1. Goal-Focused Emotion-Regulation Therapy (GET) in Young Adult Testicular Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Pilot Study
- Author
-
Hoyt, Michael A, Wang, Ashley Wei-Ting, Ceja, Raymond Carrillo, Cheavens, Jennifer S, Daneshvar, Michael A, Feldman, Darren R, Funt, Samuel A, and Nelson, Christian J
- Subjects
Clinical and Health Psychology ,Health Services and Systems ,Nursing ,Health Sciences ,Psychology ,Cancer ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Depression ,Behavioral and Social Science ,Women's Health ,Mind and Body ,Urologic Diseases ,Pediatric ,Mental Health ,Clinical Research ,Rare Diseases ,Health Disparities ,Brain Disorders ,Mental Illness ,Rehabilitation ,6.6 Psychological and behavioural ,Male ,Humans ,Young Adult ,Testicular Neoplasms ,Pilot Projects ,Emotional Regulation ,Goals ,Survivors ,Testicular cancer ,Emotion regulation ,Young adults ,Psycho-oncology ,Survivorship ,Biobehavioral ,Medical and Health Sciences ,Education ,Psychology and Cognitive Sciences ,Public Health ,Health sciences - Abstract
BackgroundYoung adult testicular cancer survivors experience adverse impacts after treatment. We developed Goal-focused Emotion-regulation Therapy (GET) to improve distress symptoms, emotion regulation, and goal navigation skills.PurposeThis pilot study examined GET versus an active control intervention in young adult survivors of testicular cancer.MethodsSeventy-five eligible survivors treated with chemotherapy were randomized to receive GET or Individual Supportive Listening (ISL). Study acceptability, engagement, and tolerability were examined, and intervention fidelity and therapeutic alliance were compared between arms. Preliminary efficacy was evaluated by effect sizes for between-group changes in primary (anxiety and depressive symptoms) and secondary (career confusion, goal navigation, and emotion regulation) outcomes from baseline to immediately and 3-month post-intervention.ResultsAmong the 38 men randomized to GET, 81.1% completed all study sessions compared with 82.4% of the 37 men assigned to ISL. Fidelity to the intervention was 87% in GET. Therapeutic alliance wassignificantly higher among those receiving GET versus ISL. Participants exhibited a medium group-by-time effect size with greater reductions in depressive (d = 0.45) and anxiety (d = 0.29) symptoms for those in GET versus ISL, with a similar pattern at 3 months for depressive (d = 0.46) and anxiety (d = 0.46) symptoms.ConclusionsGET is a feasible and acceptable intervention for reducing adverse outcomes after testicular cancer for young adults. Observed effect sizes preliminarily suggest meaningful change, though should be interpreted with caution in small samples. GET may be a developmentally-matched behavioral approach to improve psychosocial function in this cancer group.Clinical trial informationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04150848. Registered on October 28, 2019.
- Published
- 2023