Search

Background: As heart transplant guidelines evolve, the clinical indication for 73% of durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implants is now destination therapy. Although completely magnetically levitated LVAD devices have demonstrated improved durability relative to previous models, LVAD replacement procedures are still required for a variety of indications. Thus, the population of patients with a replaced LVAD is growing. There is a paucity of data regarding the outcomes and risk factors for those patients receiving first‐time LVAD replacements. Methods: The study cohort consisted of all consecutive patients between 2006 and 2020 that received a first‐time LVAD replacement at a single institution. Preoperative clinical and laboratory variables were collected retrospectively. The primary endpoint was death or need for an additional LVAD replacement. Data were subjected to Kaplan–Meier, univariate, and multivariate Cox hazard ratio analyses. Results: In total, 152 patients were included in the study, of which 101 experienced the primary endpoint. On multivariate analysis, patients receiving HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVADs as the replacement device showed superior outcomes (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.065–0.35, p < 0.0001). Independent risk factors for death or need for additional replacement included preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (HR 4.44, 95% CI 1.87–14.45, and p = 0.00042), increased number of sternotomies (HR 5.20, 95% CI 1.87–14.45, and p = 0.0016), and preoperative mechanical ventilation (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.01–3.86, and p = 0.045). Conclusions: Replacement with HM3 showed superior outcomes compared to all other pump types when controlling for both initial pump type and other independent predictors of death or LVAD replacement. Preoperative ECMO, mechanical ventilation, and multiple sternotomies also increased the odds for death or the need for subsequent replacement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Current treatment recommendations for patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation include transcatheter edge-to-edge repair and mitral-valve surgery. Data from randomized trials comparing these therapies are lacking in this patient population., Methods: In this noninferiority trial conducted in Germany, patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation who continued to have symptoms despite guideline-directed medical therapy were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo either transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (intervention group) or surgical mitral-valve repair or replacement (surgery group). The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, hospitalization for heart failure, mitral-valve reintervention, implantation of an assist device, or stroke within 1 year after the procedure. The primary safety end point was a composite of major adverse events within 30 days after the procedure., Results: A total of 210 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 70.5±7.9 years, 39.9% were women, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 43.0±11.7%. Within 1 year, at least one of the components of the primary efficacy end point occurred in 16 of the 96 patients with available data (16.7%) in the intervention group and in 20 of the 89 with available data (22.5%) in the surgery group (estimated mean difference, -6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17 to 6; P<0.001 for noninferiority). A primary safety end-point event occurred in 15 of the 101 patients with available data (14.9%) in the intervention group and in 51 of the 93 patients with available data (54.8%) in the surgery group (estimated mean difference, -40 percentage points; 95% CI, -51 to -27; P<0.001)., Conclusions: Among patients with heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair was noninferior to mitral-valve surgery with respect to a composite of death, rehospitalization for heart failure, stroke, reintervention, or implantation of an assist device in the left ventricle at 1 year. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; MATTERHORN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02371512.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

The Berlin Heart EXCOR is used in paediatric patients with ventricular failure for temporary support as a bridge to a cardiac transplant or, occasionally, as a bridge to ventricular recovery. Neonates, infants and children who are supported with ventricular assist devices while gaining weight also have an increased demand for cardiac output while supported. Some patients might need a few pump exchanges to meet circulatory needs while growing. In this case report, we present the step-by-step technique for exchanging and upsizing the Berlin Heart EXCOR single ventricle-ventricular assist device in a 5-kg baby., (© The Author 2024. Published by MMCTS on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the correlation between left ventricular assist device flow parameter and invasive cardiac output measurements., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated right heart catheterization examinations performed in left ventricular assist device patients from 2 tertiary medical centres. We evaluated the correlation between cardiac output measurement methods (indirect Fick and thermodilution) and pump flow parameter using linear regression, and the agreement was graphically displayed using Bland-Altman plot technique. Clinical, echocardiographic, pump and haemodynamic parameters were compared between patients with and without discordance, defined as at least a 20% difference between measurements., Results: The study population consisted of 102 patients [median age 58 (51-64), 86% males, 17 ± 12 months post left ventricular assist device implantation] with a total of 544 measurements compared. Discordance between measurements was present in 102 of 226 (45%) comparisons between indirect Fick and pump flow and in 72 of 161 (48%) between thermodilution and pump flow. A comparison of indirect Fick and left ventricular assist device exhibited a statistical correlation of R = 0.751, and that of thermodilution and left ventricular assist device of R = 0.789. Parameters associated with the presence of discordance between cardiac output measurements included a higher rate of aortic valve opening, lower indirect Fick and higher thermodilution cardiac output. After excluding the lowest tertile of indirect Fick cardiac output values, the correlation between measurements improved (thermodilution: R = 0.879 and indirect Fick: R = 0.843, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: The current left ventricular assist device flow parameter provides an estimation of cardiac output that correlates well with indirect Fick and exhibits the strongest correlation with thermodilution. This correlation was stronger after excluding lower cardiac output values., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: The study aimed to evaluate the changes of left ventricular diastolic function and the improvement of clinical symptoms in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) after percutaneous intramyocardial septal radiofrequency ablation (PIMSRA)., Methods: This study enrolled 31 adult HCM patients with HFpEF who underwent PIMSRA treatment. Electrocardiogram, imaging, and blood biochemical examinations were performed on these patients during a 6-month follow-up., Results: Compared with the baseline, at 6 months after PIMSRA, patients showed significant reductions in peak left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradients (resting gradient: from a mean of 83.24 to 23.40 mmHg, p < 0.001; postexercise gradient: from a mean of 109.70 to 33.39 mmHg, p< 0.001). The interventricular septal thickness reduced from a mean of 22.90 to 17.48 mm, p < 0.001. The E/e' decreased from a median of 18.67 to 11.54, p < 0.001. The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) increased from a mean of 359.03 to 435.81 m, p < 0.001. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ OS) increased from a mean of 57.57 to 71.93, p < 0.001. The number of HFpEF patients diagnosed according to the European Society of Cardiology's Heart Failure Association HFA-PEFF score decreased from 31 to 23. None of the patients had new-onset bundle branch block or complete heart block after PIMSRA., Conclusion: PIMSRA is a safe and effective treatment. It can improve left ventricular diastolic function and quality of life in HCM patients., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: In October 2018, the US heart transplant (HT) allocation system was revised giving patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) intermediate priority status. Few studies have examined the impact of this policy change on outcomes among patients with LVAD. We sought to determine how the allocation change impacted waitlist and posttransplant mortality in patients with LVAD., Methods: We retrospectively assessed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for patients with LVAD who were listed for or underwent HT between October 2016 and October 2021. We evaluated waitlist mortality using competing risks analysis and a multivariable Fine-Gray model, and posttransplant mortality using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate proportional hazards model., Results: We analyzed data from 3835 patients with LVAD listed for HT and 3486 patients with LVAD who underwent HT during the study period. Listing for HT preallocation change was significantly associated with an increased risk of waitlist mortality (Gray P =0.0058) compared with postallocation change. After adjustment for covariates, mortality differences by listing era were attenuated, but LVAD brand was significantly associated with waitlist mortality (HM3 versus HMII; hazard ratio, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.21-0.69]; P =0.002; HVAD versus HMII; hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.48-1.30]; P =0.36; overall P =0.004). In contrast, HT postallocation change was associated with increased posttransplant mortality (log-rank P =0.0172) compared with preallocation change. In a multivariable analysis, the association with posttransplant mortality between transplant eras was attenuated, but ischemic time (hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.07-1.26]; P <0.001) and status at time of HT (Status 1-3 versus 4; hazard ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.04-1.61]; P =0.02) were significantly associated with posttransplant mortality., Conclusions: Among patients with LVAD, lower waitlist mortality postallocation change was likely driven by improved LVAD technology. Higher posttransplant mortality following the allocation change was largely attributable to longer ischemic times and patient acuity., Competing Interests: Dr Pham serves as a consultant for Abbott, Abiomed, and Medtronic. Dr Wilcox serves as a consultant for Amgen and Abbott and is on the advisory board of Cytokinetics. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: The impact of continuous flow resulting from contemporary left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) on renal vascular physiology is unknown. Renal resistive index (RRI) reflects arterial compliance, as well as renal vascular resistance, contributed by afferent and efferent arteriolar tone, the renal interstitium as well as renal venous pressures., Methods: Prospective, single center study with renal Doppler evaluation at baseline (pre-implant) and at 3-months support. Outcomes assessed include need for post-operative renal replacement therapy (RRT), worsening renal function (WRF) defined as persistent increase from pre-implant KDIGO chronic kidney disease stage, right ventricular (RV) failure, and survival to transplantation., Results: Pre-implant RRI did not predict cardiorenal outcomes including right heart failure, need for renal replacement therapy or worsening renal function. Post-implant RRI was significantly lower than pre-implant RRI, with a distinct Doppler waveform characteristic of continuous flow. Post-implant renal end-diastolic velocity, but not RRI, correlated strongly with LVAD flow (Spearman rho -0.99, p < 0.001), with trend toward correlation with mean arterial pressure (Spearman's rho 0.63, p = 0.129). There was a negative correlation between post-implant RRI and mean pulmonary artery pressure (Spearman's rho -0.81, p = 0.049), likely driven by elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (Spearman's rho -0.83, p = 0.058)., Conclusion: The hemodynamic contributors to RRI in LVAD supported patients are complex. Higher mean pulmonary artery and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures seen in lower RRI may reflect a smaller difference in systolic and diastolic flow. Future simultaneous Doppler assessment of the LVAD outflow graft and RRI may help understand the hemodynamic interactions contributing to this index., (© 2024 International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

We studied the impact of the 2018 heart allocation policy change on donor characteristics and posttransplant outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-bridged heart transplant (HT) recipients. Left ventricular assist device-bridged adult HT recipients from October 2014 to October 2022 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were categorized into old allocation policy (OAP) and new allocation policy (NAP) cohorts. Baseline characteristics, posttransplant outcomes, and subgroup analyses of unstable and stable LVAD-bridged recipients were assessed. The study included 7,384 HT recipients; 4,345 (58.8%) were transplanted in the OAP era and 3,039 (41.2%) in the NAP era. Old allocation policy recipients were most frequently status 1A at transplantation (71.1%), whereas NAP recipients were most frequently status 3 (40.0%), and status 4 (31.9%). Median donor sequence number (DSN) was higher in the NAP versus OAP era (9 vs. 3, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, NAP recipients had 20% higher 1 year mortality compared to OAP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.04-1.40], p = 0.01). Status 1 or 2 recipients had 28% higher 1 year mortality compared to status 1A (aHR = 1.28 [95% CI: 1.01-1.63], p = 0.04). Status 1 and 2 LVAD-supported recipients had higher mortality following the 2018 allocation change, indicating the need for closer surveillance of LVAD-bridged patients who may decompensate on the waitlist., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

While notable improvements in survival, the incidence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events, hospitalizations, and cost have been demonstrated with the only commercially available durable left ventricular assist device, a category of pump malfunctions characterized by outflow graft obstruction has been noted with broader use and clinical follow-up of recipients of this technology. Of particular concern is the accumulation of acellular biodebris between the outflow graft and bend relief covering the outflow graft at its origin with the pump (which we term extrinsic outflow graft obstruction at the bend relief). This process tends to be insidious, occurs late in the postoperative course, can be challenging to diagnose, and can result in significant morbidity and mortality. Herein, we provide a review of this complication and outline diagnostic, treatment, and preventive strategies., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine if the intraoperative transfusion requirements differ based on the mechanical circulatory device used as a bridge to heart transplantation., Design: A single-center retrospective analysis of intraoperative transfusion requirements in all patients undergoing heart or heart/kidney transplantation between November 2018 and July 2021 who were bridged with a temporary (Impella 5.5) or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD)., Setting: A tertiary care hospital., Participants: Forty-three adult patients bridged to heart or heart/kidney transplantation with a temporary or durable LVAD between 2018 and 2021 INTERVENTIONS: Recording of baseline characteristics and intraoperative transfusion requirements, including packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, autologous blood salvage, and platelets. The difference in cardiopulmonary bypass times, intensive care unit length of stay, and the vasoactive inotrope score following transplantation were also recorded., Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the volume of blood products transfused intraoperatively. Patients who underwent bridge to transplantation using the Impella 5.5 had statistically significant lower median transfusions of cryoprecipitate (155 mL versus 200 mL, p = 0.015), autologous blood salvage (675 mL versus 1,125 mL, p ≤ 0.01), and platelets (412 mL versus 675 mL, p ≤ 0.01). Additionally, there was a trend toward lower transfusion of intraoperative packed red blood cells (4.5 units versus 6.5 units, p = 0.29) and fresh frozen plasma (675 mL versus 800 mL, p = 0.11), but these were not statistically significant., Conclusions: The results suggest a reduction in certain intraoperative transfusion requirements in patients undergoing heart transplantation bridged with the Impella 5.5 versus durable left ventricular assist device., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Martin serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Attgeno AB, with all compensation to Mayo Clinic. He also serves on the Data Safety Monitoring Board for the GLUSorb Trial (NCT05526950), with all compensation to Mayo Clinic. Dr. Goswami is a speaker for Abiomed., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Utilization of temporary mechanical circulatory support, including veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to heart transplantation (HT) has increased significantly under the revised United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) donor heart allocation system. The revised heart allocation system aimed to lower waitlist times and mortality for the most critically ill patients requiring biventricular, nondischargeable, mechanical circulatory support. While previous reports have shown improved 1-year post-HT survival in the current era, 3-year survival and factors associated with mortality among bridge-to-transplant (BTT) extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients are not well described., Methods: We queried the UNOS database for all adult (age ≥ 18 years) heart-only transplants performed between 2010 and 2019. Patients were stratified as either pre- (January 2010-September 2018; era 1) or post-allocation change (November 2018-December 2019; era 2) cohort based on their HT date. Baseline recipient characteristics and post-transplant outcomes were compared. A Cox regression analysis was performed to explore risk factors for 3-year mortality among BTT-ECMO patients in era 2. For each era, 3-year mortality was also compared between BTT ECMO patients and those transplanted without ECMO support., Results: During the study period, 116 patients were BTT ECMO during era 1 and 154 patients during era 2. Baseline recipient characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 48 (36-58 interquartile range (IQR)) years in era 2, while it was 51 (27-58 IQR) years in era 1. The majority of BTT-ECMO patients were males in both era 2 and era 1 (77.7% vs 71.5%, p = 0.28). Median ECMO run times while listed for HT were significantly shorter (4 days vs 7 days, p < 0.001) in era 2. Waitlist mortality among BTT ECMO patients was also significantly lower in era 2 (6.3% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001). Post-HT survival at 6 months (94.2% vs 75.9%, p < 0.001), 1 year (90.3% vs 74.2%, p < 0.001), and 3 years (87% vs 66.4%, p < 0.001) was significantly improved in era 2 as compared to era 1. Graft failure at 1 year (10.3% vs 25.8%, p = 0.0006) and 3 years (13.6% vs 33.6%, p = 0.0001) was also significantly lower in era 2 compared to era 1. Three-year survival among BTT ECMO patients in era 2 was similar to that of patients transplanted in era 2 without ECMO support (87% vs 85.7%, p = 0.75). In multivariable analysis of BTT-ECMO patients in era 2, every 1 kg/m 2 increase in body mass index was associated with higher mortality at 3 years (hazard ratio (HR) 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.15, p = 0.006). Similarly, both post-HT stroke (HR 5.58, 95% CI 2.57-12.14, p < 0.001) and post-HT renal failure requiring hemodialysis (HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.43-7.82, p < 0.001) were also associated with 3-year mortality., Conclusions: Three years post-HT survival in patients bridged with ECMO has significantly improved under the revised donor heart allocation system compared to prior system. BTT ECMO recipients under the revised system have significantly shorter ECMO waitlist run times, lower waitlist mortality and 3-year survival similar to those not bridged with ECMO. Overall, the revised allocation system has allowed more rapid transplantation of the sickest patients without a higher post-HT mortality., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients have substantial variability in perioperative outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant. A perioperative multidimensional tool integrating mortality, adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes to assist in quality improvement initiatives is needed., Methods: Patients undergoing HeartMate 3 LVAD implant (January 1, 2017 to January 31, 2024) in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' Intermacs registry were studied. Cox proportional hazard multivariable analyses incorporating AEs as time-varying covariates for mortality out to 180 days was used to generate the INtermacs Short term composITE quality score (INSITE score derivation), reflecting the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality contributed by each AE, applying the global ranking methodology. In those alive and on support at 6 months, multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio) was used to examine the impact of AEs on health-related quality of life (QOL) at 180 days, captured through the INSITE-QOL score. Failure to achieve ≥1 point increase in visual analog scale from baseline was the event., Results: Of 13,148 patients, 4,389 (33.4%) suffered at least 1 AE or death through 180 days. Stroke (survival: HR 13.1; QOL: HR 1.7), dialysis (survival: HR 31.4; QOL: HR 4.2), prolonged respiratory failure (survival: HR 5.7; QOL: HR 2.3), reoperation (survival: HR 3.4; QOL: HR 1.6), and right heart failure (survival: 5.0; QOL: HR 1.4), contributed to both mortality and failure to improve QOL at 180 days (all p < 0.05). The median INSITE and INSITE-QOL scores were 0.0 [0.0, 1.6] and 0.0 [0.0, 0.0], respectively. At 9.4% (n = 17) of centers, a high INSITE score (≥13) was present in 15% of patients, while the top 25% of centers had perfect INSITE-QOL scores in at least 75% of patients., Conclusions: AEs after LVAD confer differential impact on mortality and QOL, enabling the development of global rank outcome scores. Given the high mortality hazard conferred by 180-day AEs, center-specific quality interventions aimed at reducing early complications provide the greatest opportunity to improve long-term survival and QOL., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Objectives: Our aim was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of heart transplants in Spain., Methods: We analyzed trends in recipient and donor characteristics, recipient-donor interaction, surgical procedures, immunosuppression, and outcomes of patients included in the Spanish heart transplant registry from 2014 to 2023. Changes in survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: In 2023, 325 cardiac transplants were performed (4.5% more than in the previous year), with a total of 2987 procedures from 2014 to 2023. There was a trend toward performing more transplants in women (29.2%), with etiologies other than cardiomyopathy (32.6%), and with better pretransplant status (less hepatic [12.5%], renal [glomerular filtration rate, 81.5mL/min/1.73 m 2 ], and respiratory [8.7%] involvement). In 2023, the number of urgent transplants increased (44% of the total), especially those performed after circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (36% of total assistance), and transplants performed with donation after circulatory death (17.9%). Survival improved in the triennium from 2020 to 2022 compared with 2014 to 2016 (83.0% at 1 year from 2020-2022 vs 79.0% from 2014-2016)., Conclusions: The number of transplants performed in Spain showed an upward trend, with recipients with better clinical status and an increasing use of donation after circulatory death. Survival improved in the last triennium., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Frailty is associated with poor clinical outcomes in heart failure patients. The impact of frailty on outcomes following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, however, is less clearly defined. We therefore sought to conduct a systematic review to evaluate current frailty assessment strategies and their significance for patients undergoing LVAD implantation. We conducted a comprehensive electronic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases from inception until April 2021 for studies examining frailty in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Study characteristics, patient demographics, type of frailty measurement, and outcomes were extracted. Outcomes were organized into 5 basic categories: implant length of stay (iLOS), 1-year mortality, rehospitalization, adverse events, and quality of life (QOL). Of the 260 records retrieved, 23 studies involving 4935 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Approaches to measuring frailty varied, with the 2 most common being sarcopenia determined by computed tomography and Fried's frailty phenotype assessment. Outcomes of interest were also widely variable, with iLOS stay and mortality being the most frequently reported, albeit with differing definitions of both between studies. The heterogeneity among included studies precluded quantitative synthesis. Narrative synthesis showed that frailty by any measure is more likely to be associated with higher mortality, longer iLOS, more adverse events and worse QOL post-LVAD implant. Frailty can be a valuable prognostic indicator in patients undergoing LVAD implantation. Further studies are needed to determine the most sensitive frailty assessment, as well as the ways in which frailty may serve as a modifiable target to improve outcomes following LVAD implantation., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The HeartMate 3 (Abbott) left ventricular assist device provides substantial improvement in long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. The Implantation of the HeartMate 3 in Subjects With Heart Failure Using Surgical Techniques Other Than Full Median Sternotomy study compares thoracotomy-based implantation clinical outcomes with standard median sternotomy., Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study in patients eligible for HeartMate 3 implantation with thoracotomy-based surgical technique (bilateral thoracotomy or partial upper sternotomy with left thoracotomy). The composite primary end point was survival free of disabling stroke (modified Rankin score >3), or reoperation to remove or replace a malfunctioning device, or conversion to median sternotomy at 6-months postimplant (elective transplants were treated as a success). The primary end point (noninferiority, -15% margin) was assessed with >90% power compared with a propensity score-matched cohort (ratio 1:2) derived from the Multi-Center Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy With HeartMate 3 continued access protocol., Results: The study enrolled 102 patients between December 2020 and July 2022 in the thoracotomy-based arm at 23 North American centers. Follow-up concluded in December 2022. In the Implantation of the HeartMate 3 in Subjects With Heart Failure Using Surgical Techniques Other Than Full Median Sternotomy study group, noninferiority criteria was met (absolute between-group difference, -1.2%; Farrington Manning lower 1-sided 95% CI, -9.3%; P < .0025) and event-free survival was not different (85.0% vs 86.2%; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.58-2.10). Length of stay with thoracotomy-based implant was longer (median, 20 vs 17 days; P = .03). No differences were observed for blood product utilization, adverse events (including right heart failure), functional status, and quality of life between cohorts., Conclusions: Thoracotomy-based implantation of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device is noninferior to implantation via standard full sternotomy. This study supports thoracotomy-based implantation as an additional standard for surgical implantation of the HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist device., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement Dr Gosev reports consulting for Abbott. Dr Pham reports consulting for Abbott, Abiomed, and Medtronic. Dr Itoh reports speaker honoraria from Abbott and Abiomed. Dr Kotkar is a speaker (nonfinancial) for Abiomed and 3M. Dr Naka reports consulting for Abbott, Biomet-Zimmer, Cryolife, and receiving speaker’s fees for Nipro Co. Dr Peltz reports research support from Bridge to Life Ltd and Paragonix Inc. Dr Silvestry reports consulting for Abbott, Abiomed, Medtronic, and data and safety monitoring board participation for Carmat. Dr Leacche reports consulting for Abbott and advisory board participation for Abiomed. Dr Rao reports consulting for Abbott, Medtronic, and Gore. Dr Sun reports consulting for Abbott. Dr Tedford reports consulting for Abbott, Medtronic, Aria CV Inc, Alleviant, Acorai, Acceleron, Cytokinetics, Itamar, Edwards LifeSciences, Eidos Therapeutics, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Gradient, and United Therapeutics. He is the national co-principal investigator for the RIGHT-FLOW clinical trial (Edwards), serves on steering committees for Merck, and a research advisory board for Abiomed. He also does hemodynamic core lab work for Merck. Dr Mokadam reports consulting for Abbott, Medtronic, SynCardia, Carmat, and Xylocor. Drs McNutt and Crandall are employees of Abbott. Dr Mehra reports payment made to institution from Abbott for consulting; consulting fees from Mesoblast, Janssen, Moderna, and Paragonix, and Baim Institute for clinical research; he is an advisory board member for Transmedics, NuPulseCV, Leviticus, and FineHeart. Dr Salerno reports consulting for Abbott. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article reported no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

For smaller pediatric patients on ventricular assist devices, the Berlin Heart EXCOR remains the main form of durable support. It requires a connection to the external IKUS, which has limited portability and battery life. The new EXCOR Active mobile driving unit has a battery life of up to 13 hours. We describe the first North American experience with the EXCOR Active in pediatric patients with a Berlin Heart device. A retrospective chart review was undertaken. Between October 2022 and March 2024, 7 patients were on a Berlin Heart and supported with the EXCOR Active. All patients were initially supported with the IKUS with a median time to transition to the EXCOR Active of 12.0 days (interquartile range [IQR] 9.5, 18.5) and a median time of support with the EXCOR Active of 65.0 days (IQR, 32.0, 81.0). The EXCOR Active posed no significant safety issues, and minimal operating issues were noted. Following the transition from IKUS to the EXCOR Active, there was increased patient and caregiver mobility throughout the hospital. Use of the EXCOR Active has the potential to improve the quality of life in pediatric patients waiting for heart transplantation., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mechanical circulatory support devices have profoundly transformed the management of severe cardiothoracic disorders. While heart transplantation is the gold standard therapy for end-stage heart disease, long-term mechanical support devices are a viable alternative for those ineligible and/or those awaiting organ availability. Major technological advancements were made over first 5 decades of development, resulting in improved durability and survival with reduced adverse events. However, gains have tapered recently for various complications (e.g., internal bleeding, multisystem organ failure), which collectively represent a significant proportion of disability and/or mortality. Further, in light of mature ventricular assist devices failing during clinical trials or even after clinical approval (class I withdrawals), it is timely to consider: Are our preclinical assessment protocols vital in the design and development of mechanical circulatory support devices, providing a realistic and reliable profile of future clinical performance? This commentary explores this question and analyses development pathways through the lens of the various disciplines involved in the preclinical assessment of mechanical circulatory support technologies: Limitations in approaches to benchtop blood testing, computational design and simulation, and animal testing are discussed as likely contributors to some of the common hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs). While it is acknowledged that some shortcomings are pragmatic in nature, possible solutions are presented that will only be realized through truly transdisciplinary and open approaches that challenge the current nature of medical device development. We suggest that these can and must be overcome to diminish HRAEs and will potentially demarcate the fourth generation of cardiac assist devices., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sarcopenia is underappreciated in advanced heart failure and is not routinely assessed. In patients receiving a left ventricular assist device, preoperative sarcopenia, defined by using computed-tomography (CT)-derived pectoralis muscle-area index (muscle area indexed to body-surface area), is an independent predictor of postoperative mortality. The association between preoperative sarcopenia and outcomes after heart transplant (HT) is unknown., Objectives: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative sarcopenia, diagnosed using the pectoralis muscle-area index, is an independent predictor of days alive and out of the hospital (DAOHs) post-transplant., Methods: Patients who underwent HT between January, 2018, and June, 2022, with available preoperative chest CT scans were included. Sarcopenia was diagnosed as pectoralis muscle-area index in the lowest sex-specific tertile. The primary endpoint was DAOHs at 1 year post-transplant., Results: The study included 169 patients. Patients with sarcopenia (n = 55) had fewer DAOHs compared to those without sarcopenia, with a median difference of 17 days (320 vs 337 days; P = 0.004). Patients with sarcopenia had longer index hospitalizations and were also more likely to be discharged to a facility other than home. In a Poisson regression model, sarcopenia was a significant univariable and the strongest multivariable predictor of DAOHs at 1 year (parameter estimate = -0.17, 95% CI -0.19 to -14; P = < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Preoperative sarcopenia, diagnosed using the pectoralis muscle-area index, is an independent predictor of poor outcomes after HT. This parameter is easily measurable from commonly obtained preoperative CT scans and may be considered in transplant evaluations., Competing Interests: Disclosures There were no outside sources of funding for this study., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are well-established for treating end-stage heart failure, but this therapy is only available to Chinese patients in recent years. The CH-VAD is the first used fully magnetically levitated pump in China. This study reports the long-term outcomes of a cohort supported by the CH-VAD for the first time., Methods: From June 2017 to August 2023, 50 consecutive patients received CH-VAD implantation in Fuwai Hospital. Clinical data were collected and retrospectively analyzed., Results: Baseline characteristics included a mean age of 47.9 ± 13.9 years, 90% male, and 26% ischemic etiology. The Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile revealed 12% profile 1, 56% profile 2, 26% profile 3, and 6% profile 4. The mean support duration was 868 ± 630 days (range 33 days-6.4 years). Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 93% (95% CI, 79-98) at 1 year, 93% (95% CI, 79-98) at 2 years, and 89% (95% CI, 71-96) at 3 years. Forty patients (80%) currently remain on support, 3 were bridged to recovery, 2 received transplants, and 5 expired during support. Major adverse events (AEs) included right heart failure (10%), surgical-related bleeding (8%), arrhythmia (8%), and driveline infection (16%). Major hemocompatibility-related AEs were limited to 3 nondisabling strokes and 1 gastrointestinal bleeding. No major device malfunction occurred during the follow-up period., Conclusions: The largest single-center experience with the leading LVAD in China shows high survival with low complication rates, demonstrating that CH-VAD is safe and efficient in providing long-term support for patients with end-stage heart failure., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The development of aortic insufficiency (AI) during HeartMate 3 durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) support can lead to ineffective pump output and recurrent heart failure symptoms. Progression of AI often comingles with the occurrence of other hemodynamic-related events encountered during LVAD support, including right heart failure, arrhythmias, and cardiorenal syndrome. While data on AI burdens and clinical impact are still insufficient in patients on HeartMate 3 support, moderate or worse AI occurs in approximately 8% of patients by 1 year and studies suggest AI continues to progress over time and is associated with increased frequency of right heart failure. The first line intervention for AI management is prevention, undertaking surgical intervention on the insufficient valve at the time of dLVAD implant and avoiding excessive device flows and hypertension during long-term support. Device speed augmentation may then be undertaken to try and overcome the insufficient lesion, but the progression of AI should be anticipated over the long term. Surgical or transcatheter aortic valve interventions may be considered in dLVAD patients with significant persistent AI despite medical management, but neither intervention is without risk. It is imperative that future studies of dLVAD support capture AI in clinical end-points using uniform assessment and grading of AI severity by individuals trained in AI assessment during dLVAD support., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

