Search

This chapter is the central part of the book and is a comprehensive analysis of the Court Martial. It describes the functions of the main players, the process for bringing accused persons to trial, preliminary proceedings, and the trial itself. Importantly for the newcomer to the Service Justice System it includes a step-by-step guide to the order of procedure in the Court Martial. It also describes other proceedings: sentencing, variation (slip rule), appellate, activation, and ancillary.

This chapter considers all appeals and reviews available in the Service Justice System: review of summary dealings by commanding officers; the summary appeal court dealing with appeals from the commanding officer; reviews of punishments awarded to service persons under sentence at the military corrective training centre; appeals from the service civilian court to the Court Martial and the Court Martial appeal court.

This chapter deals with all matters related to bringing accused persons to trial. It covers arrest, stop and search, the legal basis for entry into private property; search and seizure; and custody. It includes investigation of offences and charging and legal aid provided to accused persons. Finally, the chapter reviews all miscellaneous orders, notably restraining orders and orders relating to civilians subject to Service discipline

This book is the most comprehensive analysis of the Service Justice System and is an essential guide for practitioners in the Court Martial and Service Courts. Since the publication of the third edition there have been three quinquennial reviews of the Service Justice System. This fourth edition provides a comprehensive update and reflects the changes introduced by the Armed Forces Acts 2011, 2016, and 2021. As well as providing practical and technical information, it also provides insights into, and commentary on, the rationale for changes. The most significant changes have been introduced by the 2021 Act but not all have been brought into force. A new chapter 10 summarizes those changes, cross referencing the law as it currently stands, so that the book will remain relevant as, and when, they are introduced.

This chapter summarizes the principles of sentencing in Service Courts, the powers of punishment in the summary process and the various sentence available in the Court Martial. It has a comprehensive section on sentencing guidelines applicable to Service Courts and includes guidance on sentencing civilians subject to Service discipline.

Over 90 per cent of persons who are alleged to have committed offences in the Service Justice System are dealt with summarily by their commanding officers. This chapter explains the personalities in the summary system, the investigation, charging, and mode of trial. It has a step-by-step guide to summary hearings, the powers of punishment of commanding officers and the post-trial review system.

Some civilians are subject to Service discipline and this chapter explains the jurisdiction or person, place, and time. It reviews the Service Civilian Court and ancillary proceedings in that court

This chapter has not changed from the 3rd edition because there have been no significant challenges to the Service Justice System since 2003. It charts the history of human rights challenges to the Court Martial with abstracts from the important cases. The most significant case which led to wholesale changes was Findlay v UK and the last, which determined that the Court Martial was compliant with Article 6 ECHR, was Cooper v UK. Both of these cases, together with many others, provide a comprehensive description and analysis of the human rights challenges and UK government’s reactions to those challenges.

The jurisdiction of Service Courts and a description of the Court Martial, the role and function of the judge advocate, and the relationship with lay members.

A short historical summary of the Court Martial and its development to set the modern Service Justice System in context. Each Service had a separate system until they were combined into a single system of Service Law by the Armed Forces Act 2006. The chapter explains why a separate system of Service Law is necessary and provides the rationale accepted by the UK Government before providing an overview of the current system.

This is a new chapter which covers the Armed Forces Act 2021. Many sections of the Act are not yet in force but this chapter guides the practitioner through the changes which are expected to be introduced over the next few years. It cross-references the current law in the rest of the book so that practitioners will be able to research the current and future law.

Introduction This study aimed to estimate the causal effect of face-to-face learning on student performance in anatomy, compared to online learning, by analysing examination marks under a causal structure. Methods We specified a causal graph to indicate how the mode of learning affected student performance. We sampled purposively to obtain end-semester examination marks of undergraduate and postgraduate students who learned using face-to-face (pre-COVID, 2019) or online modes (post-COVID, 2020). The analysis was informed by the causal graph. Marks were compared using linear regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess if effects were robust to unmeasured confounding. Results On average, face-to-face learning improved student performance in the end-semester examination in undergraduate students (gain of mean 8.3%, 95% CI 3.3 to 13.4%; E-value 2.77, lower limit of 95% CI 1.80) but lowered performance in postgraduate students (loss of 8.1%, 95% CI 3.6 to 12.6%; E-value 2.89, lower limit of 95% CI 1.88), compared to online learning. Discussion Under the assumed causal graph, we found that compared to online learning, face-to-face learning improved student performance in the end-semester examination in undergraduate students, but worsened student performance in postgraduate students. These findings suggest that different modes of learning may suit different types of students. Importantly, this is the first attempt to estimate causal effects of the mode of learning on student performance under a causal structure. This approach makes our assumptions transparent, informs data analysis, and is recommended when using observational data to make causal inferences.

Managing student participation is a key interactional and instructional task in any classroom. This is even more relevant in language classrooms, as students need to demonstrate understanding, know...

Following Shilling’s arguments on body pedagogics in sociology, we show how the negotiation of epistemic concerns is central to our understanding of practices of embodied interaction. Using conversation analytic methods, we examine audio and visual data from recordings of tuition in the Alexander Technique to accomplished amateur musicians. Our analysis builds on previous research on the body in pedagogic contexts, and focuses on embodied and discourse practices through which imperceptible changes to the body are warranted, the management of recruitment and agreement to embodied change, and the use of embodied mimicry. We position our approach as a rapprochement between the concerns of the sociology of the body and interactional studies of embodied action.

Purpose: To summarise measurement properties of translated versions of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and to assess their methodological quality. Methods: Relevant studies testing measurement properties of translated versions of the SPADI in non-specific shoulder pain participants were included from 11 databases (August 2020). Two reviewers independently screened articles and assessed individual measurement property risk of bias using the COSMIN checklist as very good, adequate, doubtful or inadequate. For each measurement property results were pooled and rated sufficient, insufficient, or inconsistent. Synthesised evidence was graded as high, moderate, low or very low (GRADE approach). Results: Thirty-four studies (21 languages and 26 different versions) were included from 4402 articles. A total of 141 measurement properties were reported with 60 rated as very good or adequate. These included; internal consistency (19), test-retest reliability (4), construct validity (6), structural validity (10), measurement error (5), responsiveness (9), and cross-cultural validity (2). Comprehensibility was adequate in the Chinese, German, Nepali, Spanish and Urdu versions. Only the Danish, Dutch and Nepali versions confirmed all, or all but one, of their measurement properties with sound methodology. Pooled results of all measurement properties except structural validity were rated as sufficient. Quality of evidence was graded moderate to high with downgrading due to inconsistent results. Conclusion: Overall evidence suggests the SPADI is valid, reliable and responsive in translated form but less than half the measurement properties tested were of adequate quality. Further testing is required in many languages particularly in; test-retest reliability, measurement error and construct validity.

Purpose The Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Quick-DASH, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) are frequently used instruments in shoulder functional assessment. They are available in Nepali and all but the PSFS has been validated for shoulder assessment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to validate the Nepali PSFS in shoulder pain patients and to compare validity, reliability, and responsiveness of all four instruments to provide a recommendation for their use. Method Patients attending physiotherapy completed the Nepali PSFS at baseline and follow-up (1–3 weeks). It was tested for reliability using internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), construct validity by hypothesis testing and responsiveness by anchor-based method using Area Under the Curve (AUC). The instruments were compared based on reported measurement properties and patients’ preference. Results 156 patients enrolled at baseline and 121 at follow-up. The PSFS showed sufficient reliability (α = 0.70, ICC = 0.82), construct validity (all three hypotheses met) and responsiveness (AUC = 0.83). Measurement property comparison demonstrated adequate reliability and validity, while PSFS was the most responsive instrument. Patients favoured the verbal rating scale of the DASH/Quick-DASH. The DASH had a lower completion rate for ‘culturally sensitive’ and ‘uncommon’ activities. Conclusion The Nepali PSFS is a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument in shoulder functional assessment. The combined use of the Quick-DASH or SPADI with the PSFS is recommended for a comprehensive assessment of Nepali shoulder pain patients in clinical and research settings. They are shorter, more appropriate to the Nepali context and provide balanced self-evaluation.

In this article, a dance metaphor is developed to deepen our understanding of the material, sensual, processual, and experiential potential of digital data relations. Premised upon Blumer’s notion of a sensitising concept, ballroom dance theory is applied to everyday use of the Apple Watch so as to prompt investigation of subtle interactional features of device use. The aim is to engender an inclusive umbrella concept while simultaneously stimulating questions of analysis of and access to small-scale and intimate moments of embodied behaviours in future interactional analysis. In so doing, the article contributes to the sociology of data relationality in everyday life, as well as constituent approaches such as science and technology studies and the interactional study of bodies and machines.

This paper analyses talk and touch in interaction in a musical masterclass setting. It shows how sequences of touch and talk enable the public evaluation and instruction of internal body experience...

In various ways the movement and experience of the body is instructed by others. This may be in the dance class or on the playing field. In these interactions, one person claims knowledge of the other’s body and rights to instruct how that body functions, moves, and feels. By undertaking a close analysis of embodied and spoken interaction within performance training sessions from a multimodal conversation analytic perspective, this paper will identify one kind of broad sequential trajectory – from intimate contact to public display - that shows how an instructor claims rights over the internal workings of another’s body by traversing different levels of proximity and sensorial modalities.

Purpose: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Meaurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures have been translated into many languages and have been shown to have strong measurement properties across a wide range of clinical conditions. However, Nepali translations of the PROMIS short forms are not yet available. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the PROMIS Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, Pain Behavior, Depression, and Sleep Disturbance short forms into Nepali.Methods: We used the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) translation methodology, which incorporated two forward translations, synthesis of the translations, a back-translation, and three independent reviews, harmonization, cognitive debriefing, revisions, and proof reading. The translation and review teams were fluent in Nepali and English and represented five different countries and four continents. We evaluated the short forms for comprehensibility and relevance (two key aspects of the content validity of an instrument), conducting cognitive debriefing with six adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in compliance with recommendations by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). The final version was proofread by two native Nepali speakers before and three new proofreaders after cognitive debriefing.Results: All five short forms were successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted into Nepali while maintaining equivalence to the source.Conclusions: The translation and review team, along with a sample from the target population with chronic musculoskeletal pain and the proofreaders considered all five PROMIS short forms relevant and comprehensible. An important next step is to evaluate the measurement properties of these instruments.

There is a long history of the science of intelligent machines and its potential to provide scientific insights have been debated since the dawn of AI. In particular, there is renewed interest in the role of AI in research and research policy as an enabler of new methods, processes, management and evaluation which is still relatively under-explored. This empirical paper explores interviews with leading scholars on the potential impact of AI on research practice and culture through deductive, thematic analysis to show the issues affecting academics and universities today. Our interviewees identify positive and negative consequences for research and researchers with respect to collective and individual use. AI is perceived as helpful with respect to information gathering and other narrow tasks, and in support of impact and interdisciplinarity. However, using AI as a way of ‘speeding up—to keep up’ with bureaucratic and metricised processes, may proliferate negative aspects of academic culture in that the expansion of AI in research should assist and not replace human creativity. Research into the future role of AI in the research process needs to go further to address these challenges, and ask fundamental questions about how AI might assist in providing new tools able to question the values and principles driving institutions and research processes. We argue that to do this an explicit movement of meta-research on the role of AI in research should consider the effects for research and researcher creativity. Anticipatory approaches and engagement of diverse and critical voices at policy level and across disciplines should also be considered.

Multiple-choice (MC) anatomy "spot-tests" (identification-based assessments on tagged cadaveric specimens) offer a practical alternative to traditional free-response (FR) spot-tests. Conversion of the two spot-tests in an upper limb musculoskeletal anatomy unit of study from FR to a novel MC format, where one of five tagged structures on a specimen was the answer to each question, provided a unique opportunity to assess the comparative validity and reliability of FR- and MC-formatted spot-tests and the impact on student performance following the change of test format to MC. Three successive year cohorts of health science students (n = 1,442) were each assessed by spot-tests formatted as FR (first cohort) or MC (following two cohorts). Comparative question difficulty was assessed independently by three examiners. There were more higher-order cognitive skill questions and more of the course objectives tested in the MC-formatted tests. Spot-test reliability was maintained with Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficients ≥ 0.80 and 80% of the MC items of high quality (having point-biserial correlation coefficients > 0.25). These results also demonstrated guessing was not an issue. The mean final score for the MC-formatted cohorts increased by 4.9%, but did not change for the final theory examination that was common to all three cohorts. Subgroup analysis revealed that the greatest change in spot-test marks was for the lower-performing students. In conclusion, our results indicate spot-tests formatted as MC are suitable alternatives to FR tests. The increase in mean scores for the MC-formatted spot-tests was attributed to the lower demand of the MC format.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Meaurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures have been translated into many languages and have been shown to have strong measurement properties across a wide range of clinical conditions. However, Nepali translations of the PROMIS short forms are not yet available. The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the PROMIS Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, Pain Behavior, Depression, and Sleep Disturbance short forms into Nepali.We used the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) translation methodology, which incorporated two forward translations, synthesis of the translations, a back-translation, and three independent reviews, harmonization, cognitive debriefing, revisions, and proof reading. The translation and review teams were fluent in Nepali and English and represented five different countries and four continents. We evaluated the short forms for comprehensibility and relevance (two key aspects of the content validity of an instrument), conducting cognitive debriefing with six adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in compliance with recommendations by the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). The final version was proofread by two native Nepali speakers before and three new proofreaders after cognitive debriefing.All five short forms were successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted into Nepali while maintaining equivalence to the source.The translation and review team, along with a sample from the target population with chronic musculoskeletal pain and the proofreaders considered all five PROMIS short forms relevant and comprehensible. An important next step is to evaluate the measurement properties of these instruments.

Calibration of neuromusculoskeletal models using functional tasks is performed to calculate subject-specific musculotendon parameters, as well as coefficients describing the shape of muscle excitation and activation functions. The objective of the present study was to employ a neuromusculoskeletal model of the shoulder driven entirely from muscle electromyography (EMG) to quantify the influence of different model calibration strategies on muscle and joint force predictions. Three healthy adults performed dynamic shoulder abduction and flexion, followed by calibration tasks that included reaching, head touching as well as active and passive abduction, flexion and axial rotation, and submaximal isometric abduction, flexion and axial rotation contractions. EMG data were simultaneously measured from 16 shoulder muscles using surface and intramuscular electrodes, and joint motion evaluated using video motion analysis. Muscle and joint forces were calculated using subject-specific EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal models that were uncalibrated and calibrated using (i) all calibration tasks (ii) sagittal plane calibration tasks, and (iii) scapular plane calibration tasks. Joint forces were compared to published instrumented implant data. Calibrating models across all tasks resulted in glenohumeral joint force magnitudes that were more similar to instrumented implant data than those derived from any other model calibration strategy. Muscles that generated greater torque were more sensitive to calibration than those that contributed less. This study demonstrates that extensive model calibration over a broad range of contrasting tasks produces the most accurate and physiologically relevant musculotendon and EMG-to-activation parameters. This study will assist in development and deployment of subject-specific neuromusculoskeletal models.