited by sample size, on average, vaccinated donors responded to a greater diversity of epitopes on both H1 and H3 than infected patients. These data establish a baseline for assessing polyclonal antibody responses in vaccination and infection, providing context for future vaccine trials and emphasizing the importance of carefully designing vaccines to boost protective responses towards conserved epitopes.

Influenza B viruses (IBVs) comprise a substantial portion of the circulating seasonal human influenza viruses. Here, we describe the isolation of human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that recognized the IBV neuraminidase (NA) glycoprotein from an individual following seasonal vaccination. Competition-binding experiments suggested the antibodies recognized two major antigenic sites. One group, which included mAb FluB-393, broadly inhibited IBV NA sialidase activity, protected prophylactically in vivo, and bound to the lateral corner of NA. The second group contained an active site mAb, FluB-400, that broadly inhibited IBV NA sialidase activity and virus replication in vitro in primary human respiratory epithelial cell cultures and protected against IBV in vivo when administered systemically or intranasally. Overall, the findings described here shape our mechanistic understanding of the human immune response to the IBV NA glycoprotein through the demonstration of two mAb delivery routes for protection against IBV and the identification of potential IBV therapeutic candidates., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests L.E.W. serves as a consultant for BigHat Biosciences. The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of BigHat Biosciences. C.B.C. serves as a consultant to GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, TDCowen Investments, Guidepoint Global, Debiopharm, and CommenseBio and receives royalties from UpToDate. The laboratory of C.B.C. receives funding for unrelated work from Moderna. J.E.C. has served as a consultant for Luna Labs USA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Emergent Biosolutions, GlaxoSmithKline, and BTG International Inc; is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Meissa Vaccines; a former member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Gigagen (Grifols); and is founder of IDBiologics. The laboratory of J.E.C. received unrelated sponsored research agreements from AstraZeneca, Takeda, and IDBiologics during the conduct of the study. The opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations contained herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the US Department of Defense. E.D., T.E.E., and B.J.D. are employees of Integral Molecular, B.J.D. is a shareholder of Integral Molecular. Vanderbilt University has applied for a patent pertinent to some of the materials in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Streptococcus pyogenes (group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus, GABHS) causes a range of human infections, including necrotizing fasciitis and toxic shock syndrome, because it produces exotoxins that damage host cells, facilitate immune evasion, and serve as T cell superantigens. GABHS conjunctivitis is rare. We report a case of membranous conjunctivitis in a 3-year-old child who was treated with a combination of targeted bactericidal antimicrobials, toxin-synthesis inhibition, and amniotic membrane transplantation., (Copyright © 2024 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Influenza A (H7N9) has caused multiple disease waves with evidence of strain diversification. Optimal influenza A (H7N9) prime-boost vaccine strategies are unknown., Methods: We recruited participants who had received monovalent inactivated A/Shanghai/2/2013 (H7N9) vaccine (MIV) approximately 5 years earlier, as follows: MIV with MF59 (MF59 × 2 group), MIV with AS03 (AS03 × 2 group), unadjuvanted MIV (No Adj group), MIV with MF59 or AS03 followed by unadjuvanted MIV (Adjx1 group), and A/H7-naive (unprimed group). Participants were randomized to receive 1 dose of AS03-adjuvanted or unadjuvanted A/Hong Kong/125/2017 (H7N9) MIV and were followed for safety and immunogenicity using hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) and neutralizing antibody assays., Results: We enrolled 304 participants: 153 received the adjuvanted boost and 151 received the unadjuvanted boost. At 21 days postvaccination, the proportion of participants with HAI antibody titers against the boosting vaccine strain of ≥40 in the adjuvanted and unadjuvanted arms, respectively, were 88% and 49% in MF59 × 2 group, 89% and 75% in AS03 × 2 group, 59% and 20% in No Adj group, 94% and 55% in Adjx1group, and 9% and 11% in unprimed group., Conclusions: Serologic responses to a heterologous A(H7N9) MIV boost were highest in participants primed and boosted with adjuvant-containing regimens., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03738241., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest . I. Y.’s institution received funding to conduct clinical research unrelated to this manuscript from Moderna and Pfizer; and I. Y. consults for Merck and Sanofi-Pasteur. P. W. has received research funding unrelated to this manuscript from Pfizer and Sanofi; and has consulted for Pfizer. C. B. C. serves as a consultant to Pfizer, Moderna, GSK, and Vir. K. M. E. serves as consultant to Bionet and IBM; and member of the Data Safety and Monitoring Boards for Sanofi, X-4 Pharma, Seqirus, Moderna, Pfizer, Merck, and Roche. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of acute bacterial arthritis (ABA) in children was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for children with ABA, including specialists in pediatric infectious diseases and orthopedics. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ABA are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews. Summarized below are the recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of ABA in children. The panel followed a systematic process used in the development of other IDSA and PIDS clinical practice guidelines, which included a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of the evidence and strength of recommendation using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) (see Figure 1). A detailed description of background, methods, evidence summary and rationale that support each recommendation, and knowledge gaps can be found online in the full text., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) has prioritized infections caused by gram-positive bacteria as one of its core areas of emphasis. The ARLG Gram-positive Committee has focused on studies responding to 3 main identified research priorities: (1) investigation of strategies or therapies for infections predominantly caused by gram-positive bacteria, (2) evaluation of the efficacy of novel agents for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and (3) optimization of dosing and duration of antimicrobial agents for gram-positive infections. Herein, we summarize ARLG accomplishments in gram-positive bacterial infection research, including studies aiming to (1) inform optimal vancomycin dosing, (2) determine the role of dalbavancin in MRSA bloodstream infection, (3) characterize enterococcal bloodstream infections, (4) demonstrate the benefits of short-course therapy for pediatric community-acquired pneumonia, (5) develop quality of life measures for use in clinical trials, and (6) advance understanding of the microbiome. Future studies will incorporate innovative methodologies with a focus on interventional clinical trials that have the potential to change clinical practice for difficult-to-treat infections, such as MRSA bloodstream infections., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors report funding support from the ARLG of the NIH and the NIAID (UM1AI104681). S. B. D. reports grants or contracts paid to her institution from Gilead, Pfizer, F2G, Regeneron, Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, and NIAID/NIH; consulting fees paid directly to her from Genentech and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson (J&J); travel and meeting support from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) to speak at IDWeek; a patent (US20100143379A1) for Mif agonists and antagonist and therapeutic uses thereof; a leadership role on the IDSA Antibacterial Resistance Committee, California Department of Public Health Hospital Acquired Infections Advisory Committee, and ARLG Innovations Group, Laboratory Center, Mentorship Committee, Gram-positive Committee, and Immunosuppressed Host Group; and payment directly to her for clinical events committee/adjudication committee participation from Shionogi, Basilea, and the Duke Clinical Research Institute.D. R. A. reports funding support from ContraFect and a leadership role on the ARLG Gram-positive Committee. A. B. reports funding support from the ARLG Early Faculty Seedling Award (NIAID UM1AI104681) and consulting fees from Roche. H. W. B. reports royalties from the Sanford Guide; consulting fees from the Sanford Guide, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy/American Society for Microbiology (ASM), and ID Clinics of North America/Elsevier; honoraria for Grand Rounds at Temple University; travel and meeting support for an IDWeek Lecture; membership as a voting member on the Presidential Advisory Council on Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria; and membership on the Board of Trustees at the College of the Holy Cross. B. C. reports grants or contracts paid to his institution from Moderna Vaccines and Merck Vaccines; royalties from UpToDate; consulting fees from Cowen Investments, Pfizer, Moderna, GSK, and Sanofi; payment as a medicolegal expert with multiple law firms; participation on the data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) or advisory board for Affinivax and GSK; and a leadership role as president of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. S. E. C. reports grants or contracts paid to her institution from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); consulting fees paid directly to her from the Duke Clinical Research Institute; participation on a DSMB for Debiopharm; and leadership roles as a board member of the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases and Globarl Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership North America (GARDP-NA). S. R. E. reports grants from the NIAID/NIH and De Gruyter (Editor-in-Chief for Statistical Communications in Infectious Diseases); royalties from Taylor & Francis; consulting fees from Genentech, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Microbiotix, J&J, Endologix, ChemoCentryx, Becton Dickinson, Atricure, Roviant, Neovasc, Nobel Pharma, Horizon, International Drug Development Institute (IDDI), SVB Leerink, Medtronic, Regeneron, Wake Forest University, Recor, Janssen, and IDDI; payments from Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks (ACTTION); meeting support from the FDA, Deming Conference on Applied Statistics, Clinical Trial Transformation Initiative, Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, International Chinese Statistical Association Applied Statistics Symposium, and Antimicrobial Resistance and Stewardship Conference; board member participation for the NIH, Breast International Group, University of Pennsylvania, Washington University, Duke University, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda, Akouos, Apellis, Teva, Vir, DayOneBio, Alexion, Tracon, Rakuten, AbbVie, Nuvelution, Clover, FHI Clinical, Lung Biotech, SAB Biopharm, Advantagene, Candel, and Novartis; and board positions with the American Statistical Association, Society for Clinical Trials, and Frontier Science Foundation. V. G. F. reports personal consulting fees from Novartis, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, The Medicines Co, MedImmune, Bayer, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, ContraFect, Regeneron, Destiny, Amphliphi Biosciences, Integrated Biotherapeutics, C3J, Armata, Valanbio, Akagera, Aridis, Roche, and Pfizer; grants from NIH, MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck, Medical Biosurfaces, Locus, Affinergy, ContraFect, Karius, Genentech, Regeneron, Deep Blue, Basilea, and Janssen; royalties from UpToDate; stock options from Valanbio and ArcBio; honoraria from the IDSA for his service as Associate Editor of Clinical Infectious Diseases; travel support from ContraFect to the 2019 European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID); and a sepsis diagnostics patent pending. S. A. F. reports grant or contracts from NIH (P50HD103525, U01AL116400, R21AI176063) and AHRQ (R01 HS024269), honoraria from ARLG, and provision of Clorox wipes for a clinical research study. B. J. K. reports grants from CDC and NIAID; honoraria from ARLG; and leadership roles in the CDC Microbiome Working Group, IDSA Journal Club, and ARLG. T. H. reports consulting fees from Tanabe-Mitsubishi Pharma and honoraria from Duke University and Cancer and Chemo Therapy. T. P. L. reports grants paid to his institution from Wockhardt; grants paid directly to him from Paratek, Cidara, Biofire Diagnostics, and Merck; payment directly to him for lectures from Shionogi, Ferring, Seres, and Melinta; consulting fees paid directly to him from AbbVie, Cidara Therapeutics, Ferring, ICPD, Genentech, J&J, Melinta, Merck, Roche, Shionogi, Spero, Venatrox, La Jolla, Seres, Paratek, GSK, and DoseMe; and payment for the development of educational presentations from the Mayo Clinic. L. G. M. reports grants or contracts from Merck, ContraFect, Paratek, Medline, and GSK. J. M. M. reports grants from Asociación Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico FONDECYT (grant number 1211947). B. S. reports advisory board fees paid directly to him from Basilia. T. T. T. reports grants from NIH paid to her institution; travel and meeting support from IDSA; and a leadership role on the IDWeek Planning Committee and a role as a Gulf Coast Consortium Cluster Reviewer (both unpaid). N. A. T. reports grants from CDC and PDI, Inc; and consulting fees from Techspert. D. J. W. reports grants paid to his institution from CDC and NIH/NIAID; a leadership role on the IDSA Childhood Pneumonia Guidelines Committee; and receipt of equipment from bioMérieux for procalcitonin assays for an observational study. T. L. H. reports grants from Karius and NIH; royalties from UpToDate; consulting fees from Aridis, Pfizer, Lysovant, and Affinivax; and participation on a DSMB for the SNAP Trial and the advisory board for Basilea. C. A. A. reports grant funding to their institution from NIH/NIAID (1 Po1 AI152999, R01AI148342, R01 AI346337, T32 AI141349, K24 Ai121296, U19 AI44297, R01 AI150685, and R21 AI151536), MeMed Diagnostics Ltd, Entasis Therapeutics, Merck Pharmaceuticals, and Harris County Public Health; royalties paid to them from UpToDate; reimbursement from IDSA for attending IDWeek as a speaker and part of the organizing committee; reimbursement from ASM to attend ASM Microbe as a speaker; reimbursement from the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) to attend SHEA as a speaker; reimbursement from the European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases to attend ECCMID as a speaker; reimbursement from Mérieux Foundation to attend ICARE course as faculty; reimbursement from Sociedad Chilea de Infectiologia, Sociedad Colombiana de Infectologia, Pan American Society for Infectious Diseases, and Brazilian Society for Infectious Diseases to attend the annual meeting and act as a speaker; was an unpaid participant on a DSMB with the World Health Organization and Antibacterial Pipeline Advisory Group; received payment for participation with the NIH Grant Review Study Sections; was a voluntary member of the board of directors of IDSA; and is the Editor-in-Chief of Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. B. E. M. reports royalties from UpToDate for online chapters; consulting fees from JRD, LLC (J&J), PPD Development, LP (GSK0 and Basilea Pharmaceutical International Ltd); participation on a DSMB with NIH Therapeutic and Prevention; and held the position of Governor of the Academy with the American Academy of Microbiology. C. L. reports grant payments to their institutions from NIAID/NIH (1R01AI151038-01) and Pfizer. M. H. S. reports advisory board fees from DoseMe; consulting fees from GSK and Entasis; and has an issued patent US10688195B2. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Importance: Rates of hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE) are increasing among pediatric patients. Identifying at-risk patients for whom prophylactic interventions should be considered remains challenging., Objective: To determine whether use of a previously validated HA-VTE prognostic model, together with pediatric hematologist review, could reduce pediatric inpatient rates of HA-VTE., Design, Setting, and Participants: This pragmatic randomized clinical trial was performed from November 2, 2020, through January 31, 2022, at a single-center academic children's hospital (Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt). All pediatric hospital admissions (aged <22 years) under inpatient status were included and randomized., Intervention: All patients had an HA-VTE probability automatically calculated daily, which was visible to the hematology research team for patients in the intervention group. Patients with an elevated risk (predicted probability ≥2.5%) underwent additional medical record review by the research team to determine eligibility for thromboprophylaxis., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was rate of HA-VTE. Secondary outcomes included rates of prophylactic anticoagulation and anticoagulation-associated bleeding events., Results: A total of 17 427 hospitalizations met eligibility criteria, were randomized, and were included in the primary analysis: patients had a median (IQR) age of 1.7 (0 to 11.1) years; there were 9143 (52.5%) female patients and 8284 (47.5%) male patients, and there were 445 (2.6%) Asian patients, 2739 (15.9%) Black patients, and 11 752 (67.4%) White patients. The 2 groups were evenly balanced in number (8717 in the intervention group and 8710 in the control group) and patient characteristics. A total of 58 patients (0.7%) in the control group and 77 (0.9%) in the intervention group developed HA-VTE (risk difference: 2.2 per 1000 patients; 95% CI, -0.4 to 4.8 per 1000 patients; P = .10). Recommendations to initiate thromboprophylaxis were accepted by primary clinical teams 25.8% of the time (74 of 287 hospitalizations). Minor bleeding events were rare among patients who received anticoagulation (3 of 74 [4.1%]), and no major bleeding events were observed during the study period. Among patients randomized to the control group, the model exhibited high discrimination accuracy (C statistic, 0.799, 95% CI, 0.725 to 0.856)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of the use of a HA-VTE prognostic model to reduce pediatric inpatient rates of HA-VTE, despite the use of an accurate and validated prognostic model for HA-VTE, there was substantial reluctance by primary clinical teams to initiate thromboprophylaxis as recommended. In this context, rates of HA-VTE between the control and intervention groups were not different. Future research is needed to identify improved strategies for prevention of HA-VTE and to overcome clinician concerns regarding thromboprophylaxis., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04574895.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection; in the United States, reporting of MIS-C after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is required for vaccine safety monitoring. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was authorized for children aged 5-11 years on 29 October 2021. Covering a period when approximately 7 million children received vaccine, surveillance for MIS-C ≤ 90 days postvaccination using passive systems identified 58 children with MIS-C and laboratory evidence of past/recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 4 without evidence. During a period with extensive SARS-CoV-2 circulation, MIS-C illness in children after COVID-19 vaccination who lacked evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was rare (<1 per million vaccinated children)., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. S. K.'s institution has received funding from National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct clinical trials of Moderna and Janssen COVID-19 vaccines, and funding from Pfizer to conduct clinical trials of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines. M. A. S. reports funding from NIH, CDC, Pfizer, and Merck; and royalties from UpToDate. K. E. reports grant funding from NIH and CDC; consultant to Bionet, GSK, and IBM; and membership of Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Sanofi, X-4 Pharma, Seqirus, Moderna, Pfizer, Merck, and Roche. C. B. C. reports grants from NIH and Merck; royalties from UpToDate; consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Horizon Pharma, Premier Healthcare, Pfizer, Moderna, Cowen Investments, and Vindico; payment for medicolegal testimony from multiple firms (none related to this investigation); a US patent for staphylococcal antibody (number 10 981 979); participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Astellas; and is President of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. E. P. S. reports grants from the NIH and Pfizer; consulting fees from Sanofi Pasteur; and serves on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for vaccine trials sponsored by the NIH's Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America 2023.)

Objectives: We aimed to identify rational empirical dosing strategies for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients by utilizing population pharmacokinetics and target attainment analysis., Patients and Methods: A prospective and opportunistic pharmacokinetic (PK) study was conducted in 130 critically ill patients in two ICU sites. The plasma concentrations of cefepime were determined using a validated LC-MS/MS method. All cefepime PK data were analysed simultaneously using the non-linear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the PTA of cefepime at different MIC values following different dose regimens in subjects with different renal functions., Results: The PK of cefepime in critically ill patients was best characterized by a two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Creatinine clearance and body weight were identified to be significant covariates. Our simulation results showed that prolonged 3 h infusion does not provide significant improvement on target attainment compared with the traditional intermittent 0.5 h infusion. In contrast, for a given daily dose continuous infusion provided much higher breakpoint coverage than either 0.5 h or 3 h intermittent infusions. To balance the target attainment and potential neurotoxicity, cefepime 3 g/day continuous infusion appears to be a better dosing regimen than 6 g/day continuous infusion., Conclusions: Continuous infusion may represent a promising strategy for cefepime treatment in critically ill patients. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific cefepime susceptibility patterns as well as individual patients' renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of respiratory disease in infants, making vaccination an attractive preventive strategy. Due to earlier reports of vaccine-enhanced disease in RSV-naive children, assessing prior RSV infection is critical for determining eligibility for future infant vaccine trials. However, this is complicated by the presence of maternally transferred maternal antibodies. We sought to develop assays that measure immune responses to RSV pre-fusion (F) protein that discriminates between maternal and infant responses., Methods: We measured RSV-specific responses in two groups of children <3 years of age; those with laboratory-confirmed RSV (RSV-infected) and those enrolled prior to their first RSV season (RSV-uninfected). Serial blood samples were obtained and recent infections with RSV and other respiratory viruses were assessed during follow-up. An RSV pre-F-specific kinetic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (kELISA) and an F-specific reactive B cell frequency (RBF) assay were developed., Results: One hundred two young children were enrolled between July 2015 and April 2017; 74 were in the RSV-uninfected group and 28 were in the RSV-infected group. Participants were asked to provide sequential blood samples over time, but only 53 participants in the RSV-uninfected group and 22 participants in the RSV-infected groups provided multiple samples. In the RSV-infected group, most had positive kELISA and RBF during the study. In the RSV-uninfected group, two patterns emerged: declining kELISA values without reactive B cells, due to maternal transplacental antibody transfer, and persistently positive kELISA with reactive B cells, due to asymptomatic undiagnosed RSV infection., Conclusions: A kELISA targeting RSV pre-F epitopes and an RBF assay targeting RSV F-specific B cells generally allow discrimination between maternally and infant-derived antibodies., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objectives: Acute hematogenous musculoskeletal infections (MSKI) are medical emergencies with the potential for life-altering complications in afflicted children. Leveraging administrative data to study pediatric MSKI is difficult as many infections are chronic, nonhematogenous, or occur in children with significant comorbidities. The objective of this study was to validate a case-finding algorithm to accurately identify children hospitalized with acute hematogenous MSKI using administrative billing codes., Methods: This was a multicenter validation study using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. Hospital admissions for MSKI were identified from 6 PHIS hospitals using discharge diagnosis codes. A random subset of admissions underwent manual chart review at each site using predefined criteria to categorize each admission as either "acute hematogenous MSKI" (AH-MSKI) or "not acute hematogenous MSKI." Ten unique coding algorithms were developed using billing data. The sensitivity and specificity of each algorithm to identify AH-MSKI were calculated using chart review categorizations as the reference standard., Results: Of the 492 admissions randomly selected for manual review, 244 (49.6%) were classified as AH-MSKI and 248 (50.4%) as not acute hematogenous MSKI. Individual algorithm performance varied widely (sensitivity 31% to 91%; specificity 52% to 98%). Four algorithms demonstrated potential for future use with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve greater than 80%., Conclusions: Identifying children with acute hematogenous MSKI based on discharge diagnosis alone is challenging as half have chronic or nonhematogenous infections. We validated several case-finding algorithms using administrative billing codes and detail them here for future use in pediatric MSKI outcomes., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

In the present study, population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was performed based on meropenem data from a prospective study conducted in 114 critically ill patients with a wide range of renal functions and various disease conditions. The final model was a one-compartment model with linear elimination, with creatinine clearance and continuous renal replacement therapy affecting clearance, and total bodyweight impacting the volume of distribution. Our model is a valuable addition to the existing meropenem population PK models, and it could be particularly useful during implementation of a therapeutic drug monitoring program combined with Bayesian forecasting. Based on the final model developed, comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations were performed to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) of 16 different dosing regimens. Simulation results showed that 2 g administered every 8 h with 3-h prolonged infusion (PI) and 4 g/day by continuous infusion (CI) appear to be two empirical dosing regimens that are superior to many other regimens when both target attainment and potential toxicity are considered and renal function information is not available. Following a daily CI dose of 6 g or higher, more than 30% of the population with a creatinine clearance of <60 mL/min is predicted to have neurotoxicity. With the availability of institution- and/or unit-specific meropenem susceptibility patterns, as well as an individual patient's renal function, our PTA results may represent useful references for physicians to make dosing decisions.

