1. Comparing the performance of DeoxyriboNucleic Acid methylation analysis and cytology for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in women with high-risk human papillomavirus-positive status in a gynecologic outpatient population.
- Author
-
Tao H, Yu F, Yang L, Pei X, Mao S, and Fan X
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Adult, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Colposcopy, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Human papillomavirus 16 genetics, Human papillomavirus 16 isolation & purification, ROC Curve, Human papillomavirus 18 genetics, Human papillomavirus 18 isolation & purification, Sensitivity and Specificity, DNA, Viral analysis, DNA, Viral genetics, Cytodiagnosis methods, Paired Box Transcription Factors genetics, China, Vaginal Smears, Human Papillomavirus Viruses, DNA Methylation, Papillomavirus Infections virology, Papillomavirus Infections diagnosis, Papillomavirus Infections complications, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms virology, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms genetics, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia virology, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia diagnosis, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia genetics, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia pathology
- Abstract
Background: Primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) with cytological triage for women with non-16/18 hrHPV-positive status has become popular in China. However, cytology relies on the subjective judgment of pathologists, leading to inconsistent clinical performance., Methods: A total of 657 hrHPV-positive women aged 25-64 years were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All participants underwent colposcopic biopsy after cytology triage, with cytology residual specimens undergoing DNA methylation testing. CIN2+ and CIN3+ sensitivity and specificity were compared between the different triage strategies (n=487): PAX1 methylation (PAX1
m ) , Glycophorin C methylation (GYPCm ), cytology, and combinations between them or with HPV16/18., Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for PAX1m and GYPCm in detecting CIN2 or worse (CIN2+) were 0.867 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.796-0.937) and 0.873 (95% CI: 0.808-0.938), respectively. The sensitivities of PAX1m and GYPCm were consistent with those of cytology for both CIN2+ and CIN3+ detection. The relative specificities of PAX1m and GYPCm for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 2.83 (95% CI: 2.33-2.45) and 3.09 (95% CI: 2.40-3.98), respectively. The relative specificities of combining HPV 16/18 with PAX1m and GYPCm for CIN2+ detection compared to cytology were 3.38 (95% CI: 2.96-3.86) and 3.67 (95% CI: 3.15-4.27), respectively. Compared to low levels of DNA methylation, high levels of PAX1m and GYPCm resulted in odd ratios (ORs) of 57.66 (95% CI: 13.57-409.12, p < 0.001) and 23.87 (95% CI: 6.49-115.42, p < 0.001) for CIN3+, adjusted for HPV 16/18 and cytology results., Conclusions: PAX1m and GYPCm demonstrated superior ability to identify cervical precancerous lesions and cervical cancer, with AUC values exceeding 0.85. For detecting CIN2+/CIN3+ in women with hrHPV-positive status, DNA methylation (combined with HPV 16/18) showed higher specificity than cytology (combined with HPV 16/18) and is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting cervical (pre)cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF