Search

Your search keyword '"Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445]"' showing total 16 results
Start Over Author "Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445]"
16 results on '"Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445]"'

1. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets – XLV. Two Neptune mass planets orbiting HD 13808 : a study of stellar activity modelling’s impact on planet detection

Author

Annelies Mortier, Susan E. Thompson, C. Lovis, Damien Ségransan, Will Handley, E. Ahrer, M. Mayor, Richard J. Hall, Vinesh Rajpaul, Stéphane Udry, François Bouchy, Francesco Pepe, N. Unger, Didier Queloz, Queloz, Didier [0000-0002-3012-0316], Rajpaul, Vinesh [0000-0001-7576-6703], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, and Mortier, Annelies [0000-0001-7254-4363]

Subjects
Dwarf star, astro-ph.SR, stars: individual: HD 13808, FOS: Physical sciences, 01 natural sciences, Planet, Robustness (computer science), Neptune, techniques: radial velocities, stars: activity, 0103 physical sciences, Spurious relationship, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), Nested sampling algorithm, Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR), QB, Physics, Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP), methods: statistical, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Astronomy, Sampling (statistics), Astronomy and Astrophysics, methods: data analysis, Exoplanet, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, 13. Climate action, Space and Planetary Science, astro-ph.EP, Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, astro-ph.IM
Abstract

We present a comprehensive analysis of 10 years of HARPS radial velocities of the K2V dwarf star HD 13808, which has previously been reported to host two unconfirmed planet candidates. We use the state-of-the-art nested sampling algorithm PolyChord to compare a wide variety of stellar activity models, including simple models exploiting linear correlations between RVs and stellar activity indicators, harmonic models for the activity signals, and a more sophisticated Gaussian process regression model. We show that the use of overly-simplistic stellar activity models that are not well-motivated physically can lead to spurious `detections' of planetary signals that are almost certainly not real. We also reveal some difficulties inherent in parameter and model inference in cases where multiple planetary signals may be present. Our study thus underlines the importance both of exploring a variety of competing models and of understanding the limitations and precision settings of one's sampling algorithm. We also show that at least in the case of HD 13808, we always arrive at consistent conclusions about two particular signals present in the RV, regardless of the stellar activity model we adopt; these two signals correspond to the previously-reported though unconfirmed planet candidate signals. Given the robustness and precision with which we can characterize these two signals, we deem them secure planet detections. In particular, we find two planets orbiting HD 13808 at distances of 0.11, 0.26 AU with periods of 14.2, 53.8 d, and minimum masses of 11, 10 Earth masses., Comment: 17 pages, 6 figures, 13 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Published
2021

2. Planck 2018 results: IV. Diffuse component separation

Author

Akrami, Y, Ashdown, M, Aumont, J, Baccigalupi, C, Ballardini, M, Banday, AJ, Barreiro, RB, Bartolo, N, Basak, S, Benabed, K, Bersanelli, M, Bielewicz, P, Bond, Borrill, J, Bouchet, FR, Boulanger, F, Bucher, M, Burigana, C, Calabrese, E, Cardoso, JF, Carron, J, Casaponsa, B, Challinor, A, Colombo, LPL, Combet, C, Crill, BP, Cuttaia, F, De Bernardis, P, De Rosa, A, De Zotti, G, Delabrouille, J, Delouis, JM, Di Valentino, E, Dickinson, C, Diego, JM, Donzelli, S, Doré, O, Ducout, A, Dupac, X, Efstathiou, G, Elsner, F, Enßlin, TA, Eriksen, HK, Falgarone, E, Fernandez-Cobos, R, Finelli, F, Forastieri, F, Frailis, M, Fraisse, AA, Franceschi, E, Frolov, A, Galeotta, S, Galli, S, Ganga, K, Génova-Santos, RT, Gerbino, M, Ghosh, T, González-Nuevo, J, Górski, KM, Gratton, S, Gruppuso, A, Gudmundsson, JE, Handley, W, Hansen, FK, Helou, G, Herranz, D, Hildebrandt, Huang, Z, Jaffe, AH, Karakci, A, Keihänen, E, Keskitalo, R, Kiiveri, K, Kim, J, Kisner, TS, Krachmalnicoff, N, Kunz, M, Kurki-Suonio, H, Lagache, G, Lamarre, JM, Lasenby, A, Lattanzi, M, Lawrence, CR, Le Jeune, M, Levrier, F, Liguori, M, Lilje, PB, Lindholm, V, López-Caniego, M, Lubin, PM, Ma, YZ, Maciás-Pérez, JF, Maggio, G, Maino, D, Mandolesi, N, Mangilli, A, Marcos-Caballero, A, Maris, M, Martin, PG, Martínez-González, E, Challinor, Anthony [0000-0003-3479-7823], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
general [ISM], cosmology: observations, astro-ph.CO, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, cosmic background radiation, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Galaxy: general, observations [cosmology], general [Galaxy], Astronomical and Space Sciences, ISM: general, diffuse radiation
Abstract

We present full-sky maps of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) and polarized synchrotron and thermal dust emission, derived from the third set ofPlanckfrequency maps. These products have significantly lower contamination from instrumental systematic effects than previous versions. The methodologies used to derive these maps follow closely those described in earlier papers, adopting four methods (Commander,NILC,SEVEM, andSMICA) to extract the CMB component, as well as three methods (Commander,GNILC, andSMICA) to extract astrophysical components. Our revised CMB temperature maps agree with corresponding products in thePlanck2015 delivery, whereas the polarization maps exhibit significantly lower large-scale power, reflecting the improved data processing described in companion papers; however, the noise properties of the resulting data products are complicated, and the best available end-to-end simulations exhibit relative biases with respect to the data at the few percent level. Using these maps, we are for the first time able to fit the spectral index of thermal dust independently over 3° regions. We derive a conservative estimate of the mean spectral index of polarized thermal dust emission ofβd = 1.55 ± 0.05, where the uncertainty marginalizes both over all known systematic uncertainties and different estimation techniques. For polarized synchrotron emission, we find a mean spectral index ofβs = −3.1 ± 0.1, consistent with previously reported measurements. We note that the current data processing does not allow for construction of unbiased single-bolometer maps, and this limits our ability to extract CO emission and correlated components. The foreground results for intensity derived in this paper therefore do not supersede correspondingPlanck2015 products. For polarization the new results supersede the corresponding 2015 products in all respects.

Published
2020

3. Planck 2018 results: IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

Author

Akrami, Y, Arroja, F, Ashdown, M, Aumont, J, Baccigalupi, C, Ballardini, M, Banday, AJ, Barreiro, RB, Bartolo, N, Basak, S, Benabed, K, Bernard, JP, Bersanelli, M, Bielewicz, P, Bond, JR, Borrill, J, Bouchet, FR, Bucher, M, Burigana, C, Butler, RC, Calabrese, E, Cardoso, JF, Casaponsa, B, Challinor, A, Chiang, HC, Colombo, LPL, Combet, C, Crill, BP, Cuttaia, F, De Bernardis, P, De Rosa, A, De Zotti, G, Delabrouille, J, Delouis, JM, Di Valentino, E, Diego, JM, Doré, O, Douspis, M, Ducout, A, Dupac, X, Dusini, S, Efstathiou, G, Elsner, F, Enßlin, TA, Eriksen, HK, Fantaye, Y, Fergusson, J, Fernandez-Cobos, R, Finelli, F, Frailis, M, Fraisse, AA, Franceschi, E, Frolov, A, Galeotta, S, Galli, S, Ganga, K, Génova-Santos, RT, Gerbino, M, González-Nuevo, J, Górski, KM, Gratton, S, Gruppuso, A, Gudmundsson, JE, Hamann, J, Handley, W, Hansen, FK, Herranz, D, Hivon, E, Huang, Z, Jaffe, AH, Jones, WC, Jung, G, Keihänen, E, Keskitalo, R, Kiiveri, K, Kim, J, Krachmalnicoff, N, Kunz, M, Kurki-Suonio, H, Lamarre, JM, Lasenby, A, Lattanzi, M, Lawrence, CR, Le Jeune, M, Levrier, F, Lewis, A, Liguori, M, Lilje, PB, Lindholm, V, López-Caniego, M, Ma, YZ, Maciás-Pérez, JF, Maggio, G, Maino, D, Mandolesi, N, Marcos-Caballero, A, Maris, M, Martin, PG, Martínez-González, E, Matarrese, S, Challinor, Anthony [0000-0003-3479-7823], Fergusson, James [0000-0003-4820-171X], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
theory [cosmology], gr-qc, hep-th, hep-ph, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, cosmic background radiation, early Universe, Astronomy & Astrophysics, methods: data analysis, observations [cosmology], cosmology: observations, cosmology: theory, data analysis [methods], astro-ph.CO, inflation, Astronomical and Space Sciences
Abstract

© 2020 EDP Sciences. All rights reserved. We analyse the Planck full-mission cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature and E-mode polarization maps to obtain constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity (NG). We compare estimates obtained from separable template-fitting, binned, and optimal modal bispectrum estimators, finding consistent values for the local, equilateral, and orthogonal bispectrum amplitudes. Our combined temperature and polarization analysis produces the following final results: flocalNL= -0.9 ± 5.1; fequilNL= -26 ± 47; and forthoNL= -38 ± 24 (68% CL, statistical). These results include low-multipole (4 ≤ ℓ < 40) polarization data that are not included in our previous analysis. The results also pass an extensive battery of tests (with additional tests regarding foreground residuals compared to 2015), and they are stable with respect to our 2015 measurements (with small fluctuations, at the level of a fraction of a standard deviation, which is consistent with changes in data processing). Polarizationonly bispectra display a significant improvement in robustness; they can now be used independently to set primordial NG constraints with a sensitivity comparable to WMAP temperature-based results and they give excellent agreement. In addition to the analysis of the standard local, equilateral, and orthogonal bispectrum shapes, we consider a large number of additional cases, such as scale-dependent feature and resonance bispectra, isocurvature primordial NG, and parity-breaking models, where we also place tight constraints but do not detect any signal. The nonprimordial lensing bispectrum is, however, detected with an improved significance compared to 2015, excluding the null hypothesis at 3.5σ. Beyond estimates of individual shape amplitudes, we also present model-independent reconstructions and analyses of the Planck CMB bispectrum. Our final constraint on the local primordial trispectrum shape is glocalNL= (-5.8 ± 6.5) × 104(68% CL, statistical), while constraints for other trispectrum shapes are also determined. Exploiting the tight limits on various bispectrum and trispectrum shapes, we constrain the parameter space of different early-Universe scenarios that generate primordial NG, including general single-field models of inflation, multi-field models (e.g. curvaton models), models of inflation with axion fields producing parity-violation bispectra in the tensor sector, and inflationary models involving vector-like fields with directionally-dependent bispectra. Our results provide a high-precision test for structure-formation scenarios, showing complete agreement with the basic picture of the CDM cosmology regarding the statistics of the initial conditions, with cosmic structures arising from adiabatic, passive, Gaussian, and primordial seed perturbations.

Published
2020

4. Global Analysis of the TRAPPIST Ultra-Cool Dwarf Transit Survey

Author

F. Lienhard, Aurélie Mortier, C. Murray, Laetitia Delrez, Emmanuel Jehin, A. Burdanov, Elsa Ducrot, Amaury H. M. J. Triaud, D. Queloz, Benjamin V. Rackham, Will Handley, Edward Gillen, Michaël Gillon, Queloz, Didier [0000-0002-3012-0316], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Mortier, Annelies [0000-0001-7254-4363], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
planets and satellites: detection, Pipeline (computing), FOS: Physical sciences, 010103 numerical & computational mathematics, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, 01 natural sciences, techniques: photometric, Planet, 0103 physical sciences, Astrophysics::Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, Transit (astronomy), 0101 mathematics, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR), Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics, Physics, Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP), Astronomy, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Radius, Orbital period, Light curve, Robotic telescope, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, 13. Climate action, Space and Planetary Science, TRAPPIST, Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, atmospheric effects, Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Abstract

We conducted a global analysis of the TRAPPIST Ultra-Cool Dwarf Transit Survey - a prototype of the SPECULOOS transit search conducted with the TRAPPIST-South robotic telescope in Chile from 2011 to 2017 - to estimate the occurrence rate of close-in planets such as TRAPPIST-1b orbiting ultra-cool dwarfs. For this purpose, the photometric data of 40 nearby ultra-cool dwarfs were reanalysed in a self-consistent and fully automated manner starting from the raw images. The pipeline developed specifically for this task generates differential light curves, removes non-planetary photometric features and stellar variability, and searches for transits. It identifies the transits of TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c without any human intervention. To test the pipeline and the potential output of similar surveys, we injected planetary transits into the light curves on a star-by-star basis and tested whether the pipeline is able to detect them. The achieved photometric precision enables us to identify Earth-sized planets orbiting ultra-cool dwarfs as validated by the injection tests. Our planet-injection simulation further suggests a lower limit of 10 per cent on the occurrence rate of planets similar to TRAPPIST-1b with a radius between 1 and 1.3 $R_\oplus$ and the orbital period between 1.4 and 1.8 days., Accepted for publication in MNRAS, 21 pages, 18 figures, 3 tables

Published
2020

5. Planck 2018 results: V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods

Author

Aghanim, N, Akrami, Y, Ashdown, M, Aumont, J, Baccigalupi, C, Ballardini, M, Banday, AJ, Barreiro, RB, Bartolo, N, Basak, S, Benabed, K, Bernard, JP, Bersanelli, M, Bielewicz, P, Bock, JJ, Bond, JR, Borrill, J, Bouchet, FR, Boulanger, F, Bucher, M, Burigana, C, Butler, RC, Calabrese, E, Cardoso, JF, Carron, J, Casaponsa, B, Challinor, A, Chiang, HC, Colombo, LPL, Combet, C, Crill, BP, Cuttaia, F, De Bernardis, P, De Rosa, A, De Zotti, G, Delabrouille, J, Delouis, JM, Di Valentino, E, Diego, JM, Doré, O, Douspis, M, Ducout, A, Dupac, X, Dusini, S, Efstathiou, G, Elsner, F, Enßlin, TA, Eriksen, HK, Fantaye, Y, Fernandez-Cobos, R, Finelli, F, Frailis, M, Fraisse, AA, Franceschi, E, Frolov, A, Galeotta, S, Galli, S, Ganga, K, Génova-Santos, RT, Gerbino, M, Ghosh, T, Giraud-Héraud, Y, González-Nuevo, J, Górski, KM, Gratton, S, Gruppuso, A, Gudmundsson, JE, Hamann, J, Handley, W, Hansen, FK, Herranz, D, Hivon, E, Huang, Z, Jaffe, AH, Jones, WC, Keihänen, E, Keskitalo, R, Kiiveri, K, Kim, J, Kisner, TS, Krachmalnicoff, N, Kunz, M, Kurki-Suonio, H, Lagache, G, Lamarre, JM, Lasenby, A, Lattanzi, M, Lawrence, CR, Le Jeune, M, Levrier, F, Lewis, A, Liguori, M, Lilje, PB, Lilley, M, Lindholm, V, López-Caniego, M, Lubin, PM, Ma, YZ, Maciás-Pérez, JF, Maggio, G, Challinor, Anthony [0000-0003-3479-7823], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
cosmology: observations, data analysis [methods], astro-ph.CO, cosmic background radiation, Astronomy & Astrophysics, cosmological parameters, methods: data analysis, observations [cosmology], Astronomical and Space Sciences
Abstract

We describe the legacy Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) likelihoods derived from the 2018 data release. The overall approach is similar in spirit to the one retained for the 2013 and 2015 data release, with a hybrid method using different approximations at low (ℓ < 30) and high (ℓ ≥ 30) multipoles, implementing several methodological and data-analysis refinements compared to previous releases. With more realistic simulations, and better correction and modelling of systematic effects, we can now make full use of the CMB polarization observed in the High Frequency Instrument (HFI) channels. The low-multipole EE cross-spectra from the 100 GHz and 143 GHz data give a constraint on the λCDM reionization optical-depth parameter τ to better than 15% (in combination with the TT low-ℓ data and the high-ℓ temperature and polarization data), tightening constraints on all parameters with posterior distributions correlated with τ. We also update the weaker constraint on τ from the joint TEB likelihood using the Low Frequency Instrument (LFI) channels, which was used in 2015 as part of our baseline analysis. At higher multipoles, the CMB temperature spectrum and likelihood are very similar to previous releases. A better model of the temperature-to-polarization leakage and corrections for the effective calibrations of the polarization channels (i.e., the polarization efficiencies) allow us to make full use of polarization spectra, improving the λCDM constraints on the parameters θMC, ωc, ωb, and H0 by more than 30%, and ns by more than 20% compared to TT-only constraints. Extensive tests on the robustness of the modelling of the polarization data demonstrate good consistency, with some residual modelling uncertainties. At high multipoles, we are now limited mainly by the accuracy of the polarization efficiency modelling. Using our various tests, simulations, and comparison between different high-multipole likelihood implementations, we estimate the consistency of the results to be better than the 0.5σ level on the λCDM parameters, as well as classical single-parameter extensions for the joint likelihood (to be compared to the 0.3σ levels we achieved in 2015 for the temperature data alone on λCDM only). Minor curiosities already present in the previous releases remain, such as the differences between the best-fit λCDM parameters for the ℓ < 800 and ℓ > 800 ranges of the power spectrum, or the preference for more smoothing of the power-spectrum peaks than predicted in λCDM fits. These are shown to be driven by the temperature power spectrum and are not significantly modified by the inclusion of the polarization data. Overall, the legacy Planck CMB likelihoods provide a robust tool for constraining the cosmological model and represent a reference for future CMB observations.

Published
2020

6. Planck 2018 results: I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck

Author

Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Arroja, F., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., Battye, R., Benabed, K., Bernard, J. -P., Bersanelli, M., Bielewicz, P., Bock, J. J., Bond, J. R., Borrill, J., Bouchet, F. R., Boulanger, F., Bucher, M., BURIGANA, CARLO, Butler, R. C., Calabrese, E., Cardoso, J. -F., Carron, J., Casaponsa, B., Challinor, A., Chiang, H. C., Colombo, L. P. L., Combet, C., Contreras, D., Crill, B. P., CUTTAIA, FRANCESCO, de Bernardis, P., de Zotti, G., Delabrouille, J., Delouis, J. -M., Désert, F. -X., Di Valentino, E., Dickinson, C., Diego, J. M., Donzelli, S., Doré, O., Douspis, M., Ducout, A., Dupac, X., Efstathiou, G., Elsner, F., Enßlin, T. A., Eriksen, H. K., Falgarone, E., Fantaye, Y., Fergusson, J., Fernandez-Cobos, R., FINELLI, FABIO, Forastieri, F., FRAILIS, Marco, FRANCESCHI, ENRICO, Frolov, A., GALEOTTA, Samuele, Galli, S., Ganga, K., Génova-Santos, R. T., Gerbino, M., Ghosh, T., González-Nuevo, J., Górski, K. M., Gratton, S., GRUPPUSO, ALESSANDRO, Gudmundsson, J. E., Hamann, J., Handley, W., Hansen, F. K., Helou, G., Herranz, D., Hildebrandt, S. R., Hivon, E., Huang, Z., Jaffe, A. H., Jones, W. C., Karakci, A., Keihänen, E., Keskitalo, R., Kiiveri, K., Kim, J., Kisner, T. S., Knox, L., Krachmalnicoff, N., Kunz, M., Kurki-Suonio, H., Lagache, G., Lamarre, J. -M., Langer, M., Lasenby, A., LATTANZI, Mario Gilberto, Lawrence, C. R., Le Jeune, M., Leahy, J. P., Lesgourgues, J., Levrier, F., Lewis, A., Liguori, M., Lilje, P. B., Lilley, M., Lindholm, V., López-Caniego, M., Lubin, P. M., Ma, Y. -Z., Macías-Pérez, J. F., MAGGIO, Gianmarco, Maino, D., Mandolesi, N., Mangilli, A., Marcos-Caballero, A., MARIS, Michele, Martin, P. G., Martinelli, M., Martínez-González, E., Matarrese, S., Mauri, N., McEwen, J. D., Meerburg, P. D., Meinhold, P. R., Melchiorri, A., Mennella, A., Migliaccio, M., Millea, M., Mitra, S., Miville-Deschênes, M. -A., Molinari, D., Moneti, A., Montier, L., MORGANTE, GIANLUCA, Moss, A., Mottet, S., Münchmeyer, M., Natoli, P., Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U., Oxborrow, C. A., Pagano, L., PAOLETTI, DANIELA, Partridge, B., Patanchon, G., Pearson, T. J., Peel, M., Peiris, H. V., PERROTTA, Francesca, Pettorino, V., Piacentini, F., Polastri, L., Polenta, G., Puget, J. -L., Rachen, J. P., Reinecke, M., Remazeilles, M., Renault, C., Renzi, A., Rocha, G., Rosset, C., Roudier, G., Rubiño-Martín, J. A., Ruiz-Granados, B., SALVATI, LAURA, SANDRI, MAURA, Savelainen, M., Scott, D., Shellard, E. P. S., Shiraishi, M., Sirignano, C., Sirri, G., Spencer, L. D., Sunyaev, R., Suur-Uski, A. -S., Tauber, J. A., TAVAGNACCO , DANIELE, Tenti, M., TERENZI, LUCA, Toffolatti, L., Tomasi, M., Trombetti, T., Valiviita, J., Van Tent, B., Vibert, L., Vielva, P., VILLA, FABRIZIO, Vittorio, N., Wandelt, B. D., Wehus, I. K., White, M., White, S. D. M., ZACCHEI, Andrea, Zonca, A., Universidad de Cantabria, Institut de recherche en astrophysique et planétologie (IRAP), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris (IAP), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'Etude du Rayonnement et de la Matière en Astrophysique (LERMA (UMR_8112)), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University (PSL)-PSL Research University (PSL)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut d'astrophysique spatiale (IAS), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), AstroParticule et Cosmologie (APC (UMR_7164)), Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University (PSL)-PSL Research University (PSL)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie (LPSC), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Institut Polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Institut de Planétologie et d'Astrophysique de Grenoble (IPAG), Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble (OSUG), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies pour l'environnement et l'agriculture (IRSTEA)-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES), Institut Lagrange de Paris, Sorbonne Universités, Astrophysique Interprétation Modélisation (AIM (UMR_7158 / UMR_E_9005 / UM_112)), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Laboratoire de Physique Théorique d'Orsay [Orsay] (LPT), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Planck, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....] (UGA [2020-....])-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology [2020-....] (Grenoble INP [2020-....]), Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....] (UGA [2020-....]), Institut de Planétologie et d'Astrophysique de Grenoble [2020-....] (IPAG [2020-....]), Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble [2020-....] (OSUG [2020-....]), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....] (UGA [2020-....])-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....] (UGA [2020-....]), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Astrophysique, Laboratoire de physique de l'ENS - ENS Paris (LPENS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), University of Parma = Università degli studi di Parma [Parme, Italie], Computing and Mathematical Sciences [Pasadena]], California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics (CITA), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [Berkeley] (LBNL), Patrimoine, Littérature, Histoire (PLH), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique (LRI), CentraleSupélec-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), CentraleSupélec, Universidade Aberta [Lisboa], Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Lyon (UNICANCER/CRCL), Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon]-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon], Dipartimento di Fisica [Roma La Sapienza], Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' = Sapienza University [Rome], Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Observatoire des Sciences de l'Univers de Grenoble (OSUG ), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Observatoire de Paris, Laboratory for Phytosanitary Diagnostics and Forecasts, All-Russian Institute for Plant Protection, Russian Academy of Sciences [Moscow] (RAS), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences [Ann Arbor] (AOSS), University of Michigan [Ann Arbor], University of Michigan System-University of Michigan System, ICRA and Physics Department, Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Dipartimento di Fisica 'G. Galilei', Universita degli Studi di Padova, University of Cambridge [UK] (CAM), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Hautes Énergies (LPNHE), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC), University College of London [London] (UCL), University of Manchester [Manchester], Venetian Institute Molecular Medicine (VIMM), University of British Columbia (UBC), Laboratoire de neurobiologie cellulaire et moléculaire (NBCM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (IJCLab), Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), USDA-ARS : Agricultural Research Service, Planck Collaboration, Department of Physics, Helsinki Institute of Physics, European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España), European Research Council, European Space Agency, Aghanim N., Akrami Y., Arroja F., Ashdown M., Aumont J., Baccigalupi C., Ballardini M., Banday A.J., Barreiro R.B., Bartolo N., Basak S., Battye R., Benabed K., Bernard J.-P., Bersanelli M., Bielewicz P., Bock J.J., Bond J.R., Borrill J., Bouchet F.R., Boulanger F., Bucher M., Burigana C., Butler R.C., Calabrese E., Cardoso J.-F., Carron J., Casaponsa B., Challinor A., Chiang H.C., Colombo L.P.L., Combet C., Contreras D., Crill B.P., Cuttaia F., De Bernardis P., De Zotti G., Delabrouille J., Delouis J.-M., Desert F.-X., Di Valentino E., Dickinson C., Diego J.M., Donzelli S., Dore O., Douspis M., Ducout A., Dupac X., Efstathiou G., Elsner F., Ensslin T.A., Eriksen H.K., Falgarone E., Fantaye Y., Fergusson J., Fernandez-Cobos R., Finelli F., Forastieri F., Frailis M., Franceschi E., Frolov A., Galeotta S., Galli S., Ganga K., Genova-Santos R.T., Gerbino M., Ghosh T., Gonzalez-Nuevo J., Gorski K.M., Gratton S., Gruppuso A., Gudmundsson J.E., Hamann J., Handley W., Hansen F.K., Helou G., Herranz D., Hildebrandt S.R., Hivon E., Huang Z., Jaffe A.H., Jones W.C., Karakci A., Keihanen E., Keskitalo R., Kiiveri K., Kim J., Kisner T.S., Knox L., Krachmalnicoff N., Kunz M., Kurki-Suonio H., Lagache G., Lamarre J.-M., Langer M., Lasenby A., Lattanzi M., Lawrence C.R., Le Jeune M., Leahy J.P., Lesgourgues J., Levrier F., Lewis A., Liguori M., Lilje P.B., Lilley M., Lindholm V., Lopez-Caniego M., Lubin P.M., Ma Y.-Z., Macias-Perez J.F., Maggio G., Maino D., Mandolesi N., Mangilli A., Marcos-Caballero A., Maris M., Martin P.G., Martinelli M., Martinez-Gonzalez E., Matarrese S., Mauri N., McEwen J.D., Meerburg P.D., Meinhold P.R., Melchiorri A., Mennella A., Migliaccio M., Millea M., Mitra S., Miville-Deschenes M.-A., Molinari D., Moneti A., Montier L., Morgante G., Moss A., Mottet S., Munchmeyer M., Natoli P., Norgaard-Nielsen H.U., Oxborrow C.A., Pagano L., Paoletti D., Partridge B., Patanchon G., Pearson T.J., Peel M., Peiris H.V., Perrotta F., Pettorino V., Piacentini F., Polastri L., Polenta G., Puget J.-L., Rachen J.P., Reinecke M., Remazeilles M., Renault C., Renzi A., Rocha G., Rosset C., Roudier G., Rubino-Martin J.A., Ruiz-Granados B., Salvati L., Sandri M., Savelainen M., Scott D., Shellard E.P.S., Shiraishi M., Sirignano C., Sirri G., Spencer L.D., Sunyaev R., Suur-Uski A.-S., Tauber J.A., Tavagnacco D., Tenti M., Terenzi L., Toffolatti L., Tomasi M., Trombetti T., Valiviita J., Van Tent B., Vibert L., Vielva P., Villa F., Vittorio N., Wandelt B.D., Wehus I.K., White M., White S.D.M., Zacchei A., Zonca A., Van Swinderen Institute for Particle Physics and G, High-Energy Frontier, Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National d’Études Spatiales [Paris] (CNES), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Département de Physique de l'ENS-PSL, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Département de Physique de l'ENS-PSL, Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Università degli studi di Parma = University of Parma (UNIPR), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' = Sapienza University [Rome] (UNIROMA), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Météo-France -Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Météo-France, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Università degli Studi di Padova = University of Padua (Unipd), Astrophysique Interprétation Modélisation (AIM (UMR7158 / UMR_E_9005 / UM_112)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University (PSL)-PSL Research University (PSL)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de physique de l'ENS - ENS Paris (LPENS (UMR_8023)), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), Challinor, Anthony [0000-0003-3479-7823], Fergusson, James [0000-0003-4820-171X], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
Cosmic background radiation, Cosmology: observations, Cosmology: theory, Surveys, cosmological model, Cosmic background radiation, Cosmology: observations, Cosmology: theory, Surveys, Astronomy, Cosmic microwave background, cosmic background radiation: polarization, Astrophysics, 01 natural sciences, 7. Clean energy, Cosmology: observation, redshift: low, RADIAÇÃO DE FUNDO, LENSING TOMOGRAPHY, observations [Cosmology], 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, media_common, Physics, Polarization (waves), MULTIBAND IMAGING PHOTOMETER, symbols, astro-ph.CO, power spectrum: angular dependence, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics and Astronomy, Structure formation, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), COMPONENT SEPARATION, satellite: Planck, ANGULAR POWER SPECTRUM, PARAMETER CONSTRAINTS, media_common.quotation_subject, FOS: Physical sciences, Lambda-CDM model, MAIN GALAXY SAMPLE, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Radio spectrum, microwaves, NO, symbols.namesake, Settore FIS/05 - Astronomia e Astrofisica, theory [Cosmology], 0103 physical sciences, detector: pixel, Planck, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 115 Astronomy, Space science, Redshift, cosmic background radiation: temperature, Space and Planetary Science, Sky, PROBE WMAP OBSERVATIONS, DARK ENERGY, [PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], MICROWAVE BACKGROUND POLARIZATION, BARYON ACOUSTIC-OSCILLATIONS
Abstract

Planck Collaboration: et al., arXiv:1807.06205v2, The European Space Agency’s Planck satellite, which was dedicated to studying the early Universe and its subsequent evolution, was launched on 14 May 2009. It scanned the microwave and submillimetre sky continuously between 12 August 2009 and 23 October 2013, producing deep, high-resolution, all-sky maps in nine frequency bands from 30 to 857 GHz. This paper presents the cosmological legacy of Planck, which currently provides our strongest constraints on the parameters of the standard cosmological model and some of the tightest limits available on deviations from that model. The 6-parameter ΛCDM model continues to provide an excellent fit to the cosmic microwave background data at high and low redshift, describing the cosmological information in over a billion map pixels with just six parameters. With 18 peaks in the temperature and polarization angular power spectra constrained well, Planck measures five of the six parameters to better than 1% (simultaneously), with the best-determined parameter (θ*) now known to 0.03%. We describe the multi-component sky as seen by Planck, the success of the ΛCDM model, and the connection to lower-redshift probes of structure formation. We also give a comprehensive summary of the major changes introduced in this 2018 release. The Planck data, alone and in combination with other probes, provide stringent constraints on our models of the early Universe and the large-scale structure within which all astrophysical objects form and evolve. We discuss some lessons learned from the Planck mission, and highlight areas ripe for further experimental advances., The development of Planck has been supported by: ESA; CNES and CNRS/INSU-IN2P3-INP (France); ASI, CNR, and INAF (Italy); NASA and DoE (USA); STFC and UKSA (UK); CSIC, MICINN, JA, and RES (Spain); Tekes, AoF, and CSC (Finland); DLR and MPG (Germany); CSA (Canada); DTU Space (Denmark); SER/SSO (Switzerland); RCN (Norway); SFI (Ireland); FCT/MCTES (Portugal); and PRACE (EU).

Published
2020

7. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

Author

M. López-Caniego, Richard A. Battye, Hannu Kurki-Suonio, J. Aumont, Charles R. Lawrence, P. Vielva, E. Martínez-González, François R. Bouchet, L. Montier, K. Ganga, Francesca Perrotta, Lloyd Knox, M. Le Jeune, Jan Hamann, E. Franceschi, M. Tenti, C. Combet, Torsten A. Enßlin, Andrea Zacchei, R. A. Sunyaev, J.-M. Delouis, J. F. Macías-Pérez, Tiziana Trombetti, Zhiqi Huang, Graca Rocha, L. Polastri, Alessandro Melchiorri, A. Mennella, Nabila Aghanim, Sabino Matarrese, Jose Alberto Rubino-Martin, N. Bartolo, Theodore Kisner, Peter Meinhold, L. Salvati, Jose M. Diego, K. Benabed, J.-P. Bernard, J. González-Nuevo, M. Ashdown, H. K. Eriksen, Erminia Calabrese, Olivier Doré, Serge Gratton, G. de Zotti, L. Vibert, J. R. Bond, Marzieh Farhang, Benjamin D. Wandelt, Julian Borrill, L. Toffolatti, F. Piacentini, Yin-Zhe Ma, Will Handley, S. Galeotta, A. Karakci, A. A. Fraisse, Anthony Lasenby, M. Sandri, X. Dupac, G. Sirri, Adam Moss, B. Ruiz-Granados, D. Contreras, A.-S. Suur-Uski, Mario G. Lattanzi, Ricardo Genova-Santos, Jean-François Cardoso, Marian Douspis, G. Polenta, E. Keihänen, A. J. Banday, M. Migliaccio, R. B. Barreiro, B. P. Crill, J. Valiviita, Yabebal Fantaye, B. Van Tent, Tuhin Ghosh, D. Tavagnacco, A. Renzi, Martin White, M. Bucher, Douglas Scott, Jörg P. Rachen, Hans Ulrik Nørgaard-Nielsen, Jason D. McEwen, R. C. Butler, Locke D. Spencer, Nicola Vittorio, V. Lindholm, Fabrizio Villa, K. Kiiveri, Ingunn Kathrine Wehus, Julien Lesgourgues, Hiranya V. Peiris, Reijo Keskitalo, Krzysztof M. Gorski, S. R. Hildebrandt, E. Di Valentino, A. Marcos-Caballero, G. Patanchon, P. de Bernardis, M. Lilley, Simon D. M. White, C. Sirignano, M. Frailis, Carlo Baccigalupi, Francesco Forastieri, W. C. Jones, P. Lemos, François Levrier, E. Hivon, R. Fernandez-Cobos, Carlo Burigana, Nicoletta Krachmalnicoff, D. Herranz, Andrei V. Frolov, M. Tomasi, Marius Millea, J.-L. Puget, Paolo Natoli, James R. Fergusson, D. Paoletti, L. Pagano, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes, Julien Carron, Luca Valenziano, F. K. Hansen, S. Dusini, Andrea Zonca, Bruce Partridge, Jens Chluba, S. Basak, H. C. Chiang, Alessandro Gruppuso, Marco Bersanelli, Peter G. Martin, Martin Kunz, Valeria Pettorino, Mathieu Remazeilles, Jacques Delabrouille, Jon E. Gudmundsson, J.-M. Lamarre, P. Bielewicz, F. Cuttaia, Franz Elsner, G. Roudier, S. Galli, Michele Liguori, Gianluca Morgante, A. Ducout, Fabio Finelli, James J. Bock, M. Reinecke, C. Rosset, Yashar Akrami, Anthony Challinor, Subhabrata Mitra, J. A. Tauber, Matteo Martinelli, M. Savelainen, N. Mauri, E. P. S. Shellard, Antony Lewis, Diego Molinari, G. Maggio, P. B. Lilje, Davide Maino, A. Mangilli, L. P. L. Colombo, Mario Ballardini, N. Mandolesi, Andrew H. Jaffe, Philip Lubin, J. Kim, M. Maris, Martina Gerbino, George Efstathiou, F. Boulanger, Guilaine Lagache, Challinor, Anthony [0000-0003-3479-7823], Fergusson, James [0000-0003-4820-171X], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Institut d'astrophysique spatiale (IAS), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de recherche en astrophysique et planétologie (IRAP), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris (IAP), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire d'Etude du Rayonnement et de la Matière en Astrophysique (LERMA (UMR_8112)), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University (PSL)-PSL Research University (PSL)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), AstroParticule et Cosmologie (APC (UMR_7164)), Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University (PSL)-PSL Research University (PSL)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie (LPSC), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Institut Polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES), Institut Lagrange de Paris, Sorbonne Universités, Astrophysique Interprétation Modélisation (AIM (UMR_7158 / UMR_E_9005 / UM_112)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de Physique Théorique d'Orsay [Orsay] (LPT), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Planck, Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National d’Études Spatiales [Paris] (CNES), Astrophysique, Laboratoire de physique de l'ENS - ENS Paris (LPENS), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Département de Physique de l'ENS-PSL, École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité)-Département de Physique de l'ENS-PSL, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université de Toulouse (UT)-Université de Toulouse (UT)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Météo-France -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Computing and Mathematical Sciences [Pasadena]], California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics (CITA), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [Berkeley] (LBNL), Laboratoire d'Etude du Rayonnement et de la Matière en Astrophysique (LERMA), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA)-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology (Grenoble INP ), Université Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Dipartimento di Fisica [Roma La Sapienza], Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' = Sapienza University [Rome] (UNIROMA), Laboratoire d'Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), NASA-California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie (MPIA), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Dipartimento di Fisica 'G. Galilei', Università degli Studi di Padova = University of Padua (Unipd), Astrophysique Interprétation Modélisation (AIM (UMR7158 / UMR_E_9005 / UM_112)), University College of London [London] (UCL), University of Manchester [Manchester], University of British Columbia (UBC), Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (IJCLab), Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 725456, CMBSPEC)., Planck Collaboration, European Project: 616170,EC:FP7:ERC,ERC-2013-CoG,COSMOPARS(2014), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées (OMP), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Météo France-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Météo France-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....] (UGA [2020-....])-Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology [2020-....] (Grenoble INP [2020-....]), Université Grenoble Alpes [2020-....] (UGA [2020-....]), Sorbonne Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11), Laboratoire de physique de l'ENS - ENS Paris (LPENS (UMR_8023)), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Météo France-Centre National d'Études Spatiales [Toulouse] (CNES)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Università degli Studi di Roma 'La Sapienza' = Sapienza University [Rome], Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD)-Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (IFREMER)-Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Cergy Pontoise (UCP), Université Paris-Seine-Université Paris-Seine-Observatoire de Paris, Universita degli Studi di Padova, Sorbonne Université (SU), Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), Science and Technology Facilities Council, Universidad de Cantabria, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (España), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España), European Commission, European Research Council, European Space Agency, Department of Physics, Helsinki Institute of Physics, Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des Particules du CNRS (IN2P3)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University (PSL)-PSL Research University (PSL)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Paris (UP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Aghanim N., Akrami Y., Ashdown M., Aumont J., Baccigalupi C., Ballardini M., Banday A.J., Barreiro R.B., Bartolo N., Basak S., Battye R., Benabed K., Bernard J.-P., Bersanelli M., Bielewicz P., Bock J.J., Bond J.R., Borrill J., Bouchet F.R., Boulanger F., Bucher M., Burigana C., Butler R.C., Calabrese E., Cardoso J.-F., Carron J., Challinor A., Chiang H.C., Chluba J., Colombo L.P.L., Combet C., Contreras D., Crill B.P., Cuttaia F., De Bernardis P., De Zotti G., Delabrouille J., Delouis J.-M., Di Valentino E., Diego J.M., Dore O., Douspis M., Ducout A., Dupac X., Dusini S., Efstathiou G., Elsner F., Ensslin T.A., Eriksen H.K., Fantaye Y., Farhang M., Fergusson J., Fernandez-Cobos R., Finelli F., Forastieri F., Frailis M., Fraisse A.A., Franceschi E., Frolov A., Galeotta S., Galli S., Ganga K., Genova-Santos R.T., Gerbino M., Ghosh T., Gonzalez-Nuevo J., Gorski K.M., Gratton S., Gruppuso A., Gudmundsson J.E., Hamann J., Handley W., Hansen F.K., Herranz D., Hildebrandt S.R., Hivon E., Huang Z., Jaffe A.H., Jones W.C., Karakci A., Keihanen E., Keskitalo R., Kiiveri K., Kim J., Kisner T.S., Knox L., Krachmalnicoff N., Kunz M., Kurki-Suonio H., Lagache G., Lamarre J.-M., Lasenby A., Lattanzi M., Lawrence C.R., Le Jeune M., Lemos P., Lesgourgues J., Levrier F., Lewis A., Liguori M., Lilje P.B., Lilley M., Lindholm V., Lopez-Caniego M., Lubin P.M., Ma Y.-Z., Macias-Perez J.F., Maggio G., Maino D., Mandolesi N., Mangilli A., Marcos-Caballero A., Maris M., Martin P.G., Martinelli M., Martinez-Gonzalez E., Matarrese S., Mauri N., McEwen J.D., Meinhold P.R., Melchiorri A., Mennella A., Migliaccio M., Millea M., Mitra S., Miville-Deschenes M.-A., Molinari D., Montier L., Morgante G., Moss A., Natoli P., Norgaard-Nielsen H.U., Pagano L., Paoletti D., Partridge B., Patanchon G., Peiris H.V., Perrotta F., Pettorino V., Piacentini F., Polastri L., Polenta G., Puget J.-L., Rachen J.P., Reinecke M., Remazeilles M., Renzi A., Rocha G., Rosset C., Roudier G., Rubino-Martin J.A., Ruiz-Granados B., Salvati L., Sandri M., Savelainen M., Scott D., Shellard E.P.S., Sirignano C., Sirri G., Spencer L.D., Sunyaev R., Suur-Uski A.-S., Tauber J.A., Tavagnacco D., Tenti M., Toffolatti L., Tomasi M., Trombetti T., Valenziano L., Valiviita J., Van Tent B., Vibert L., Vielva P., Villa F., Vittorio N., Wandelt B.D., Wehus I.K., White M., White S.D.M., Zacchei A., and Zonca A.

