Search

Supplementary Tables S1-S4 and Figures S1-S3. Tables S1/S2: % tumor response in mice with HCT116 and A2058 tumor xenografts following treatment; Table S3: Diagram showing dose-decision guidelines utilized in the MK-2206 clinical study based on observed toxicities; Table S4: number of patients with drug-related AEs in all courses of treatment; Figure S1/S2: Line graph showing the relative tumor volume and body weight observed in patients over time expressed in terms of days following treatment; Figure S3: Patient presenting with Grade III rash

Purpose: KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in human tumors. KRAS-mutant cells may exhibit resistance to the allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) and allosteric AKT inhibitors (such as MK-2206), the combination of which may overcome resistance to both monotherapies.Experimental Design: We conducted a dose/schedule-finding study evaluating MK-2206 and selumetinib in patients with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors. Recommended dosing schedules were defined as MK-2206 at 135 mg weekly and selumetinib at 100 mg once daily.Results: Grade 3 rash was the most common dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); other DLTs included grade 4 lipase increase, grade 3 stomatitis, diarrhea, and fatigue, and grade 3 and grade 2 retinal pigment epithelium detachment. There were no meaningful pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. Clinical antitumor activity included RECIST 1.0–confirmed partial responses in non–small cell lung cancer and low-grade ovarian carcinoma.Conclusion: Responses in KRAS-mutant cancers were generally durable. Clinical cotargeting of MEK and AKT signaling may be an important therapeutic strategy in KRAS-driven human malignancies (Trial NCT number NCT01021748). Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 739–48. ©2014 AACR.

Actinomycin-D and vincristine are cytotoxic drugs commonly used to treat cancers in children. This prospective study assessed pharmacokinetic variability and toxicity of these drugs in children. Blood samples were collected in 158 patients. Actinomycin-D or vincristine concentrations were quantified using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using non-compartmental methods. Target toxicities were collected prospectively. Actinomycin-D pharmacokinetics (n=52 patients) were highly variable. The median (coefficient of variation, CV%) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was 332 ng/ml•hr (110%); Clearance was 4.6 L/hr/m(2) (90%); half-life was 25 hours (60%). No patient met the defined criteria for myelosuppression. In multivariate analysis, none of the demographic nor pharmacokinetic parameters were predictors of acute hepatotoxicity. Vincristine pharmacokinetics (n=132 patients) demonstrated substantial variability. The median (CV%) AUC was 78ng/ml•hr (98%); clearance was 17.2L/hr/m(2) (67%); half-life was 14.6 hours (73%). In multivariate analysis, the effect of increasing age for a given BSA was an increase in neuropathy while the effect of increasing BSA for a given age was a decrease in neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetics of both drugs were highly variable. For actinomycin-D, there was no correlation between demographic or pharmacokinetic parameters and target toxicities. For vincristine, the correlations of age and BSA and neuropathy are confounded by the correlation between age and BSA in children and the ability to ascertain neuropathy in infants. Variability may be attributed to dose reductions and capped doses for both drugs. Investigation of BSA-based dosing in young children is warranted to decrease variability of exposure.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the safety and tolerability of therapeutic immunization against the human papillomavirus (HPV) viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 in patients with cervical cancer after chemoradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: MEDI0457 (INO-3112) is a DNA-based vaccine targeting E6 and E7 of HPV-16/18 that is coinjected with an IL-12 plasmid followed by electroporation with the CELLECTRA 5P device. At 2 to 4 weeks after chemoradiation, patients with newly diagnosed stage IB1-IVA (cohort 1) or persistent/recurrent (cohort 2) cervical cancers were treated with 4 immunizations of MEDI0457 every 4 weeks. The primary endpoints were incidence of adverse events and injection site reactions. Immune responses against HPV antigens were measured by ELISpot for interferon-γ (IFNγ), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody responses and multiplexed immunofluorescence for immune cells in cervical biopsy specimens. RESULTS: Ten patients (cohort 1, n = 7; cohort 2, n = 3) with HPV16 (n = 7) or HPV18 (n = 3) cervical cancers received MEDI0457 after chemoradiation. Treatment-related adverse events were all grade 1, primarily related to the injection site. Eight of 10 patients had detectable cellular or humoral immune responses against HPV antigens after chemoradiation and vaccination: 6 of 10 patients generated anti-HPV antibody responses and 6 of 10 patients generated IFNγ-producing T cell responses. At the completion of chemoradiation and vaccination, cervical biopsy specimens had detectable CD8(+) T cells and decreased PD-1(+)CD8(+), PD-L1(+)CD8(+), and PD-L1(+)CD68(+) subpopulations. All patients cleared detectable HPV DNA in cervical biopsies by completion of chemoradiation and vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant MEDI0457 is safe and well tolerated after chemoradiation for locally advanced or recurrent cervical cancers, supporting further investigation into combining tumor-specific vaccines with radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND Novel T cell-enabling therapies, in combination with checkpoint inhibition, may improve OS in GBM. INO-5401 (synthetic DNA plasmids encoding hTERT, WT-1, PSMA) plus INO-9012 (synthetic DNA plasmid encoding IL-12), and the PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab, is given to patients with newly diagnosed GBM to evaluate tolerability, efficacy and immunogenicity. METHODS Phase I/II, single arm, 2 cohort study (A: MGMT unmethylated, B: MGMT methylated). Primary endpoint is safety; efficacy and immunogenicity are secondary. Nine mg INO-5401 plus 1 mg INO-9012 (every 3 weeks x 4 doses, then Q9W) is given IM with EP by CELLECTRA® 2000 with cemiplimab (350 mg IV Q3W). RT is given as 40 Gy over 3 weeks. TMZ is given with radiation (all patients), and adjuvantly (Cohort B only). RESULTS Fifty-two subjects enrolled: 32 in Cohort A; 20 in Cohort B. 35% women; median age 60 years (19–78 years). The adverse event profile is consistent with single-agent (INO-5401, INO-9012, EP and cemiplimab) reported events. OS at 12 months was 84.4% (Cohort A) and 85% (Cohort B). OS at 18 months in Cohort A is 50% (95% CI 31.9 - 68.1); median OS is 17.9 months (14.5 - NR); Cohort B OS18 and median OS will be presented. Tumor gene transcripts at diagnosis confirmed expression of INO-5401 antigens. Peripheral immune responses following INO-5401 revealed antigen-specific T cell responses by Interferon gamma ELISpot and flow cytometry, including cytokine production and expansion of antigen specific CD8+T cells with lytic potential. CONCLUSIONS INO-5401 + INO-9012, a novel DNA plasmid immunotherapy, demonstrates acceptable risk/benefit and generates robust systemic immune responses to encoded tumor antigens when administered with cemiplimab and RT/TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM patients. Overall survival is encouraging. Clinical trial information: NCT03491683.

Background GBM is one of the most deadly cancers and treatment is surgery, followed by radiation (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) daily during RT followed by cycles of TMZ for select patients.1 New immunotherapies, such as checkpoint inhibition, may benefit patients with GBM. T cell-enabling therapies, in combination with checkpoint inhibition, may improve overall survival (OS). In this study, a novel antigen-specific T cell-generating therapy, INO-5401 (synthetic DNA plasmids encoding for human telomerase [hTERT], Wilms Tumor-1 [WT-1] and prostate specific membrane antigen [PSMA]), plus INO-9012 (synthetic DNA plasmid encoding for IL-12), with the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor, cemiplimab, was given to patients with newly-diagnosed GBM to evaluate tolerability, immunogenicity and clinical efficacy of the combination. Methods Phase I/II, single arm, two cohort study (A: MGMT Promoter Unmethylated, B: MGMT Promoter Methylated). The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of INO-5401 and INO-9012 followed by EP with CELLECTRA® 2000 in combination with cemiplimab. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of preliminary clinical efficacy and immunogenicity. Treatment is with 9 mg INO-5401 with 1 mg INO-9012 every three weeks (Q3W) for four doses, then Q9W; and cemiplimab (350 mg IV Q3W). RT is given as 40 Gy over three weeks; TMZ is given concurrent with radiation (Cohorts A and B), followed by maintenance TMZ (Cohort B). Results 52 patients were enrolled onto this study; 32 in Cohort A and 20 in Cohort B. 18 were women (35%) and 47 were white (90%). The median age was 60 years (range 19-78 years). The most common Grade ≥3 adverse events were elevations in alanine or aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST; 5 patients), and tumor inflammation/edema (5 patients); there was one Grade 5 unrelated event of urosepsis. The only related SAE reported in more than one patient was pyrexia. 22 patients (42%) reported immune-related AEs, with the most common being elevations in ALT or AST (8 patients), and were reported most commonly within the first nine weeks of treatment. The safety profile was consistent with that of patients with GBM and of checkpoint inhibitors. ELISpot assessments performed to date demonstrated the majority of patients have T cell responses to INO-5401. PFS6 was 75% (95% CI 56.6, 88.5) in Cohort A (preliminary; Cohort B pending). Conclusions INO-5401 + INO-9012 with cemiplimab has an acceptable safety profile, is immunogenic and is potentially efficacious in patients with newly-diagnosed GBM. This combination is promising; survival results will be updated next year. Trial Registration NCT03491683. Ethics Approval This study was approved by New York University institution’s Ethics Board; approval number i17-00764. References Stupp R, et al. (2009). Lancet Oncology 10(5): 459–466.

The management of men with prostate cancer (PCa) with biochemical recurrence following local definitive therapy remains controversial. Early use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) leads to significant side effects. Developing an alternative, clinically effective, and well-tolerated therapy remains an unmet clinical need. INO-5150 is a synthetic DNA therapy that includes plasmids encoding for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and INO-9012 is a synthetic DNA plasmid encoding for interleukin-12 (IL-12). This phase 1/2, open-label, multi-center study enrolled men with PCa with rising PSA after surgery and/or radiation therapy. Patients were enrolled into one of four treatment arms: arm A, 2 mg of INO-5150; arm B, 8.5 mg of INO-5150; arm C, 2 mg of INO-5150 + 1 mg of INO-9012; and arm D, 8.5 mg of INO-5150 + 1 mg of INO-9012. Patients received study drug with electroporation on day 0 and on weeks 3, 12, and 24, and they were followed for up to 72 weeks. Sixty-two patients were enrolled. Treatment was well tolerated. 81% (50/62) of patients completed all visits. 85% (53/62) remained progression-free at 72 weeks. PSA doubling time (PSADT) was increased when assessed in patients with day 0 PSADT ≤12 months. Immunogenicity was observed in 76% (47/62) of patients by multiple assessments. Analysis indicated that CD38 and perforin co-positive CD8 T cell frequency correlated with attenuated PSA rise (p = 0.05, n = 50).

BackgroundHuman telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is frequently classified as a ‘universal’ tumor associated antigen due to its expression in a vast number of cancers. We evaluated plasmid DNA-encoded hTERT as an immunotherapy across nine cancer types.MethodsA phase 1 clinical trial was conducted in adult patients with no evidence of disease following definitive surgery and standard therapy, who were at high risk of relapse. Plasmid DNA encoding one of two hTERT variants (INO-1400 or INO-1401) with or without plasmid DNA encoding interleukin 12 (IL-12) (INO-9012) was delivered intramuscularly concurrent with the application of the CELLECTRA constant-current electroporation device 4 times across 12 weeks. Safety assessments and immune monitoring against native (germline, non-mutated, non-plasmid matched) hTERT antigen were performed. The largest cohort of patients enrolled had pancreatic cancer, allowing for additional targeted assessments for this tumor type.ResultsOf the 93 enrolled patients who received at least one dose, 88 had at least one adverse event; the majority were grade 1 or 2, related to injection site. At 18 months, 54.8% (51/93) patients were disease-free, with median disease-free survival (DFS) not reached by end of study. For patients with pancreatic cancer, the median DFS was 9 months, with 41.4% of these patients remaining disease-free at 18 months. hTERT immunotherapy induced a de novo cellular immune response or enhanced pre-existing cellular responses to native hTERT in 96% (88/92) of patients with various cancer types. Treatment with INO-1400/INO-1401±INO-9012 drove hTERT-specific IFN-γ production, generated hTERT-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing the activation marker CD38, and induced hTERT-specific activated CD8 +CTLs as defined by cells expressing perforin and granzymes. The addition of plasmid IL-12 adjuvant elicited higher magnitudes of cellular responses including IFN-γ production, activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and activated CD8+CTLs. In a subset analysis of pancreatic cancer patients, the presence of immunotherapy-induced activated CD8+ T cells expressing PD-1, granzymes and perforin correlated with survival.ConclusionsPlasmid DNA-encoded hTERT/IL-12 DNA immunotherapy was well-tolerated, immune responses were noted across all tumor types, and a specific CD8+ phenotype increased by the immunotherapy was significantly correlated with survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.

An urgent need remains for new paediatric oncology drugs to cure children who die from cancer and to reduce drug-related sequelae in survivors. In 2007, the European Paediatric Regulation came into law requiring industry to create paediatric drug (all types of medicinal products) development programmes alongside those for adults. Unfortunately, paediatric drug development is still largely centred on adult conditions and not a mechanism of action (MoA)-based model, even though this would be more logical for childhood tumours as these have much fewer non-synonymous coding mutations than adult malignancies. Recent large-scale sequencing by International Genome Consortium and Paediatric Cancer Genome Project has further shown that the genetic and epigenetic repertoire of driver mutations in specific childhood malignancies differs from more common adult-type malignancies. To bring about much needed change, a Paediatric Platform, ACCELERATE, was proposed in 2013 by the Cancer Drug Development Forum, Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer, the European Network for Cancer Research in Children and Adolescents and the European Society for Paediatric Oncology. The Platform, comprising multiple stakeholders in paediatric oncology, has three working groups, one with responsibility for promoting and developing high-quality MoA-informed paediatric drug development programmes, including specific measures for adolescents. Key is the establishment of a freely accessible aggregated database of paediatric biological tumour drug targets to be aligned with an aggregated pipeline of drugs. This will enable prioritisation and conduct of early phase clinical paediatric trials to evaluate these drugs against promising therapeutic targets and to generate clinical paediatric efficacy and safety data in an accelerated time frame. Through this work, the Platform seeks to ensure that potentially effective drugs, where the MoA is known and thought to be relevant to paediatric malignancies, are evaluated in early phase clinical trials, and that this approach to generate pre-clinical and clinical data is systematically pursued by academia, sponsors, industry, and regulatory bodies to bring new paediatric oncology drugs to front-line therapy more rapidly. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Introduction: Human papilloma virus (HPV)-6 and 11-associated aerodigestive neoplasms can occur in the oropharynx, larynx, and upper respiratory tract. HPV is implicated in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP), the most common benign tumor of the laryngeal epithelium. RRP is rare, with an incidence rate of 1.8 per 100,000 adults in the United States, but the clinical course can be significant and patients with RRP have a higher risk of developing laryngeal cancer. DNA therapies focusing on treating HPV-related disease may be of benefit in RRP. Methods: A pilot clinical study was conducted in subjects with HPV-6-associated RRP or invasive carcinoma (NCT02241369). Subjects with HPV-6-associated aerodigestive disease received four doses (one dose every three weeks) of INO-3106, a synthetic DNA plasmid encoding HPV-6 E6 and E7 proteins, with and without INO-9012, a synthetic DNA plasmid encoding IL-12. INO-3106 and INO-9012 were administered intramuscularly (IM), followed by electroporation with the CELLECTRA® 2000 device. Subjects were assessed for safety and tolerability, antigen-specific T cell responses, and efficacy, as assessed by disease-free interval. Flow cytometry and immune gene transcript assessments focused on CD8+ T cells. Results: Three subjects were enrolled; one with invasive carcinoma and two with RRP. All subjects received all four doses of INO-3106; two doses with, and two without, INO-9012. The most common adverse event was injection site discomfort in all patients; no other related AEs were reported on this study. One patient with laryngeal cancer reported an SAE of stroke, unrelated to study therapy. An assessment of cellular immune responses from the two RRP subjects by flow cytometry after completion of study therapy demonstrated the induction of HPV-6-specific CD8+ T cells co-expressing various activation markers and lytic proteins consistent with a Cytolytic T Cell (CTL) phenotype. Among the T cell populations induced by study treatment, CTLs co-expressing CD137, CD38, Ki67, Granzyme A, Granzyme B and Perforin were increased following study treatment. Both RRP subjects had required frequent (every six month) surgery prior to enrolling on-study; following study therapy, one patient remained disease-free for over 500 days, and the other remains disease-free over 900 days. Conclusions: INO-3106, with INO-9012, given IM followed by EP with CELLECTRA® is tolerable, immunogenic, and may provide clinical benefit. A larger study is currently planned to explore the efficacy of this therapy in adults, adolescents and children with RRP. Citation Format: Charu Aggarwal, Roger B. Cohen, Matthew P. Morrow, Kimberly A. Kraynyak, Jocelyn Cheung, Kelsie Dickerson, Veronique Schulten, Dawson Knoblock, Elisabeth Gillespie, Joshua M. Bauml, Malissa Diehl, Jean Boyer, Michael Dallas, David B. Weiner, Jeffrey M. Skolnik. A synthetic DNA plasmid encoding HPV6 E6 and E7 proteins in patients with HPV6-associated aerodigestive lesions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT126.

