Search

Background Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic there has been a documented decline in reports to child protective services, despite an increased incidence of child maltreatment. This is concerning for increasing missed cases. This study aims to examine if and how Canadian paediatricians are identifying maltreatment in virtual medical appointments. Methods A survey was sent through the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP) to 2770 practicing general and subspecialty paediatricians. Data was collected November 2021 to January 2022. Results With a 34% (928/2770) response rate, 704 surveys were eligible for analysis. At least one case of child maltreatment was reported by 11% (78/700) of respondents following a virtual appointment. The number of cases reported was associated with years in medical practice (P = 0.026) but not with the volume (P = 0.735) or prior experience (P = 0.127) with virtual care, or perceived difficulty in identifying cases virtually (Cramer's V = 0.096). The most common factors triggering concern were the presence of social stressors, or a clear disclosure. The virtual physical exam was not contributory. Nearly one quarter (24%, 34/143) required a subsequent in-person appointment prior to reporting the case and 32% (207/648) reported concerns that a case had been identified late, or missed, following a virtual appointment. Some commented that clear harm resulted. Conclusions Many barriers to detecting child maltreatment were identified by paediatricians who used virtual care. This survey reveals that virtual care may be an important factor in missed cases of child maltreatment and may present challenges to timely identification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Current guidelines by the Canadian Paediatric Society on treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) exclude infants ≤ 60 days old. There is considerable practice variability in this age group, especially around the optimal duration of parenteral antibiotics. The study aimed to assess local practice patterns, and the safety of a short course (≤3 days) of parenteral antibiotics in young infants. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 95 infants (≤60 days) with confirmed UTIs were identified at British Columbia Children's Hospital. Patients receiving short (≤3 days) and long (>3 days) duration of parenteral antibiotics were compared. Outcomes of interest included urinary tract infection recurrence within 30 days, hospital length of stay (LOS), representation, and readmission. Results Twenty infants (21%) received a short course of parenteral antibiotics. These infants were older (median 47 days versus 28 days) and non-bacteremic. Urinary tract infection recurrence was identified in 8 patients (8%), of which 7 were treated with a long duration (P = 1.0). Patients treated with a short duration had a significantly shorter LOS, with a mean difference of 4.21 days [95% CI: 3.37 to 5.05] (P < 0.001). All five (5%) bacteremic patients were treated exclusively with parenteral antibiotics. Conclusions In a Canadian setting, a short course of parenteral antibiotics is safe in young, non-bacteremic infants with UTIs. Despite substantial evidence, local practice patterns suggest a tendency towards prescription of long courses, providing an opportunity for quality improvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The incidence of antibiotic-resistant urinary tract infections (UTIs) in children is increasing. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors for third-generation cephalosporin-resistant UTIs presenting to the paediatric emergency department (ED). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at British Columbia Children's Hospital. Children aged 0 to 18 years old presenting to the ED between July 1, 2013 and June 30, 2014 and were found to have UTI due to Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas species were included. Patient demographics, clinical features, laboratory findings, and outcomes were compared using standard statistical analyses. Risk factors for resistant UTIs were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. Results There were 294 eligible patients. The median age was 27.4 months. A third-generation cephalosporin-resistant organism was identified in 36 patients (12%). Patients with resistant UTI had lower rates of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy (25% versus 95.3%, P<0.05), higher rates of hospitalization (38.9% versus 21.3%, P<0.05), higher rates of undergoing a voiding cystourethrogram (19.4% versus 5.0%, P<0.05), and higher rates of UTI recurrence within 30 days (13.9% versus 4.7%, P<0.05). In multivariate analysis, recent hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 4.3, confidence interval [CI] 1.2 to 16) and antibiotic therapy (OR 3.5, CI 1.5 to 8.5) within the previous 30 days were risk factors for resistant UTI. Conclusions Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant organisms account for a significant proportion of community-acquired paediatric UTIs. Recent hospitalization and antibiotic use are associated with increased risk of resistant UTI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the British Columbia (BC) Centre for Disease Control's Influenza Surveillance report which reveals the importance of influenza vaccines and immunization for children and pregnant women in Canada and British Columbia.

A letter to the editor is presented in response to an article on the use of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) for the treatment of influenza which includes the limited usage of the drug, and the marginal benefits of the expensive drug.

Background: Penicillin allergy is a common drug allergy diagnosis in pediatric patients; however, upon appropriate allergy testing, many of these patients are found not to have a true allergy. For patients with a reported allergy, alternative antibiotics are prescribed, which are less effective, more toxic, or more expensive. There is a lack of data evaluating allergies in hospitalized children and comparing allergy assessments conducted by pediatric allergists and pharmacists., Objective: To estimate the percentage of pediatric patients admitted with reported penicillin allergy who did not have a true penicillin allergy., Methods: This single-centre prospective cohort study included inpatients between 6 months and 17 years of age, with a documented penicillin allergy, who were admitted to the general pediatric and oncology units of a tertiary care children's hospital between November 2019 and March 2023. The allergy history, evaluation, and risk categorization were performed by pharmacists. The history was reviewed with the allergist, and the patient was then referred, underwent skin testing, or received oral amoxicillin challenge with monitoring for 1 hour., Results: Thirty patients were included, of whom 29 (97%) had delabelling of their penicillin allergy. Four patients (13%) had delabelling on the basis of history alone, without risk assessment. Twenty-five (83%) of the patients were assessed as having low risk; 24 of these had delabelling following oral challenge, and 1 did not complete the oral challenge because of transfer to another hospital. One patient (3%) was assessed as having moderate risk, with delabelling on the basis of results of skin testing and oral challenge. The pharmacist's and allergist's risk assessments were in agreement in 29 (97%) of the 30 cases., Conclusions: Pediatric patients, including those with oncologic malignancies, are often mislabelled as having a penicillin allergy. Pharmacists are able to accurately determine true allergy risk and delabel penicillin allergies for pediatric patients in the hospital setting., Competing Interests: Competing interests: For activities unrelated to the study reported here, Raymond Mak has received speaker’s honoraria from ALK, Sanofi, CSL Behring, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Novartis; and Tiffany Wong has received speaker’s honoraria from Valeo, Pfizer, CeraVe, and Polaris Health. Dr Wong also serves as Faculty Lead for the Spread Quality Improvement initiative of the Provincial Health Services Authority (British Columbia) and Faculty Lead for Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, Postgraduate Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia. No other competing interests were declared., (2024 Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists. All content in the Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy is copyrighted by the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacy. In submitting their manuscripts, the authors transfer, assign, and otherwise convey all copyright ownership to CSHP.)

Background: Direct comparisons of paediatric hospitalizations for acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) can inform health system planning. We describe the absolute and relative hospital burden of acute paediatric COVID-19 and MIS-C in Canada., Methods: This national prospective study was conducted via the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program from March 2020-May 2021. Children younger than 18 years old and hospitalized for acute COVID-19 or MIS-C were included in the analysis. Outcomes included supplemental oxygen (low-flow oxygen or high-flow nasal cannula), ventilation (non-invasive or conventional mechanical), vasopressors, paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission, or death. Adjusted risk differences (aRD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to identify factors associated with each diagnosis., Results: Overall, we identified 330 children hospitalized for acute COVID-19 (including five deaths) and 208 hospitalized for MIS-C (including zero deaths); PICU admission was required for 49.5% of MIS-C hospitalizations versus 18.2% of acute COVID-19 hospitalizations (aRD 20.3; 95% CI, 9.9-30.8). Resource use differed by age, with children younger than one year hospitalized more often for acute COVID-19 (aRD 43.4% versus MIS-C; 95% CI, 37.7-49.1) and more children 5-11 years hospitalized for MIS-C (aRD 38.9% vs. acute COVID-19; 95% CI, 31.0-46.9)., Conclusion: While there were more hospitalizations and deaths from acute paediatric COVID-19, MIS-C cases were more severe, requiring more intensive care and vasopressor support. Our findings suggest that both acute COVID-19 and MIS-C should be considered when assessing the overall burden of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in hospitalized children., Competing Interests: Competing interests CMH is the Director of Children’s Mental Health of Ontario, and the Director of Medical Affairs for the Canadian Paediatric Society and Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program. MPM has received consulting fees from Sobin and Abbvie and payment for expert testimony from the Canadian Medical Protective Association. RAB has received honoraria and participated in advisory boards with SOBI, Roche, Amgen, and AbbVie. KB served as Past President of the Community Paediatrics Section of the Canadian Paediatric Society and has received royalties from Brush Education. TLB is an employee of the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). KC is Chair of the Acute Care Committee of the Canadian Paediatric Society and is past-president of the Emergency Medicine Section of the Canadian Paediatric Society. EJD is Chair of the Scientific Research Committee and a director of Epilepsy Canada. She is also a member of Partners Against Mortality in Epilepsy and the advisory boards of Cardiol, Pendopharm and Stoke Therapeutics. CF is Chair of the Scientific Steering Committee for the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program, former Chair of the Specialty Committee in Paediatrics of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, former president of the Canadian Paediatric Society, and member of the Executive as Secretary of the Canadian Critical Care Society. She has received reimbursement for travel expenses from Canadian Paediatric Society and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. She has also received an honorarium for a presentation at a continuing education conference from the Université de Sherbrooke. SF is the President of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada and has received consulting fees from Toronto Metropolitan University. RML has received honoraria for serving as a consultant to Sobi, Novartis, Sanofi, and Eli Lilly, as chair for data monitoring committees for Eli Lilly and Novartis, and from the Canadian Rheumatology Association. JP has received consultant fees from AbbVie, honoraria from AbbVie, AstraZeneca and Seegene, and he received respiratory virus testing materials from Seegene for his institution. He has participated in ad hoc advisory board meetings for AbbVie and Merck and is a voting member of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization. RP is a consultant for Verity Pharmaceuticals. MS is supported via salary awards from the BC Children’s Hospital Foundation and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and has been an investigator on projects funded by GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, Sanofi-Pasteur, Seqirus, Symvivo and VBI Vaccines. All funds have been paid to his institute, and he has not received any personal payments. MIS is an employee of the Public Health Agency of Canada. EH has participated in advisory board meetings of CSL-Behring and Takeda, data safety monitoring boards of Rocket Pharmaceutical and Jasper Therapeutics, and has patent applications with Immugenia and Immune Biosolutions. RS has received honoraria and served on an advisory board and as a consultant with Novartis, honoraria from Canadian Rheumatology Association, is a board member for Rheumatology for All, and her institution receives funding from Bristol Myers Squibb for a patient registry for which she is Principal Investigator. RSMY has received grant funding from CFI, CIHR, Genome Canada, PHAC and the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force, and The Arthritis Society; is a member of the Science and Industry Advisory Committee at Genome Canada and Medical Advisory Board at Kawasaki Disease Canada; and a member of a data safety monitoring board for a study on IL-1 inhibitors for Kawasaki Disease. FK has received honoraria for presentations given to the Association des Pédiatres du Québec and receives CMV testing kits from Altona Diagnostics. SKM has received honoraria for lectures from GlaxoSmithKline, was a member of ad hoc advisory boards for Pfizer Canada and Sanofi Pasteur, and is an investigator on an investigator led grant from Pfizer. DSF, OD, TET, MK, and MLT have no conflicts of interest to report.