Search

Dyspnea is a common and debilitating symptom that affects many different patient populations. Dyspnea measures should assess multiple domains.To evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of an ultra-brief, multi-dimensional dyspnea measure.We adapted the DEG from the PEG, a valid 3-item pain measure, to assess average dyspnea intensity (D), interference with enjoyment of life (E), and dyspnea burden with general activity (G).We used data from a multi-site randomized clinical trial among outpatients with heart failure.We evaluated reliability (Cronbach's alpha), concurrent validity with the Memorial-Symptom-Assessment-Scale (MSAS) shortness-of-breath distress-orbothersome item and 7-item Generalized-Anxiety-Disorder (GAD-7) scale, knowngroups validity with New-York-Heart-Association-Functional-Classification (NYHA) 1-2 or 3-4 and presence or absence of comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), responsiveness with the MSAS item as an anchor, and calculated a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using distribution methods.Among 312 participants, the DEG was reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.92). The mean (standard deviation) DEG score was 5.26 (2.36) (range 0-10) points. DEG scores correlated strongly with the MSAS shortness of breath distress-or-bothersome item (r=0.66) and moderately with GAD-7 categories (ρ=0.36). DEG scores were statistically significantly lower among patients with NYHA 1-2 compared to 3-4 [mean difference (standard error): 1.22 (0.27) points, p0.01], and those without compared to with comorbid COPD [0.87 (0.27) points, p0.01]. The DEG was highly sensitive to change, with MCID of 0.59-1.34 points, or 11-25% change.The novel, ultra-brief DEG measure is reliable, valid, and highly responsive. Future studies should evaluate the DEG's sensitivity to interventions, use anchor-based methods to triangulate MCID estimates, and determine its prognostic usefulness among patients with chronic cardiopulmonary and other diseases.

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a rare, irreversible, and progressive disease of the lungs. Common genetic variants, in addition to non-genetic factors, have been consistently associated with IPF. Rare variants identified by candidate gene, family-based, and exome studies have also been reported to associate with IPF. However, the extent to which rare variants genome-wide may contribute to the risk of IPF remains unknown. Objectives: We used whole-genome sequencing to investigate the role of rare variants, genome-wide, on IPF risk. Methods: As part of the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine Program, we sequenced 2,180 cases of IPF. Association testing focused on the aggregated effect of rare variants (minor allele frequency ≤0.01) within genes or regions. We also identified individual variants that are influential within genes and estimated the heritability of IPF based on rare and common variants. Measurements and Main Results: Rare variants in both TERT and RTEL1 were significantly associated with IPF. A single rare variant in each of the TERT and RTEL1 genes was found to consistently influence the aggregated test statistics. There was no significant evidence of association with other previously reported rare variants. The SNP-heritability of IPF was estimated to be 32% (s.e. 3%). Conclusions: Rare variants within the TERT and RTEL1 genes and well-established common variants have the largest contribution to IPF risk overall. Efforts in risk profiling or development of therapies for IPF that focus on TERT, RTEL1, common variants, and environmental risk factors are likely to have the largest impact on this complex disease.

Background: In the past two decades, many advances have been made to our understanding of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the way we approach its treatment. Despite this, many questions remain unanswered, particularly those related to how the disease and its therapies impact outcomes that are most important to patients. There is currently a lack of guidance on how to best define and incorporate these patient-centered outcomes in ILD research. Objectives: To summarize the current state of patient-centered outcomes research in ILD, identify gaps in knowledge and research, and highlight opportunities and methods for future patient-centered research agendas in ILD. Methods: An international interdisciplinary group of experts was assembled. The group identified top patient-centered outcomes in ILD, reviewed available literature for each outcome, highlighted important discoveries and knowledge gaps, and formulated research recommendations. Results: The committee identified seven themes around patient-centered outcomes as the focus of the statement. After a review of the literature and expert committee discussion, we developed 28 research recommendations. Conclusions: Patient-centered outcomes are key to ascertaining whether and how ILD and interventions used to treat it affect the way patients feel and function in their daily lives. Ample opportunities exist to conduct additional work dedicated to elevating and incorporating patient-centered outcomes in ILD research.

Objectives This study sought to determine the level of understanding and opinion among rheumatologist and pulmonologists regarding risk factors, diagnostic approach and treatment of RA-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Methods We conducted an international electronic survey of rheumatologists and pulmonologists utilizing two separate Redcap-based surveys with questions on the epidemiology, workup and management of RA-ILD as well as ILD screening questions using case-based scenarios directed at rheumatologists. The survey also collected demographic data on participants including their practice setting, years in practice and country of practice. Results We received a total of 616 responses (354 rheumatologists and 262 pulmonologists) from six continents. There were significant differences in responses between pulmonologists and rheumatologists in estimated prevalence and mortality, risk factors for the development of ILD in RA and medications that are effective or should be avoided. Rheumatologists were much less likely to consider assessment for ILD in high risk, asymptomatic patients compared with high-risk patients with either symptoms or exam findings suggestive of ILD. Conclusion Our study brought to light the variability in disease assessment and clinical practice among providers caring for patients with RA-ILD and indicate that greater education is needed to optimize clinical decision making in the risk assessment, screening and treatment of RA-ILD. Research questions that address appropriate screening and treatment strategies for RA-ILD will be valuable for rheumatologists given their central role in the overall health and lung health of patients with RA.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immunologically mediated form of lung disease resulting from inhalational exposure to any of a large variety of antigens. A subgroup of patients with HP develops pulmonary fibrosis (fibrotic HP; FHP), a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the antifibrotic pirfenidone in treating FHP. This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial is enrolling adults with FHP (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02958917). Study participants must have fibrotic abnormalities involving ≥5% of the lung parenchyma on high-resolution computed tomography scan, forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥40% and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ≥30% of predicted values. Study participants will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone 2403 mg·day−1 or placebo. The primary efficacy end-point is the mean change in FVC % predicted from baseline to week 52. A number of secondary end-points have been chosen to evaluate the safety and efficacy in different domains., The design of a phase II study of 52 weeks of pirfenidone or placebo on top of standard of care in patients with fibrotic HP (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02958917) https://bit.ly/32CfeSF

The Living with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-IPF) questionnaire was developed with substantial input from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) to assess symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Because IPF is the prototypical chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a progressive phenotype, we expanded applicability of the L-IPF by deleting the word “idiopathic”, creating the L-PF (Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis) questionnaire, and then assessed its relevance among patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs in one-to-one interviews.Patients in the USA and Germany with any progressive fibrosing ILD other than IPF were asked about their disease and symptoms, completed the 44-item L-PF questionnaire (comprising two modules that assess symptoms and impacts of disease) and then answered a series of debriefing questions. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded for qualitative content analysis.20 patients were interviewed, but time constraints meant not all were asked about all items. The most frequent diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis-associated ILD (25%) and mixed connective tissue disease-associated ILD (20%). Almost all patients endorsed the symptoms assessed by the L-PF: shortness of breath (19 out of 20 patients), cough (19 out of 20) and fatigue (18 out of 20). Most patients endorsed impacts of progressive fibrosing ILD on activities of daily living, physical well-being, sleep, emotional well-being, and social aspects of their lives. Most patients had an overall positive impression of the Symptoms module and understood items as intended. All seven patients asked understood the items of the Impacts module.The L-PF contains concepts relevant and important to patients with progressive fibrosing ILD, and items are understood as intended.

Background The prevalence of burnout and depressive symptoms is high among physician trainees. Research Question What is the burden of burnout and depressive symptoms among fellows training in pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) and what are associated individual fellow, program, and institutional characteristics? Study Design and Methods We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of fellows enrolled in pulmonary, PCCM, and critical care medicine training programs in the United States to assess burnout and depressive symptoms. Burnout symptoms were measured using the Maslach Burnout Index two-item measure. The two-item Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Procedure was used to screen for depressive symptoms. For each of the two outcomes (burnout and depressive symptoms), we constructed three multivariate logistic regression models to assess individual fellow characteristics, program structure, and institutional polices associated with either burnout or depressive symptoms. Results Five hundred two of the 976 fellows who received the survey completed it—including both outcome measures—giving a response rate of 51%. Fifty percent of fellows showed positive results for either burnout or depressive symptoms, with 41% showing positive results for depressive symptoms, 32% showing positive results for burnout, and 23% showing positive results for both. Reporting a coverage system in the case of personal illness or emergency (adjusted OR [aOR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.73) and access to mental health services (aOR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.47) were associated with lower odds of burnout. Financial concern was associated with higher odds of depressive symptoms (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.22). Working more than 70 hours in an average clinical week and the burdens of electronic health record (EHR) documentation were associated with a higher odds of both burnout and depressive symptoms. Interpretation Given the high prevalence of burnout and depressive symptoms among fellows training in PCCM, an urgent need exists to identify solutions that address this public health crisis. Strategies such as providing an easily accessible coverage system, access to mental health resources, reducing EHR burden, addressing work hours, and addressing financial concerns among trainees may help to reduce burnout or depressive symptoms and should be studied further by the graduate medical education community.

Rationale: Several new drugs for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are in development. Tools are needed to assess whether these drugs benefit patients on outcomes that matter most to them. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is one such outcome. It is influenced by many factors, but symptoms and their impacts are two strong drivers. Objectives: To develop a questionnaire to assess symptoms, disease impacts, and HRQL specifically for patients with IPF. Methods: Working with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration through the Drug Development Tool Qualification process, focus groups, concept elicitation, and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to inform the development of a 44-item pilot questionnaire. The pilot paper-and-pen questionnaire was migrated to an equivalent electronic version and field-tested in a 14-day study. Response data were subjected to psychometric testing, including exploratory factor analysis, item calibration using item response theory models, test-retest reliability, and validity testing. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 125 patients with IPF (62.4% men) completed the longitudinal study. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 69 ± 7.60 years, and the mean FVC% predicted was 71 ± 20.0. After factor and item analyses, 35 items were retained, and these comprise the two modules (symptoms and impacts) of the Living with IPF (L-IPF) questionnaire. The L-IPF yields five scales demonstrating good psychometric properties, including correlation with concurrently collected FVC% predicted and the ability to discriminate between patients with differing levels of IPF severity. Conclusions: The L-IPF is a new questionnaire that assesses symptoms, disease impacts, and HRQL in patients with IPF.

Background: Evidence-based guidelines are needed for effective delivery of home oxygen therapy to appropriate patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: The multidisciplinary panel created six research questions using a modified Delphi approach. A systematic review of the literature was completed, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was used to formulate clinical recommendations. Recommendations: The panel found varying quality and availability of evidence and made the following judgments: 1) strong recommendations for long-term oxygen use in patients with COPD (moderate-quality evidence) or ILD (low-quality evidence) with severe chronic resting hypoxemia, 2) a conditional recommendation against long-term oxygen use in patients with COPD with moderate chronic resting hypoxemia, 3) conditional recommendations for ambulatory oxygen use in patients with COPD (moderate-quality evidence) or ILD (low-quality evidence) with severe exertional hypoxemia, 4) a conditional recommendation for ambulatory liquid-oxygen use in patients who are mobile outside the home and require >3 L/min of continuous-flow oxygen during exertion (very-low-quality evidence), and 5) a recommendation that patients and their caregivers receive education on oxygen equipment and safety (best-practice statement). Conclusions: These guidelines provide the basis for evidence-based use of home oxygen therapy in adults with COPD or ILD but also highlight the need for additional research to guide clinical practice.

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that classically presents as a symmetrical inflammatory polyarthritis. Extra-articular manifestations are prevalent, with the lungs being the most common site [1], and interstitial lung disease (ILD) being the most severe form of pulmonary involvement. In some studies, the median survival of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is around 3 years (similar to that in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) [2, 3]); however, in other studies, median survival is >7 years [4, 5]. When present, ILD accounts for 10–20% of all deaths in rheumatoid arthritis [6]., Age of ILD onset is similar in patients with RA-UIP and RA-NSIP but duration of RA before ILD onset differs https://bit.ly/3lgjfDJ

IntroductionIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF, progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILD), are associated with a progressive loss of lung function and a poor prognosis. Treatment with antifibrotic agents can slow, but not halt, disease progression, and treatment discontinuation because of adverse events is common. Fibrotic diseases such as these can be mediated by lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which signals via six LPA receptors (LPA1–6). Signalling via LPA1 appears to be fundamental in the pathogenesis of fibrotic diseases. BMS-986278, a second-generation LPA1 antagonist, is currently in phase 2 development as a therapy for IPF and PF-ILD.Methods and analysisThis phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, international trial will include adults with IPF or PF-ILD. The trial will consist of a 42-day screening period, a 26-week placebo-controlled treatment period, an optional 26-week active-treatment extension period, and a 28-day post-treatment follow-up. Patients in both the IPF (n=240) and PF-ILD (n=120) cohorts will be randomised 1:1:1 to receive 30 mg or 60 mg BMS-986278, or placebo, administered orally two times per day for 26 weeks in the placebo-controlled treatment period. The primary endpoint is rate of change in per cent predicted forced vital capacity from baseline to week 26 in the IPF cohort.Ethics and disseminationThis study will be conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice guidelines, Declaration of Helsinki principles, and local ethical and legal requirements. Results will be reported in a peer-reviewed publication.Trial registration numberNCT04308681.

Rationale: Patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease often progress to the point of requiring supplemental oxygen. This is invariably accompanied by an impaired quality of life and limitatio...

To describe the phenotypic characteristics and natural history of patients with autoimmune forms of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Retrospective, descriptive, single-center study of patients with autoimmune forms of ILD evaluated between February 2008 and August 2014. All data were extracted from the electronic medical record. Longitudinal changes in forced vital capacity (FVC%) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco%) in percent predicted were analyzed and time-to-event analyses for death were performed using Cox regression. Of the entire cohort (n = 243), systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated ILD (n = 88, 36%), interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF, n = 56, 23%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated ILD (n = 42, 17%), and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM)-associated ILD (n = 26, 11%) were the most common phenotypes. The SSc-ILD, IIM-ILD, and IPAF groups had similar features: average age in the mid-50s, strongly female predominant and more likely to have nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). In contrast, RA-ILD patients were older, gender balanced, more likely to be past smokers and were UIP predominant. Adjusted longitudinal lung function was stable during a median follow-up period of nearly 4 years and the independent predictors for death were older age (p = 0.003), male sex (p = 0.019), and lower FVC (p =

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common systemic autoimmune disease whose fibro-inflammatory manifestations may affect a number of tissues and organs, including the lungs. In fact, interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a leading cause of mortality among patients with RA. RA-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) most often presents in an injury pattern called usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), which portends a relatively worse prognosis than other less commonly occurring patterns of RA-ILD, like non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). Biomarkers from serum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid could aid in the identification of patients at risk for RA-ILD, the detection of patients most likely to develop the UIP pattern of RA-ILD, and the prediction of disease behaviour over time. Notably, the use of highly sensitive serologic biomarkers, including rheumatoid factor (RF) and antibodies targeting cyclic citrullinated peptides, while somewhat specific for RA joint disease, have only limited utility as biomarkers for RA-ILD. Candidate biomarkers for RA-ILD include these and other autoantibodies as well as certain genes and molecules that hold promise as biomarkers in other forms of ILD. In this manuscript, we summarize the state of knowledge on biomarkers for the development and progression of RA-ILD.

RATIONALE: INSPIRATION PLUS (NCT02552849) was a prospective, observational registry of Canadian patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treated with the oral antifibrotic agent pirfenidon...

In 2015, a multidisciplinary task force comprising pulmonologists, rheumatologists, pathologists, and radiologists representing the European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society published a diagnostic classification schema for individuals with interstitial lung disease and autoimmune features who did not meet criteria for a defined connective tissue disease. The term interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) was applied. Classification criteria are often nonspecific, but up to 90% of subjects with IPAF have serological evidence for autoimmunity (particularly (+) antinuclear antibodies). Distinguishing patients with IPAF from idiopathic pulmonary disorders may be difficult. The natural history and appropriate management of IPAF have not been clarified, as data are largely limited to retrospective studies. In this review, we discuss the salient clinical, serologic, histologic, and radiographic features of IPAF and discuss an approach to management.

Background Patients with connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) often experience impaired health status. In daily clinical practice, a short and easy instrument for assessing health status would be useful to help better understand the patient's condition. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a simple questionnaire about respiratory symptoms and their impact. We aimed to examine the CAT's performance characteristics and to generate data to support its reliability and validity in patients with CTD-ILD. Methods We used data from 132 CTD-ILD patients evaluated at Tosei General Hospital from July 2011 to July 2016 to assess the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the CAT. Results The mean age of the patients was 64.5 years and 87 (66%) were women. There were no significant differences in CAT score between any of the CTD subgroups. Internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.881) and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.803) for the CAT score were acceptable. At baseline, CAT score was significantly associated with clinically meaningful measures of physiologic function, exercise capacity, and dyspnea. Change in CAT score over 6–12 months was also associated with change in other measures. In the distribution- and anchor-based analyses, the estimated minimal clinically important difference of CAT score was 1–4 points. Conclusion These data support the validity and reliability of CAT as a sensitive measure for assessing health status in patients with CTD-ILD.

Objective: This paper aims to determine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of a tool that assesses the quality of life in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (cATAQ-IPF) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: We used the process of scale introduction to establish cATAQ-IPF. The content validity of the scale was evaluated by six experts. A total of 92 patients with ILD completed the cATAQ-IPF, St. George's respiratory questionnaire (SGRQ), and The Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale at the baseline, and 15 patients completed cATAQ-IPF at the follow-up period 2 weeks later. Thus, yielding data were used to assess various psychometric properties of cATAQ-IPF. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Cronbach's α coefficient, content validity index (CVI), item-level CVI (I-CVI), Pearson's coefficients, criterion-relation validity, and known-group validity were used for data analysis. Results: The cATAQ-IPF showed excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.95), except for the therapy domain (Cronbach's α = 0.60) and acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96 for the total). The scale-level CVI was 0.80, and the I-CVI was in the range of 0.78–1.00. The total cATAQ-IPF score was strongly correlated with the SGRQ total score (r = 0.71, P

The optimal method of physical activity measurement has not been determined in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD).To assess the validity, internal consistency, and responsiveness of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire long form (IPAQ-LF) and to estimate the minimal important difference (MID) for moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in patients with fibrotic ILD.This two-center prospective cohort study included a convenience sample of 111 outpatients with fibrotic ILD who wore waist and wrist ActiGraph accelerometers for 7 consecutive days, followed by self-administration of the IPAQ-LF. Both measurements were performed at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Spearman rank correlations were used to evaluate the IPAQ-LF validity in comparison to activity monitor data, lung function, step count, and quality of life. The internal consistency of the IPAQ-LF was determined using Cronbach's α. Self-reported changes in IPAQ-LF parameters were compared among tertiles of change measured by the waist activity monitor to assess the responsiveness of the IPAQ-LF after 6 months. Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to estimate the MID for MVPA.Self-reported MVPA minutes, activity-related energy expenditure, sedentary time, and inactive time of the IPAQ-LF generally showed moderate to strong correlations with corresponding waist activity monitor data, step count, lung function, and quality of life. The Cronbach's α of the IPAQ-LF was 0.78. The IPAQ-LF was responsive at detecting increases in weekly MVPA and energy expenditure. The MIDs for MVPA were 8 to 26 and 13 to 58 min/wk using the anchor-based method for waist activity monitor and IPAQ-LF data, respectively. The distribution-based MID estimate for MVPA was 104 to 242 min/wk.The IPAQ-LF has acceptable validity and internal consistency for measuring daily physical activity in patients with fibrotic ILD. The IPAQ-LF was responsive at detecting increases in physical activity but limited in its ability to detect declines or changes in inactivity. Using an anchor-based approach, the MID for MVPA measured by a waist activity monitor is approximately 26 min/wk.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other forms of fibrosing interstitial lung disease (F-ILD) are life-altering conditions that increasingly deprive patients and their caregivers of their quality of...

Purpose: Nintedanib is an approved treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which slows disease progression. Management of patients with IPF receiving nintedanib can be complicated by tolerability issues, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. We developed consensus recommendations on the management of dosing, adverse events and comorbidities in patients with IPF treated with nintedanib. Methods: A modified Delphi process using 3 questionnaires was used to survey 14 pulmonologists experienced in using nintedanib. Panelists rated their agreement with statements on a Likert scale from −5 (strongly disagree) to +5 (strongly agree). Consensus was predefined as a mean score of ⩽−2.5 or ⩾+2.5 with a standard deviation not crossing zero. Results: The panelists’ recommendations were largely aligned with clinical trial data, real-world evidence, and the prescribing information, and provided additional guidance regarding minimizing gastrointestinal effects, periodic monitoring for liver dysfunction, caution with respect to concomitant administration of cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein 1 inhibitors and inducers and anticoagulants, and management of comorbidities. The panelists unanimously agreed that adverse event management should be individualized, based on careful consideration of the risks and benefits of each possible intervention and discussion with the patient. Conclusions: These consensus recommendations provide additional guidance on the appropriate management of IPF with nintedanib, for use alongside evidence-based literature and the prescribing information.

In many studies, more than one-half of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) endorse cough. In IPF (as in other conditions), when chronic, cough may be frustrating and lead to significant impairments in quality of life. In patients with IPF, comorbid conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux can cause or contribute to cough; when stemming from IPF itself, chronic cough likely arises from multiple mechanisms including mechanical and neurosensory changes. In this article, we review our approach at attempting to identify causes of chronic cough in patients with IPF; these include gastroesophageal reflux disease or upper airway cough syndrome and IPF itself. We cursorily summarize the current evidence for the treatment of chronic cough in IPF, briefly review data on the treatment of unexplained chronic cough and extrapolate it to the treatment of refractory cough in IPF, but we focus our attention on our approaches to evaluation and management, recognizing that some may not be supported by a robust cache of data.

This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab, an interleukin (IL)-13 monoclonal antibody, alone or with background pirfenidone therapy, in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Patients with IPF aged ≥40 years with forced vital capacity (FVC) of 40%–100% predicted and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide of 25%–90% predicted and who were treatment-naïve (cohort A) or receiving pirfenidone (2403 mg·day−1; cohort B) were randomised 1:1 to receive lebrikizumab 250 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was annualised rate of FVC % predicted decline over 52 weeks. In cohort A, 154 patients were randomised to receive lebrikizumab (n=78) or placebo (n=76). In cohort B, 351 patients receiving pirfenidone were randomised to receive lebrikizumab (n=174) or placebo (n=177). Baseline demographics were balanced across treatment arms in both cohorts. The primary endpoint (annualised rate of FVC % predicted decline) was not met in cohort A (lebrikizumab versus placebo, −5.2% versus −6.2%; p=0.456) or cohort B (lebrikizumab versus placebo, −5.5% versus −6.0%; p=0.557). In cohort B, a non-statistically significant imbalance in mortality favouring combination therapy was observed (hazard ratio 0.42 (95% CI 0.17–1.04)). Pharmacodynamic biomarkers indicated lebrikizumab activity. The safety profile was consistent with that in previous studies of lebrikizumab and pirfenidone as monotherapies. Lebrikizumab alone or with pirfenidone was not associated with reduced FVC % predicted decline over 52 weeks despite evidence of pharmacodynamic activity. Lebrikizumab was well tolerated with a favourable safety profile. These findings suggest that blocking IL-13 may not be sufficient to achieve a lung function benefit in patients with IPF., This phase 2 RCT found no benefit in FVC decline over 52 weeks in IPF patients for lebrikizumab versus placebo as monotherapy (n=78 versus 76) or in combination with pirfenidone (n=174 versus 177); pirfenidone therapy was consistent with previous results https://bit.ly/313NVR8

Chronic lung diseases can cause great suffering and impair quality of life (QOL) in patients forced to live with them. In this chapter, we discuss the need to identify and alleviate symptoms (dyspnea, cough, fatigue, impaired sleep, anxiety and depression) and other factors that drive QOL impairment. Practitioners can partner with patients to implement strategies that aim to improve this impairment, including the following: addressing misinformation, enrolling patients in a formal pulmonary rehabilitation program, discussing and potentially initiating long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) if appropriate, addressing sleep quality, and encouraging patients and caregivers to take advantage of social support groups. Practitioners who can foster a partnership with their patients (and patients’ caregivers) – those who demonstrate compassion and resourcefulness to face new obstacles together – will be most effective in helping improve or maintain their patients’ QOL.

BackgroundThe Living with Pulmonary Fibrosis (L-PF) questionnaire assesses symptoms and quality of life in patients with fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Its Dyspnoea and Cough domains, whose items’ responses are based on a 24-hour recall, have scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. We evaluated the ability of these domain scores to detect change and estimated their meaningful change thresholds in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs.MethodsThe INBUILD trial enrolled subjects with progressive fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The L-PF questionnaire was completed at baseline and week 52. The responsiveness of the Dyspnoea and Cough scores was evaluated by comparing changes in these scores with 52-week changes in three anchors: forced vital capacity % predicted and two self-reported items, one for global physical health and one for global quality of life. We used a triangulation approach including anchor-based and distribution-based methods to estimate meaningful change thresholds.ResultsThe analyses included 542 subjects with an L-PF Dyspnoea score at baseline and week 52, and 538 subjects with an L-PF Cough score at baseline and week 52. The L-PF Dyspnoea and Cough scores were responsive to change over 52 weeks. Triangulation of anchor-based and distribution-based estimates resulted in meaningful change thresholds of 6 to 7 points for the L-PF Dyspnoea score and 4 to 5 points for the L-PF Cough score to differentiate subjects who were stable or improved from those who deteriorated.ConclusionThese analyses support the responsiveness, one aspect of validity, of the L-PF Dyspnoea and Cough domains scores as measures of symptom severity in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs. Estimates for meaningful change thresholds in these domain scores may be of value in interpreting the effects of interventions in these patients.Trial registration numberNCT02999178.

Purpose of review To present an overview of the impact of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) on patients' emotional well being and quality of life (QoL). Recent findings IPF is an interstitial lung disease which causes irreversible, progressive lung scarring in a pathological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia. The incidence of IPF is increasing at a global level, subjecting an increasing number of people to its high morbidity and risk of mortality. Diagnosis is based on a multidisciplinary team approach and the exclusion of other interstitial lung diseases. Two novel antifibrotic treatments, pirfenidone and nintedanib, were recently approved by regulatory agencies around the globe, thus providing many IPF patients with treatment options for the first time. Several other drugs have entered the investigational pipeline, including many in early-phase or late-phase clinical trials. Given the incurable and progressive nature of IPF, even with antifibrotic therapy, depression and anxiety are common among patients; these and burdensome symptoms of breathlessness, cough and fatigue are factors that impact patients' emotional well being and QoL. In addition to even more effective drugs, there is a need for psychosocial interventions and mental health support strategies focused on improving patients' QoL so they are better equipped to live with this devastating condition. Summary The current article highlights the effects of IPF on patients' emotional well being and QoL and offers suggestions for strategies to help patients with IPF live as well as possible in their daily lives.

