Search

Objective To assess the real-world effectiveness of targeting biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients negative for rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Methods We retrospectively selected 81 seronegative and 404 seropositive RA patients receiving treatment with abatacept, anti-TNF alpha or tocilizumab. Effectiveness was evaluated by analysing drug survival using Kaplan–Meyer analysis over 10-year follow-up. Survival rates were compared by log rank test, and hazard ratios (HRs) of therapy discontinuation were estimated through multivariate Cox regression. Results Clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups, except for a significantly higher percentage of inadequate responders to prior bDMARDs in the seronegative RA patients (P  = 0.02). Among seronegative RA, tocilizumab demonstrated a survival rate of 73.9% with a mean survival time (MST) of 76.8 months (95% CI 61–92), which was significantly higher than abatacept [37.5%, MST 37.1 months (95% CI 22–51; P  = 0.01)]. Anti-TNF alpha therapy fell in the middle [50.0%, MST 63.5 months (95% CI 47–79)] but the difference was not significant. Nevertheless, seropositive RA patients did not show significantly different drug survival rates. Negative predictors of drug discontinuation were RF/ACPA positivity (HR 0.56) and sex male (HR 0.58), but treatment with abatacept (HR 1.88) or anti-TNF alpha (HR 1.79), no co-therapy with conventional DMARDs (HR 1.74), absence of bone erosions (HR 1.41) and higher HAQ (HR 1.58) were positive predictors. Conclusions To confirm these preliminary findings and to explore the hypothesis of a distinctive therapeutic algorithm in seronegative RA, prospective studies on larger cohorts are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of biologics has greatly improved patient outcomes, yet some patients are compelled to switch therapies. Predicting these therapeutic failures is important; however, the factors associated with switching biologics have not been fully explored. This study examined patterns and determinants of biologics switching in psoriasis treatment retrospectively over 13 years. We focused on the association between clinical characteristics, basal laboratory data, and frequency of biologics switching. The findings revealed that elevated Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores and the presence of arthritis were observed in patients who experienced two or more treatment switches compared with those without treatment switches. Moreover, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was associated with higher biologics switching rates, indicating that systemic inflammation significantly impacts treatment adherence. A treatment approach, taking into account both the clinical presentation and inflammatory biomarkers, may be important for optimizing patient management in psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The advent of novel biologics has led to an increase in biologic‐switching as patients and clinicians pursue improved clinical outcomes. However, guidance on treatment sequencing in an Australian setting is sparse. This study examines the patterns of care across two tertiary centres in Australia and characterizes the factors contributing to biologic‐switching. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who attended the outpatient Dermatology biologic clinics across two tertiary hospitals was conducted. Data on treatment sequencing and patients' PASI at every visit from April 2006 to December 2020 were collected. Patterns of biologic‐switching were examined. The speed of treatment response for each biologic was determined by the time to achieve PASI‐90 and ‐100 for each treatment course. Results: A total of 440 treatment courses were analysed. Ustekinumab and adalimumab were the most frequently prescribed first‐line biologics. The highest proportion of biologic‐switching was observed among patients on TNF‐α inhibitors (63.8%). After 2015, more patients were prescribed IL‐12/23 and IL‐17 inhibitors in favour of TNF‐α inhibitors. IL‐17 inhibitors demonstrated the most rapid treatment response and low PASI scores relative to other biologics. Patients who did not switch biologics had lower rates of psoriatic arthritis and lower BMI, compared to patients who switched biologics. The median PASI on discontinuation generally exceeded 3.0, while on continuation, it was less than 1.2, reflecting patients' and clinicians' thresholds for biologic‐switching. Conclusions: This study demonstrates an increased uptake of more novel biologics as they become available, due to improved safety profiles and clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Biological treatment has been a game changer in the management of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. In Denmark, biological treatment for psoriasis is registered in two data sources. We aimed to describe the utilization of biologics for psoriasis in Denmark using data from both data sources separately. Methods: We used data from two different nationwide Danish data sources: The healthcare registries and the clinical quality database, Dermbio. Utilization patterns were described by three different parameters: (1) distribution of drugs used in the first treatment episodes, (2) treatment cascade on a population level, and (3) drug survival using Kaplan Meier (KM) analysis and the proportion of patients covered (PPC) method. Results: From January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2018, we found 1878 users of biologics in the healthcare registries and 2264 in Dermbio. Adalimumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab were the most common first‐choice treatments throughout the study period. According to the healthcare registries, it was most common to have more than one treatment episode with the same drug. In Dermbio, most were registered to have only one observable treatment episode overall in the study period. Ustekinumab showed the longest drug survival in both databases. Drug survival was longer for all biologics in Dermbio than in the healthcare registries. Conclusion: Adalimumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab were the most common first‐choice treatments in Denmark. Overall, ustekinumab showed the longest drug survival. We observed important differences in treatment cascades and drug survival between Dermbio and the healthcare registries, which should be considered when using these data sources to perform drug utilization studies on biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Objective Methods Results Conclusion Long‐term data on the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab for chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) in large populations are lacking.To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, estimated omalizumab treatment duration and its predictors, as well as differences between CIndU subtypes, in a large long‐term CIndU cohort.A multinational multicenter study was conducted at 14 specialized urticaria centres (UCAREs), including all CIndU patients ever treated with omalizumab from 2009 until July 2022. Kaplan–Meier survival and regression analyses were performed.Across 234 CIndU patients (55% female; mean age 37 years), 76% (n = 178) had standalone CIndU and 24% (n = 56) had predominant CIndU plus minor CSU, with an observation period up to 13 years. Most CIndU patients (73%, n = 145/200 with available data on response) had complete/good response to omalizumab treatment, without significant differences between CIndU subtypes. Sixty‐two (26%) patients discontinued omalizumab; due to well‐controlled disease (47%, n = 29), ineffectiveness (34%, n = 21), side effects (3%, n = 2), combination of ineffectiveness and side effects (3%, n = 2) and other reasons (13%, n = 8). The median estimated omalizumab treatment duration exceeded 5 years (54% drug survival at 5 years) and was mostly determined by well‐controlled disease. Higher age predicted a lower chance to discontinue omalizumab due to well‐controlled disease (HR 0.969, 95%CI 0.945–0.995). CIndU subtype and presence of minor CSU were not related to response and time until omalizumab discontinuation for any reason.Omalizumab is highly effective and safe in CIndU patients, with long estimated treatment duration mainly reflecting long disease duration. Our data show omalizumab's high potential as treatment in any subtype of CIndU and support its clinical use for these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this observational, multicenter study was to assess the real-world use of brodalumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in patients in the Czech Republic, using data from the BIOREP registry. Methods: The study included 273 patients aged ≥ 18 years with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who received brodalumab. Endpoints were drug survival (time from treatment initiation to discontinuation), effectiveness [Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)], and health-related quality-of-life [Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)]. Results: Predicted drug survival probability was 92.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.1, 95.7%] at 6 months and 84.2% (95% CI 79.5, 89.1%) at 12 months; this was maintained at 24 months [80.4% (95% CI 74.5, 86.8%)]. Younger age, higher body mass index, and no previous biologic treatment were significantly associated with longer drug survival. Absolute PASI ≤ 3 after 3 months was achieved by 89.8% of patients; 92.4%, 77.8%, and 59.1% reached PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100, respectively. After 12 months, 96.5% of 141 patients had an absolute PASI ≤ 3. The proportion of patients achieving DLQI 0/1 was 87.3% at 12 months. Conclusion: This study demonstrated high and sustained drug survival with high rates of skin clearance and improved quality of life in patients with relatively severe disease treated with brodalumab. Improvements were observed as early as 3 months post-treatment initiation and were sustained for up to 24 months in a real-life setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction Several clinical trials have established the efficacy and safety of dupilumab for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). However, literature remains scarce in reporting the long-term effectiveness, safety, and drug survival of dupilumab in real-world settings. This study aimed to describe the latter outcomes of dupilumab in patients with AD. Methods This Portuguese, multicentric, observational, retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with AD who initiated dupilumab between January 2019 and September 2023, with a follow-up period up to 30 months. Drug discontinuation and adverse effects data were used to estimate drug survival. Clinical assessments included the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results A total of 312 patients were included in the study, with 56.4% being male (median age of 30 years, range 18–83). The 30-month drug survival rate was 82.0%. During the study period, 12.5% of the sample (n = 39 patients) discontinued treatment: 7.3% due to treatment failure, 2.9% due to safety concerns, 1.3% due to complete disease control, 0.6% due to pregnancy, and 0.3% due to lack of compliance. Adverse events not leading to drug discontinuation were noted in 25.6% of the sample (n = 80). Conjunctivitis was the most frequently reported adverse event (17%), followed by facial erythema (9%). At 30 months, the mean EASI decreased significantly from 27.30 ± 11.89 at baseline to 2.92 ± 3.96 (p

Background: Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is an effective treatment for patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) resistant to antihistamines, but about 10% are unresponsive. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness, safety, and drug survival (DS) of omalizumab by considering clinical and laboratory characteristics. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 296 patients with severe CSU treated with omalizumab. Disease activity, comorbidities, and serum levels of total IgE and anti-thyroid autoantibodies were evaluated over a period of up to 8 years. DS was analyzed using unadjusted Kaplan–Meier survival curves. When applicable, the risk of discontinuation was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Results: Out of 296 patients, 118 (40.4%) were early responders, 72 (25.0%) were late responders, 76 (26.0%) were partial responders, and 25 (8.6%) were non-responders. Early responders were more likely to be patients without associated inducible urticaria (p = 0.021, χ2 = 9.692), without autoimmune thyroiditis (p = 0.007, χ2 = 12.037), and those with higher IgE levels (p = 0.039, χ2 = 8.385). Overall, DS was 53.5% at 8 years, primarily due to clinical remission. DS due to inefficacy and clinical remission were 83.9% and 62.1%, respectively, at 8 years. No patients discontinued omalizumab due to adverse events. Patients with normal IgE levels (p = 0.012, HR = 4.639, CI: 1.393–15.445) and those with autoimmune thyroiditis (p = 0.028, HR = 3.316, CI: 1.128–8.718) had a higher risk of discontinuing omalizumab due to inefficacy. Conclusions: This study confirms the long-term effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in the treatment of CSU over a period of up to 8 years. Most patients discontinued omalizumab due to clinical remission, while only 5.1% discontinued it due to ineffectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication has proven effective for treating ADHD in adults, nonetheless previous studies have shown high rates of medication discontinuation. Objective: To assess drug survival and identify risk factors associated with discontinuation of ADHD medication. Methods: A nationwide registry‐based cohort study in Danish adults who redeemed a prescription for ADHD medication for the first time between 2010 and 2015. All patients were followed for 5 years from the first redeemed prescription. Discontinuation was defined as a gap of 12 months between redemptions. Logistic regression analysis with odds ratio (OR) and Kaplan Meier analysis were used to examine risk factors (sex, age, socioeconomic status, substance use disorders, and comorbidities) associated with discontinuation. Results: Twenty three thousand nine‐hundred and sixteen patients with ADHD were identified. The 5‐year overall drug survival was 29% in women vs. 23.5% in men. The risk of medication discontinuation was significantly higher in men compared to women, OR 1.26 (95% CI 1.19–1.34, p < 0.001). Adults aged 31–50 years had a significantly decreased risk of medication discontinuation compared to adults aged 18–30 years, OR 0.57 (95% CI 0.53–0.61, p < 0.001). Switching ADHD medication two times or three times or more significantly decreased the risk of discontinuation; OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.49–0.56, p < 0.001) and OR 0.26 (95% CI 0.23–0.30, p < 0.001), respectively. Substance use disorders and certain comorbidities were associated with medication discontinuation. Eating disorders, OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.64–0.78, p < 0.001), intellectual disabilities, OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.59–0.73, p < 0.001) and sleep disorders, OR 0.42 (95% CI 0.37–0.49, p < 0.001) were associated with continuation of ADHD medication. Conclusions: The 5‐year overall drug survival was longer in women compared to men. Women with ADHD; adults aged 31–50; and patients with comorbid eating disorder; intellectual disability; sleep disorder and medication switching were individually associated with continuation of ADHD medication. Various factors were associated with medication discontinuation. Discontinuation should be acknowledged as a common phenomenon in patients with ADHD and calls for increased attention from the treatment responsible prescriber or team. Moreover, our findings suggest that timely, frequent medication switching, or temporary regimens may indeed represent optimal management strategies for a significant proportion of the ADHD population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Summary: Background: Alcohol abuse is correlated with the onset and worsening of psoriasis, but its effects, as for smoking, on biological therapies are still poorly investigated. Materials and methods: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of alcohol abuse and other discretionary habits (such as smoking and sedentary lifestyle) in patients with psoriasis treated with topicals, conventional systemic and biologic therapies. The second objective is to investigate the impact of discretionary habits, focusing on alcohol abuse, on the response to biological therapy. To identify alcohol dependence, the CAGE questionnaire was distributed among patients of our clinic. Results: 305 patients were included with 18% at high risk of alcohol abuse. Clinically, guttate psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were more common in patients at higher risk of alcohol abuse. Furthermore, patients with an alcohol problem who started biological therapy reported a higher PASI than those who drank less. None of the considered variables seemed to correlate with discontinuation of medication or with lower achievement of the analyzed outcomes (PASI100, PASI90, and PASI≤3). There was a stronger association between alcohol dependence and patients receiving conventional therapy than with patients receiving biologics. Conclusions: The efficacy of biologicals did not seem to be impacted by alcohol consumption, smoking, or sedentary lifestyle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the real-world drug survival, adherence, and discontinuation risk of biologics disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods: This was a retrospective study using a computerized database. Biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced AS patients who initiated treatment with bDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors {TNF-αis} or interleukin-17 inhibitor {IL-17i}) during 2015–2018 were included. Adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) method. Drug survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates. Risk of discontinuation was estimated by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results: We identified 343 eligible patients utilizing 481 lines of therapy. The mean age was 44.6 years (SD ± 13.4), 57.7% were males, and 69.7% were biologic-naïve at baseline. The proportion of highly adherent patients (PDC ≥ 0.8) in the biologic-naïve group was 63.5% for golimumab, 69.2% for etanercept, and 71.6% for adalimumab (p > 0.9). Among the biologic-experienced group, secukinumab had the highest proportion of adherent patients (75.7%) and etanercept the lowest (50.0%) reaching statistical difference (p < 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier analysis did not show a significant difference in drug survival in either the biologic-naïve or the biologic-experienced groups (p = 0.85). Multivariable analysis demonstrated a similar risk for discontinuation for etanercept, golimumab, and secukinumab compared with adalimumab, regardless of biologic-experience status. Conclusions: Adherence, drug survival, and risk for discontinuation were similar for all TNF-αis and the IL-17i SEC, regardless of biologic-experience status. As drug survival is an indirect measure of drug efficacy, n, in real-world settings, we believe caregivers can integrate these results into treatment considerations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory condition, often presents challenges in treatment, particularly in areas such as nails, palms/soles, scalp/face, and genitalia. Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) like risankizumab targeting interleukin-23 (IL-23) have emerged as promising treatments, yet data on long-term efficacy remain limited. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to evaluate the drug survival at 12 and 36 months of 191 psoriasis patients treated with risankizumab, focusing on critical areas. Patients, previously unresponsive to first-line therapies, were treated according to Italian Guidelines. Survival analysis revealed a 97.6% one-year and 95% three-year drug survival rate. Secondary ineffectiveness was the primary reason for discontinuation, particularly in palmoplantar involvement cases. Factors such as BMI, gender, age, disease duration, baseline severity, and previous biologic exposure did not significantly impact drug survival, except for palmoplantar psoriasis (HR 4.72). Risankizumab demonstrated prolonged response with low treatment switch requirements, especially notable in challenging areas. Understanding such factors can aid in optimizing therapeutic approaches for improved patient care and long-term outcomes in managing psoriasis. Further research is warranted to refine treatment strategies in difficult-to-treat areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Several clinical trials have established the efficacy and safety of dupilumab for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). However, literature remains scarce in reporting the long-term effectiveness, safety, and drug survival of dupilumab in real-world settings. This study aimed to describe the latter outcomes of dupilumab in patients with AD. Methods: This Portuguese, multicentric, observational, retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with AD who initiated dupilumab between January 2019 and September 2023, with a follow-up period up to 30 months. Drug discontinuation and adverse effects data were used to estimate drug survival. Clinical assessments included the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results: A total of 312 patients were included in the study, with 56.4% being male (median age of 30 years, range 18–83). The 30-month drug survival rate was 82.0%. During the study period, 12.5% of the sample (n = 39 patients) discontinued treatment: 7.3% due to treatment failure, 2.9% due to safety concerns, 1.3% due to complete disease control, 0.6% due to pregnancy, and 0.3% due to lack of compliance. Adverse events not leading to drug discontinuation were noted in 25.6% of the sample (n = 80). Conjunctivitis was the most frequently reported adverse event (17%), followed by facial erythema (9%). At 30 months, the mean EASI decreased significantly from 27.30 ± 11.89 at baseline to 2.92 ± 3.96 (p < 0.001), reflecting an overall improvement of 89.3%. Similarly, pruritus NRS decreased from 7.36 ± 1.90 at baseline to 1.74 ± 2.16 at month 30 (p < 0.001), improving by 76.4%, and mean DLQI changed from 18.0 ± 7.09 at baseline to 2.67 ± 3.95 at month 30 (p < 0.001), decreasing by 85.2%. Conclusions: This study increases our current understanding of dupilumab in real-world settings, demonstrating its long-term effectiveness and safety in treating AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real‐world data on the long‐term effectiveness of the anti‐IL17 agent secukinumab in treating moderate‐to‐severe Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) are lacking. In this study, 24 patients with moderate–severe HS received five weekly subcutaneous injections followed by maintenance doses every 4 weeks. Primary outcomes included HiSCR, IHS4 reduction, and DLQI measures assessed at 12‐week intervals. The median secukinumab drug survival was 16.0 months (range 3–51), with a 56.5% maximal response rate at 6 months and dropout exceeding 40% at 1 year. Baseline disease burden emerged as a key predictor of treatment response, overshadowing factors like sex or BMI. Prior systemic steroid use negatively impacts drug survival. The study underscores the critical 6‐month window for assessing treatment efficacy, emphasizing the importance of initial induction dosing. Additionally, the newly developed scoring system, IHS4‐55, showed analogies to the older HiSCR score in capturing treatment response. In this real‐life scenario, challenges persist in HS management, necessitating innovative therapeutic approaches and predictive markers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Information on the persistence of tofacitinib (TOF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is scarce in real-world conditions. Our objective was to analyze the persistence and safety of TOF under these conditions. Methods. This was a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study of all patients with PsA who received at least 1 dose of TOF. The main focus was on adverse events (AEs) and drug survival. Drug survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and persistence explanatory factors by multivariate Cox regression models. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to measure association. Results. Seventy-two patients were included, 54 women and 18 men, mean age 51.9 (SD 11.1) years, mean disease duration of 10.4 (SD 6.99) years. TOF was > third line of therapy in > 70% of cases. The median survival was 13.0 (IQR 5.3-29.0) months. One-year retention rate was 52.7% (95% CI 42.4-65.6). TOF survival was not influenced by sex, disease duration, comorbidities, or line of treatment. Younger patients (HR 0.96, P = 0.01) and those with enthesitis (HR 0.37, P = 0.03) showed lower odds of drug discontinuation. The overall rate ofAEs was 52.9 (95% CI 38.5-70.6)/100 person-years. Most AEs occurred during the first 6 months of exposure. Conclusion. In this real-world study, TOF showed a reasonably good retention rate in a PsA population that was mostly refractory to biologic and oral targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. There were no new causes for concern regarding safety. Patients with refractory PsA and enthesitis might be a specific target population for this drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background SB5 (adalimumab-bwwd) is an adalimumab biosimilar targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases, including moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.Objectives To assess the four-year persistence associated with the effectiveness and safety of SB5 in patients with psoriasis in the UK and Ireland.Methods This prospective study included 1195 SB5-treated patients using British Association of Dermatologists’ Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) between 01 June 2018 and 31 August 2022. Persistence was defined as the time from biologic therapy initiation to discontinuation and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate SB5 discontinuation rates. Cox regression was used to investigate the effect of covariates on the time-to-first-discontinuation of SB5 with the potential covariates.Results SB5 one-, two-, three-, and four-year discontinuation rates were 26.5%, 37.2%, 41.9%, and 43.3%, respectively. Tested covariates such as switching, age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and duration of psoriasis did not significantly affect the discontinuation rate of SB5.Conclusions Median persistence of SB5 in predominantly bio-naïve psoriasis patients was about 2.5 years in clinical practice. The results suggest that SB5 can be confidently used for patients with psoriasis, offering comparable outcomes to reference adalimumab.