Introduction: About one-third of prostate cancer (PCa) patients will experience rising prostate specific antigen levels, a condition known as biochemical recurrence. INO-5150 is a DNA-based immunotherapy targeting PSA and PSMA previously tested with or without plasmid-encoded cytokine adjuvant IL-12 (INO-9012) in a phase 1/2, open-label, multi-center study. Treatment was well-tolerated and safe, with no treatment-related serious adverse events. Here we sought to characterize the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of treated patients before and after INO-5150. Experimental Procedures: 62 post-prostatectomy/radiation therapy patients with rising PSA were enrolled in the trial. INO-5150±INO-9012 was administered IM followed by electroporation with the CELLECTRA® device on day 0, weeks 3, 12 and 24. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected before and after treatment from a subset of patients (n=19) and stimulated with PSA or PSMA peptides, negative or positive controls. After 5 days the Complementary Determining Region 3 (CDR3) of the TCR beta chain was sequenced. Results: TCR sequences that expanded after PSA or PSMA stimulation only were considered antigen specific sequences. On average, >70% of antigen specific TCR sequences were expanded following treatment with INO-5150 +/- INO-9012, including fold increases of up to 327 fold for PSA and 471 fold for PSMA over pretreatment frequencies. All treated patients had a Shannon's entropy (H) index >3.5 for TCR diversity. Previous examination of these patients using flow cytometry suggested that half of them demonstrated expansion of a PSA/PSMA specific CD8+ T cell subset harboring lytic potential (CD38+PD1+Prf+). TCR analysis performed by grouping patients based on the presence or absence of these cells suggested PSA/PSMA specific TCR expansion occurred for both groups. Deeper analysis suggested differences in the degree of expansion, as 56% of patients with the CD38+PD1+Prf+ phenotype were found to have at least 150 TCRs with a 10 fold expansion over baseline, whereas only 20% of patients without this cell population met this criteria. Conclusions: Treatment with INO-5150 +/- INO-9012 in PCa patients drove the expansion of a diverse pool of antigen specific T cells with a high Shannon's Entropy value suggesting high TCR diversity. Patients with immune reactivity by flow cytometry were more likely to have a higher frequency of PSA/PSMA specific TCRs that expanded >10 fold over their pre-treatment value; however patients without immune reactivity also demonstrated expansion in TCRs. These data suggest that INO-5150 induced PSA/PSMA specific T cells and that TCR sequencing is a valuable tool for assessment of immune responses induced by immunotherapy that does not bias towards a specific T cell function. Citation Format: Kimberly A. Kraynyak, Matthew P. Morrow, Albert J. Sylvester, Snehal Wani, Jean Boyer, Kamal Bhatt, Trevor McMullan, Jessica Lee, Brian Sacchetta, Samantha Rosencranz, Jeffrey Skolnik, Neal Shore. Immunotherapy targeting PSA and PSMA in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer expands antigen-specific T cell receptor repertoire in a PhI/II trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-144.

2514 Background: Novel T cell-enabling therapies, in combination with checkpoint inhibition, may improve OS in GBM. INO-5401 (synthetic DNA plasmids encoding for hTERT, WT-1 and PSMA), plus INO-9012 (synthetic DNA plasmid encoding IL-12), with the PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab, is given to patients with newly-diagnosed GBM to evaluate tolerability, efficacy and immunogenicity of the combination. Methods: Phase I/II, single arm, 2 cohort study (A: MGMT unmethylated, B: MGMT methylated). The primary endpoint is safety; efficacy and immunogenicity are secondary. Nine mg INO-5401 plus 1 mg INO-9012 (every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then Q9W) is given with EP by CELLECTRA 2000 with cemiplimab (350 mg IV Q3W). RT is given as 40 Gy over 3 weeks. TMZ is given with radiation (all patients), followed by maintenance (Cohort B only). Results: Fifty two subjects were enrolled: 32 in Cohort A; 20 in Cohort B. 35% women and 90% white. Median age 60 years (range 19-78 years). Common Grade ≥3 AEs reported were: platelet count decreased (11.5%), tumor inflammation (7.7%), seizure (7.7%), ALT increased (7.7%), lymphocyte count decreased (7.7.%). One Grade 5 unrelated event of urosepsis was reported. Of 69 SAEs reported there was only 1 related to the combination therapy, Grade 1 pyrexia. 48% of subjects reported irAEs, most frequently ALT increased (9.6%), AST increased (7.7%), diarrhea (7.7%), pyrexia (7.7%) and tumor inflammation (7.7%). 71% of the reported SAEs and irAEs occurred within the first 12 weeks of treatment. OS at 12 months was 84.4% (95% CI 67.2, 94.7) in Cohort A; Cohort B will be presented at ASCO. ELISpot assessments demonstrated T cell responses to INO-5401. Flow cytometry demonstrated evidence of activated INO-5401-specific CD8+T cells with lytic potential (CD38+Prf+GrzA+) when compared with baseline, post-treatment in the majority of patients assayed. Conclusions: INO-5401 + INO-9012 in combination with cemiplimab and RT/TMZ has an acceptable safety profile, is immunogenic and may show a survival advantage in patients with newly-diagnosed GBM. OS18 data will be presented later this year. Clinical trial information: NCT03491683 .

Background: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disorder characterized by the generation of papillomas of the aerodigestive tract, usually associated with human papilloma virus (HPV) subtypes 6, 11. INO-3106 is a DNA plasmid-based immunotherapy targeting E6 and E7 proteins of HPV6, in order to create a robust immune T cell response. Methods: Testing of INO-3016 in animal models confirmed immunogenicity of the DNA-based therapy. A single-site open-label Phase 1 study was initiated for patients with HPV6-positive RRP. Patients were dosed with INO-3106 with or without INO-9012, a DNA plasmid immunotherapy that encodes IL-12, delivered intramuscularly (IM) in combination with electroporation (EP) with the CELLECTRA&reg, device. Patients received an escalating dose of INO-3106, 3 mg once and then 6 mg for three additional doses, each dose three weeks apart, with the third and fourth doses co-administered with INO-9012. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of INO-3106 with and without INO-9012. The secondary objective was to determine cellular immune responses to INO-3106 with and without INO-9012. Exploratory objectives included preliminary clinical efficacy to the therapy. Results: Three patients were enrolled in this study, of which two had RRP. Study therapy was well-tolerated, with no related serious adverse events and all related adverse events (AEs) were low-grade. Injection site pain was the most common related AE reported. Immunogenicity was evidenced by multiple immune assays showing engagement and expansion of an HPV6-specific cellular response, including cytotoxic T cells. Preliminary efficacy was demonstrated in patients with RRP in the form of reduction in need for surgical intervention for papilloma growth. Prior to intervention, both patients required surgical intervention approximately every 180 days. One patient demonstrated a greater than three-fold increase in surgery avoidance (584 days) and the other patient remains completely surgery-free as of the last contact at 915 days, a greater than 5-fold increase in surgery interval. Conclusion: INO-3106 with and without INO-9012 was well tolerated, immunogenic and demonstrated preliminary efficacy in patients with HPV6-associated RRP aerodigestive lesions. Further clinical study is indicated.

Purpose: KRAS is the most commonly mutated oncogene in human tumors. KRAS-mutant cells may exhibit resistance to the allosteric MEK1/2 inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) and allosteric AKT inhibitors (such as MK-2206), the combination of which may overcome resistance to both monotherapies. Experimental Design: We conducted a dose/schedule-finding study evaluating MK-2206 and selumetinib in patients with advanced treatment-refractory solid tumors. Recommended dosing schedules were defined as MK-2206 at 135 mg weekly and selumetinib at 100 mg once daily. Results: Grade 3 rash was the most common dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); other DLTs included grade 4 lipase increase, grade 3 stomatitis, diarrhea, and fatigue, and grade 3 and grade 2 retinal pigment epithelium detachment. There were no meaningful pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. Clinical antitumor activity included RECIST 1.0–confirmed partial responses in non–small cell lung cancer and low-grade ovarian carcinoma. Conclusion: Responses in KRAS-mutant cancers were generally durable. Clinical cotargeting of MEK and AKT signaling may be an important therapeutic strategy in KRAS-driven human malignancies (Trial NCT number NCT01021748). Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 739–48. ©2014 AACR.

Background AZD4877 is a potent inhibitor of the mitotic spindle kinesin, Eg5. Early-phase clinical studies in a broad range of cancers showed that AZD4877 is well tolerated. This Phase II study evaluated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics (Cmax) of AZD4877 in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00661609). Patients and methods AZD4877 25 mg was administered once-weekly for 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal. The primary objective was to determine the objective response rate (RECIST). Recruitment was to be halted if ≤2 of the first 20 evaluable patients achieved an objective tumor response. Cmax was assessed on days 1 and 8 of cycle 1. Results None of the first 20 patients evaluable for efficacy achieved an objective response; enrollment was therefore halted. During this initial analysis, a further 21 patients were recruited. Overall, 39 patients were evaluable for efficacy, including one with confirmed partial response (PR) and seven patients with stable disease for ≥8 weeks (including one unconfirmed PR). The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (22 patients), fatigue (12), leukopenia (7) and constipation (6); the most commonly reported grade ≥3 TRAE was neutropenia (21). Four patients had serious TRAEs. On days 1 and 8, the geometric mean Cmax of AZD4877 was 138 ng/ml (CV = 75 %) and 144 ng/ml (CV = 109 %), respectively. Conclusions AZD4877 was generally tolerable in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. Given the limited clinical efficacy, further development of AZD4877 in urothelial cancer is not planned.

This systematic literature review describes adverse events (AEs) among patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who received second-line or later anticancer therapies. Searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies of adults with advanced or metastatic STS who received systemic anticancer therapy before enrollment in a randomized-controlled trial of pazopanib, another targeted cancer agent, or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Of 204 publications identified, seven articles representing six unique studies met inclusion criteria. Additional safety results for pazopanib were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Hematologic toxicities were common with all therapies evaluated (pazopanib, trabectedin, dacarbazine ± gemcitabine, gemcitabine ± docetaxel, cyclophosphamide, and ifosfamide). Studies differed in AE type, timing of assessment, and outcomes reported, although patient populations and AE assessment timing were relatively similar for pazopanib and trabectedin. AEs that were more common with trabectedin than pazopanib were anemia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, and elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase. An AE that was more common with pazopanib than trabectedin was anorexia. Only the pazopanib study reported AE frequencies versus placebo. A planned meta-analysis was not feasible, as there was no common comparator. More well-designed studies that include common comparators are needed for comparison of safety effects among treatments for STS.

The binding of drugs to catheters can be a source variation in dosing chemotherapeutics. Drug contamination from the dosing central venous line (CVL) can impact the reporting of pharmacokinetic (PK) results and analysis. Peripheral venipuncture avoids binding complications from the CVL but dissuades patients from enrolling. Our group has developed a catheter clearing procedure to minimize the extent of contamination so that dosing and sampling from the CVL can ensue, promoting patient willingness to participate in phase I pediatric oncology trials.To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of actinomycin-D (AMD) in children with cancer incorporating expressions for drug contamination from PK samples obtained via indwelling CVLs and to evaluate the efficiency of a catheter clearing procedure in removing contamination as well as the impact of contamination on PK results.A dataset of 199 AMD plasma concentration measurements from 36 patients (age 1.6-20.3 years) was analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Quantitative modeling approaches, including baseline contamination model, covariate model, and catheter clearance model, were evaluated to describe catheter contamination. Monte Carlo simulations mimicking a prospective study in children with cancer were performed to assess the performance of the final model and impact of catheter contamination on PK reporting.The PK of AMD was best described by a linear 3-compartment model with first-order elimination. A baseline contamination model including a contamination factor proportional to the model-predicted concentration for samples obtained from central catheters was chosen as the most parsimonious and accurate among competing models. The final model parameters were allometrically scaled to a 70 kg person. The estimated mean parameter values were 11 L/h, 5.79, 24.2, 490 L, 17.7, and 42.8 L/h for total clearance, central volume of distribution, peripheral volume 1, peripheral volume 2, inter-compartmental clearance 1, and inter-compartmental clearance 2, respectively. The proportional contamination factor was 19.3 % immediately post-drug administration and decreased at a first-order rate of 0.0932 h(-1). Simulations precisely re-estimated kinetic parameters with catheter contamination adjustment. Large uncertainty and poor estimation were observed when contamination was ignored.Drug contamination from sampling catheter can impact AMD PK results and should be accounted for in the analysis. We provide a framework for evaluating catheter contamination and guidance on adjustment in the PK model.

Study Objective. To evaluate the extent of agreement between plasma gentamicin concentrations determined from samples collected by using implantable subcutaneous central venous catheters (ports) with the push-pull method and those collected by finger lancet punctures in children with febrile neutropenia. Design. Prospective, randomized study. Setting. University-affiliated, tertiary care hospital. Patients. Sixty-two children with cancer who had single- or double-lumen ports and who received gentamicin for treatment of febrile neutropenia between February 2008 and October 2009. Intervention. One blood sample was collected from the port by using the push-pull method at the same time one blood sample was collected by finger lancet puncture for determination of plasma gentamicin concentrations. Measurements and Main Results. Forty-four pairs of samples were available for assessment of agreement, and 43 were available for pharmacokinetic analysis. Agreement between plasma gentamicin concentrations determined from blood samples from ports and finger lancet punctures was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, and comparison of simulated dosage adjustments. Changes in port patency were monitored for 1 week after port sampling. Differences in simulated dosage adjustments calculated by using either the port or finger lancet puncture samples that differed by greater than 20% were considered clinically significant. Agreement between the 44 finger lancet puncture and port sample pairs was excellent (ICC 0.991, 95% confidence interval 0.984–0.995). Port plasma gentamicin concentrations were 4.7% lower than those concentrations determined in blood from finger lancet punctures. The observed limits of agreement ranged from −20.5% to 11%. Differences in dosage adjustments calculated by using port and finger lancet puncture plasma gentamicin concentrations were not clinically significant in 38 (88%) of 43 cases. No changes in port patency were observed in the week after port sampling. Conclusion. The push-pull method of blood sampling is a reliable and safe option for determining plasma gentamicin concentrations in children with ports.

Inhibition of kinesin spindle protein or Eg5 causes the formation of monoastral mitotic spindles, which leads to cell death. AZD4877 is a specific, potent inhibitor of Eg5. This was a Phase I, open-label, two-part study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety and tolerability of AZD4877 in patients with advanced solid malignancies. In part A, the MTD of AZD4877, administered as three weekly 1-h intravenous (iv) infusions in a 28-day schedule, was determined by evaluating dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). In part B, the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic profile of AZD4877 at the MTD were evaluated. In part A, 29 patients received at least one dose of AZD4877 (5 mg, n = 4; 7.5 mg, n = 4; 10 mg, n = 3; 15 mg, n = 3; 20 mg, n = 3; 30 mg, n = 6; 36 mg, n = 3; 45 mg, n = 3). The MTD was defined as 30 mg, with the primary DLT being neutropenia. Although exposures appeared to be similar at the AZD4877 20 and 30 mg doses, dose reductions and omissions were higher in the 30-mg cohort; therefore, an intermediate dose, 25 mg, was evaluated in part B (n = 14). In part B, neutropenia remained the most commonly reported causally related adverse event. Exposure to AZD4877 was approximately dose proportional. Severity of neutropenia was related to exposure. The MTD of AZD4877 given as a 1-h iv infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle was 30 mg. At the selected 25 mg dose, AZD4877 had an acceptable safety profile.

Background Dactinomycin (AMD) and vincristine (VCR) have been used for the treatment of childhood cancer over the past 40 years but evidence-based dosing guidance is lacking.

Objectives To develop a method for drug dosing and pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling in children with cancer from a single indwelling central venous catheter that minimized drug contamination. Methods A benchtop system was designed to simulate dosing and clearing actinomycin-D (AMD) and vincristine (VCR) from central venous catheters. The authors evaluated the effects of flush volume, composition and pH, timed drug instillation, and number of blood-draw return cycles on residual drug concentrations. A proof-of-principle study was conducted in three pediatric patients with cancer with paired PK samples obtained by both central and peripheral catheters. Results Nearly complete removal of drug from the catheter was obtained after five blood-draw return cycles consisting of 5 mL of whole blood. Residual concentration of AMD was 0.18 ± 0.02 ng/mL or 0.16% of the initial infusion concentration. VCR exhibited lower propensity for catheter adsorption than AMD with residual concentrations undetectable after three blood-draw return cycles. In patients in which the clearance procedure was used, higher drug concentrations were generally observed from centrally cleared samples at most time points, but differences relative to peripherally obtained samples were not statistically significant for either AMD or VCR. Two of three patients had higher exposure for AMD based on PK samples obtained from central catheters, whereas exposure for VCR was similar for both sampling catheters in all patients. Conclusions A reliable procedure to efficiently reduce AMD and VCR contamination during PK sampling has been established and is currently being used in a PK study being conducted by the Children's Oncology Group.

5525Background: DNA immunotherapies targeting HPV oncogenes, E6 and E7, have demonstrated clinical efficacy in pre-invasive cervical lesions. Here, we assessed the feasibility of chemoradiation and...

Previous exploration of oncology study design efficiency has focused on Markov processes alone (probability-based events) without consideration for time dependencies. Barriers to study completion include time delays associated with patient accrual, inevaluability (IE), time to dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and administrative and review time. Discrete event simulation (DES) can incorporate probability-based assignment of DLT and IE frequency, correlated with cohort in the case of DLT, with time-based events defined by stochastic relationships. A SAS-based solution to examine study efficiency metrics and evaluate design modifications that would improve study efficiency is presented. Virtual patients are simulated with attributes defined from prior distributions of relevant patient characteristics. Study population datasets are read into SAS macros which select patients and enroll them into a study based on the specific design criteria if the study is open to enrollment. Waiting times, arrival times and time to study events are also sampled from prior distributions; post-processing of study simulations is provided within the decision macros and compared across designs in a separate post-processing algorithm. This solution is examined via comparison of the standard 3+3 decision rule relative to the ''rolling 6'' design, a newly proposed enrollment strategy for the phase I pediatric oncology setting.

Purpose To shorten the study conduct timeline of pediatric phase I oncology trials by employing a novel trial design. Methods A comparison of the traditional 3 + 3 patients per cohort, phase I trial design with a novel, rolling six design was performed by using discrete event simulation. The rolling six design allows for accrual of two to six patients concurrently onto a dose level based on the number of patients currently enrolled and evaluable, the number experiencing dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and the number still at risk of developing a DLT. Clinical trial simulations (n = 1,000) were based on historical data and were performed using SAS 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Study timelines and patient numbers were determined for each design, and safety was assessed as a function of the number of DLTs observed. Results In twelve completed historical studies, the median time to study completion was 452 days (range, 220 to 606 days); number of evaluable participants enrolled was 22 (range, 11 to 33), and DLTs occurring per study was three (range, 0 to 5). In 1,000 study simulations, in which the average time to new patient accrual was 10 days, the average ± standard deviation (SD) time to study completion was 294 ± 75 days for the rolling six design versus 350 ± 84 days for the 3 + 3 design, whereas the number of DLTs per study was the same (average ± SD, 3.3 ± 1.1 v 3.2 ± 1.1 for the rolling six and 3 + 3 designs, respectively). Conclusion The rolling six design may significantly decrease the duration of pediatric phase I studies without increasing the risk of toxicity. The design will be tested prospectively in upcoming Children's Oncology Group phase I trials.

Actinomycin-D is an antineoplastic agent that inhibits RNA synthesis by binding to guanine residues and inhibiting DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Although actinomycin-D has been used to treat rhabdomyosarcoma and Wilms tumor for more than 40 years, the dose/exposure relationship is not well characterized. The objective of this study was to develop an initial population pharmacokinetic model to describe actinomycin-D disposition in children and young adults from which a prospective study could be designed. A total of 165 actinomycin-D plasma concentration measurements from 33 patients, aged 1.6 to 20.3 years, were used for the analysis. The data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling with the NONMEM software system. Age, weight, and gender were examined as covariates for the ability to explain interindividual variability in actinomycin-D pharmacokinetics. The final model was qualified via predictive check and non-parametric bootstrap procedures. A 3-compartment model with first-order elimination was chosen as the structural model. Allometric expressions incorporating weight were used to describe the effects of body size on actinomycin-D pharmacokinetics. Age and gender had no discernible effects on actinomycin-D pharmacokinetics in the population studied. The predictive check showed that the developed model was able to simulate data in close agreement with the actual study observations. The availability of an initial population pharmacokinetic model to describe actinomycin-D pharmacokinetics will facilitate the development of a large-scale clinical trial to study the actinomycin-D dose/exposure relationship in pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma and Wilms tumor. The covariate analysis described by the current data set suggests that indices of body size captured via allometric expressions improve the partition of variation in actinomycin-D pharmacokinetics from this pilot data set. Relationships between pharmacokinetics and toxicity will be examined in future prospective studies in which children less than 1 year old will be enrolled. Refereed/Peer-reviewed

Purpose To determine the efficacy and safety of pediatric phase I oncology trials in the era of dose-intensive chemotherapy and to analyze how efficiently these trials are conducted. Methods Phase I pediatric oncology trials published from 1990 to 2004 and their corresponding adult phase I trials were reviewed. Dose escalation schemes using fixed 30% dose increments were studied to theoretically determine whether trials could be completed utilizing fewer patients and dose levels. Results Sixty-nine pediatric phase I oncology trials enrolling 1,973 patients were identified. The pediatric maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was strongly correlated with the adult MTD (r = 0.97). For three-fourths of the trials, the pediatric and adult MTD differed by no more than 30%, and for more than 85% of the trials, the pediatric MTD was less than or equal to 1.6 times the adult MTD. The median number of dose levels studied was four (range, two to 13). The overall objective response rate was 9.6%, the likelihood of experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity was 24%, and toxic death rate was 0.5%. Conclusion Despite the strong correlation between the adult and pediatric MTDs, more than four dose levels were studied in 40% of trials. There appeared to be little value in exploring dose levels greater than 1.6 times the adult MTD. Limiting pediatric phase I trials to a maximum of four doses levels would significantly shorten the timeline for study conduct without compromising safety.

7060Background: Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs) are a family of molecules that are dysregulated in myeloid stem cell disorders and prevent programmed cell death. SMAC (second mitochondrial a...

This investigation evaluated the impact of potential drug interactions on the incidence of reported toxicities seen with common dosing patterns in children with cancer, with the intent of being able to screen and reduce the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the future. Toxicity reported in pediatric cancer patients treated at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia from 2004 to 2010 were abstracted from a cancer tumor registry and merged with drug order profiles from the medical record system. Analysis datasets were created in SAS and permutation algorithms were used to identify pairwise drug combinations associated with specific toxicity occurrence. Relative risk of toxicity based on dosing pattern was assessed via comparison to control patients. A total of 326 of 1,713 patients (19%) had reportable toxicities. Neutrophil count decreases and alanine aminotransferase increases represented the highest occurring, corresponding to 28.8% and 31.9% prevalence among patients reporting toxicity, respectively. Of coadministered drug pairs, acetaminophen–diphenhydramine occurred most frequently; however, methotrexate–vincristine was the highest occurring pair linked to a single toxicity (hepatotoxicity). Toxicity was highly associated with the diagnoses of leukemia (52.1%) or neuroblastoma (28.5%). Comparison of the dosing interval (≤30 versus >30 min) suggested that risk of toxicity can be associated with the timing of coadministration, with ≤30 min increasing the risk of hepatotoxicity with fentanyl–midazolam and methotrexate–midazolam combinations. Knowledge of drug interactions in children with cancer may help reduce the incidence of ADRs by providing pharmacotherapy options that may reduce the likelihood of toxicity.

Background This Phase I study assessed the safety and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the kinesin spindle protein inhibitor AZD4877 in patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors and lymphoma. Methods In this multicenter study, a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used. AZD4877 was given as an intravenous infusion on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of each 21-day cycle. Responses were assessed with CT scans +/− PET after 6 and 12 weeks, then every 12 weeks while on therapy. An additional four patients with lymphoma were enrolled at the MTD. Results 29 patients were enrolled and 22 patients received at least one dose of AZD4877 and were evaluable for safety. The MTD was 11 mg. Dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia (n = 2 patients, 15 mg cohort). The most common adverse events were grade 1/2 fatigue, nausea, neutropenia and dyspnea. AZD4877 exposure generally increased with dose, with mean elimination half-life approximately 16 h at the MTD. Pharmacodynamic analyses demonstrated moderate correlation between plasma drug concentrations at 6 or 24 h and monoaster formation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Conclusions AZD4877 is generally well-tolerated with pharmacodynamic evidence of target inhibition in circulating PBMCs.

Little attention has been paid to the study of trial efficiency despite increasing pressures to conduct clinical research in an expedient manner and the ever-present “time is money” mantra that governs the pharmaceutical research concerned with drug development. Still less appreciated is the impact that trial inefficiency can have when studies compete for a finite study population desperate to test potentially lifesaving new medicines. We have used discrete event simulation techniques to examine such sensitivities in pediatric oncology. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2008); 84, 6, 729–733 doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.193

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used to treat adult cancers for over a decade. Since the discovery of imatinib mesylate (STI-571, Gleevec; Novartis), tyrosine kinase inhibitors have ushered in a new age of targeted therapy. Although the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved several kinase inhibitors for use in adult cancers, currently only imatinib mesylate is approved for use in children with cancer. This review highlights the mechanisms of tyrosine kinase inhibition, the potential role of tyrosine kinase pathways in the treatment of pediatric cancers, and the current status of pediatric clinical investigation of a spectrum of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of childhood cancer.

We describe a selective and a highly sensitive assay for actinomycin-D (Act-D) and vincristine (VCR) in plasma employing high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) detection. The intraday precision (as defined by the coefficient of variation, CV) based on the standard deviation of replicates of quality control samples ranged from 4.9 to 7.5% and 6.5 to 11.3% with accuracy ranging from 90.7 to 98.1% and 91.2 to 103% for Act-D and VCR, respectively. The interday precision ranged from 7.2 to 10.0% and 11.3 to 13.0% and the accuracy ranged from 94.3 to 102% and 90.7 to 91.6% for Act-D and VCR, respectively. Stability studies showed that Act-D and VCR were stable both during the assay procedure and long-term storage. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for both Act-D and VCR was 0.05 ng/ml. The analytical method showed excellent sensitivity, precision, and accuracy. This method is robust and is being successfully employed in a pharmacokinetic study of these agents in children with cancer, and is expected to support several ongoing and future pediatric trials.