Background Air pollution contributes to an estimated six million deaths per year. Epidemiological and experimental studies show an association between air pollutant exposure and respiratory allergy. Objective We aimed to write a narrative review of the epidemiology of air pollution-related respiratory-related allergic disorders (including asthma and allergic rhinitis) and the effects of air pollutants - with an emphasis on the particulate matter - on respiratory allergy-related health. Methods PubMed Medline was searched, and representative epidemiologic and controlled-exposure studies were selected by using terms for air pollutants, particulate matter, and respiratory allergy including asthma and allergic rhinitis. Results Epidemiological studies showed methodologic heterogeneity, including variability in study populations, geographical regions, types and sources of pollutants, methods for exposure estimation, approaches to controlling for confounding, and case definitions. This heterogeneity affected measures of association between studies. There is strong evidence to support an association between exposure to particulate matter and asthmatic exacerbations. Although data are inconclusive, several studies suggest exposure to particulate matter contributes to the development of asthma, allergic sensitization, and allergic rhinitis. Experimental studies, such as controlled-exposure studies, support a causal association between particulate matter and adverse health effects. Conclusions Particulate matter exposure can exacerbate pre-existing asthma and may contribute to developing asthma, allergic rhinitis, and aeroallergen sensitization. Short-term and long-term strategies are needed to reduce disease severity and prevent new-onset disease development. Additional research is needed to identify effective avoidance strategies and therapeutic approaches.

Objective.Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is commonly associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and can have significant morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to calculate the prevalence, incidence, healthcare costs, and mortality of RA-related ILD (RA-ILD) in the United States.Methods.This retrospective cohort analysis used the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental health insurance databases from 2003 to 2014 and the Social Security Administration death database. Patients with RA-ILD were selected based on diagnoses on medical claims. Outcomes were 1-year prevalence and incidence of RA-ILD among the general enrollee population, all-cause and respiratory-related healthcare costs (2014 US$), and all-cause survival for a subset of newly diagnosed patients with vital status information. This analysis was descriptive. No statistical testing was conducted.Results.Prevalence of RA-ILD ranged from 3.2 to 6.0 cases per 100,000 people across the 10-year period and incidence ranged from 2.7 to 3.8 cases per 100,000 people. There were 750 incident patients with 5 years of followup data. Over that time, 72% had an inpatient admission and 76% had an emergency room visit. Mean total 5-year costs were US$173,405 per patient (SD $158,837). Annual per-patient costs were highest in years 1 and 5. At 5 years after first diagnosis in the data, 35.9% of patients had died.Conclusion.Prevalence of RA-ILD increased over time. For patients who could be followed over a 5-year period, healthcare use and costs were somewhat stable over time, but were substantial. RA-ILD is associated with decreased survival.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. Because it shares genetic, histopathologic, and radiographic features with the fibrosing interstitial lung disease seen in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the goal of this study was to investigate RA-related autoantibodies in IPF. METHODS: The study included patients with IPF from two separate cohorts at National Jewish Health and Brigham Women’s Hospital (n = 181), general population control subjects (n = 160), and control subjects with disease (n = 86 [40 with RA-usual interstitial pneumonia and 46 with hypersensitivity pneumonitis]). Serum was tested for RA-associated antibodies (including IgG and IgA) to citrullinated protein antigens (ACPA). Lung tissue in 11 patients with IPF was examined for ectopic lymphoid aggregates. RESULTS: An increased prevalence of ACPA positivity was found in two separate IPF cohorts. In particular, positivity for IgA-ACPA was increased in these two IPF cohorts compared with general population control subjects (21.3% and 24.8% vs 5.6%; P < .01). Patients with IPF were more likely to be IgA-ACPA-positive than IgG-ACPA-positive (23.2% vs 8.3%; P < .01), whereas patients with RA were more likely to be IgG-ACPA-positive than IgA-ACPA-positive (72.5% vs 52.5%; P = .04). There was a strong correlation between IgA-ACPA level and the number of ectopic lymphoid aggregates on lung histologic examination in IPF (r = 0.72; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, IgA-ACPA was elevated in patients with IPF and correlated with lymphoid aggregates in the lung, supporting the theory that IgA-ACPA may play a role in lung disease pathogenesis in a subset of individuals with IPF. Future studies are needed to determine whether this subset of ACPA-positive patients with IPF is distinct from patients with IPF but without antibodies.