Search

PDF file, 156K, Histopathological characterization of the tumor samples.

PDF file, 923K, Comparison of gene expression between primary tumor sample, early and late xenograft sample.

PDF file, 129K, Table S1: Description of sequenced exons. Table S2: tumor growth observed in the first engraftment. Table S3: Tumor samples for which development of metastasis has been observed after an engraftment into the cecum. Table S4: Ontology analysis of gene differentially expressed between patient tumors and xenografts.

CCR Translation for This Article from Characterization of a Large Panel of Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts Representing the Clinical Heterogeneity of Human Colorectal Cancer

Purpose: Patient-derived xenograft models are considered to represent the heterogeneity of human cancers and advanced preclinical models. Our consortium joins efforts to extensively develop and characterize a new collection of patient-derived colorectal cancer (CRC) models.Experimental Design: From the 85 unsupervised surgical colorectal samples collection, 54 tumors were successfully xenografted in immunodeficient mice and rats, representing 35 primary tumors, 5 peritoneal carcinoses and 14 metastases. Histologic and molecular characterization of patient tumors, first and late passages on mice includes the sequence of key genes involved in CRC (i.e., APC, KRAS, TP53), aCGH, and transcriptomic analysis.Results: This comprehensive characterization shows that our collection recapitulates the clinical situation about the histopathology and molecular diversity of CRC. Moreover, patient tumors and corresponding models are clustering together allowing comparison studies between clinical and preclinical data. Hence, we conducted pharmacologic monotherapy studies with standard of care for CRC (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and cetuximab). Through this extensive in vivo analysis, we have shown the loss of human stroma cells after engraftment, observed a metastatic phenotype in some models, and finally compared the molecular profile with the drug sensitivity of each tumor model. Through an experimental cetuximab phase II trial, we confirmed the key role of KRAS mutation in cetuximab resistance.Conclusions: This new collection could bring benefit to evaluate novel targeted therapeutic strategies and to better understand the basis for sensitivity or resistance of tumors from individual patients. Clin Cancer Res; 18(19); 5314–28. ©2012 AACR.

PDF file, 241K, Frequency of abnormalities detected by aCGH among all samples tested across the genome.

PDF file, 67K, Hierarchical clustering of 82 tumors based on Chromosomal abnormalities analyzed by 244k aCGH.

PDF file, 72K.

PDF - 115K, upplemental Figure 1. Activation of CD4+ T cells by CatmAb in mixed lymphocyte tumor cocultures. Supplemental Figure 2. Activation of CD8+ T cells by CatmAb in mixed lymphocyte tumor cocultures. Supplemental Figure 3. Activation of NK cells by CatmAb in mixed lymphocyte tumor cocultures.

Introduction This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of appendicular epithelial tumors (AT) and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) published in March 2020, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) ( www.tncd.org ). Methods All French medical societies specialized in the management of AT and PMP collaboratively established these recommendations based on literature until December 2019 and the results of a Delphi vote carried out by the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International experts, and graded into 4 categories (A, B, C, Expert Agreement) according to their level of evidence. Results AT and PMP are rare but represent a wide range of clinico-pathological entities with several pathological classification systems and different biological behaviors. Their treatment modalities may vary accordingly and range from simple surveillance or laparoscopic appendectomy to complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and / or systemic chemotherapy. The prognosis of these neoplasms may also largely vary according to their pathological grade and spreading at diagnosis or during the follow-up. Given the rarity of certain situations, the therapeutic strategy adapted to each patient, must be discussed in a specialized multidisciplinary meeting after a specialized pathological and radiological pre-therapeutic assessment and a clinical examination by a surgeon specializing in the management of rare peritoneal malignancies. Conclusion These recommendations are proposed to achieve the most beneficial strategy in a daily practice as the wide range and the rareness of these entities renders their management challenging. These guidelines are permanently being reviewed.

Introduction: The PRODIGE 7-trial investigated the additional value of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). The results of PRODIGE 7 were presented at the 2018 ASCO meeting showing that 30 min oxaliplatin-based HIPEC did not improve overall survival. The current study investigated the impact of PRODIGE 7 on the worldwide practice of CRS and HIPEC. Materials and methods: CRS-HIPEC experts from 19 countries were invited through the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) to complete an online survey concerning the current CRS-HIPEC practice in their hospital and country, and were asked to appraise the effect of PRODIGE 7. Results: The survey was completed by 18/19 experts. Although their personal opinions of CRS-HIPEC were barely influenced by PRODIGE 7, they reported a substantial impact on daily practice. This included a switch towards Mitomycin-C based HIPEC-regimens and prolongation of HIPEC perfusion time, a reduction in the number of referrals from non-HIPEC centers, a reduction in national consensus, the removal of HIPEC from national guidelines, and a reduced reimbursement rate. Conclusion: The PRODIGE 7 has had a major impact on the practice of CRS-HIPEC for CPM worldwide. HIPEC remains an attractive option with potential for control and eradication of disease and further studies into the optimal HIPEC-regimen are urgently needed. Meanwhile, given the complexity of the treatment of patients with CPM, and the proven benefits of optimal CRS, referral of patients with potentially resectable CPM to expert centers is recommended whilst the precise role of HIPEC is further evaluated. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Background The incidence of gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) is increasing. The prognosis for patients with peritoneal metastases remains poor and the role of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is controversial. The aim was to clarify the impact of gastric PCC with peritoneal metastases treated by CRS with or without HIPEC. Methods All patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer treated with CRS with or without HIPEC, in 19 French centres, between 1989 and 2014, were identified from institutional databases. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes were compared between PCC and non-PCC subtypes, and the possible benefit of HIPEC was assessed. Results In total, 277 patients were included (188 PCC, 89 non-PCC). HIPEC was performed in 180 of 277 patients (65 per cent), including 124 of 188 with PCC (66 per cent). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.7 (95 per cent c.i. 12.7 to 17.3) months in the PCC group versus 21.2 (14.7 to 36.4) months in the non-PCC group (P Conclusion In selected patients, CRS-HIPEC offers acceptable outcomes among those with gastric PCC and long survival for patients without PCC.

International audience; Objective: To perform a retrospective root-cause analysis of postoperative death after CRS and HIPEC procedures. Background: The combination of CRS and HIPEC is an effective therapeutic strategy to treat peritoneal surface malignancies, however it is associated with significant postoperative mortality. Methods: All patients treated with a combination of CRS and HIPEC between January 2009 and December 2018 in 22 French centers and died in the hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Perioperative data of the 101 patients were collected by a local senior surgeon with a sole junior surgeon. Three independent experts investigated the typical root cause of death and provided conclusions on whether postoperative death was preventable (PREV group) or not (NON-PREV group). A typical root cause of preventable postoperative death was classified on a cause-and-effect diagram. Results: Of the 5562 CRS+HIPEC procedures performed, 101 in-hospital deaths (1.8%) were identified, of which a total of 18 patients of 70 years old and above and 20 patients with ASA score of 3. Etiology of peritoneal disease was mainly colorectal. A total of 54 patients (53%) were classified in the PREV group and 47 patients (47%) in the NON-PREV group. The results of the study show that in the PREV group, WHO performance status 1-2 was more frequent and the Median Peritoneal Cancer Index was higher compared with those of the NON-PREV group. The cause of death in the PREV group was classified as: (i) preoperatively for debatable indication (59%), (ii) intraoperatively (30%) and (iii) postoperatively in 17 patients (31%). A multifactorial cause of death was found in 11 patients (20%). Conclusion: More than half of the postoperative deaths after combined CRS and HIPEC may be preventable, mainly by following guidelines regarding preoperative selection of the patients and adequate intraoperative decisions.

Background Multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma (MCPM) is a rare, slowly growing, condition prone to recur after surgery. The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) added to complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) remains controversial and difficult to assess. As patients are mostly reproductive age women, surgical approach, and fertility considerations are important aspects of the management. This observational retrospective review aimed to accurate treatment strategy reflections. Methods The RENAPE database (French expert centers network) was analyzed over a 1999–2019 period. MCPM patients treated with CRS were included. A special focus on HIPEC, mini-invasive approach, and fertility considerations was performed. Results Overall 60 patients (50 women) were included with a median PCI of 10 (4–14) allowing 97% of complete surgery, followed by HIPEC in 82% of patients. A quarter of patients had a laparoscopic approach. Twelve patients (20%) recurred with a 3-year recurrence free survival of 84.2% (95% confidence interval 74.7–95.0). The hazard of recurrence was numerically reduced among patients receiving HIPEC, however, not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.41, 0.12–1.42, p = 0.200). A severe post-operative adverse event occurred in 22% of patients with five patients submitted to a subsequent reoperation. Among four patients with a childbearing desire, three were successful (two had a laparoscopic-CRS-HIPEC and one a conventional CRS without HIPEC). Conclusion MCPM patients treatment should aim at a complete CRS. The intraoperative treatment options as laparoscopic approach, fertility function sparing and HIPEC should be discussed in expert centers to propose the most appropriate strategy.

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment in patients with peritoneal metastases is complex. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are under debate. The aim of this study was to assess the consensus among international experts for decision-making regarding CRS/HIPEC in CRC patients. Materials and methods Twelve of 15 experts provided their decision algorithms for CRS/HIPEC for patients with or at high risk for peritoneal metastases from CRC. Based on the objective consensus methodology, the results were transformed into decision trees, which then provided information on the consensus and discordance. Results There was only one scenario in which the consensus on performing HIPEC reached 100%, which was when treating young patients with complete cytoreduction and a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) of less than 16 in the presence of certain risk factors (RFs). Five major decision criteria were identified and displayed: age, PCI, completeness of cytoreduction (CC), extent of extraperitoneal metastases (EoM) and, in the case of nonverified extraperitoneal metastases, further RFs. There was consensus to refrain from using HIPEC in older patients with a high PCI, and the consensus further increased when addressing incomplete cytoreduction and extensive EoM. Conclusion A definite consensus concerning the use of HIPEC was only determined for very selected scenarios. These findings can be used for general guidance, but due to the heterogeneity of each individual situation and the impracticality to present this information through decision trees, as well as the unclear future of the role of HIPEC in the adjuvant setting, a one-on-one transfer to daily clinical practice cannot be achieved.

To report the current clinical practice of French physicians for metachronous resectable liver metastasis (LM) occurring after a FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy for primary cancer. Twenty four clinical situations were proposed to a panel of experts via 4 learned societies. Clinical situations varied according time of recurrence (early between 6 and 12 month or > 12 month), extension of LM (limited ≤ 2 or extended > 2 lesions), presence of a neuropathy or not, and of a RAS or BRAF mutation. A total of 157 physicians participated in this study. A consensus was reached in 17 (71%) clinical situations. For an early limited recurrence, whatever presence of neuropathy, the preferred therapeutic approach (45%) was upfront surgery. For an early extended recurrence, whatever presence of neuropathy, there was a consensus (64%) for a preoperative chemotherapy by FOLFIRI + biologic agent. For a late recurrence without neuropathy, there was a consensus (50%) for a preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy, whatever the extension of LM. For a late recurrence with neuropathy, upfront surgery was chosen (52%) for limited LM, and preoperative chemotherapy by FOLFIRI + biologic agent (73%) for extended LM. No response was influenced by the RAS mutation status. There was a strong consensus for intensified preoperative chemotherapy in all clinical situations for BRAF-mutated LM. This national survey provides an overview of the practice patterns in the treatment of LM occurring after adjuvant FOLFOX for primary. It could be a basis to establish expert’s recommendations for the clinical practice.

