1. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry
- Author
-
Jan Luebke, Alexandra Anton, Thomas Wecker, M. Neuburger, Daniel Boehringer, J. F. Jordan, Thomas Reinhard, and L. Bryniok
- Subjects
Male ,Applanation tonometry ,Intraocular pressure ,medicine.medical_specialty ,genetic structures ,Glaucoma ,Ocular hypertension ,Goldmann applanation tonometry ,Tonometry, Ocular ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Ophthalmology ,medicine ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,Prospective cohort study ,Intraocular Pressure ,Aged ,Measurement method ,business.industry ,Significant difference ,Reproducibility of Results ,Equipment Design ,medicine.disease ,eye diseases ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,Female ,Ocular Hypertension ,sense organs ,business ,human activities ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement can be performed with different methods. Newer methods have to be compared to the standard method, the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). We herein compare two air-puff tonometers, the non-contact tonometer (Tomey NCT) and the Corvis ST (CST) with GAT in eyes with a broad spectrum of IOP. Two hundred and forty-nine eyes of 249 patients (with diagnosis of either glaucoma or ocular hypertension) were included in this monocenter prospective cohort study. Each eye underwent IOP measurements via GAT, NCT and CST. Bland–Altman plots were calculated to compare the different methods in the three groups. Paired t tests were used for statistical comparison between the three measurement methods. The difference between the different methods was tested on correlation against central corneal thickness (CCT). Mean IOP in GAT was 17.6 mmHg (standard deviation (SD) 5.9), 16.3 mmHg (SD 5.6) in NCT and 18.0 mmHg (SD 5.5) in CST. Comparisons between GAT and CST vs. NCT showed significant differences (p
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF