Search

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) occurs after exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). For persons who are exposed, the standard of care is observation and quarantine. Whether hydroxychloroquine can prevent symptomatic infection after SARS-CoV-2 exposure is unknown. Methods We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial across the United States and parts of Canada testing hydroxychloroquine as postexposure prophylaxis. We enrolled adults who had household or occupational exposure to someone with confirmed Covid-19 at a distance of less than 6 ft for more than 10 minutes while wearing neither a face mask nor an eye shield (high-risk exposure) or while wearing a face mask but no eye shield (moderate-risk exposure). Within 4 days after exposure, we randomly assigned participants to receive either placebo or hydroxychloroquine (800 mg once, followed by 600 mg in 6 to 8 hours, then 600 mg daily for 4 additional days). The primary outcome was the incidence of either laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 or illness compatible with Covid-19 within 14 days. Results We enrolled 821 asymptomatic participants. Overall, 87.6% of the participants (719 of 821) reported a high-risk exposure to a confirmed Covid-19 contact. The incidence of new illness compatible with Covid-19 did not differ significantly between participants receiving hydroxychloroquine (49 of 414 [11.8%]) and those receiving placebo (58 of 407 [14.3%]); the absolute difference was −2.4 percentage points (95% confidence interval, −7.0 to 2.2; P=0.35). Side effects were more common with hydroxychloroquine than with placebo (40.1% vs. 16.8%), but no serious adverse reactions were reported. Conclusions After high-risk or moderate-risk exposure to Covid-19, hydroxychloroquine did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or confirmed infection when used as postexposure prophylaxis within 4 days after exposure. (Funded by David Baszucki and Jan Ellison Baszucki and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04308668.)

Scopo del nostro lavoro è stato descrivere ed inquadrare gli aspetti psico-comportamentali e la qualità di vita della narcolessia in età evolutiva. Metodi: Abbiamo pertanto disegnato uno studio caso-controllo comprendente 30 pazienti narcolettici, 39 epilettici, e 39 controlli sani, appaiati per sesso e età. Risultati: La nostra popolazione di bambini e adolescenti affetti da narcolessia mostra un aumento delle problematiche internalizzanti. I due gruppi patologici hanno in comune punteggi più elevati rispetto ai controlli per i disturbi d’ansia, le difficoltà attentive e di socializzazione, i disturbi oppositivo-provocatori. Ciò che distingue, invece, i pazienti narcolettici, sono gli aspetti di ritiro e depressione, la tendenza alla somatizzazione, i problemi del pensiero ed i disturbi affettivi. Fattori di rischio psicopatologici per i giovani narcolettici sono risultati essere l’esordio precoce, il ritardo diagnostico, il sonno notturno disturbato, la minor latenza di sonno all’addormentamento, un maggior numero di SOREMP all’MSLT. Dall’altro lato la terapia farmacologica, un maggior numero di sonnellini spontanei e la durata di malattia, sembrano influenzare positivamente l’evoluzione comportamentale. La salute psicosociale dei giovani narcolettici, inoltre, risulta essere peggiore rispetto ai controlli sani, mentre la salute fisica non mostra differenze. I problemi internalizzanti influenzano negativamente tutti gli ambiti della salute di questi ragazzi, mentre la durata di malattia sembra migliorare il funzionamento scolastico. Conclusioni: Il nostro lavoro conferma che i giovani narcolettici presentano un maggior rischio psicopatologico sia rispetto ai controlli sani sia rispetto un’altra patologia neurologica cronica. Se da un lato alcuni aspetti comportamentali possono essere giustificati come una reazione adattativa verso una patologia neurologica invalidante, dall’altro un quadro distimico caratterizzato da ritiro e lamentele somatiche, sembra essere tipico dei bambini ed adolescenti narcolettici., The purpose of our study was to describe the behavioral aspects and quality of life of childhood narcolepsy. Methods: We performed a case-control study in 30 narcolepsy patients, 39 epilepsy patients, and 39 healthy controls matched for sex and age. Results: Our population of children and adolescents with narcolepsy show an increase in internalizing problems. The two groups have in common higher scores than controls for anxiety disorders, attention, social and oppositional-defiant problems. Tipical of the narcolepsy patients, are withdrawal and depression symptoms, somatic complaints, thought problems and affective disorders. Psychopathological risk factors for were found to be the early onset, the diagnostic delay, nocturnal sleep disturbed, the shorter latency of sleep asleep, a greater number of SOREMP all'MSLT. On the other hand, the pharmacological therapy, spontaneous naps and duration of disease, appear to positively influence the behavioral evolution. The psychosocial health of pediatric narcolepsy also turns out to be worse than in healthy controls, while the physical health shows no differences. The internalizing problems adversely affect all areas of the health of these children, while the duration of disease seems to improve the functioning of the school. Conclusions: Our work confirms that pediatric narcolepsy have an increased psychopathology risk. While some aspects of behavior can be justified as an adaptive reaction to a neurological disorder, a dysthymic framework characterized by withdrawal and somatic complaints, seems to be typical of children and adolescents with narcolepsy.

Scopo del nostro lavoro è stato descrivere ed inquadrare gli aspetti psico-comportamentali e la qualità di vita della narcolessia in età evolutiva. Metodi: Abbiamo pertanto disegnato uno studio caso-controllo comprendente 30 pazienti narcolettici, 39 epilettici, e 39 controlli sani, appaiati per sesso e età. Risultati: La nostra popolazione di bambini e adolescenti affetti da narcolessia mostra un aumento delle problematiche internalizzanti. I due gruppi patologici hanno in comune punteggi più elevati rispetto ai controlli per i disturbi d’ansia, le difficoltà attentive e di socializzazione, i disturbi oppositivo-provocatori. Ciò che distingue, invece, i pazienti narcolettici, sono gli aspetti di ritiro e depressione, la tendenza alla somatizzazione, i problemi del pensiero ed i disturbi affettivi. Fattori di rischio psicopatologici per i giovani narcolettici sono risultati essere l’esordio precoce, il ritardo diagnostico, il sonno notturno disturbato, la minor latenza di sonno all’addormentamento, un maggior numero di SOREMP all’MSLT. Dall’altro lato la terapia farmacologica, un maggior numero di sonnellini spontanei e la durata di malattia, sembrano influenzare positivamente l’evoluzione comportamentale. La salute psicosociale dei giovani narcolettici, inoltre, risulta essere peggiore rispetto ai controlli sani, mentre la salute fisica non mostra differenze. I problemi internalizzanti influenzano negativamente tutti gli ambiti della salute di questi ragazzi, mentre la durata di malattia sembra migliorare il funzionamento scolastico. Conclusioni: Il nostro lavoro conferma che i giovani narcolettici presentano un maggior rischio psicopatologico sia rispetto ai controlli sani sia rispetto un’altra patologia neurologica cronica. Se da un lato alcuni aspetti comportamentali possono essere giustificati come una reazione adattativa verso una patologia neurologica invalidante, dall’altro un quadro distimico caratterizzato da ritiro e lamentele somatiche, sembra essere tipico dei bambini ed adolescenti narcolettici., The purpose of our study was to describe the behavioral aspects and quality of life of childhood narcolepsy. Methods: We performed a case-control study in 30 narcolepsy patients, 39 epilepsy patients, and 39 healthy controls matched for sex and age. Results: Our population of children and adolescents with narcolepsy show an increase in internalizing problems. The two groups have in common higher scores than controls for anxiety disorders, attention, social and oppositional-defiant problems. Tipical of the narcolepsy patients, are withdrawal and depression symptoms, somatic complaints, thought problems and affective disorders. Psychopathological risk factors for were found to be the early onset, the diagnostic delay, nocturnal sleep disturbed, the shorter latency of sleep asleep, a greater number of SOREMP all'MSLT. On the other hand, the pharmacological therapy, spontaneous naps and duration of disease, appear to positively influence the behavioral evolution. The psychosocial health of pediatric narcolepsy also turns out to be worse than in healthy controls, while the physical health shows no differences. The internalizing problems adversely affect all areas of the health of these children, while the duration of disease seems to improve the functioning of the school. Conclusions: Our work confirms that pediatric narcolepsy have an increased psychopathology risk. While some aspects of behavior can be justified as an adaptive reaction to a neurological disorder, a dysthymic framework characterized by withdrawal and somatic complaints, seems to be typical of children and adolescents with narcolepsy.

Study objectives To investigate behavioral aspects and quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 narcolepsy (NT1). Methods We performed a case-control study comparing 29 patients with NT1 versus sex- and age-matched patients with idiopathic epilepsy (n = 39) and healthy controls (n = 39). Behavior and quality of life were evaluated by self-administered questionnaires (Child Behavior Checklist, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory). Patient groups were contrasted and scale results were correlated with clinical and polysomnographic parameters, and cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin-1 levels. Results Young patients with NT1 showed increased internalizing problems associated with aggressive behavior. Emotional profile in patients with NT1 positively correlated with age at onset, diagnostic delay, and subjective sleepiness, whereas treatment and disease duration were associated with fewer behavioral problems (attention problems, aggressive behavior, and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder). Psychosocial health domains of pediatric NT1 were worse than in healthy controls, whereas the physical health domains were comparable. Conclusions Young NT1 patients show a discrete pattern of altered behavioral, thought, and mood profile in comparison with healthy controls and with idiopathic epilepsy patients thus suggesting a direct link with sleepiness. Further studies investigating behavior in patients with idiopathic hypersomnia or type 2 narcolepsy are needed to disentangle the role of REM sleep dysfunction and hypocretin deficiency in psychiatric disorders. Symptoms of withdrawal, depression, somatic complaints, thought problems, and aggressiveness were common, NT1 children perceived lower school competencies than healthy children, and their parents also reported worse psychosocial health. Our data suggest that early effective treatment and disease self-awareness should be promoted in NT1 children for their positive effect on behavior and psychosocial health.