Search

Background: Bedside procedures represent a substantial proportion of the neurosurgical resident's responsibilities. Although music interventions in healthcare have classically been employed for the benefit of the patient, there is evidence in support of its positive effects on healthcare workers as well., Objectives: We aimed to create a novel framework-the shared music experience (SME)-which allows for patient and provider to discuss and mutually select a musical playlist during bedside procedural interventions., Methods: A single-center prospective pilot study with nested design was carried out during a 6-month period. One sample was neurosurgery residents at our institution, while the other was patients undergoing nonemergent bedside procedures. Primary endpoints included change in neurosurgery residents' and patients' perception of patient-provider alliance. Secondary endpoints include quantitative and qualitative analysis of feedback from residents and patients about the SME framework., Results: Twelve out of 13 (92.3%) eligible neurosurgery residents were enrolled. Twenty-eight SMEs were carried out. Twenty-six of 28 patients (92.9%) replied that they did enjoy the SME. Patients who partook in SMEs had a significant increase in metrics of patient-clinician alliance as measured by the mARM-5. All 7 residents who participated in at least 1 SME reported having enjoyed performing procedures within the framework and affirmed they would either ''often'' (2/7, 28.6%) or ''always'' (5/7, 71.4%) implement SME in future practice., Conclusions: The SME is a novel intervention that can be employed to help patients and providers find common ground through music and foster the patient-clinician relationship during bedside procedures., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patients with thoracic metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) often undergo extensive surgical decompression to avoid functional decline. Though limited in scope, scales including the revised cardiac risk index (RCRI) are used to stratify surgical risk to predict perioperative morbidity. This study uses the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) to predict outcomes following transpedicular decompression/fusion for high-grade MESCC., Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who underwent transpedicular decompression and fusion for MESCC (baseline demographics, spinal instability neoplastic score, preoperative and postoperative Bilsky scores, primary cancer type, and RCRI). Primary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), intraoperative estimated blood loss, readmission/reoperation within 90 days of index surgery, 90-day mortality, and posthospitalization disposition., Results: One hundred twenty-seven patients were included in our study. Ninety percent of patients' lesions were Bilsky 2 or greater. Increasing frailty, measured by mFI-5, was a significant predictor of increased LOS (P < 0.01) and 90-day mortality (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis adjusting for sex, body mass index , and age still showed statistical significance (P < 0.05). MFI-5 was not a significant predictor of readmission/reoperation within 90 days or estimated blood loss. Age - not mFI-5 or RCRI - was a significant predictor for posthospitalization nonhome disposition (P = 0.001)., Conclusions: The mFI-5 can serve as a useful predictor of outcomes after transpedicular decompression and fusion for thoracic MESCC as it can account for the patient's frailty. Our study demonstrated the mFI-5 as a predictor of LOS and 90-day mortality. These results provide a background to both understanding and integrating frailty into decision-making in MESCC., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: Paralysis after spinal cord injury involves damage to pathways that connect neurons in the brain to peripheral nerves in the limbs. Re-establishing this communication using neural interfaces has the potential to bridge the gap and restore upper extremity function to people with high tetraplegia. We report a novel approach for restoring upper extremity function using selective peripheral nerve stimulation controlled by intracortical microelectrode recordings from sensorimotor networks, along with restoration of tactile sensation of the hand using intracortical microstimulation., Methods: A 27-year-old right-handed man with AIS-B (motor-complete, sensory-incomplete) C3-C4 tetraplegia was enrolled into the clinical trial. Six 64-channel intracortical microelectrode arrays were implanted into left hemisphere regions involved in upper extremity function, including primary motor and sensory cortices, inferior frontal gyrus, and anterior intraparietal area. Nine 16-channel extraneural peripheral nerve electrodes were implanted to allow targeted stimulation of right median, ulnar (2), radial, axillary, musculocutaneous, suprascapular, lateral pectoral, and long thoracic nerves, to produce selective muscle contractions on demand. Proof-of-concept studies were performed to demonstrate feasibility of using a brain-machine interface to read from and write to the brain for restoring motor and sensory functions of the participant's own arm and hand., Results: Multiunit neural activity that correlated with intended motor action was successfully recorded from intracortical arrays. Microstimulation of electrodes in somatosensory cortex produced repeatable sensory percepts of individual fingers for restoration of touch sensation. Selective electrical activation of peripheral nerves produced antigravity muscle contractions, resulting in functional movements that the participant was able to command under brain control to perform virtual and actual arm and hand movements. The system was well tolerated with no operative complications., Conclusion: The combination of implanted cortical electrodes and nerve cuff electrodes has the potential to create bidirectional restoration of motor and sensory functions of the arm and hand after neurological injury., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.)

Background: While the indication for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) may influence the expected postoperative course, there is limited data comparing how length of stay (LOS) and disposition for patients with myelopathy differ from those with radiculopathy. This study aimed to compare LOS and discharge disposition, in patients undergoing ACDF for cervical radiculopathy versus those for myelopathy., Methods: A retrospective review of all adult ACDF cases between 2013 and 2019 was conducted analyzing sex, age, race, comorbidities, level of surgery, myelopathy measures when applicable, complications, dysphagia, hospital LOS, and discharge disposition., Results: A total of 157 patients were included in the study with 73 patients undergoing an ACDF for radiculopathy and 84 for myelopathy. Univariate analysis determined older age (p < 0.01), male sex (p = 0.03), presence of CKD (p < 0.01) or COPD (p = 0.01), surgery at C3/4 level (p = 0.01), and indication (p < 0.01) as predictors for a discharge to either acute rehabilitation or a skilled nursing facility rather than to home. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated age and indication as the only independent predictors of disposition, with home disposition being more likely with decreased age (OR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.86-0.98) and radiculopathy as the diagnosis (OR 6.72, 95 % CI 1.22- 37.02)., Conclusions: Myelopathic patients, as compared to those with radiculopathy at presentation, had significantly longer LOS, increased dysphagia, and were more often discharged to a facility. Understanding these two distinct populations as separate entities will streamline the pre and post-surgical care as the current DRG codes and ICD 10 PCS do not differentiate the expected post-operative course in patients undergoing ACDF for myelopathy versus radiculopathy., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) to activate nerves and muscles in paralyzed extremities has considerable promise to improve outcome after neurological disease or injury, especially in individuals who have upper motor nerve dysfunction due to central nervous system pathology. Because technology has improved, a wide variety of methods for providing electrical stimulation to create functional movements have been developed, including muscle stimulating electrodes, nerve stimulating electrodes, and hybrid constructs. However, in spite of decades of success in experimental settings with clear functional improvements for individuals with paralysis, the technology has not yet reached widespread clinical translation. In this review, we outline the history of FES techniques and approaches and describe future directions in evolution of the technology., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Anemia has been reported in nearly 40% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients and is linked to significant morbidity and disability. The presence of anemia is associated with worse outcomes in AIS, specifically in the presence of large vessel occlusion (LVO). An optimal hemoglobin (Hb) target specific to this pathology has not yet been established. The goal of this review is to systematically review literature that observes the association that exists between AIS outcomes and hemoglobin (Hb) levels., Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) to identify studies from 2008-2022. The following inclusion and exclusion criteria were used: studies of adult patients with AIS; must describe outcomes with regard to Hb levels in AIS (not limited to LVO); must be written in English. The clinical variables extracted included Length of Stay (LOS), modified rankin score (mRS), Hb levels, and mortality., Results: A total of 1,154 studies were gathered, with 116 undergoing full text review. 31 studies were included in this review. The age of patients ranged from 61.4 to 77.8. The presence of anemia in AIS increased LOS by 1.7 days on average and these patients also have a 15.2% higher rate of mortality at one year, on average., Discussion: This data suggests that the contemporary thresholds for treating anemia in AIS patients may be inadequate because anemia is strongly associated with poor outcomes (e.g., mRS>2 or mortality) and increased LOS in AIS patients. The current generalized Hb threshold for transfusion (7 g/dL) is also used in AIS patients, however, a more aggressive transfusion parameter should be further explored based on these findings. Further studies are required to confirm these findings and to determine if a more liberal RBCT threshold will result in clinical benefits., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2023 Desai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: Following spinal fusion surgery, routine imaging is often obtained in all patients regardless of clinical presentation. Such routine imaging may include x-ray, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging studies in both the immediate postoperative period and after discharge. The clinical utility of this practice is questionable. Our goal is to assess the existing literature for evidence of impact on clinical care from routine radiographic surveillance following spinal fusion., Methods: A systematic search of Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, and Ovid databases was performed for studies investigating postoperative imaging following spinal fusion surgery. Studies were analyzed for imaging findings and rates of change in management due to imaging., Results: In total, the review identified 9 studies that separated data by unique patient or by unique clinic visits. The 4 studies reporting per-patient data totaled 475 patients with 328 (69%) receiving routine imaging. Among these, 28 (8.5%) patients had abnormal routine findings with no patients having a change to their clinical course. Of the 5 studies that reported clinic visit data, 3119 patient visits were included with 2365 (76%) clinic visits accompanied by imaging. Across these 5 studies, 146 (6.2%) visits noted abnormal imaging with only 12 (0.5%) subsequent management changes., Conclusions: Our analysis found that routine imaging after spinal fusion surgery had no direct benefit on clinical management. The utility of baseline imaging for long-term comparison and medicolegal concerns were not studied and remain up to the provider's judgment. Further research is necessary to identify optimal imaging criteria following spinal fusion surgery., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to resection for treating multiple brain metastases. Given the lack of consensus regarding the application of SRS versus resection for multiple brain metastases, the authors aimed to conduct a systematic literature review of all published work on the topic., Methods: The PubMed, OVID, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were used to identify studies that examined clinical outcomes after resection or SRS was performed in patients with multiple brain metastases. Radiological studies, case series with fewer than 3 patients, pediatric studies, or national database studies were excluded. Data extracted included patient demographics and mean overall survival (OS). Weighted t-tests and ANOVA were performed., Results: A total of 1300 abstracts were screened, 450 articles underwent full-text review, and 129 studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 20,177 patients (18,852 treated with SRS and 1325 who underwent resection). The OS for the SRS group was 10.2 ± 6 months, and for the resection group it was 6.5 ± 3.8 months. A weighted ANOVA test comparing OS with covariates of age, sex, and publication year revealed that the treatment group (p = 0.045), age (p = 0.034), and publication year (0.0078) were all independently associated with OS (with SRS, younger age, and later publication year being associated with longer survival), whereas sex (p = 0.95) was not., Conclusions: For patients with multiple brain metastases, SRS and resection are effective treatments to prolong OS, with published data suggesting that SRS may have a trend toward lengthened survival outcomes. The authors encourage additional work examining outcomes of treatments for multiple brain metastases.

Introduction: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is most caused by lumbar disc herniation, and the associated treatment involves prompt surgical decompression. Rarer causes of CES include perineural (Tarlov) cysts., Clinical Presentation: A 62-year-old female with history of rheumatoid arthritis, hip and knee replacements, and chronic low back pain presented with worsening back pain, left leg weakness and pain for 6 weeks, and bowel/bladder incontinence with diminished sensation in the perianal region for 24 h prior to presentation. MRI demonstrated severe spinal stenosis at L4-S1, central disc herniation at L5-S1, and compression of the cauda equina, consistent with CES. A lumbar decompression was performed. Patient did well at 2-week follow up, but presented 5 weeks post-discharge with increased left leg pain/weakness and genitalia anesthesia. Imaging was unremarkable. Two months later, the patient presented with diminished sensation in the buttocks and bilateral lower extremities and bowel/bladder incontinence. Imaging demonstrated a large cystic presacral mass with involvement of the left sciatic foramen and S3 neural foramen. A team of plastic, orthopedic, and neurological surgeons performed an S3 sacral laminectomy, foraminotomy, partial sacrectomy, and S3 rhizotomy, and excision of the large left hemorrhagic pudendal mass. Final pathology demonstrated a perineural cyst with organizing hemorrhage. On follow-up, the patient's pain and weakness improved., Conclusion: CES-like symptoms were initially attributed to a herniated disk. However, lumbar decompression did not resolve symptoms, prompting further radiographic evaluation at two separate presentations. This represents the first reported case of a pudendal tumor causing symptoms initially attributed to a herniated disc., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society.)

Background: Centers of excellence (COEs) are interdisciplinary healthcare organizations created with the goal of improving health/economic outcomes in medical treatment for both individuals and health systems, compared to traditionally structured counterparts. Multiple studies have highlighted both societal/individual burdens associated with back pain, underscoring the importance of identifying new avenues for improving both cost/clinical outcomes for this patient population. Here, we utilize available literature to better characterize the features of a spine COE at a tertiary care center and determine the impact of COEs on patient satisfaction and outcomes., Methods: A systematic review describing spine COEs was performed. PubMed, OVID, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus were utilized for electronic literature search. Data including institution, department, pathologies treated, patient satisfaction scores, patient outcomes, and descriptions of the COE, were extracted and analyzed by two reviewers per full-text article. Inclusion criteria consisted of literature describing the organization, purpose, or outcomes of a spine COE, all publication types (except technical/operative report), adult or pediatric patients, publication from inception through September 2021. Exclusion criteria consisted of articles that do not discuss spinal COEs, technical/operative reports, studies unavailable in English language, unavailable full text, or non-human subjects. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies., Results: Five hundred and sixty-seven unique publications were obtained from the literature search. Of these articles, 20 were included and 547 were excluded based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Following full-text review of the 20 publications, 6 contained pertinent data. Quantitative data comparing COE versus non-COE was contradictory in comparing complication rates and episodic costs. Qualitative data included descriptions of spine COE features and cited improved patient care, technical advancements, and individualized care paths as positive aspects of the COE model. Mean risk of bias assessment was 3.67., Discussion: There is little evidence regarding if spine COEs provide an advantage over traditionally organized facilities. The current number and heterogeneity of publications, and lack of standardized metrics used to define a spinal COE are limiting factors. Spinal COE may offer higher value care, reduced complication rates and advancements in knowledge and technical skill., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jss.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jss-21-46/coif). GS presently receives consulting fees as a Stryker consultant. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Study Design: Retrospective review at a single institution of all adult patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative spinal disease from 2013 to 2018. Reoperation rates and change in clinical management due to routine imaging findings were the primary outcomes., Objective: To investigate what effects immediate routine postoperative imaging has on the clinical management of patients following lumbar fusion surgery., Summary of Background Data: The clinical utility of routine postoperative imaging following lumbar fusion surgery remains uncertain. Existing studies on the clinical utility of postoperative imaging in lumbar fusion patients have largely focused on imaging obtained post-discharge. We present a retrospective analysis that to our knowledge is the first study reporting on the clinical utility of routine imaging in lumbar fusion patients during the immediate postoperative period., Methods: The medical records of patients who had undergone elective lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative disease from 2013 to 2018 by neurosurgeons across one regional healthcare system were retrospectively analyzed. Inpatient records and imaging orders for patients were reviewed. Routine immediate postoperative imaging was defined by any lumbar spine imaging prior to discharge in the absence of specific indications., Results: Analysis identified 115 patients who underwent elective lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative disease. One-hundred-twelve patients received routine postoperative imaging. Routine imaging was abnormal in four patients (4%). There was one instance (<1%) where routine immediate postoperative imaging led to change in clinical management. Abnormal routine imaging was not associated with either reoperation or development of neurological symptoms postoperatively (P = 0.10), however, new or worsening neurologic deficits did predict reoperation (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: New neurologic deficit was the only significant predictor of reoperation. Routine imaging, whether normal or abnormal, was not found to be associated with reoperation. The practice of routine imaging prior to discharge following elective lumbar fusion surgery appears to provide little utility to clinical management.Level of Evidence: 3., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The objective of this study was to explore racial/ethnic factors that may be associated with survival in patients with glioblastoma by querying the National Cancer Database (NCDB)., Methods: The NCDB was queried for patients diagnosed with glioblastoma between 2004 and 2014. Patient demographic variables included age at diagnosis, sex, race, ethnicity, Charlson-Deyo score, insurance status, and rural/urban/metropolitan location of zip code. Treatment variables included surgical treatment, extent of resection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, type of radiation, and treatment facility type. Outcomes included 30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day mortality, and overall survival. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate variables associated with race and overall survival., Results: A total of 103 652 glioblastoma patients were identified. There was a difference in the proportion of patients for whom surgery was performed, as well as the proportion receiving radiation, when stratified by race ( P < .001). Black non-Hispanics had the highest rates of unplanned readmission (7.6%) within 30 days (odds ratio [OR]: 1.39 compared to White non-Hispanics, P < .001). Asian non-Hispanics had the lowest 30- (3.2%) and 90-day mortality (9.8%) when compared to other races (OR: 0.52 compared to White non-Hispanics, P = .031). Compared to White non-Hispanics, we found Black non-Hispanics (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.88, P < .001), Asian non-Hispanics (HR: 0.72, P < .001), and Hispanics (HR: 0.69, P < .001) had longer overall survival., Conclusions: Differences in treatment and outcomes exist between races. Further studies are needed to elucidate the etiology of these race-related disparities and to improve outcomes for all patients., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Objectives: Prone positioning has been shown to be a beneficial adjunctive supportive measure for patients who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome. Studies have excluded patients with reduced intracranial compliance, whereby patients with concomitant neurologic diagnoses and acute respiratory distress syndrome have no defined treatment algorithm or recommendations for management. In this study, we aim to determine the safety and feasibility of prone positioning in the neurologically ill patients., Design and Setting: A systematic review of the literature, performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses 2009 guidelines, yielded 10 articles for analysis. Using consensus from these articles, in combination with review of multi-institutional proning protocols for patients with nonneurologic conditions, a proning protocol for patients with intracranial pathology and concomitant acute respiratory distress syndrome was developed., Measurements and Main Results: Among 10 studies included in the final analysis, we found that prone positioning is safe and feasible in the neurologically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Increased intracranial pressure and compromised cerebral perfusion pressure may occur with prone positioning. We propose a prone positioning protocol for the neurologically ill patients who require frequent neurologic examinations and intracranial monitoring., Conclusions: Although elevations in intracranial pressure and reductions in cerebral perfusion pressure do occur during proning, they may not occur to a degree that would warrant exclusion of prone ventilation as a treatment modality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and concomitant neurologic diagnoses. In cases where intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, and brain tissue oxygenation can be monitored, prone position ventilation should be considered a safe and viable therapy., Competing Interests: Dr. Alkhachroum received funding from National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under the Miami Clinical and Translational Science Institute KL2 Career Development Award UL1TR002736. Dr. Sedney’s institution received funding from NIH/National Institute on Aging, and she received funding from Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen Foundation. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Background: The cingulum bundle (CB) has long been a target for psychiatric neurosurgical procedures, but with limited understanding of the brain networks being impacted. Recent advances in human tractography could provide a foundation to better understand the effects of neurosurgical interventions on the CB; however, the reliability of tractography remains in question., Objective: To evaluate the ability of different tractography techniques, derived from typical, human diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data, to characterize CB connectivity described in animal models. This will help validate the clinical applicability of tractography, and generate insight on current and future neurosurgical targets for psychiatric disorders., Methods: Connectivity of the CB in 15 healthy human subjects was evaluated using DWI-based tractography, and compared to tract-tracing findings from nonhuman primates. Brain regions of interest were defined to coincide with the animal model. Tractography was performed using 3 techniques (FSL probabilistic, Camino probabilistic, and Camino deterministic). Differences in connectivity were assessed, and the CB segment with the greatest connectivity was determined., Results: Each tractography technique successfully reproduced the animal tracing model with a mean accuracy of 72% (68-75%, P < .05). Additionally, one region of the CB, the rostral dorsal segment, had significantly greater connectivity to associated brain structures than all other CB segments (P < .05)., Conclusion: Noninvasive, in vivo human analysis of the CB, using clinically available DWI for tractography, consistently reproduced the results of an animal tract-tracing model. This suggests that tractography of the CB can be used for clinical applications, which may aid in neurosurgical targeting for psychiatric disorders., (Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Background: Idiopathic ventral thoracic spinal cord herniation is a rare condition that usually presents with progressive myelopathy or Brown-Séquard syndrome. More than 100 cases have been reported with significant variance in surgical treatment strategies and likewise, significant variance in patient outcomes. Although laminectomy has often been used, to date, there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach or strategy for ventral dural repair., Objective: To report and illustrate a novel approach to repair the ventral dural defect with more than 2 yr of clinical follow-up. The specific approach and graft used are both detailed., Methods: A retrospective chart review of all known cases of idiopathic spinal cord herniation at the Cleveland Clinic over the last 15 yr was performed. Postoperative outcome scores (including the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, European Myelopathy score, and Nurick) were calculated preoperatively and postoperatively., Results: A total of 5 patients were identified. Four of five patients improved clinically after surgery and 1 patient remained unchanged at last follow-up (average 23.2 mo, range 12-60 mo). There were no complications. All patients had postoperative magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating realignment of the spinal cord and no recurrence of tethering., Conclusion: A unilateral dorsolateral, transpedicular approach combined with laminectomy provides excellent exposure for ventral or ventrolateral dural defects associated with idiopathic spinal cord herniation and minimizes spinal cord manipulation. A collagen matrix graft used as an onlay between the spinal cord and ventral dural defect is a safe and effective option for ventral dural repair., (Copyright © 2018 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.)