Subjects
cosmological model, Astronomy, Cosmic microwave background, INFLATIONARY PARADIGM, cosmic background radiation: polarization, Astrophysics, cosmic background radiation, baryon: oscillation: acoustic, 01 natural sciences, 7. Clean energy, Omega, Cosmology, OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY, background: geometry, GALAXY REDSHIFT SURVEY, neutrino: mass, dark energy, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, matter: density, expansion: adiabatic, Physics, Spectral index, cosmological constant, Hubble constant, Settore FIS/05, Cosmic background radiation, Cosmological parameters, ACCURATE HALO-MODEL, statistical analysis: Bayesian, POWER-SPECTRUM, matter: fluctuation, tension, perturbation: scalar, Physical Sciences, symbols, astro-ph.CO, Neutrino, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Particle physics, data analysis method, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), satellite: Planck, Dark matter, FOS: Physical sciences, cosmic background radiation: spectrum, dark matter: density, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, Astronomy & Astrophysics, NO, symbols.namesake, power spectrum: scalar, Settore FIS/05 - Astronomia e Astrofisica, gravitation: lens, 0103 physical sciences, 0201 Astronomical and Space Sciences, Planck, cosmological parameters, Astrophysics::Galaxy Astrophysics, Science & Technology, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, baryon: density, Astronomy and Astrophysics, GROWTH-RATE, stability, 115 Astronomy, Space science, cosmic background radiation: temperature, MICROWAVE BACKGROUND ANISOTROPIES, 13. Climate action, Space and Planetary Science, Cosmic background radiation, Cosmological parameters, PROBE WMAP OBSERVATIONS, [PHYS.ASTR]Physics [physics]/Astrophysics [astro-ph], BARYON ACOUSTIC-OSCILLATIONS, Hubble's law, cosmic background radiation: anisotropy
Abstract

Planck Collaboration: et al., arXiv:1807.06209v3, We present cosmological parameter results from the final full-mission Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies, combining information from the temperature and polarization maps and the lensing reconstruction. Compared to the 2015 results, improved measurements of large-scale polarization allow the reionization optical depth to be measured with higher precision, leading to significant gains in the precision of other correlated parameters. Improved modelling of the small-scale polarization leads to more robust constraints on many parameters, with residual modelling uncertainties estimated to affect them only at the 0.5σ level. We find good consistency with the standard spatially-flat 6-parameter ΛCDM cosmology having a power-law spectrum of adiabatic scalar perturbations (denoted “base ΛCDM” in this paper), from polarization, temperature, and lensing, separately and in combination. A combined analysis gives dark matter density Ωch2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, baryon density Ωbh2 = 0.0224 ± 0.0001, scalar spectral index ns = 0.965 ± 0.004, and optical depth τ = 0.054 ± 0.007 (in this abstract we quote 68% confidence regions on measured parameters and 95% on upper limits). The angular acoustic scale is measured to 0.03% precision, with 100θ* = 1.0411 ± 0.0003. These results are only weakly dependent on the cosmological model and remain stable, with somewhat increased errors, in many commonly considered extensions. Assuming the base-ΛCDM cosmology, the inferred (model-dependent) late-Universe parameters are: Hubble constant H0 = (67.4 ± 0.5) km s−1 Mpc−1; matter density parameter Ωm = 0.315 ± 0.007; and matter fluctuation amplitude σ8 = 0.811 ± 0.006. We find no compelling evidence for extensions to the base-ΛCDM model. Combining with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements (and considering single-parameter extensions) we constrain the effective extra relativistic degrees of freedom to be Neff = 2.99 ± 0.17, in agreement with the Standard Model prediction Neff = 3.046, and find that the neutrino mass is tightly constrained to ∑mν < 0.12 eV. The CMB spectra continue to prefer higher lensing amplitudes than predicted in base ΛCDM at over 2σ, which pulls some parameters that affect the lensing amplitude away from the ΛCDM model; however, this is not supported by the lensing reconstruction or (in models that also change the background geometry) BAO data. The joint constraint with BAO measurements on spatial curvature is consistent with a flat universe, ΩK = 0.001 ± 0.002. Also combining with Type Ia supernovae (SNe), the dark-energy equation of state parameter is measured to be w0 = −1.03 ± 0.03, consistent with a cosmological constant. We find no evidence for deviations from a purely power-law primordial spectrum, and combining with data from BAO, BICEP2, and Keck Array data, we place a limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r0.002 < 0.06. Standard big-bang nucleosynthesis predictions for the helium and deuterium abundances for the base-ΛCDM cosmology are in excellent agreement with observations. The Planck base-ΛCDM results are in good agreement with BAO, SNe, and some galaxy lensing observations, but in slight tension with the Dark Energy Survey’s combined-probe results including galaxy clustering (which prefers lower fluctuation amplitudes or matter density parameters), and in significant, 3.6σ, tension with local measurements of the Hubble constant (which prefer a higher value). Simple model extensions that can partially resolve these tensions are not favoured by the Planck data., The Planck Collaboration acknowledges the support of: ESA; CNES, and CNRS/INSU-IN2P3-INP (France); ASI, CNR, and INAF (Italy); NASA and DoE (USA); STFC and UKSA (UK); CSIC, MINECO, JA, and RES (Spain); Tekes, AoF, and CSC (Finland); DLR and MPG (Germany); CSA (Canada); DTU Space (Denmark); SER/SSO (Switzerland); RCN (Norway); SFI (Ireland); FCT/MCTES (Portugal); ERC and PRACE (EU).

Published
2020

8. Bayesian sparse reconstruction: a brute-force approach to astronomical imaging and machine learning

Author

Anthony Lasenby, Will Handley, Edward Higson, Michael P. Hobson, Higson, Edward [0000-0001-8383-4614], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Service (systems architecture), Higher education, Bayesian probability, FOS: Physical sciences, Machine Learning (stat.ML), 01 natural sciences, Methodology (stat.ME), 010104 statistics & probability, Statistics - Machine Learning, Brute force, 0103 physical sciences, ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION, 0101 mathematics, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Statistics - Methodology, Physics, business.industry, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supercomputer, stat.ML, Data science, Work (electrical), stat.ME, Space and Planetary Science, Darwin (ADL), Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, business, Astronomical imaging, astro-ph.IM
Abstract

We present a principled Bayesian framework for signal reconstruction, in which the signal is modelled by basis functions whose number (and form, if required) is determined by the data themselves. This approach is based on a Bayesian interpretation of conventional sparse reconstruction and regularisation techniques, in which sparsity is imposed through priors via Bayesian model selection. We demonstrate our method for noisy 1- and 2-dimensional signals, including astronomical images. Furthermore, by using a product-space approach, the number and type of basis functions can be treated as integer parameters and their posterior distributions sampled directly. We show that order-of-magnitude increases in computational efficiency are possible from this technique compared to calculating the Bayesian evidences separately, and that further computational gains are possible using it in combination with dynamic nested sampling. Our approach can also be readily applied to neural networks, where it allows the network architecture to be determined by the data in a principled Bayesian manner by treating the number of nodes and hidden layers as parameters., This work was performed using the Darwin Supercomputer of the University of Cambridge High Performance Computing Service (http://www.hpc.cam.ac.uk/), provided by Dell Inc. using Strategic Research Infrastructure Funding from the Higher Education Funding Council for England and funding from the Science and Technology Facilities Council.

Published
2018

9. Towards a framework for testing general relativity with extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral observations

Author

Michael P. Hobson, Jonathan R. Gair, Anthony Lasenby, Alvin J. K. Chua, Sonke Hee, Christopher J. Moore, Will Handley, Edward Higson, Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Higson, Edward [0000-0001-8383-4614], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
General relativity, gr-qc, FOS: Physical sciences, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc), 01 natural sciences, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, symbols.namesake, Theory of relativity, Tests of general relativity, 0103 physical sciences, 010306 general physics, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), Nested sampling algorithm, Physics, High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE), astro-ph.HE, methods: statistical, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Gravitational wave, Model selection, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Markov chain Monte Carlo, methods: data analysis, LIGO, gravitational waves, Space and Planetary Science, symbols, Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Algorithm, astro-ph.IM
Abstract

Extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral observations from future space-based gravitational-wave detectors such as LISA will enable strong-field tests of general relativity with unprecedented precision, but at prohibitive computational cost if existing statistical techniques are used. In one such test that is currently employed for LIGO black-hole binary mergers, generic deviations from relativity are represented by $N$ deformation parameters in a generalised waveform model; the Bayesian evidence for each of its $2^N$ combinatorial submodels is then combined into a posterior odds ratio for modified gravity over relativity in a null-hypothesis test. We adapt and apply this test to a generalised model for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals constructed on deformed black-hole spacetimes, and focus our investigation on how computational efficiency can be increased through an evidence-free method of model selection. This method is akin to the algorithm known as product-space Markov chain Monte Carlo, but uses nested sampling and improved error estimates from a rethreading technique. We perform benchmarking and robustness checks for the method, and find order-of-magnitude computational gains over regular nested sampling in the case of synthetic data generated from the null model., Published version

