Search

Aims To determine the bleeding risk in patients taking anticoagulants (AC) and antiplatelets (AP) before onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) injections and improve peri-operative decision making and counseling. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients having intravesical BoNT-A in three teaching hospitals from January 2016 to July 2018. Demographic data, indication for intravesical BoNT-A injection, and side-effects of significant bleeding requiring intervention were recorded. Results Five hundred and thirty-two patients had intravesical BoNT-A injections during this time. Sixty-three patients of mean age 69 years (range 19-89) had a total of 114 separate rounds of BoNT-A injections whilst on treatment dose AC/AP therapy. Of the 63, there were 33 males, with 46 having idiopatic detrusor overactivity and 17 with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Each patient had between 1 and 7 repeat injections during the studied period. AC/AP use across the 114 episodes included; aspirin 44, clopidogrel 37, warfarin 19, and NOAC (novel/non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant) 14. Patients on warfarin who had point of care testing all had international normalized ratio less than 3. BoNT-A dose varied from 100U to 300U-modal dosage was 200U.1/114(0.88%) injection episodes resulted in postinjection hematuria requiring overnight admission. This resolved spontaneously, with an overnight catheter. This patient was on rivaroxaban and had 300U of BoNT-A injected through 20 sites, on a background of previous prostate radiotherapy and self-catheterization. Conclusions Continuation of AP/AC therapy during intravesical BoNT-A injection treatment appears to be safe-with a 0.88% rate of spontaneously resolving hematuria.

Objectives To determine the safety of urological admissions and procedures during the height of the COVID‐19 pandemic using “hot” and “cold” sites. The secondary objective is to determine risk factors of contracting COVID‐19 within our cohort. Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients admitted from March 1 to May 31, 2020 at a high‐volume tertiary urology department in London, United Kingdom. Elective surgery was carried out at a “cold” site requiring a negative COVID‐19 swab 72‐hours prior to admission and patients were required to self‐isolate for 14‐days preoperatively, while all acute admissions were admitted to the “hot” site. Complications related to COVID‐19 were presented as percentages. Risk factors for developing COVID‐19 infection were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 611 patients, 451 (73.8%) male and 160 (26.2%) female, with a median age of 57 (interquartile range 44‐70) were admitted under the urology team; 101 (16.5%) on the “cold” site and 510 (83.5%) on the “hot” site. Procedures were performed in 495 patients of which eight (1.6%) contracted COVID‐19 postoperatively with one (0.2%) postoperative mortality due to COVID‐19. Overall, COVID‐19 was detected in 20 (3.3%) patients with two (0.3%) deaths. Length of stay was associated with contracting COVID‐19 in our cohort (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13‐1.39). Conclusions Continuation of urological procedures using “hot” and “cold” sites throughout the COVID‐19 pandemic was safe practice, although the risk of COVID‐19 remained and is underlined by a postoperative mortality.

BackgroundContracting COVID-19 peri-operatively has been associated with a mortality rate as high as 23%, making prevention vital.ObjectivesThe primary objective is to determine safety of surgical admissions and procedures during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic using ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ sites. The secondary objective is to determine risk factors of contracting COVID-19.Design, Setting and ParticipantsA retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients admitted from 1st March – 31st May 2020 at a high-volume tertiary urology department in London, United Kingdom. Elective surgery was carried out at a ‘cold’ site requiring a negative COVID-19 swab 72 hours prior to admission and to self-isolate for 14 days pre-operatively, whilst all acute admissions were admitted to the ‘hot’ site.Outcome Measurements and Statistical AnalysisComplications related to COVID-19 were presented as percentages. Risk factors for developing COVID-19 infection were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results and LimitationsA total of 611 patients, 451 (73.8%) male and 160 (26.2%) female, with a median age of 57 (interquartile range 44-70) were admitted under the urology team; 101 (16.5%) on the ‘cold’ site and 510 (83.5%) on the ‘hot’ site. Procedures were performed in 495 patients of which 8 (1.6%) contracted COVID-19 post-operatively with 1 (0.2%) post-operative mortality due to COVID-19. Overall, COVID-19 was detected in 20 (3.3%) patients with 2 (0.3%) deaths. Length of stay was associated with contracting COVID-19 in our cohort (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.39). Limitations include possible under reporting due to post-operative patients presenting elsewhere.ConclusionsContinuation of surgical procedures using ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ sites throughout the COVID-19 pandemic was safe practice, although the risk of COVID-19 remained and is underlined by a post-operative mortality.Patient SummaryUsing ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ sites has allowed the safe continuation of urological practice throughout the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:Intravesical OnabotulinumToxin-A(Botox) injections are an established treatment for idiopathic and neurogenic detrusor overactivity (IDO and NDO). The patient population...