Background: The safety, reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the mRNA-1273 coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccine in young children are unknown., Methods: Part 1 of this ongoing phase 2-3 trial was open label for dose selection; part 2 was an observer-blinded, placebo-controlled evaluation of the selected dose. In part 2, we randomly assigned young children (6 months to 5 years of age) in a 3:1 ratio to receive two 25-μg injections of mRNA-1273 or placebo, administered 28 days apart. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of the vaccine and to determine whether the immune response in these children was noninferior to that in young adults (18 to 25 years of age) in a related phase 3 trial. Secondary objectives were to determine the incidences of Covid-19 and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection after administration of mRNA-1273 or placebo., Results: On the basis of safety and immunogenicity results in part 1 of the trial, the 25-μg dose was evaluated in part 2. In part 2, 3040 children 2 to 5 years of age and 1762 children 6 to 23 months of age were randomly assigned to receive two 25-μg injections of mRNA-1273; 1008 children 2 to 5 years of age and 593 children 6 to 23 months of age were randomly assigned to receive placebo. The median duration of follow-up after the second injection was 71 days in the 2-to-5-year-old cohort and 68 days in the 6-to-23-month-old cohort. Adverse events were mainly low-grade and transient, and no new safety concerns were identified. At day 57, neutralizing antibody geometric mean concentrations were 1410 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1272 to 1563) among 2-to-5-year-olds and 1781 (95% CI, 1616 to 1962) among 6-to-23-month-olds, as compared with 1391 (95% CI, 1263 to 1531) among young adults, who had received 100-μg injections of mRNA-1273, findings that met the noninferiority criteria for immune responses for both age cohorts. The estimated vaccine efficacy against Covid-19 was 36.8% (95% CI, 12.5 to 54.0) among 2-to-5-year-olds and 50.6% (95% CI, 21.4 to 68.6) among 6-to-23-month-olds, at a time when B.1.1.529 (omicron) was the predominant circulating variant., Conclusions: Two 25-μg doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine were found to be safe in children 6 months to 5 years of age and elicited immune responses that were noninferior to those in young adults. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; KidCOVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04796896.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Data on medium-term outcomes in indivduals with myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination are scarce. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes and quality of life at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults., Methods: In this follow-up surveillance study, we conducted surveys in US individuals aged 12-29 years with myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, for whom a report had been filed to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System between Jan 12 and Nov 5, 2021. A two-component survey was administered, one component to patients (or parents or guardians) and one component to health-care providers, to assess patient outcomes at least 90 days since myocarditis onset. Data collected were recovery status, cardiac testing, and functional status, and EuroQol health-related quality-of-life measures (dichotomised as no problems or any problems), and a weighted quality-of-life measure, ranging from 0 to 1 (full health). The EuroQol results were compared with published results in US populations (aged 18-24 years) from before and early on in the COVID-19 pandemic., Findings: Between Aug 24, 2021, and Jan 12, 2022, we collected data for 519 (62%) of 836 eligible patients who were at least 90 days post-myocarditis onset: 126 patients via patient survey only, 162 patients via health-care provider survey only, and 231 patients via both surveys. Median patient age was 17 years (IQR 15-22); 457 (88%) patients were male and 61 (12%) were female. 320 (81%) of 393 patients with a health-care provider assessment were considered recovered from myocarditis by their health-care provider, although at the last health-care provider follow-up, 104 (26%) of 393 patients were prescribed daily medication related to myocarditis. Of 249 individuals who completed the quality-of-life portion of the patient survey, four (2%) reported problems with self-care, 13 (5%) with mobility, 49 (20%) with performing usual activities, 74 (30%) with pain, and 114 (46%) with depression. Mean weighted quality-of-life measure (0·91 [SD 0·13]) was similar to a pre-pandemic US population value (0·92 [0·13]) and significantly higher than an early pandemic US population value (0·75 [0·28]; p<0·0001). Most patients had improvements in cardiac diagnostic marker and testing data at follow-up, including normal or back-to-baseline troponin concentrations (181 [91%] of 200 patients with available data), echocardiograms (262 [94%] of 279 patients), electrocardiograms (240 [77%] of 311 patients), exercise stress testing (94 [90%] of 104 patients), and ambulatory rhythm monitoring (86 [90%] of 96 patients). An abnormality was noted among 81 (54%) of 151 patients with follow-up cardiac MRI; however, evidence of myocarditis suggested by the presence of both late gadolinium enhancement and oedema on cardiac MRI was uncommon (20 [13%] of 151 patients). At follow-up, most patients were cleared for all physical activity (268 [68%] of 393 patients)., Interpretation: After at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, most individuals in our cohort were considered recovered by health-care providers, and quality of life measures were comparable to those in pre-pandemic and early pandemic populations of a similar age. These findings might not be generalisable given the small sample size and further follow-up is needed for the subset of patients with atypical test results or not considered recovered., Funding: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests MEO reports a grant from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). BC reports a Clinical and Translational Science grant from NIH and participation on the data and safety advisory board for Astellas. EBW reports a grant from Moderna, Pfizer, Sequiris, and NIH, and participation on the data and safety advisory board for Vaxcyte and Iliad Biotechnologies., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pediatric patients have increasing rates of hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (HA-VTE), and while several risk-prediction models have been developed, few are designed to assess all general pediatric patients, and none has been shown to improve patient outcomes when implemented in routine clinical care., Methods: The Children's Likelihood Of Thrombosis (CLOT) trial is an ongoing pragmatic randomized trial being conducted starting November 2, 2020, in the inpatient units at Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt in Nashville, TN, USA. All admitted patients who are 21 years of age and younger are automatically enrolled in the trial and randomly assigned to receive either the current standard-of-care anticoagulation practice or the study intervention. Patients randomized to the intervention arm are assigned an HA-VTE risk probability that is calculated from a validated VTE risk-prediction model; the model is updated daily with the most recent clinical information. Patients in the intervention arm with elevated risk (predicted probability of HA-VTE ≥ 0.025) have an additional review of their clinical course by a team of dedicated hematologists, who make recommendations including pharmacologic prophylaxis with anticoagulation, if appropriate. The anticipated enrollment is approximately 15,000 patients. The primary outcome is the occurrence of HA-VTE. Secondary outcomes include initiation of anticoagulation, reasons for not initiating anticoagulation among patients for whom it was recommended, and adverse bleeding events. Subgroup analyses will be conducted among patients with elevated HA-VTE risk., Discussion: This ongoing pragmatic randomized trial will provide a prospective assessment of a pediatric risk-prediction tool used to identify hospitalized patients at elevated risk of developing HA-VTE.