Published
2018

10. nestcheck: diagnostic tests for nested sampling calculations

Author

Michael P. Hobson, Anthony Lasenby, Will Handley, Edward Higson, Higson, Edward [0000-0001-8383-4614], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), Computation, Bayesian probability, FOS: Physical sciences, computer.software_genre, 01 natural sciences, Statistics - Computation, physics.data-an, Software, 0103 physical sciences, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Computation (stat.CO), Nested sampling algorithm, computer.programming_language, Physics, stat.CO, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Estimation theory, business.industry, Diagnostic test, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Probability and statistics, Python (programming language), Space and Planetary Science, Physics - Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability, astro-ph.CO, Data mining, business, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, computer, Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an), astro-ph.IM, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract

Nested sampling is an increasingly popular technique for Bayesian computation, in particular for multimodal, degenerate problems of moderate to high dimensionality. Without appropriate settings, however, nested sampling software may fail to explore such posteriors correctly; for example producing correlated samples or missing important modes. This paper introduces new diagnostic tests to assess the reliability both of parameter estimation and evidence calculations using nested sampling software, and demonstrates them empirically. We present two new diagnostic plots for nested sampling, and give practical advice for nested sampling software users in astronomy and beyond. Our diagnostic tests and diagrams are implemented in nestcheck: a publicly available Python package for analysing nested sampling calculations, which is compatible with output from MultiNest, PolyChord and dyPolyChord., Minor updates and improvements to text. Added extra figure. 12 pages + appendix, 15 figures

Published
2018

11. Exploring cosmic origins with CORE: Gravitational lensing of the CMB

Author

Challinor, A, Allison, R, Carron, J, Errard, J, Feeney, S, Kitching, T, Lesgourgues, J, Lewis, A, Zubeldia, I, Achucarro, A, Ade, P, Ashdown, M, Ballardini, M, Banday, AJ, Banerji, R, Bartlett, J, Bartolo, N, Basak, S, Baumann, D, Bersanelli, M, Bonaldi, A, Bonato, M, Borrill, J, Bouchet, F, Boulanger, F, Brinckmann, T, Bucher, M, Burigana, C, Buzzelli, A, Cai, ZY, Calvo, M, Carvalho, CS, Castellano, G, Chluba, J, Clesse, S, Colantoni, I, Coppolecchia, A, Crook, M, D'Alessandro, G, De Bernardis, P, De Gasperis, G, Zotti, GD, Delabrouille, J, Valentino, ED, Diego, JM, Fernandez-Cobos, R, Ferraro, S, Finelli, F, Forastieri, F, Galli, S, Genova-Santos, R, Gerbino, M, González-Nuevo, J, Grandis, S, Greenslade, J, Hagstotz, S, Hanany, S, Handley, W, Hernandez-Monteagudo, C, Hervias-Caimapo, C, Hills, M, Hivon, E, Kiiveri, K, Kisner, T, Kunz, M, Kurki-Suonio, H, Lamagna, L, Lasenby, A, Lattanzi, M, Liguori, M, Lindholm, V, López-Caniego, M, Luzzi, G, Maffei, B, Martinez-González, E, Martins, CJAP, Masi, S, Matarrese, S, McCarthy, D, Melchiorri, A, Melin, JB, Molinari, D, Monfardini, A, Natoli, P, Negrello, M, Notari, A, Paiella, A, Paoletti, D, Patanchon, G, Piat, M, Pisano, G, Polastri, L, Polenta, G, Pollo, A, Poulin, V, Quartin, M, Remazeilles, M, Roman, M, Rubino-Martin, JA, Salvati, L, Challinor, Anthony [0000-0003-3479-7823], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
CMBR polarisation, Particle and Plasma Physics, gravitational lensing, astro-ph.CO, Molecular, Nuclear, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, neutrino masses from cosmology, inflation, Nuclear & Particles Physics, Atomic, Astronomical and Space Sciences
Abstract

Lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) is now a well-developed probe of the clustering of the large-scale mass distribution over a broad range of redshifts. By exploiting the non-Gaussian imprints of lensing in the polarization of the CMB, the CORE mission will allow production of a clean map of the lensing deflections over nearly the full-sky. The number of high-S/N modes in this map will exceed current CMB lensing maps by a factor of 40, and the measurement will be sample-variance limited on all scales where linear theory is valid. Here, we summarise this mission product and discuss the science that will follow from its power spectrum and the cross-correlation with other clustering data. For example, the summed mass of neutrinos will be determined to an accuracy of 17 meV combining CORE lensing and CMB two-point information with contemporaneous measurements of the baryon acoustic oscillation feature in the clustering of galaxies, three times smaller than the minimum total mass allowed by neutrino oscillation measurements. Lensing has applications across many other science goals of CORE, including the search for B-mode polarization from primordial gravitational waves. Here, lens-induced B-modes will dominate over instrument noise, limiting constraints on the power spectrum amplitude of primordial gravitational waves. With lensing reconstructed by CORE, one can "delens" the observed polarization internally, reducing the lensing B-mode power by 60 %. This can be improved to 70 % by combining lensing and measurements of the cosmic infrared background from CORE, leading to an improvement of a factor of 2.5 in the error on the amplitude of primordial gravitational waves compared to no delensing (in the null hypothesis of no primordial B-modes). Lensing measurements from CORE will allow calibration of the halo masses of the tens of thousands of galaxy clusters that it will find, with constraints dominated by the clean polarization-based estimators. The 19 frequency channels proposed for CORE will allow accurate removal of Galactic emission from CMB maps. We present initial findings that show that residual Galactic foreground contamination will not be a significant source of bias for lensing power spectrum measurements with CORE.

Published
2018

12. On the Feasibility of Intense Radial Velocity Surveys for Earth-twin Discoveries

Author

Will Handley, Didier Queloz, Samantha Thompson, Richard D. Hall, Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Queloz, Didier [0000-0002-3012-0316], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP), Physics, methods: statistical, planets and satellites: detection, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, FOS: Physical sciences, Astronomy, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 01 natural sciences, methods: data analysis, Methods statistical, Radial velocity, 13. Climate action, Space and Planetary Science, Sun: activity, 0103 physical sciences, techniques: radial velocities, stars: activity, Astrophysics::Earth and Planetary Astrophysics, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Astrophysics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Abstract

This work assesses the potential capability of the next generation of high-precision Radial Velocity (RV) instruments for Earth-twin exoplanet detection. From the perspective of the importance of data sampling, the Terra Hunting Experiment aims to do this through an intense series of nightly RV observations over a long baseline on a carefully selected target list, via the brand-new instrument HARPS3. This paper describes an end-to-end simulation of generating and processing such data to help us better understand the impact of uncharacterised stellar noise in the recovery of Earth-mass planets with orbital periods of the order of many months. We consider full Keplerian systems, realistic simulated stellar noise, instrument white noise, and location-specific weather patterns for our observation schedules. We use Bayesian statistics to assess various planetary models fitted to the synthetic data, and compare the successful planet recovery of the Terra Hunting Experiment schedule with a typical reference survey. We find that the Terra Hunting Experiment can detect Earth-twins in the habitable zones of solar-type stars, in single and multi-planet systems, and in the presence of stellar signals. Also that it out-performs a typical reference survey on accuracy of recovered parameters, and that it performs comparably to an uninterrupted space-based schedule., Comment: 22 pages, 13 figures

Published
2018

13. Sampling errors in nested sampling parameter estimation

Author

Anthony Lasenby, Will Handley, Edward Higson, Michael P. Hobson, Higson, Edward [0000-0001-8383-4614], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Statistics and Probability, FOS: Physical sciences, Slice sampling, nested sampling, 01 natural sciences, Statistics - Applications, Methodology (stat.ME), 010104 statistics & probability, Sampling design, Statistics, 0103 physical sciences, Applications (stat.AP), 0101 mathematics, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Nested sampling algorithm, Statistics - Methodology, Mathematics, Applied Mathematics, Sampling (statistics), Systematic sampling, Stratified sampling, Poisson sampling, Cluster sampling, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, parameter estimation
Abstract

Sampling errors in nested sampling parameter estimation differ from those in Bayesian evidence calculation, but have been little studied in the literature. This paper provides the first explanation of the two main sources of sampling errors in nested sampling parameter estimation, and presents a new diagrammatic representation for the process. We find no current method can accurately measure the parameter estimation errors of a single nested sampling run, and propose a method for doing so using a new algorithm for dividing nested sampling runs. We empirically verify our conclusions and the accuracy of our new method., Very minor changes. 22 pages + appendix, 10 figures. Accepted by Bayesian Analysis

Published
2018

14. AMI observations of 10 CLASH galaxy clusters: SZ and X-ray data used together to determine cluster dynamical states

Author

Michel P. Schammel, Farhan Feroz, Will Handley, Keith Grainge, Michael P. Hobson, Clare Rumsey, Richard D. E. Saunders, Helen Russell, Yvette C. Perrott, Malak Olamaie, Rumsey, Clare [0000-0002-3936-2178], Perrott, Yvette Chanel [0000-0002-6255-8240], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Saunders, Richard [0000-0003-3167-5863], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
Physics, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Arcminute Microkelvin Imager, Small deviations, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Astrophysics, Collision, 01 natural sciences, Methods observational, Space and Planetary Science, techniques: interferometric, galaxies: clusters: general, 0103 physical sciences, Cluster (physics), X ray data, large-scale structure of Universe, methods: observational, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Scaling, Galaxy cluster
Abstract

© 2016 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.Using Arcminute Microkelvin Imager (AMI) Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) observations towards 10 CLASH (Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey with Hubble) clusters, we investigate the influence of cluster mergers on observational galaxy cluster studies. Although selected to be largely relaxed, there is disagreement in the literature on the dynamical states of CLASH sample members. We analyse ourAMIdata in a fully Bayesianway to produce estimated cluster parameters and consider the intrinsic correlations in our Navarro, Frenk and White/generalized Navarro, Frenk and White-based model. Varying pressure profile shape parameters, illustrating an influence of mergers on scaling relations, induces small deviations from the canonical selfsimilar predictions - in agreement with simulations of Poole et al. (2007) who found that merger activity causes only small scatter perpendicular to the relations. We demonstrate this effect observationally using the different dependences of SZ and X-ray signals to ne that cause different sensitivities to the shocking and/or fractionation produced by mergers. Plotting YX-Mgas relations (where YX = MgasT) derived from AMI SZ and from Chandra X-ray gives ratios of AMI and Chandra YX and Mgas estimates that indicate movement of clusters along the scaling relation, as predicted by Poole et al. (2007). Clusters that have moved most along the relation have the most discrepant TSZ and TX estimates: all the other clusters (apart from one) have SZ and X-ray estimates of Mgas, T and YX that agree within r500. We use SZ versus X-ray discrepancies in conjunction with Chandra maps and TX profiles, making comparisons with simulated cluster merger maps in Poole et al. (2006) to identify disturbed members of our sample and estimate merger stages.

Published
2016

15. Constraining the dark energy equation of state using Bayes theorem and the Kullback-Leibler divergence

Author

Michael P. Hobson, Will Handley, Anthony Lasenby, Jose Alberto Vazquez, Sonke Hee, Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Lasenby, Anthony [0000-0002-8208-6332], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
Kullback–Leibler divergence, Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO), Cosmic microwave background, Posterior probability, FOS: Physical sciences, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, 01 natural sciences, symbols.namesake, Theoretical physics, 0103 physical sciences, Prior probability, Planck, cosmological parameters, dark energy, 010303 astronomy & astrophysics, Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM), equation of state, Physics, methods: statistical, 010308 nuclear & particles physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Bayes factor, methods: data analysis, Redshift, Space and Planetary Science, symbols, Dark energy, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract

Data-driven model-independent reconstructions of the dark energy equation of state $w$($z$) are presented using $\textit{Planck}$ 2015 era cosmic microwave background, baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO), Type Ia supernova (SNIa) and Lyman $\alpha$ (Ly$\alpha$) data. These reconstructions identify the $w$($z$) behaviour supported by the data and show a bifurcation of the equation of state posterior in the range 1.5 < $z$ < 3. Although the concordance $\Lambda$ cold dark matter ($\Lambda$CDM) model is consistent with the data at all redshifts in one of the bifurcated spaces, in the other, a supernegative equation of state (also known as ‘phantom dark energy’) is identified within the 1.5$\sigma$ confidence intervals of the posterior distribution. To identify the power of different data sets in constraining the dark energy equation of state, we use a novel formulation of the Kullback–Leibler divergence. This formalism quantifies the information the data add when moving from priors to posteriors for each possible data set combination. The SNIa and BAO data sets are shown to provide much more constraining power in comparison to the Ly$\alpha$ data sets. Further, SNIa and BAO constrain most strongly around redshift range 0.1–0.5, whilst the Ly$\alpha$ data constrain weakly over a broader range. We do not attribute the supernegative favouring to any particular data set, and note that the $\Lambda$CDM model was favoured at more than 2 log-units in Bayes factors over all the models tested despite the weakly preferred $w$($z$) structure in the data., This work was performed using the Darwin Supercomputer of the University of Cambridge High Performance Computing Service (http://www.hpc.cam.ac.uk), provided by Dell Inc. using Strategic Research Infrastructure Funding from the Higher Education Funding Council for England and funding from the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC). Parts of this work were undertaken on the COSMOS Shared Memory system at DAMTP, University of Cambridge operated on behalf of the STFC DiRAC HPC Facility; this equipment is funded by BIS National E-infrastructure capital grant ST/J005673/1 and STFC grants ST/H008586/1, ST/K00333X/1. SH and WJH thank STFC for fi- nancial support.

Published
2016

16. Planck 2015 results: XX. Constraints on inflation

Author

Ade, PAR, Aghanim, N, Arnaud, M, Arroja, F, Ashdown, M, Aumont, J, Baccigalupi, C, Ballardini, M, Banday, AJ, Barreiro, RB, Bartolo, N, Battaner, E, Benabed, K, Benoît, A, Benoit-Lévy, A, Bernard, JP, Bersanelli, M, Bielewicz, P, Bock, JJ, Bonaldi, A, Bonavera, L, Bond, JR, Borrill, J, Bouchet, FR, Boulanger, F, Bucher, M, Burigana, C, Butler, RC, Calabrese, E, Cardoso, JF, Catalano, A, Challinor, A, Chamballu, A, Chary, RR, Chiang, HC, Christensen, PR, Church, S, Clements, DL, Colombi, S, Colombo, LPL, Combet, C, Contreras, D, Couchot, F, Coulais, A, Crill, BP, Curto, A, Cuttaia, F, Danese, L, Davies, RD, Davis, RJ, De Bernardis, P, De Rosa, A, De Zotti, G, Delabrouille, J, Désert, FX, Diego, JM, Dole, H, Donzelli, S, Doré, O, Douspis, M, Ducout, A, Dupac, X, Efstathiou, G, Elsner, F, Enßlin, TA, Eriksen, HK, Fergusson, J, Finelli, F, Forni, O, Frailis, M, Fraisse, AA, Franceschi, E, Frejsel, A, Frolov, A, Galeotta, S, Galli, S, Ganga, K, Gauthier, C, Giard, M, Giraud-Héraud, Y, Gjerløw, E, González-Nuevo, J, Górski, KM, Gratton, S, Gregorio, A, Gruppuso, A, Gudmundsson, JE, Hamann, J, Handley, W, Hansen, FK, Hanson, D, Harrison, DL, Henrot-Versillé, S, Hernández-Monteagudo, C, Herranz, D, Hildebrandt, SR, Hivon, E, Hobson, M, Holmes, WA, Hornstrup, A, Challinor, Anthony [0000-0003-3479-7823], Fergusson, James [0000-0003-4820-171X], Handley, William [0000-0002-5866-0445], Harrison, Diana [0000-0001-8687-6588], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository

Subjects
theory [cosmology], cosmology: theory, astro-ph.CO, Astrophysics::Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics, cosmic background radiation, Astronomy & Astrophysics, early Universe, inflation, Astronomical and Space Sciences
Abstract

We present the implications for cosmic inflation of the Planck measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies in both temperature and polarization based on the full Planck survey. The Planck full mission temperature data and a first release of polarization data on large angular scales measure the spectral index of curvature perturbations to be $n_\mathrm{s} = 0.968 \pm 0.006$ and tightly constrain its scale dependence to $d n_s/d \ln k =-0.003 \pm 0.007$ when combined with the Planck lensing likelihood. When the high-$\ell$ polarization data is included, the results are consistent and uncertainties are reduced. The upper bound on the tensor-to-scalar ratio is $r_{0.002} < 0.11$ (95% CL), consistent with the B-mode polarization constraint $r< 0.12$ (95% CL) obtained from a joint BICEP2/Keck Array and Planck analysis. These results imply that $V(\phi) \propto \phi^2$ and natural inflation are now disfavoured compared to models predicting a smaller tensor-to-scalar ratio, such as $R^2$ inflation. Three independent methods reconstructing the primordial power spectrum are investigated. The Planck data are consistent with adiabatic primordial perturbations. We investigate inflationary models producing an anisotropic modulation of the primordial curvature power spectrum as well as generalized models of inflation not governed by a scalar field with a canonical kinetic term. The 2015 results are consistent with the 2013 analysis based on the nominal mission data., Science and Technology Facilities Council, This is the author accepted manuscript. It is currently under an indefinite embargo pending publication by EDP Sciences

Published
2016

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results