Abstract Background To assess the drug survival and change of disease activity using a second Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) after failure to a JAKi and subsequent biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods This retrospective cohort study included 32 patients with difficult-to-treat RA who failed to a JAKi and subsequently to one or more bDMARDs and then switched to a second JAKi. To assess drug survival, electronic medical records of each patient were reviewed. Data on whether the second JAKi was discontinued, and the reasons for discontinuation were collected. The change of disease activity was assessed by analyzing changes in tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), patient’s global assessment of disease activity on a visual-analogue scale (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Disease Activity Score for 28 joints with ESR (DAS28-ESR), and DAS28-CRP from baseline to that at six months from initiation of the second JAKi. Results Overall, discontinuation of the second JAKi occurred in 20 (62.5%) patients. Primary failure, secondary failure, adverse events, and insurance coverage issues were the reasons for discontinuation in 9 (45.0%), 5 (25.0%), 2 (10.0%), and 4 (20.0%) patients, respectively. The estimated 2-year drug survival rate was 39.3%. In terms of change of disease activity, the second JAKi significantly improved TJC (p

Background: Drug survival, which refers to the time from treatment initiation to discontinuation, provides a surrogate measure of the effectiveness of a biologic in a real‐world setting (J Invest Dermatol, 2015, 135, 1). The aim of this study was to determine the drug survival of biologics that are currently available in Australia. We also analysed the treatment efficacy of these biologics and reasons for discontinuation. Methods: Retrospective data from outpatient Dermatology biologic clinics in Westmead Hospital and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Sydney, Australia) from April 2006 to December 2020 were collected. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to calculate drug survival. Results: A total of 306 patients who underwent 566 treatment courses were analysed. Guselkumab was observed to have the longest drug survival, with cumulative drug survival rates of 94.2% ± 4.0 at 1‐ and 5‐years. This was followed by ixekizumab which had a 1‐year survival rate of 87.2% ± 4.5 and 5‐year survival rate of 59.4% ± 9.5. Ixekizumab and guselkumab were also noted to have superior treatment efficacy compared with other biologics, with PASI‐75 rates of 94.9% and 93.8%, respectively. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were a lack of initial efficacy to treatment and a loss of efficacy over time despite an initial response, respectively. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first Australian study to report on outcomes of multiple new biologics that are currently in use for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Overall, this study provides insight into patterns of care from a local experience that may help guide the management of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives To compare the tolerability and effectiveness of two different classes of biological DMARDs [IL-17 and IL-23(p19) inhibitors, IL-17i and IL-23(p19)i] relative to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) regarding the drug survival rates and treatment outcomes in patients with PsA. Methods We emulated a target trial on comparative effectiveness using observational data from a prospective cohort study based on the Parker Institute's PsA cohort (the PIPA cohort). All patients underwent interview and a clinical examination programme at baseline and at follow-up visits at 4 and 12 months. The primary endpoint, drug survival, was assessed up to 12 months from baseline. We estimated hazard ratios from proportional hazards model and used propensity score adjustment in an attempt to deconfound and emulate a random treatment assignment. Results We included a total of 109 patients in the intention-to-monitor population at baseline initiating either TNFi (75 patients), IL-17i (26 patients) or IL-23(19)i (8 patients). Hazard ratios in the propensity adjusted model comparing IL-17i and IL-23(p19)i with TNFi were 1.36 (95% CI 0.59–3.14) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.10–3.24), respectively. TNFi and IL-17i had comparable effects regarding response rates and changes in clinical outcomes after 12 months, whereas IL-23(p19)i tended to perform better overall. Conclusion No decisive differences between drugs were observed at group level regarding drug survival and clinical outcomes after 12 months. TNFi, IL-17i and IL-23(p19)i may all be considered equally effective in the treatment of patients with PsA, advocating for investigating more in personalized treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Objective: The main aims of our study were to explore the drug survival and effectiveness of secukinumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). (2) Methods: We underwent a retrospective analysis of consecutive axSpA treated with secukinumab as a first line of biologics or at switch in a biologic-experienced population. Efficacy data, indicating improvement in inflammation parameters (such as C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and disease activity scores (such as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score [ASDAS-CRP], Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI]), and patient-reported outcomes (pain), were assessed at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months. The drug survival rate, dropout rate and discontinuation reasons (efficacy versus safety) of secukinumab were assessed in subgroup analysis (axSpA with and without exposure to biologics). (3) Results: In total, 46 patients were exposed to the IL-17A inhibitor secukinumab. The drug survival for axSpA patients 59.7% at 12 months and 31.3% at 24 months. There were no statistically significant differences in the median drug survival between biologic-naïve versus biologic-experienced subgroups. (4) Conclusions: Secukinumab has demonstrated effectiveness and safety in treating a cohort of axSpA patients in real-world settings, with a notable retention rate of the drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Biologics for psoriasis are efficient and safe, but very expensive. We investigated the association of the reducing copayment program (RCP) with changes in biologics use patterns depending on the income levels of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. This nationwide cohort study included patients identified as having moderate-to-severe psoriasis between 2014 and 2020. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio for the use of biologics according to income levels. Among 57,139 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, 3464 (6.1%) used biologics for psoriasis from 2014 to 2020. After the introduction of RCP in 2017, the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using biologics rapidly increased from 5.0% in 2016 to 19.2% in 2020; the increase was more remarkable in patients with the lowest or mid-low income compared to those with Medical Aid. Drug survival of biologics was higher in patients with the highest income before the RCP, but became comparable between those with high and low incomes after RCP introduction. The introduction of RCP was associated with an increased use of biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis of all income levels; however, the effect was more pronounced in low-income patients. The RCP may contribute to alleviating the disparity in access to biologics.

Background: Antimalarial agents (AMAs) are cornerstone drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and their use has established benefits, such as improved prognosis and decelerated accrual of organ damage. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of discontinuation of AMAs and associated factors in a Swedish SLE population. Methods: We retrieved data from a regional SLE register where all patients fulfilled the 1982 ACR and/or the 2012 SLICC classification criteria. A total of 328 subjects were included in the analysis. Results: Altogether, 92.4% (303/328) had been prescribed AMAs at some point during their disease. At the last available visit, 67.7% (222/328) were currently prescribed AMAs. Among individuals who had discontinued use, 24.7% (20/81) had developed a contraindication. Side effects were also common reasons for discontinuation (n = 38); gastrointestinal symptoms (52.6%, 20/38) were most common. Patients who discontinued had accrued more organ damage at the last visit (mean SDI: 2.9; SD: 2.8) compared with those still on AMAs (mean SDI: 1.4; SD: 1.8; p = 0.001). Conclusions: Most patients had been exposed to AMAs, but 25% discontinued therapy. Among side effects leading to discontinuation, >50% were gastrointestinal, calling for adequate gastroprotection towards drug retention and prevention of organ damage progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Secukinumab (SEC) has been shown to be highly effective and safe in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PsO), but data on SEC's long-term drug survival are limited. Aim: To analyse the survival rate of SEC and its predictive factors of survival, together with the drug safety and efficacy. Material and methods: Data of 268 patients who received SEC between May 2018 and April 2022 with moderate to severe psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis were analysed retrospectively. Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) was used to define effectiveness. Drug survival was examined using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis was used to analyse predictive factors. Results: PASI 75/90/100 responses achieved at week 16 (89.5%, 78%, and 16.2%, respectively) were well maintained at week 52 (96.3%, 90.7%, and 15.4%, respectively). The drug survival probability rates for SEC were 94.4% at 12 months, 88.4% at 24 months, 78.6% after 3 years, 52.7% after 4 years. Concomitant treatments, dose escalation and family history of psoriasis were associated with a higher risk for SEC withdrawal. Conclusions: Close monitoring may improve SEC survival in psoriasis patients who require dose escalation and concomitant drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To characterize disease activity trajectories and compare long-term drug retention between rheumatoid (RA) and spondylarthritis (SpA) patients initiating tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment (etanercept). Prospective observational study of RA, axial (AxSpA) and peripheral SpA (PerSpA) patients initiating etanercept during 2004–2020. Kaplan–Meier plots were used for drug retention comparisons and multivariable Cox regression models for predictors of discontinuation. Long-term disease activity trajectories were identified by latent class growth models using DAS28-ESR or ASDAS-CRP as outcome for RA and AxSpA respectively. We assessed 711 patients (450 RA, 178 AxSpA and 83 PerSpA) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 12 (5–32) months. At 5 years, 22%, 30% and 21% of RA, AxSpA and PerSpA patients, respectively, remained on therapy. Etanercept discontinuation was independent of the diagnosis and was predicted by gender and obesity in both RA and SpA groups. Four disease activity (DA) trajectories were identified from 6th month of treatment in both RA and AxSpA. RA patients in remission-low DA groups (33.7%) were younger, had shorter disease duration, fewer comorbidities and lower baseline disease activity compared to moderate (40.6%) & high DA (25.7%) groups. In AxSpA 74% were in inactive-low DA and they were more often males, non-obese and had lower number of comorbidities compared to higher ASDAS-CRP trajectories. In RA and AxSpA patients, disease activity trajectories revealed heterogeneity of TNFi treatment responses and prognosis. Male gender, lower baseline disease activity and fewer comorbidities, characterize a favourable outcome in terms of disease burden accrual and TNFi survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Limited real-world data are available on upadacitinib drug survival in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To investigate upadacitinib drug survival, and the reasons and predictors of drug discontinuation in AD patients. Methods: All consecutive patients aged 18–75 years, affected by moderate-to-severe AD, and treated with upadacitinib for more than 1 month at dermatological clinics were included during November 2020–August 2023. Upadacitinib survival was investigated through Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the predictors through multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Overall, 325 adult AD patients (mean (SD) age, 38.6(15.6) years) had a 1-year and 1.5-year upadacitinib drug survival of 91.5% and 80.2%, respectively. The main reasons for drug discontinuation (25/325, 7.7%) were adverse events (4.9%), including cutaneous or infectious diseases (1.5%), such as acne and herpes zoster; blood test changes (1.2%), including hypercholesterolemia, creatine phosphokinase or liver enzyme elevation, and lymphopenia; urinary or respiratory infections (0.9%); deep venous thrombosis (0.3%); malignancies (0.3%); loss of consciousness (0.3%); and arthralgias (0.3%); followed by ineffectiveness (0.6%). No specific characteristic was significantly associated with an increased risk of upadacitinib discontinuation. Conclusions: Our findings show that upadacitinib was effective in moderate-to-severe AD after more than 1 year of continuous treatment but point to the need for clinical and laboratory monitoring of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The aim was to assess the use and drug survival of IL-17Ai in a real-world cohort of axial SpA (axSpA) and PsA patients. Methods Patients ever commenced on an IL-17Ai (secukinumab or ixekizumab) for axSpA or PsA at the Leeds Specialist Spondyloarthritis Service were identified. Demographics, IL-17Ai treatment length and reason for cessation were collected. Drug survival data were plotted as a Kaplan–Meier curve, with log rank test of median survival compared between axSpA and PsA. Cox regression analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between diagnosis and length of drug survival. Results In total, 228 patients (91 axSpA and 137 PsA) were exposed to IL-17Ai. Drug survival for all patients at 12 months was 69% (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 63, 75%) and at 24 months 60% (95% CI 54, 67%). In axSpA and PsA, drug survival at 12 months was 63% (CI 54, 74%) and 73% (CI 66, 81%), respectively, and at 24 months it was 53% (CI 44, 65%) and 65% (CI 57, 75%), respectively. Median survival did not differ significantly between both diseases (log rank test 0.65). There was no association between diagnosis and survival (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.63, 1.33), including when adjusting for age, previous biologic DMARD usage and sex (hazard ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.61, 1.13). Conclusion This is the first study, to our knowledge, to analyse and compare real-world IL-17Ai drug survival in patients with axSpA and PsA from a single centre. We demonstrate that there is no difference in IL-17Ai survival rates and no relationship between diagnosis and drug survival. These results contribute to the body of real-world evidence confirming the role of IL-17Ai in the management of axSpA and PsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Significant advances in psoriasis treatment have taken place since the introduction of biologics. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the first class of biologics approved and at that time greatly improved psoriasis treatment. However, newer biologics, directed to interleukin(IL)-23/IL-17 pathways central to psoriasis pathogenesis, have improved complete or nearly complete clearance rates and are characterized by an excellent safety profile. Real-world setting experiences have generally confirmed the results of clinical trials, but real-world data regarding newer biologics is relatively scarce. We provide an extensive review of real-world survival of biologic treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis. There is growing and consistent evidence of higher drug survival of IL-23 inhibitors, possibly due to their favorable efficacy and safety profiles, dosing convenience and persistence of response despite treatment interruption; eventual confirmation of their potential role as modifiers of the natural history of psoriasis might provide additional reasons for therapeutic persistence of this class of biologics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Data about the long-term effectiveness of brodalumab could be valuable in assessing patient adherence to treatment and improving psoriasis management. Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate the drug survival of brodalumab and identify any predictive factors for discontinuation. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who were treated for up to 3 years. We extracted data from patient files, related to the characteristics of the patients and the disease. Drug survival analysis was descriptively analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess baseline patient characteristics that predicted clinical response. Results: The study included 90 patients. Among them, 28 (31.1%) suspended brodalumab through the observation period. At weeks 52, 104 and 156 the median PASI score were 0.0 [0.0 – 0.8], 0.0 [0.0 – 1.0] and 0.0 [0.0 – 0.0], respectively. The estimated cumulative survival rates at weeks 52 and 104 were 86.32% and 78.09%, respectively. In the multivariable survival analysis, predictor factors for overall discontinuation included body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.18), baseline PASI (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02 - 1.10), and psoriatic arthritis (OR 5.05, 95% CI 0.89 - 13.50). Conclusions: Brodalumab has shown long-term effectiveness for up to 3 years. Considering baseline disease severity and patient characteristics could aid in optimizing the long-term management of psoriasis.