To examine temporal changes in patient characteristics, the incidence rate of surgical intervention, and the three-year mortality rate for patients undergoing surgical intervention for mitral valve stenosis (MS) from 2001 to 2021 in Denmark. Utilizing Danish nationwide registries, we identified all adult patients undergoing first-time surgical intervention for MS (2001-2021). Temporal changes in the incidence rate of surgical intervention across calendar periods were investigated (2001-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2015, and 2016-2021). Using Kaplan-Meier estimates, we computed temporal changes in three-year all-cause mortality across calendar periods. With multivariable Cox regression analysis, we assessed the adjusted rates of mortality. We included 256 patients (median age 60.3 years, 31.3% males). A stepwise decrease in the burden of chronic heart failure was identified (2001-2005: 54%, and 2016-2021: 20%, p-value < 0.001 for trend), while the burden of atrial fibrillation seemed stable (2001-2005: 51%, and 2016-2021: 46%, p-value = 0.27 for trend). The proportion of patients with rheumatic MS was 64% in 2001-2005 and 33% in 2016-2021, p-value < 0.001 for trend. 28 patients (10.9%) had mitral valve surgery prior to the first-time surgical intervention for MS. A stepwise decrease in the incidence rate of surgical intervention was observed: 3.3 cases per million person-years in 2001-2005 and 2.2 in 2016-2021. The incidence of patients diagnosed with first-time MS remained stable over calendar periods (2001-2005: 54.5 incidences per million person-years, and 2016-2021: 41.9, p-value = 0.46 for trend). The in-hospital mortality was 8.6% and the three-year mortality after surgical discharge was 9.0%, and we found no difference over calendar periods in either crude estimates or adjusted analysis. From nationwide data across three decades, we identified that the incidence of surgical interventiondecreased significantly within the past 20 years, while all-cause mortality remained stable. The burden of heart failure decreased, while the burden of atrial fibrillation remained stable over the study period., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: Dr Sohns received research support and lecture fees from Medtronic, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster; is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster; and has received grant support from the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung and Deutsche Herzstiftung. Dr Sommer is member of the Advisory Board for Abbott, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic.

Background: The current incidence and outcomes of structural transcatheter procedures in heart transplant (HTx) recipients and left-ventricular assist devices (LVAD) carriers is unknown., Aims: To provide insights on structural transcatheter procedures performed across HTx and LVAD patients in Spain., Methods: Multicenter, ambispective, observational nationwide registry., Results: Until May/2023, 36 percutaneous structural interventions were performed (78% for HTx and 22% for LVAD) widely varying among centers (0%-1.4% and 0%-25%, respectively). Percutaneous mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge (TEER) was the most common (n = 12, 33.3%), followed by trancatheter aortic valve replacement (n = 11, 30.5%), and tricuspid procedures (n = 9, 25%). Mitral TEER resulted in mild residual mitral regurgitation in all but one case, mean gradient was <5 mmHg in 75% of them at 1-year, with no mortality and 8.3% re-admission rate. Tricuspid TEER resulted in 100% none/mild residual regurgitation with a 1-year mortality and readmission rates of 22% and 28.5%, respectively. Finally, trancatheter aortic valve replacement procedures (n = 8 in LVADs due to aortic regurgitation and n = 3 in HTx), were successful in all cases with one prosthesis degeneration leading to severe aortic regurgitation at 1-year, 18.2% mortality rate and no re-admissions. Globally, major bleeding rates were 7.9% and 12.5%, thromboembolic events 3.7% and 12.5%, readmissions 37% and 25%, and mortality 22% and 25%, in HTx and LVADs respectively. No death was related to the implanted transcatheter device., Conclusions: Most centers with HTx/LVAD programs perform structural percutaneous procedures but with very inconsistent incidence. They were associated with good safety and efficacy, but larger studies are required to provide formal recommendations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Patients with heart failure (HF) and underlying coronary artery disease (CAD) have a substantially higher risk of mortality compared with those with HF from other causes. However, identifying individuals with HF for whom revascularization is likely to improve prognosis is a complex clinical decision. Revascularization is likely beneficial for patients with CAD-predominant symptoms, such as those with acute myocardial infarction or stable ischemic heart disease with refractory angina. However, for patients with HF-predominant symptoms, characterized by dyspnea without acute myocardial infarction or refractory angina, the benefits of revascularization are less clear. This state-of-the-art review summarizes the outcomes, clinical trials, and therapeutic approaches for patients with both CAD and HF, and proposes a therapeutic algorithm to guide the diagnosis and comprehensive workup of these complex patients., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Dr Kapur receives institutional research support and consulting/speaking honoraria from Abbott, Abiomed, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Getinge, LivaNova, Edwards, and Zoll. Dr Kapur is a co-founder of X-Tension Inc and Tulyp Inc. The other authors report no conflicts.