Introduction: Peritoneal metastases from neuroendocrine tumors are associated with a bad prognosis. The objective of our study was to evaluate whether surgical resection could lead to prolonged survival in selected patients. This survival was compared to that of patients operated for liver metastasis. Methods: From our prospectively maintained database we included 88 patients who underwent the complete resection of peritoneal and/or liver metastasis between January 1995 and December 2016 in Gustave-Roussy. Three resection groups were compared: peritoneal metastasis alone, liver metastasis alone, and the combined resection of liver and peritoneal metastases. Results: The median peritoneal cancer index was 10 in the peritoneal group and 11 in the peritoneal + liver group. The 5-year overall survival was 81% (60–100) in the peritoneal group compared to 78% (65.2–92.8) in the liver group, and 72% (58.7–89.7) in the peritoneal + liver group (p = 0.71). The 3-year disease-free survival reached 26.9% (16.1–45.1) in the liver group, 12.5% (2.3–68.2) in the peritoneal group, and 32.4% (19.9–52.6) in the combined liver + peritoneal group (p = 0.45). In the univariate analysis, the prognosis factors for a longer survival were: small bowel primary tumor origin, low preoperative chromogranin A level, and tumor grade ≤1. Conclusion: Despite a high recurrence rate, long-term overall survival can be achieved after the resection of peritoneal metastasis in selected patients. This survival is comparable to that of patients operated for liver metastasis only. Surgery should stand as a standard treatment for peritoneal metastases in patients with resectable disease.

Resume L’adenocarcinome gastrique (AG) est, au niveau mondial, le 5e cancer le plus frequent, la decroissance de son incidence semble se stabiliser en France. Vingt-cinq experts reunis sous l’egide de l’Association francaise de chirurgie ont collabore a la redaction de ce referentiel dedie a la prise en charge chirurgicale de l’AG. Concernant le bilan pre-therapeutique, la realisation d’une echo-endoscopie chez tous les patients candidats a une exerese chirurgicale (afin de preciser le statut ganglionnaire) et d’une cœlioscopie exploratrice en cas d’AG cT3/T4 et/ou N+ a la recherche d’une carcinose peritoneale a ete retenue. Cependant, le TEP-scanner ne devrait pas etre realise systematiquement mais uniquement lorsque les autres modalites diagnostiques sont insuffisantes. La laparotomie reste la voie d’abord de choix pour la realisation d’une gastrectomie totale ou partielle avec curage ganglionnaire D2 pour les lesions > T2N0. Il est recommande de faire un reservoir jejunal sur anse-en-Y pour le retablissement de continuite apres gastrectomie totale afin de limiter le risque de dumping syndrome et de reflux œsophagien. En cas de carcinose peritoneale sur AG avec PCI limite (≤ 7) chez un patient en bon etat general et dont la maladie est controlee par chimiotherapie, il faut probablement realiser une cytoreduction macroscopiquement complete avec chimiotherapie hyperthermique intraperitoneale en centre expert. Une gastrectomie avec curage D2 peut etre envisagee en cas de cirrhose uniquement si Child A. La realisation d’une gastrectomie palliative a visee symptomatique ou une derivation chirurgicale en cas d’obstruction distale de l’estomac chez un patient en bon etat general peuvent etre envisagees.

Resume En cas de diagnostic de metastases peritoneales (accord fort des experts) : i) prendre avis aupres d’une RCP ayant une forte experience en pathologie du peritoine (reseau BIG RENAPE), ii) Transfert ou non du patient a une equipe referente de la CHIP, selon proposition de la RCP. Concernant la chimiotherapie systemique (accord fort des experts) : i) elle est realisee en pre et postoperatoire, ii) Pour une duree totale n’excedant pas 6 mois, iii) pas d’anti-angiogenique en postoperatoire. Concernant la chirurgie d’exerese (accord fort des experts) : i) elle doit etre radicale menee par mediane xyphopubienne, ii) pas de cytoreduction par cœlioscopie. Une CHIP peut etre proposee en dehors d’un essai par une equipe referente de la CHIP (accord faible des d’expert) : i) Si l’exerese est radicale, ii) si la morbidite attendue est « raisonnable », iii) Si l’indication de CHIP a ete posee en RCP et iv) l’utilisation de la mitomycine est preferee a l’utilisation de la l’oxaliplatine qui est deconseillee pour cette indication.

It is not known whether perioperative chemotherapy, compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone, improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of neoadjuvant 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) on DFS in patients with upfront resectable CLM.Consecutive patients who presented with up to five resectable CLM at two Japanese and two French centres in 2008-2015 were included in the study. Both French institutions favoured perioperative FOLFOX, whereas the two Japanese groups systematically preferred upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox regression multivariable models were used to adjust for confounding. The primary outcome was DFS.Some 300 patients were included: 151 received perioperative chemotherapy and 149 had upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. The weighted 3-year DFS rate was 33·5 per cent after perioperative chemotherapy compared with 27·1 per cent after upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0·85, 95 per cent c.i. 0·62 to 1·16;Compared with adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative FOLFOX does not improve DFS in patients with resectable CLM, provided adjuvant chemotherapy is given successfully.Se desconoce si la quimioterapia perioperatoria en comparación con la quimioterapia adyuvante sola mejora la supervivencia libre de enfermedad (Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos que presentaban hasta cinco CLM resecables en dos centros japoneses y dos centros franceses entre 2008 a 2015. Ambas instituciones francesas favorecían FOLFOX perioperatorio, mientras que los dos grupos japoneses utilizaban sistemáticamente la cirugía de entrada y quimioterapia adyuvante. Se utilizaron la probabilidad inversa del tratamiento ponderado (Se incluyeron 300 pacientes (grupo de quimioterapia perioperatoriaEn comparación con la quimioterapia adyuvante, el FOLFOX perioperatorio no mejora la DFS en CLM resecables siempre y cuando la quimioterapia adyuvante se administre de forma efectiva.