Filomena Russo,1 Marco Galluzzo,2,3 Luca Stingeni,4 Severino Persechino,5 Leonardo Zichichi,6 Andrea Conti,7 Claudia Giofrè,8 Valentina Dini,9 Martina Vispi,10 Laura Atzori,11 Angelo Cattaneo,12 Aurora Parodi,13 Federico Bardazzi,14 Giuseppe Stinco,15 Paolo Dapavo,16 Giampiero Girolomoni,17 Maria Letizia Musumeci,18 Manuela Papini,19 Marina Venturini,20 Stefano Dastoli,21 Sergio Di Nuzzo,22 Maria Concetta Fargnoli,23 Gianluca Pagnanelli,24 Nicoletta Bernardini,25 Daniele Mario Gambini,26 Piergiorgio Malagoli,27 Carlo Mazzatenta,28 Ketty Peris,29 Iris Zalaudek,30 Gabriella Fabbrocini31 ,† Francesco Loconsole,32 Camilla Vassallo,33 Lucia Pietroleonardo,34 Francesca Prignano,35 Chiara Franchi,36 Anna Maria Offidani,37 Claudio Bonifati,38 Vito Di Lernia,39 Giovanni Gigante,40 Marta Silvia Bartezaghi,40 Matteo Franchi,41,42 Paola Ursoleo,40 Elisabetta Aloisi40 1Dermatology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, University of Siena, S. Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy; 2Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 3Dermatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico “Tor Vergata”, Rome, Italy; 4Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 5Dermatology Unit, NESMOS Department, Faculty of Medicine & Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy; 6Unit of Dermatology, San Antonio Abate Hospital, Trapani, Italy; 7Section of Dermatology, Department of Specialized Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 8U.O.C. Dermatologia, A.O. Papardo, Messina, Italy; 9Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine and Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 10Dermatology Unit, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy; 11Dermatology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 12Dermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano, Italy; 13Section of Dermatology, DiSSal University of Genoa, Ospedale-Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genova, Italy; 14Dermatology Division, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 15Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy; 16Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 17Section of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 18Section of Dermatology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 19Dermatology Clinic of Terni, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; 20Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; 21Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy; 22Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy; 23Section of Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 24Department of Dermatology, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata - IRCCS, Roma, Italy; 25Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Dermatology Unit, “Daniele Innocenzi”, Asl Latina, Italy; 26Dermatology Unit, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy; 27Dermatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy; 28Dermatology Unit, Lucca Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy; 29Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy; 30Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; 31Section of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; 32Department of Dermatology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy; 33Institute of Dermatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 34Dermatology Unit, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy; 35Dermatology Clinic, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 36Dermatology Unit, IRCCS IO Galeazzi, Milan, Italy; 37Dermatological Clinic, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy; 38Department of Dermatology, Istituto Dermatologico San Gallicano - IRCCS, Roma, Italy; 39Dermatology Unit, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy; 40Novartis Farma SpA, Origgio, Italy; 41National Centre for Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Milan, Italy; 42Laboratory of Healthcare Research and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy†Gabriella Fabbrocini passed away on 3 March 2023Correspondence: Filomena Russo, Dermatology Section, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neurological Science, University of Siena, S. Maria Alle Scotte Hospital, Siena, Italy, Email file.russo@libero.itPurpose: SUPREME, a phase IIIb study conducted in Italy, demonstrated safety and high efficacy of secukinumab for up to 72 weeks in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. SUPREME 2.0 study aimed to provide real-world data on the long-term drug survival and effectiveness of secukinumab beyond 72 weeks.Patients and Methods: SUPREME 2.0 is a retrospective observational chart review study conducted in patients previously enrolled in SUPREME study. After the end of the SUPREME study, eligible patients continued treatment as per clinical practice, and their effectiveness and drug survival data were retrieved from medical charts.Results: Of the 415 patients enrolled in the SUPREME study, 297 were included in SUPREME 2.0; of which, 210 (70.7%) continued secukinumab treatment throughout the 42-month observation period. Patients in the biologic-naïve cohort had higher drug survival than those in the biologic-experienced cohort (74.9% vs 61.7%), while HLA-Cw6–positive and HLA-Cw6–negative patients showed similar drug survival (69.3% and 71.9%). After 42 months, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 was achieved by 79.6% of patients overall; with a similar proportion of biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients achieving PASI90 (79.8% and 79.1%). The mean absolute PASI score reduced from 21.94 to 1.38 in the overall population, 21.90 to 1.24 in biologic-naïve and 22.03 to 1.77 in biologic-experienced patients after 42 months. The decrease in the absolute PASI score was comparable between HLA-Cw6–positive and HLA–Cw6-negative patients. The baseline Dermatology Life Quality Index scores also decreased in the overall patients (10.5 to 2.32) and across all study sub-groups after 42 months. Safety was consistent with the known profile of secukinumab, with no new findings.Conclusion: In this real-world cohort study, secukinumab showed consistently high long-term drug survival and effectiveness with a favourable safety profile.Keywords: psoriasis, secukinumab, real-world evidence, drug survival, SUPREME

Introduction: Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatics drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) are important treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). As more of these drugs become available, there is a greater need to assess their real-world adherence and drug survival. Methods: Treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with RA who initiated treatment with bDMARDs and tofactinib during 2015–2018 in a large Israeli health maintenance organization were included. Adherence and time to treatment suspension were recorded. Odds for adherence were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model. Risk for treatment suspension was estimated using a mixed-effect Cox proportional hazard model. Results: The analysis included 753 eligible patients (61.8% treatment-naïve) treated with 1287 treatment episodes (tofacitinib 24.2%, tocilizumab 17.5%, etanercept 16.0%, adalimumab 10.4%, abatacept 9.9%, rituximab 9.0%, golimumab 6.9%, certolizumab pegol 3.6%, infliximab 1.9%, and sarilumab 0.5%). Good adherence was measured for almost all drugs, yet over 50% of all treatment episodes were suspended. Older age was associated with reduced risk for treatment suspension while higher number of primary care visits and higher Charlson's comorbidity score were associated with increased risk. Compared to etanercept, treatment with adalimumab, certolizumab, or rituximab was associated with increased risk for treatment suspension (HR 1.68 95% CI 1.27–2.22, HR 1.62 95% CI 1.00–2.60, and HR 2.72 95% CI 2.02–3.67, respectively). Conclusion: Treatment choice primarily depends on disease activity and prognosis. Real-world data, showing differences in drug survival of bDMARDs and tsDMARD, can also be used in the variety of considerations when choosing treatment. Future studies could separate patients with RA into subgroups, which would also account for potential drug survival differences and enable personalized therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The purpose of this study was to analyze the drug survival rate of dupilumab up to 2 years in a large real-world cohort of adult patients affected by moderate/severe atopic dermatitis (AD), and to investigate the clinical, demographic and predictive factors influencing the patients’ treatment persistence. Material and methods This study included adult patients affected by moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab for at least 16 weeks who visited 7 dermatologic outpatient clinics in Lazio, Italy, from January 2019 until August 2021. Results A total of 659 adult patients (345 male [52.3%], mean age: 42.8 years) with an average treatment duration of 23.3 months were enrolled in the study. Overall, 88.6% and 76.1% of patients were still on treatment after 12 and 24 months, respectively. The drug survival rate for discontinuation due to AEs and dupilumab ineffectiveness was 95.0% at 12 months and 90.0% at 24 months. The main reasons for drug discontinuation included inefficacy (29.6%), failed compliance (17.4%), persistent efficacy (20.4%) and adverse events (7.8%). Adult AD onset (≥18 years) and EASI score severity measured at the last follow-up visit were the only factors significantly associated with lower drug survival. Conclusion This study revealed an increased cumulative probability of dupilumab survival at 2 years, reflected by a sustained effectiveness and a favorable safety profile of the drug.

