Search

Candida auris is a drug-resistant fungal pathogen that has emerged over the past decade as a cause of nosocomial outbreaks with substantial mortality rates (1-3). Widespread resistance to triazole antifungals, [...]

Background Environmental disinfection is essential for reducing spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). Previous studies report conflicting results regarding the effects of ultraviolet (UV) light in reducing infections. This trial evaluated the impact of adding pulsed-xenon UV (PX-UV) to standard terminal cleaning in reducing environmentally implicated HAIs (eiHAIs). Methods The Lowering the Acquisition of MDROs with Pulsed-xenon (LAMP) trial was conducted in 2 hospitals (15 inpatient wards) utilizing a cluster-randomized, controlled, double-blinded, interventional crossover trial comparing standard terminal cleaning followed by either PX-UV (intervention arm) or sham (control arm) disinfection. The primary outcome was incidence of eiHAIs from clinical microbiology tests on the fourth day of stay or later or within 3 days after discharge from the study unit. EiHAIs included clinical cultures positive for vancomycin-resistant enterococci, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumonia , methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , and Acinetobacter baumannii , and stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive for Clostridiodes difficile. Results Between 18 May 2017 and 7 January 2020, 25 732 patients were included, with an incidence of 601 eiHAIs and 180 954 patient-days. There was no difference in the rate of eiHAIs in the intervention and sham arms (3.49 vs 3.17 infections/1000 patient-days, respectively; RR, 1.10; 95% CI,.94–1.29; P =.23). Study results were similar when stratified by eiHAI type, hospital, and unit type. Conclusions The LAMP study failed to demonstrate an effect of the addition of UV light disinfection following terminal cleaning on reductions in rates of eiHAIs. Further investigations targeting hospital environmental surfaces and the role of no-touch technology to reduce HAIs are needed. Clinical Trials Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03349268; R01HS024709. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) occurs frequently, and concomitant antibiotic (CA) during the initial episode for treatment of non-CDI is a major risk factor. We sought to address the comparative efficacy of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the setting of CA during the initial CDI episode. Methods We conducted a randomized, controlled, open-label trial at 2 hospitals in Ann Arbor, Michigan. We consecutively consented and enrolled hospitalized patients ≥18 years old with diarrhea, a positive test for C. difficile , and ≥1 qualifying CA. Complicated CDI, CDI treatment for >24 hours prior to enrollment, and planned long-term (>12 weeks) CA use were notable exclusions. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of diarrhea for 2 consecutive days maintained until 2 days after therapy, and rCDI as recurrent diarrhea with positive testing ≤30 days after initial treatment. Patients were randomized to fidaxomicin or vancomycin. Results Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups of 144 patients. Rates of clinical cure (73% vs 62.9%, P =.195) and rCDI (3.3% vs 4.0%; P >.99) were similar for fidaxomicin and vancomycin in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol cohorts, respectively. Only 4 patients developed rCDI. Conclusions In this study of patients with CDI receiving CA, a numerically higher proportion were cured with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin, but this result did not reach statistical significance. Overall recurrence was lower than anticipated in both arms compared with previous studies that did not extend duration of CDI treatment during CA. Clinical Trials Registration www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02692651). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study demonstrated a favorable short-term safety profile after a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine among healthcare workers (HCWs). There were more frequent local reactions and less systemic reactions compared to the second dose. The HCWs who reported reactions had higher prebooster titer of anti-S1 antibodies compared to those who reported no reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Sepsis is a leading cause of death, particularly in immunocompromised people. The revised definition of sepsis (Sepsis-3) uses the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA (qSOFA) to identify patients with sepsis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of SOFA, qSOFA, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in immunocompromised patients. Methods Adult immunocompromised patients admitted to Michigan Medicine between 2012 and 2018 with suspected infection were included based on criteria adopted from the Sepsis-3 study. Each clinical score (SOFA ≥2, qSOFA ≥2, SIRS ≥2) was added to the baseline risk model as an ordinal variable as well as a dichotomous variable, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values were calculated. In addition, breakpoints of SOFA between 2 and 10 were assessed to identify the breakpoints with the highest sensitivity and specificity for hospital mortality. The analysis was stratified for intensive care unit (ICU) status. Results Of 2822 immunocompromised patients with a mean age of 56.8±15.6 years, 213 (7.5%) died during hospitalization. When added to the baseline risk model, SOFA score had the greatest predictive validity for hospital mortality (AUROC,0.802; 95% CI, 0.771–0.832), followed by qSOFA (AUROC,0.783; 95% CI, 0.754–0.812) and SIRS (AUROC,0.741; 95% CI, 0.708–0.774). Among the SOFA breakpoints that were evaluated, SOFA ≥6 had the greatest predictive validity and a moderate positive likelihood ratio (2.75) for hospital mortality. Conclusions The predictive validity for hospital mortality of qSOFA was similar among immunocompromised patients as that reported in the Sepsis-3 study. The sensitivity of qSOFA ≥2 for hospital mortality was low. SOFA ≥6 might be an effective tool to identify immunocompromised patients with suspected infection at high risk for clinical deterioration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Microbiologic cure is a common outcome in pneumonia clinical trials, but its clinical significance is incompletely understood. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients hospitalized with bacterial pneumonia who achieved clinical cure. Rates of recurrent pneumonia and death were compared between patients with persistent growth of the index pathogen at the time of clinical cure (microbiologic failure) and those with pathogen eradication (microbiologic cure). Results Among 441 patients, 237 experienced microbiologic cure and 204 experienced microbiologic failure. Prevalences of comorbidities, ventilator dependence, and severity of acute illness were similar between groups. Patients with microbiologic failure experienced significantly higher rates of recurrent pneumonia or death following clinical cure than patients with microbiologic cure, controlling for comorbid conditions, severity of acute illness, appropriateness of empiric antibiotics, intensive care unit placement, tracheostomy dependence, and immunocompromised status (90-day multivariable adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04–2.35). This association was observed among patients with pneumonias caused by Staphylococcus aureus (90-day multivariable adjusted OR, 3.69; 95% CI, 1.73–7.90). A trend was observed among pneumonias caused by nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli, but not Enterobacteriaceae or other pathogens. Conclusions Microbiologic treatment failure was independently associated with recurrent pneumonia or death among patients with bacterial pneumonia following clinical cure. Microbiologic cure merits further study as a metric to guide therapeutic interventions for patients with bacterial pneumonia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]