Search

Heart failure (HF) remains a condition associated with high morbidity, mortality, and associated costs. Although the number of medical and device-based therapies available to treat HF are expanding at a remarkable rate, disparities in the risk for incident HF and treatments delivered to patients are also of growing concern. These disparities span across racial and ethnic groups, socioeconomic status, and apply across the spectrum of HF from stage A to stage D. The complexity of HF risk and treatment is further impacted by the number of patients who experience the downstream impact of social determinants of health. The purpose of this document is to highlight the known health care disparities that exist in the care of patients with HF and to provide a context for how clinicians and researchers should assess both biological and social determinants of HF risk in vulnerable populations. Furthermore, this document provides a framework for future steps that can be used to help diminish inequalities in access and clinical outcomes over time, and offer solutions to help decrease disparities within HF care.

The proposed donor heart selection guidelines provide evidence-based and expert-consensus recommendations for the selection of donor hearts following brain death. These recommendations were compiled by an international panel of experts based on an extensive literature review. © 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

BackgroundBlack Americans have a higher risk of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) than White Americans. We aimed to evaluate racial disparities in the risk of tachyarrhythmias among patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).MethodsThe study population comprised 3,895 ICD recipients enrolled in the U.S. in primary prevention ICD trials. Outcome measures included first and recurrent ventricular tachy-arrhythmia (VTA) and atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA), derived from adjudicated device data, and death. Outcomes were compared between self-reported Black vs. White patients with a cardiomyopathy (ischemic [ICM] and NICM).ResultsBlack patients were more likely to be female (35% vs 22%) and younger (57±12 vs 62±12) with a higher frequency of comorbidities. Blacks patients with NICM compared with Whites patients had a higher rate of first VTA, fast VTA, ATA, appropriate-, and inappropriate-ICD-therapy (VTA≥170bpm: 32% vs. 20%; VTA≥200bpm: 22% vs. 14%; ATA: 25% vs. 12%; appropriate 30% vs 20%; and inappropriate: 25% vs. 11%; pburdenof VTA, ATA, ICD therapies, and a higher risk of death (HR=1.86; p=0.014). In contrast, in ICM, the risk of all types of tachyarrhythmia, ICD therapy, or death was similar between Black and White patients.ConclusionsAmong NICM patients with an ICD for primary prevention, Black compared with White patients had a high risk and burden of VTA, ATA, and ICD therapies.Clinical PerspectiveWhat Is New?Black patients have a higher risk of developing non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) but are under-represented in clinical trials of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Therefore, data on disparities in the presentation and outcomes in this population are limited.This analysis represents the largest group of self-identified Black patients implanted in the U.S. with an ICD for primary prevention with adjudication of all arrhythmic events.What Are the Clinical Implications?In patients with a NICM, self-identified Black compared to White patients experienced an increased incidence and burden of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, atrial tachyarrhythmia, and ICD therapies. These differenced were not observed in Black vs White patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).Although Black patients with NICM were implanted at a significantly younger age (57±12 vs 62±12 years), they experienced a 2-fold higher rate of all-cause mortality during a mean follow up of 3 years compared with White patients.These findings highlight the need for early intervention with an ICD, careful monitoring, and intensification of heart failure and antiarrhythmic therapies among Black patients with NICM.

BACKGROUND: While sex-related differences in transplant outcomes have been well characterized amongst adults, there are no sex-specific pediatric heart transplant studies over the last decade and none evaluating waitlist outcomes. In a contemporary cohort of children undergoing heart transplantation in the United States, this analysis was performed to determine if there were sex disparities in waitlist and/or post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective review of Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from December 16, 2011 to February 28, 2019 to compare male and female children after listing and after transplant. Demographic, clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared unadjusted and after 1:1 propensity matching for selected covariates. RESULTS: Of 4089 patients, 2299 (56%) were males. At listing, males were more likely to be older, have congenital heart disease (58% vs 48%), renal dysfunction (49% vs 44%) and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (9% vs 7%). At transplant, males were more likely to have renal (42 % vs 35%) and liver dysfunction (13% vs 10%), PRA >10% (29% vs 22%) and ischemic time >3.5 hours (p

Heart failure affects over 2.6 million women and 3.4 million men in the United States with known sex differences in epidemiology, management, response to treatment, and outcomes across a wide spectrum of cardiomyopathies that include peripartum cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, stress cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and sarcoidosis. Some of these sex-specific considerations are driven by the cellular effects of sex hormones on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, endothelial response to injury, vascular aging, and left ventricular remodeling. Other sex differences are perpetuated by implicit bias leading to undertreatment and underrepresentation in clinical trials. The goal of this narrative review is to comprehensively examine the existing literature over the last decade regarding sex differences in various heart failure syndromes from pathophysiological insights to clinical practice.

For over 30 years, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) International Thoracic Organ Transplant (TTX) Registry has gathered data regarding transplant procedures, donor and recipient characteristics, and outcomes from a global community of transplant centers. Almost 70,000 adult lung transplant procedures have been reported to the Registry since its inception, each one providing an opportunity for a recipient with end-stage lung disease to regain quality of life and longevity. With each year’s report, we provide more detailed analyses on a particular focus theme important to recipient outcomes. Since 2013, these have been donor and recipient age; retransplantation; early graft failure; indication for transplant; allograft ischemic time; multiorgan transplantation; and donor and recipient size matching.(1–7) In response to a changing regulatory environment, the ISHLT TTX Registry is undergoing an update in data acquisition, and the patient cohort examined in this report is therefore derived from the same data source or datasets as that examined in the 2019 annual reports.(2,8–10) We refer the reader to the 2019 and prior reports for a detailed description of the baseline characteristics of the cohort, and additional core analyses not directly related to the focus explored in this year’s report. To complement the 2020 report which focussed on donor characteristics, the goal of this year’s report was to focus entirely on changes in recipient factors over the past 3 decades and to identify important recipient characteristics and transplant processes that may influence post-transplant outcomes. Due to small numbers, heart-lung transplant recipient characteristics and transplant outcomes have not been included. This 38th annual adult lung transplant report is hence basedon data submitted to the ISHLT TTX Registry on 67,493 adult recipients of deceased recipient transplants between January 1, 1992 and June 30, 2018.

This in-depth review discusses cannabis as it relates to heart transplantation and the growing dilemma of legalization around the world creating disparities in transplant candidacy. One will learn about two of the most common cannabinoids: [Formula: see text]-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). These cannabinoids are metabolized by cytochrome P-450 and P glycoprotein, which are essential for the metabolism of drugs for transplantation, such as calcineurin inhibitors. Addiction, withdrawal, and cannabis use disorder will be reviewed as well as hyperemesis syndrome. Maintaining adequate immunosuppression will depend on a variety of factors, including drug-drug interactions, pharmacokinetics of cannabinoids and chronicity of cannabis usage. These drug interactions are further confounded by varying concentrations of cannabis products available at medical dispensaries. One will also learn about the outcomes of transplant recipients using cannabis such as graft failure and the risk of infections. Although more research is needed to establish transplant guidelines, the available data is concerning and fairness in organ distribution should not vary by transplant program or institution.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated that children in the United States who were of racial and ethnic minorities have inferior waitlist and post-heart transplant (HT) outcomes. Whether these disparities still exist in the contemporary era of increased ventricular assist device use remains unknown. METHODS: All children (age

Background: Restoring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is a therapeutic goal for older patients with advanced heart failure. We aimed to describe change in HRQOL in older patients (60–80 years) awaiting heart transplantation (HT) with or without pretransplant mechanical circulatory support (MCS) or scheduled for long-term MCS, if ineligible for HT, from before to 6 months after these surgeries and identify factors associated with change. Methods: Patients from 13 US sites completed the EuroQol 5-dimension 3L questionnaire and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 at baseline and 3 and 6 months after HT or long-term MCS. Analyses included univariate comparisons and multivariable linear regression. Results: Among 305 participants (cohort mean age=66.2±4.7 years, 78% male, 84% White, 55% New York Heart Association class IV), 161 underwent HT (n=68 with and n=93 without pretransplant MCS), and 144 received long-term MCS. From baseline to 3 months, EuroQol 5-dimension visual analog scale scores improved in HT patients without pretransplant MCS (54.5±24.3 versus 75.9±16.0, P P P P P =0.002). No further HRQOL improvement was found from 3 to 6 months. Factors most significantly associated with change in HRQOL, baseline 3 months, were right heart failure and 3-month New York Heart Association class, and 3 to 6 months, were 6-month New York Heart Association class and major bleeding. Conclusions: In older heart failure patients, HRQOL improved from before to early after HT and long-term MCS. At 6 postoperative months, HRQOL of long-term MCS patients was lower than one or both HT groups. Understanding change in HRQOL from before to early after these surgeries may enhance decision-making and guide patient care. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02568930.

Current guidelines for primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy do not account for sex differences in arrhythmic risk in ICD candidates.To evaluate the association between sex and risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) and mortality.This cohort study compared differences in the risk of VTA and mortality between 4506 men and women enrolled in the 4 Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trials (MADIT) between July 1, 1997, and December 31, 2011. Data from prospective randomized controlled multicenter studies were analyzed retrospectively. Men and women with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator who were enrolled in all MADIT studies were included. Data were analyzed between January 10 and June 10, 2021.ICD implant.The primary end point was sustained VTA, defined as ICD-recorded, treated or monitored VTA at least 170/min or ventricular fibrillation. Secondary VTA end points included VTA at least 200/min, appropriate ICD shocks, and appropriate antitachycardia pacing. All end points were included in a first and recurrent event analysis.Of the 4506 study participants, 3431 were men (76%). Mean (SD) age of the cohort was 64 (12) years. For women vs men, the mean (SD) age (64 [12] years vs 64 [11] years) and left ventricular ejection fraction (24% vs 25%) were similar, but women exhibited a higher frequency of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (454 of 1075 women [42%] vs 2535 of 3431 men [74%]). Women had significantly lower 3-year cumulative probability of sustained VTA (16% vs 26%), fast VTA (9% vs 17%), and appropriate ICD shocks (7% vs 15%) compared with men (P .001 for all). Multivariable analysis showed that female sex was independently associated with at least 40% lower risk of all first and recurrent VTA end points (P .001 for all), including the primary end point (first event, HR = 60 [95% CI, 50-73], P .001; recurrent event, HR = 49 [95% CI, 43-55], P .001), after accounting for the competing risk of all-cause mortality and nonarrhythmic mortality. The lower VTA risk associated with female sex was consistent in risk subsets but was significantly more pronounced in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (female vs male in the ischemic group: hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.95], P = .02; nonischemic group: hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.38-0.66], P .001; P = .03 for interaction between female sex and cardiomyopathy).Findings suggest that women display a significantly lower risk of first and recurrent life-threatening VTA events than men, and that it is more pronounced in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, suggesting a need for sex-specific risk assessment for primary prevention ICD therapy.

Objective Left ventricular assist devices require a psychosocial assessment to determine candidacy despite limited data correlating with outcome. Our objective is to determine whether the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant, a tool validated for transplant and widely used by left ventricular assist device programs, predicts left ventricular assist device program hospital readmissions and death. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of adults at the Cleveland Clinic with Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant scores before primary left ventricular assist device program implantation from April 1, 2013, to December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was unplanned hospital readmissions censored at death, transplantation, and transfer of care. The secondary outcome was death. Results There were 263 patients in the left ventricular assist device program with a median (Q1, Q3) Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score of 16 (8, 28). During a median follow-up 1.2 years, 56 died, 65 underwent transplantation, and 21 had transferred care. There were 640 unplanned hospital readmissions among 250 patients with at least 1 outpatient visit at our center. In a multivariable analysis, Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components but not total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was associated with readmissions. Psychopathology (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-IX) was associated with hemocompatibility (coefficient 0.21 ± standard error 0.11, P = .040) and cardiac (0.15 ± 0.065, P = .02) readmissions. Patient readiness was associated with noncardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-III, 0.24 ± 0.099, P = .016) and cardiac (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant A-low total, 0.037 ± 0.014, P = .007) readmissions. Poor living environment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant B-VIII) was associated with device-related readmissions (0.83 ± 0.34, P = .014). Death was associated with organic psychopathology or neurocognitive impairment (Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant C-X, 0.59 ± 0.21, P = .006). Conclusions Total Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant score was not associated with left ventricular assist device program readmission or mortality. However, we identified certain Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant components that were associated with outcome and could be used to create a left ventricular assist device program specific psychosocial tool.

Objectives This study aims to understand the complex factors affecting heart transplant survival and to determine the importance of possible sex-specific risk factors. Background Heart transplant allocation is primarily focused on preventing waitlist mortality. To prevent organ wastage, future allocation must balance risk of waitlist mortality with post-transplantation mortality. However, more information regarding risk factors after heart transplantation is needed. Methods We included all adults (30,606) in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database who underwent isolated heart transplantation from January 1, 2004, to July 1, 2018. Mortality (8,278 deaths) was verified with the complete Social Security Death Index with a median follow-up of 3.9 years. Temporal decomposition was used to identify phases of survival and phase-specific risk factors. The random survival forests method was used to determine importance of mortality risk factors and their interactions. Results We identified 3 phases of mortality risk: early post-transplantation, constant, and late. Sex was not a significant risk factor. There were several interactions predicting early mortality such as pretransplantation mechanical ventilation with presence of end-organ function (bilirubin, renal function) and interactions predicting later mortality such as diabetes and older age (donor and recipient). More complex interactions predicting early-, mid-, and late-mortality existed and were identified with machine learning (i.e., elevated bilirubin, mechanical ventilation, and dialysis). Conclusions Post-heart transplant mortality risk is complex and dynamic, changing with time and events. Sex is not an important mortality risk factor. To prevent organ wastage, end-organ dysfunction should be resolved before transplantation as much as possible.

BACKGROUND: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a serious complication of pregnancy associated with variable degrees of left ventricular (LV) recovery. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that global LV strain at presentation has prognostic value in patients with PPCM. METHODS: One hundred patients with PPCM aged 30 ± 6 years were enrolled in the multicenter Investigation in Pregnancy Associated Cardiomyopathy study along with 21 normal female control subjects. Speckle-tracking global longitudinal strain (GLS) and global circumferential strain (GCS) analysis was performed. The predefined primary combined outcome variable was death, transplantation, LV assist device implantation, or evidence of persistent LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction [LVEF] < 50%) at 1 year. RESULTS: GLS measurement was feasible in 110 subjects: 89 of 90 patients with PPCM (99%) with echocardiographic data and all 21 control subjects. Of 84 patients (94%) with 1-year follow-up, 21 (25%) had unfavorable primary outcomes: four LV assist device placements, two deaths, and 15 patients with persistent LV dysfunction. GLS at presentation with a cutoff of 10.6% (absolute value) was specifically associated with the subsequent primary outcome with 75% sensitivity and 95% specificity. GCS at presentation with a cutoff of 10.1% was associated with the primary outcome with 78% sensitivity and 84% specificity. GLS and GCS remained significantly associated with outcomes after adjusting for LVEF (GLS odds ratio, 2.07; P < .001; GCS odds ratio, 1.37; P = .005). GLS was significantly additive to LVEF (C statistic = 0.76–0.91, net reclassification improvement = 1.32, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: GLS and GCS in patients with PPCM at presentation were associated with subsequent clinical outcomes, including death, LV assist device implantation, and evidence of persistent LV dysfunction. Strain measures may add prognostic information over LVEF for risk stratification.

Purpose: Caregivers (CGs) provide essential support to older (60-80 years) patients with advanced heart failure (HF), yet caregiving may be burdensome. Understanding the caregivers time spent and difficulty in caring for patients may inform CG support needs before and after cardiac surgery. We compared CG burden before and 24 months after heart transplantation (HT), with or without baseline mechanical circulatory support (MCS), and long-term MCS as destination therapy (DT). Methods: Between 10/1/15-12/31/18, we enrolled 301 CGs of HF patients from 13 U.S. hospitals: 193 awaiting HT (92 with and 101 without MCS), and 108 scheduled for long-term MCS. At baseline (pre-surgery) and 24 months post-surgery, CGs completed the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale (OCBS), which has 15 items with 2 subscales: (1) time: range=1-5, higher score=more time spent on task and (2) difficulty: range=1-5, higher score=higher task difficulty. Statistical analyses included t-tests and baseline-adjusted linear regression models. Results: CGs’ average age was 60.9±10 years, 83% were spouses, 85% female, and 85% white. Across all groups and both time points, time spent on caregiving tasks was moderate and task difficulty was rated low. Time spent on caregiving decreased significantly from baseline to 24-months for all groups (p-value Conclusions: CG time on tasks decreased from baseline to 24-months post-surgery in all groups, and both time and difficulty scores were persistently higher for CGs of DT patients. These results may inform identification of support options to reduce time and difficulty of CG tasks, particularly for those who care for destination therapy HF patients.

Purpose of review Cardiothoracic transplantation is the definitive therapy for end-stage heart and lung disease. In service to this population, disparities in access and care must be simultaneously understood and addressed. Recent findings There are sex, race, geographic, age, and underlying disease disparities in both heart and lung transplantation. Women have reduced waitlist survival but improved posttransplant survival when compared with men for both heart and lung transplantation. Black patients have worse outcome compared with other races postheart transplant. Geographic disparities impact the likelihood of receiving heart or lung transplant and the growing number of patients with advanced age seeking transplant complicates discussions on survival benefit. Finally, underlying disease has affected outcomes for both heart and lung transplant and now are incorporated into the allocation system. Summary Though heart and lung transplantation have several existing disparities, it remains to be seen how advancements in medical technology, changes in donor organ allocation policies, and growing experience in patient selection will impact these concerns.

This thirty-sixth adult lung and heart–lung transplant report summarizes data from 69,200 adult lung and 4,128 adult heart-lung transplants performed through June 30, 2018 and reported to the International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry. With each year's report, we now provide more detailed analyses on a particular focus theme important to patient outcomes. Since 2013, these have been donor and recipient age; retransplantation; early graft failure; indication for transplant; allograft ischemic time; and multiorgan transplantation. Although widely accepted as critical to decision making at the time of receipt of an organ donor offer, there is surprisingly little literature outlining current practice and the impact of size (mis-)matching on outcomes. Hence this year's report focuses on an overall theme of donor and recipient size matching. In addition to reporting donor and recipient height and weight difference for all adult lung and heart-lung transplant recipients stratified by transplant type (bilateral or single) and indication, we report historical trends and associations between size match and survival. The Registry's online slide sets include results from additional analyses and complementary information not included in this publication (see https://ishltregistries.org/registries/slides.asp ).

This in-depth review of sex differences in advanced heart failure therapy summarizes the existing literature on implantable cardioverter defibrillators, biventricular pacemakers, mechanical circulatory support, and transplantation with a focus on utilization, efficacy/clinical effectiveness, adverse events, and controversies. One will learn about the controversies regarding efficacy/clinical effectiveness of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and understand why these devices should be implanted in women even if there are sex differences in appropriate shocks. Individuals will learn about the sex differences with biventricular pacemakers with respect to ventricular remodeling and reduction in heart failure hospitalizations/mortality, as well as, possible mechanisms. We will demonstrate sex differences in heart transplantation and waitlist survival. Despite similar survival for women and men with left ventricular assist devices, there are sex differences in adverse events. These devices do successfully bridge women and men to transplant, yet women are less likely than men to have a left ventricular assist at time of listing and time of transplantation. Finally, one will learn about the concerns regarding poor outcome for men who receive female donor hearts and discover this may not be due to sex, but rather size. More research is needed to better understand sex differences and further improve advanced heart failure therapy for both women and men.

HFrEF is less common in women than men but with several sex differences in the underlying disease. Women with HFrEF are more likely than men to have hypertension and valvular disease, and less likely to have coronary artery disease. In-hospital mortality is similar and low; however, when hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure, the 5-year mortality rate is very high for both men and women. Natriuretic peptide serum levels are higher in women with decompensated heart failure than men but yield similar prognostic risk for in-hospital mortality. The CardioMEMS is used to monitor acute decompensated heart failure events and guide therapy, although their utility in women remains unclear based on information from the CHAMPION trial. There remains no sex-specific guideline therapy for HFrEF because women were underrepresented in clinical trials and studies were never designed to prospectively study sex differences. Based on post hoc analyses or retrospective studies, β-blockers, aldosterone antagonists, ARBs, and ivabradine seem beneficial in women with HFrEF. The combination of hydralazine and isosorbide was studied in black women with HFrEF and found to reduce mortality, reduce hospitalizations, and improve quality of life. More studies are needed and should be prospectively designed to study sex differences to better understand the effects of drugs and technology on women with HFrEF.

Background COVID-19 continues to inflict significant morbidity and mortality, particularly on patients with preexisting health conditions. The clinical course, outcomes, and significance of immunosuppression regimen in heart transplant recipients with COVID-19 remains unclear. Methods We included the first 99 heart transplant recipients at participating centers with COVID-19 and followed patients until resolution. We collected baseline information, symptoms, laboratory studies, vital signs, and outcomes for included patients. The association of immunosuppression regimens at baseline with severe disease were compared using logistic regression , adjusting for age and time since transplant. Results The median age was 60 years, 25% were female, and 44% were white. The median time post-transplant to infection was 5.6 years. Overall, 15% died, 64% required hospital admission, and 7% remained asymptomatic. During the course of illness, only 57% of patients had a fever, and gastrointestinal symptoms were common. Tachypnea , oxygen requirement, elevated creatinine and inflammatory markers were predictive of severe course. Age ≥ 60 was associated with higher risk of death and the use of the combination of calcineurin inhibitor , antimetabolite , and prednisone was associated with more severe disease compared to the combination of calcineurin inhibitor and antimetabolite alone (adjusted OR = 7.3, 95% CI 1.8-36.2). Among hospitalized patients, 30% were treated for secondary infection, acute kidney injury was common and 17% required new renal replacement therapy . Conclusions We present the largest study to date of heart transplant patients with COVID-19 showing common atypical presentations and a high case fatality rate of 24% among hospitalized patients and 16% among symptomatic patients.

Background: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) occurs in ≈1:2000 deliveries in the United States and worldwide. The genetic underpinnings of PPCM remain poorly defined. Approximately 10% of women with PPCM harbor truncating variants in TTN (TTNtvs). Whether mutations in other genes can predispose to PPCM is not known. It is also not known if the presence of TTNtvs predicts clinical presentation or outcomes. Nor is it known if the prevalence of TTNtvs differs in women with PPCM and preeclampsia, the strongest risk factor for PPCM. Methods: Women with PPCM were retrospectively identified from several US and international academic centers, and clinical information and DNA samples were acquired. Next-generation sequencing was performed on 67 genes, including TTN , and evaluated for burden of truncating and missense variants. The impact of TTNtvs on the severity of clinical presentation, and on clinical outcomes, was evaluated. Results: Four hundred sixty-nine women met inclusion criteria. Of the women with PPCM, 10.4% bore TTNtvs (odds ratio=9.4 compared with 1.2% in the reference population; Bonferroni-corrected P [ P *]=1.2×10 –46 ). We additionally identified overrepresentation of truncating variants in FLNC (odds ratio=24.8, P *=7.0×10 –8 ), DSP (odds ratio=14.9, P *=1.0×10 –8 ), and BAG3 (odds ratio=53.1, P *=0.02), genes not previously associated with PPCM. This profile is highly similar to that found in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Women with TTNtvs had lower left ventricular ejection fraction on presentation than did women without TTNtvs (23.5% versus 29%, P =2.5×10 –4 ), but did not differ significantly in timing of presentation after delivery, in prevalence of preeclampsia, or in rates of clinical recovery. Conclusions: This study provides the first extensive genetic and phenotypic landscape of PPCM and demonstrates that predisposition to heart failure is an important risk factor for PPCM. The work reveals a degree of genetic similarity between PPCM and dilated cardiomyopathy, suggesting that gene-specific therapeutic approaches being developed for dilated cardiomyopathy may also apply to PPCM, and that approaches to genetic testing in PPCM should mirror those taken in dilated cardiomyopathy. Last, the clarification of genotype/phenotype associations has important implications for genetic counseling.

BACKGROUND: The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) has been studied to predict right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, but only as a single time point before LVAD implantation. Multiple clinical factors and therapies impact RV function in pre-LVAD patients. Thus, we hypothesized that serial PAPi measurements during cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) optimization before LVAD implantation would provide incremental risk stratification for early RVF after LVAD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients who underwent sequential pulmonary artery catherization with cardiac intensive care optimization before durable LVAD implantation were included. Serial hemodynamics were reviewed retrospectively across the optimization period. The optimal PAPi was defined by the initial PAPi + the PAPi at optimized hemodynamics. RVF was defined as need for a right ventricular assist device or prolonged inotrope use (>14 days postoperatively). Patients with early RVF had significantly lower mean optimal PAPi (3.5 vs 7.5, P < .001) compared with those who did not develop RVF. After adjusting for established risk factors of early RVF after LVAD implantation, the optimal PAPi was independently and incrementally associated with early RVF after LVAD implantation (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.532−0.765, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal PAPi achieved during medical optimization before LVAD implantation provides independent and incremental risk stratification for early RVF, likely identifying dynamic RV reserve.

Tacrolimus is a core component of immunosuppressive regimens. This study compared active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and dissolution kinetics of branded tacrolimus and formulations from three generic manufacturers (Mylan, Dr. Reddy's, Intas) including samples from patients who suffered acute cardiac allograft rejection. Generic samples showed similar API content compared to branded samples with no major impurities. Capsules that underwent uniformity testing had consistent capsule-to-capsule API. Dissolution testing showed similar profiles between branded tacrolimus and Mylan, but notable differences with Dr. Reddy's and Intas. The approximate maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was highest in branded tacrolimus (29 minutes), followed by Mylan (26 minutes), Dr. Reddy's (19 minutes), and Intas (14 minutes) (Student-Newman-Keuls Multiple Comparisons Test; overall ANOVA: p = 0.0199, F = 6.469). This study suggests that the bioavailability of certain generic tacrolimus formulations peak significantly earlier than branded tacrolimus. Further study is needed to determine whether these differences are clinically relevant.

Introduction: Caregivers (CGs) of heart failure (HF) patients (PTs) who undergo heart transplantation (HT) or Destination Therapy Mechanical Circulatory Support (DT MCS) provide support to PTs before and after surgery, which may affect their own health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In SUSTAIN-IT, we previously reported that CG HRQOL was good at baseline (i.e., before HT and DT MCS surgery) and was impacted by CG comorbidities and CG anxiety. This report explores change in CG overall HRQOL, depression, and anxiety from baseline to 12 months after HT or DT MCS surgery. Methods: From 10/1/15-12/31/18, 13 U.S. centers enrolled 301 CGs of HF PTs: 193 awaiting HT (92 HT with MCS as a bridge to transplant [HT BTT] and 101 HT without MCS [HT non-BTT]), and 108 awaiting DT MCS. At baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months post HT or DT MCS surgery, CGs completed the following instruments: EQ-5D-3L (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]: 0 [worst] to 100 [best] imaginable health state), PHQ-8 (range=0-24; score ≥10=depressive symptoms requiring evaluation), and STAI-State (range=20-80, higher score=more anxiety). Analyses included unadjusted and baseline-adjusted linear regression models. Results: CGs were age 61.0±10.3 years; the majority were Caucasian (86%), female (86%), spouses (85%) of enrolled HF PTs. At baseline, CG EQ-5D-3L VAS and PHQ-8 average scores were 83.8 ± 13.99 (high) and 2.6 ± 2.85 (low), respectively, for the entire cohort. No significant interval changes in CG HRQOL and depressive symptoms were found within or between groups. DT MCS and HT non-BTT CG anxiety significantly decreased over time (baseline to 12 months) (Figure). Levels of CG anxiety were similar among all groups at 12 months after HT or DT MCS surgery. Conclusions: The demonstrated reduction in anxiety among CGs in the post-operative period provides clinicians with important information to share with CGs when PTs are considering surgical treatment options for HF.

Purpose: Caregivers (CGs) for patients with advanced heart failure (HF) assist in HF-specific disease management. In the SUSTAIN-IT study, we reported CG perception of difficulty and time needed to perform tasks for patients awaiting surgery in 3 groups: HF patients awaiting heart transplant (HT) without mechanical support (HT-non-MCS), HF patients awaiting HT bridged with mechanical support (HT-MCS), and HF patient awaiting left ventricular device implantation as destination therapy (DT-MCS). In this report, we compare CG perceived burden from baseline to 1 year after surgery. Methods: We enrolled 301 CGs of HF patients between 10/1/15-12/31/18 from 12 U.S. hospitals: 193 awaiting HT (92 with and 101 without MCS), and 108 scheduled for DT-MCS. Prior to surgery and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, CGs completed the Oberst Caregiver Burden Scale (OCBS) which has 15 items with 2 subscales: (1) time and (2) difficulty: range=1-5, higher score=more time required for tasks and more task difficulty. Analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, and baseline-adjusted linear regression models. Results: CGs were age 61.0±10.3 years, the majority were spouses (85%), female (86%), and white (86%). Average time spent on caregiving was moderate and decreased significantly from baseline to 12 months after surgery for all groups (Figure). DT-MCS CGs spent significantly more time than HT CGs on tasks 12 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in perceived difficulty (which was low) in performing CG tasks in all groups from baseline to 12 months. DT-MCS CGs did perceive tasks to be more difficult than HT CGs at 12 months. Conclusion: CGs of advanced HF patients adapted well to assisting with care, without increased burden, 1 year after HT and DT-MCS surgery. CGs of DT-MCS patients required more time and reported CG tasks to be more difficult than HT CGs. Understanding differences in CG burden will aid in pre surgical risk discussions and post-surgical follow-up.

Patients with durable left ventricular assist devices pose special problems for management in the setting of COVID‐19 infection. We describe the successful management of a 44‐year‐old man with severe COVID‐19 infection and HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device. His course was complicated by cytokine storm and COVID‐19‐associated coagulopathy. We describe our institutional protocol for managing COVID‐19 infection in patients on mechanical circulatory support, focusing on the need for a thoughtful, multidisciplinary approach.

Heart transplant allocation in the United States is made on the basis of coarse tiers, defined by mechanical circulatory devices and therapy for advanced heart failure, updated infrequently as a patient's condition deteriorates. Thus, many patients die awaiting heart transplantation. What is needed is a tool that continuously updates risk of mortality as a patient's condition changes to inform clinical decision making.This study sought to develop a decision aid that aggregates adverse events and measures of end-organ function into a continuously updated waitlist mortality estimate.From 2008 to 2013, 414 patients were listed for heart transplantation at Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. The endpoint was waitlist death. Pre-listing patient characteristics and events and laboratory results during listing were analyzed. At each event or measurement change, mortality was recomputed from the resulting model.There were 77 waitlist deaths, with 1- and 4-year survival of 85% and 57%, respectively. When time-varying events and measurements were incorporated into a mortality model, pre-listing patient characteristics became nonsignificant. Neurological events (hazard ratio [HR]: 13.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.63 to 23.8), new requirement for dialysis (HR: 3.67; 95% CI: 1.88 to 7.14), more respiratory complications (HR: 1.79 per episode; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.59), and higher serum bilirubin (p 0.0001) and creatinine (p 0.0001) yielded continuously updated estimates of patient-specific mortality across the waitlist period.Mortality risk for patients with advanced heart failure who are listed for transplantation is related to adverse events and end-organ dysfunction that change over time. A continuously updated mortality estimate, combined with clinical evaluation, may inform status changes that could reduce mortality on the heart transplant waiting list.