Several non-randomized clinical trials and retrospective studies have demonstrated encouraging efficacy and well-tolerated safety of tofacitinib in the treatment of alopecia areata. However, there are scarce data on a large cohort of patients with alopecia areata in long-term real-world practice. This single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study included 126 patients with alopecia areata treated with tofacitinib between February 2021 and December 2022. The aims of this study are to evaluate drug survival, effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib for treatment of alopecia areata, and to identify potential factors influencing long-term outcomes. Median duration of treatment was 23.00 (interquartile range (IQR) 15.00, 47.25) weeks. Median all-cause survival time of 126 patients treated with tofacitinib was 44 weeks (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 36.3, 51.7), and the all-cause drug retention rate at 12 weeks, 24 weeks and 48 weeks were 90.0%, 66.4% and 42.3%, respectively. The most common reason for discontinuation was complete remission/satisfaction. A total of 80 patients treated with tofacitinib for over 6 months were included in the efficacy analysis, the overall complete response rate at 24 weeks was 33.8% (27/80). No life-threatening serious adverse events occurred. Sex is an independent risk factor in predicting patient outcomes. This real-world study confirmed the high effectiveness and acceptable safety profile of tofacitinib in alopecia areata, with a satisfactory drug survival rate, and provides supporting data for the clinical application of tofacitinib in Chinese patients with alopecia areata.

Background/aim: Adipose tissue produces several inflammatory mediators. Thus, obesity affects the disease course and the responses to the antirheumatic agents in inflammatory diseases. The aim of the study was to determine whether the body mass index (BMI) is involved in the response to rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Materials and methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 206 RA patients who received rituximab from the Turkish Biologic (TURKBIO) registry between 2011 and the end of May 2017. Demographic and clinical data including age, sex, disease type, disease duration, and previous or current treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological drug durations are stored in the database. Patients with a BMI =30 kg/m2 were classified as obese, and patients with a BMI <30 kg/m2 were classified as nonobese. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to estimate the drug survival. The subgroups were compared using the log-rank test. Results: The mean BMI of 206 patients included in the study was 27.05 (17.2-43.4) kg/m2. There were 59 (28.6%) patients in the obese group and 147 (71.4%) patients in the nonobese group. The mean age, female percentage, and baseline disease activity score 28 (DAS28) were higher in the obese group than in the nonobese group. However, the ?DAS28 at both 6 and 12 months were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.785 and p = 0.512, respectively). Patient pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), patient fatigue VAS, and patient global VAS scores were also significantly higher at baseline in the obese group (p = 0.003, p = 0.006, and p = 0.006, respectively). However, no significant difference was found in terms of changes in patient pain VAS, patient fatigue VAS, patient global VAS and physician global VAS scores at 6 and 12 months compared to those at baseline. Rituximab treatment was ongoing for 71.2% of the obese and 63.3% of the nonobese patients (p = 0.279). The median drug survival duration was 77 months in the obese group and 62 months in the nonobese group (p = 0.053). The estimated drug survival rates for rituximab were not statistically significantly different in the obese and nonobese groups. Rituximab-related side effects were also similar between the groups. Conclusion: In obese and nonobese patients with RA, rituximab treatment exhibits similar side effects and similar long-term efficacy. These results suggest that obesity does not alter drug survival for rituximab and response rates, in RA and rituximab may be a favorable treatment agent in patients with RA and obesity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The aim was to evaluate retention rates for secukinumab in patients with active PsA or radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) treated in routine UK clinical practice. Methods SERENA (CAIN457A3403) is an ongoing, non-interventional, international study of patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, active PsA or active r-axSpA, who had received secukinumab for ≥16 weeks before enrolment. The primary objective of this interim analysis was to assess treatment retention rates in patients with PsA or r-axSpA who were enrolled and followed for ≥2 years at centres in the UK. The safety analysis set includes all patients who received at least one dose of secukinumab. The target population set includes all patients who fulfilled the patient selection criteria. Results The safety set comprised 189 patients (PsA, n  = 81; r-axSpA, n  = 108), and the target population set comprised 183 patients (PsA, n  = 78; r-axSpA, n  = 105). In the safety set, 107 patients (45 of 81 with PsA and 62 of 108 with r-axSpA) had previously received a biologic agent. Retention rates were similar between patients with PsA and r-axSpA after 1 year (PsA 91.0%, 95% CI: 84.0, 98.0; r-axSpA 89.2%, 95% CI: 82.7, 95.7) and 2 years (PsA 77.6%, 95% CI: 67.6, 87.7; r-axSpA 76.2%, 95% CI: 67.4, 85.0) of observation. Overall, 17.5% of patients (33 of 189) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event, and 12.7% of patients (24 of 189) discontinued secukinumab because of adverse events. Conclusion This analysis of real-world data from the UK demonstrates high retention rates for secukinumab over 2 years in patients with PsA or r-axSpA, with a favourable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ying Li1,2 &ast;, Jia-Jing Lu1,2 &ast;, Xiao-Yuan Zhong1,2 &ast;, Ying-Yuan Yu1,2 &ast;, Ning Yu,1,2 Yu Wang,1,2 Xue-Mei Yi,1,2 Yang-Feng Ding,1,2 Yu-Ling Shi1,2 1Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; 2Institute of Psoriasis, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Yu-Ling Shi; Yang-Feng Ding, Department of Dermatology, Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 1278 Road, Shanghai, 200443, People’s Republic of China, Email shiyuling1973@tongji.edu.cn; dingyangfeng@hotmail.comBackground: Data pertaining to biologic agents used for treating psoriasis in real-world settings are lacking at present. To compare drug survival at 52 weeks for a range of biologics used to treat psoriasis under real-world conditions.Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study of a cohort of patients diagnosed with plaque psoriasis treated using ixekizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, or adalimumab between January 2020 and December 2021. Baseline demographic characteristics, duration of psoriasis, and prior biological treatments for all patients were recorded. Drug survival rates were analyzed in different patient groups using Kaplan–Meier curves and Log rank tests.Results: In total, this study included 386 plaque psoriasis patients, of whom 70, 175, 36, and 105 were, respectively, treated using ixekizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, and adalimumab. Over a 52-week period, the overall cumulative drug survival rates for ixekizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, and adalimumab were 67.1%, 63.0%, 72.2%, and 37.1%, respectively. Lack of efficacy was the primary cause of discontinuation for these biologic therapies, followed by economic burden and adverse event incidence.Conclusion: These results suggest that guselkumab exhibited superior drug survival, drug survival outcomes for ixekizumab and secukinumab were comparable, and significantly better than those of adalimumab in China. Preventing a loss of drug efficacy represents a primary approach to improving biologic drug survival in psoriasis patients.Keywords: biologics, drug survival, real-world, psoriasis, ixekizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, adalimumab