Actinomycin-D (Act-D) and vincristine (VCR) are cytotoxic agents commonly used in the treatment of pediatric cancers. To date, there are few published methods on quantifying Act-D or VCR and no published methods on quantifying the two drugs together. We present a methodology for the simultaneous quantification of Act-D and VCR in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) detection. Following solid phase extraction, plasma samples were separated and analyzed using electrospray ionization (ESI). The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for both Act-D and VCR was 0.5 ng/ml. The analytical accuracy for detection of both Act-D and VCR wasor = 90%. The analytical precision, as estimated by the coefficient of variation wasor = 6% for Act-D andor = 11% for VCR. Given the prevalence of the use of the two drugs as combination therapy in a variety of pediatric oncological indications, the small sample volume requirements and the assay sensitivity, this methodology is expected to support several ongoing and future pediatric trials.

Tumour suppressor genes are a group of genes whose loss contributes to malignancy. The original hypothesis surrounding tumour suppressor genes defined a ‘two-hit’ requirement for mutagenesis; however, it is now known that deletion, silencing or downregulation of one or more genes may lead to cancer formation. There is a growing list of putative tumour suppressor genes, and recently several new candidates were added. Research into apoptosis, or programmed cell death, continues to expand. As pathways for which tumour suppressor genes are responsible become clearer, so do potential therapeutics to capitalise on these targets. A summary of the mechanisms by which tumour suppressor genes may act, the mutations which lead to tumourigenesis, and the clinical implications of these phenomena are presented. Key Concepts: Tumour suppressor genes prevent mutagenesis. Perturbation of tumour suppressor gene function may lead to cancer formation. The first tumour suppressor gene identified was the Rb gene, and mutations in the gene lead to the childhood cancer known as retinoblastoma. Although many tumour suppressor genes require two mutations to cause a loss-of-function, in some cases, downregulation of a single tumour suppressor gene may lead to cancer. The p53 gene is involved in a complex pathway of cell death and cell arrest, and mutations in p53 or other genes in the pathway can lead to the development of cancer. There are several other modulators of tumour formation, including telomeres, adhesion molecules and microRNA, that may function like tumour suppressor genes. Identification of tumour suppressor genes has lead to the development of anticancer therapeutic agents targeted to specific pathways that take advantage of this knowledge. Keywords: oncogene; cancer; tumour; tumour suppressor; p53; apoptosis

Jeffrey M Skolnik1,2† & Jeffrey S Barrett2 †Author for correspondence 1AstraZeneca, LP, Mail Stop C2B-112, 1800 Concord Pike, PO Box 15437, Wilmington, DE 19850-5437, USA Tel.: +1 302 885 7686; Fax: +1 302 886 2622; E-mail: jeffrey.skolnik@ astrazeneca.com 2The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Abramson Research Center, Room 916H, 3615 Civic Center Boulevard, PA 19104-4318, USA Tel.: +1 215 590 6359; Fax: +1 215 590 7544; E-mail: barrettj@ email.chop.edu ‘...despite these minor advances, pediatrics continues to use trial methodology first suggested over 60 years ago.’

9564 Background: Phase I cancer trials have traditionally used the 3+3 study design in which cohorts of three patients at a time are enrolled. The study is suspended to accrual with every 3rd patient, and again suspended to replace inevaluable patients. As the pediatric phase I starting dose is based on adult phase I safety data, we hypothesized that pediatric study timelines could be shortened without increasing risk using a novel rolling six design, in which up to 6 patients are concurrently enrolled per dose level. Methods: A trial simulation approach comparing the standard 3+3 design to the rolling six design was performed. Discrete time events (accrual/enrollment, evaluation and/or time to dose limiting toxicity (DLT) or inevaluability) with outcome probabilities (DLT/inevaluability) assigned to each subject based on historical data from phase I pediatric oncology trials. The probability of DLT was a function of dose level and varied distributions were used to assign discrete time elements. Metrics for study efficiency (time to complete study, total number of patients required) were determined for each design. Simulated trials and decision rule logic were coded using PC/Windows SAS v9.1. Results: The rolling six design outperformed the 3+3 design for the most relevant metrics. Average (±SD) time to study completion was 373±90 days vs. 431±98 days and the total number of patients required was 20±5 vs. 17±4 for the rolling six vs. 3+3 designs, respectively. There was no difference in the number of DLTs per study (3±1) between designs. Conclusions: The rolling six design is predicted to shorten pediatric phase 1 study timelines and will be tested prospectively in upcoming COG phase I trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Seven years after the launch of the European Paediatric Medicine Regulation, limited progress in paediatric oncology drug development remains a major concern amongst stakeholders – academics, industry, regulatory authorities, parents, patients and caregivers. Restricted increases in early phase paediatric oncology trials, legal requirements and regulatory pressure to propose early Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs), missed opportunities to explore new drugs potentially relevant for paediatric malignancies, lack of innovative trial designs and no new incentives to develop drugs against specific paediatric targets are some unmet needs. Better access to new anti-cancer drugs for paediatric clinical studies and improved collaboration between stakeholders are essential. The Cancer Drug Development Forum (CDDF), previously Biotherapy Development Association (BDA), with Innovative Therapy for Children with Cancer Consortium (ITCC), European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) and European Network for Cancer Research in Children and Adolescents (ENCCA) has created a unique Paediatric Oncology Platform, involving multiple stakeholders and the European Union (EU) Commission, with an urgent remit to improve paediatric oncology drug development. The Paediatric Oncology Platform proposes to recommend immediate changes in the implementation of the Regulation and set the framework for its 2017 revision; initiatives to incentivise drug development against specific paediatric oncology targets, and repositioning of drugs not developed in adults. Underpinning these changes is a strategy for mechanism of action and biology driven selection and prioritisation of potential paediatric indications rather than the current process based on adult cancer indications. Pre-competitive research and drug prioritisation, early portfolio evaluation, cross-industry cooperation and multi-compound/sponsor trials are being explored, from which guidance for innovative trial designs will be provided.