Objectives This study sought to determine the accuracy of the pre-transplantation clinical diagnosis of heart disease in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Background Because survival on the heart transplantation waitlist depends on underlying heart disease, a new allocation system will include the type of heart disease. Accuracy of the pre-transplantation clinical diagnosis and the effect of misclassification are unknown. Methods We included all adults who received transplants at our center between January 2009 to December 2015. We compared the pre-transplantation clinical diagnosis at listing with pathology of the explanted heart and determined the potential effect of misclassification with the proposed allocation system. Results A total of 334 patients had the following clinical cardiac diagnoses at listing: 148 had dilated cardiomyopathy, 19 had restrictive cardiomyopathy, 103 had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 24 had hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 11 had valvular disease, 16 had congenital heart disease (CHD), and 13 patients had a diagnosis of “other.” Pathology of the explanted hearts revealed 82% concordance and 18% discordance (10% coding errors and 8% incorrect diagnosis). The most common incorrect diagnoses were sarcoidosis (66%), arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (60%), and other causes of predominately right-sided heart failure (33%). Among the misclassified diagnoses, 40% were listed as UNOS status 2, 8% remained at status 2 at transplantation, and only sarcoidosis and CHD were potentially at a disadvantage with the new allocation. Conclusions There is high concordance between clinical and pathologic diagnosis, except for sarcoidosis and genetic diseases. Few misclassifications result in disadvantages to patients based on the new allocation system, but rare diseases like sarcoidosis remain problematic. To improve the UNOS database and enhance outcome research, pathology of the explanted hearts should be required post-transplantation.

Purpose Factors related to health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of older patients (pts) with advanced heart failure (HF) scheduled for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation as destination therapy (DT) or while a candidate for heart transplantation (HT) with or without an LVAD, may guide therapeutic strategies. We sought to identify pt and caregiver (cg) factors related to HRQOL of pts (60-80 years) awaiting these surgeries. Methods From 10/1/15-12/31/18, we enrolled 302 pts with cgs (n=302) from 13 U.S. sites: 193 pts awaiting HT (92 with and 101 without LVAD) and 109 DT LVAD pts. Pts completed the EQ-5D-3L Visual Analog Scale (VAS): 0-100 (worst-best) health; KCCQ-12 summary score (SS), 0-100=low-high; PHQ-8 (0-24; score > 10=significant depressive symptoms) and STAI-state (20-80; higher score=more anxiety). Cgs completed the EQ-5D, STAI, PHQ-8 and Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale (OCBS): 2 subscales (time and difficulty, 1-5; higher score=more time and more task difficulty). Analyses included multivariable logistic regression models; the binary outcomes were whether individual EQ-5D VAS and KCCQ-12 SSs were higher than the cohort median of 60 and 46, respectively. Results Pts were 66.1±4.5 years, 82% male, and 86% white. Pts reported relatively low generic HRQOL (VAS mean=55.3±23.5) and low HF-specific HRQOL (SS mean=47.5±22.5), both with significant group differences. HT pts with LVADs were more likely to have higher EQ-5D VAS scores; DT pts had the lowest VAS scores (p > 10 was related to lower VAS scores (p > 10 was related to lower KCCQ-12 SSs (p Conclusion Implant strategy, pt depression, and cg time spent on care were significantly related to older advanced HF pt HRQOL. Findings may inform interventions for HF pts awaiting surgery.

Purpose Heart transplantation (HT) and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has improved heart failure (HF) patient (PT) outcomes; it has also led to increased caregiver (CG) responsibility pre and post-surgery. We assessed whether PT and CG factors were related to baseline CG perceived burden in 3 groups of CGs of HF PTs (60-80 years): (1) PT supported with MCS as a bridge to HT (HT BTT), (2) PT awaiting HT without MCS (HT non BTT), and (3) PT prior to MCS for destination therapy (DT MCS). Methods Between 10/1/15-12/31/18, we enrolled 302 CGs from 13 U.S. sites: 92 HT BTT, 101 HT non BTT, and 109 DT MCS. CG burden was measured with the Oberst Caregiving Burden Scale (OCBS: [1] time: higher score=more time spent on task and [2] difficulty: higher score=more difficulty of task). CGs also completed the EQ-5D-3L (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]: 0 [worst] to 100 [best] imaginable health state and 5 dimensions); STAI-State (higher score=more anxiety); PHQ-8 (score ≥10=significant depressive symptoms), and demographic/health history/impact of caregiving on own health questions. PTs completed the KCCQ-12, MoCA (measure of cognitive dysfunction) and all above measures except the OCBS. Analyses included multivariable logistic regression models in which the binary outcomes were whether individual OCBS difficulty and time scores were higher than the cohort median values of 1.20 and 2.26, respectively. Results CGs were 61.1±9.7 years, 85% spouses, 85% female, and 85% white. Overall CG difficulty was low and CG time spent was moderate. CGs who reported more difficulty on tasks perceived more impact on their own health and had more anxiety, with no differences by PT implant strategy (table). CGs with Conclusion Only CG factors, and not PT factors, were related to CG perceived burden. Understanding factors that affect CG burden may aid in preoperative advanced therapies discussions.