Background Well differentiated papillary peritoneal mesothelioma (WDPPM) is a rare variant of mesothelioma which affects mainly women in the reproductive age. The disease may present multifocally and recur after primary resection. Our aim was to describe the outcomes of cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in this disease. Methods Patients with histological diagnosis of WDPPM were retrieved from the PSOGI registry. Demographical and clinical data were extracted as well as outcomes data (overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS)). Results We analyzed 45 patients for whom complete data was available. The majority of patients were women (n = 33, 73%) with a median age of 44 years. Preoperative chemotherapy (CT) was administered in 8 patients (18%). Median peritoneal carcinomatosis index was 9 (1–30), and complete cytoreduction was achieved in 69% of patients. There was one case (2%) of postoperative mortality, and 24% rate of severe morbidity. Overall, there were 4 deaths and 5 years OS was 80%. 8 patients (18%) had disease recurrence, all within 5 years from operation. On univariate analysis preoperative CT, high PCI and severe morbidity were associated with reduced RFS. On multivariate analysis, only preoperative CT (HR = 32.6, 95% CI: 2.39–446.2, p = 0.009) and high PCI (HR = 21.7, 95% CI: 1.11–425.7, p = 0.04) remained significant risk factors. Conclusions WDPPM can be a lethal disease with substantial recurrence even after aggressive treatment. Patients presenting with extensive disease or disease recurrence after surgical excision are at increased risk for relapse. CRS + HIPEC can be safely applied to WDPPM in specialized centers.

Summary Background The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery has been associated with encouraging survival results in some patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases who were eligible for complete macroscopic resection. We aimed to assess the specific benefit of adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery compared with receiving cytoreductive surgery alone. Methods We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 17 cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18–70 years and had histologically proven colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases, WHO performance status of 0 or 1, a Peritoneal Cancer Index of 25 or less, and were eligible to receive systemic chemotherapy for 6 months (ie, they had adequate organ function and life expectancy of at least 12 weeks). Patients in whom complete macroscopic resection or surgical resection with less than 1 mm residual tumour tissue was completed were randomly assigned (1:1) to cytoreductive surgery with or without oxaliplatin-based HIPEC. Randomisation was done centrally using minimisation, and stratified by centre, completeness of cytoreduction, number of previous systemic chemotherapy lines, and timing of protocol-mandated systemic chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin HIPEC was administered by the closed (360 mg/m2) or open (460 mg/m2) abdomen techniques, and systemic chemotherapy (400 mg/m2 fluorouracil and 20 mg/m2 folinic acid) was delivered intravenously 20 min before HIPEC. All individuals received systemic chemotherapy (of investigators' choosing) with or without targeted therapy before or after surgery, or both. The primary endpoint was overall survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received surgery. This trial is registed with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT00769405 , and is now completed. Findings Between Feb 11, 2008, and Jan 6, 2014, 265 patients were included and randomly assigned, 133 to the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 132 to the cytoreductive surgery alone group. After median follow-up of 63·8 months (IQR 53·0–77·1), median overall survival was 41·7 months (95% CI 36·2–53·8) in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 41·2 months (35·1–49·7) in the cytoreductive surgery group (hazard ratio 1·00 [95·37% CI 0·63–1·58]; stratified log-rank p=0·99). At 30 days, two (2%) treatment-related deaths had occurred in each group.. Grade 3 or worse adverse events at 30 days were similar in frequency between groups (56 [42%] of 133 patients in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group vs 42 [32%] of 132 patients in the cytoreductive surgery group; p=0·083); however, at 60 days, grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group (34 [26%] of 131 vs 20 [15%] of 130; p=0·035). Interpretation Considering the absence of an overall survival benefit after adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery and more frequent postoperative late complications with this combination, our data suggest that cytoreductive surgery alone should be the cornerstone of therapeutic strategies with curative intent for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Funding Institut National du Cancer, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique du Cancer, Ligue Contre le Cancer.

SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Pseudomyxoma Peritonei (PMP) and Peritoneal Mesothelioma (PM) are both rare peritoneal malignancies. Currently, affected patients may be treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy offering long-term survival or even cure in selected patients. However, many issues regarding the optimal treatment strategy are currently under debate. To aid physicians involved in the treatment of these patients in clinical decision making, the PSOGI executive committee proposed to create a consensus statement on PMP and PM. This manuscript describes the methodology of the consensus process. The Delphi technique is a reliable method for attaining consensus on a topic that lacks scientific evidence through multiple voting rounds which feeds back responses to the participants in between rounds. The GRADE system provides a structured framework for presenting and grading the available evidence. Separate questionnaires were created for PMP and PM and sent during two voting rounds to 80 and 38 experts, respectively. A consensus threshold of 51.0% was chosen. After the second round, consensus was reached on 92.9%-100.0% of the questions. The results were presented and discussed in the plenary session at the PSOGI 2018 international meeting in Paris. A third round for the remaining issues is currently in progress. In conclusion, using the Delphi technique and GRADE methodology, consensus was reached in many issues regarding the treatment of PM and PMP amongst an international panel of experts. The main results will be published in the near future.

The Covid-19 pandemic is profoundly changing the organization of healthcare access. This is particularly so for peritoneal neoplastic diseases, for which curative treatment mobilizes substantial personnel, operating room and intensive care resources. The BIG-RENAPE and RENAPE groups have made tentative proposals for prioritizing care provision. A tightening of the usual selection criteria is needed for curative care: young patients with few or no comorbidities and limited peritoneal extension. It is desirable to prioritize disease conditions for which cytoreduction surgery with or without associated hyperthermic intraoperative peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the gold-standard treatment, and for which systemic chemotherapy cannot be a temporary or long-term alternative: pseudomyxoma peritonei, resectable malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas, peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin if they are resectable and unresponsive to systemic chemotherapy after up to 12 courses, first-line ovarian carcinomatosis if resectable or in interval surgery after at most six courses of systemic chemotherapy. Addition of HIPEC must be discussed case by case in an expert center. The prioritization of indications must consider local conditions and the phase of the epidemic to allow optimal peri-operative care.

Resume La pandemie de COVID-19 modifie profondement l’organisation et l’acces aux soins, en particulier pour les pathologies neoplasiques peritoneales, dont la prise en charge curative mobilise des moyens importants en personnel, bloc operatoire et reanimation. Les groupes BIG-RENAPE et RENAPE proposent des pistes de reflexion et de priorisation pour leur prise en charge. Un renforcement des criteres habituels de selection est necessaire pour une prise en charge a visee curative : patients jeunes, avec peu de co-morbidites et une extension peritoneale limitee. Il est souhaitable de prioriser les pathologies pour lesquelles la chirurgie de cytoreduction associee ou non a une chimiohyperthermie intraperitoneale (CHIP) est le traitement de reference et celles pour lesquelles la chimiotherapie systemique ne peut etre une alternative temporaire ou prolongee : pseudomyxomes peritoneaux ; mesotheliomes peritoneaux malins resecables ; metastases peritoneales d’origine colorectale si resecables, non repondeuses a la chimiotherapie systemique et/ou apres 12 cures, carcinoses ovariennes en 1re intention si resecables et limitees ou en situation intervallaire apres un maximum de 6 cycles de chimiotherapie systemique. L’adjonction d’une CHIP devra etre discutee au cas par cas, en centre expert. La priorisation des indications devra prendre en consideration les conditions locales et la phase de la periode epidemique pour permettre une prise en charge peri-operatoire optimale.

Objectives: To assess the individual treatment strategies among international experts in peritoneal carcinosis, specifically their decision-making in the process of patient selection for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in women suffering from ovarian cancer, to identify relevant decision-making criteria, and to quantify the level of consensus for or against HIPEC. Methods: The members of the executive committee of the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI) were asked to describe the clinical conditions under which they would recommend HIPEC in patients with ovarian cancer and to describe any disease or patient characteristics relevant to their decision. All answers were then merged and converted into decision trees. The decision trees were then analyzed by applying the objective consensus methodology. Results: Nine experts in surgical oncology provided information on their multidisciplinary treatment strategy including HIPEC for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Three of the total of 12 experts did not perform HIPEC. Five criteria relevant to the decision on whether HIPEC is performed were applied. In patients with resectable disease, a peritoneal cancer index (PCI) Discussion and Conclusion: Among surgical oncology experts in peritoneal surface malignancy and HIPEC, HIPEC plays an important role in primary and recurrent ovarian cancer, and the PCI is the most important criterion in this decision.

Patients with borderline (BR) or locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) are often treated with induction FOLFIRINOX (FLX). However, the role of additional preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate its impact in patients who underwent resection after induction FLX. Retrospective analysis of prospective consecutive surgical BR or LA PAC patients after induction FLX in 23 French centers between November 2010 and December 2015, treated with or without preoperative additional CRT (FLX vs FLX + CRT groups). Two hundred three patients were included (106 BR, 97 LA PAC). Median number of FLX cycles was 6 (range 1–30); 50% (n = 102) of patients received additional CRT. Median duration between diagnosis and surgery was 5.4 and 8.7 months (P = 0.001) in the FLX and FLX + CRT group, respectively. The 90-day mortality, major complications, and pancreatic fistula rates were 4.4%, 17.7%, and 5.4%, respectively. After 45.1 months follow-up, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 45.4 months and 16.2 months, respectively. Patients with additional CRT had higher R0 resection rate (89.2% vs 76.3%; P = 0.017), ypN0 rate (76.2% vs 48.5%; P

The purpose of this study was to identify the predictive factors for ypN0 status in tumors with good pathologic response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT).A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients at two tertiary cancer center who underwent rectal resection after good response to CRT between 2000 and 2013.No preoperative treatment (oxaliplatin use, radiotherapy boost of 5,4 Gy, delay CRT-surgery) impacted on the ypN status. In the multivariate analysis, only a ypT3 (HR 7.5 [2,9-19.5]) was significant and no lymphovascular invasion (HR 8,9 [1.6-49.8]) was limited to significance.The best model predicting the ypN0 status used only the ypT status3. The major part (92.2%) of patients with ypT0-2 tumors had no LN invasion.The risk of lymph node involvement metastases was only 7.8% for the patients with an ypT0-2 status. A fullthickness transanal resection coud be the futur treatment of these patients.

Over the last 20 years, complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) dramatically increased the survival of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). However, despite better knowledge of the disease, around 70% of patients relapse after CRS with HIPEC. This study was designed to analyse the pattern of recurrence and the outcomes of different treatment modalities.Patients relapsing after CRS plus HIPEC for CRPM were selected from a prospective database. The impact of iterative curative-intent treatments was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression models.Between April 1993 and December 2014, 190 of 274 (69%) patients previously treated by CRS plus HIPEC developed relapse, as an isolated peritoneal recurrence (31%), isolated distant recurrence (35%), or multisite recurrence (34%). The curative-intent treatment rate was 48% for isolated peritoneal recurrences, 49% for isolated distant recurrences and 22% for multisite recurrences (p = 0.002). From the diagnosis of relapse, 3- and 5-year overall survival were 77% and 46% after curative-intent treatment and 14% and 4.7% after non-curative treatment, with median survival of 59.7 and 18.3 months (log-rank p 0.0001), respectively. Regression analysis identified the initial extent of CRPM (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.25; p 0.0001), iterative curative-intent treatment (HR: 0.22; p 0.0001) and disease-free interval (HR: 1.77; p = 0.01) as independent predictors of prolonged survival.Iterative curative-intent treatment can be performed in up to 40% of patients with relapse after CRS and HIPEC for CRPM, and is associated with prolonged survival in selected patients.

Background Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is a rare clinical condition characterized by mucinous ascites, typically related to appendiceal or ovarian tumours. Current standard treatment involves cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), but recurrences occur in 20-30 per cent of patients. The aim of this study was to define the timing and patterns of recurrence to provide a basis for modifying follow-up of these patients. Methods This observational study examined a prospectively developed multicentre national database (RENAPE working group) to identify patients with recurrence after optimal CRS and HIPEC for PMP. Postoperative complications, long-term outcomes and potential prognostic factors were evaluated. Results Of 1411 patients with proven PMP, 948 were identified who had undergone curative CRS and HIPEC. Among these patients, 229 first recurrences (24·2 per cent) were identified: 196 (20·7 per cent) occurred within the first 5 years (early recurrence) and 30 (3·2 per cent) occurred between 5 and 10 years. Three patients developed a first recurrence more than 10 years after the original treatment. The mean(s.d.) time to first recurrence was 2·36(2·21) years. Preoperative chemotherapy and high-grade pathology were significant factors for early recurrence. Overall survival for the entire group was 77·9 and 63·1 per cent at 5 and 10 years respectively. The principal site of recurrence was the peritoneum. Conclusion Recurrence of PMP was rare after 5 years and exceptional after 10 years.

Peritoneal metastases are the third most common site of recurrence of colorectal cancer. Diagnosis is difficult and often made at an advanced stage even on imaging. Curative treatment relies on complete cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), which dramatically improves survival in selected patients. Main prognostic factors are based on the extent of the peritoneal disease and the completeness of surgery. Therefore, identifying patients at high risk of developing peritoneal metastases with the aim of diagnosing and treating patients at an early stage appears crucial. Proactive attitude and prophylactic treatment based on HIPEC are being evaluated on clinical trials.

Background Complete cytoreductive surgery (CCRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a validated treatment in selected patients with peritoneal metastases (PM) of intestinal origin. There is an increased risk of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) and Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma (SBA) in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The feasibility and benefit of that surgical approach in IBD patients is unknown. Methods IBD patients with operated PM complicating CRC or SBA were extracted from a French national multicenter prospective database of patients who underwent surgery for PM in HIPEC expert centers from 1995 to 2016. IBD patients who underwent CCRS plus HIPEC were compared with a cohort of 234 patients who had the same surgery for sporadic colon cancer. Results 14 patients (male 57%, median age 40 years, 12 Crohn's disease) with CRC (n = 7) and SBA (n = 7) were included. CCRS followed by HIPEC (oxaliplatin 72.7%) was performed in 11 cases (median peritoneal cancer index 7; range 1–30). The control group had the same characteristics except an older age at HIPEC (56.52 vs 45.74; p = 0.003). Overall survival (HR = 4.47; 90% CI, 1.91 to 10.49), Relapse Free Survival (HR = 2.31; 90% CI, 1.17 to 4.56) and Peritoneal Recurrence Free Survival (HR = 3.30; 90% CI, 1.59 to 6.85) were significantly lower in IBD patients. Six of the 11 patients presented major surgical morbidity with no impact on post-operative treatment. Conclusion CCRS followed by HIPEC is less effective in IBD patients with resectable PM complicating CRC or SBA. More careful selection of those patients is needed.

Introduction: Diffuse gastric cancer is associated with poor prognosis. We report a patient with metastatic gastric linitis plastica harboring human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2) activating mutation and HER2 amplification. Case description: The patient received 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid and oxaliplatin combined with trastuzumab/pertuzumab, resulting in disease control for 8 months. Second-line therapy with nivolumab and trastuzumab/pertuzumab was well-tolerated, with macroscopic peritoneal response. Following ovarian progression and surgical resection of ovarian metastases, immunohistochemistry of PD-L1 was negative; proteomics demonstrated normal expression of HER2 and absence of PD-L1, while genomics showed HER2 amplification, suggesting mechanisms of escape to dual HER2 blockade by downregulation of HER2 and to nivolumab by the absence of PD-L1. Based upon this and nonexpression of biomarkers of taxane resistance, therapy was changed to paclitaxel. Two and a half years after diagnosis, the patient is undergoing treatment, with excellent performance status. Conclusions: Molecular analysis and personalized therapy can help optimize treatment in difficult-to-treat cancers.

