1. Open versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Comparative Study of Over 25,000 Open Cases and the Major Laparoscopic Bariatric Reported Series
- Author
-
L. Michael Howell, Steven Hendrick, Joseph D. Afram, Mark T. Jaroch, Kenneth B Jones, Latham Flanagan, Oscar C. Lirio, James A Sapala, Michael P Schuhknecht, Peter N. Benotti, Michael H. Wood, William A. Sweet, Kerry Kole, Robert P Shapiro, C. Gary Cooper, and Rafael F. Capella
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Incisional hernia ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Gastric bypass ,Gastric Bypass ,Postoperative Complications ,Weight loss ,medicine ,Humans ,Hernia ,Laparoscopy ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Rapid expansion ,Length of Stay ,medicine.disease ,Roux-en-Y anastomosis ,Hernia, Abdominal ,Surgery ,Bowel obstruction ,Treatment Outcome ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Intestinal Obstruction - Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic bariatric surgery has experienced a rapid expansion of interest over the past 5 years, with a 470% increase. This rapid expansion has markedly increased overall cost, reducing surgical access. Many surgeons believe that the traditional open approach is a cheaper, safer, equally effective alternative. Methods: 16 highly experienced "open" bariatric surgeons with a combined total of 25,759 cases representing >200 surgeon years of experience, pooled their open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (ORYGBP) data, and compared their results to the leading laparoscopic (LRYGBP) papers in the literature. Results: In the overall series, the incisional hernia rate was 6.4% using the standard midline incision. Utilizing the left subcostal incision (LSI), it was only 0.3%. Return to surgery in
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF