Search

DNA looping is important for genome organization in all domains of life. The basis of DNA loop formation is the bridging of two separate DNA double helices. Detecting DNA bridge formation generally involves the use of complex single-molecule techniques (atomic force microscopy, magnetic, or optical tweezers). Although DNA bridging can be qualitatively described, quantification of DNA bridging and bridging dynamics using these techniques is challenging. Here, we describe a novel biochemical assay capable of not only detecting DNA bridge formation, but also allowing for quantification of DNA bridging efficiency and the effects of physico-chemical conditions on DNA bridge formation.

Three new trans-ruthenium(ii) complexes coordinated to tetrapyridyl ligands, namely [Ru(bapbpy)(dmso)Cl]Cl ([2]Cl), [Ru(bapbpy)(Hmte)2](PF6)2 ([3](PF6)2), and [Ru(biqbpy)(Hmte)2](PF6)2 ([4](PF6)2), were prepared as analogues of [Ru(biqbpy)(dmso)Cl]Cl ([1]Cl), a recently described photoactivated chemotherapy agent. The new complexes were characterized, and their crystal structures showed the distorted coordination octahedron typical of this family of complexes. Their photoreactivity in solution was analyzed by spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry, which showed that the sulfur ligand was substituted upon blue light irradiation. The binding of the ruthenium complexes to a reference single-stranded oligonucleotide (s(5'CTACGGTTTCAC3')) was explored both in the dark and under light irradiation by gel electrophoresis and high-resolution mass spectrometry. While adduct formation in the dark was negligible for the four complexes, light irradiation led to the formation of adducts with one or two ruthenium centers per oligonucleotide. The absence of interactions in the dark and the presence of complex-oligonucleotide adducts demonstrate that visible light controls the interaction of these ruthenium complexes with nucleic acids.

α-Galactosidases (EC 3.2.1.22) are retaining glycosidases that cleave terminal α-linked galactose residues from glycoconjugate substrates. α-Galactosidases take part in the turnover of cell wall–associated galactomannans in plants and in the lysosomal degradation of glycosphingolipids in animals. Deficiency of human α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) causes Fabry disease (FD), a heritable, X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, characterized by accumulation of globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3). Current management of FD involves enzyme-replacement therapy (ERT). An activity-based probe (ABP) covalently labeling the catalytic nucleophile of α-Gal A has been previously designed to study α-galactosidases for use in FD therapy. Here, we report that this ABP labels proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana leaf extracts, enabling the identification and biochemical characterization of an N. benthamiana α-galactosidase we name here A1.1 (gene accession ID GJZM-1660). The transiently overexpressed and purified enzyme was a monomer lacking N-glycans and was active toward 4-methylumbelliferyl-α-d-galactopyranoside substrate (K(m) = 0.17 mm) over a broad pH range. A1.1 structural analysis by X-ray crystallography revealed marked similarities with human α-Gal A, even including A1.1's ability to hydrolyze Gb3 and lyso-Gb3, which are not endogenous in plants. Of note, A1.1 uptake into FD fibroblasts reduced the elevated lyso-Gb3 levels in these cells, consistent with A1.1 delivery to lysosomes as revealed by confocal microscopy. The ease of production and the features of A1.1, such as stability over a broad pH range, combined with its capacity to degrade glycosphingolipid substrates, warrant further examination of its value as a potential therapeutic agent for ERT-based FD management.

Plants adapt to fluctuating light conditions by a process called non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), where membrane protein PsbS plays a crucial role and transforms a change in the pH-gradient across the thylakoid membrane under excess light conditions into a photoprotective state, leading to de-excitation of antenna chlorophylls. The PsbS activation mechanism is elusive and has been proposed to involve a monomerization step and protonation of specific residues. To elucidate its function, it is essential to produce PsbS in large quantities, stabilize PsbS in a membrane-mimicking environment and analyze its pH-dependent conformational structure. We present an approach for large-scale in-vitro production and spectroscopic characterization of PsbS under controlled, non-crystalline conditions. We produced PsbS of the moss Physcomitrella patens in milligram quantities in E. coli, refolded PsbS in several detergent types and analyzed its conformation at neutral and low pH by Dynamic Light Scattering and NMR spectroscopy. Our results reveal that at both pH conditions, PsbS exist as dimers or in apparent monomer-dimer equilibria. Lowering of the pH induces conformational changes, destabilizes the dimer state and shifts the equilibria towards the monomeric form. In vivo, a similar response upon thylakoid lumen acidification may tune PsbS activity in a gradual manner.

Bacteria frequently need to adapt to altered environmental conditions. Adaptation requires changes in gene expression, often mediated by global regulators of transcription. The nucleoid-associated protein H-NS is a key global regulator in Gram-negative bacteria and is believed to be a crucial player in bacterial chromatin organization via its DNA-bridging activity. H-NS activity in vivo is modulated by physico-chemical factors (osmolarity, pH, temperature) and interaction partners. Mechanistically, it is unclear how functional modulation of H-NS by such factors is achieved. Here, we show that a diverse spectrum of H-NS modulators alter the DNA-bridging activity of H-NS. Changes in monovalent and divalent ion concentrations drive an abrupt switch between a bridging and non-bridging DNA-binding mode. Similarly, synergistic and antagonistic co-regulators modulate the DNA-bridging efficiency. Structural studies suggest a conserved mechanism: H-NS switches between a ‘closed’ and an ‘open’, bridging competent, conformation driven by environmental cues and interaction partners., eLife digest The genetic information every cell needs to work properly is encoded in molecules of DNA that are much longer than the cell itself. A key challenge in biology is to understand how DNA is organized to fit inside each cell, whilst still providing access to the information that it contains. Since the way DNA is organized can influence which genes are active, rearranging DNA plays an important role in controlling how cells behave. In Escherichia coli and many other bacteria, a protein called H-NS contributes to DNA reorganization by forming or rupturing loops in the DNA in response to changes in temperature, the levels of salt and other aspects of the cell’s surroundings. In controlling loop formation, it dictates whether specific genes are switched on or off. However, it remains unclear how H-NS detects the environmental changes. To address this question, van der Valk et al. used biochemical techniques to study the activity of H-NS from E. coli under different environmental conditions. The experiments show that changes in the environment cause structural changes to H-NS, altering its ability to form DNA loops. A previously unnoticed region of the protein acts as a switch to control these structural changes, and ultimately affects which genes are active in the cell. These findings shed new light on how bacteria organize their DNA and the strategies they have developed to adapt to different environments. The new protein region identified in H-NS may also be present in similar proteins found in other organisms. In the future, this knowledge may ultimately help to develop new antibiotic drugs that target H-NS proteins in bacteria.

The helical structure of double-stranded DNA is destabilized by increasing temperature. Above a critical temperature (the melting temperature), the two strands in duplex DNA become fully separated. Below this temperature, the structural effects are localized. Using tethered particle motion in a temperature-controlled sample chamber, we systematically investigated the effect of increasing temperature on DNA structure and the interplay between this effect and protein binding. Our measurements revealed that (1) increasing temperature enhances DNA flexibility, effectively leading to more compact folding of the double-stranded DNA chain, and (2) temperature differentially affects different types of DNA-bending chromatin proteins from mesophilic and thermophilic organisms. Thus, our findings aid in understanding genome organization in organisms thriving at moderate as well as extreme temperatures. Moreover, our results underscore the importance of carefully controlling and measuring temperature in single-molecule DNA (micromanipulation) experiments.

Bacteria frequently need to adapt to altered environmental conditions. Adaptation requires changes in gene expression, often mediated by global regulators of transcription. The nucleoid-associated protein H-NS is a key global regulator inGram-negative bacteria, and is believed to be a crucial player in bacterial chromatin organization via its DNA bridging activity. H-NS activityin vivois modulated by physico-chemical factors (osmolarity, pH, temperature) and interaction partners. Mechanistically it is unclear how functional modulation of H-NS by such factors is achieved. Here, we show that a diverse spectrum of H-NS modulators alter the ability of H-NS to bridge DNA. Changes in monovalent and divalent ion concentrations drive an abrupt switch between a bridging and non-bridging DNA binding mode. Similarly, synergistic and antagonistic co-regulators modulate the DNA bridging efficiency. Structural studies suggest a conserved mechanism: H-NS switches between a “closed” and an “open”, bridging competent, conformation driven by environmental cues and interaction partners.

Repairing damaged DNA is essential for an organism’s survival. UV damage endonuclease (UVDE) is a DNA-repair enzyme that can recognize and incise different types of damaged DNA. We present the structure of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius UVDE on its own and in a pre-catalytic complex with UV-damaged DNA containing a 6-4 photoproduct showing a novel ‘dual dinucleotide flip’ mechanism for recognition of damaged dipyrimidines: the two purines opposite to the damaged pyrimidine bases are flipped into a dipurine-specific pocket, while the damaged bases are also flipped into another cleft.

Sso10a proteins are small DNA-binding proteins expressed by the crenarchaeal model organism Sulfolobus solfataricus. Based on the structure of Sso10a1, which contains a winged helix-turn-helix motif, it is believed that Sso10a proteins function as sequence-specific transcription factors. Here we show that Sso10a1 and Sso10a2 exhibit different distinct DNA-binding modes. While the ability to bend DNA is shared between the two proteins, DNA bridging is observed only for Sso10a1 and only Sso10a2 exhibits filament formation along DNA. The architectural properties of Sso10a proteins suggest that these proteins fulfil generic roles in chromatin organization and compaction. As these proteins exhibit different binding behaviour depending on their DNA binding stoichiometry, altered levels of expression in the cell can be exploited to drive changes in local genome folding, which may operate to modulate transcription.

Dormancy is a state of growth cessation that allows bacteria to escape the host defense system and antibiotic challenge. Understanding the mechanisms that control dormancy is of key importance for the treatment of latent infections, such as those from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In mycobacteria, dormancy is controlled by the response regulator DevR, which responds to conditions of hypoxia. Here, we show that OsdR of Streptomyces coelicolor recognizes the same regulatory element and controls a regulon that consists of genes involved in the control of stress and development. Only the core regulon in the direct vicinity of dosR and osdR is conserved between M. tuberculosis and S. coelicolor, respectively. Thus, we show how the system has diverged from allowing escape from the host defense system by mycobacteria to the control of sporulation by complex multicellular streptomycetes. This provides novel insights into how bacterial growth and development are coordinated with the environmental conditions., Two-component regulatory systems allow bacteria to respond adequately to changes in their environment. In response to a given stimulus, a sensory kinase activates its cognate response regulator via reversible phosphorylation. The response regulator DevR activates a state of dormancy under hypoxia in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, allowing this pathogen to escape the host defense system. Here, we show that OsdR (SCO0204) of the soil bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor is a functional orthologue of DevR. OsdR, when activated by the sensory kinase OsdK (SCO0203), binds upstream of the DevR-controlled dormancy genes devR, hspX, and Rv3134c of M. tuberculosis. In silico analysis of the S. coelicolor genome combined with in vitro DNA binding studies identified many binding sites in the genomic region around osdR itself and upstream of stress-related genes. This binding correlated well with transcriptomic responses, with deregulation of developmental genes and genes related to stress and hypoxia in the osdR mutant. A peak in osdR transcription in the wild-type strain at the onset of aerial growth correlated with major changes in global gene expression. Taken together, our data reveal the existence of a dormancy-related regulon in streptomycetes which plays an important role in the transcriptional control of stress- and development-related genes. IMPORTANCE Dormancy is a state of growth cessation that allows bacteria to escape the host defense system and antibiotic challenge. Understanding the mechanisms that control dormancy is of key importance for the treatment of latent infections, such as those from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In mycobacteria, dormancy is controlled by the response regulator DevR, which responds to conditions of hypoxia. Here, we show that OsdR of Streptomyces coelicolor recognizes the same regulatory element and controls a regulon that consists of genes involved in the control of stress and development. Only the core regulon in the direct vicinity of dosR and osdR is conserved between M. tuberculosis and S. coelicolor, respectively. Thus, we show how the system has diverged from allowing escape from the host defense system by mycobacteria to the control of sporulation by complex multicellular streptomycetes. This provides novel insights into how bacterial growth and development are coordinated with the environmental conditions.

The UvrA protein is the initial DNA damage-sensing protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and detects a wide variety of structurally unrelated lesions. After initial recognition of DNA damage, UvrA loads the UvrB protein onto the DNA. This protein then verifies the presence of a lesion, after which UvrA is released from the DNA. UvrA contains two ATPase domains, both belonging to the ABC ATPase superfamily. We have determined the activities of two mutants, in which a single domain was deactivated. Inactivation of either one ATPase domain in Escherichia coli UvrA results in a complete loss of ATPase activity, indicating that both domains function in a cooperative way. We could show that this ATPase activity is not required for the recognition of bulky lesions by UvrA, but it does promote the specific binding to the less distorting cyclobutane-pyrimidine dimer (CPD). The two ATPase mutants also show a difference in UvrB-loading, depending on the length of the DNA substrate. The ATPase domain I mutant was capable of loading UvrB on a lesion in a 50 bp fragment, but this loading was reduced on a longer substrate. For the ATPase domain II mutant the opposite was found: UvrB could not be loaded on a 50 bp substrate, but this loading was rescued when the length of the fragment was increased. This differential loading of UvrB by the two ATPase mutants could be related to different interactions between the UvrA and UvrB subunits.

UV damage endonuclease (UVDE) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe initiates repair of UV lesions and abasic sites by nicking the DNA 5' to the damaged site. In this paper we show that in addition UVDE incises DNA containing a single-strand nick or gap, but that the enzymatic activity on these substrates as well as on abasic sites strongly depends on the presence of a neighbouring pyrimidine residue. This indicates that, although UVDE may have been derived from an ancestral AP endonuclease its major substrate is a UV lesion and not an AP site. We propose that UVDE rotates two nucleotides into a pocket of the protein in order to bring the scissile bond close to the active site and that purine bases are excluded from this pocket. We also show that in the DNA complex residue Tyr-358 of UVDE penetrates the DNA helix causing unstacking of two residues opposite the lesion, thereby stabilizing the protein-DNA interaction, most likely by promoting bending of the DNA. In the absence of Tyr-358 the enzyme exhibits an increased catalytic activity on UV-induced lesions, but only at a lower pH of 6.5. At physiological conditions (pH 7.5) the mutant protein completely looses its catalytic activity although it can still bind to the DNA. We propose that in addition to stabilizing the bend in the DNA the hydrophobic side chain of Tyr-358 shields the active site from exposure to the solvent.

Helicases play critical roles in all aspects of nucleic acid metabolism by catalyzing the remodeling of DNA and RNA structures. UvrD is an abundant helicase in Escherichia coli with well characterized functions in mismatch and nucleotide excision repair and a possible role in displacement of proteins such as RecA from single-stranded DNA. The mismatch repair protein MutL is known to stimulate UvrD. Here we show that the nucleotide excision repair proteins UvrA and UvrB can together stimulate UvrD-catalyzed unwinding of a range of DNA substrates containing strand discontinuities, including forked DNA substrates. The stimulation is specific for UvrD, as UvrAB failed to stimulate Rep helicase, a UvrD homologue. Moreover, although UvrAB can promote limited strand displacement, stimulation of UvrD did not require the strand displacement function of UvrAB. We conclude that UvrAB, like MutL, modulate UvrD helicase activity. This stimulation likely plays a role in DNA strand and protein displacement by UvrD in nucleotide excision repair. Promotion of UvrD-catalyzed unwinding of nicked duplexes by UvrAB may also explain the need for UvrAB and UvrD in Okazaki fragment processing in cells lacking DNA polymerase I. More generally, these data support the idea that helicase activity is regulated in vivo, with helicases acting as part of multisubunit complexes rather than in isolation.

