1. Tumor mutational burden assessment and standardized bioinformatics approach using custom NGS panels in clinical routine
- Author
-
Célia Dupain, Tom Gutman, Elodie Girard, Choumouss Kamoun, Grégoire Marret, Zahra Castel-Ajgal, Marie-Paule Sablin, Cindy Neuzillet, Edith Borcoman, Ségolène Hescot, Céline Callens, Olfa Trabelsi-Grati, Samia Melaabi, Roseline Vibert, Samantha Antonio, Coralie Franck, Michèle Galut, Isabelle Guillou, Maral Halladjian, Yves Allory, Joanna Cyrta, Julien Romejon, Eleonore Frouin, Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet, Jennifer Wong, Christophe Le Tourneau, Ivan Bièche, Nicolas Servant, Maud Kamal, and Julien Masliah-Planchon
- Subjects
Tumor mutational burden ,Calculation ,Immunotherapy ,Precision medicine ,Molecular Tumor Board ,Biology (General) ,QH301-705.5 - Abstract
Abstract Background High tumor mutational burden (TMB) was reported to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1, received FDA-approval for the treatment of unresectable/metastatic tumors with high TMB as determined by the FoundationOne®CDx test. It remains to be determined how TMB can also be calculated using other tests. Results FFPE/frozen tumor samples from various origins were sequenced in the frame of the Institut Curie (IC) Molecular Tumor Board using an in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. A TMB calculation method was developed at IC (IC algorithm) and compared to the FoundationOne® (FO) algorithm. Using IC algorithm, an optimal 10% variant allele frequency (VAF) cut-off was established for TMB evaluation on FFPE samples, compared to 5% on frozen samples. The median TMB score for MSS/POLE WT tumors was 8.8 mut/Mb versus 45 mut/Mb for MSI/POLE-mutated tumors. When focusing on MSS/POLE WT tumor samples, the highest median TMB scores were observed in lymphoma, lung, endometrial, and cervical cancers. After biological manual curation of these cases, 21% of them could be reclassified as MSI/POLE tumors and considered as “true TMB high.” Higher TMB values were obtained using FO algorithm on FFPE samples compared to IC algorithm (40 mut/Mb [10–3927] versus 8.2 mut/Mb [2.5–897], p
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF