Search

To access publisher full text version of this article. Please click on the hyperlink in Additional Links field. Three genome-wide association studies in Europe and the USA have reported eight urinary bladder cancer (UBC) susceptibility loci. Using extended case and control series and 1000 Genomes imputations of 5 340 737 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), we searched for additional loci in the European GWAS. The discovery sample set consisted of 1631 cases and 3822 controls from the Netherlands and 603 cases and 37 781 controls from Iceland. For follow-up, we used 3790 cases and 7507 controls from 13 sample sets of European and Iranian ancestry. Based on the discovery analysis, we followed up signals in the urea transporter (UT) gene SLC14A. The strongest signal at this locus was represented by a SNP in intron 3, rs17674580, that reached genome-wide significance in the overall analysis of the discovery and follow-up groups: odds ratio = 1.17, P = 7.6 × 10(-11). SLC14A1 codes for UTs that define the Kidd blood group and are crucial for the maintenance of a constant urea concentration gradient in the renal medulla and, through this, the kidney's ability to concentrate urine. It is speculated that rs17674580, or other sequence variants in LD with it, indirectly modifies UBC risk by affecting urine production. If confirmed, this would support the 'urogenous contact hypothesis' that urine production and voiding frequency modify the risk of UBC. info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/018827 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/218071 Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre (RUNMC) Prinses Beatrix Fonds VSB Fonds National Institute of Mental Health (NIH/NIMH) MH078075 Cancer Research UK Yorkshire Cancer Research European Union 513943 Compagnia di San Paolo-Human Genetics Foundation (HuGeF) Italian Association for Cancer Research, Italy Piedmont Region Progetti di Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata Flemish government Belgian province of Limburg Swedish Cancer Society Swedish Research Council Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research Shiraz, Iran ICR-87-502 Red Tematica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer RD06/0020/1054

Previously, we reported germline DNA variants associated with risk of urinary bladder cancer (UBC) in Dutch and Icelandic subjects. Here we expanded the Icelandic sample set and tested the top 20 markers from the combined analysis in several European case-control sample sets, with a total of 4,739 cases and 45,549 controls. The T allele of rs798766 on 4p16.3 was found to associate with UBC (odds ratio = 1.24, P = 9.9 × 10 12). rs798766 is located in an intron of TACC3, 70 kb from FGFR3, which often harbors activating somatic mutations in low-grade, noninvasive UBC. Notably, rs798766[T] shows stronger association with low-grade and low-stage UBC than with more aggressive forms of the disease and is associated with higher risk of recurrence in low-grade stage Ta tumors. The frequency of rs798766[T] is higher in Ta tumors that carry an activating mutation in FGFR3 than in Ta tumors with wild-type FGFR3. Our results show a link between germline variants, somatic mutations of FGFR3 and risk of UBC. © 2010 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved., Vlaamse regering 513943 Compagnia di San Paolo Yorkshire Cancer Research Adessium Foundation European Commission: LSHC-CT-2005 218071 Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds, We thank the individuals who participated in the study and whose contribution made this work possible. We also thank the nurses at deCODE’s recruitment center and the personnel at the deCODE core facilities. We acknowledge the Icelandic Cancer Registry for assistance in the ascertainment of the Icelandic UBC cases. C.Z. and S.B. are funded by a FP7-MC-IAPP Grant agreement no. 218071 (CancerGene). Collection of samples and data in Iceland and The Netherlands was funded in part by the European Commission (POLYGENE: LSHC-CT-2005) and a research investment grant of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre. Control samples for the Dutch follow-up group were genotyped with generous support from the ‘Prinses Beatrix Fonds’, VSB Fonds, H. Kersten and M. Kersten (Kersten Foundation), The Netherlands ALS Foundation, J.R. van Dijk and the Adessium foundation. The controls from the Dutch Schizophrenia GWA study were genotyped with the support of the US National Institute of Mental Health (R.A.O.). The Leeds Bladder Cancer Study was funded by Cancer Research UK and Yorkshire Cancer Research. The Torino Bladder Cancer Case Control Study was supported by a grant to ECNIS (Environmental Cancer Risk, Nutrition and Individual Susceptibility), a network of excellence operating within the European Union Sixth Framework Program, Priority 5:‘Food Quality and Safety’ (Contract No. 513943), and by grants of the Compagnia di San Paolo, of the Italian Association for Cancer Research and of the Piedmont Region Progetti de Ricerca Sanitaria Finalizzata, Italy. The Belgian case-control study on bladder cancer risk was supported by a grant of the Flemish government, the government of the Belgian province of Limburg and the Limburg Cancer Fund., 1Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Technology Assessment and 2Department of Urology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 3Comprehensive Cancer Center East, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 4deCODE Genetics, Reykjavik, Iceland. 5Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and 6Section of Experimental Oncology, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, St. James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK. 7Christie Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. 8Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 9National Institute of Environmental Health, Budapest, Hungary. 10Environmental Health Centre, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 11State Health Institute, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia. 12Institute for Scientific Interchange (ISI) Foundation, Torino, Italy. 13Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK. 14Department of Genetics, Biology and Biochemistry, University of Torino, Torino, Italy. 15Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy. 16Centre for Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention (CPO Piemonte), Torino, Italy. 17Department of Experimental and Applied Medicine, Section of Occupational Medicine and Industrial Hygiene, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. 18Unit of Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 19Department of Complex Genetics, Cluster of Genetics and Cell Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 20Leuven University Centre for Cancer Prevention (LUCK), Leuven, Belgium. 21Department of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. 22Division of Urology, San Jorge Hospital, Huesca, Spain. 23Division of Urology, Hospital Clinico, Zaragoza, Spain. 24Department of Urology, University of Zaragoza School of Medicine, Zaragoza, Spain. 25Division of Surgical Pathology, San Jorge Hospital, Huesca, Spain. 26Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany. 27Department of Urology, Paul Gerhardt Foundation, Lutherstadt Wittenberg, Germany. 28Department of Medical Genetics, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 29University of California Los Angeles Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics, Los Angeles, USA. 30Department of Neurology, Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 31Department of Medical Oncology, 32Department of Urology and 33Department of Pathology, Landspitali–University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland. 34Department of Urology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Zonguldak, Turkey. 35Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 36Department of General Practice, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 37Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 38Division of Medical Oncology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. 39Division of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany. 40Section of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 41Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden. 42Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 43Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. 44These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence should be addressed to L.A.K. (b.kiemeney@ebh.umcn.nl) or K.S. (kstefans@decode.is).

We conducted a multi-stage, genome-wide association study of bladder cancer with a primary scan of 591,637 SNPs in 3,532 affected individuals (cases) and 5,120 controls of European descent from five studies followed by a replication strategy, which included 8,382 cases and 48,275 controls from 16 studies. In a combined analysis, we identified three new regions associated with bladder cancer on chromosomes 22q13.1, 19q12 and 2q37.1: rs1014971, (P = 8 × 10⁻¹²) maps to a non-genic region of chromosome 22q13.1, rs8102137 (P = 2 × 10⁻¹¹) on 19q12 maps to CCNE1 and rs11892031 (P = 1 × 10⁻⁷) maps to the UGT1A cluster on 2q37.1. We confirmed four previously identified genome-wide associations on chromosomes 3q28, 4p16.3, 8q24.21 and 8q24.3, validated previous candidate associations for the GSTM1 deletion (P = 4 × 10⁻¹¹) and a tag SNP for NAT2 acetylation status (P = 4 × 10⁻¹¹), and found interactions with smoking in both regions. Our findings on common variants associated with bladder cancer risk should provide new insights into the mechanisms of carcinogenesis.