The UvrA protein is the initial damage-recognizing factor in bacterial nucleotide excision repair. Each monomer of the UvrA dimer contains two ATPase sites. Using single-molecule analysis we show that dimerization of UvrA in the presence of ATP is significantly higher than with ADP or nonhydrolyzable ATPgammaS, suggesting that the active UvrA dimer contains a mixture of ADP and ATP. We also show that the UvrA dimer has a high preference of binding the end of a linear DNA fragment, independent on the presence or type of cofactor. Apparently ATP binding or hydrolysis is not needed to discriminate between DNA ends and internal sites. A significant number of complexes could be detected where one UvrA dimer bridges two DNA ends implying the presence of two separate DNA-binding domains, most likely present in each monomer. On DNA containing a site-specific lesion the damage-specific binding is much higher than DNA-end binding, but only in the absence of cofactor or with ATP. With ATPgammaS no discrimination between a DNA end and a DNA damage could be observed. We present a model where damage recognition of UvrA depends on the ability of both UvrA monomers to interact with the DNA flanking the lesion.

UvrB is the main damage recognition protein in bacterial nucleotide excision repair and is capable of recognizing various structurally unrelated types of damage. Previously we have shown that upon binding of Escherichia coli UvrB to damaged DNA two nucleotides become extrahelical: the nucleotide directly 3' to the lesion and its base-pairing partner in the non-damaged strand. Here we demonstrate using a novel fluorescent 2-aminopurine-menthol modification that the position of the damaged nucleotide itself does not change upon UvrB binding. A co-crystal structure of B. caldotenax UvrB and DNA has revealed that one nucleotide is flipped out of the DNA helix into a pocket of the UvrB protein where it stacks on Phe249 [J.J. Truglio, E. Karakas, B. Hau, H. Wang, M.J. DellaVecchia, B. van Houten, C. Kisker, Structural basis for DNA recognition and processing by UvrB, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13 (2006) 360-364]. By mutating the equivalent of Phe249 (Tyr249) in the E. coli UvrB protein we show that on damaged DNA neither of the extrahelical nucleotides is inserted into this protein pocket. The mutant UvrB protein, however, resulted in an increased binding and incision of undamaged DNA showing that insertion of a base into the nucleotide-binding pocket is important for dissociation of UvrB from undamaged sites. Replacing the nucleotides in the non-damaged strand with a C3-linker revealed that the extruded base in the non-damaged strand is not directly involved in UvrB-binding or UvrC-mediated incision, but that its displacement is needed to allow access for residues of UvrB or UvrC to the neighboring base, which is directly opposite the DNA damage. This interaction is shown to be essential for optimal 3'-incision by UvrC. After 3'-incision base flipping in the non-damaged DNA strand is lost, indicative for a conformational change needed to prepare the UvrB-DNA complex for 5'-incision.

From the start of the first primitive life forms on earth ultraviolet (UV) light has been a seriously threatening factor. UV light is absorbed by the DNA causing several types of damage that can interfere with transcription and replication. In bacteria a number of different repair mechanisms have evolved to repair these UV-induced lesions. These mechanisms include direct reversal of the damage by a photolyase (photoreactivation), removing of the damaged base by a DNA glycosylase (base excision repair, BER), incision of the DNA adjacent to the damage by an endonuclease (UV-damage endonuclease, UVDE) or removal of a complete oligonucleotide containing the damage (nucleotide excision repair, NER). This paper presents an inventory of genes encoding enzymes involved in these repair pathways based on the analysis of complete genome sequences of a large number of eubacteria and archaebacteria. From the comparison of homologous sequences between the different species a picture emerges how the repair systems have been transmitted during evolution. In addition, a comparative analysis of amino acid sequences of homologous proteins allows the prediction of specific functions in as yet uncharacterized proteins or protein domains.