Search

Inflammatory skin diseases involve various different immune cells in a localised area. Here the authors use spatial transcriptomics to show that disease relevant cytokine transcripts are sparsely expressed in lesional skin, yet are associated with local amplification cascades that promote skin inflammation.

Nailfold capillaroscopy, based on bright-field microscopy, is widely used to diagnose systemic sclerosis (SSc). However it cannot reveal information about venules and arterioles lying deep under the nailfold, nor can it provide detailed data about surface microvasculature when the skin around the nail is thick. These limitations reflect the fact that capillaroscopy is based on microscopy methods whose penetration depth is restricted to about 200 μm. We investigated whether ultra-wideband raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy (UWB-RSOM) can resolve small capillaries of the nailfold in healthy volunteers and compared the optoacoustic data to conventional capillaroscopy examinations. We quantified UWB-RSOM-resolved capillary density and capillary diameter as features that relate to SSc biomarkers, and we obtained the first three-dimensional, in vivo images of the deeper arterioles and venules. These results establish the potential of UWB-RSOM for analyzing SSc-relevant markers.

Objective: Patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) frequently show spontaneous improvement of skin fibrosis. Our aim was to examine whether an improvement in skin fibrosis predicts lower likelihood of visceral organ progression and better survival., Methods: Patients from the European Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) cohort with dcSSc, baseline modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) ≥7, and valid mRSS at 12±3 months follow up were included. Regression/progression of skin fibrosis was defined as a decrease/increase in mRSS >5 points and ≥25% from baseline to follow up. The outcomes included progression of lung, renal, cardiac and gastrointestinal manifestations using consensus derived definitions and all-cause death. Regressive, stable and progressive patients were compared by univariate, Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis., Results: Of 1257 included patients, 883 (70.2%) were stable, 282 (22.4%) regressive, and 92 (7.3%) progressive. Regressive patients, adjusted for baseline mRSS, baseline immunosuppression, baseline FVC, and disease duration, showed a significantly lower probability of FVC decline ≥10% than progressive patients (p=0.00003), lower probability of all-cause mortality during follow up (p=0.035) compared to progressive patients. .Improvement of skin fibrosis was not associated with progression of other organ manifestations., Conclusion: We found that regression of skin fibrosis is associated with a lower probability of lung progression and better survival at follow up. The link between the disease course of skin and lung fibrosis in SSc can help to better stratify patients in clinical practice and enrich for ILD progressive patients in clinical trials., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease characterized by intense itch and eczematous skin lesions. Some patients continue to experience flares and substantial clinical burden despite ongoing systemic treatment., Objectives: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily upadacitinib (UPA), initiated at 15 mg and dose-escalated to 30 mg based on clinical response, compared with dupilumab (DUPI) per its label. Week 16 primary analysis results are presented., Methods: Level Up is a phase 3b/4 global, randomized, open-label, efficacy assessor blinded study evaluating UPA vs DUPI in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe AD who had inadequate response to systemic therapy or when use was inadvisable. Patients were randomized to UPA or DUPI for 16 weeks of treatment (Period 1). Patients on UPA started on 15 mg and were dose-escalated to 30 mg if they did not achieve an Eczema Area and Severity Index reduction of at least 50% (EASI 50) or a ≥4-point Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) improvement on/after Week 4, or EASI 75 on/after Week 8. The primary endpoint was simultaneous achievement of EASI 90 and WP-NRS 0/1 at Week 16. Ranked secondary endpoints included skin and itch responses at varying response levels and timepoints. Safety measures were assessed throughout the study., Results: Superior efficacy in achieving simultaneous EASI 90 and WP-NRS 0/1 response at Week 16 was demonstrated with UPA vs DUPI (19.9% vs 8.9%, respectively; p<0.0001). UPA showed superiority vs DUPI for all ranked secondary endpoints, with post-hoc analyses exhibiting higher itch response rates as early as Day 2. No new safety signals were identified during this period., Conclusion: Treatment of moderate-to-severe AD with UPA, initiated at 15 mg and dose escalated based on clinical response, demonstrated superiority vs DUPI per its label for the primary endpoint of simultaneous achievement of near complete skin clearance (EASI 90) and little to no itch (WP-NRS 0/1) at Week 16, with all ranked secondary endpoints demonstrating superiority at varying skin and itch response levels and timepoints. There were no new safety signals identified compared to the previously reported safety profiles of UPA and DUPI., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Background: Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKinibs) have the potential to dramatically alter the landscape of atopic dermatitis (AD) management due to their promising efficacy results from phase 3 trials and rapid onset of action. However, JAKinibs are not without risk, and their use is not appropriate for all AD patients, making this a medication class that dermatologists should understand and consider when treating patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Objective: This consensus expert opinion statement from the International Eczema Council (IEC) provides a pragmatic approach to prescribing JAKinibs, including choosing appropriate patients, dosing, clinical and lab monitoring, as well as long-term use., Methods: An international cohort of authors from the IEC with expertise in JAKinibs selected topics of interest and were formed into authorship groups covering 10 subsections. The groups performed topic-specific literature reviews, consulted up-to-date adverse event (AE) data, referred to product labels and provided analysis and expert opinion. The manuscript guidance and recommendations were reviewed by all authors as well as the IEC Research Committee., Results: We recommend JAKinibs be considered for patients with moderate to severe AD seeking the benefits of rapid reduction in disease burden and itch, oral administration, and the potential for flexible dosing. Baseline risk factors should be assessed prior to prescribing JAKinibs, including increasing age, venous thromboembolisms, malignancy, cardiovascular health, kidney/liver function, pregnancy and lactation, and immunocompetence. Patients being considered for JAKinib therapy should be current on vaccinations and we provide a generalized framework for laboratory monitoring, though clinicians should consult individual product labels for recommendations as there are variations among the JAKinib class. Patients who achieve disease control should be maintained on the lowest possible dose, as many of the observed AEs occurred in a dose-dependent manner. Future studies are needed in AD patients to assess the durability and safety of continuous long-term use of JAKinibs, combination medication regimens, and the effects of flexible, episodic treatment over time., Conclusions: The decision to initiate a JAKinib should be shared among patient and provider, accounting for AD severity and personal risk/benefit assessment, including consideration of baseline health risk factors, monitoring requirements and treatment costs., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD), with its hallmark symptoms of pruritus and skin lesions, often impairs patients' quality of life. We assessed time spent with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch during upadacitinib treatment versus placebo or dupilumab among patients with moderate-to-severe AD., Methods: This analysis consisted of a post hoc analysis of Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), and Heads Up (NCT03738397). Measure Up 1 and 2 were replicate, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies with patients randomized (1:1:1) to once-daily oral upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo for 16 weeks. Heads Up was a head-to-head, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3b study with patients randomized (1:1) to upadacitinib 30 mg or subcutaneous dupilumab 300 mg for 24 weeks. Skin clearance was assessed with the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) at baseline, weeks 1, 2, and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter. Itch was assessed using the Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS) daily over 16 weeks and every 2 weeks thereafter to week 24 in Heads Up., Results: This analysis included 1683 patients in Measure Up 1 and 2 and 673 patients in Heads Up. Through 16 weeks in Measure Up 1 and 2, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 9.8-13.4 times as many days with an EASI 90 response and 7.0-10.3 times as many days with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus placebo. In Heads Up, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 2.0 and 1.7 times as many days through 16 and 24 weeks, respectively, with an EASI 90 response versus dupilumab. Through 16 and 24 weeks, patients receiving upadacitinib spent 3.0 and 2.6 times as many days, respectively, with a WP-NRS 0/1 response versus dupilumab., Conclusions: Patients with moderate-to-severe AD spent more time with clear/almost clear skin and no/minimal itch with upadacitinib versus placebo or dupilumab., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, Measure Up 1 (NCT03569293), Measure Up 2 (NCT03607422), Heads Up (NCT03738397)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Importance: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with unmet needs for tailored treatment and therapy de-escalation strategies., Objective: To evaluate early intervention with and prolonging the dosing interval for guselkumab, a p19 subunit-targeted interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis., Design, Setting, and Participants: The GUIDE clinical trial is an ongoing phase 3b, randomized, double-blinded trial conducted across 80 centers in Germany and France comprising 3 parts evaluating the impact of early disease intervention, prolonged dosing interval, and maintenance of response following treatment withdrawal among adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In study part 2, reported herein, first and last patient visits were September 2019 and March 2022, respectively., Interventions: In GUIDE part 1 (week [W]0-W28), patients received guselkumab, 100 mg, at W0, W4, W12, and W20. Those achieving a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 0 at both W20 and W28 were termed super responders (SRes). In part 2 (W28-W68), SRes were randomized to guselkumab, 100 mg, every 8 weeks or every 16 weeks; non-SRes continued open-label guselkumab every 8 weeks., Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority (with a 10% margin) of guselkumab every 16 weeks vs every 8 weeks dosing among SRes for maintenance of disease control (PASI <3 at W68). Biomarker substudies assessed immunologic effects in skin and blood., Results: Overall, 822 patients received guselkumab in part 2 (297 [36.1%] SRes [every 8 weeks/every 16 weeks; n = 148/n = 149] and 525 [63.9%] non-SRes). Among SRes, mean (SD) age was 39.4 (14.1) years, 95 (32.0%) were female, and 202 (68.0%) were male. The primary end point of noninferiority for guselkumab every 16 weeks vs every 8 weeks in SRes was met (P = .001), with 91.9% (137/149; 90% CI, 87.3%-95.3%) of SRes receiving every 16 weeks and 92.6% (137/148; 90% CI, 88.0%-95.8%) of SRes receiving dosing every 8 weeks having PASI lower than 3 at W68. Clinical effects corresponded with immunologic changes; skin CD8-positive tissue-resident memory T (TRM)-cell count decreased quickly from baseline, remaining low in both dosing groups. Similarly, serum IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, and β defensin (BD)-2 levels decreased significantly from baseline, remaining low in both dosing groups to W68. Guselkumab was well-tolerated; no new safety signals were identified., Conclusions and Relevance: Psoriasis treatment guidelines lack or provide inconsistent advice on patient stratification and treatment de-escalation. We present the first randomized trial providing evidence that, in patients with early complete skin clearance at 2 consecutive visits (W20 and W28), extending the guselkumab dosing interval may control disease activity., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03818035.

Purpose: Currently, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) there is a lack of evidence demonstrating optimal biologic treatment response with respect to disease duration. The aim of this post-hoc analysis, using real world data from the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO), is to provide evidence if early intervention with biologics is associated with better treatment outcomes and if there is any difference among drug classes or individual biologics., Materials and Methods: For this post-hoc analysis patients were categorised into two subgroups according to shorter (≤2 years) or longer (>2 years) disease duration. Analysis was performed on anti-interleukin (IL)-17A cohort vs other biologics cohort, anti-IL-17A vs other drug classes, and pairwise comparisons of ixekizumab vs individual biologics, provided that the statistical models converged. Analysis investigated the association of disease duration with the proportion of patients achieving 100% improvement in Psoriasis Area Severity Index score (PASI 100) at week 12. Adjusted comparative analyses, reported as odds ratio (OR), were performed using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA) for each cohort or treatments within each subcategory of the subgroups., Results: At week 12, anti-IL-17A and other biologics cohorts displayed minimal differences in numerical response rate for PASI 100 with respect to disease duration. The anti-IL-17A cohort showed a higher numerical PASI 100 response rate compared to the other biologic cohort irrespective of disease duration (≤2 years: 36.7% vs 21.8%; >2 years: 35.8% vs 21.9%)., Conclusion: Overall, the results do not clearly indicate that treating patients early is critical in achieving optimal patient outcomes. Furthermore, patients treated with ixekizumab show numerically higher response rates relative to other individual biologics irrespective of disease duration.

Biologics are approved for various dermatologic, allergic, rheumatic, and gastroenterologic inflammatory diseases, as well as for numerous malignancies. The dermatologic adverse events from treatment with biologics may resemble primary inflammatory diseases but differ in pathogenesis. In this article, we describe five different pathogenic mechanisms of dermatologic adverse events. By studying these mechanisms, we hope to gain valuable insights into the pathogenesis of primary inflammatory diseases. In addition, in this article, we provide recommendations for the treatment and management of the dermatological adverse events induced by biologics., (© 2024 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG).)