Objective: Providing durable long-term pain control for patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is challenging. A multidisciplinary approach focused on physical therapy is frequently prescribed, with opioids and invasive procedures reserved for those challenged by functional progression. In this study, we examined the long-term efficacy of intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDS) in patients with CRPS at our institution., Methods: Patients with CRPS implanted with an IDDS between 2000 and 2013 who had four or more years of continuous follow-up were included in the analysis. The outcome variables of interest were pain intensity and oral opioid intake. The primary predictor of interest was dose of intrathecal opioids, with ziconotide, bupivacaine, and clonidine characterized as binary secondary predictors., Results: Of the 1,653 IDDS identified, 62 were implanted primarily for CRPS-related pain. Of these, 26 had four or more years of complete follow-up data. Pain scores did not significantly decrease over time, and we observed no correlation between pain intensity and use of any intrathecal medication. Although oral opioid intake decreased over time, intrathecal opioid dose did not affect oral opioid consumption. Ziconotide was associated with a hastening of the decrease in oral opioid intake, whereas the presence of bupivacaine paradoxically increased oral opioid intake., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that intrathecal opioid dose was not associated with long-term decreases in oral opioid intake. Additionally, ziconotide was associated with a decrease in oral opioid intake over the four-year follow-up, and bupivacaine was associated with an increase in oral opioid intake. Our study examines the long-term effectiveness of intrathecal medications in managing pain in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. We present a detailed follow-up over four years for 26 patients, tracking oral opiate intake, pain scores, and intrathecal pump settings. Our findings suggest that intrathecal opiates may not be effective in reducing oral opiate intake, ziconotide may hasten a decrease in intake, and bupivacaine may lead to an increase in intake., (© 2018 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The treatment of psychiatric patients presents significant challenges to the clinical community, and a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management is essential to facilitate optimal care. In particular, the neurosurgical treatment of psychiatric disorders, or "psychosurgery," has held fascination throughout human history as a potential method of influencing behavior and consciousness. Early evidence of such procedures can be traced to prehistory, and interest flourished in the nineteenth and early twentieth century with greater insight into cerebral functional and anatomic localization. However, any discussion of psychosurgery invariably invokes controversy, as the widespread and indiscriminate use of the transorbital lobotomy in the mid-twentieth century resulted in profound ethical ramifications that persist to this day. The concurrent development of effective psychopharmacological treatments virtually eliminated the need and desire for psychosurgical procedures, and accordingly the research and practice of psychosurgery was dormant, but not forgotten. There has been a recent resurgence of interest for non-ablative therapies, due in part to modern advances in functional and structural neuroimaging and neuromodulation technology. In particular, deep brain stimulation is a promising treatment paradigm with the potential to modulate abnormal pathways and networks implicated in psychiatric disease states. Although there is enthusiasm regarding these recent advancements, it is important to reflect on the scientific, social, and ethical considerations of this controversial field.

OBJECTIVE Spine surgeons in the United States continue to be overwhelmed by an aging population, and patients are waiting weeks to months for appointments. With a finite number of clinic visits per surgeon, analysis of referral sources needs to be explored. In this study, the authors evaluated patient referrals and their yield for surgical volume at a tertiary care center. METHODS This is a retrospective study of new patient visits by the spine surgery group at the Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health from 2011 to 2016. Data on all new or consultation visits for 5 identified spinal surgeons at the Center for Spine Health were collected. Patients with an identifiable referral source and who were at least 18 years of age at initial visit were included in this study. Univariate analysis was used to identify demographic differences among referral groups, and then multivariate analysis was used to evaluate those referral groups as significant predictors of surgical yield. RESULTS After adjusting for demographic differences across all referrals, multivariate analysis identified physician referrals as more likely (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.04-2.10, p = 0.0293) to yield a surgical case than self-referrals. General practitioner referrals (OR 0.5616, 95% CI 0.3809-0.8278, p = 0.0036) were identified as less likely to yield surgical cases than referrals from interventionalists (OR 1.5296, p = 0.058) or neurologists (OR 1.7498, 95% CI 1.0057-3.0446, p = 0.0477). Additionally, 2 demographic factors, including distance from home and age, were identified as predictors of surgery. Local patients (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29, p = 0.018) and those 65 years of age or older (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.87, p = 0.0023) were both more likely to need surgery after establishing care with a spine surgeon. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, referrals from general practitioners and self-referrals are important areas where focused triaging may be necessary. Further research into midlevel providers and nonsurgical spine provider's role in these referrals for spine pathology is needed. Patients from outside of the state or younger than 65 years could benefit from pre-visit screening as well to optimize a surgeon's clinic time use and streamline patient care.