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04574895. Registered on September 28, 2020. Date of first patient enrollment: November 2, 2020., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) is a common side effect of antibiotics. We examined the gastrointestinal microbiota in children treated with β-lactams for community-acquired pneumonia. Data were from 66 children (n = 198 samples), aged 6-71 months, enrolled in the SCOUT-CAP trial (NCT02891915). AAD was defined as ≥1 day of diarrhea. Stool samples were collected on study days 1, 6-10, and 19-25. Samples were analyzed using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing to identify associations between patient characteristics, microbiota characteristics, and AAD (yes/no). Nineteen (29%) children developed AAD. Microbiota compositional profiles differed between AAD groups (permutational multivariate analysis of variance, P < .03) and across visits (P < .001). Children with higher baseline relative abundances of 2 Bacteroides species were less likely to experience AAD. Higher baseline abundance of Lachnospiraceae and amino acid biosynthesis pathways were associated with AAD. Children in the AAD group experienced prolonged dysbiosis (P < .05). Specific gastrointestinal microbiota profiles are associated with AAD in children., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. V. G. F. reports personal consultancy fees from Novartis, Novadigm, Durata, Debiopharm, Genentech, Achaogen, Affinium, The Medicines Co, Cerexa, Tetraphase, Trius, MedImmune, Bayer, Theravance, Basilea, Affinergy, Janssen, xBiotech, Contrafect, Regeneron, Basilea, Destiny, Amphliphi Biosciences. Integrated Biotherapeutics; C3J, Armata, Valanbio, Akagera, and Aridis; reports grants from NIH, MedImmune, Allergan, Pfizer, Advanced Liquid Logics, Theravance, Novartis, Merck, Medical Biosurfaces, Locus, Affinergy, Contrafect, Karius, Genentech, Regeneron, Basilea, and Janssen; has received royalties from UpToDate and stock options from Valanbio; has a patent pending in sepsis diagnostics; has received educational fees from Green Cross, Cubist, Cerexa, Durata, Theravance, and Debiopharm; and has received an editor’s stipend from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. C. B. C. reports personal consultancy fees from Astellas, Vir Biotechnology, Horizon Therapeutics, Altimmune, and Premier Healthcare; grants from Merck and GSK; and royalties from UpToDate. J. M. reports grants from the NIH and Merck and consultancy fees from Merck. W. C. H. is a member of the Endpoint Adjudication Committee for Pfizer and an advisory board member for ADMA Biologics and has stock in Pfizer, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, and Zimmer Biomet. E. B. W. has received research support from Pfizer and Moderna and has served on the scientific advisory board for Vaxcyte. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Within 2 years after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccines were developed, rigorously evaluated in large phase 3 trials, and administered to more than 5 billion individuals globally. However, adverse events of special interest (AESIs) have been described post-implementation, including myocarditis after receipt of messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome after receipt of adenoviral vector vaccines. AESIs are rare (<1 to 10/100 000 vaccinees) and less frequent than COVID-19 complications, though they have associated morbidity and mortality. The diversity of COVID-19 vaccine platforms (eg, mRNA, viral vector, protein) and rates of AESIs both between and within platforms (eg, higher rate of myocarditis after mRNA-1273 vs BNT162b2 vaccines) present an important opportunity to advance vaccine safety science. The International Network of Special Immunization Services has been formed with experts in vaccine safety, systems biology, and other relevant disciplines to study cases of AESIs and matched controls to uncover the pathogenesis of rare AESIs and inform vaccine development., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. K. A. T. reports funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Public Health Agency of Canada for safety evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines and grants from GlaxoSmithKline outside the submitted work. O. L. is a named inventor on patents relating to adjuvants and human in vitro systems that predict vaccine safety assessments and reports grants for the Precision Vaccines Program from the Boston Children’s Hospital Department of Pediatrics and the Chief Scientific Office and consulting fees from Moody’s analytics. C. B. C. reports grants and contracts from the NIH and CDC for vaccine clinical trials including NIH Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (including the Moderna COVE study, Janssen ENSEMBLE study, Moderna KidCOVE study) and CDC Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Network; grants from Merck; royalties for contributions to the UpToDate program; multiple small honoraria for lectures on COVID-19 vaccines and other vaccines; consultation fees from Altimmune (COVID-19 vaccine development), Janssen (respiratory syncytial virus vaccine development), Astellas (clinical trial data and safety monitoring board), Horizon Pharma (consultation related to care of children with chronic granulomatous disease), and Vir (influenza monoclonal antibody development); payment for expert testimony from multiple legal firms for general medical malpractice; US patent 10,981,979 B2; and serving as the president of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. K. G. reports grants from the Task Force for Global Health and the CDC via the Global Vaccine Data Network for sentinel surveillance and personal fees from the CDC via the Global Vaccine Data Network for vaccine safety training materials. C. L. C. reports a grant from GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, for vaccine safety surveillance and serving as a member of the Brighton Collaboration Scientific committee and the Institutional Biosafety committee. G. A. P. reports funding from ICW Ventures and the NIH (AI 48793, AI 33144, and AI 132348); consulting fees from Contec, Inc, 3D Communications, AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Bank of America Corporation, Eli Lily and Company, Emergent BioSolutions, Exelixis Inc, ExpertConnect, Genevant Sciences, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Global Services, LLC, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Medicago USA, Medscape, LLC, Merck, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Sanofi Pasteur SA, Syneos Health, and Vyriad; and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for 3D Communications, AstraZeneca UK Ltd, Bavarian Nordic A/S, Dynavax Technologies, Genentech, Inc, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Global Services, LLC, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. N. C. reports a Medical Research Future Fund grant and serving on a government advisory committee for the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation-ATAGI. B. C. reports a CDC grant and serving as a board member for the Rare Disease Foundation. R. T. C. reports grants from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation and the CDC; travel support from Elsevier; honoraria payments from the Brighton Collaboration; serving as the scientific director at the Brighton Collaboration; and serving as a co-lead on the COVAX Vaccine Safety Working Group. All remaining authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

In this issue of Cell Host & Microbe, Tsai et al. (2022) provide evidence that Staphylococcus aureus should be numbered among the pathogens for which original antigenic sin governs subsequent immune responses. Their approach may restore the utility of murine models in staphylococcal vaccine development., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The author was a site investigator on the Merck V710 vaccine trial referenced in the work and has served as a consultant on staphylococcal vaccine development to GSK, Pfizer, Novadigm, and Novartis. He is a co-inventor for a human monoclonal antibody for S. aureus (US Patent No. 10981979)., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Coinfections are more common in patients with cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis. Infiltrates on imaging studies are seen more commonly in patients with coinfections, but coinfections did not affect treatment outcomes of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium complex., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: Vaccination of children to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is an urgent public health need. The safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in children 6 to 11 years of age are unknown., Methods: Part 1 of this ongoing phase 2-3 trial was open label for dose selection; part 2 was an observer-blinded, placebo-controlled expansion evaluation of the selected dose. In part 2, we randomly assigned children (6 to 11 years of age) in a 3:1 ratio to receive two injections of mRNA-1273 (50 μg each) or placebo, administered 28 days apart. The primary objectives were evaluation of the safety of the vaccine in children and the noninferiority of the immune response in these children to that in young adults (18 to 25 years of age) in a related phase 3 trial. Secondary objectives included determination of the incidences of confirmed Covid-19 and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, regardless of symptoms. Interim analysis results are reported., Results: In part 1 of the trial, 751 children received 50-μg or 100-μg injections of the mRNA-1273 vaccine, and on the basis of safety and immunogenicity results, the 50-μg dose level was selected for part 2. In part 2 of the trial, 4016 children were randomly assigned to receive two injections of mRNA-1273 (50 μg each) or placebo and were followed for a median of 82 days (interquartile range, 14 to 94) after the first injection. This dose level was associated with mainly low-grade, transient adverse events, most commonly injection-site pain, headache, and fatigue. No vaccine-related serious adverse events, multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, myocarditis, or pericarditis were reported as of the data-cutoff date. One month after the second injection (day 57), the neutralizing antibody titer in children who received mRNA-1273 at a 50-μg level was 1610 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1457 to 1780), as compared with 1300 (95% CI, 1171 to 1443) at the 100-μg level in young adults, with serologic responses in at least 99.0% of the participants in both age groups, findings that met the prespecified noninferiority success criterion. Estimated vaccine efficacy was 88.0% (95% CI, 70.0 to 95.8) against Covid-19 occurring 14 days or more after the first injection, at a time when B.1.617.2 (delta) was the dominant circulating variant., Conclusions: Two 50-μg doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine were found to be safe and effective in inducing immune responses and preventing Covid-19 in children 6 to 11 years of age; these responses were noninferior to those in young adults. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; KidCOVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04796896.)., (Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Background: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a hyperinflammatory condition associated with antecedent SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the USA, reporting of MIS-C after vaccination is required under COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorisations. We aimed to investigate reports of individuals aged 12-20 years with MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination reported to passive surveillance systems or through clinician outreach to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)., Methods: In this surveillance activity, we investigated potential cases of MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination reported to CDC's MIS-C national surveillance system, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (co-administered by CDC and the US Food and Drug Administration), and CDC's Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project. A multidisciplinary team adjudicated cases by use of the CDC MIS-C definition. Any positive SARS-CoV-2 serology test satisfied case criteria; although anti-nucleocapsid antibodies indicate previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, anti-spike protein antibodies indicate either past or recent infection or COVID-19 vaccination. We describe the demographic and clinical features of cases, stratified by laboratory evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. To calculate the reporting rate of MIS-C, we divided the count of all individuals meeting the MIS-C case definition, and of those without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, by the number of individuals aged 12-20 years in the USA who received one or more COVID-19 vaccine doses up to Aug 31, 2021, obtained from CDC national vaccine surveillance data., Findings: Using surveillance results from Dec 14, 2020, to Aug 31, 2021, we identified 21 individuals with MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination. Of these 21 individuals, median age was 16 years (range 12-20); 13 (62%) were male and eight (38%) were female. All 21 were hospitalised: 12 (57%) were admitted to an intensive care unit and all were discharged home. 15 (71%) of 21 individuals had laboratory evidence of past or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, and six (29%) did not. As of Aug 31, 2021, 21 335 331 individuals aged 12-20 years had received one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, making the overall reporting rate for MIS-C after vaccination 1·0 case per million individuals receiving one or more doses in this age group. The reporting rate in only those without evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0·3 cases per million vaccinated individuals., Interpretation: Here, we describe a small number of individuals with MIS-C who had received one or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine before illness onset; the contribution of vaccination to these illnesses is unknown. Our findings suggest that MIS-C after COVID-19 vaccination is rare. Continued reporting of potential cases and surveillance for MIS-C illnesses after COVID-19 vaccination is warranted., Funding: US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Imaging plays an integral role in the evaluation of suspected musculoskeletal infections in children, not only in the accurate identification of infection such as osteomyelitis or septic arthritis, but also in guiding management. Various diagnostic modalities serve different purposes in the assessment of suspected pediatric musculoskeletal infections. The purpose of this document is to provide imaging guidance in the most frequently encountered clinical scenarios in which osteomyelitis and/or septic arthritis are suspected, outside of the axial skeleton. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is often treated with 10 days of antibiotics. Shorter treatment strategies may be effective and lead to less resistance. The impact of duration of treatment on the respiratory microbiome is unknown. Data are from children ( n  = 171), ages 6 to 71 months, enrolled in the SCOUT-CAP trial (NCT02891915). Children with CAP were randomized to a short (5 days) versus standard (10 days) beta-lactam treatment strategy. Throat swabs were collected at enrollment and the end of the study and used for shotgun metagenomic sequencing. The number of beta-lactam and multidrug efflux resistance genes per prokaryotic cell (RGPC) was significantly lower in children receiving the short compared to standard treatment strategy at the end of the study (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P  < 0.05 for each). Wilcoxon effect sizes were small for beta-lactam ( r : 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.29) and medium for multidrug efflux RGPC ( r : 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.37). Analyses comparing the resistome at the beginning and end of the trial indicated that in contrast to the standard strategy group, the resistome significantly differed in children receiving the short course strategy. Relative abundances of commensals such as Neisseria subflava were higher in children receiving the standard strategy, and Prevotella species and Veillonella parvula were higher in children receiving the short course strategy. We conclude that children receiving 5 days of beta-lactam therapy for CAP had a significantly lower abundance of antibiotic resistance determinants than those receiving standard 10-day treatment. These data provide an additional rationale for reductions in antibiotic use when feasible. IMPORTANCE Antibiotic resistance is a major threat to public health. Treatment strategies involving shorter antibiotic courses have been proposed as a strategy to lower the potential for antibiotic resistance. We examined relationships between the duration of antibiotic treatment and its impact on resistance genes and bacteria in the respiratory microbiome using data from a randomized controlled trial of beta-lactam therapy for pediatric pneumonia. The randomized design provides reliable evidence of the effectiveness of interventions and minimizes the potential for confounding. Children receiving 5 days of therapy for pneumonia had a lower prevalence of two different types of resistance genes than did those receiving the 10-day treatment. Our data also suggest that children receiving longer durations of therapy have a greater abundance of antibiotic resistance genes for a longer period of time than do children receiving shorter durations of therapy. These data provide an additional rationale for reductions in antibiotic use.

