Search

BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of the AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) vaccine in a large, diverse population at increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in the United States, Chile, and Peru has not been known.MethodsIn this ongoing, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial, we investigated the safety, vaccine efficacy, and immunogenicity of two doses of AZD1222 as compared with placebo in preventing the onset of symptomatic and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) 15 days or more after the second dose in adults, including older adults, in the United States, Chile, and Peru.ResultsA total of 32,451 participants underwent randomization, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive AZD1222 (21,635 participants) or placebo (10,816 participants). AZD1222 was safe, with low incidences of serious and medically attended adverse events and adverse events of special interest; the incidences were similar to those observed in the placebo group. Solicited local and systemic reactions were generally mild or moderate in both groups. Overall estimated vaccine efficacy was 74.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.3 to 80.5; P

We discuss imiquimod associated with non-application site mucosal reactions and two of our own clinical cases. In one of our patients, erosive cheilitis developed in a young boy after using topical imiquimod 5% cream for 5 nights weekly on bilateral cheeks, chin, and near vermillion border for molluscum contagiosum. The case is discussed with concerns for imiquimod use in molluscum contagiosum when used near mucosal surfaces.

BACKGROUND. We report updated safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) from an ongoing phase 3 trial. METHODS. Adults at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection were randomized (2:1), stratified by age, to receive 2 doses of AZD1222 or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcriptase PCR-positive (RT-PCRpositive) symptomatic COVID-19 at 15 or more days after a second dose in baseline SARS-CoV-2-seronegative participants. The 21,634 and 10,816 participants were randomized to AZD1222 and placebo, respectively. FINDINGS. Data cutoff for this analysis was July 30, 2021; median follow-up from second dose was 78 and 71 days for the doubleblind period (censoring at unblinding or nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination) and 201 and 82 days for the period to nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination (regardless of unblinding) in the AZD1222 and placebo groups, respectively. For the primary efficacy end point in the double-blind period (141 and 184 events; incidence rates: 39.2 and 118.8 per 1,000 person years), vaccine efficacy was 67.0% (P < 0.001). In the period to nonstudy COVID-19 vaccination, incidence of events remained consistently low and stable through 6 months in the AZD1222 group; for the primary efficacy end point (328 and 219 events; incidence rates: 36.4, 108.4) and severe/ critical disease (5 and 13 events; incidence rates: 0.6, 6.4), respective vaccine efficacy estimates were 65.1% and 92.1%. AZD1222 elicited humoral immune responses over time, with waning at day 180. No emergent safety issues were seen. CONCLUSION. AZD1222 is safe and well tolerated, demonstrating durable protection and immunogenicity with median followup (AZD1222 group) of 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04516746. FUNDING. AstraZeneca; US government., Introduction There is an ongoing critical need for vaccination in the fight against the global COVID-19 pandemic. Understanding the durability of vaccine efficacy (VE) and immunogenicity is important in the [...]

Background: Immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is now widespread; however, the degree of cross-immunity between SARS-CoV-2 and endemic, seasonal human coronaviruses (HCoVs) remains unclear. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV cross-immunity was evaluated in adult participants enrolled in a US sub-study in the phase III, randomized controlled trial (NCT04516746) of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) primary-series vaccination for one-year. Anti-HCoV spike-binding antibodies against HCoV-229E, HCoVHKU1, HCoV-OC43, and HCoV-NL63 were evaluated in participants following study dosing and, in the AZD1222 group, after a non-study third-dose booster. Timing of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion (assessed via anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels) and incidence of COVID-19 were evaluated in those who received AZD1222 primary-series by baseline anti-HCoV titers. Results: We evaluated 2,020/21,634 participants in the AZD1222 group and 1,007/10,816 in the placebo group. At the one-year data cutoff (March 11, 2022) mean duration of follow up was 230.9 (SD: 106.36, range: 1-325) and 94.3 (74.12, 1-321) days for participants in the AZD1222 (n = 1,940) and placebo (n = 962) groups, respectively. We observed little elevation in anti-HCoV humoral titers post study-dosing or post-boosting, nor evidence of waning over time. The occurrence and timing of SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion and incidence of COVID-19 were not largely impacted by baseline anti-HCoV titers. Conclusion: We found limited evidence for cross-immunity between SARS-CoV-2 and HCoVs following AZD1222 primary series and booster vaccination. Susceptibility to future emergence of novel coronaviruses will likely persist despite a high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 immunity in global populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To determine household and health-care provider costs associated with Plasmodium vivax infection across a range of endemic settings. Methods We collected cost data alongside three multicentre clinical trials of P vivax treatment in Afghanistan, Brazil, Colombia, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Philippines, Peru, Thailand and Viet Nam conducted between April 2014 to December 2017. We derived household costs from trial participant surveys administered at enrolment and again 2 weeks later to determine the costs of treatment and transportation, and the number of days that patients and their household caregivers were unable to undertake their usual activities. We determined costs of routine care by health-care providers by micro-costing the resources used to diagnose and treat P vivax at the study sites. Findings The mean total household costs ranged from 8.7 United States dollars (US$; standard deviation, SD: 4.3) in Afghanistan to US$ 254.7 (SD: 148.4) in Colombia. Across all countries, productivity losses were the largest household cost component, resulting in mean indirect costs ranging from US$ 5.3 (SD: 3.0) to US$ 220.8 (SD: 158.40). The range of health-care provider costs for routine care was US$ 3.6-6.6. The cost of administering a glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase rapid diagnostic test, ranged from US$ 0.9 to 13.5, consistently lower than the costs of the widely-used fluorescent spot test (US$ 6.3 to 17.4). Conclusion An episode of P vivax malaria results in high costs to households. The costs of diagnosing and treating P vivax are important inputs for future cost-effectiveness analyses to ensure optimal allocation of resources for malaria elimination. Objectif Determiner les couts, pour les menages et les prestataires de soins, associes a l'infection par Plasmodium vivax dans differentes zones endemiques. Methodes Nous avons recueilli des donnees sur les couts a l'occasion de trois essais cliniques multicentres relatifs au traitement contre P vivax menes en Afghanistan, au Bresil, en Colombie, en Ethiopie, en Indonesie, aux Philippines, au Perou, en Thailande et au Viet Nam entre avril 2014 et decembre 2017. Nous avons calcule les couts pour les menages a partir d'enquetes realisees aupres des participants aux essais, lors de leur admission puis 2 semaines plus tard, afin de determiner les couts de traitement et de transport ainsi que le nombre de jours ou les patients et leurs aidants familiaux n'avaient pu accomplir leurs activites habituelles. Nous avons determine le cout des soins courants par les prestataires de soins en calculant le cout individuel des ressources utilisees pour diagnostiquer et traiter P vivax sur le site des etudes. Resultats Les couts totaux moyens pour les menages allaient de 8.7 dollars des Etats-Unis ($ US; ecart type, ET: 4,3) en Afghanistan a 254.7 $ US (ET: 148,4) en Colombie. Tous pays confondus, les pertes de productivity etaient la principale composante des couts pour les menages, puisqu'elles entrainaient des couts indirects moyens allant de 5,3 $ US (ET: 3,0) a 220,8 $ US (ET: 158,40). En ce qui concerne les prestataires de soins, le cout des soins courants allait de 3,6 a 6,6 $ US. Le cout de realisation d'un test de diagnostic rapide base sur le glucose6- phosphate-deshydrogenase variait de 0,9 $ US a 13,5 $ US, un cout toujours inferieur a celui du tres repandu test par fluorescence (6,3 $ US a 17,4 $ US). Conclusion Un episode de paludisme a P vivax entraine des couts eleves pour les menages. Connaitre les couts du diagnostic et du traitement de P vivax sera fort utile aux futures analyses cout-efficacite. Cela permettra d'affecter les ressources de maniere optimale en vue d'eradiquer le paludisme. Objetivo Determinar los costos del hogar y de los proveedores de atencion de la salud asociados con la infeccion por Plasmodium vivax en una variedad de ambitos endemicos. Metodos Se recopilaron datos de costos junto con tres ensayos clinicos multicentricos del tratamiento con P. vivax en Afganistan, Brasil, Colombia, Etiopia, Filipinas, Indonesia, Peru, Tailandia y Vietnam realizados entre abril de 2014 y diciembre de 2017. Los costos del hogar se derivaron de las encuestas de los participantes del ensayo administradas en el momento de la inscripcion y de nuevo dos semanas despues para determinar los costos del tratamiento y del transporte, asi como el numero de dias en que los pacientes y los cuidadores en el hogar no pudieron llevar a cabo sus actividades habituales. Se determinaron los costos de la atencion de rutina por parte de los proveedores de atencion de la salud mediante el microcosto de los recursos utilizados para diagnosticar y tratar el P. vivax en los centros de estudio. Resultados Los costos totales promedio de los hogares oscilaron entre 8,7 dolares estadounidenses (USD; desviacion estandar, DE: 4,3) en Afganistan y 254,7 USD (DE: 148,4) en Colombia. En todos los paises, las perdidas de productividad fueron el mayor componente del costo del hogar, lo que dio lugar a costos indirectos promedios que oscilaron entre 5,3 y 220,8 USD. El rango de los costos de los proveedores de atencion de la salud para la atencion de rutina fue de 3,6 a 6,6 USD. El costo por administrar una prueba de diagnostico rapido de la glucosa-6- fosfatodeshidrogenasa, vario de 0,9 a 13,5 USD, consistentemente mas bajo que los costos de la prueba de fluorescencia aleatoria ampliamente utilizada (6,3 a 17,4 USD). Conclusion Un episodio de malaria por P. vivax tiene como resultado un alto costo para el hogar. Los costos del diagnostico y tratamiento de P. vivax son insumos importantes para futuros analisis de costoefectividad que aseguren una asignacion optima de recursos para la eliminacion de la malaria., Introduction Outside Sub-Saharan Africa, Plasmodium vivax is now the predominant cause of malaria, affecting 14.0 million patients in 2016. (1) While cost-effectiveness analyses can inform the efficient provision of health-care [...]