Psoriasis affects approximately 0.3% of the Japanese population. Recently, various effective systemic drugs have become available, and the continuation of a given treatment has become critical because of the chronic nature of psoriasis. Factors affecting drug survival (the time until treatment discontinuation) in psoriasis treatment include efficacy, safety, ease of use, and patient preference. In the present study, the authors retrospectively surveyed a multifacility patient registry to determine the real‐world evidence of the survival rate of systemic interventions for psoriasis treatment. Patients with psoriasis who visited 20 facilities in the Western Japan area between January 2019 and May 2020 and gave written consent were registered as study participants, and their medical history of systemic interventions for psoriasis (starting from 2010) was retrospectively collected and analyzed. The drugs investigated were adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, cyclosporine, and apremilast. When drugs were discontinued, the reasons were also recorded. A total of 1003 patients with psoriasis including 268 with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) were enrolled. In biologics, more recently released drugs such as interleukin 17 inhibitors showed a numerically higher survival rate in the overall (post‐2010) analysis. However, in the subset of patients who began treatment after 2017, the difference in the survival rate among the drugs was smaller. The reasons for discontinuing drugs varied, but a loss of efficacy against dermatological or joint symptoms were relatively frequently seen with some biologics and cyclosporine. The stratification of drug survival rates based on patient characteristics such as bio‐naive or experienced, normal weight or obese, and with or without PsA, revealed that bio‐experienced, obese, and PsA groups had poorer survival rates for most drugs. No notable safety issues were identified in this study. Overall, the present study revealed that the biologics show differences in their tendency to develop a loss of efficacy, and the factors that negatively impact the survival rate of biologics include the previous use of biologics, obesity, and PsA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Randomized controlled trials showed high comparability of biosimilar rituximab (bs-RTX) GP2013 to biologic originator RTX (bo-RTX). Data on effectiveness of switching from bo-RTX to bs-RTX, starting therapy with bs-RTX, and bs-RTX drug survival in real-world setting are sparse. To explore long-term drug effectiveness and survival of bs-RTX GP2013 in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients both naïve to and mandatory switched from bo-RTX, and to clarify reasons for treatment cessation. Retrospective observational cohort study including RA outpatient clinic patients treated with bs-RTX between 2018 and 2021 in Norway. Patients were examined and monitored using recommended measures for disease activity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). For description of population medians and interquartile range were used. Difference between observation times was assessed with Signed-Rank test, drug survival with Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Reasons for discontinuation were ascertained. Among 110 patients, at baseline, 88 were mandatory switched from bo-RTX and 22 were RTX-naïve. During 2-year follow-up, disease activity and PROs measures remained stable in switchers subgroup and improved in subgroup starting bs-RTX for the first time. Overall drug survival was 80.0% after 1 year and 57.7% after 2 years and was significantly higher in bs-RTX-switched than in bs-RTX-naïve patients (p = 0.036). Two most frequently reported reasons for drug discontinuation were remission (38.6%) and doctor's decision (27.1%). RA patients treated with bs-RTX had satisfactory treatment response and drug retention rates which supports equivalence of bs-RTX GP2013 to bo-RTX, both in patients naïve to and mandatory switched from bo-RTX. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to analyze the drug survival rate of dupilumab up to 2 years in a large real-world cohort of adult patients affected by moderate/severe atopic dermatitis (AD), and to investigate the clinical, demographic and predictive factors influencing the patients' treatment persistence. This study included adult patients affected by moderate-to-severe AD treated with dupilumab for at least 16 weeks who visited 7 dermatologic outpatient clinics in Lazio, Italy, from January 2019 until August 2021. A total of 659 adult patients (345 male [52.3%], mean age: 42.8 years) with an average treatment duration of 23.3 months were enrolled in the study. Overall, 88.6% and 76.1% of patients were still on treatment after 12 and 24 months, respectively. The drug survival rate for discontinuation due to AEs and dupilumab ineffectiveness was 95.0% at 12 months and 90.0% at 24 months. The main reasons for drug discontinuation included inefficacy (29.6%), failed compliance (17.4%), persistent efficacy (20.4%) and adverse events (7.8%). Adult AD onset (≥18 years) and EASI score severity measured at the last follow-up visit were the only factors significantly associated with lower drug survival. This study revealed an increased cumulative probability of dupilumab survival at 2 years, reflected by a sustained effectiveness and a favorable safety profile of the drug. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: Information on the performance of ixekizumab (IXE) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in clinical practice is scarce. We aimed to analyze the retention rate and safety of IXE in patients with PsA in routine clinical practice. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal observational single-center study of all patients with PsA who had received at least one dose of IXE. Adverse events (AEs) and drug retention rate were the main study focus. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and predictive factors using multivariate Cox regression analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) was used as a measure of the association. Results: Seventy-two patients were included (52 women and 20 men). Median disease duration was 5 years (IQR 3–9). More than 90% received ≥2 biologic and/or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) prior to IXE. Ixekizumab showed a 1-year retention rate of 65% and a 2-year retention rate of 57%. Regarding discontinuation due to AEs, 0.18 AEs per person-year were identified. The number of previous biologics did not influence drug survival but prior use of methotrexate (HR 2.31 (95% CI 1.05–5.10), p < 0.05) and depression (HR 2.40 (95% CI 1.07–5.41), p < 0.05) increased the risk of IXE discontinuation. Conclusions: Ixekizumab showed a good retention rate in a PsA population mostly refractory to biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Drug survival was consistently good regardless of age, gender, metabolic comorbidities, smoking status, or prior number of biologic therapies. This information may be of interest to better position this drug in the PsA treatment algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]