Background Peritoneal metastases (PM), corresponding to tumor implants into the peritoneal cavity, are associated with impaired prognosis and low responsiveness to systemic chemotherapy. A new therapeutic approach has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients with PM from colorectal cancer (CRC), consisting in the association of a complete cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal chemotherapy associated to hyperthermia (HIPEC). Many drugs have been administered intraperitoneally, but no clear consensus has been approved. Therefore, relevant preclinical models are essentials for the efficient translation of treatments option into affected patients. Method Organoids, the last generation of preclinical models, were used to rationalize and improve intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We tested several cytotoxics, combination, effect of hyperthermia, exposure duration and frequency. Results Organoids were a representative model of response to chemotherapies used for the treatment of PM from CRC; 460 mg/m 2 of oxaliplatin being the most efficient cytotoxic treatment. Repeated incubations with oxaliplatin; mimicking cycles of intraperitoneal treatment, resulted in an increased efficacy. Conclusion & discussion Organoids are relevant models to study the chemosensitivity of peritoneal metastases from CRCs. These models could be used for large scale drug screening strategies or personalized medicine, for colorectal carcinoma but also for PM from other origins.

Background Epithelioid peritoneal malignant mesothelioma (EPMM) is the most common subtype of this aggressive tumor. We compared two antibodies against PD-L1, a recent theranostic biomarker, and evaluated the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression by mesothelial and immune cells in EPMM. Methods Immunohistochemistry was performed on 45 EPMM. Clinical and pathological data were extracted from the RENAPE database. Using E1L3N and SP142 clones, inter-observer agreement, PD-L1 expression by mesothelial and immune cells and inter-antibody agreement were evaluated. The prognostic relevance of PD-L1 expression was evaluated in 39 EPMM by univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Inter-observer agreement on E1L3N immunostaining was moderate for mesothelial and immune cells, and fair for mesothelial and poor for immune cells using SP142. Using E1L3N, 31.1% of mesothelial and 15.6% of immune cells expressed PD-L1, and 22.2% of mesothelial and 26.7% of immune cells using SP142. Inter-antibody agreement was moderate. In most positive cases, 1–5% of tumor cells were positive. Using E1L3N, PD-L1 expression by lymphocytes was associated with better OS and PFS by both univariate and multivariate analysis. Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy predicted better prognosis than other treatments. Solid subtype was an independent prognostic factor for worse OS. Conclusion E1L3N appeared easier to use than SP142 to evaluate PD-L1 expression. A minority of EPMM expressed PD-L1, and only a few cells were positive. PD-L1 expression by immune cells evaluated with E1L3N was an independent prognostic factor in EPMM.

This report aims to describe preliminary results concerning secondary resectability after bidirectional chemotherapy for initially unresectable malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). Between January 2013 and January 2016, 20 consecutive patients treated for diffuse MPM not suitable for upfront surgery received bidirectional chemotherapy associating intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy. Evaluation of the response to chemotherapy was assessed clinically and by laparoscopy. The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score at staging laparoscopy was 27 (range 15–39). Altogether, 118 intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles were administered without any specific adverse catheter-related event. Concerning tolerance, 85% of the patients experienced no pain or mild pain during chemotherapy administration. The clinical response rate was 60% after a median of three chemotherapy cycles. At laparoscopic reevaluation, the median PCI was 18 (range 0–35), and a secondary resectability was considered for 55% of the patients. Complete cytoreduction surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was finally achieved for 10 patients (50%), with a median intraoperative PCI score of 14 (range 6–30). After a median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2-year overall survival rate was 83.3% for the patients treated by CRS followed by HIPEC and 44% for the patients treated by bidirectional chemotherapy. Bidirectional chemotherapy is a promising, well-tolerated treatment capable of increasing the resection rate for selected patients with diffuse MPM initially considered as unresectable or borderline resectable. For patients with definitively unresectable disease, bidirectional chemotherapy achieves a higher clinical response rate.

Introduction This document is a summary of the French Intergroup guidelines regarding the management of anal carcinomas, published in November 2016. Methods It is a collaborative work produced under the auspices of the majority of the French medical societies involved in the management of anal cancer. It is based on the previous guidelines published in 2010. Recommendations are graded in three categories, according to the amount of evidence found in the literature. Results Non-metastatic anal carcinomas can be divided into two risk groups, according to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or endorectal-ultrasonograpy. Localized small cancers (T1N0) are mainly treated by exclusive radiation therapy in the case of cancers of the anal canal, or by surgery in the case of cancers of the anal margin. The recommended treatment of locally advanced tumours (T2-T4, N0-N2) is definitive concomitant radio-chemotherapy. Salvage surgery should be reserved for patients with poor response, tumour progression or local relapse after radio-chemotherapy, or in cases of persistent vaginal fistula or total anal incontinence after the cessation of radio-chemotherapy. In the case of metastatic tumours, current therapeutic recommendations are based on less robust evidence; with chemotherapy playing a major role. Conclusion These recommendations are permanently being reviewed, and each individual case must be discussed inside a multidisciplinary team.

During the past 20 years, advances in systemic therapies have improved overall survival of patients with Colorectal cancer Liver metastases (CRLM) from 6 to 24 months. By reaching CRLM via their preferential arterial vascularization, hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated improvement in response rate and deepness of response. Improvement in deepness of response is potentially helpful to convert no surgical patient to surgery. Recent HAIC regimens, including HAIC-FUDR plus systemic oxaliplatin/irinotecan, or HAIC-oxaliplatin plus systemic 5FU and cetuximab yielded a 92% and 90% response rate respectively, and conversion to R0 surgery in 47% and 42% of patients, respectively. When HAIC delivered a drug ineffective through intravenous delivery, this rechallenge provided 62% response rate for HAIC. Nowadays, port-catheter implanted percutaneously by radiologists has 95% feasibility with primary patency equivalent to that of surgically implanted catheters, and secondary patency superior after radiologic revision. Retrospective studies demonstrated prolonged DFS of HAIC over IV chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting after surgery of CRLM. Drug eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) were developed as drug carrier and embolization platform for treatment of CRLM by chemoembolization. DEBIRI allows for a very high level of SN-38 (SN-38 is the active compound of irinotecan) and a very high rate of complete l response at pathologic studies of treated metastases. DEBIRI was compared to systemic FOLFIRI in a phase III randomized trial including 74 patients with benefit in overall survival and disease-free survival.

Le eviscerazioni pelviche per cancro sono interventi tecnicamente complessi, tanto per l’exeresi quanto per la ricostruzione. Queste pelvectomie sono giustificate solo con un obiettivo curativo, attraverso l’ottenimento di una resezione completa, ampia, monoblocco e con margini sani (R0), e sono destinate a pazienti in buone condizioni generali. Questi interventi richiedono un bilancio preoperatorio accurato e completo e una perfetta conoscenza dell’anatomia pelvica, delle modificazioni locali indotte dal tumore e dai trattamenti precedenti e della prognosi della malattia. Essi fanno ricorso a tecniche di resezione oncologica e a tecniche urologiche, ginecologiche, digestive e plastiche riparative. Queste eviscerazioni sono all’origine di un’importante morbimortalita e di sequele funzionali che possono essere limitate con tecniche di ricostruzione d’organo e di riempimento pelviperineale.

Las exenteraciones pelvicas por cancer son intervenciones tecnicamente complejas tanto en lo referente a la exeresis como a la reconstruccion. Estas pelvectomias solo estan justificadas con un fin curativo mediante la obtencion de una reseccion completa, amplia, monobloque, con margenes sanos (R0) y se dirigen a pacientes con buen estado general. Estas intervenciones requieren una evaluacion preoperatoria precisa y exhaustiva, unos conocimientos perfectos de la anatomia pelvica, de las modificaciones locales causadas por el tumor y los tratamientos previos, asi como del pronostico de la enfermedad. En ellas se emplean tecnicas de reseccion oncologica, asi como tecnicas urologicas, ginecologicas, digestivas y plasticas reparadoras. Estas exenteraciones conllevan una morbimortalidad elevada y provocan secuelas funcionales que pueden limitarse con las tecnicas de reconstruccion de organos y de llenado pelviperineal.

Background Approximately 40% of colorectal cancer patients will develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The most effective approach to increase long-term survival is CRLM complete resection. Unfortunately, only 10–15% of CRLM are initially considered resectable. The objective response rates (ORR) after current first-line systemic chemotherapy (sys-CT) regimens range from 40 to 80% and complete resection rates (CRR) range from 25 to 50% in patients with initially unresectable CRLM. When CRLM patients are not amenable to complete resection after induction of sys-CT, ORRs obtained with second-line sys-CT are much lower (between 10 and 30%) and consequently CRRs are also low ( Objectives and endpoints of the phase II study Our main objective is to investigate the efficacy, in term of CRR (R0-R1), of treatment intensification in patients with liver-only CRLM not amenable to curative-intent resection (and/or ablation) after at least 2 months of induction sys-CT. Patients will receive either HAI oxaliplatin plus systemic FOLFIRI plus targeted therapy (i.e. anti-EGFR antibody or bevacizumab) or conventional sys-CT plus targeted therapy (i.e. anti-EGFR or antiangiogenic antibody). Secondary objectives are to compare: progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, depth of response, feasibility of delivering HAI oxaliplatin including HAI catheter-related complications, and toxicity (NCI-CTCAE v4.0). Methods This study is a multicenter, randomized, comparative phase II trial (power, 80%; two-sided alpha-risk, 5%). Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive HAI oxaliplatin combined with systemic FOLFIRI plus targeted therapy (experimental arm) or the best sys-CT plus targeted therapy on the basis of their first-line prior sys-CT history and current guidelines (control arm). One hundred forty patients are required to account for non-evaluable patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, (NCT03164655). Trial registration date: 11th May 2017.

International audience; Background: There is no consensual definition for gastric linitis plastica (GLP). We aim to construct a diagnostic score to distinguish this rare tumor from usual gastric adenocarcinomas.Methods: In this retrospective study, all patients who had gastrectomy for cancer between 2007 and 2017 in French tertiary centers were included. The outcome was a diagnosis of GLP based on pathological review of the surgical specimen. The diagnostic score was created by using variables that were most frequently associated with GLP using penalized logistic regression on multiply imputed datasets. We used discrimination measures to assess the performances of the score. Internal validation was perfomed using bootstrapping methods to correct for overoptimism.Results:220 patients including 71 linitis plastica (female 49%, median age 57 years) were analyzed. The six parameters retained in the diagnosis score were the presence of large folds and/or parietal thickening on at least one segment, pangastric infiltration and presence of gastric stenosis on the upper endoscopy, circumferential thickening on at least one segment and thickening of the third hyperechogenic layer on endoscopic ultrasound and the presence of signet ring cells on endoscopic biopsies. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.967 with a sensitivity of 94% [89.9-97.3] and a specificity of 88.7% [81.7-95.8] for a threshold of 2.75. After internal validation, the corrected AUC was 0.959.Conclusion: It’s the first study validating a pre-therapeutic diagnostic score (Saint-Louis linitis score) with an excellent ability to discriminate GLP from non-GLP adenocarcinomas. An external validation is necessary to confirm our data.