1. A scoring system for 3D surface images of breast reconstruction developed using the Delphi consensus process
- Author
-
Fiona MacNeill, Simon H. Wood, Jennifer Rusby, Stuart James, and Amy R. Godden
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Aesthetic/reconstruction/breast/cancer ,Delphi Technique ,Esthetics ,Mammaplasty ,media_common.quotation_subject ,education ,Delphi method ,Breast Neoplasms ,030230 surgery ,Article ,03 medical and health sciences ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,0302 clinical medicine ,PROMS, patient reported outcome measures ,Voting ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,Humans ,Medicine ,Medical physics ,Patient Reported Outcome Measures ,ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient ,Mastectomy ,Reliability (statistics) ,media_common ,computer.programming_language ,business.industry ,MOT, Medical Outcomes Trust ,Gold standard ,wκ, weighted kappa ,BCT, breast conserving treatment ,Reproducibility of Results ,NAC, nipple areola complex ,General Medicine ,ABS, association of breast surgery ,Oncology ,Physical Appearance, Body ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Scale (social sciences) ,Female ,Surgery ,Patient-reported outcome ,business ,Breast reconstruction ,computer ,3D-SI, 3-dimensional surface imaging ,Delphi - Abstract
Introduction Evaluation of aesthetics after breast reconstruction is challenging. In the absence of an objective measurement, panel assessment is widely adopted. Heterogeneity of scales and poor internal consistency make comparison difficult. Development and validation of an expert panel scale using a Delphi consensus process is described. It was designed specifically for use as the gold standard for development of an objective evaluation tool using 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging (3D-SI). Materials and methods 20 items relating to aesthetic assessment were identified for consideration in the Delphi consensus process. Items were selected for inclusion in the definitive panel scale by iterative rounds of voting according to importance, consensus discussion, and a final vote. The Delphi-derived scale was tested on a clinical research series for intra- and inter-panellist, and intra-panel reliability, and correlation with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Results 61 surgeons participated in the Delphi process. Oncoplastic and plastic surgeons were represented. The Delphi-derived scale included symmetry, volume, shape, position of breast mound, nipple position, and a global score. Intra-panellist reliability ranged from poor to almost perfect (wκ, Highlights • Aesthetic outcome has well described influence on long term quality of life • Many scoring systems exist, each with methodological flaws. • A Delphi consensus process was used to derive a contemporary panel scoring system for expert aesthetic evaluation • The scoring system was tested and performed well on a series of images of women who have undergone breast reconstruction
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF