Search

In dermatology, lichenoid describes lesions with a violaceous hue that is a clinical reflection of basal cell damage in the epithelium and dense mononuclear infiltrate in the sub‐epithelium. The violaceous color results from pigment incontinence due to basal cell damage and the Tyndall effect. Although classically described in lichen planus, a lichenoid hue is noted in the oral mucosa in several other disorders that often lead to diagnostic dilemmas. Early and accurate diagnosis is important for the appropriate management of the underlying condition and prognostication. Dermatologists play a central role in managing such patients since, apart from the oral mucosa findings, the cutaneous features also help to significantly differentiate various conditions. Mimickers of oral lichen planus include nicotine stomatitis, oral submucous fibrosis, oral lichenoid lesions, mucosal discoid lupus erythematosus, pemphigus vulgaris, paraneoplastic pemphigus, mucous membrane pemphigoid, fixed drug eruption, plasma cell cheilitis/gingivitis, and erythema multiforme. While a detailed history and clinical examination can help reach a diagnosis in most cases, histopathology, immunofluorescence, and other relevant investigations help establish the diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pityriasis rosea is an acute, self‐limited exanthem that typically occurs in adolescence and young adulthood, classically featuring ovoid erythematous and scaly lesions on the trunk and proximal extremities. While its cause is not definitively known, the classic form of pityriasis rosea may result from the reactivation of latent human herpesvirus (HHV) infections (HHV‐6 and HHV‐7). Interestingly, drug eruptions that clinically and/or histopathologically resemble pityriasis rosea have also been reported. These pityriasis rosea‐like drug eruptions tend to occur at an older age and have a shorter duration than the classic type. As there are different management paradigms, the distinction between classic pityriasis rosea and the mimicking drug eruption is important to recognize. Herein, we report a case of a pityriasis rosea‐like drug eruption that occurred in association with imatinib mesylate treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. We also review the clinicopathologic features of reported cases of pityriasis rosea‐like drug eruption, including those due to imatinib. While the clinical morphology of the cutaneous drug‐related eruption mimics the lesions seen in classic pityriasis rosea, the presence of unique histopathologic findings, including necrotic keratinocytes, interface dermatitis, and eosinophils, may aid in distinction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Enfortumab vedotin (EV), a nectin‐4‐binding agent that affects microtubules, has become standard therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma. The agent, now given in combination with pembrolizumab, frequently induces cutaneous reactions. Here, we report a severe EV‐induced cutaneous eruption. A 58‐year‐old woman with metastatic urothelial carcinoma developed a rash after receiving simultaneous first doses of EV and pembrolizumab. The eruption began on the flank and spread to involve her trunk and extremities with prominent involvement of folds, including the axillae and medial thighs. Skin biopsy revealed extensive vacuolar alteration of the basal epidermis and numerous epidermal keratinocytic mitotic figures, often suprabasilar, including ring and "starburst" forms. The findings supported a diagnosis of EV‐induced eruption. With EV cessation and systemic corticosteroids, the rash resolved over a few weeks. Pembrolizumab was restarted as monotherapy, and the patient's cancer showed a significant radiographic treatment response at 3 months. An emerging literature of small series and case reports, largely from oncologic literature, presents the histopathology of EV‐induced cutaneous eruption as a vacuolar interface dermatitis with the inconsistently reported feature of arrested mitotic figures. This case study demonstrates distinctive clinical and histopathologic features of EV‐induced eruption, which may inform dermatologic and oncologic management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This document presents an algorithm for diagnosing and treating hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). It emphasizes the importance of consulting an allergist for accurate management and potential delabeling of patients with reported allergies to NSAIDs. The algorithm includes updated classifications of NSAID hypersensitivity reactions and outlines diagnostic methods such as drug provocation tests, skin tests, and basophil activation tests. The goal of the algorithm is to assist healthcare professionals in accurately diagnosing and managing NSAID hypersensitivity in patients. The text also discusses changes in the management of NSAID hypersensitivity reactions, including the inclusion of blended reactions in a new category and the delabeling of mild cutaneous reactions through a direct oral two-step test. The importance of clinical history and individualized approaches is emphasized, taking into account regional differences in drug consumption patterns and diagnostic test availability. The study was supported by various institutions and the authors have no conflicts of interest. [Extracted from the article]

The article discusses the impact of sulfonamide allergy labels on the risk of opportunistic infections after solid organ transplantation (SOT). SOT recipients with a sulfonamide allergy label were found to have an increased risk of Toxoplasma and Nocardia infections compared to those without the label. The study highlights the importance of reassessing sulfonamide allergy labels in SOT recipients to optimize prophylactic treatment and reduce the risk of opportunistic infections. Efforts should be made to identify safe delabeling strategies and promote the use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP‐SMX) in eligible SOT recipients. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Exanthematous drug eruption and infectious mononucleosis (IM) are both exanthematous diseases. Current research on exanthematous drug eruption and IM mainly targets identifying these disorders, the resulting differences at the metabolism level have not yet been systematically analyzed. Materials and methods: A total of 30 cases of exanthematous drug eruption and IM, 10 patients without exanthema and 10 healthy volunteers were enrolled, 3 mL of fasting venous blood was collected, the serum metabolite content was detected by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry metabolomics. Results: A total of 165 metabolites were identified, exhibiting significant differences in plasma metabolic trends between exanthematous drug eruption and IM, and pinpointed 28 potential biomarkers. Notable changes were seen in the metabolic activities of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA‐cycle), and galactose metabolism, characterized by increased levels of gluconate, gluconolactone, glucose, galactaric acid, and mannose, along with decreased amounts of pyruvic acid, succinic acid, malic acid, and glycerol, indicating an impairment in the exanthematous drug eruption group's capacity to endure oxidative stress and regulate energy metabolism. In contrast to its medication without rash counterpart, the exanthematous drug eruption group's plasma displayed distinct metabolic routes, predominantly in the processing of arginine and proline, along with the TCA. This resulted in a marked reduction in urea levels and a rise in pyruvate, citrate, and ornithine, indicating hypoxic stress as the primary cause of these rashes. In contrast to the healthy control group, the IM group showed 26 potential biomarkers, marked by increased levels of ketoglutaric acid, malic acid, pyruvic acid, and oxoglutaric acid, and reduced amounts of glutamine, galacturonic acid, arachidonic acid, trimethylphosphonic acid ester, gluconolactone, and indole acetic acid. Mainly, the metabolic pathways included the TCA, breaking down alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, and the processing of D‐glutamine and D‐glutamate metabolism, underscoring the body's crucial role in generating energy and inflammatory agents through the citric acid cycle. Conclusions: The comparison of serum metabolomic features of exanthematous drug eruptions and IM outlines a unique pattern closely related to the differences in the pathogenesis of these two exanthematous diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aseptic pustulosis involves inflammatory skin conditions with nonbacterial pustules on erythema, accompanied by neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration in the epidermis. Dysregulation of the interleukin (IL)-36 pathway leads to neutrophil aggregation and pustule formation. Variants in IL36RN , CARD14 , AP1S3 , MPO , SERPINA3 and BTN3A3 have been identified in generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) in the past. Some patients with acrodermatitis continua of Hallopeau (ACH), palmoplantar pustulosis and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) also exhibit mutations in IL36RN , CARD14 and AP1S3 , albeit with regional and population-specific variations. This study aims to explore a shared genetic foundation among those with aseptic pustulosis. We performed Sanger sequencing on six genes in 126 patients with aseptic pustulosis. Genetic analysis identified IL36RN variants strongly associated with ACH, AGEP and subcorneal pustular dermatosis (SPD). Immunohistochemistry revealed elevated inflammatory cytokines in all subtypes. This study establishes a significant association between IL36RN variants and ACH, AGEP and SPD, emphasizing the IL-1/IL-36–chemokine–neutrophil axis as a common pathogenic mechanism. Targeting this axis holds promise for therapeutic interventions for aseptic pustulosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses Grover's disease (GD) in oncologic patients and provides a systematic review of relevant literature. GD is a skin condition whose pathogenesis is not fully understood, but recent evidence suggests it may involve an overexpression of interleukin 4 (IL-4). The association between GD and malignancies, as well as between GD and systemic oncologic treatments, has been sporadically reported. The review includes 31 patients with GD, with the most strongly associated malignancies being metastatic melanoma and hematologic malignancies. Immunotherapy was the most common observed oncologic treatment. The article also discusses the histological features, comorbidities, and treatment options for GD. [Extracted from the article]

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, an infrequent adverse drug reaction, mainly results from drugs. Clinically, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis manifests as a high fever, with skin lesions of small monomorphic subcorneal sterile pustules on an erythematous that presents at 1-4 days after medication exposure. The incidence of acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis varies from 3/1, 000, 000 to 5/1, 000, 000, while the mortality rate is typically around 5%. We present a case of a 69-year-old female who developed a diffuse, erythematous, pustular rash over the entire body and exhibited a fever of 38.3°C after 4 days of icotinib therapy. Considering her medication history and the appearance of the lesions, she was diagnosed with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and received appropriate treatment. We also conducted a literature review through PubMed to compare similarities and differences between our case and those reported in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions are major causes of morbidity and mortality. The origin, phenotype, and function of pathogenic T cells across the spectrum of severity require investigation. We leveraged recent technical advancements to study skin-resident memory T cells (TRMs) versus recruited T cell subsets in the pathogenesis of severe systemic forms of disease, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and skin-limited disease, morbilliform drug eruption (MDE). Microscopy, bulk transcriptional profiling, and single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-Seq) plus cellular indexing of transcriptomes and epitopes by sequencing (CITESeq) plus T cell receptor sequencing (TCR-Seq) supported clonal expansion and recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells from circulation into skin along with expanded and nonexpanded cytotoxic CD8+ skin TRM in SJS/TEN. Comparatively, MDE displayed a cytotoxic T cell profile in skin without appreciable expansion and recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells from circulation, implicating TRMs as potential protagonists in skin-limited disease. Mechanistic interrogation in patients unable to recruit T cells from circulation into skin and in a parallel mouse model supported that skin TRMs were sufficient to mediate MDE. Concomitantly, SJS/TEN displayed a reduced Treg signature compared with MDE. DRESS demonstrated recruitment of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells into skin as in SJS/TEN, yet a pro-Treg signature as in MDE. These findings have important implications for fundamental skin immunology and clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but life-threatening skin lesion triggered by hypersensitive drug reaction. They are characterized by extensive epidermal necrosis and skin exfoliation. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus (FT1DM) is featured by a rapid-onset of hyperglycemia with ketoacidosis due to severely destroyed β-cell function. Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus as a sequela of SJS/TEN has rarely been reported. Case presentation: We present a 73-year-old female patient who developed SJS/TEN skin allergic reaction after taking carbamazepine and phenytoin for 35 days. Then, hyperglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis occurred 20 days after discontinuation of antiepileptic drugs. A very low serum C-peptide level (8.79 pmol/l) and a near-normal glycosylated hemoglobin level met the diagnostic criteria for fulminant T1DM. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and insulin were promptly administered, and the patient recovered finally. Conclusions: This rare case indicates that monitoring blood glucose is necessary in SJS/TEN drug reaction, and comprehensive therapy with rehydration, insulin, antibiotics, and IVIG may improve the prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gut microbiota dysbiosis has been linked with numerous autoimmune disorders and inflammatory skin pathologies. The present study is a narrative review aiming to examine dysregulations in the gut microbiota of patients with pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid, exploring how these alterations may contribute to diseases' development and/or progression. Significant alterations in the composition of intestinal micro-biota were identified in patients with pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid: reduction in short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria: Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Lachnospiraceae and Coprococcus spp., which are known for their anti-inflammatory effects, and increased abundance of Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Klebsiella spp., Bacteroides fragilis and Flavonifractor spp., which are recognized for their pro-inflammatory impact. The composition of gut microbiota might influence the pathogenesis of autoimmune bullous diseases. Modified levels of bacteria could become innovative biomarkers for the detection of high-risk individuals, monitoring disease progression and predicting response to treatment. Furthermore, regulating bacterial levels might have therapeutic effects in diminishing inflammation and disease advancement, potentially serving as future therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present case series examined five instances of psoriasiform drug eruption diagnosed between 2014 and 2022 at the study site and 23 cases of drug eruption manifesting psoriasiform lesions which had been reported between 1986 and 2022. The causative drug, distribution of the skin eruptions, clinical latency to eruption, treatment course, and histopathological findings were investigated. The most common causative agents were calcium channel blockers (CCB) (64.5%). Of the 28 cases of psoriasiform drug eruption for which details of the eruption sites were reported, 46.4% occurred on the face, which was slightly higher than the usual distribution of psoriasis. CCB were responsible for 80.0% of the cases of facial skin rash. The mean time from the administration of the suspected drug to eruption onset was 25.0 months (range: 0.5–120 months; median: 13.0 months). In all the cases, the skin rash improved after the causative drug was discontinued. CCB were the most common causative agent, and the eruptions more commonly occurred on the face than in normal psoriasis, suggesting that it is especially important to confirm whether there is a history of CCB administration in psoriasis patients with extensive, facial skin eruptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccines on Myasthenia gravis (MG) during the pandemic. Methods: A total of 141 MG patients between April 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, COVID-19 test results, and vaccine types (mRNA-BNT162b2 and/or inactivated-CoronaVac) were recorded. All patients were followed by face-to-face interviews and/or phone calls. Worsening MG symptoms after COVID-19 infection or vaccines were noted. Results: A total of 60 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test results were COVID-19 positive in 54 (90%) patients. Twenty-eight (46.7%) patients had lung involvement, while 20(33.3%) patients were followed in the ward. Twelve (20%) patients were followed in the intensive care unit, and two of them (3.3%) died. Both deceased patients were unvaccinated. The most common symptoms were fatigue (78.3%), and 13(21.7%) patients were asymptomatic. Of the patients, 96(68%) received at least one dose BNT162b2 or CoronaVac, while 30.4% of the patients received ≥3 doses of vaccines. The local skin irritation and fatigue rate was significantly higher with BNT162b2 vaccine than CoronaVac (p<0.001 and p=0.004, respectively). No serious side effect was observed with either vaccine. Five patients had worsening MG symptoms after vaccination during a six-week follow-up. None of the patients experienced myasthenic crises. Conclusion: Our study results suggest that COVID-19 infection affects MG similar to the general population and does not lead to worsening MG symptoms. Both mRNA and inactivated vaccines with proven efficacy can be used safely in MG patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article describes the case of a 79-year old Caucasian man who was treated with donepezil after developing a pruritic erythematous maculopapular eruption at the application site of rivastigmine transdermal patches, which was used to treat his Lewy body disease. The patient's skin lesions did not regress after antihistaminic treatment with cetirizine. A Naranjo scale assessment showed the high probability of the relation of cutaneous adverse effects with rivastigmine transdermal patches.

Fixed drug eruptions (FDEs) are dermatological manifestations characterized by recurrent lesions at the same site upon re-exposure to the causative drug. We present a novel case of a 32-year-old female who developed bilateral symmetrical erythematous papules on her thighs following the use of chlorzoxazone for chronic back pain. This case is particularly significant as it underscores the potential for this specific drug, which is commonly prescribed, to induce FDE—a reaction previously unreported in the literature. The findings emphasize the necessity for clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion for drug-induced skin reactions, even with medications considered safe and routinely used. This case serves as a critical reminder of the importance of thorough medication history assessments and the potential implications of drug interactions in dermatological care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Apalutamide is a selective androgen receptor signalling inhibitor that is used in the treatment of prostate cancer. Skin rash is one of the most common adverse events with apalutamide. Although the majority of rash events are grade 1 and 2, the appearance of skin rash during treatment can lead to dose reduction, a pause in treatment or even treatment discontinuation, especially if patients present late when the rash has become severe. This in turn can result in a significant delay or even a permanent discontinuation in the patient's treatment of prostate cancer. As apalutamide is a generally well tolerated and an effective treatment for many men with advanced prostate cancer, it is extremely important to make attempts to prevent skin problems or to manage them at the earliest stage possible. We therefore have developed practical guidance for the management of apalutamide-related rash, including an infographic with recommendations for rash management by grade. Central to this approach is patient education and awareness. Encouraging patients to proactively care for their skin from the start of treatment and informing them of the risk of rash with apalutamide therapy are essential. If the patient observes any skin changes, they should be advised to report it straight away to their cancer care team. Adopting this simple, proactive approach of patient education and increased vigilance from the care team is expected to lead to early identification of rash and subsequent intervention to allow for quicker resolution and enable patients to continue their cancer treatment with a drug that can delay disease progression and increase survival in patients with prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are closely associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates, prolonged hospitalization durations, and higher healthcare costs. This study aimed to estimate the incidence, clinical features, and reporting status of ADRs to improve the current ADR reporting system and prevent recurrent ADRs in hospitals. This retrospective study was conducted at a regional referral hospital. Patients diagnosed with ADRs over a 5-year period (2009-2014) were recruited for this study. An ADR was identified as an ADRrelated diagnosis in a patient’s medical record or an ADR registered through the inhospital ADR reporting system. The incidence, culprit drug, clinical manifestations, reporting source, severity, related management, and recurrence rate were assessed. Among 1,112 patients, 1,375 ADR events were collected, an estimated 0.06% of the total number of patient visits. Diagnostic contrast agents (46.4%) were the most common culprit drugs, followed by antibiotics (22.0%), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (9.9%), and opioids (4.5%). Skin reactions (67.5%) such as rashes and hives were the most frequent manifestations. Additional ADR-related medical attention was necessary in two thirds of cases. One hundred eighty ADR events (13.1%) were categorized as severe, and 19 patients (1.4%) experienced re-exposure to the culprit drugs. Four patients (0.3%) experienced fatal ADRs. Physicians were the most frequent ADR reporters in the in-hospital ADR reporting system. In conclusion, many ADR events may be overlooked, and re-exposure to causative drugs commonly occurs. Continuous education and maintenance of a reporting system may be important for preventing recurrent ADRs.

Background. Fixed drug eruption and Rowell syndrome stand as intriguing entities with overlapping clinical and pathological features. Case Presentation. A 32-year-old female patient presented with a tender and pruritic rash on the left upper chest for 3 days. Clinical examination revealed a flaring rash on the chest, under her left eye, tongue, and lips. The patient had a significant past medical history of systemic lupus erythematous with positive (ANA, Sm, dsDNA, ribosomalP, RNP) antibodies, hypocomplementemia, inflammatory arthritis, discoid lupus, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and avascular necrosis affecting both hips and her right knee. At the time of presentation, the patient was on azathioprine 150 mg daily and hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily. Skin biopsy of the left upper chest revealed interface dermatitis with necrotic keratinocytes at the dermal-epidermal junction. Superficial and, in some areas, deep perivascular and peri adnexal lymphocytic infiltrates were observed, accompanied by eosinophils. CD123 staining highlighted 16% of the inflammatory cells. Direct Immunofluorescence for IgG, IgA, IgM, C3, and fibrinogen revealed positive linear basement membrane staining for IgG and fibrinogen, with no significant staining for the remaining immunoreactants. Considering the patient's history of medicine usage, and negative SS-A and SS-B antibody, a fixed drug eruption was favored. Discussion. This article discusses the clinical presentations, pathophysiological mechanisms, and diagnostic criteria for fixed drug eruption and Rowell syndrome. Conclusion. Awareness of the distinct clinical and histopathologic features of fixed drug eruption and Rowell syndrome, particularly when sharing cutaneous manifestations, underscores the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach and laboratory testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Analysing data on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in health facilities is an essential step to help develop effective strategies to reduce their incidence. The objective was to analyse spontaneous ADR reports sent to the Ghanaian Food and Drugs Authority (FDA) by two reporting health facilities over 5 years. Methods: Data from duplicate spontaneous ADR reports sent to the FDA (Ghana) from 2014 to 2018 were extracted. The relationship between independent variables such as age, sex, and source of drugs and ADR outcomes was assessed with either chi‐square or a Cramer's V test for association where appropriate. Results: Type A reactions (65.2%) were the most prevalent of the ADRs, followed by Type B (34.1%), with the majority (80%) of patients affected recovering fully. The majority of Type A reactions (54.1%) occurred in the clinic, while the majority of Type B reactions (43.5%) occurred in the hospital. The skin and central nervous system (CNS) were the most affected (70.8%) organs. A higher incidence of CNS and skin‐related ADRs was recorded in patients older than 30 (RR = 1.28 (1.07–1.53)). Also, females were more likely to experience a CNS‐related ADR. The seriousness of the ADR was found to be significantly associated with the (1) type of prescriber, (2) whether the drug was prescribed, or (3) whether the drug regimen prescribed was appropriate. Even though, in 86% of cases, the offending drug was withdrawn within the first 5 days, it exceeded 20 days in about 6% of cases. The record of allergy status in a patient's folder and the source of the drug were significantly associated with the chance that the offending drug was withdrawn. However, recording ADRs did not influence whether the offending drug was stopped. Conclusion: Most of the ADRs experienced by patients could be avoided if the current systems are improved to prevent the rechallenge of offending drugs. Efforts to improve and update patient medication records and steps to ensure continuity of care are essential in preventing these adverse drug events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common subtype of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Comprehensive analysis of MF cells in situ and ex vivo is complicated by the fact that is challenging to distinguish malignant from reactive T cells with certainty. Methods: To overcome this limitation, we performed combined single-cell RNA (scRNAseq) and T-cell receptor TCR sequencing (scTCRseq) of skin lesions of cutaneous MF lesions from 12 patients. A sufficient quantity of living T cells was obtained from 9 patients, but 2 had to be excluded due to unclear diagnoses (coexisting CLL or revision to a fixed toxic drug eruption). Results: From the remaining patients we established single-cell mRNA expression profiles and the corresponding TCR repertoire of 18,630 T cells. TCR clonality unequivocally identified 13,592 malignant T cells. Reactive T cells of all patients clustered together, while malignant cells of each patient formed a unique cluster expressing genes typical of naive/memory, such as CD27, CCR7 and IL7R, or cytotoxic T cells, e.g., GZMA, NKG7 and GNLY. Genes encoding classic CTCL markers were not detected in all clusters, consistent with the fact that mRNA expression does not correlate linearly with protein expression. Nevertheless, we successfully pinpointed distinctive gene signatures differentiating reactive malignant from malignant T cells: keratins (KRT81, KRT86), galectins (LGALS1, LGALS3) and S100 genes (S100A4, S100A6) being overexpressed in malignant cells. Conclusions: Combined scRNAseq and scTCRseq not only allows unambiguous identification of MF cells, but also revealed marked heterogeneity between and within patients with unexpected functional phenotypes. While the correlation between mRNA and protein abundance was limited with respect to established MF markers, we were able to identify a single-cell gene expression signature that distinguishes malignant from reactive T cells. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is a sudden-onset, severe and rare adverse skin reaction characterized by nonfollicular sterile pustules tending to intertriginous localization. Lesions develop on erythematous and edematous skin. It is often triggered by drugs. This article presents a case diagnosed with AGEP due to etodolac. To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case of AGEP due to etodolac in the literature. A 47-year-old female patient presented with diffuse erythema on the extremities, a purple purpuric rash on the extensor face of both legs, and millimetric pustules on an erythematous base on the inner surface of the left arm. She stated that the reaction developed after taking 3 medications, including etodolac tablets, and gargling the throat with povidone-iodine. The patient was diagnosed with AGEP and her EuroSCAR AGEP Validation Score was calculated as 9 suggesting a definitive diagnosis of AGEP. All of the suspected drugs were discontinued. Methylprednisolone 16 mg/day, a local corticosteroid, and an oral antihistamine were started. Her symptoms resolved and laboratory abnormalities returned to normal within 2 weeks. Patch tests were performed 3 months after the reaction with the suspected drugs. The patch testing showed that only 10% etodolac at 48-, 72- and 96-hour readings were positive (++). The patient was diagnosed with AGEP due to etodolac. AGEP is often secondary reaction to drugs. The most frequent causative drugs are diltiazem, aminopenicillins, pristinamycin, terbinafine, sulphonamides, quinolones, and hydroxychloroquine. AGEP secondary to NSAIDs is very rare. Only one previous case of AGEP due to etodolac was reported in 2011. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Tuberculosis is a communicable illness and one of the leading causes of death, especially in developing countries like Turkey. One of the problems that must be managed well in the treatment of tuberculosis is drug hypersensitivity. The first-line agents are very important for the success of treatment. Alternative drugs are more toxic and less successful in treatment. Therefore, it is very important to be able to include first-line drugs in the post-hypersensitivity regimen. At this point, the success of desensitization comes to the fore. There are fewer studies on rapid drug desensitization in delayed-type drug hypersensitivity to anti-tuberculosis drugs. Aim: The primary aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions in drug-sensitive cases; the secondary aim was to determine the appropriate treatment management. Material and methods: This was a retrospective study. Demographic features, tuberculosis diagnostic indicator, clinical signs of developing a hypersensitivity reaction, reaction time, desensitization scheme and treatment were evaluated. Results: A total of 41 tuberculosis cases were included in the study. Twenty-six of the cases were male; mean age (mean ± SD) 55.44 ±16.93 years; 70.7% of them were diagnosed bacteriologically; 70.7% of them were diagnosed with pulmonary tuberculosis. The most common skin finding was maculopapular drug eruption. The development time (mean ± SD) of the reaction in patients who developed a reaction was 34.93 ±39.62 days. The responsible agent could be identified in 15 reactions. The most common drug responsible for the reaction was rifampicin. Successful desensitization was achieved in 19 (46.3%) cases with the sensitive regimen. The duration of treatment was 8.97 ±3.44 months. When evaluated in terms of treatment results, cure and treatment completion were accepted as treatment success. In this case, 30 (73.2%) patients successfully completed the treatment. Conclusions: Our study is one of the largest series in which delayed-type hypersensitivity develops under tuberculosis treatment and the desensitization scheme is recommended. A practical, easy desensitization scheme had been shared in this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This scoping review aimed to map the adverse reactions in the oral mucosa and face caused by the use of natural products. Methodology: This review was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, with a protocol registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/R57D8). The search was carried out systematically using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, LILACS, and LIVIVO databases, as well as gray literature through Google Scholar and OpenGrey. Reports of clinical cases on the adverse effects of natural products on the oral mucosa or perioral region of the face resulted from inappropriate use or self-medication were included. Data from the included studies were described in a narrative form. Results: Seven hundred and six studies were identified, and after removing duplicates and applying the eligibility criteria, 28 studies were included. The year of publication ranged from 1976 to 2022. The studies were conducted in 19 countries. Fifty patients were mentioned in the included studies and 34 were female (68%). The natural products most related to adverse reactions were propolis (n = 17), with manifestations such as perioral eczema, edema, erosions, erythema, allergic contact dermatitis, and garlic (n = 9), with manifestations such as chemical burn, burning sensation, vesicles and blisters, crusts, and ulcerations. Conclusion: Propolis and garlic were the natural products with the most reported adverse effects on the oral mucosa and perioral region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug‐induced skin disease or cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) are terms that encompass the clinical manifestations of the skin, mucosae and adnexa induced by a drug or its metabolites. The skin is the organ most frequently affected by drug reactions, which may affect up to 10% of hospitalized patients and occur in 1–3% of multimedicated patients. Most CADRs are mild or self‐resolving conditions; however, 2–6.7% of could develop into potentially life‐threatening conditions. CADRs represent a heterogeneous field and can be diagnostically challenging as they may potentially mimic any dermatosis. Currently, there are between 29–35 different cutaneous drug‐reaction patterns reported ranging from mild dermatitis to an extensively burnt patient. The most frequently reported are maculopapular rash, urticaria/angioedema, fixed drug eruption and erythema multiforme. Less common but more severe patterns include erythroderma, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and Stevens–Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis spectrum. Almost any drug can induce a CADR, but antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs and antiepileptics are the most frequently involved. Different mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of CADRs, although in some cases, these remain still unknown. CADRs could be classified in different ways: (i) type A (augmented) or type B (bizarre); (ii) immediate or delayed; (iii) immune‐mediated or nonimmune‐mediated; (iv) nonsevere or life‐threatening; and (v) by their phenotype, including exanthematous, urticarial, pustular and blistering morphology. Recognizing a specific CADR will mostly depend on the ability of the physician to perform a detailed clinical examination, the proper description of the morphology of the skin lesions and supporting laboratory and/or skin biopsy findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a case report of a 50-year-old male who developed a rare skin condition called acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) after undergoing cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) with gadobutrol, a gadolinium-based contrast medium. The patient initially responded well to oral prednisolone treatment, but the rash worsened when the dosage was reduced. The rash was eventually diagnosed as pustular psoriasis or AGEP based on clinical presentation and histopathological findings. Patch testing confirmed a delayed type IV hypersensitivity reaction to gadobutrol. This case highlights the need for increased awareness of AGEP and the potential for adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast media. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) are rare but lifethreatening, with antibiotics being the main cause. This retrospective study from a single center was designed to analyze the culprit drugs, clinical features and treatment outcomes of antibiotic-induced SCARs. Methods: We analyzed cases of antibiotic-induced SCARs in a tertiary hospital in China between January 2013 and January 2024, including Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or Stevens-Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN) overlap, toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP). Descriptive analysis of the demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, treatment and prognosis were carried out. Results: Among 354 cases of SCARs, 63 validated antibiotic-related cases were included. Cephalosporins (31.7%), penicillins (25.4%), and quinolones (19.0%) were the most common triggers for SCARs. Overall, liver (50.8%), lungs (31.7%), and kidneys (23.8%) were the most frequently affected organ in SCARs cases. Eight patients (28.6%) in the SJS/SJS-TEN overlap group and 8 patients (80.0%) in the TEN group received combination therapy of corticosteroids and IVIG. Patients with SCARs caused by penicillins or cephalosporins could receive alternative treatments such as lincomamides, quinolones, and tetracyclines. The mortality rate in the TEN group was the highest at 20.0%, followed by the SJS/SJS-TEN overlap group (7.1%), and no deaths were observed in the DRESS and AGEP groups. Conclusion: The identification of the culprit antibiotics and the application of alternative antibiotic therapies are crucial for the management of antibioticinduced SCARs. If complicated underlying conditions and complications like advanced age, cancer and pneumonia coexist with SCARs, patients might be more at risk for mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Saudi Medical Journal is the property of Saudi Medical Journal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The article discusses a case of misdiagnosis of crusted scabies, a rare and highly contagious variant of scabies. The patient initially received various diagnoses and treatments that worsened the condition. The article emphasizes the importance of proper diagnosis and treatment, including the use of scabicides and washing of clothing and bedding to prevent transmission and reinfection. Crusted scabies is a severe form of scabies that occurs when the skin's immune system is unable to effectively respond to the parasite. Treatment involves a combination of topical cream and oral medication, but there is concern about drug resistance. It is important to reduce environmental transmission and treat close contacts to prevent reinfection. [Extracted from the article]

Simple Summary: Many cancer treatments, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, can cause skin side effects. These are called 'dermatologic toxicities' or 'skin toxicities'. There are many different types of skin toxicities, some of which can not only affect the quality of life but also lead to cancer treatment being stopped or slowed down. This paper gives an overview of 12 of the most common skin toxicities experienced by people receiving cancer treatment. These include rashes, dry skin, skin irritation, hair loss, changes in skin colouring, and itching. We have provided Australia/New Zealand-specific recommendations on how skin toxicities can be prevented and managed, including the role of dermocosmetic solutions. Cancer systemic therapeutics and radiotherapy are often associated with dermatological toxicities that may reduce patients' quality of life and impact their course of cancer treatment. These toxicities cover a wide range of conditions that can be complex to manage with increasing severity. This review provides details on twelve common dermatological toxicities encountered during cancer treatment and offers measures for their prevention and management, particularly in the Australian/New Zealand context where skincare requirements may differ to other regions due to higher cumulative sun damage caused by high ambient ultraviolet (UV) light exposure. Given the frequency of these dermatological toxicities, a proactive phase is envisaged where patients can actively try to prevent skin toxicities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses intertriginous skin disorders, which are common in general practice and can range from benign conditions to chronic diseases. These disorders occur in areas where opposing skin surfaces come into contact, such as the groin folds, axillae, and natal cleft. The article emphasizes the importance of a thorough history and physical examination in diagnosing these disorders and provides a list of common intertriginous skin disorders and their first-line management options. It suggests that referral to a dermatologist may be necessary in certain cases. Overall, the article concludes that most intertriginous skin disorders can be successfully managed in primary care. [Extracted from the article]

Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis (AGEP) is a rare skin condition that is typically triggered by drug reactions, particularly antibiotics, but can also arise from infections or vaccinations. Its primary symptom is the sudden appearance of sterile pustules with erythematous, accompanied by systemic symptoms such as fever. Unless complicated by secondary infection, AGEP usually resolves spontaneously and has a favorable prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allergic contact dermatitis secondary to textile allergens is not uncommon given continuous exposure to these allergens. Common textile allergens include rubber additives, textile dyes and formaldehyde. Rubber materials are used in various garments such as dresses, underwear and stretchy athletic wear. Allergic contact dermatitis commonly presents with eczematous eruption but it can present in other forms such as lichenoid eruption. In this case report, we present a 53-year-old male with lichenoid allergic contact dermatitis due to textile rubber allergen previously misdiagnosed as fixed drug eruption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Fixed drug eruption is a common dermatological skin problem with acute and chronic consequences and with different clinical manifestations. The offending drugs are numerous but it is often difficult to specify them in many cases. The purpose of the study is to collect a large series of patients to clarify the difference between new and old clinical manifestations and to pinpoint the offending drugs. Methods This is a case series descriptive study where all patients with certain diagnoses of fixed drug eruption that were seen during the period from January 2014 to June 2023 were collected and analyzed regarding the demographic and clinical features. In addition, a full clinical examination was carried out including the acute, recurrent and chronic sequelae. The tracing for the insulting drugs was tried in the new and old cases. Results The analysis of 68 cases revealed that their ages ranged from 10-55 years, with males to female's ratio of 2:1. The disease was acute in (88.2%) patients, and characterized by dusky red patches, or bright red. Also, some lesions were dusky red bullous. Frequently associated with itching and burning. The chronic cases showed well circumscribed patches and macules with deep dermal melanosis. The common sites of lesions were penile in 33.82%, trunk in 17.64%, lips in 14.7%, hands in 11.76%, face in 7.35% of cases. The offending drugs were only detected in 5 (7.35%) participants. Conclusion Fixed drug eruption is a common cutaneous medical problem with diverse clinical manifestations and on healing, leaves permanent or long-lasting dermal pigmentation. Tracing for the offending drug is very difficult. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects approximately 2-2.5% of the global population. In Egypt, the prevalence was reported at 7% in 2015. Over recent years, new direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies have been developed. One of the most widely used regimens in Egypt for treating HCV infection is a combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir. However, there is still a limited understanding of the potential dermatological side effects associated with these medications. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and clinical manifestations of cutaneous adverse reactions in patients undergoing treatment with direct-acting antiviral drugs. Patients and methods: This research involved 140 HCV-positive patients who were monitored for 12 weeks during their treatment. Of these, 105 patients were treated with a combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir (protocol 1), while 35 patients received the same regimen along with ribavirin (protocol 2). Dermatological evaluations were conducted at the start of treatment and weekly during follow-up visits to identify any skin-related side effects. Results: Dermatological adverse reactions were observed in 48 patients (34%), with 38 patients (36%) in protocol 1 and 10 patients (28%) in protocol 2. The skin-related issues noted during treatment included itching, mild generalized drug eruptions, hyperpigmentation, dry mouth, acne flare-ups, telogen effluvium, and ecchymosis. Conclusion: Directly acting antiviral therapy might yield some dermatological adverse effects. Most of them are reversible and don't require stopping of the treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Icodextrin has been widely prescribed for peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with inadequate ultrafiltration, but icodextrin induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) has been not well recognized in clinical practice. We described a young‐aged female with IgA nephropathy and end stage kidney disease under continuous automated peritoneal dialysis. She developed skin erythema with exfoliation over the groin 7th day after initiation of icodextrin based PD dialysate. Initially, her scaling skin lesion with pinhead‐sized pustules affected the bilateral inguinal folds, and then it extended to general trunk accompanied by pruritus. She was admitted because of deterioration of skin lesion on 14th day of icodextrin exposure. She was afebrile and physical examination was notable for widespread erythematous papules with pruritus extending over her groins and trunk. Pertinent laboratory examination showed leukocytosis of 18 970 cells/μL with neutrophile count of 17 642 cells/μL (92.3%), and c‐reactive‐protein: 3.39 mg/dL. Skin biopsy revealed multifocal sub corneal abscess with papillary dermal edema, and upper‐dermal neutrophilia with perivascular accentuation, consistent with the diagnosis of AGEP. After discontinuation of PD, she underwent temporary high‐flux haemodialysis with treatment of steroid and antihistamine. Her dermatologic lesion resolved without any skin sequalae completely within 4 days, and she underwent icodextrin‐free peritoneal dialysis at 17th day. This case highlighted the fact that icodextrin‐induced AGEP should be early recognized to avoid inappropriate management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background - Skin being largest organ in body is frequently affected by drug reactions accounting for 2% in OPD, 10% in IPD admissions and 2-7% have serious, fatal consequences. Thus spontaneous reporting is very essential . objectives - 1.To analyze the clinical characteristics and to identify the Culprit drugs,responsible for CADRs, 2.Assess the severity, know the outcome of CADRs 3. Associate the degree of severity with different risk factors.. Methods - It was a prospective observational study was done both in the OPD and IPD of Skin and VD department of MKCG hospital, Berhampur, Odisha from September 2022 to March 2023. 82 cases of CADR of either sex of any age were included in this study. Data were collected in suspected ADRs reporting form version 1.3, PvPI .The Causality,severity assessment was done by valid scale and data were analyzed by descriptive statistics in numbers and percentages . The severe form of CADRs associated with risk factors were analyzed by Chi--square test. P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results - CADRs had female preponderance 58.5%) and the most commonly affected age group was the elderly population ( 42.6 %) in this study. Fixed drug eruption (FDE) was most common (29.2%) type and the commonly involved culprit drugs suspected were anti-microbials (52.4%). Major CADRs belonged to probable (54%) category in Causality assessment and were of Mild (40.2 %) variety in Severity assessment. The risk factors found to be significantly associated were extreme age (> 60 years), H/O previous skin allergy, multi-medications (>2 drugs) with p=0.019*, p=0.001+, p= 0.02* respectively. Conclusions - FDE are identified as major type of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Major Group of drugs responsible for this were found to be Antimicrobials. The severe CADRs were mostly associated with extreme age, previous allergic history and multi -medications which should be taken with caution to avoid CADRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A generalized fixed drug eruption (FDE) is an uncommon but potentially dangerous reaction to medication. In this case series, we present 1 patient with a generalized FDE and 2 patients with generalized bullous FDE that resolved with cyclosporine, though 1 patient required close monitoring in the intensive care unit. Immediate acceleration of care upon development and recognition of generalized bullous FDE is essential, as the mortality rate is similar to Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses a case of progressive eyelash loss and scale on the right eyelid in an 88-year-old man. The diagnosis was folliculotropic mycosis fungoides (FMF), a variant of mycosis fungoides (MF) characterized by folliculotropism and follicular-based lesions. FMF can present with various clinical manifestations, including patches, plaques, tumors, acneform lesions, and areas of alopecia. The article also mentions other differential diagnoses such as alopecia mucinosa, seborrheic dermatitis, and alopecia areata. The document provides information on different types of hair loss conditions, including patchy alopecia and psoriatic alopecia, and discusses their histopathologic features and immunohistochemistry findings. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: The skin and mucous membrane of cancer patients can be directly or indirectly impaired during the treatment of cancers, bringing about not physical but also psychological damages to cancer patients. A practical guideline is of great significance to improve the quality of life for patients suffered from cutaneous adverse events. Methods: This guideline was generated based on up-to-date evidence and the consensus of experts specialized in dermatology. Results: The current guideline include the baseline screening of skin and mucosal membranes, the manifestations of injuries on skin, mucosa and appendages, along with the treatment of them. The causal anti-tumor management include chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immune therapy and surgery. Conclusion: This guideline can be helpful to reduce the risk of cutaneous adverse events during anti-cancer treatment and improve the quality of life of patients suffered from these adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous pseudolymphomas are a wide group of diseases mimicking cutaneous lymphoma. They comprise several skin conditions with different etiopathogenesis, clinical–pathological features, and prognosis, which may occur in the absence of an identifiable trigger factor or after administration of medications or vaccinations, tattoos, infections, or arthropod bites. They present with different manifestations: from solitary to regionally clustered lesions, up to generalized distribution and, in rare cases, erythroderma. They persist variably, from weeks to years, and resolve spontaneously or after antibiotics, but may recur in some cases. CD30+ T‐cell pseudolymphomas are characterized by the presence of large, activated lymphoid cells, generally in response to viral infections, arthropod assault reactions, and drug eruptions. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a ubiquitous Gram‐negative bacillus responsible for opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients. Infection of intact skin in immunocompetent patients is particularly rare. Here, we report a case of a man presenting an isolated nodule histopathologically mimicking a primary cutaneous CD30+ T‐cell lymphoproliferative disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Ribociclib is approved for hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treatment, in combination with endocrine therapy. Hematological, hepatic, and cardiac adverse events (AEs) emerged from pivotal trials, but little is known about cutaneous adverse events (CAEs). Patients and Methods We report data from a retrospective cohort study of all patients with HR+/HER2− ABC treated with ribociclib at Humanitas Cancer Center between June 2017 and December 2022. We recorded clinical-pathological data, the incidence, and treatment of ribociclib-related CAEs. These were evaluated according to the NCI-CTCAE v5.0 classification. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used to analyze differences between groups. Results Thirteen of 91 patients (14.3%) experienced treatment-related CAEs (mean time to the occurrence: 3.9 months). The most frequent CAEs were eczematous dermatitis (53.8%) and maculo-papular reaction (15.4%). Itch was reported by all 13 patients. The grade was G3 in 8 cases, G2 in 4, and G1 in 1. An integrated approach based on ribociclib dose modulation and dermatological interventions (oral antihistamine, moisturized cream, topical, and/or systemic steroids) could prevent ribociclib discontinuation in most patients. At a median follow-up of 20 months, the median PFS was 13 months (range, 1-66) with a better PFS curves for patients experiencing CAEs (P  = .04). Conclusion We mapped frequency and types of ribociclib-induced CAEs. An interdisciplinary management of CAEs incorporated into routine care may reduce the rate of drug discontinuation thus potentially contributing to better long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses cutaneous reactions that occur during Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. The study examined 40 patients who experienced 44 cutaneous reactions during treatment. The most common reactions were urticaria, angioedema, and maculopapular exanthema. The study found that most reactions were not mediated by allergic mechanisms, suggesting alternative causes such as immune responses triggered by H. pylori eradication. The article emphasizes the importance of considering non-allergic causes for accurate diagnosis and management of cutaneous reactions during H. pylori treatment. [Extracted from the article]

The article discusses IL36RN mutations in Chinese patients with acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), a severe skin disease characterized by sterile pustules on an erythematous background. IL36RN mutations have been linked to AGEP development, with a specific mutation, c.115+6T>C, identified in Chinese patients. The study suggests that IL36RN mutations exacerbate IL36 signaling, leading to immune cell recruitment and pustule formation in AGEP, but not all AGEP patients carry IL36RN mutations, indicating other potential causes. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore other factors contributing to AGEP. [Extracted from the article]

To avoid inhalational anesthetics, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is required in patients with a predisposition to malignant hyperthermia (MH). However, propofol, which is frequently used, may be avoided in patients with egg allergies because of the contraindications in the drug information. Furthermore, some patients may not consent to the use of propofol. We report a case of TIVA using midazolam and dexmedetomidine as substitutes for propofol in a pediatric patient with egg allergy and a predisposition to MH. A 10‑year‑old boy was scheduled to undergo perforated drainage of an epidural abscess. He had egg allergy, and his uncle had been diagnosed with MH. He also developed a generalized drug eruption caused by antibiotics. Concerned about allergic reactions, he and his parents did not consent to administrating propofol. The patient’s perioperative course was uneventful. The combination of midazolam and dexmedetomidine may be a useful option as substitutes for propofol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article reports a case of erythema dyschromicum perstans (EDP) in a 38-year-old male following influenza vaccination. The patient developed eruptions around the vaccination site, which later spread to the entire body. EDP is a rare skin condition characterized by uniform dark brown-grey pigmentation. The article discusses the difficulty in managing EDP and mentions that isotretinoin has shown promise as a treatment option. This is the first reported case of EDP triggered by the influenza vaccine, and the diagnosis was confirmed through clinical presentation and histopathology. [Extracted from the article]

This article is a case report of a 53-year-old woman who developed acute generalised exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) after receiving betamethasone sodium phosphate treatment for COVID-19. The woman had a history of contact dermatitis and AGEP caused by other steroids in the past. Patch tests confirmed her allergy to certain groups of corticosteroids. Her skin rash improved with topical treatment. The article highlights the rare occurrence of AGEP induced by systemic steroids and emphasizes the importance of conducting various tests for accurate diagnosis. [Extracted from the article]

An identical group of disorders has been called "interstitial granulomatous dermatitis" and "palisaded neutrophilic and granulomatous dermatitis." In addition, a drug-induced subset of this condition has been named "interstitial granulomatous drug reaction (IGDR)." More recently, "reactive granulomatous dermatitis (RGD)" has been proposed as an umbrella term encompassing these three disorders. A considerable number of RGD cases are associated with systemic conditions, including autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, and malignancies. IGDR has also been shown to be caused by certain medications. We present a case of a 74-year-old Japanese man showing an asymptomatic, well-demarcated erythema eruption on the bilateral inguinal region extending to the lower abdomen and proximal thigh area. He had hyperlipidemia and had been taking pravastatin for 4 years. A biopsy specimen taken from the erythematous lesion revealed infiltration of lymphocytes and histiocytes in the upper and lower dermis. Interstitial infiltrates of histiocytes and lymphocytes were found as they were dispersed between collagen bundles. Immunostaining showed CD68+ macrophages intermingled with CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Based on the clinical and histologic findings, the eruption was diagnosed as RGD. Because of the possibility of IGDR, pravastatin was stopped. His eruption completely disappeared within 6 months after the discontinuation. The list of drugs that cause RGD includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, antihistamines, ß-blockers, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, tocilizumab and ustekinumab. In addition, various statins have been reported to induce drug eruptions. The eruption types are mainly eczematous or lichenoid reactions, with psoriasiform or ichthyosiform reactions occurring rarely. There was only one report documenting that RGD occurred in patients administered rosuvastatin, with annular, violaceous plaques distributed on the extremities, proximal trunk and intertriginous areas. Pravastatin induces lichenoid eruption, but RGD has not been documented. Our case suggests that RGD is underestimated as an adverse effect of statins possibly because of its unusual cutaneous manifestations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]