Background and Objectives: Asthma is considered a precaution for use of quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) in persons aged ≥5 years because of concerns for wheezing events. We evaluated the safety of LAIV4 in children with asthma, comparing the proportion of children with asthma exacerbations after LAIV4 or quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4)., Methods: We enrolled 151 children with asthma, aged 5 to 17 years, during 2 influenza seasons. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive IIV4 or LAIV4 and monitored for asthma symptoms, exacerbations, changes in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), and changes in the asthma control test for 42 days after vaccination., Results: We included 142 participants in the per-protocol analysis. Within 42 days postvaccination, 18 of 142 (13%) experienced an asthma exacerbation: 8 of 74 (11%) in the LAIV4 group versus 10 of 68 (15%) in the IIV4 group (LAIV4-IIV4 = -0.0390 [90% confidence interval -0.1453 to 0.0674]), meeting the bounds for noninferiority. When adjusted for asthma severity, LAIV4 remained noninferior to IIV4. There were no significant differences in the frequency of asthma symptoms, change in PEFR, or childhood asthma control test/asthma control test scores in the 14 days postvaccination between LAIV4 and IIV4 recipients. Vaccine reactogenicity was similar between groups, although sore throat (P = .051) and myalgia (P <.001) were more common in the IIV4 group., Conclusions: LAIV4 was not associated with increased frequency of asthma exacerbations, an increase in asthma-related symptoms, or a decrease in PEFR compared with IIV4 among children aged 5 to 17 years with asthma., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: The authors report no financial conflicts of interest relevant to this work. Dr. Creech reports receipt of a research grant from Merck Vaccines, personal fees for consultation for Astellas, Horizon Pharma, Altimmune, Janssen, Vir, and Premier Healthcare (unrelated to current work), and royalties from UpToDate (unrelated to current work). Dr. Walter reports serving as principal investigator for Pfizer-funded studies of COVID-19 vaccines, co-investigator for a vaccine study funded by Moderna, and an advisory board member for Vaxcyte (unrelated to current work)., (Copyright © 2022 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)

Importance: Childhood community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is usually treated with 10 days of antibiotics. Shorter courses may be effective with fewer adverse effects and decreased potential for antibiotic resistance., Objective: To compare a short (5-day) vs standard (10-day) antibiotic treatment strategy for CAP in young children., Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial in outpatient clinic, urgent care, or emergency settings in 8 US cities. A total of 380 healthy children aged 6 to 71 months with nonsevere CAP demonstrating early clinical improvement were enrolled from December 2, 2016, to December 16, 2019. Data were analyzed from January to September 2020., Intervention: On day 6 of their originally prescribed therapy, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 5 days of matching placebo or 5 additional days of the same antibiotic., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the end-of-treatment response adjusted for duration of antibiotic risk (RADAR), a composite end point that ranks each child's clinical response, resolution of symptoms, and antibiotic-associated adverse effects in an ordinal desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR). Within each DOOR rank, participants were further ranked by the number of antibiotic days, assuming that shorter antibiotic durations were more desirable. Using RADAR, the probability of a more desirable outcome was estimated for the short- vs standard-course strategy. In a subset of children, throat swabs were collected between study days 19 and 25 to quantify antibiotic resistance genes in oropharyngeal flora., Results: A total of 380 children (189 randomized to short course and 191 randomized to standard course) made up the study population. The mean (SD) age was 35.7 (17.2) months, and 194 participants (51%) were male. Of the included children, 8 were Asian, 99 were Black or African American, 234 were White, 32 were multiracial, and 7 were of unknown or unreported race; 33 were Hispanic or Latino, 344 were not Hispanic or Latino, and 3 were of unknown or unreported ethnicity. There were no differences between strategies in the DOOR or its individual components. Fewer than 10% of children in either strategy had an inadequate clinical response. The short-course strategy had a 69% (95% CI, 63-75) probability of a more desirable RADAR outcome compared with the standard-course strategy. A total of 171 children were included in the resistome analysis. The median (range) number of antibiotic resistance genes per prokaryotic cell (RGPC) was significantly lower in the short-course strategy compared with the standard-course strategy for total RGPC (1.17 [0.35-2.43] vs 1.33 [0.46-11.08]; P = .01) and β-lactamase RGPC (0.55 [0.18-1.24] vs 0.60 [0.21-2.45]; P = .03)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, among children responding to initial treatment for outpatient CAP, a 5-day antibiotic strategy was superior to a 10-day strategy. The shortened approach resulted in similar clinical response and antibiotic-associated adverse effects, while reducing antibiotic exposure and resistance., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02891915.

Importance: Vaccination against COVID-19 provides clear public health benefits, but vaccination also carries potential risks. The risks and outcomes of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination are unclear., Objective: To describe reports of myocarditis and the reporting rates after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination in the US., Design, Setting, and Participants: Descriptive study of reports of myocarditis to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) that occurred after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine administration between December 2020 and August 2021 in 192 405 448 individuals older than 12 years of age in the US; data were processed by VAERS as of September 30, 2021., Exposures: Vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Reports of myocarditis to VAERS were adjudicated and summarized for all age groups. Crude reporting rates were calculated across age and sex strata. Expected rates of myocarditis by age and sex were calculated using 2017-2019 claims data. For persons younger than 30 years of age, medical record reviews and clinician interviews were conducted to describe clinical presentation, diagnostic test results, treatment, and early outcomes., Results: Among 192 405 448 persons receiving a total of 354 100 845 mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines during the study period, there were 1991 reports of myocarditis to VAERS and 1626 of these reports met the case definition of myocarditis. Of those with myocarditis, the median age was 21 years (IQR, 16-31 years) and the median time to symptom onset was 2 days (IQR, 1-3 days). Males comprised 82% of the myocarditis cases for whom sex was reported. The crude reporting rates for cases of myocarditis within 7 days after COVID-19 vaccination exceeded the expected rates of myocarditis across multiple age and sex strata. The rates of myocarditis were highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males aged 12 to 15 years (70.7 per million doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine), in adolescent males aged 16 to 17 years (105.9 per million doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine), and in young men aged 18 to 24 years (52.4 and 56.3 per million doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine and the mRNA-1273 vaccine, respectively). There were 826 cases of myocarditis among those younger than 30 years of age who had detailed clinical information available; of these cases, 792 of 809 (98%) had elevated troponin levels, 569 of 794 (72%) had abnormal electrocardiogram results, and 223 of 312 (72%) had abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance imaging results. Approximately 96% of persons (784/813) were hospitalized and 87% (577/661) of these had resolution of presenting symptoms by hospital discharge. The most common treatment was nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (589/676; 87%)., Conclusions and Relevance: Based on passive surveillance reporting in the US, the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men. This risk should be considered in the context of the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination.