Introduction: Heart transplantation (HTx) has emerged as a pivotal intervention for end-stage heart failure, offering significant improvements in survival and quality of life. This manuscript elucidates the landscape of HTx across Latin America (LATAM) from its advent in 1968 through December 2022, shedding light on its evolution, current practices, and regional disparities., Methods: We distributed a structured questionnaire to the national coordinators or representatives of the Interamerican Council of Heart Failure and Pulmonary Hypertension, collating responses from 20 LATAM nations. This approach facilitated a comprehensive aggregation of regional HTx data., Results: A total of 12,374 HTx were performed in 166 centers across 16 LATAM countries, with Brazil, Argentina, and Colombia accounting for the majority of procedures. Pediatric transplants represented 9% of the total caseload, and combined organ transplants were reported in 62.5% of the participating countries, underscoring the complexity and breadth of transplant services in the region., Conclusion: Despite facing infrastructural and logistical challenges, LATAM has demonstrated a robust capacity to conduct high-complexity transplant procedures. The establishment of a structured, regional HTx registry is imperative to enhance data collection and analysis, which in turn can inform clinical decision-making and policy development, ultimately improving patient outcomes across the continent., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Bridging from a temporary microaxial left ventricular assist device (tLVAD) to a durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) is playing an increasing role in the treatment of terminally ill patients with heart failure. Scant data exist about the best implant strategy. The goal of this study was to analyse differences in the dLVAD implant technique and effects on patient outcomes., Methods: Data from 341 patients (19 European centres) who underwent a bridge-to-bridge implant from tLVAD to dLVAD between January 2017 and October 2022 were retrospectively analysed. The outcomes of the different implant techniques with the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal life support or tLVAD were compared., Results: A durable LVAD implant was performed employing cardiopulmonary bypass in 70% of cases (n = 238, group 1), extracorporeal life support in 11% (n = 38, group 2) and tLVAD in 19% (n = 65, group 3). Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences in age (P = 0.140), body mass index (P = 0.388), creatinine level (P = 0.659), the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (P = 0.190) and rate of dialysis (P = 0.110). Group 3 had significantly fewer patients with preoperatively invasive ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation before the tLVAD was implanted (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001 respectively). Concomitant procedures were performed more often in groups 1 and 2 compared to group 3 (24%, 37% and 5%, respectively, P < 0.001). The 30-day mortality data showed significantly better survival after an inverse probability of treatment weighting in group 3, but the 1-year mortality showed no significant differences among the groups (P = 0.012 and 0.581, respectively). Postoperative complications like the rate of right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implants or re-thoracotomy due to bleeding, postoperative respiratory failure and renal replacement therapy showed no significant differences among the groups. Freedom from the first adverse event like stroke, driveline infection or pump thrombosis during follow-up was not significantly different among the groups. Postoperative blood transfusions within 24 h were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared to surgery on tLVAD support (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively)., Conclusions: In our analysis, the transition from tLVAD to dLVAD without further circulatory support did not show a difference in postoperative long-term survival, but a better 30-day survival was reported. The implant using only tLVAD showed a reduction in postoperative transfusion rates, without increasing the risk of postoperative stroke or pump thrombosis. In this small cohort study, our data support the hypothesis that a dLVAD implant on a tLVAD is a safe and feasible technique in selected patients., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy has evolved from a short-term bridge-to-transplant strategy into a long-term and often chronic therapy due to long waiting times for heart transplantation and application as destination therapy. Consequently, patients are at risk of developing complications necessitating LVAD exchange. The aim of this study is to assess patient outcomes after LVAD exchange., Methods: Patients who underwent LVAD exchange between January 2010 and December 2022 were included. Logistic and cox regression analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for short and long-term adverse events, respectively. Survival after exchange was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates., Results: Sixty-one patients underwent a total of 80 LVAD exchanges. Most frequently observed short-term complications were pulmonary infections (16.3%) and right heart failure (16.3%). Exit-site infections (34.7%) and device malfunctions (25.3%) were the most often observed long-term complications. HeartWare ventricular assist device as index device was associated with a higher risk of right heart failure [hazard ratio 6.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.80-22.90] and respiratory failure (hazard ratio 7.81, 95% CI 1.95-31.23) compared to HeartMate II and HeartMate 3. Survival was 83% (95% CI 75.5-95.3%) at 1 year and 67% (95% CI 53.9-84.7%) at 6 years after exchange. After 5 years, 25.0% was transplanted, 23.8% had undergone a re-exchange and 32.5% was alive without new intervention., Conclusions: Although LVAD exchange can be performed with a relatively low mortality, other post-operative adverse events are common. Patients with the HeartWare ventricular assist device as index device may be at higher risk of developing right heart failure and respiratory failure after exchange., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Heart failure (HF) is a progressive disease. It is estimated that more than 250,000 patients suffer from advanced HF with reduced ejection fraction refractory to medical therapy. With limited donor pool for heart transplant, continue flow left ventricle assist device (LVAD) is a lifesaving treatment option for patients with advanced HF. This review will provide an update on indications, contraindications, and associated adverse events for LVAD support with a summary of the current outcomes data., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: An inflammatory milieu after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with multi-organ dysfunction and pre-operative heightened inflammatory state is associated with right ventricular failure after LVAD implantation., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 30 LVAD patients in our institution within the last 2 years for the development of fever and compared them to 30 non-LVAD open-heart surgery patients., Results: Our results suggest that patients undergoing LVAD implantation are more likely to develop fever in the immediate post-operative period compared to other open-heart surgeries. This is independent of pharmacological treatment, age, or ethnical background. Females and obese patients were more likely to develop fever., Conclusion: Patients with right ventricular dysfunction, as demonstrated by elevated central venous pressure (CVP), had the strongest correlation with fever development. These results pose the question if there is a systemic inflammatory response-like phenomenon driven by increased right ventricular dysfunction., (© 2024 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve survival and reduce symptoms in patients with advanced heart failure; however, the longer-term durability of LVADs remains uncertain especially with older-generation devices. In this case report, we describe the clinical course of a patient who has been successfully treated with the same HeartMate II LVAD for 14 years, the longest published and still ongoing LVAD support with the same originally implanted device., Competing Interests: E.N. acknowledges speaker’s honoraria from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer, with no direct disclosures relevant to the current study. Similarly, L.H.L. has no direct disclosures associated with the present work. However, his unrelated disclosures include research grants from AstraZeneca and Boston Scientific, as well as consulting or speaker’s honoraria from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, St Jude, Medtronic, Vifor Pharma, and Abbott. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

Purpose of Review: Mechanical circulatory support is used frequently as a method of stabilizing patients with end stage heart failure who are unable to safely await allograft availability. While this technology has been fundamentally important in supporting patients with normal cardiac anatomy, it is still used infrequently in adult patients with congenital heart disease and end-stage heart failure. Here, we review the data on mechanical circulatory support technology in this small but growing population of patients with chronic heart disease prone to the development of circulatory failure., Recent Findings: Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has been increasingly employed in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) as a bridge to transplant. The new United Network for Organ Sharing listing system favoring temporary MCS use with a higher listing status offers another tool to stabilize ACHD patients and potentially shorten wait times. Both temporary and Durable MCS could help improve transplant candidacy and posttransplant outcomes in select groups of ACHD patients., Summary: Durable and temporary MCS have the potential to significantly improve access to transplant and overall transplant outcomes in ACHD patients., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

BiVACOR's Total Artificial Heart has been successfully implanted in a patient at Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center in the Texas Medical Center. The patient survived with the device for 8 days before receiving a heart transplant. This success stemmed from collaboration between BiVACOR Inc. and a team of cardiac surgeons at the Texas Heart Institute, including William E. Cohn, M.D., and Oscar H. Frazier, MD., (© 2024 International Center for Artificial Organs and Transplantation and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

The Pennsylvania State University (PSU) Child Pump, a centrifugal continuous-flow ventricular assist device (cf-VAD), is being developed as a suitable long-term implantable device for pediatric heart failure patients between 10 and 35 kg, body surface area (BSA) of 0.5-1.2 m 2 , 1-11 years of age, and requiring a mean cardiac output of 1.0-3.5 L/min. In-vitro hydraulic and hemodynamic performances were evaluated on a custom mock circulatory loop with ovine blood. Normalized index of hemolysis (NIH) was evaluated under four conditions: 1) 8,300 rpm, 3.5 L/min, Δ P = 60 mm Hg, 2) 8,150 rpm, 5.1 L/min, Δ P = 20 mm Hg, 3) 8,400 rpm, 3.2 L/min, Δ P = 70 mm Hg, and 4) 9,850 rpm, 5.0 L/min, Δ P = 80 mm Hg, resulting in normalized index of hemolysis = 0.027 ± 0.013, 0.015 ± 0.006, 0.016 ± 0.008, and 0.026 ± 0.011 mg/dl, respectively. A mock fit study was conducted using a three-dimensional printed model of a 19 kg patient's thoracic cavity to compare the size of the PSU Child Pump to the HeartMate3 and the HVAD. Results indicate the PSU Child Pump will be a safer, appropriately sized device capable of providing the given patient cohort proper support while minimizing the risks of blood trauma as they wait for a transplant., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

Background: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients report symptom improvement but find adjusting to life with the LVAD challenging. These challenges are unique, and existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) do not reflect their experiences. This study aimed to develop a culturally relevant quality of life PROM for use with LVAD recipients in future research, design evolutions and clinical practice., Methods: A three-stage mixed-methods approach was used to develop a PROM: stage 1 included group concept mapping (GCM); stage 2 semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 11 LVAD recipients and 10 clinicians, and a questionnaire was developed using a conceptual framework; and stage 3 used exploratory psychometric analysis of the PROM data using Rasch measurement theory. This paper presents stages 2 and 3., Results: The conceptual framework consisted of four key concepts, including general health, life with the LVAD, equipment and clothing and emotional impact. Statements from interviews and GCM were used to create items for the LVAD quality of life (LVAD-QoL). Cognitive interviews tested face validity and participant comprehension. Forty-nine participants were recruited from three UK transplant centres. PROM data were collected and analysed using Rasch analysis. Four items displayed misfit; dependency between item sets was the biggest issue (57/485 pairwise differences). After restructuring and dealing with item misfit, the LVAD-QoL conformed to the Rasch model, supporting the psychometric properties and quality of the LVAD-QoL., Conclusions: Using a mixed-methods approach ensured the development of a robust and psychometrically sound tool for research, design evolution and clinical practice with LVAD recipients., (© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

This study aimed to explore the potential impact of the angular position of the outflow graft on thromboembolic events and aortic valve regurgitation in people with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). We analyzed contrast computed tomography (CT) data of patients with LVAD implantation between 2016 and 2021. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the outflow graft and aortic arch were performed to calculate the horizontal (azimuth) angle and vertical (polar) angle, as well as the relative distance between the outflow graft, aortic valve, and brachiocephalic artery. Among 59 patients (median age 57, 68% male), a vertical angle ≥107° correlated significantly with increased cerebrovascular accidents (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-26.3, p = 0.022) and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.0-11.2, p = 0.049) during a median 25 month follow-up. No significant differences were found between the vertical angle and aortic valve regurgitation or survival. The horizontal angle and relative distance did not show differences regarding clinical adverse events. This study emphasizes the importance of the LVAD outflow graft angular position to prevent life-threatening thromboembolic events. This study suggests the need for prospective research to further validate these findings., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

Aims: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, a therapy for end-stage heart failure, is associated with platelet (PLT) activation. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic impact of PLT count in patients with LVAD implantation., Methods and Results: Data from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) registry were investigated, and patients were divided into three groups according to tertiles. The dynamic change of PLT counts and its associations with long-term outcomes were analysed. The primary outcome was long-term mortality. A total of 19 517 patients who received the first continuous-flow LVAD were identified from the INTERMACS registry. The PLT count underwent a dynamic change towards normalization after LVAD implantation. Compared with intermediate, both high (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.17, P = 0.033) and low (HR, 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.27, P < 0.001) pre-implant PLT counts were associated with an increased risk of 2 year mortality. Compared with intermediate, a high post-implant PLT count was associated with an increased risk of 4 year mortality (HR, 1.38, 95% CI: 1.26 to 1.52, P < 0.001). Besides, both pre- and post-implant PLT counts exhibit a U-shaped association with the risk of mortality., Conclusions: LVAD implantation could improve the PLT count towards normalization. Abnormal pre-/post-implant PLT counts were independently associated with increased risks of long-term mortality., (© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Interatrial shunts are under evaluation as a treatment for heart failure (HF); however, their in vivo flow performance has not been quantitatively studied. We aimed to investigate the fluid dynamics properties of the 0.51 cm orifice diameter Ventura shunt and assess its lumen integrity with serial transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)., Methods and Results: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and bench flow tests were used to establish the flow-pressure relationship of the shunt. Open-label patients from the RELIEVE-HF trial underwent TEE at shunt implant and at 6 and 12 month follow-up. Shunt effective diameter (D eff ) was derived from the vena contracta, and flow was determined by the continuity equation. CFD and bench studies independently validated that the shunt's discharge coefficient was 0.88 to 0.89. The device was successfully implanted in all 97 enrolled patients; mean age was 70 ± 11 years, 97% were NYHA class III, and 51% had LVEF ≤40%. Patency was confirmed in all instances, except for one stenotic shunt at 6 months. D eff remained unchanged from baseline at 12 months (0.47 ± 0.01 cm, P = 0.376), as did the trans-shunt mean pressure gradient (5.1 ± 3.9 mmHg, P = 0.316) and flow (1137 ± 463 mL/min, P = 0.384). TEE measured flow versus pressure closely correlated (R 2  ≥ 0.98) with a fluid dynamics model. At 12 months, the pulmonary/systemic flow Qp/Qs ratio was 1.22 ± 0.12., Conclusions: When implanted in patients with advanced HF, this small interatrial shunt demonstrated predictable and durable patency and performance., (© 2024 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

Purpose of Review: With advances in the field of congenital cardiac surgery and in the management of congenital heart defects in early life, the population of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is increasing. End-stage heart failure is currently the main cause of cardiovascular mortality and is expected to increase in the coming years. This review summarizes recent innovations in transplant techniques, with special attention to what is known in the population of ACHD recipients., Recent Findings: The use of machine perfusion for heart preservation enables longer preservation times. Normothermic (organ care system - OCS) and hypothermic (hypothermic oxygenated perfusion - HOPE) machine perfusion will alleviate the time pressure associated with heart transplantation in the ACHD population, may allow for expansion of the geographical range in which donors can be matched and may improve graft quality. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation, either through direct procurement-machine perfusion (DP-MP) or thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) is a viable strategy to further expand the donor pool., Summary: The use of machine perfusion and DCD donors in ACHD is feasible and shows promise. Time pressure and shortage of donors is even more critical in ACHD than in other patient populations, making these innovations particularly relevant. Further clinical experience and research is needed to elucidate their impact., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosures The author has no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Aims: This study aimed to compare the changes in the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) geometry and performance after the implantation of HeartMate II (HMII) and HeartMate 3 (HM3). In addition, we investigated whether the echocardiographic parameters LV sphericity index (LVSI) and the novel pressure-dimension index (PDI) can predict post-operative right ventricular failure (RVF)., Methods and Results: Between 2012 and 2020, 46 patients [HMII (n = 22) and HM3 (n = 24)] met the study's criteria and had echocardiography tests pre-operatively, 6 and 12 months post-operatively. The LVSI and PDI were calculated together with the standard LV and RV echocardiographic parameters. The mean follow-up was 24 ± 7 months. In both groups, the LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) significantly decreased 12 months post-operatively compared with the pre-operative values (HMII: 6.4 ± 1.4 cm vs. 5.7 ± 0.9 cm, P = 0.040; HM3: 6.7 ± 1.3 cm vs. 5.5 ± 0.9 cm, P < 0.01, respectively). RV function 12 months post-operatively was better in the HM3 group than in the HMII group, as indicated by a significantly higher RV fractional area change (RVFAC) in the HM3 group than in the HMII group 12 months post-operatively (35 ± 12% vs. 26 ± 16%, P = 0.039), significantly higher tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) in the HM3 group 12 months post-operatively compared with the HMII group (13.9 ± 1.9 mm vs. 12.0 ± 2.1 mm, P = 0.002), and the tissue Doppler estimated tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV) was also significantly higher in the HM3 group 12 months post-operatively compared with the HMII group (11.5 ± 2.7 mm/s vs. 9.9 ± 1.5 mm/s, P = 0.020). The LVSI value was significantly higher 12 months post-operatively in the HMII group than in the HM3 group (1.2 ± 0.4 vs. 0.8 ± 0.2, P = 0.001, respectively), indicating worse geometric changes. The PDI decreased 12 months post-operatively in the HM3-group compared with the baseline (3.4 ± 1.4 mmHg/cm 2 vs. 2.0 ± 0.8 mmHg/cm 2 , P < 0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, only the pre-operative PDI was a predictor of post-operative RVF [odds ratio: 3.84 (95% CI: 1.53-18.16, P = 0.022)]. The area under the curve for pre-operative PDI was 0.912. The 2 year survival was significantly better in the HM3 group (log-rank, P = 0.042)., Conclusions: The design of HM3 offered better geometrical preservation of the LV and enabled normal PDI values, leading to improved RV function, as indicated by better RVFAC, TAPSE, and TASV values. The use of pre-operative PDI as an additional tool for established risk scores might offer a better pre-operative predictor of RVF., (© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

With changes in the heart transplant allocation system in the United States, the use of left ventricular device therapy (LVAD) as a bridge to transplant has decreased. Currently, one of the primary reasons to implant a device is for patient support until they can lose weight to qualify for transplant. This paper reviews the outcomes of various weight loss strategies for patients with LVADs including weight reduction surgery and cardiac rehab. Additionally, results of the use of GLP1 agonists on weight loss in general and in heart failure patients is reviewed. Finally, because of the unique issues involving exercise for patients with LVADs, we review safe exercise techniques with instructions for patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Stuart D. Russell reports a relationship with Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure Management that includes: consulting or advisory. Stuart D. Russell reports a relationship with Abbott that includes: consulting or advisory. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are used to assist the heart function of patients with advanced heart failure. Computational fluid dynamics in VADs are widely applied in the development and optimization, for example, to evaluate blood damage. For these simulations, the pulsating operating conditions, in which the VAD operates, should be included accurately. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the flow in a VAD by interacting with patient-specific cardiovascular systems of heart failure patients. A numeric method will be presented, which includes a patient-specific cardiovascular system model that is bidirectionally coupled with a three-dimensional (3D) flow simulation of the HeartMate 3. The cardiovascular system is represented by a lumped parameter model. Three heart failure patients are considered, based on clinical data from end-stage heart failure patients. Various parameters of the cardiovascular system and the VAD are analyzed, for example, flow rates, pressures, VAD heads, and efficiencies. A further important parameter is the blood damage potential of the VAD, which varies significantly among different patients. Moreover, the predicted blood damage fluctuates within a single heartbeat. The increase in blood damage is evaluated based on the operating conditions. Both, overload and especially partial load conditions during the pulsating operation result in elevated blood damage., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASAIO.)

Durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are a well-established therapeutic option for patients with advanced heart failure. These devices are often used to "bridge" patients to an orthotopic heart transplantation (HT). Unfortunately, many patients on LVAD support with a body mass index (BMI) above a certain value are not eligible for HT due a lack of suitable donors and the association between obesity and poor outcomes after HT. This case series describes three individuals on LVAD support who were able to successfully lose enough weight to qualify to be listed for an HT. We highlight a systematic, multidisciplinary approach to implementing guideline-driven weight loss strategies, including some aggressive methods ( ie , meal replacements, weight loss medications, and bariatric surgery). In addition to describing the weight loss outcomes, we also discuss barriers and medical challenges during weight loss that are unique to this population., Competing Interests: Disclosure: J.A.C. is serving on the Steering Committee, Advisory Board, and as National PI for HM3, speaker, and DSMB member for HALO-Shock at Abbott. At Medtronic, she is the National PI and part of the Steering Committee for HVAD DT PAS. At Procyrion, she advises and serves as a Steering Committee member with stock options for a pilot trial. At Endotronix, she is an unpaid Steering Committee member for the Proactive HF trial. She is a Steering Committee member for the Restore-HF trial at Nuwellis, an Advisory Board member and consultant at BiVACOR, and both a consultant and speaker at BioVentrix. She also serves as a speaker for fellows conferences at Zoll, a consultant and SC member at CorWave, a DSMB member for the EXCOR pediatric VAD at Berlin Heart, and a consultant and Steering Committee member for BrioVAD at CH Biomedical. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2024.)

There is an evolving role for guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in managing heart failure with reduced ejection fraction after cardiac surgery. GDMT is based on the use of pharmacologic agents from each of 4 distinct drug classes, also known as the 4 pillars of heart failure therapy: β-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, often paired with neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Despite the demonstrated benefits of GDMT in reducing mortality and hospitalization rates in the nonsurgical literature, there is conspicuous underuse of GDMT after cardiac surgery. The lack of published literature and practical challenges surrounding the timing for initiation of GDMT in the immediate postoperative period has limited standardized implementation strategies. A multidisciplinary approach will be necessary to assist in initiating, titrating, and monitoring the response to these therapies in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction after cardiac surgery., Competing Interests: Disclosures Daniel Engelman reports a relationship with Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Astellas Pharma US Inc, Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Medela AG, Arthrex Inc, and Renibus Therapeutics Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. Michael Givertz reports a relationship with Merck & Co Inc that includes: consulting or advisory; and with Abbott Vascular Inc, Endtronix, and Natera Inc that includes: institutional research support. Katherine Wood reports a relationship with Abbott Vascular Inc that includes: consulting or advisory. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) implemented modifications in 2018 to the adult heart transplant allocation system to better stratify the most medically urgent transplant candidates. We evaluated the impact of these changes on patients supported by a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) with chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Objective: To evaluate the impact of the OPTN policy change on patients supported by durable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) with chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Methods: We performed an analysis of patients from the United Network of Organ Sharing Database supported by durable LVAD listed for a heart transplant (HT) between October 17, 2016 and September 30, 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: pre- and postpolicy, depending on whether they were listed on or prior to October 17, 2018. Patients who were on dialysis prior to surgery or discharge were excluded from the analysis. Patients with simultaneous heart and kidney transplants were excluded. Patients who were listed for transplant prepolicy change but transplanted postpolicy change were excluded. This cohort was then subdivided into degrees of CKD based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which resulted in 678 patients (23.7%) in Stage 1 (GFR ≥89.499) (Prepolicy: 345, Postpolicy: 333), 1233 (43.1%) in Stage 2 (89.499 > GFR ≥ 59.499) (Prepolicy: 618, Postpolicy: 615), 613 (21.4%) in Stage 3a (59.499 > GFR ≥ 44.499) (Prepolicy: 291, Postpolicy: 322), 294 (10.3%) in Stage 3b (44.499 > GFR ≥ 29.499) (Prepolicy: 143, Postpolicy: 151), 36 (1.3%) in Stage 4 (29.499 > GFR ≥ 15) (Prepolicy: 21, Postpolicy: 15), and 9 (0.3%) in Stage 5 (15 > GFR) (Prepolicy: 4, Postpolicy: 5). The primary outcome was 1-year and 2-year post-HT survival., Results: There were 2863 patients who met the study criteria (1422 prepolicy, 1441 postpolicy). Overall survival, regardless of CKD stage, was lower following the policy change (p < 0.01). There was a similar risk of primary graft failure (PGF) in the pre- and postpolicy period (1.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.26). 1-year overall survival was 93% (91, 94) and 89% (87, 91) in the pre- and postpolicy periods, respectively. 2-year overall survival was 89% (88, 91) and 85% (82, 87) in the pre- and postpolicy periods, respectively. For CKD Stages 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4, and 5, 1 -year survival was 93% (91, 95), 92% (90,93), 89% (86, 91), 89% (86, 93), 80% (68, 94), and 100% (100, 100), respectively. For CKD Stages 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 4, and 5, 2-year survival was 91% (88, 93), 88% (86, 90), 84% (81, 88), 84% (80, 89), 73% (59, 90), and 100% (100, 100), respectively. Patients with CKD 1 and 2 had better survival compared to those with CKD 3 (p < 0.01) and CKD 4 and 5 (p = 0.03) in the pre- and postpolicy periods. Patients with CKD 3 did not have a survival advantage over those with CKD 4 and 5 (p = 0.25). On cox regression analysis, advancing degrees of CKD were associated with an increased risk of mortality., Conclusions: Patients with LVAD support had decreased overall survival after the OPTN policy change. Patients with more advanced CKD had lower survival than patients without advanced CKD, though they were not impacted by the OPTN policy change., (© 2024 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.)