Search

BackgroundA minority of medical centers possess a dedicated endocrine surgery program. Here we assess the short-term impact of a new endocrine surgery program on institutional case volumes and financial endpoints.MethodsWe studied all endocrine procedures performed over a 5-year period spanning the inception of the endocrine surgery program at UCLA. Institutional and state-level data on patient geographic origin, discharges for endocrine diagnosis-related groups (DRGs), and hospital-side charges and costs were examined.ResultsTotal endocrine case volume increased 112% (264 to 559 cases annually) over the study period. The relative increase was greater for parathyroid (56 to 196, 250%, P < 0.0001) and adrenal (11 to 31, 181%, P = 0.06) procedures compared to thyroid procedures (317 to 442, 39%). The endocrine case volume of nonspecialist surgeons remained stable over the study period. Growth in referrals arose from previously unrepresented zip codes and was associated with an increase in the mean distance traveled for care (2006, 44 miles vs. 2009, 92 miles, P < 0.01). In each DRG, UCLA attained the top market position within one year of the program's inception, corresponding to an overall 27% increase in regional market share. Total hospital charges for endocrine DRGs rose 161% to $14.7 million annually, while the cost of parathyroid surgery fell 34% (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe establishment of an academic endocrine surgery program can cause fundamental shifts in referral patterns within a competitive, densely populated metropolitan environment. Hospitals should consider the inclusion of an endocrine surgery program in strategic planning initiatives.

Background: Several cadaveric studies demonstrate reliable localization of the transverse sinus and the transverse sigmoid junction (TSJ). These studies use the line drawn from the inion to the posterior root of the zygoma (IZ) and the asterion, respectively. We investigated how the size difference between the right and left transverse sinuses (TS) and sigmoid sinuses (SS) affected the accuracy of their respective superficial landmarks, particularly with regards to where this relationship may result in unsafe and/or complicated surgical access., Methods: We utilized Vitrea software to render three-dimensional images based on computed tomographic angiography (CTA). We measured the relationship between the TS and SS to their respective superficial landmarks., Results: We analyzed 50 patients in this study. The distal TS was found caudal to the inion-to-zygoma (IZ) line on average by 5.0 ± 4.3 mm on the right and 6.4 ± 9.3 mm on the left. The mid TS was found cranial on average 3.5 ± 5.7 mm on the right and 3.2 ± 6.0 mm cranial on the left to the superior nuchal line (SNL). The distance from the asterion to the SS was 11.5 ± 2.4 mm medial on the right and 12.1 ± 4.4 mm medial on the left. The average distance was greater on the left than the right when using the IZ landmark. This was directly proportional to the size difference of the sinuses ( r 2 = 0.15, P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Statistically significant differences between the right and left TS and SS were seen in terms of size. This appeared to correlate nicely to the differences observed between the locations of the TSs' and their respective superficial landmarks., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Study Design: Retrospective review., Objective: The objective of the study was to determine the morbidity and mortality rate associated with same day versus staged cervical circumferential approach., Summary of Background Data: A combined approach to the cervical spine is often indicated for complex cervical pathologies. Previous studies suggested superior results associated with same day combined surgery for thoracolumbar patients. This study examines the usefulness of p-Physiological and Operative Severity Score for enumeration of Morbidity and Mortality (POSSUM), an estimated mortality risk assessment for cervical spine patients and will compare same day surgery to staged procedures., Methods: This is a retrospective chart review including patients who underwent ventral and dorsal approach within 2 weeks. Estimated mortality was calculated using p-POSSUM. The cohort was divided into same day surgery group and staged group. Risk factors were compared between groups. Mean p-POSSUM was calculated and compared with the actual mortality rate. Univariate analysis was used to compare the risk factors between groups and the groups' outcomes. Multivariable analysis was used to adjust for risk factor differences when comparing group outcomes., Results: One hundred thirty-five patients were included, 106 patients were in the same day surgery group whereas 29 patients were in the staged group. Mean p-POSSUM was 2.8% predicted mortality with a 95% confidence interval of 1.6% to 4.1%. The actual mortality rate was 3.7%. The groups did not vary in most risk factors assessed. Univariate analysis demonstrated a statistically significantly higher rate of major complications (0.62 vs. 0.34, P=0.0369), infection (41.4% vs. 9.4%, P<0.0001), and length of hospital stay (9.3 vs. 6.8 d, P=0.0120) in the staged group. Multivariable analysis demonstrated significantly higher infection rate in the staged group., Conclusions: P-POSSUM mortality estimate may serve as a useful and valid tool for spine surgery studies. Staged combined cervical surgery harbors a higher complication rate and may be associated with lengthier hospitalization.