Competing Interests: POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Sallie Permar has received grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and collaborates with Merck Vaccines and Moderna on sponsored research programs on cytomegalovirus vaccines. She provides individual consulting services to Moderna, Merck, Dynavax, and Pfizer. Kathryn Edwards has received grant funding from the NIH and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and is a consultant to Bionet and IBM. She is also a member of the Data Safety and Monitoring Board for Sanofi, X-4 Pharma, Seqirus, Moderna, Pfizer, Merck, and Roche. Buddy Creech is a principal investigator for NIH-funded studies of the Moderna coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (adults and children) and Janssen COVID-19 vaccine and a member of a Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Astellas and has recently served as a consultant to Altimmune and Horizon Pharma (unrelated). He also receives royalties from UpToDate. Emmanuel Walter is a principal investigator for Pfizer-funded studies of COVID-19 vaccine (adults and children) and an NIH-funded study of the Astra Zeneca COVID-19 vaccine (adults), a coinvestigator for a vaccine study funded by Moderna, and a member of an advisory board for Vaxcyte.

Staphylococcus aureus is a common human commensal and the leading cause of diverse infections. To identify distinctive parameters associated with infection and colonization, we compared the immune and inflammatory responses of patients with a diagnosis of invasive S. aureus disease to healthy donors. We analyzed the inflammatory responses founding a pattern of distinctive cytokines significantly higher in the patients with invasive disease. The measure of antibody levels revealed a wide antibody responsiveness from all subjects to most of the antigens, with significantly higher response for some antigens in the invasive patients compared to control. Moreover, functional antibodies against toxins distinctively associated with the invasive disease. Finally, we examined the genomic variability of isolates, showing no major differences in genetic distribution compared to a panel of representative strains. Overall, our study shows specific signatures of cytokines and functional antibodies in patients with different primary invasive diseases caused by S. aureus . These data provide insight into human responses towards invasive staphylococcal infections and are important for guiding the identification of novel preventive and therapeutic interventions against S. aureus ., Competing Interests: All authors except GG, SC, IT, and CC are employees of the GSK group of companies. FB and IM hold shares and/or restricted shares in the GSK group of companies. GG was employed by the GSK group of companies during the conduct of this study and held stock options and stocks in the GSK group of companies as part of his employee remuneration. SC was employed by the GSK group of companies during the conduct of this study. FB holds pending and issued patents on S. aureus vaccine formulations. IM and RL are listed as inventor on patents owned by the GSK group of companies. BC has non-financial support from the University of Siena outside the submitted work. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declare that this study received funding from Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Srl. The funders had the following involvement with the study: study design, conduct, analysis and data interpretation., (Copyright © 2021 Leuzzi, Bodini, Thomsen, Soldaini, Bartolini, Muzzi, Clemente, Galletti, Manetti, Giovani, Censini, Budroni, Spensieri, Borgogni, Rossi Paccani, Margarit, Bagnoli, Giudice and Creech.)

This clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis (AHO) in children was developed by a multidisciplinary panel representing Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society (PIDS) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). This guideline is intended for use by healthcare professionals who care for children with AHO, including specialists in pediatric infectious diseases, orthopedics, emergency care physicians, hospitalists, and any clinicians and healthcare providers caring for these patients. The panel's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of AHO are based upon evidence derived from topic-specific systematic literature reviews. Summarized below are the recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of AHO in children. The panel followed a systematic process used in the development of other IDSA and PIDS clinical practice guidelines, which included a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of the evidence and strength of recommendation using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. A detailed description of background, methods, evidence summary and rationale that support each recommendation, and knowledge gaps can be found online in the full text., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections (SA-SSTIs) are common in healthcare and community settings, and recurrences occur at variable frequency, even after successful initial treatment. Knowing the exact burden and timing of recurrent disease is critical to planning and evaluating interventions to prevent recurrent SSTIs., Methods: In this retrospective study, SSTI cases in patients aged ≥18 years at 3 US medical centers (Columbia, Chicago, Vanderbilt) between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed according to a biennial cohort design. Index SSTIs (with or without key comorbidities), either microbiologically confirmed to be SA-SSTI or not microbiologically tested (NMT-SSTI), were recorded within 1 calendar year and followed up for 12 months for recurrent infections. The number of index cases, proportion of index cases with ≥1 recurrence(s), time to first recurrence, and number of recurrences were collected for both SA-SSTI and NMT-SSTI events., Results: In the most recent cohorts, 4755 SSTI cases were reported at Columbia, 2873 at Chicago, and 6433 at Vanderbilt. Of these, 452, 153, and 354 cases were confirmed to be due to S. aureus. Most cases were reported in patients without key comorbidities. Across centers, 16.4%-19.0% (SA-SSTI) and 11.0%-19.2% (NMT-SSTI) of index cases had ≥1 recurrence(s). In patients without key comorbidities, more than 60% of index SSTIs with recurrences had only 1 recurrence, half of which occurred in the first 3 months following primary infection., Conclusions: SA-SSTI recurrences are common among healthy adults and occur in at least 1 in 6 individuals during the 1 year following the primary event., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

While adult clinical trials of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines have moved quickly into phase 3 clinical trials, clinical trials have not started in children in the United States. The direct COVID-19 impact upon children is greater than that observed for a number of other pathogens for which we now have effective pediatric vaccines. Additionally, the role of children in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission has clearly been underappreciated. Carefully conducted phase 2 clinical trials can adequately address potential COVID-19 vaccine safety concerns. Delaying phase 2 vaccine clinical trials in children will delay our recovery from COVID-19 and unnecessarily prolong its impact upon children's education, health, and emotional well-being, and equitable access to opportunities for development and social success. Given the potential direct and indirect benefits of pediatric vaccination, implementation of phase 2 clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines should begin now., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To understand the epidemiology of acute hematogenous osteomyelitis and septic arthritis, including clinical and demographic features, microbiology, treatment approaches, treatment-associated complications, and outcomes., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study of 453 children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis and/or septic arthritis from 2009 to 2015., Results: Among the 453 patients, 218 (48%) had acute hematogenous osteomyelitis, 132 (29%) had septic arthritis, and 103 (23%) had concurrent acute hematogenous osteomyelitis/septic arthritis. Treatment failure/recurrent infection occurred in 41 patients (9%). Patients with concurrent acute hematogenous osteomyelitis/septic arthritis had longer hospital stays, longer duration of antibiotic therapy, and were more likely to have prolonged bacteremia and require intensive care. Staphylococcus aureus was identified in 228 (51%) patients, of which 114 (50%) were methicillin-resistant S aureus. Compared with septic arthritis, acute hematogenous osteomyelitis and concurrent acute hematogenous osteomyelitis/septic arthritis were associated with higher odds of treatment failure (OR, 8.19; 95% CI, 2.02-33.21 [P = .003]; and OR, 14.43; 95% CI, 3.39-61.37 [P < .001], respectively). The need for more than 1 surgical procedure was also associated with higher odds of treatment failure (OR, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.18-7.52; P = .021). Early change to oral antibiotic therapy was not associated with treatment failure (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.24-1.74; P = .386). Most (73%) medically attended treatment complications occurred while on parenteral therapy., Conclusions: Musculoskeletal infections are challenging pediatric infections. S aureus remains the most common pathogen, with methicillin-resistant S aureus accounting for 25% of all cases. Concurrent acute hematogenous osteomyelitis/septic arthritis is associated with more severe disease and worse outcomes. Fewer treatment-related complications occurred while on oral therapy. Early transition to oral therapy was not associated with treatment failure., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)