The yeast-based postbiotic EpiCor is a well-studied formulation, consisting of a complex mixture of bioactive molecules. In clinical studies, EpiCor postbiotic has been shown to reduce intestinal symptoms in a constipated population and support mucosal defense in healthy subjects. Anti-inflammatory potential and butyrogenic properties have been reported in vitro, suggesting a possible link between EpiCor’s gut modulatory activity and immunomodulation. The current study used a standardized in vitro gut model, the Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME R ), to obtain a deeper understanding on host-microbiome interactions and potential microbiome modulation following repeated EpiCor administration. It was observed that EpiCor induced a functional shift in carbohydrate fermentation patterns in the proximal colon environment. Epicor promoted an increased abundance of Bifidobacterium in both the proximal and distal colon, affecting overall microbial community structure. Co-occurrence network analysis at the phylum level provided additional evidence of changes in the functional properties of microbial community promoted by EpiCor, increasing positive associations between Actinobacteria with microbes belonging to the Firmicutes phylum. These results, together with a significant increase in butyrate production provide additional support of EpiCor benefits to gut health. Investigation of host-microbiome interactions confirmed the immunomodulatory potential of the applied test product. Specific microbial alterations were observed in the distal colon, with metabotyping indicating that specific metabolic pathways, such as bile acid and tryptophan metabolism, were affected following EpiCor supplementation. These results, especially considering many effects were seen distally, further strengthen the position of EpiCor as a postbiotic with health promoting functionality in the gut, which could be further assessed in vivo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]